The fast-slow form of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children

An unusual form of atrioventricular (A-V) nodal reentry is described as the underlying mechanism for incessant tachycardia in two children. During tachycardia a fast pathway was utilized for anterograde conduction and a slow pathway for retrograde conduction. This is the reverse of the usual form of A-V nodal reentrant tachycardia, in which the slow pathway is utilized for anterograde conduction and the fast pathway for retrograde conduction. One patient had a smooth ventriculoatrial (V-A) conduction curve demonstrating exclusive utilization of the slow pathway for retrograde conduction. The other had a discontinuous V-A conduction curve demonstrating failure of retrograde fast pathway conduction with resultant slow pathway conduction. In both cases the retrograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway was longer than that of the slow pathway, resulting in the establishment of this unusual reentry circuit. Both patients had a superior P axis with a P-R interval shorter than the R-P interval during tachycardia, features described in a significant number of children with incessant tachycardia. This unusual form of reentrant tachycardia can be suggested by its electrocardiographic pattern and is another mechanism for reentrant tachycardia not previously documented in children.     

Quintuple pathways participating in three distinct types of atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia in a patient with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

Electrophysiologic studies were performed in a patient with recurrent supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Sinus and paced atrial beats had QRS complexes characteristic of atrioventricular (A-V) conduction through a manifest left lateral accessory pathway (Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, type A). Three distinct types of A-V reciprocating tachycardia and three different modes of retrograde atrial activation were demonstrated. Type 1 tachycardia involved the slow A-V nodal pathway and a second (left lateral or left paraseptal) accessory A-V pathway capable of retrograde conduction only. Type 2 tachycardia was of the slow-fast A-V nodal pathway type. Type 3 tachycardia involved a heretofore undescribed circuit in that retrograde conduction occurred through an accessory A-V pathway with long retrograde conduction times and anterograde conduction through both the manifest left lateral accessory A-V pathway and fast A-V nodal pathway. Premature ventricular beats delivered late in the cycle of this tachycardia advanced (but did not change) the retrograde atrial activity without affecting the timing of the corresponding anterograde H deflection. In summary, this patient had five (three accessory and two intranodal) pathways participating in three different types of A-V reciprocating tachycardia; the recurrence of these were prevented with oral amiodarone therapy.     

Simultaneous anterograde fast-slow atrioventricular nodal pathway conduction after procainamide

Three patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia underwent electrophysiologic studies that included His bundle recordings, incremental atrial and ventricular pacing and extrastimulation before and after intravenous infusion of 500 mg of procainamide. In all three patients the tachycardia was induced during atrial pacing or premature atrial stimulation, or both. Two of the three patients had discontinuous atrioventricular (A-V) nodal curves with induction of a slow-fast tachycardia during failure in anterograde fast pathway conduction and one patient had a smooth A-V nodal curve with induction of a slow-fast tachycardia at critical A-H interval delays. After procainamide: (1) in all three patients atrial pacing induced A-V nodal Wenckebach periodicity (cycle length 300 to 400 ms) resulting in simultaneous anterograde fast and slow pathway conduction (one atrial beat resulting in two QRS complexes) and retrograde fast pathway conduction initiating an echo response or a slow-fast tachycardia, or both; (2) in all three patients there was enhanced conduction and shortening of refractoriness of the anterograde fast pathway and depressed conduction and lengthening of refractoriness of the retrograde fast pathway; and (3) in two patients there was inability to sustain tachycardia because of selective block within the retrograde fast pathway. In conclusion: (1) procainamide altered conduction and refractoriness of the anterograde fast and slow pathways so that simultaneous conduction could occur during atrial pacing, resulting in a double ventricular response and a slow-fast echo or tachycardia, or both; and (2) the differential effects of procainamide on anterograde fast and retrograde fast pathways suggests two functional A-V nodal fast pathways, one for anterograde and the other for retrograde conduction.     

Electrophysiologic evidence for selective retrograde utilization of a specialized conducting system in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

In 12 patients with atrioventricular (A-V) nodal reentrant tachycardia, the existence and utilization of retrograde ventriculoatrial bypass tracts in the reentrant process were excluded, and the characteristics of the anterograde and retrograde limbs of the reentrant circuits were studied using His bundle electrograms, incremental atrial and ventricular pacing and atrial and ventricular extrastimulus techniques before and after the administration of 0.01 mg/kg of intravenous ouabain. Similar studies were also performed in five control patients without tachycardia. Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia could be induced in all 12 patients during atrial pacing-induced A-V nodal Wenckebach periods or premature atrial stimulation, or both. On the basis of conduction time in the retrograde limb during tachycardia and during retrograde studies, two groups were identified. Group I (seven patients) had (1) short (39 ± 10 msec) and constant conduction time in the retrogarde limb measured from the anterograde His bundle deflection to the retrograde atrial echo response (H-Ae interval), (2) no change in ventriculoatrial conduction time up to maximal ventricular pacing rates, (3) H₂-A₂ intervals during retrograde refractory period studies that were identical to the H-Ae intervals and that did not increase with decreasing V₁-V₂ intervals, and (4) increased conduction time of the anterograde limb (Ae-H intervals) after the administration of ouabain without any effect on retrograde limb conduction (H-Ae and H₂-A₂ intervals) and refractoriness. Group II (five patients) had (1) long and variable H-Ae intervals (60 to 180 msec), (2) a progressive increase in ventriculoatrial intervals during incremental ventricular pacing, (3) an increase in H₂-A₂ intervals in response to decreasing V₁-V₂ intervals, and (4) increased anterograde (Ae-H interval) and retrograde limb (H-Ae and H₂-A₂ intervals) conduction and refractoriness after the administration of ouabain. Changes in the H₂-A₂ interval corresponded to the changes in four of the five control patients. These findings suggest that (1) in group I the anterograde limb was the A-V node, whereas the retrograde limb was an A-V nodal bypass tract or an insulated intranodal tract physiologically unlike the A-V node; and (2) in group II the A-V node comprised both the anterograde and retrograde limbs of the reentrant circuit.     

Demonstration of multiple antegrade and retrograde atrioventricular pathways

A patient with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia had discontinuous antegrade (A₁-A₂, H₁-H₂) and retrograde (V₁-V₂, A₁-A₂) conduction curves suggesting dual A-V nodal pathways in both directions. Atrial echoes occurred with premature atrial pacing only at short A₁-A₂ coupling intervals after long antegrade (A₂-H₂) and retrograde (H₂-A_e) conduction intervals. Premature ventricular stimulation revealed ventricular echoes simultaneously with a sudden increase in the V₂-A₂ interval. The echo zone coincided with the slow pathway curve. Following atropine the echo zone was extended over the slow and fast pathway curves. Slow pathway conduction was observed at long and short V₁-V₂ coupling intervals, fast pathway conduction at intermediate V₁-V₂ coupling intervals. Following isoproterenol premature ventricular stimulation initiated two cycles of ventricular echoes with relatively long retrograde (V₂-A₂, V_e-A_e) and short antegrade (A₂-H_e, A_c-H_e) conduction times, the earliest atrial activation being observed in the low right atrium before the left atrium and the high right atrium. Antegrade fast and slow pathway as well as retrograde fast pathway conduction appeared to be confined to the A-V node. Retrograde slow pathway conduction may progress through a slow or fast A-V nodal pathway slowed by antegrade concealed conduction. However, an accessory pathway with long conduction times located near the septum cannot be ruled out entirely.     

Retrograde block during dual pathway atrioventricular nodal reentrant paroxysmal tachycardia

There are limited reported data regarding the occurrence of retrograde block during dual pathway atrioventricular (A-V) nodal reentrant paroxysmal tachycardia. This study describes two patients with this phenomenon. The first patient had 2:1 and type 1 retrograde ventriculoatrial block during the common variety of A-V nodal reentrance (slow pathway for anterograde and fast pathway for retrograde conduction). Fractionated atrial electrograms suggested that the site of block was within the atria. The second patient had type 1 retrograde block (between the A-V node and the low septal right atrium) during the unusual variety of A-V nodal reentrance (stow pathway for retrograde and fast pathway for anterograde conduction). The abolition of retrograde block by atropine suggested that the site of block was within A-V nodal tissue. Both cases demonstrate that intact retrograde conduction is not necessary for the continuation of A-V nodal reentrant paroxysymal tachycardia. Case 2 supports the hypothesis that the atria are not a requisite part of the A-V nodal reentrant pathway.     

Retrograde dual atrioventricular nodal pathways

Thirty-one (3.5 percent) of 887 studied patients had retrograde dual atrioventricular (A-V) nodal pathways, as manifested by discontinuous retrograde A-V nodal conduction curves (29 patients) or by two sets of ventriculoatrial (V-A) conduction intervals at the same paced cycle length (2 patients). All patients had A-V nodal reentrant ventricular echoes of the unusual variety induced with ventricular stimulation (25 patients had single, 2 patients had double and 4 patients had more than three ventricular echoes). The weak link of the reentrant circuit was always the retrograde slow pathway. Eleven of the 31 patients also had anterograde dual A-V nodal pathways (bidirectional dual pathways). Eight patients (26 percent) had spontaneous as well as inducible A-V nodal reentrant paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (of the unusual type in three and the usual type in five). In addition, three patients (10 percent) had only inducible supraventricular tachycardia (two of the unusual and one of the usual type).Retrograde dual A-V nodal pathways are uncommon. They are associated with the finding of at least single A-V nodal reentrant ventricular echoes (all patients), anterograde dual pathways (one third of patients) and A-V nodal reentrant paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia of the usual or unusual variety (one third of patients).     

下位法射频消融慢径路改良房室结治疗室上性心动过速23例

用下位法射频消融慢径路改良房室结治疗房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)18例,房室折返性心动过速(AVRT)5例.AVNRT中16例为慢—快型,1例快—慢型,1例慢—快型与快—慢型并存,18例慢径路全部阻断成功.AVRT中1例显性预激,4例隐性预激,有5例慢径路和3例房室旁路消融成功.射频放电时21例出现结性心律.无严重并发症出现.AVNRT病人中随仿1—15个月有1例复发,第二次射频成功.认为下位法射频消融阻断慢径路成功率高,并发症少.     

Initiation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in patients with discontinuous anterograde atrioventricular nodal conduction curves with and without documented supraventricular tachycardia: Observations on the role of a discontinuous retrograde conduction curve

To evaluate factors playing a role in initiation of atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia utilizing anterogradely a slow and retrogradely a fast conducting AV nodal pathway, 38 patients having no accessory pathways and showing discontinuous anterograde AV nodal conduction curves during atrial stimulation were studied. Twenty-two patients (group A) underwent an electrophysiologic investigation because of recurrent paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) that had been electrocardiographically documented before the study. Sixteen patients (group B) underwent the study because of a history of palpitations (15 patients) or recurrent ventricular tachycardia (one patient); in none of them had SVT ever been electrocardiographically documented before the investigation. Twenty-one of the 22 patients of group A demonstrated continuous retrograde conduction curves during ventricular stimulation. In 20 tachycardia was initiated by either a single atrial premature beat (18 patients) or by two atrial premature beats. Fifteen of the 16 patients of group B had discontinuous retrograde conduction curves during ventricular stimulation, with a long refractory period of their retrograde fast pathway. Tachycardia was initiated by multiple atrial premature beats in one patient. Thirteen out of the remaining 15 patients received atropine. Thereafter tachycardia could be initiated in three patients by a single atrial premature beat, by two atrial premature beats in one patient, and by incremental atrial pacing in another patient. In the remaining eight patients tachycardia could not be initiated. Our observations indicate that the pattern of ventriculoatrial conduction found during ventricular stimulation is a marker for ease of initiation of AV nodal tachycardia in patients with discontinuous anterograde AV nodal conduction curves.     

Analysis of anterograde and retrograde fast pathway properties in patients with dual atrioventricular nodal pathways: Observations regarding the pathophysiology of the Lown-Ganong-Levine syndrome

Anterograde and retrograde fast pathway properties were analyzed in 160 patients with anterograde dual atrioventricular (A-V) nodal pathways, with or without A-V nodal reentrant tachycardia. A-H intervals (reflecting anterograde fast pathway conduction) ranged from 46 to 234 ms (mean ± standard deviation 91 ± 30). The longest atrial paced cycle lengths at which block occurred in the anterograde fast pathway ranged from 231 to 857 ms (435 ± 112). Regression analysis of these cycle lengths versus A-H intervals revealed a correlation coefficient (r) value of 0.41 (p < 0.01). Retrograde fast pathway conduction was present (at a ventricular paced cycle length slightly shorter than sinus rhythm) in 84 of 125 patients: 15 of 16 with an A-H interval of less than 60 ms, 44 of 58 with an interval of 60 to 90 ms, 20 of 41 with an interval of 91 to 130 ms and 5 of 10 with an A-H Interval of more than 130 ms (p < 0.01). Retrograde fast pathway conduction was intact at a cycle length of 375 ms in 41 of 124 patients: 11 of 16 with an A-H interval of less than 60 ms, 22 of 57 with an interval of 60 to 90 ms, 7 of 41 with an interval of 91 to 130 ms and 1 of 10 with an A-H interval of more than 130 ms (p <0.01). Sustained A-V nodal reentrant tachycardia could be induced in 51 of 160 patients, being induced in 7 of 17 with an A-H interval of less than 60 ms, 27 of 72 with an interval of 60 to 90 ms, 15 of 59 with an interval of 91 to 130 and 2 of 10 with an interval greater than 130 ms (p < 0.05).In conclusion, in patients with dual A-V nodal pathways, there are relations between the A-H interval and the ability of the fast pathway to sustain sequential anterograde conduction, and between the A-H interval and the ability of the fast pathway to sustain sequential retrograde conduction. Among patients with dual pathways, patients with a shorter A-H interval are more likely to have A-V nodal reentrant tachycardia, because these patients are more likely to have excellent retrograde fast pathway sequential conduction (a requirement for the occurrence of reentrant tachycardia).     

Atypical forms of supraventricular tachycardia due to atrioventricular node reentry in children after radiofrequency modification of slow pathway conduction

Objectives. This study was performed to investigate the prevalence, mechanisms and clinical significance of supraventricular tachycardias inducible in children or adolescents after radiofrequency modification of slow pathway conduction for the treatment of atrioventricular (AV) node reentrant tachycardia.Background. Limited data have been reported with regard to the physiology of AV node reentrant tachycardia in young patients. Radiofrequency catheter ablation allows evaluation of the effects of selective modification of the different pathways involved in AV node reentrant tachycardia.Methods. Selective modification of slow pathway conduction was performed in 18 young patients (12.9 ± 3.4 years old) with typical (anterograde slow-retrograde fast) AV node reentrant tachycardia. Radiofrequency energy was applied across the posteromedial or midseptal tricuspid annulus, guided by slow pathway potentials and anatomic position. Programmed stimulation was performed after modification of slow pathway conduction defined as noninducibility of typical AV node reentrant tachycardia.Results. Modification of slow pathway conduction was achieved in each patient, with a median of four applications of radiofrequency energy. However, atypical forms of supraventricular tachycardia were inducible in 9 of 18 young patients after slow pathway modification: AV node reentrant tachycardia with 2 to 1 AV block (seven patients; anterograde fast-retrograde slow AV node reentrant tachycardia (five patients); and sustained accelerated junctional tachycardia (two patients). In comparison, atypical forms of tachycardia were inducible in only 2 of 59 adult patients with AV node reentrant tachycardia undergoing slow pathway modification in the same laboratory (p = 0.01). Additional applications of radiofrequency energy to the posteromedial tricuspid annulus rendered AV node reentrant tachycardia with 2 to 1 block and the fast-slow form of AV node reentrant tachycardia noninducible. Junctional tachycardia terminated spontaneously in both patients. During 9.8 ± 3 months of follow-up, slow-fast AV node reentrant tachycardia has recurred in one patient, whereas fast-slow AV node reentrant tachycardia has occurred in two patients, both with inducible fast-slow tachycardia after the initial modification of slow pathway conduction.Conclusions. Initial applications of radiofrequency energy may selectively modify the anterograde conduction of slow pathway fibers in young patients with AV node reentrant tachycardia. This may result in AV node reentrant tachycardia with 2 to 1 AV block or a reversal of the reentrant circuit (fast-slow tachycardia). Induction of these tachyarrhythmias indicates that further applications of radiofrequency energy are required for the successful modification of slow pathway conduction in young patients. The increased prevalence of inducible atypical arrhythmias among young patients suggests differences in the anatomic or electrophysiologic substrate of AV node reentrant tachycardia that may evolve as a function of age.     

Incidence, determinants and significance of fixed retrograde conduction in the region of the atrioventricular node. Evidence for retrograde atrioventricular nodal bypass tracts.

Of 104 consecutive patients studied in our laboratory with His bundle electrograms, atrial and ventricular pacing and the atrial and ventricular extrastimulus techniques, 18 patients in whom the existence and utilization of ventriculoatrial (V-A) bypass tracts were excluded demonstrated evidence for fixed and rapid retrograde conduction in the region of the atrioventricular node (A-V) as suggested by the following: (1) short (36 +/- 2 msec [mean +/- standard error of mean]) and constant retrograde H2-A2 intervals during retrograde refractory period studies; (2) significantly (P less than 0.025) better V-A than A-V conduction; (3) significantly (P less than 0.025) shorter retrograde functional refractory period of the V-A conducting system than of the A-V conduction system; and (4) the retrograde effective refractory period of the A=V nodal region was not attainable in any of the 18 patients. Fourteen of the 18 patients (77 percent) had a history of palpitations and 10 (51 percent) had documented paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia; in 13 (72 percent) single echoes or sustained reentrant supraventricular tachycardia, or both, could be induced during atrial pacing or atrial premature stimulation studies, or both. During tachycardia all these 13 patients had a short (37 +/- 2.4 msec) and constant conduction time in the retrograde limb (H-Ae interval) of the reentrant circuit that was identical to the H2-A2 interval. In conclusion, fixed and rapid retrograde conduction in the region of the A-V node (1) is seen in approximately 17 percent of patients, (2) is associated with a large incidence of reentrant paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, and (3) suggests the presence of A-V nodal bypass tracts (intranodal or extranodal functioning in retrograde manner).     

Determinants of tachycardia induction using ventricular stimulation in dual pathway atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Factors determining tachycardia induction using ventricular stimulation in atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia utilizing the slow pathway for anterograde and the fast pathway for retrograde conduction were analyzed in 53 patients. Sixteen patients had tachycardia induced by ventricular stimulation. In 15, tachycardia was inducible with incremental ventricular pacing. In 4 of these 15 patients, the tachycardia was also induced with V1V2 testing, while in 11 patients, the tachycardia was not induced with V1V2 testing. In 9 of the latter 11 patients, tachycardia could be induced with V1V2V3 testing, suggesting that the retrograde effective refractory period (ERP) of the right bundle (RB) or the relative refractory period of the His-Purkinje system (HPS) was the limiting factor for tachycardia induction during V1V2 testing. In the remaining one patient, tachycardia was induced with V1V2V3 testing, which provoked a premature ventricular beat, leading to tachycardia induction. Tachycardia was not induced by ventricular stimulation in 37 patients. Factors deterring tachycardia induction in these patients may be related to the retrograde ERP or functional refractory period (FRP) of the HPS, the retrograde ERP of the fast pathway, and an insufficient conduction delay of the circuit (retrograde fast and anterograde slow pathway) to allow anterograde conduction of the slow pathway. In conclusion, AV nodal reentrant tachycardia can be induced by ventricular stimulation in approximately 30% of patients with incremental ventricular pacing and/or ventricular extrastimulus testing. Induction of tachycardia with ventricular stimulation, nevertheless, is frequently limited by the retrograde FRP or ERP of the HPS, the retrograde ERP of the fast pathway, and possibly by an insufficient conduction delay of the circuit.     

房室结双径路传导的心电图表现

目的探讨房室结双径路传导引起的心电图表现及形成机制。方法回顾性分析19例患者的常规心电图及动态心电图中出现的房室结双径路传导现象。结果观察到6种房室结双径路传导现象：①房性期前收缩或心房颤动诱发慢快型AVNRT,②AVNRT伴2：1房室传导阻滞或功能性束支传导阻滞时不影响心动过速周长,③室性期前收缩诱发慢快型及快慢型AVNRT,④房性期前收缩重整慢快型AVNRT,⑤两条房室结慢径路交替顺传引起的慢快型AVNRT,⑥房室结双径路同步不等速传导引起的1：2房室传导及折返。结论认识这些心电图现象并了解其形成机制,有助于体表心电图诊断房室结双径路传导。     

Differential Effect of Adenosine on Anterograde and Retrograde Fast Pathway Conduction in Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Adenosine and Retrograde Fast Pathway Conduction . Introduction : Several studies have shown that the fast pathway is more responsive to adenosine than the slow pathway in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Little information is available regarding the effect of adenosine on anterograde and retrograde fast pathway conduction.
Methods and Results : The effects of adenosine on anterograde and retrograde fast pathway conduction were evaluated in 116 patients (mean age 47 ± 16 years) with typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Each patient received 12 mg of adenosine during ventricular pacing at a cycle length 20 msec longer than the fast pathway VA block cycle length and during sinus rhythm or atrial pacing at 20 msec longer than the fast pathway AV block cycle length. Anterograde block occurred in 98% of patients compared with retrograde fast pathway block in 62% of patients ( P < 0.001). Unresponsiveness of the retrograde fast pathway to adenosine was associated with a shorter AV block cycle length (374 ± 78 vs 333 ± 74 msec, P < 0.01), a shorter VA block cycle length (383 ± 121 vs 307 ± 49 msec, P < 0.001), and a shorter VA interval during tachycardia (53 ± 23 vs 41 ± 17 msec, P < 0.01).
Conclusion : Although anterograde fast pathway conduction is almost always blocked by 12 mg of adenosine, retrograde fast pathway conduction is not blocked by adenosine in 38% of patients with typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. This indicates that the anterograde and retrograde fast pathways may be anatomically and/or functionally distinct. Unresponsiveness of VA conduction to adenosine is not a reliable indicator of an accessory pathway.     

Atrioventricular nodal tachycardia with and without discontinuous anterograde atrioventricular nodal conduction curves: a reappraisal of the dual pathway concept

To illustrate the complexity of the electrophysiological behaviourof the human alrioventricular (A–V) node, two patientssuffering from A–V nodal tachycardia are described. Duringtachycardia an A–V nodal slow pathway was used for anterogradeconduction, and an A–V nodal fast pathway for retrogradeconduction. Patient 1 showed smooth A–V nodal conductioncurves in both the anterograde and the retrograde direction.Tachycardia could only be initiated by ventricular prematurebeats. No critical delay in ventriculo-atrial conduction timewas required for initiation of tachycardia. Patient 2 showedsmooth A–V nodal conduction curves at the lowest rateof pacing during atrial and ventricular stimulation. The curvesbecame discontinuous in both directions when the basic drivencyclelength was decreased. Tachycardia could only be initiated byatrial premature beats. Ventricular premature beats inducednon-sustained A–V nodal reentry that used an A–Vnodal fast pathway for anterograde conduction, and an A–Vnodal slow pathway for retrograde conduction. Accepting dualpathways in the anterograde and retrograde directions in theA–V node, means that depending upon their electrophysiologicalproperties a large number of combinations of anterograde andretrograde conduction are possible. When more than two A–Vnodal pathways are present, the number of possible combinationswill increase markedly. These considerations are of help inunderstanding electrophysiological findings in patients withA–V nodal tachycardia. They are also useful to explainthe importance of autonomic tone and the results of drug administrationin these patients.     

Multiple reentrant tachycardias due to retrograde conduction of dual atrioventricular bundles with atrioventricular nodal-like properties.

A patient is presented who had two paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias, one slow and incessant and the other fast. Both paroxysmal tachycardias appeared to be atrioventricular (A-V) reentrant, with anterograde conduction by way of a normal A-V pathway. Two pathways conducting in retrograde manner were demonstrated, characterized by different conduction times (fast and slow), identical abnormal atrial activation sequence and A-V nodal-like properties (retrograde Wenckebach periodicity with rapid ventricular pacing, and depression with ouabain and propranolol). Thus, there appeared to be two anomalous A-V bundles with nodal-like properties conducting in retrograde fashion. Whether the paroxysmal tachycardia was fast or slow depended on which of these pathways was utilized. Spontaneous cure of incessant paroxysmal tachycardia was observed and coincided with unexplained total loss of ability for ventriculoatrial conduction.     

Effects of four antiarrhythmic drugs on the induction and termination of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia

The electrophysiological effects of antiarrhythmic drugs were tested in 36 patients with recurrent paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT), 25 of whom had accessory pathway reentrant tachycardia (APRT) and 11 A-V nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT; 10 of the slow-fast type one of the fast-slow type). The test drugs were procainamide (used in 19 patients), verapamil (in 27), disopyramide (in 31), and propranolol (in 15). The drugs were tested for their ability to terminate episodes of PSVT as well as to inhibit their induction. Procainamide had an inhibitory effect on APRT in nine of 12 patients (75%) and terminated episodes of APRT in seven of 11 patients (63.6%); in all of them V-A block was responsible for the termination. In four of six patients (66.7%) with slow-fast AVNRT and in one patient with fast-slow AVNRT, inhibition of the induction of tachycardia attacks was noted after procainamide. Termination of AVNRT was seen in the same number of patients. Verapamil inhibited the induction of APRT in 12 of 18 patients (66.7%) and terminated episodes of APRT in 10 of 16 patients (62.5%), all by A-V block. In six of eight patients (75%) with slow-fast AVNRT, inhibition of the induction as well as termination of tachycardia were noted after verapamil. Disopyramide had an inhibitory effect on APRT in seven of 23 patients (30.4%) and terminated APRT in five of 21 patients (23.8%) by V-A block, while AVNRT (all slow-fast type) was terminated in only one of eight patients (12.5%) by disopyramide. Disopyramide was less effective than previously reported. This could be attributed to a relatively low dosage and slow infusion speed. Propranolol inhibited the induction of APRT and terminated episodes of APRT in only one of 10 patients (10%). In two of four patients (50%) with slow-fast AVNRT, an inhibitory effect by propranolol was noted, but termination was seen in only one patients.     

Multiple Atrioventricular Nodal Pathways in Humans:

Multiple AV Nodal Pathways. Introduction : Multiple AV nodal pathway physiology can be demonstrated in certain patients with clinical AV reentrant tachycardia.
Methods and Results : Evidence suggesting multiple AV nodal pathway conduction was present in seven (two males; age range 15 to 75 years) of 78 patients (9%) who underwent electrophysiologic studies for AV nodal tachycardia. The presence of two discrete discontinuities in the AV nodal conduction curves suggested triple AV nodal pathway conduction. Detailed mapping of their retrograde atrial activation sequence was performed along the tricuspid annulus from the coronary sinus ostium to the His-bundle electrogram recording site. Three zones (anterior, middle, and posterior) correspond to the upper, middle, and lower third of the triangle of Koch, respectively. The fast pathway exits were determined as anterior (4/7) or middle (3/7), the intermediate pathway exits as middle (4/7) or posterior (3/7), and the slow pathway exits as middle (1/7) or posterior (6/7). Other evidence suggesting multiple AV nodal pathway conduction includes: (1) triple ventricular depolarizations from a single atrial impulse; (2) sequential dual ventricular echoes; (3) spontaneous transformation between the slow-fast and fast-slow forms of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia; and (4) persistent cycle length alternans during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. In four patients, all three pathways were shown to be involved in AV nodal echoes or reentrant tachycardia.
Conclusion : Multiple AV nodal pathways are not uncommon and can be identified by careful electrophysiologic elucidation and mapping technique.     

Simultaneous antegrade dual AV node conduction initiates AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia (a rare initiation mechanism)

Typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia among adults. The concept of dual pathway physiology remains widely accepted, although this physiology likely results from the functional properties of anisotropic tissue within the triangle of Koch, rather than anatomically distinct tracts of conduction. AVNRT is typically induced with anterograde block over the fast pathway and conduction over the slow pathway, with subsequent retrograde conduction over the fast pathway. On rare occasions, anterograde AV node conduction occurs simultaneously through fast and slow pathways resulting in two ventricular beats in response to one atrial beat. We report a case of AVNRT where the tachycardia is always induced by the same mechanism described above. Successful ablation was achieved by slow pathway modification.