ABO blood group but not haemostasis genetic polymorphisms significantly influence thrombotic risk: a study of 180 homozygotes for the Factor V Leiden mutation

Limited data exist on the impact of additional genetic risk factors on the clinical manifestations of factor (F) V Leiden homozygotes. A retrospective multi-centre cohort study was performed to assess the role of the FII G20210A gene mutation, the protein C (PC) promoter CG haplotype, the combination of two PC polymorphisms (A-1641G, C-1654T), the FXIII Val34Leu polymorphism, two thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor polymorphisms (Thr325Ile, Ala147Thr), two plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 polymorphisms (-675 4G/5G, A-844G), the methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism and the ABO blood group on the thrombotic phenotype in FV Leiden homozygotes. 127 subjects with venous thrombosis and 53 asymptomatic subjects were analysed. The T allele of MTHFR C677T was more frequent in symptomatic subjects than in asymptomatic ones (68% vs. 45%, P  = 0·02; odds ratio (OR) 2·8, 95% CI 1·3–5·8, after adjustment for potential confounders). For the other polymorphisms, no difference was observed between symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. The non-O blood group was more frequent among symptomatic carriers (84% vs. 57%, P  = 0·0002; OR 4·1, 95% CI 1·7–9·7). In conclusion, except for the ABO blood group, none of the polymorphisms studied contribute strongly to the thrombotic risk in FV Leiden homozygotes.     

FV Leiden mutation and risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in Serbian population

The absolute rate of recurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is approximately 5% per year. There is a lower rate of recurrence in provoked VTE, and higher in idiopathic one. So far, there is no consensus whether hereditary thrombophilia should be considered as a persistent risk factor, and whether it requires long-term anticoagulant therapy. The aim of our study was to estimate the risk of recurrent VTE in patients carrying FV Leiden mutation in Serbian population.In retrospective study (1994-2006), we have evaluated the risk of recurrent VTE in 56 patients who are carriers of FV Leiden mutation, in comparison to group consisting of 56 patients non-carriers of FV Leiden mutation. Patients with FII G20210A and MTHFR C677T mutations, antiphospholipid antibodies, antithrombin III, protein C or protein S deficiency, malignancies and diabetes were excluded from the study.Recurrent VTE occurred in 44.6% of the patients, carriers of the FV Leiden mutations, vs. 26.7% in non-carriers group (P<0.05). The incidence rate was 3.7 and 2.2% per year, respectively. The estimated relative risk of recurrence for FV Leiden carriers was 1.67 (95% CI 0.99-2.81, P=0.049). The 60% of patients with mutation and only 13% without mutation develop rethrombosis during first year after discontinuance of therapy (P<0.01).In our study patients with symptomatic VTE who are carriers of the FV Leiden gene mutations have a higher risk of recurrent VTE than non-carriers. Our data suggest the importance of the FV Leiden mutation detection and the estimation of the clinical condition for successful secondary prophylaxis of VTE.     

Genetic polymorphisms associated with acute pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis.

Frequently an inherited predisposition to thrombosis remains clinically silent until an additional environmental factor intervenes. The present study aimed to assess distribution of inherited risk factors of venous thrombosis in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). The prevalences of factor V Leiden (FV Leiden), prothrombin factor II G20210A (FII G20210A), C677T and A1298C of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) mutations were studied in 149 VTE patients and 100 controls. The following key risks were established: previous deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (23.5%), bed rest (34.2%), immobilisation of lower limb (10.1%), hospitalisation (30.9%) and obesity (28.9%). In 29 (19%) patients and in three (3%) controls FV Leiden was found. A significant association between VTE and FV Leiden was established. There were six (4%) carriers of the FII G20210A among VTE patients and one in the controls. No associations between VTE and MTHFR polymorphisms (C677T, A1298C) were found. In three of 149 patients both FV Leiden and FII G20210A polymorphisms were observed. The mean protein C activity was slightly, though nonsignificantly, smaller in VTE patients. In conclusion, there was a positive association between venous thromboembolism and factor V Leiden. Only a weak trend favouring a relationship between prothrombin factor II G20210A and venous thrombolism was present. No associations between common polymorphisms of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and venous thromboembolism were found.     

Contribution of the glycoprotein Ia 807TT, methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase 677TT and prothrombin 20210GA genotypes to prothrombotic risk among factor V 1691GA (Leiden) carriers

The cooperative effects of the GPIa 807TT, MTHFR 677TT and prothrombin 20210GA genotypes with the FV Leiden 1691GA (FVL) genotype were evaluated by comparing these genotype frequencies in 77 asymptomatic and 156 symptomatic heterozygous FVL carriers. The GPIa 807TT and MTHFR 677TT genotypes did not segregate within the symptomatic FVL carrier group and did not contribute to venous thrombotic risk in this patient cohort. There was no difference in the prothrombin 20210GA genotype frequency between asymptomatic FVL carriers and a random Caucasian control group; however, the prothrombin 20210GA genotype was nearly 5 times as prevalent (19/156 v 2/77; P < 0.02) in the symptomatic FVL carriers (odds ratio 5.21; 95% confidence interval 1.20-47.62), demonstrating that this important prothrombotic risk factor acts synergistically with FVL.     

Risk of recurrent venous thrombosis in patients with G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene or factor V Leiden mutation.

The impact of the G20210A prothrombin mutation, factor V Leiden and 677T mutation of methylene tetrahydrofalate reductase (MTHFR) in recurrent deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is not so clear. We have prospectively monitored 259 patients following a first episode of DVT in order to determine which factors influence the development of a recurrent event. Several clinical and biological factors together with the genetic polymorphisms of factor V Leiden, G20210A prothrombin and 677T MTHFR were assessed. During a median follow-up of 786 patient-years, 27 patients (14%) developed one objective episode of recurrent venous thrombosis. The carriers of a double defect, homozygous or double heterozygous for factor V Leiden and G20210A, had an increased risk after a first episode of DVT, while patients who were isolated heterozygous for factor V Leiden or G20210 had a risk of recurrent DVT similar to patients who had neither mutation (annual incidence of 12.1, 3.1, 2.9 and 2.8%). The 677T MTHFR mutation alone or combined with hyperhomocysteinemia was not associated with an increased risk of recurrent events. The development of proximal DVT (P=0.01) and the presence of a double defect (P=0.01) were the only two risk factors independently associated with a high recurrence ratio in the multivariate analysis. Thus, the annual incidence of DVT recurrence in patients without any of these two risk factors was only 0.6% (95% confidence interval, 0.2-0.9). We have identified a group of patients with DVT but at very low risk of re-thrombosis in whom an extended secondary thromboprophylaxis should be carefully considered.     

Clinical and laboratory expression of associated thrombophilic conditions (homozygous/heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation and heterozygous prothrombin variant 20210A) in an Italian family.

Prothrombin variant 20210A is maintained to be a mild risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). The association of this defect with other inherited thrombophilic conditions may result in an increased risk of developing VTE. In this article, a family is described in which prothrombin variant was associated with either homozygous or heterozygous factor V Leiden (FV Leiden) mutation. All family members except the proband were asymptomatic despite the presence and the severity of the underlying genetic defect(s). The proband, who carried homozygous FV Leiden mutation and heterozygous prothrombin variant, experienced recurrent VTE during pregnancies, whereas one brother, with the same defect, was asymptomatic. Mean prothrombin antigen and activity levels were higher in carriers of the prothrombin variant as compared with noncarriers. Thrombin generation was assessed in family members, in carriers of prothrombin variant or homozygous FV Leiden mutation and in a control group. Most of the family members presented with increased prothrombin fragment 1+2 levels possibly because of the presence of the FV Leiden mutation. Although it is conceivable that the co-inheritance of prothrombin variant and FV Leiden mutation may increase the risk of VTE, patients with these combined defects may remain asymptomatic. It is likely that acquired triggering conditions play a major role in determining VTE in carriers of a mild genetic predisposition. This has to be taken into account when recommendation for thromboprophylaxis is given.     

Factor V Leiden: the venous thrombotic risk in thrombophilic families

Factor V Leiden (FVL) leads to a sevenfold increased risk of venous thrombosis and is present in 50% of individuals from families referred because of unexplained familial thrombophilia. We assessed the association of FVL with venous thromboembolism (VTE) in 12 thrombophilic families of symptomatic probands with FVL in a retrospective follow-up study. We screened 182 first- and second-degree relatives of the 12 unrelated propositi for the FVL mutation and the occurrence of VTE. The incidence rate of VTE in carriers of FVL (0.56%/year) was about six times the incidence for the Dutch population (0.1%/year). The incidence rate in non-carriers also appeared to be higher (0.15% per year). At the age of 50 years, the probability of not being affected by VTE was reduced to 75% for carriers and to 93% for non-carriers (P = 0.009). Identification of carriers of FV Leiden may be worthwhile in young symptomatic individuals and their relatives with a strong positive family history of venous thromboembolism or a history of recurrent venous thrombosis who may be at risk (e.g. pregnancy, use of oral contraceptives). After adjustment for prothrombin G20210A (present in two families), even higher thrombotic incidence rates were found in carriers and non-carriers of FVL. This makes the presence of other unknown prothrombotic risk factors more probable in these families.     

Genetic risk factors of thrombosis

Genetic risk factors became a frequent predisposing cause of venous thromboembolism (VTE) since the discovery of two mutations: factor V Leiden and G20210A mutation of prothrombin gene. One of these both mutations is associated with around 25% of VTE events. Interaction of genetic risk factors, such as interaction of FV Leiden or G20210A mutation of prothrombin with antithrombin, protein C or protein S deficiencies, as well as interaction with acquired risk factors, have demonstrated that venous thrombosis is a multifactorial disease. The search for thrombophilia must be done in VTE occurring before the age of 45, in case of recurrencies and in case of familial history of VTE.     

Coexistence of factor V G1691A and factor II G20210A gene mutations in a thrombotic family is associated with recurrence and early onset of venous thrombosis.

Two G-to-A mutations at positions 1691 of the factor V (FV) gene and 20210 of the prothrombin (FII) gene have been associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. We report a thrombosis-prone family in which one subject--the propositus who exhibited combined heterozygous FV G1691A and FII G20210A mutations--showed spontaneous and early clinical onset (at 23 years), recurrences of deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. His asymptomatic father carried the FII G20210A substitution and his mother, characterized by an isolated thrombotic episode on occasion of surgery (at 48 years), carried the FV G1691A substitution. In the maternal lineage, one of the propositus' uncles had thrombosis on occasion of a bone fracture (at 65 years) despite the absence of known prothrombotic defects. A sister of the propositus carried the FII G20210A and the brother the FV G1691A mutation. They have been asymptomatic until now. The propositus' two children, 20 and 16 years old, both carry the FV G1691A substitution and have been asymptomatic until now. The plasma levels of FII were higher in carriers of the FII G20210A allele if compared with noncarriers, and the activated protein C resistance phenotype, associated with the FV Leiden mutation, showed a complete correlation with the FV G1691A mutation. Despite the very limited number of thrombotic cases involved in this survey, which does not allow statistically sound conclusions, the data obtained from this family suggest that the synergy of inherited factors and transient risk conditions could play a key role in the occurrence of thrombotic accidents.     

Impact of the factor II: G20210A variant on the risk of venous thromboembolism in relatives from families with the factor V: R506Q mutation

OBJECTIVES: Factor V: R506Q mutation and the prothrombin G20210A variant (factor II: G20210A variant) are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In cohorts of unrelated patients a cosegregation of both mutations has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of developing VTE. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the coinheritance of both mutations on the risk of VTE in relatives of symptomatic carriers of the factor V: R506Q mutation and the factor II: G20210A variant. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four families with 48 family members were investigated for the presence of the factor V: R506Q mutation and the factor II: G20210A mutation, and their clinical history was evaluated. RESULTS: VTE was more frequent in family members with a combined defect (3/10; 30%) compared to those with a single mutation (1/16; 6%) or without a defect (1/12; 8%). The probability for VTE for 40-yr-old individuals with both mutations, a single mutation and no mutation was 56%, 12% and 20%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the G to A transition at position 20210 of the prothrombin gene leads to an increase in the risk of VTE in carriers of the factor V: R506Q mutation. The determination of the factor II: G20210A variant in index patients carrying a factor V: R506Q mutation and, if present, in family members may help to identify individuals who are at high risk for VTE.     

Increased Factor V Leiden frequency is associated with venous thrombotic events among young Brazilian patients

Introduction Of the inherited thrombophilias, the Factor V Leiden (FVL) and the prothrombin mutant (FII G20210A) are associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The C677T mutation of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene, which may lead to hyperhomocysteinemia, is also considered a risk factor for VTE in some studies. However, the frequency of these genetic risk factors may vary significantly among different populations. Material and methods The FVL, FII G20210A and C677T mutations were investigated by PCR-RFLP in 275 young VTE Brazilian patients as well as in 324 biologically unrelated individuals selected to compose the control group. Results The C677T mutation in the MTHFR gene was detected in 135 (49.1%) patients, of which 117 (42.5%) were identified as heterozygous and 18 (6.5%) as homozygous. The G20210A mutation was detected in 14 (5.1%) patients in heterozygosis. In both cases, no significant difference was observed when these results were compared to the frequencies observed in the control group. FVL was detected in heterozygosis in 19 (6.9%) patients, corresponding to a significantly increased frequency when compared to that observed for the control group (1.2%) (OR 5.9; 95% CI 2.08–16.79; p < 0.001). Conclusions The data indicated that FVL is significantly associated with VTE among young Brazilian patients, but also supported previous evidence that VTE is a multi-factorial disease, resulting from the interaction of genetic and acquired risk factors.     

The frequency of factor V Leiden and concomitance of factor V Leiden with prothrombin G20210A mutation and methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase C677T gene mutation in healthy population of Denizli, Aegean region of Turkey.

Factor V Leiden causing activated protein C resistance is the most common inherited form of thrombophilia leading to thrombosis. Its frequency shows great ethnic and geographic variations. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of FV Leiden and coinheritance of FV Leiden with two other frequent hereditary thrombophilia causes, namely, prothrombin G20210A and methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T mutation in the Aegean region of Turkey. The study population consisted of 1030 (500 men and 530 women) apparently healthy subjects. Functional resistance to activated protein C (APC) was measured by using the test kit STA staclot APC-R ((Diagnostica Stago, Asnieres, France, Cat. No. 00721). In subjects with APC resistance, molecular analyses of FV Leiden and of prothrombin G20210A and MTHFR C677T mutation were performed by using FV-PTH-MTHFR StripA (Vienna Lab, Labordiagnostika GmbH, Austria) kit, which was based on hybridization of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplified DNA products with mutation-specific oligonucleotide probes. Functional APC resistance was present in 93 subjects (9%). FV Leiden mutation was found in 87 of 93 subjects with APC resistance by PCR method. The FV Leiden carrier frequency was found to be 8.4% (87/1030). Seventy-six individuals were heterozygous (7.3%), and 11 were homozygous (1.06%). Among the 87 subjects with FV Leiden mutation, 45 subjects had MTHFR C677T gene mutation (7 homozygous, 38 heterozygous) and 4 subjects had heterozygote prothrombin G20210A gene mutation. A combination of FV Leiden and prothrombin G20210A and MTHFR C677T gene mutation was detected in 3 subjects. The results indicate that FV Leiden prevalence is quite high and coexistence of FV Leiden with other hereditary causes of thrombosis such as prothrombin G20210A mutation and MTHFR enzyme defect is not rare in healthy population of Aegean region of Turkey.     

Molecular analysis of factor V Leiden, factor V Hong Kong, factor II G20210A, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T, and A1298C mutations related to Turkish thrombosis patients.

Inherited gene disorders related to the hemostatic system have been documented as risk factors for thrombosis. The roles of factor V Hong Kong (FV Hong Kong), factor V Leiden (FV Leiden), factor II G20210A (FII G20210A), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T, and MTHFR A1298C mutations in Turkish patients with thrombosis (270 patients) compared with healthy controls (114 subjects) were evaluated. Polymerase chain reaction-based restriction enzyme analysis was carried out to screen these mutations, and single-strand conformation analysis was established to identify variations using the primers selected for restriction enzyme analysis studies. As a result, a significant relationship was determined among FV Leiden, FII G20210A, and thrombosis. The FV Hong Kong mutation was observed in only 2 patients with pulmonary vein thrombosis who are FV Leiden/FV Hong Kong compound heterozygous for FV gene. MTHFR C677T and A1298C were equally distributed in the patient group compared with the control group. All named mutations were also identified with single-strand conformation analysis, but a new variant/polymorphism during studies was not found. Because some inherited abnormalities are associated with thromboembolic disorders, determining the mutations and gene-to-gene interactions in patients with thrombosis history has a great impact on diagnosis and treatment of these diseases.     

Lipoprotein (a) and genetic polymorphisms of clotting factor V, prothrombin, and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase are risk factors of spontaneous ischemic stroke in childhood

Ischemic stroke is a rare event in childhood. In approximately one third of cases no obvious underlying cause or disorder can be detected. We investigated the importance of genetic risk factors of venous thromboembolism in childhood or stroke in adulthood as risk factors for spontaneous ischemic stroke in children. One hundred forty-eight Caucasian infants and children (aged 0.5 to 16 years) with stroke and 296 age-matched controls from the same geographic areas as the patients were analyzed for increased lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] levels >30 mg/dL; for the presence of the factor V (FV) G1691A mutation, the prothrombin (PT) G20210A variant, and the TT677 genotype of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR); and deficiencies of protein C, protein S, and antithrombin. The following frequencies (patients v controls), odds ratios (ORs), and confidence intervals (CIs) of single risk factors were found: Lp(a) >30 mg/dL (26.4% v 4.7%; OR/CI, 7.2/3.8 to 13.8; P <.0001), FV G1691A (20.2% v 4%; OR/CI, 6/2.97 to 12.1; P <.0001), protein C deficiency (6% v 0.67%; OR/CI, 9.5/2 to 44.6; P =.001), PT G20210A (6% v 1.3%; OR/CI, 4.7/1.4 to 15.6; P =.01), and the MTHFR TT677 genotype (23.6% v 10.4%; OR/CI, 2.4/1.53 to 4.5; P <.0001). A combination of the heterozygous FV G1691A mutation with increased Lp(a) (n = 11) or the MTHFR TT677 genotype (n = 5) was found in 10. 8% of cases, but only 0.3% of controls (OR/CI, 35.75/4.7 to 272; P <. 0001). Increased Lp (a) levels, the FV G1691A mutation, protein C deficiency, the prothrombin G20210A variant, and the MTHFR TT677 are important risk factors for spontaneous ischemic stroke in childhood.     

Incidence of venous thromboembolism in asymptomatic family members who are carriers of factor V Leiden: a prospective cohort study

In a prospective cohort study, we assessed the incidence of spontaneous and risk period-related venous thromboembolism (VTE) in asymptomatic family members of patients who experienced VTE and had the factor V Leiden mutation. In all, 561 family members of 131 probands were included, 313 of whom were carriers (299 heterozygous and 14 homozygous) and 248 of whom were noncarriers of the factor V Leiden mutation. Average follow-up was 4 years (range, 4 months-6 years). There were 1255 and 984 observation-years of follow-up in carriers and noncarriers, respectively. Eight episodes of VTE occurred in heterozygous carriers, resulting in an annual incidence of 0.67% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-1.33). Two events occurred in the absence of associated risk factors, determining an annual incidence of spontaneous VTE of 0.17% (95% CI, 0.02-0.6). Only one VTE (risk period-related) occurred in noncarriers, with an annual incidence of 0.1% (95% CI, 0.003-0.56). Relative risk for VTE in heterozygous carriers compared with noncarriers of the factor V Leiden mutation was 6.6 (95% CI, 1.1-39.8). Risk period-related VTE occurred with an incidence of 18% and 5% per risk period in heterozygous carriers and in noncarriers, respectively. Thus, the low rate of VTE in asymptomatic family members carrying the mutation did not justify continuous anticoagulant prophylaxis. Screening families of symptomatic probands with the factor V Leiden mutation has the potential to identify those asymptomatic carriers who might benefit from thromboprophylaxis during risk periods.     

Coexistence of prothrombic risk factors and its relation to left ventricular thrombus in acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE: Within the last few years a number of thrombophilic mutations have been identified. Pre-symptomatic testing for these established genetic risk factors identifies individuals predisposed to a disease and often allows to select suitable prophylactic interventions in time. We investigated whether or not the prothrombin G20210A allele, the factor V Leiden G1691A, and MTHFR C677T allele are risk factors for left ventricular thrombus (LV) in patients with myocardial infarction (AMI) or not. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed clinical, echocardiographic and biochemical data in 183 consecutive patients (aged 58 +/- 12 years; 34 women) with a first anterior acute myocardial infarction. Two-dimensional echocardiographic examination was performed on days 1, 3, 7, 15, and 30. LV thrombi were detected in 42 (23%) of the 183 patients with acute myocardial infarction. We have used multiplex assays based on PCR and DNA hybridization in microtitre plates for the simultaneous analysis of three mutations (FV Leiden G1691A, prothrombin G20210A, and MTHFR C677T). No significant differences in allele frequencies of FV Leiden G1691A (9.5% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.75), prothrombin G20210A (9.5% vs 7.1%, p = 0.74) and MTHFR C677T (47.6% vs. 50.3%, p = 0.74) were found in patients with LV thrombus when compared with those without LV thrombus. No significant differences in haemostatic factor levels were found in patients with LV thrombus when compared with those without LV thrombus. CONCLUSION: FV Leiden, prothrombin 20210 variant, and MTHFR mutation are no risk factors for left ventricular thrombus in patients with myocardial infarction.The presence of multiple mutations did not influence the development and outcome of LV thrombus in patients with myocardial infarction     

The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in heterozygous carriers of factor V Leiden and a first spontaneous venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND: Factor V (FV) Leiden is a risk factor for venous thrombosis (VT). Data on its influence on the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) are controversial owing to different study designs and patient cohorts. METHODS: We reevaluated the risk of recurrence among heterozygous carriers and noncarriers of FV Leiden with a first spontaneous proximal VT of the leg and/or pulmonary embolism. Patients with secondary VTE, homozygous FV Leiden, natural inhibitor deficiencies, lupus anticoagulant, cancer, or long-term anticoagulation were excluded. The study end point was objectively documented, symptomatic, recurrent VTE. RESULTS: After discontinuation of oral anticoagulant therapy for a first VTE, we prospectively observed 287 patients, 83 (29%) of whom were heterozygous for FV Leiden. Recurrent VTE was seen in 17 (20%) of 83 patients with and 44 (21.6%) of 204 without FV Leiden. The probability of recurrence among heterozygotes was 12% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8%-16%), 27% (95% CI, 21%-33%), and 27% (95% CI, 21%-33%) after 2, 4, and 6 years, respectively, and was not higher than that among patients without the mutation (16%, 23%, and 34%, respectively). The relative risk of recurrence in heterozygotes was 0.9 (95% CI, 0.5-1.6; P =.60) after adjustment for confounding variables. The risk of recurrence among patients with and without FV Leiden was not different when sex distribution or duration of anticoagulation therapy was taken into account. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of recurrence is similar among carriers and noncarriers of FV Leiden. Heterozygous patients should receive secondary thromboprophylaxis for a similar length of time as patients without FV Leiden.     

Prevalence of factor V Leiden G1691A, MTHFR C677T, and prothrombin G20210A among Asian Indian sickle cell patients

The prevalence of factor V (FV) Leiden G1691A, prothrombin G20210A, and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T mutations were investigated among 90 sickle trait, 61 sickle homozygous, 75 sickle beta thalassemia, and 15 HbSD Asian Indian sickle cell patients. In all, 297 healthy controls were evaluated to compare the polymorphism frequency. The prevalence of FV Leiden heterozygous G>A were significant in the group (P = .02), while PRT G20210A polymorphism was not seen among patients as well as controls. However, an increased frequency of the MTHFR 677 C>T genotype was seen among patients as well as controls, but this was not statistically significant (P = .13). This suggested a low impact of inherited hypercoagulability risk factors in the pathogenesis of sickle cell disease and/or its complications.     

G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene and the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism

OBJECTIVES: The study was done to determine whether the G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene increases the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), both alone and in combination with factor V Leiden. BACKGROUND: Several inherited defects of coagulation are associated with increased risk of first VTE, including a recently identified G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene. However, whether the presence of this mutation confers an increased risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism is controversial. METHODS: A total of 218 men with incident venous thromboembolism were genotyped for the prothrombin mutation and for factor V Leiden and were followed prospectively for recurrent VTE over a follow-up period of 7.3 years. RESULTS: A total of 29 men (13.3%) suffered recurrent VTE. Five of the 14 carriers of the prothrombin mutation developed recurrent VTE (35.7%; incidence rate = 8.70 per 100 person-years), while 24 of 204 individuals who did not carry the prothrombin mutation developed recurrent VTE (11.8%; incidence rate = 1.76 per 100 person-years). Thus, presence of the G20210A mutation was associated with an approximate fivefold increased risk for recurrent VTE (crude relative risk [RR] 4.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-12.9; p = 0.001; age-, smoking-, and body mass index-adjusted RR 5.28; 95% CI 2.0-14.0; p = 0.001). In these data, recurrence rates were similar among those with an isolated mutation in the prothrombin gene (18.2%) as compared to those with an isolated factor V Leiden mutation (19.2%). However, all three study participants who carried both mutations (100%) suffered a recurrent event during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective evaluation of 218 men, the presence ofprothrombin mutation was associated with a significantly increased risk of recurrent VTE, particularly among those who co-inherited factor V Leiden.     

Do hospital doctors test for thrombophilia in patients with venous thromboembolism?

The predictive value of factor V Leiden and the G20210A prothrombin mutation regarding recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) is limited and does not influence subsequent patient management. Systematic testing for such genetic thrombophilia should be avoided, but to which extent such testing is practiced in a Swiss Hospital is unknown. To examine the current practice of factor V Leiden and/or G20210A prothrombin mutation testing in a University Hospital, and to assess the clinical consequences of testing on patients. 1388 adult patients (48.7% women) with a main diagnosis of VTE hospitalized at the Lausanne university hospital between January 2013 and December 2015. FV Leiden and/or prothrombin G20210A mutation testing was performed in 61 (4.4%) patients with VTE, an average of 20 patients/year. On multivariable analysis, age <?65 years [odds ratio and (95% confidence interval) 5.91 (3.12–11.19)], being admitted in a medical ward [5.71 (2.02–16.16)] and staying in the intensive care unit [0.34 (0.12–0.97)] were associated with thrombophilia testing. No differences were found between patients with and without testing regarding in-hospital mortality [OR and 95% CI for tested vs. non-tested: 0.23 (0.03–1.73), p?=?0.153] and length of stay (multivariable adjusted average?±?standard error: 16.9?±?3.3 vs. 20.0?±?0.7 days for tested and non-tested patients, respectively, p?=?0.875). Thrombophilia testing in hospitalized patients with a main diagnosis of VTE is seldom performed. FV Leiden and/or prothrombin G20210A mutation should not be routinely assessed in patients with acute VTE.