Thrust joint manipulation utilization by U.S. physical therapists*

Study Design: Online survey study.

Objective: To determine physical therapists’ utilization of thrust joint manipulation (TJM) and their comfort level in using TJM between the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions of the spine. We hypothesized that physical therapists who use TJM would report regular use and comfort providing it to the thoracic and lumbar spines, but not so much for the cervical spine.

Background: Recent surveys of first professional physical therapy degree programs have found that TJM to the cervical spine is not taught to the same degree as to the thoracic and lumbar spines.

Methods: We developed a survey to capture the required information and had a Delphi panel of 15 expert orthopedic physical therapists review it and provide constructive feedback. A revised version of the survey was sent to the same Delphi panel and consensus was obtained on the final survey instrument. The revised survey was made available to any licensed physical therapists in the U.S.A. using an online survey system, from October 2014 through June 2015.

Results: Of 1014 responses collected, 1000 completed surveys were included for analysis. There were 478 (48%) males; the mean age of respondents was 39.7 ± 10.81 years (range 24–92); and mean years of clinical experience was 13.6 ± 10.62. A majority of respondents felt that TJM was safe and effective when applied to lumbar (90.5%) and thoracic (91.1%) spines; however, a smaller percentage (68.9%) felt that about the cervical spine. More therapists reported they would perform additional screening prior to providing TJM to the cervical spine than they would for the lumbar and thoracic spines. Therapists agreed they were less likely to provide and feel comfortable with TJM in the cervical spine compared to the thoracic and lumbar spines. Finally, therapists who are male; practice in orthopedic spine setting; are aware of manipulation clinical prediction rules; and have manual therapy certification, are more likely to use TJM and be comfortable with it in all three regions.

Conclusion: Results indicate that respondents do not believe TJM for the cervical spine to be as safe and efficacious as that for the lumbar and thoracic spines. Further, they are more likely to perform additional screening, abstain from and do not feel comfortable performing TJM for the cervical spine.

Clinical Relevance: Our research reveals there is a discrepancy between utilization of TJM at different spinal levels. This research provides an opportunity to address variability in clinical practice among physical therapists utilizing TJM.     

Factors influencing physical therapists’ clinical reasoning: qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis

Background: The capacity of physical therapists to reason effectively in patient management is essential to maximizing outcomes. Although conceptual frameworks of clinical reasoning exist, their theoretical foundations are insufficiently validated to establish those factors that are paramount in guiding physical therapists’ clinical reasoning. Studies on how physical therapists clinically reason constitute important means of identifying constructs of such reasoning.

Objective: This systematic review aimed to synthesize and interpret the findings of qualitative studies designed to examine factors that are inherent in physical therapists’ clinical reasoning with respect to their knowledge, experiences, and practices.

Methods: Searches of studies were carried out in four databases, gray literature, and reference lists. Two reviewers independently assessed methodological quality of the studies using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) and performed the analysis: extraction and comparative appraisal of findings, identification of themes, reciprocal translation synthesis, and identification of categories and subcategories.

Results: Ten studies were included. Four themes of factors influencing physical therapists’ clinical reasoning emerged, namely, Physical therapist as a source, Patient as a source, Elements of the reasoning process, and Context.

Conclusions: The identified themes validated some constructs underlying existing clinical reasoning frameworks. Most influencing factors were related to the physical therapist, which highlights opportunities to improve effective reasoning at this level. The notion that this process is recurrent, multifaceted, and contextual lends itself to changing in accordance with the needs of the patient, consistent with a biopsychosocial perspective. How clinicians weigh biomedical and psychosocial elements in their reasoning however warrants further study.     

Mindfulness in Physical and Occupational Therapy Education and Practice: A scoping review

Background: Mindfulness practices provide numerous benefits for individuals with a variety of health issues. Recent research has highlighted the benefits of mindfulness for health professionals. The potential benefits for physical and occupational therapists or students however, are currently unclear.

Objectives: To perform a scoping review on the effects of mindfulness practices among physical (PT) and occupational therapists (OT) and students of those disciplines.

Methods: Eligible published articles in English were identified through a literature search of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and AMED from the inception of databases to November 2015. Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles were screened for the selection of relevant papers. Articles identified as editorials, correspondences, commentaries, case reports, abstracts alone, and review papers were excluded.

Results: Six studies (two qualitative studies, one quantitative study, one mixed-method study, and two experimental studies) met the inclusion criteria. Three studies focused on PT/OT students, two on clinicians and one on current clinicians who had previously failed a course. These studies highlighted the potential benefits of mindfulness for physical and occupational therapists. They should be interpreted with caution however, due to the small number of relevant studies, high heterogeneity in mindfulness interventions and methodological limitations.

Conclusions: There is a paucity of research on the effects of mindfulness among physical and occupational therapists and students of those disciplines. The lack of relevant studies makes a systematic review challenging but the findings of the current studies suggest potentially promising effects.     

Provider reliability with interventions for knee impairments: a preliminary investigation to facilitate development of an MDT-based knee intervention taxonomy

Objectives: The lack of a standardized intervention taxonomy in comparative effectiveness research trials has led to uncertainty regarding the management of individuals with knee impairments. Inconsistently and poorly defined interventions affect frontline–care providers’ abilities to understand and assimilate research findings into practice. An intervention taxonomy could help overcome the lack of treatment specificity commonly found in research trials.

Methods: In the present study, we aimed to develop a Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT)–based taxonomy and test the levels of reliability between providers who currently manage individuals with knee impairments in a rehabilitation setting. A total of 182 participants accessed the study during the study period, in which 180 consented to participate and 59 completed the survey (98.9% participation rate; 32.7% completion rate).

Results: A total of 89.8% of the participants who completed the survey were physical therapists. Fleiss kappa values for the primary, secondary, and tertiary categories were 0.90, 0.89, and 0.71, respectively. The results of our investigation suggest substantial to almost perfect levels of reliability for identifying diverse MDT-based knee interventions displayed in video and vignette format within a sample population primarily of physical therapists who currently manage individuals with knee impairments in a rehabilitation setting.

Discussion: Our findings show acceptable levels of reliability and provide support for using this standardized MDT-based intervention taxonomy as a way to improve intervention specificity and generalizability in comparative effectiveness research.

Level of Evidence: 5     

Maximizing gait and balance: behaviors and decision-making processes of persons with multiple sclerosis and physical therapists

Purpose: To describe the behavioral decisions used by persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) and physical therapists to maximize gait and balance following outpatient physical therapy.

Methods: A multi-method case series with seven matched pairs (persons with MS–physical therapists). Quota sampling maximized variability among persons with MS (disease steps score range 3–6). Three of the four physical therapists were MS or neurology certified. Persons with MS completed a phone survey, follow-up interview, and standardized questionnaires. Physical therapists completed an interview. Data were collected 2–8 weeks following discharge. Content and constant comparison analyses were used for thematic development and triangulation.

Results: Core themes arose exemplifying the decision-making processes and actions of persons with MS (challenging self by pushing but respecting limits) and physical therapists (finding the right fit). One overarching theme, keeping their lived world large, or participation in valued life roles, emerged integrating both perspectives driving decision-making.

Conclusions: Participants have a shared goal of maximizing gait and balance so persons with MS can participate in valued life roles. Understanding the differences in the behavioral decisions and optimizing skill sets in shared decision-making and self-management may enhance the therapeutic partnership and engagement in gait- and balance-enhancing behaviors.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• Persons with MS and physical therapists have a shared goal of maximizing gait and balance so persons with MS can participate in valued activities and life roles, or more poetically, keep their lived world large.

• Knowledge that persons with MS aim to challenge themselves by pushing but respecting limits can provide physical therapists with greater insight in helping persons with MS resolve uncertainty, set meaningful goals, and build the routines and resilience needed for engagement in gait- and balance-enhancing behaviors.

• Enriching skill sets in shared decision-making, behavior change and self-management may optimize the physical therapist toolbox.

     

Translational manipulation under anesthesia for patients with frozen shoulder: a case series study with five-year health care utilization and post-manipulative arthroscopic findings

Study Design: Case series study.

Objectives: Although there have been no reported complications from translational manipulation under anesthesia (tMUA) for individuals with adhesive capsulitis (AC) there are no cases reporting surgical findings post tMUA. Also, there are no studies evaluating health care utilization following tMUA. The purpose of this study was to: (1) report clinical outcomes following tMUA, (2) describe relevant health care costs and utilization following tMUA, and (3) summarize findings from two cases receiving joint arthroscopy following tMUA.

Methods: Fourteen Individuals with AC underwent tMUA. Range of motion (ROM) and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) values were collected at baseline and six weeks follow-up. Shoulder-related health care cost and utilization were analyzed for a five-year period following tMUA. Two additional patients with AC underwent tMUA followed by arthroscopic assessment for evidence of iatrogenic injury.

Results: Thirteen patients completed the six-week follow-up. Mean change scores for ROM and SPADI values were flexion; +38.5°, abduction; +71.1°, external rotation (shoulder abducted); +49.8°, internal rotation (shoulder abducted); +26.6°, SPADI scores; +44.4. 13 patient records were analyzed for health care utilization. Ten of the 13 patients utilized no additional shoulder-related health care. Surgical evaluation revealed no evidence of iatrogenic injury.

Discussion: Clinical outcomes were similar to previous studies. Utilization data indicated that for the majority of patients, little shoulder-related health care was utilized. Surgical evaluation provided further evidence that tMUA performed by a physical therapist is safe. Future research will be required to establish a causal relationship between tMUA and the results observed in this study.

Level of Evidence: Therapy, Level 4.     

Manual physical therapy combined with high-intensity functional rehabilitation for severe lower extremity musculoskeletal injuries: a case series

Objectives: Severe lower extremity trauma accounts for large healthcare costs and often results in elective amputation and poor long-term outcomes. The purpose of this case series is to describe an orthopedic manual physical therapy (OMPT) approach combined with a return to run (RTR) clinical pathway consisting of high-intensity functional rehabilitation with a custom energy-storing orthosis.

Methods: Three consecutive male patients, aged 21–23 years, with severe lower extremity musculoskeletal injuries were treated with a combined intervention that included a mean (SD) of 12 (2·1) OMPT sessions and 24 (8·7) functional rehabilitation sessions over a mean of 6 weeks (1·0). Additional training with a custom energy-storing orthosis consisted of a mean of 15 (1·2) additional sessions over 4 weeks. Patient self-report outcome measures and a variety of physical performance tests captured change in function.

Results: Baseline lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) and foot and ankle ability measure activities of daily living subscale (FAAM-ADL) scores indicated severe disability. All patients exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in at least one self-report outcome or physical performance test without a brace. Two of three patients exceeded the MCID for at least two physical performance tests after training with and utilizing a custom energy-storing orthosis.

Discussion: Clinically meaningful changes in self-reported function or physical performance were observed in all patients. A multi-modal approach, including manual therapy and functional exercise, may address the entire spectrum of impairments in patients with severe lower extremity trauma, resulting in improvements in both braced and un-braced function.     

Content and bibliometric analyses of the Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy

Background:

Article characteristics and trends have been elucidated for other physical therapy-focused journals using content and bibliometric analysis. These findings are important for assessing the current state of a journal and for guiding future publication of research. To date, these analyses have not been performed for the Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy (JMMT).

Objective:

To describe content and trends for articles published in JMMT over a 20-year period (1993–2012).

Methods:

Journal articles were coded using previously-established domains (article type, participant type, research design, study purpose, and clinical condition). Total publications and proportion of publications based on domain were described. Articles specific to manual therapy intervention were examined and compared to data from other physical therapy-focused journals. Impact by citation and author was examined using bibliometric software.

Results:

Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy was found to have a recent acceleration in the number of articles published annually. Over time, topical reviews have decreased in favor of research reports. However, rigorous study designs have represented only a small portion of total journal content, and case reports have maintained a consistent publication presence. Manual therapy intervention articles in JMMT are predominantly case designs, however are similar in characteristics to manual therapy intervention articles published in other physical therapy-focused journals. For JMMT articles overall and manual therapy intervention articles across journals, young to middle-aged symptomatic adults with low back and/or neck pain were the most common study participants.

Discussion:

Increases in the number of papers and a move toward research reports were observed in JMMT over the 20-year period. Considerations for the future were outlined, including the publication of articles with more rigorous research designs. Manual therapy research for adolescents and older adults and for upper and lower extremity conditions should also be considered as priorities for the future.     

Prevalence and reliability of treatment-based classification for subgrouping patients with low back pain

Objectives: To observe the distribution of patients who presented with low back pain (LBP) and to determine the between therapists’ interrater reliability of assessments in a private outpatient setting using treatment-based classification (TBC) subgroups.

Methods: An observational and methodological study was conducted. Four hundred and twenty-nine patients (231 male; 198 female) presenting LBP symptoms and referred to conservative treatment were assessed by 13 physical therapists who conducted a 60-min examination process utilizing TBC subgroups. Interrater reliability analyses from six raters were assessed using Fleiss’ kappa and previously recorded data (n = 30).

Results: In this study, 65.74% of patients were classified in only one subgroup, the most prevalent being stabilization (21.91%), followed by extension (15.38%), traction (11.89%), flexion (10.96%), manipulation (5.13%), and lateral shift (0.47%). Approximately 20.98% of patients were classified in two subgroups, where the most frequent overlaps were flexion + stabilization (7.46%), extension + stabilization (6.06%), flexion + traction (4.20%), extension + manipulation (1.86%), and 13.29% of patients were not classified in any TBC subgroup. Analysis of interrater reliability showed a kappa value of 0.62 and an overall agreement of 66% between raters.

Discussion: LBP is a heterogeneous clinical condition and several classification methods are proposed in the attempt to observe better outcomes for patients. Eighty-five percent of patients assessed were able to be classified when using the TBC assessment and reliability analysis showed a substantial agreement between raters.

Level of Evidence: 2c.     

Inter-tester reliability of selected clinical tests for long-lasting temporomandibular disorders

Objective: Clinical tests used to examine patients with temporomandibular disorders vary in methodological quality, and some are not tested for reliability. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate inter-tester reliability of clinical tests and a cluster of tests used to examine patients with long-lasting temporomandibular disorders.

Methods: Forty patients with pain in the temporomandibular area treated by health-professionals were included. They were between 18–70 years, had 65 symptomatic (33 right/32 left) and 15 asymptomatic joints. Two manual therapists examined all participants with selected tests. Percentage agreement and the kappa coefficient (k) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the tests with categorical outcomes. For tests with continuous outcomes, the relative inter-tester reliability was assessed by the intraclass-correlation-coefficient (ICC_3,1, 95% CI) and the absolute reliability was calculated by the smallest detectable change (SDC).

Results: The best reliability among single tests was found for the dental stick test, the joint-sound test (k = 0.80–1.0) and range of mouth-opening (ICC_3,1 (95% CI) = 0.97 (0.95–0.98) and SDC = 4 mm). The reliability of cluster of tests was excellent with both four and five positive tests out of seven.

Conclusion: The reliability was good to excellent for the clinical tests and the cluster of tests when performed by experienced therapists. The tests are feasible for use in the clinical setting. They require no advanced equipment and are easy to perform.     

The relationship between Quebec Task Force Classification and outcome in patients with low back pain treated through mechanical diagnosis and therapy

Objective: To determine the correlation between the Quebec Task Force Classification (QTFC) system and outcome in patients with non-specific low back pain (LBP).

Methods: Forty-nine patients who were treated in outpatient physical therapy clinics of Catholic Health System (CHS) of Western New York (WNY) were classified according to the QTFC at the initial examination by physical therapists (PTs) with training in Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT). The patient’s perceived level of function was assessed with the Focus On Therapeutic Outcomes (FOTO) tool at the initial examination, 2 weeks following the initiation of physical therapy and again at discharge.

Results: A linear regression model between acuity and change in FOTO score was performed and demonstrated statistical significance (P<0·05) as the more favorable outcome was found with the more acute patients. Spearman correlations between change in FOTO score and QTFC, duration of treatment and acuity of condition, and number of visits and change in FOTO score were not found to be statistically significant.

Conclusions: The patients treated in this study demonstrated functional improvement in an average of eight visits, indicating efficacious care. Future research is needed to determine prioritized intervention strategies for designated LBP classifications.     

Peripheral response to cervical or thoracic spinal manual therapy: an evidence-based review with meta analysis

Objectives:

Spinal manual therapy (SMT) is commonly used for treatment of musculoskeletal pain in the neck, upper back, or upper extremity. Some authors report a multi-system effect of SMT, including peripheral alterations in skin conductance and skin temperature, suggesting that SMT may initiate a sympathetic nervous system (SNS) response. The focus of this evidence-based review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the evidence of SNS responses and clinically relevant outcomes following SMT to the cervical or thoracic spine.

Methods:

A systematic search used the terms: ‘manual therapy’, ‘SMT’, ‘spinal manipulation’, ‘mobilization’, ‘SNS’, ‘autonomic nervous system’, ‘neurophysiology’, ‘hypoalgesia’, ‘pain pathophysiology’, ‘cervical vertebrae’, ‘thoracic vertebrae’, ‘upper extremity’, and ‘neurodynamic test’. Data were extracted and within-group and between-group effect sizes were calculated for outcomes of skin conductance, skin temperature, pain, and upper extremity range of motion (ROM) during upper limb neurodynamic tests (ULNTs).

Results:

Eleven studies were identified. Statistically significant changes were seen with increased skin conductance, decreased skin temperature, decreased pain, and increased upper extremity ROM during ULNT.

Discussion:

A mechanical stimulus at the cervical or thoracic spine can produce a SNS excitatory response (increased skin conductance and decreased skin temperature). Findings of reduced pain and increased ROM during ULNT provide support to the clinical relevance of SMT. This evidence points toward additional mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effect of SMT. The effect sizes are small to moderate and no long-term effects post-SMT were collected. Future research is needed to associate peripheral effects with a possible centrally-mediated response to SMT.     

A randomized clinical trial to compare the immediate effects of seated thoracic manipulation and targeted supine thoracic manipulation on cervical spine flexion range of motion and pain

Design:

Randomized clinical trial.

Objectives:

To determine the effectiveness of seated thoracic manipulation versus targeted supine thoracic manipulation on cervical spine pain and flexion range of motion (ROM). There is evidence that thoracic spine manipulation is an effective treatment for patients with cervical spine pain. This evidence includes a variety of techniques to manipulate the thoracic spine. Although each of them is effective, no research has compared techniques to determine which produces the best outcomes.

Methods:

A total of 39 patients with cervical spine pain were randomly assigned to either a seated thoracic manipulation or targeted supine thoracic manipulation group. Pain and flexion ROM measures were taken before and after the intervention.

Results:

Pain reduction (post-treatment–pre-treatment) was significantly greater in those patients receiving the targeted supine thoracic manipulation compared to the seated thoracic manipulation (P<0·05). Although not significant, we did observe greater improvement in flexion ROM in the targeted supine thoracic manipulation group. The results of this study indicate that a targeted supine thoracic manipulation may be more effective in reducing cervical spine pain and improving cervical flexion ROM than a seated thoracic manipulation. Future studies should include a variety of patients and physical therapists (PTs) to validate our findings.     

Breaking down the barriers to physical activity among people with multiple sclerosis – a narrative review

Background: It is recommended that people with multiple sclerosis (MS) exercise at least 30 min three times per week at a moderate level. Exercise trials have shown that when outcomes are reassessed weeks or months after cessation of the program, the benefits gained are lost with values returning to baseline. Clearly, innovative approaches are required to foster continued participation.

Objectives: The objective of this narrative review was to consolidate the evidence examining the barriers to physical activity among people with MS, describe innovative methods to overcome barriers, while discussing the physical therapist’s role as the physical activity promotion specialist.

Major findings: The search yielded 135 articles and after removing duplicates, there were 12 quantitative (total N = 2627) and nine qualitative (total N = 97) studies. The barriers to physical activity were categorized into five domains from greatest to least frequently predictive, (1) MS-related impairment and disability, (2) Attitude and outlook, (3) Fatigue, (4) Knowledge/Perceived benefits of exercise, and (5) Logistical factors: finances, support, and accessibility. Several approaches to break down barriers such as behavioral modification, peer support, use of technology and adapted community exercise show promise in improving physical activity participation. All require the physical therapist to extend their role beyond the patient–provider relationship to become coach, educator, and community liaison.

Conclusions: Physical therapists, other health team members, and volunteers are more likely to be successful in breaking the barriers to physical activity in MS by working together. Barriers can be addressed concurrently by employing tailored and combined approaches using education, motivational interviewing, exercise practice, and problem-solving.     

Strategies to promote family–professional collaboration: two case reports

Purpose: Although research supports family–professional collaboration, challenges to implementation have been reported. The case reports describe the implementation of a 4-step practice model that incorporates specific strategies to facilitate family–professional collaboration.

Method: The participants were two mothers of children with physical disabilities and two physical therapists. Therapists received instruction in the strategies for collaboration including client-centred interview, visualising a preferred future, scaling questions, and family routine and activity matrix. The intervention was implemented during 6-weekly sessions. The 2nd and 5th sessions were videotaped to analyse the interactions between the parent and therapist using Response Class Matrix. Telephone interviews were conducted to explore participants’ experiences.

Results: Therapists were able to implement all strategies following 6 h of instruction. Analysis of the videotapes indicated that mother–therapist interactions were characterised by sharing information and open communication in a mutually supportive manner. Interviews with the mothers and therapists indicated that the therapists engaged the mothers in the intervention process and tailored interventions to child and family needs. The scaling questions were difficult to implement (therapists) and answer (parents).

Conclusion: The findings suggest that the strategies can be used by therapists to promote collaboration and involve parents in setting goals and the intervention process.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• Strategies to promote parent–therapist collaboration include client-centred interview, visualising a preferred future, scaling questions, and family routine and activity matrix.

• Therapists with no previous instruction or training on family-centred services successfully implemented the strategies following 6 h of instruction.

• Interactions between two parent–physical therapist dyads were characterised by sharing information and open communication in a mutually supportive manner following therapist instruction in strategies for parent–therapist collaboration.

     

Effects of cervical manipulation on pain,grip force control,and upper extremity muscle activity: a randomized controlled trial

Objectives: Individuals with neck pain experience disrupted grip force control when performing manipulative tasks. Manipulative physical therapy might decrease pain and change the activity of surrounding muscles; however, its effect on upper limb motor control remains undetermined. This study aims to analyze the effects of cervical manipulation on pressure pain threshold (PPT), upper extremity muscle activity along with grip force control in individuals with neck pain.

Methods: Thirty subjects with neck pain were instructed to grasp and lift an object before and after cervical (n = 15) or sham (n = 15) manipulation. The patients’ PPT, electromyographic (EMG) activity of the upper extremity/scapular muscles, and grip force control were analyzed before and after one session of manipulation.

Results: No significant differences were found in the grip force control, PPT and EMG activity variables between groups.

Discussion: These results suggest that a single session of cervical manipulation may not modify upper limb motor control, more specifically grip force control and EMG activity, in patients with cervical pain. Future studies should investigate potential changes in grip force control in patients with different features of neck pain and/or by applying long-term treatment.

Level of Evidence: 1b.     

Is there preliminary value to a within- and/or between-session change for determining short-term outcomes of manual therapy on mechanical neck pain?

Objectives:

The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether occurrences of within- and between-session changes were significantly associated with functional outcomes, pain, and self-report of recovery in patients at discharge who were treated with manual therapy for mechanical neck pain. A secondary purpose was to determine the extent of change needed for the within- and between-session change in association to function.

Methods:

This secondary data analysis examined 56 patients who demonstrated a positive response to manual therapy during the initial assessment within a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that examined manual therapy techniques and a home exercise program (HEP). Within- and between-session findings were defined as ‘changes in pain report during the initial session (within)’ and ‘changes in pain from baseline to 48-hours post initial assessment (between)’. Outcomes were analyzed for associations with the global rating of change (GRoC), self-report activity scale (SRAS), and a 50% reduction of the neck disability index (NDI) by discharge at 96 hours.

Results:

Findings indicate that within-session pain changes of 36·7% are strongly associated with a 50% change in NDI at 96 hours. Between-session changes in pain were associated with 50% change in NDI and a ≧3-point change in GRoC at 96 hours.

Conclusion:

Both within- and between-session measures may be useful to predict success levels at 96 hours for NDI; however, between-session changes are more useful to predict success in GRoC. Measures used during clinical examination may help guide clinicians in identification of candidates best suited for the treatment.     

Impact of shoulder internal rotation on normal sensory response during ulnar nerve-biased neurodynamic testing of asymptomatic individuals

Objective: To determine if substitution of shoulder internal rotation for external rotation during the upper limb neurodynamic test (ULNT₃) evokes comparable ulnar nerve sensory responses in asymptomatic individuals.

Methods: Range of motion, quality, quantity, and distribution of sensory responses in 50 asymptomatic individuals during the traditional ULNT₃ were compared to identical measures during an experimental maneuver using shoulder internal rotation. Quality and quantity of sensory responses were recorded using a 10-cm visual analog scale.

Results: Means of sensory responses for traditional and experimental maneuvers, respectively, were as follows: stretching, 3.84 ± 8.85 and 5.38 ± 2.85 cm; burning, 1.82 ± 2.82 and 2.50 ± 3.10 cm; tingling, 2.13 ± 3.12 and 2.18 ± 2.97 cm; and numbness, 1.04 ± 2.17 and 1.01 ± 2.03 cm. A moderate to strong correlation (ICC = 0.51–0.86) was shown to exist between maneuvers; this relationship was significant (p = .001).

Discussion: Results of this study provide evidence that there was no appreciable difference in sensory responses with regard to burning and tingling when substituting shoulder internal rotation for external rotation during the ULNT₃. The results also suggest that there were only marginal differences in the sensory responses of stretching and numbness during the same substitution.

Conclusion: Patients who have limited glenohumeral external rotation due to pain, instability, and/or articular limitation may benefit from this substitution when presenting with signs of ulnar nerve pathodynamics. Further research will be needed to validate this maneuver in a symptomatic population.

Level of Evidence: Level 2b.