Immunity to influenza virus infection induced by heterologous,inactivated vaccines

The ability of inactivated influenza A vaccines to induce serum HI antibody and immunity to challenge infection was studied in hamsters and in volunteers. Groups of hamsters were immunized with 200 IU of influenza virus A/Scotland/74, A/Port Chalmers/73, A/England/72, or A/Hong Kong/68. The serum HI antibody response of animals to, and immunity to challenge infection was directly related to the known relationship between the vaccine and test viruses. Thus, hamsters given A/Hong Kong/68 or A/England/72 vaccine produced serum HI antibody and immunity to A/Hong Kong virus infection, and animals given A/Scotland/74, A/Port Chalmers/73, and A/England/72 produced antibody and immunity to A/Scotland infection.In a volunteer study, groups of students were immunized with 400 IU of the same vaccines as used above. The ability to infect these volunteers with WRL 105 virus given 4 weeks later was directly related to the vaccine-induced serum HI antibody to the challenge virus. The highest titers of serum HI antibody to A/Scotland virus were found in volunteers inoculated with homologous vaccine, lower titers were found in volunteers given A/Port Chalmers or A/England/ 72 vaccine and the lowest levels were seen in volunteers given A/Hong Kong/68 vaccine: the largest number of infections by the challenge virus was seen in volunteers given A/Hong Kong/68 vaccine, less were observed in volunteers given A/England/72 vaccine, and least were found in groups given A/Port Chalmers or A/Scotland/74 vaccine. Compared with the incidence of infection in volunteers given B/Hong Kong/73 vaccine, all groups given heterologous influenza A vaccines showed some immunity to challenge infection.     

Immunity to influenza in Ferrets

Summary Ferrets inoculated with 300 CCA of inactivated influenza A2/Hong Kong virus vaccine did not produce serum HI antibody, and were completely susceptible to subsequent infection with live A2/Hong Kong virus. Immunization of ferrets with A2/Hong Kong vaccine in Al(OH)₃ induced low levels of serum HI antibody; these animals showed a slightly reduced febrile reaction and reduced titres of virus were recovered from nasal washings following challenge virus infection. Ferrets immunized with inactivated A2/Hong Kong vaccine in Freund's incomplete adjuvant produced relatively high titres of serum HI antibody, but did not produce local antibody detectable in nasal washings. After challenge infection, these animals showed a modified febrile reaction, lower titres of virus were recovered from nasal washings and nasal symptoms were reduced. These results, together with results of similar studies, indicated that the degree of immunity to challenge virus infection was related to the titre of serum HI antibody. However, none of the methods used to induce serum HI antibody gave as solid an immunity as found following live virus infection, although immunization could induce levels of serum HI antibody comparable to that found following virus infection.     

A contribution of cellular immunity to protection against influenza in man

The degree of lymphocyte transformations and leukocyte migration inhibition (LMI) in the presence of inactivated A/Scotland/74 (H3N2) influenza virus vaccine was measured in blood samples collected from 56 medical student volunteers. At the same time the volunteers were skin tested, using the same vaccine. Using the antigenically similar WRL 105 (H3N2), recombinant influenza virus, the level of haemagglutination-inhibiting (HI) antibodies in serum, and neutralizing antibodies in nasal washings collected from the volunteers, were also determined. Each volunteer was then inoculated with live, attenuated WRL 105 influenza virus vaccine and infections demonstrated by virus isolations and serology.Correlations between the ability to infect the volunteers and the various parameters of humoral and cellular immunity were then determined. The results showed a good correlation between the level of serum HI antibody and infection. Thus 16 of 20 volunteers with serum HI antibody titres of 110, but only 6 of 20 volunteers with antibody levels of 130, showed evidence of infection. No direct correlation was observed between any of the other parameters measured and infection by WRL 105 virus. However, when the LMI and serum HI antibody levels were considered together, a contribution of cellular immunity, as measured by the LMI test, could be found. Of 19 volunteers with low serum HI antibody and low LMI levels, 16 were infected, whereas of 13 volunteers with low HI antibody, but with high LMI levels, only 6 showed evidence of infection with WRL 105 influenza virus.     

Immunity to Influenza in Ferrets: I. Response to Live and Killed Virus

Ferrets were found to react with a sharp febrile response to intranasal infection with influenza virus A2/Hong Kong/3/68. Virus was recovered from nasal washings taken 3 days after infection, and virus antibody was found in serum specimens taken 21 days after virus infection. Virus infection produced a pronounced rhinitis; the protein concentration in nasal washings was found to increase three to five-fold with peak levels occurring on day 7, post-infection. Concomitant with the increased protein levels, detectable levels of HI and neutralizing antibody were found in the nasal washings. However, nasal washings taken 13 days or more after influenza virus infection did not contain either increased levels of protein or detectable antibody. These ferrets were immune to re-infection with homologous virus inoculated 5 weeks after primary infection. Thus, ferrets showed no febrile response; virus was not recovered from nasal washings; serum antibody titres did not increase; no increase in protein levels was found in nasal washings; and HI antibody was not found in nasal washings.Using these criteria to assess susceptibility or immunity to influenza virus infection, infection with attenuated influenza virus A2/Hong Kong/1/68 produced immunity to re-infection with virulent virus. Ferrets infected with influenza virus B/England/13/65 or immunized with killed A2/Hong Kong virus did not induce any immunity to infection with influenza virus A2/Hong Kong/3/68.     

The immune response of hamsters to purified haemagglutinins and whole influenza virus vaccines following live influenza virus infection

The ability of several, live type A influenza viruses to enhance the serum haemagglutination-inhibiting (HI) antibody response of hamsters to subsequent immunization with inactivated, heterotypic influenza virus vaccines was examined. Live influenza viruses were found to vary in their priming ability for a given vaccine, and a given virus was not able to prime for all inactivated vaccines to an equal extent. Common determinants in the haemagglutinin antigens of the priming virus and the vaccine virus were suggested as responsible for the enhancement of the antibody response to some of the vaccines, but for other pairs of viruses the haemagglutinin antigens were distinct. Thus, enhancement in these instances cannot be due to cross-reacting haemagglutinins. Pre-infection of hamsters by several influenza type A viruses was employed in an attempt to enhance the serum HI antibody response to purified, haemagglutinin antigens prepared from A/PR/8/34 and the MRC-2 recombinant strain of A/England/42/72 viruses. Although prior infection enhanced the antibody response to whole virus, this was not demonstrable for the purified haemagglutinin components of the virus. The possible reasons for this are discussed.     

Immunity to Influenza in Ferrets: II. Influence of Adjuvants on Immunization

Immunization of ferrets with a single intramuscular inoculation of killed A2/Hong Kong virus did not induce serum or nasal antibody, and these animals were found to be completely susceptible to subsequent infection with virulent influenza virus A2/Hong Kong/3/68. A similar result was found for ferrets immunized with 2 inoculations of killed virus vaccine given 2 weeks apart. Ferrets immunized with killed A2/Hong Kong virus in conjunction with Bordetella pertussis produced relatively low levels of serum HI antibody to A2/Hong Kong virus; when infected with virulent influenza virus, these ferrets showed a modified reaction, with a less marked febrile reaction than was observed for non-immunized animals.Immunization of ferrets with killed A2/Hong Kong virus in Freund''s complete adjuvant resulted in the production of relatively high levels of serum HI antibody, but no detectable nasal antibody. These animals were shown to be partially immune to subsequent infection with virulent influenza virus. However, although the serum antibody levels of these animals following immunization was comparable to that found following infection with live virus, the degree of immunity to infection with virulent influenza virus was measurably less.     

A clinical trial with Alice/R-75 strain,live attenuated serum inhibitor-resistant intranasal bivalent influenza A/B vaccine

A clinical trial was conducted with Alice/R-75 strain live attenuated intranasal influenza A/B vaccine. With double blind control 88 adult volunteers were administered 2 doses of Alice/R-75 vaccine, 93 volunteers received one dose of Alice/R-75 vaccine and one dose placebo solution and 94 subjects were administered 2 doses of placebo solution. Twenty-three other subjects received Alice strain monovalent influenza A vaccine. For comparison, data from 21 subjects who received monovalent intranasal R-75 strain influenza B in two doses is included. The vaccine was generally well tolerated. Four-fold serum hemagglutination-inhibiting (HAI) antibody titer rises to A/England/42/72 occurred in 39% of the monovalent Alice strain vaccinees; in contrast 18% of those given 2 doses of bivalent Alice/R-75 vaccine and 11% of those given 1 dose of bivalent vaccine had similar four-fold HAI antibody titer rises. HAI antibody titer rises to influenza B/Hong Kong/72 occurred in 38% of R-75 strain monovalent vaccinees, 14% of Alice/R-75 2-dose vaccinees and 11% of Alice/R-75 one dose vaccinees. An epidemic of influenza at the onset of the study made evaluation of the efficacy of the vaccine impossible.This study was supported by a grant from Smith, Kline and French Laboratories, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania     

E-rosette forming cells and humoral antibody titres in humans after vaccination with three different inactivated influenza virus vaccines A/USSR/92/77 (H1N1)

The number of E-rosette forming cells and the serum haemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titres were examined in 37 volunteers immediately before and 14, 28, 35 and 63 days after immunization with three inactivated influenza virus vaccines A/USSR/92/77 (H1N1)--NIB 6 and in 11 non-vaccinated controls. From the former, 10 volunteers were immunized with 1000 haemagglutinin (HA) IU per dose, 11 volunteers with the NIB 6 adsorbate vaccine (340 HA IU/dose) and 16 volunteers with a bivalent vaccine composed of 180 HA IU/dose NIB 6 and 180 HA IU/dose of influenza virus A/Bangkok X-73 (H3N2). The percentage of E-rosette forming cells was decreased in all vaccinated volunteers 14 days after vaccination; later on the values reached normal level of non-vaccinated controls or of subjects before vaccination. The number of E-rosette forming cells was in correlation with the applied virus vaccine dose, i.e. for the 1000 HA IU/dose: 29.95 +/- 11.74%, p less than 0.001 and for the 340 HA IU/dose: 47.75 +/- 11.15%, p less than 0.005; however, after administration of 180 HA IU/dose of NIB 6 in the bivalent vaccine, the value 58.65 +/- 11.5% was not significantly decreased in comparison to non-vaccinated donors. The serum HI antibody titres reached the highest level 14 days after vaccination and remained constant during the next 6 weeks. There was a correlation between decreased E-rosette values and increased serum antibody titres (p less than 0.05). The current study indicates that the number of E-rosette forming cells may serve as a further laboratory criterion for controlling the effect of inactivated influenza virus vaccines on the immune system of man.     

Influenza virus infection of the guinea pig: Immune response and resistance

Guinea pigs were inoculated by intranasal inoculation with unadapted, influenza virus A/England/42/72, and virus was recovered from nasal washings between 3 and 10 days post-inoculation. Infected animals did not exhibit a febrile response to infection, did not produce local antibody and produced only relatively low levels of serum antibody. However, they developed delayed-type hypersensitivity to influenza virus, demonstrable by both skin tests and macrophage migration inhibition tests, which was similar to that of man. The relevance of the influenza virus specific delayed hypersensitivity in immunity to infection was examined in this model. Guinea pigs previously infected with virus or passively immunized with hyperimmune serum were relatively resistant to reinfection with influenza virus A/England/42/72. Inoculation of guinea pigs with spleen cells from immune donor animals, together with or without immune serum, did not give or enhance resistance to challenge virus infection. The results do not suggest a role for delayed hypersensitivity response in immunity to influenza virus infection.     

Antibody reactive in antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity following influenza virus vaccination

The antibody reactive in antibody-dependent, cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) to influenza virus-infected cells was measured in two groups of seven volunteers each, before and after immunization with inactivated or live attenuated A/Victoria/3/75 influenza virus vaccines. Age-matched controls were seven adult individuals who experienced natural influenza infection due to A/Victoria/3/75-like virus strain. After inactivated whole influenza virus immunization all the subjects showed a significant rise of the antibody reactive in ADCC (from a mean value of 4.7% to 17.1% cytotoxicity, before and 5 weeks after immunization, respectively) as well as of hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody (fourfold or greater increase). These immune responses were similar to those observed among naturally infected controls. After live attenuated virus vaccination, no significant increase in titer of antibody reactive in ADCC was detected, even though the vaccine induced significant increase of HI antibody titer. Little correlation was found between ADCC and HI antibody rises in sera of recipients of inactivated virus vaccine and of naturally infected individuals, while, in live attenuated influenza virus vaccinees, the rise of HI antibody titer did not correspond to a significant increase of ADCC antibody titer; several subjects who developed a significant rise in ADCC antibody titer did not show significant variation in antibody to neuraminidase and/or to complement fixation influenza virus antigens.     

Immunity to Influenza in Ferrets X. Intranasal Immunization of Ferrets with Inactivated Influenza A Virus Vaccines

The response of ferrets after intranasal inoculation of inactivated A/Hong Kong/68 (H3N2) influenza virus vaccines is reported. Normal ferrets given either saline vaccine in drops or freeze-dried vaccine in an aerosol intranasally did not produce detectable serum or nasal hemagglutination inhibiting antibody and were found to be completely susceptible to challenge infection with A/Hong Kong/68 virus. Intranasal saline vaccine did not produce an additive effect on the response of ferrets simultaneously given the same vaccine intramuscularly with adjuvant. Ferrets primed by previous infection with A/PR/8/34 (H0N1) influenza virus, however, responded to intranasal immunization with saline A/Hong Kong/68 virus vaccine and produced serum and nasal antibody. These animals were found to be partially resistant to challenge infection, in contrast to similar animals given saline vaccine intramuscularly which were completely resistant to challenge infection. Primed ferrets did not respond after immunization with the freeze-dried aerosol vaccine, but this may have been due to a failure of the aerosol to be inhaled satisfactorily.     

Attenuated influenza A vaccine (Alice) in an adult population: vaccine-related illness, serum and nasal antibody production, and intrafamily transmission.

Ninety-five healthy adults, ages 18 to 56 years, received two intranasal doses, 2 weeks apart, of a live, attenuated, influenza type A (H3N2) vaccine (an inhibitor-resistant recombinant strain of A/England/42/72 named "Alice"). Ninety-two persons were given placebos similarly. Ninety-three percent of 68 subjects with initial serum hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) titers of greater than or equal to 1:40 to influenza A (H3N2) had a fourfold or greater antibody increase in postvaccination sera. Forty-four percent of 27 subjects with an initial HI titer of greater than or equal to 1:80 had similar increases. Overall, 77% of vaccinees had fourfold or greater antibody titer increases. Vaccinees had geometric mean serum HI titers (GMT) of 1:26, 1:123, and 1:166 at 0, 14, and 30 days, respectively. The GMTs for placebos were 1:21, 1:22, and 1:21. Thirty-five vaccinees were examined for both serum and nasal antibody; 89% had significant increases in one or both. Nasal antibody response was directly related to the level of initial serum HI titer in that 83% of 12 persons with prevaccination HI titers of 1:80 greater than or equal to 1:80 showed significant nasal antibody rises, whereas only 61% of the remaining 23 subjects with prevaccination HI titers of less than or equal to 1:40 did so. The number and severity of clinical signs and symptoms reported by vaccinees and placebos did not differ significantly. The greatest differences noted between groups were for nasal congestion on days 0 to 6 (8.3%) and rhinitis on days 14 to 20 (5.9%). Four vaccinees shed Alice after primary vaccination, but viral titers were low (10 to 100 tissue culture-infective doses/ml). One member in each of 15 cohabiting male-female couples received Alice while the other received a placebo; one of the placebo members had significant increases in serum and nasal antibody, indicating a possible transmission.     

In elderly persons live attenuated influenza A virus vaccines do not offer an advantage over inactivated virus vaccine in inducing serum or secretory antibodies or local immunologic memory.

In a double-blind, randomized trial, 102 healthy elderly subjects were inoculated with one of four preparations: (i) intranasal bivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine containing cold-adapted A/Kawasaki/86 (H1N1) and cold-adapted A/Bethesda/85 (H3N2) viruses; (ii) parenteral trivalent inactivated subvirion vaccine containing A/Taiwan/86 (H1N1), A/Leningrad/86 (H3N2), and B/Ann Arbor/86 antigens; (iii) both vaccines; or (iv) placebo. To determine whether local or systemic immunization augmented mucosal immunologic memory, all volunteers were challenged intranasally 12 weeks later with the inactivated virus vaccine. We used a hemagglutination inhibition assay to measure antibodies in sera and a kinetic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA antibodies in sera and nasal washes, respectively. In comparison with the live virus vaccine, the inactivated virus vaccine elicited higher and more frequent rises of serum antibodies, while nasal wash antibody responses were similar. The vaccine combination induced serum and local antibodies slightly more often than the inactivated vaccine alone did. Coadministration of live influenza A virus vaccine did not alter the serum antibody response to the influenza B virus component of the inactivated vaccine. The anamnestic nasal antibody response elicited by intranasal inactivated virus challenge did not differ in the live, inactivated, or combined vaccine groups from that observed in the placebo group not previously immunized. These results suggest that in elderly persons cold-adapted influenza A virus vaccines offer little advantage over inactivated virus vaccines in terms of inducing serum or secretory antibody or local immunological memory. Studies are needed to determine whether both vaccines in combination are more efficacious than inactivated vaccine alone in people in this age group.     

Immune Response to Vaccination with a Live Influenza Virus (H3N2) Vaccine (“Ann” Strain)

A live attenuated influenza virus ("Ann" strain) derived from A/England/878/69 was given intranasally to a group of volunteers, most of whom had already circulating antibodies against H(3)N(2) viruses at the time of inoculation. There was a fourfold or higher increase of circulating hemagglutination-inhibiting antibodies in those volunteers who had relatively low initial titers. The response was lower in those with initially higher serum titers. The pattern of the serum neutralizing antibody response was very similar. The geometric means of the antineuraminidase antibodies were 67 and 118 pre- and postvaccination, respectively. All subjects showed a rise in local neutralizing antibodies in their nasal secretions with geometric means of 4 and 17 pre- and postvaccination, respectively. The levels of local antineuraminidase antibodies also rose in most subjects. In addition to the response to the homologous virus type, the antibody formation to the recent A/England/42/72 was measured in the sera and nasal secretions of some subjects. There was a clearcut response in most of the sera and in all of the secretions examined. The stimulation of circulating lymphocytes was measured in 6 volunteers. All volunteers showed a temporary stimulation. The stimulation index ranged between 2.5 and 28.5.     

Rubella Immunization of Volunteers Via the Respiratory Tract

The efficacy of various routes of administration of the live attenuated rubella virus vaccine was evaluated by using 46 seronegative volunteers who were divided into 4 vaccine groups: subcutaneous, nosedrops, spray into posterior oropharynx and nose using large particle aerosol, and inhalation of small particle aerosol through the mouth. Seroconversion was observed in all of the vaccinees regardless of route of immunization. Nasal secretion antibody 6 weeks after immunization was highest in the volunteers who received the vaccine by nose drops (all members of this group had demonstrable nasal secretion antibody after immunization). Only half of the volunteers in the subcutaneous group developed demonstrable nasal secretion antibody. This suggests that nasal secretion antibody was best stimulated when vaccine was given directly into the nose. Volunteers were challenged with the vaccine intranasally at 6 to 8 weeks. None of the volunteers exhibited clinical symptoms or fourfold or greater serum antibody rises after challenge, but fourfold or greater nasal secretion antibody rises were observed in three volunteers in the subcutaneous vaccine group and two in the aerosol group, suggesting that those volunteers had not been protected against challenge. Rubella virus was isolated 8 to 12 days after challenge in two persons in the subcutaneous group and three in the aerosol vaccine group, but none in the nose drops or spray groups. Thus, protection after nasal challenge appeared to be best in those groups which also had the best nasal secretion antibody response after immunization. However, protection did not seem to be correlated with either nasal secretion or serum antibody levels.     

Immunological potency of a subunit influenza vaccine in adults

Summary The immunological potency of a subunit influenza vaccine (from A/England/42/72 virus) and of two commercial whole-virus vaccines (containing either A/England/42/72 or A/Hong Kong/68 virus) was studied in adults in an industrial plant. Serum samples were taken in vaccinated and control non-vaccinated subjects prior to and three weeks and five months after the vaccination. Most of the vaccinees developed high levels of hemagglutination inhibiting antibodies against all the type A influenza viruses employed in the test; these antigens included a new strain (A/Dunedin/73) that had not previously circulated in Czechoslovakia. The antibody response after the subunit vaccine was somewhat better than after the whole-virus vaccines administration. The whole-virus vaccine from the A/England/42/72 virus was more efficient in inducing antibody response against the more recent isolates than the A/Hong Kong/68 virus vaccine.     

The immune response to influenza vaccines

Specific immunity to influenza is associated with a systemic immune response (serum haemagglutination inhibition antibody), local respiratory immune response (virus-specific local IgA and IgG antibodies in nasal wash), and with the cell-mediated immune response. Both inactivated and live influenza vaccines induce virus-specific serum antibody which can protect against infection with influenza virus possessing the same antigenic specificity. In the absence of serum antibodies, local antibodies in nasal wash are a major determinant of resistance to infection with influenza virus. In comparative studies in humans it was shown that nasal secretory IgA develops chiefly after immunization with live cold-adapted (CA) vaccine, but persistent nasal secretory IgG was detected in both CA live and inactivated vaccines. The origin of nasal wash haemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibodies is not completely known. Recently it was found that cytotoxic T-cells (CTL) play an important role in immunity against influenza and in clearance of influenza virus from the body. In primed humans, inactivated influenza vaccine stimulates a cross-reactive T-cell response, whereas the ability of inactivated vaccine to stimulate such immunity in unprimed humans has not been determined. Data on the T-cell response to live vaccine in humans are limited to the development of secondary T-cell responses in primed individuals vaccinated with a host-range (HR) attenuated vaccine. The data obtained have shown that immunity induced by inactivated influenza vaccines is presumably dependent on the stimulation of serum antibody. Live CA vaccines not only stimulate a durable serum antibody response, but also induce long-lasting local respiratory tract IgA antibody that plays an important role in host protection.     

The significance of hemolysing-inhibiting antibodies in protection against measles

The occurence of hemagglutinating-inhibiting (HI), hemolysinginhibiting (HLI) and nucleocapsid complement fixing (NC-CF) antibodies in serum samples from individuals immunized with measles virus antigens under various conditions was analyzed. After regular measles infections all three kinds of antibodies were detectable and removal of HI antibodies by absorption with Tween 80 and ether treated virus material only caused an about 2-fold reduction of titers of HLI antibodies. Immunization with further attenuated measles vaccine also induced a production of antibodies detectable in the three different tests. However the response of non-HI HLI antibodies and NC-CF antibodies was relatively less pronounced than after regular measles. Immunization with three or four doses of Tween 80 ether treated inactivated measles vaccine caused a production of HI antibodies and in some cases NC-CF antibodies. Non-HI HLI antibodies were not detectable. The combined immunization with inactivated vaccine followed by further attenuated live vaccine caused the appearance of high titers of HI antibodies but in contrast to the situation of administration of only live vaccine non-HI HLI antibodies were not detectable. The significance of non-HI HLI antibodies in protection against disease also was indicated by observations on the reactions of individuals immunized with inactivated vaccine and subsequently exposed to wild measles virus. The non-HI HLI antibody response was poorer in the vaccinees who contracted a complicated infection as compared to those who had only a subclinical or a mitigated infection. An accentuated non-HI HLI antibody and NC-CF antibody response was seen in patients with subacute sclerosing panencephalitis. It is proposed that the failure of hitherto used inactivated measles vaccines is due to the absence of certain envelope antigens in the preparations which leads to a deficiency as concerns the capacity to induce a production of non-HI HLI antibodies.     

Live tissue culture influenza vaccine for oral administration. I. Specific immune response to monovaccine A (H3N2) in volunteers.

Oral immunization of volunteers with a live tissue culture influenza A (H3N2) vaccine induced an increase in virus neutralizing (VN), haemagglutination inhibiting (HI) and neuraminidase inhibiting (NI) antibody. The dynamics of antibody and IgM and IgG immunoglobulin formation in the blood depended to a great extent on their prevaccination levels. The highest per cent of seroconversions was observed after the 3rd vaccination: a 4-fold or greater rise of VN antibody was found in 80% (titre increase by 3.0 log2 units), of HI antibody in 70% (titre increase by 2.6 log2 units) and NI antibody in 73% (titre increased by 2.5 log2 units) of the volunteers. The level of IgG increased after each vaccination but its highest level did not coincide in time with the maximum antibody production. High titres of the antibodies studied were recorded 1-2 months after the 3rd vaccination, irrespective of their prevaccination levels.     

Age-dependent antibody response in mice and humans following oral influenza immunization

In order to compare the antibody response in serum and secretions from healthy young subjects and the elderly (>60 years), volunteers were immunized with the commercial inactivated influenza virus vaccine, by the usual (parenteral) route or orally. Also, young and old mice (mean age, 20 months) were orally immunized with live influenza virus. The older mice responded with a very slight rise in their serum and respiratory tract antibody levels compared with the young mice but showed no diminution in protection against lethal viral challenge. Elderly volunteers showed only slight serum antibody responses after parenteral immunization compared with the young. Neither group demonstrated a rise in serum antibody following oral immunization. With respect to the secretory IgA (SIgA) antibody response, certain differences were noted between the young and the elderly: the preimmunization levels of antibody to influenza virus were significantly greater in nasal secretions and saliva in the elderly as compared to the young volunteers, and the salivary antibody response was diminished in the elderly. This lack of a salivary antibody response in the elderly was explicable by the inverse relationship between the preimmunization SIgA antibody titers and the response to immunization. Oral immunization led to no more side effects than observed in the placebo control group.