Influence of St. Jude medical valve in patients with aortic stenosis and small aortic annulus on cardiac function and late survival result

This clinical study analyzes our experience of postoperative cardiac function and long-term survival rate in patients with aortic stenosis and small-size St. Jude Medical (SJM) valve. Sixty-eight patients who underwent aortic valve replacement by SJM valve were divided into two groups by preoperative aortic annulus diameter. Group 1 consisted of 44 patients with small aortic annulus and small-size SJM valve (19 mm or 21 mm). In Group 1, small SJM standard valves were implanted in 16 patients, and small SJM Hemodynamic Plus (HP) valves were implanted in 28 patients. Group 2 consisted of 24 patients with large-size SJM standard valve (23 mm or larger). Preoperative left ventricular mass index, left ventricular dimension, the dimension of ascending aorta, and body surface area were significantly smaller in Group 1 than in Group 2. Average age at surgery was older in Group 1 than in Group 2. Effective orifice area index of the SJM valve measured by the manufacturer's data was smaller in Group 1 than in Group 2. Postoperative left ventricular mass indexes of Group 1 (standard valve or HP valve) and Group 2 significantly decreased in comparison with the preoperative mass indexes. Postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction and the peak ejection rate of Group 1 were not different from those of Group 2. The 10 year survival rate of Group 1 was 79%, and the rate of Group 2 was 77%. At 10 years after surgery, freedom from valve-related complication of Group 1 was 80%, and freedom from complication of Group 2 was 81%. Our results demonstrated that small-size SJM valve afforded satisfactory long-term survival rate and valve-related event-free rate for elderly patients with small body surface area and small aortic annulus.     

Evaluation of St. Jude Medical valve's long-term function by Doppler echocardiography.

In this study, the long-term function of St. Jude Medical valve (SJM valve) is evaluated by Doppler echocardiography. The subjects were 191 patients who underwent mitral or aortic valve replacement using SJM valve in our institute since July 1978 and had no clinical problem showing more than 50% of left ventricular ejection fraction. The patients were classified into 3 groups according to measurement period (within 5 years, 10 years and 15 years and more), and further classified by size and their results were compared. In every group by size, there was no significant difference among groups by measurement period. In the mitral valve position, peak pressure gradient and pressure half-time were not significantly different among groups by size. On the other hand, in the aortic valve position, pressure gradient in 21-mm group was significantly high among 21-mm, 25-mm, and 27-mm groups, showing a negative correlation with size. As the result, it was suggested that SJM valve kept a good function more than 15 years after operation. From these results, it was considered that the patients with small annlus of the aortic valve needed annulus-enlarging procedure or use of Hemodynamic Plus series valves to keep the size of more than 23 mm.     

Changes in patterns of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis and regurgitation with St. Jude Medical cardiac valves

In this study, we analyzed the extent and pattern of regression of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and compared the results with those of another group of patients with aortic regurgitation (AR). Seventy patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 was comprised of 29 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, and Group 2 of 41 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement for aortic regurgitation. A third group of 10 healthy subjects served as a healthy control group. Echocardiographic studies were done before the operation and 5 years postoperatively. At follow-up, a significant reduction in the left ventricular mass was found in both groups, but it remained significantly greater than in the healthy control group. The ratio of LV wall thickness to radius (th/r) in Group 1 decreased significantly, and at follow-up it was within the normal value. In Group 2, the th/r ratio increased, and at follow-up it was within the normal value. After aortic valve replacement, the wall thickness remained significantly greater than normal for patients with AS, and the chamber radius remained significantly greater than normal for patients with AR. For these reasons, LV hypertrophy still existed in both groups at postoperative follow-up. The actuarial survival rate was 85.3% at 16 years for Group 1 and 83.4% at 18 years for Group 2. There was no significant difference in the long-term survival rates between the 2 groups. Actuarial freedom from valve-related events was 91.9% at 16 years for Group 1 and 82% at 18 years for Group 2. There was no significant difference in the valve-related event free curves between groups. After 5 years of follow-up, th/r reached normal for both groups, indicating remodeling of the LV geometry after aortic valve replacement.     

Comparative Rest and Exercise Hemodynamics of Allograft and Prosthetic Valves in the Aortic Position

Background. Allograft aortic valve replacement has gained widespread acceptance. However, there is little information about in vivo allograft valve function at rest and during exercise.

Methods. Cardiac catheterization was performed to measure hemodynamic variables at rest and during supine bicycle exercise in 44 patients who had had aortic valve replacement using allograft valves or Bicer or St. Jude Medical prosthetic valves 19 to 27 mm in diameter. Sixteen patients received an allograft valve; 17, a Bicer valve; and 11, a St. Jude Medical valve. There were no significant differences between the three groups in age, body surface area, left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic volume indices, exercise cardiac index, exercise heart rate, or work load achieved. Left ventricular and ascending aortic pressures were measured simultaneously according to the transseptal method.

Results. The mean pressure gradient was generally higher for the Bicer and St. Jude Medical valves than for the allograft valves, both at rest and during exercise. Significant differences were obtained in patients with small-sized valves (21 and 23 mm); pressure gradients were higher in the prosthetic valve groups. In patients with large-sized prosthetic valves (25 mm), there were no significant differences between the three groups at rest and during exercise. However, there was no pressure gradient at all for allograft valves.

Conclusions. Exercise cardiac catheterization confirms that the allograft aortic valve is an ideal substitute from the hemodynamic aspect, particularly in patients with a small aortic root and in those who perform strenuous exercise.     

Doppler Sonographic Evaluation of the CarboMedics Bileaf let Valve Prosthesis: One-Year Experience

Between April 1989 and March 1991, 237 CarboMedics bileaflet valve prosthesis carriers (165 aortic and 72 mitral valves, mean age 54.4 years) were studied prospectively with pulsed- and continuous-wave Doppler at a mean interval of 11.4 months following surgery in order to establish ranges of normal flow velocities and pressure gradients. Physical examination revealed no signs of prosthetic dysfunction or heart failure. Postoperative left ventricular function as measured by fractional shortening was 37% for aortic valve carriers and 30% for mitral valve carriers (p = NS). Mean peak velocity (+/- SD) across the aortic valve was 2.6 m/sec (+/- 0.4) and calculated instantaneous peak pressure gradient ranged from 11 to 58 mmHg (mean 28.1 +/- 10.3). It has to be emphasized that occasional patients with normally functioning valve prostheses can show unusual high gradients. Ring diameters between 21 and 27 mm showed no significant difference with regard to flow velocities and pressure gradients, whereas in 19-mm valves, significantly higher values could be demonstrated. The 123 aortic valve carriers with normal left ventricular function (fractional shortening greater than 25%) showed significantly higher pressure gradients than the 19 patients with reduced left ventricular function (28.6 +/- 11.6 mmHg vs 16.2 +/- 5.1 mmHg, p less than 0.05). In the mitral position, the mean of peak velocity (+/- SD) was 1.7 +/- 0.4 m/sec and pressure half-time was 108 +/- 26 msec, representing a calculated valve area between 1.4 to 3.1 cm2 (mean orifice size 2.1 +/- 0.5 cm2). No significant difference between valves of different sizes was found.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The evaluation of pressure gradients of various aortic valve prostheses by Doppler ultrasound and influence of pressure gradients to left ventricular function

Although the pressure gradients of heart valve prostheses has been discussed over the years, currently available valve prostheses are still not sufficient and may leave pressure gradients following aortic valve replacement. The selection of valve prosthesis and its size is still controversial. This study is aimed to measure the pressure gradients of 64 aortic valve prostheses noninvasively by means of doppler ultrasound and determine which size and what kind of valve prosthesis is suitable for aortic valve replacement. 1. Pressure gradients and LV function were serially assessed pre- and post operatively. Left ventricular mass index regressed to a normal range and the response to exercise test is quite satisfactory in the patients whose pressure gradients were less than 25 mmHg. In the cases that showed pressure gradients more than 25 mmHg, however, left ventricular hypertrophy significantly remained even 5 years after aortic valve replacement and the response to exercise was not good enough. From these results, it is concluded that the upper limit of acceptable pressure gradients is 25 mmHg in aortic valve prosthesis. 2. The pressure gradients of St. Jude Medical (SJM) valve (11 cases), Bj?rk-Shiley (B-S) valve (7 cases), Lillehei-Kaster (L-K) valve (13 cases) and Omniscience (O-S) valve (33 cases) was evaluated to compare the hemodynamic characteristics in the long term follow-up periods. In SJM and B-S, a correlation between valve area index (geometrical valve orifice area/body surface area) and pressure gradients was significant. The valve area index more than 1.4 cm2/m2 in SJM or more than 1.7 cm2/m2 in B-S should be selected. Whereas for L-K and O-S, a correlation between valve area index and pressure gradients was not significant and it is suggested that his is due to suboptimal disc opening angle (L-K; 54 degree on the average, O-S; 46 degree on the average). For this reason, the use of these prostheses is not recommended for choice in the aortic position.     

小主动脉瓣环患者机械瓣置换术后中期疗效分析

目的观察小主动脉瓣环患者行心瓣膜置换术后中期疗效和心功能恢复情况，探讨小口径瓣膜的使用范围。方法1990年7月至2003年6月共对62例患者施行19号主动脉机械瓣膜置换术（19mm瓣膜组），同时选择62例同期置换21号以上机械瓣膜患者做对照（21mm瓣膜组）；术后随访两组患者的临床症状、体征，心电图、超声心动图等指标，采用Kaplan—Meier分析生存曲线计算两组患者的生存率，并进行比较分析。结果19mm瓣膜组中有38例主动脉瓣区仍存在Ⅱ级以上杂音，心电图检查18例有ST段改变，术后11例仍存在胸闷、胸痛症状，术后心功能Ⅱ级33例，Ⅲ级29例；21mm瓣膜组术后心电图检查6例有ST段改变，术后3例有胸闷症状，偶尔有胸痛不适6例，术后心功能Ⅱ级48例，Ⅲ级14例，两组间比较差异有统计学意义（P=0．020）。两组患者术后左心室舒张期末内径、左心室后壁厚度、左心室重量指数、主动脉跨瓣压差等均较术前明显改善（P〈0．05），左心室射血分数（LVEF）术后5年与术前比较明显提高（P〈0．05），但两组间比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。19mm瓣膜组术后1年、5年生存率分别为93．5％、74．2％；21mm瓣膜组术后1年、5年生存率分别为95．2％、79．0％，两组间比较差异无统计学意义（P=0．231，0．110）。结论小口径主动脉瓣置换术能取得良好的效果和中期生存率。     

Initial in vivo results of the new Medtronic Advantage(TM) bileaflet valve in aortic position and comparison to the SJM

The present study investigated the Medtronic Advantage (MA) bileaflet valve in an animal model and compared the results to the St. Jude Medical (SJM) valve. Systolic performance and coronary artery flow in different orientations were studied.A rotation device holding either a MA or SJM aortic valve size 23 mm was implanted into eight pigs. Transvalvular pressure gradients and ventricular dimensions were investigated with the valves in different orientations. Coronary artery flow was measured at normal and high cardiac output.Orientation significantly influenced the hemodynamic performance of both valves. The best results for both valves were obtained with one orifice proximal to the right cusp. Pressure gradients and ventricular dimensions of the MA corresponded to the SJM. Coronary artery flow was higher for the MA.The systolic performance of the new MA bileaflet valve was similar to the SJM. During diastole, the MA showed significantly higher LAD coronary flow.     

Hernodynamic Performance of the St. Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus Valve

Abstract: The hemodynamic performance of the St. Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus valve (HP) for a small aortic annulus was compared to that of the standard St. Jude Medical valve (SJM). Doppler echocardiographic parameters were evaluated in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with either a 19 mm HP (HP19, n = 71, a 21 mm HP (HP21, n = S), a 19 mm SJM (SJM19, n = 16), or a 21 mm SJM (SJM21, n = 34). The peak and mean pres sure gradients and peak flow velocity were significantly (p < 0.05) lower in both patients with the HP21 and those with the HP19 than patients with the SJM21 and those with the SJM19, respectively. The echocardiographic parameters of the patients with the HP19 corresponded closely to those of patients with the SJM21. The left ventricular mass index regressed markedly in patients with the HP19 during the late postoperative period. The results suggested that the hemodynamic performances of certain sizes of the HP were superior to those of the same sue SJMs and were considered to be equivalent to those of the next size larger SJM.     

Comparative analysis of mechanical and biological prosthetic valves after isolated valve replacement--cooperative study on total 1281 patients

A total of 1281 patients (594 aortic and 687 mitral) received 734 mechanical valves (320 Bj?rk-Shiley, 283 SJM and 131 Omniscience) and 547 biological (259 ionescu-Shiley, 227 Hancock, and 61 Carpentier-Edwards) were analyzed for postoperative valve dysfunction and thromboembolism. The actuarial survival rates (free from late cardiac deaths and valve-related deaths) were 88.6% (11 years) for mechanical mitral and 86.0% (11 years) for biological mitral valves, and 91.7% (16 years) and 88.5% (12 years), for mechanical and biological aortic valves, respectively. There were no significant differences among these groups. Actuarial rates of freedom from valve-related events were 88.7% (11 years) and 51.7%, for mechanical and biological mitral valves, respectively. There was significant difference between the two types of valves in over 7 years after surgery. In contrast, there were no significant differences between mechanical and biological aortic valves. Actuarial rates of freedom from valve dysfunction were 97.6% (11 years) for mechanical and 56.5% (12 years) for biological mitral valves. The net 12 year results showed no significant differences between the two types of mitral prosthetic valves, but a significantly increased rate of valve dysfunction in the biological mitral valves compared with the mechanical in over 6 years of the study. Concerning AVR, there were no significant differences in the incidence of valve dysfunction between mechanical and biological aortic valves. Actuarial rates of freedom thromboembolism were 92.3% (11 years) and 93.8% (11 years) for mechanical and biological mitral valves, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two types of mitral prosthetic valves.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Clinical evaluation of ATS prosthetic valve by doppler echocardiography: comparison with St. Jude Medical (SJM) valve.

ATS valve is a bileaflet valve developed to have a superior function to traditional prosthetic valves on anti-thrombogenesis and hemolysis. The orifice area was enlarged in consequence of making its orifice with pyrolytic carbon materials, and the pivot was open pivot and the strut was eliminated. The efficiency of this valve has been reported in the Europe. In Japan, its clinical trial was performed in September 1993 and its clinical use was permitted in August 1996. In this study, we compared the functions of ATS and St. Jude Medical (SJM) valves with echocardiography. The pressure gradients at the mitral valve position were not significantly different between ATS and SJM valves, but that of ATS was lower than that of SJM. The pressure gradient at the aortic valve position of ATS was also lower than that of SJM, and especially those of the patients who performed aortic valve replacement with 23-mm ATS and SJM valves were 8.9+/-1.6 and 23.3+/-6.6 mmHg, showing a significant difference. Though further observation and review of this valve are needed at the chronic phase, ATS valve is an excellent bileaflet valve on the valvular function, showing a low pressure gradient.     

Evaluation of postoperative cardiac function and long-term results in patients after aortic valve replacement for aortic valve disease with increased left ventricular mass.

OBJECTIVE: This clinical study was designed to evaluate the postoperative cardiac function in patients after aortic valve replacement for aortic valve disease with increased left ventricular mass. METHODS: Aortic valve replacement was performed in 117 patients using the St. Jude Medical valve. Their valve lesion was aortic regurgitation in 71, and aortic stenosis in 46. The mean value of the left ventricular mass index was 272 g/m2. The 117 patients were subdivided into 4 groups according to their preoperative left ventricular mass index-Group I (n = 35) with aortic regurgitation and a large left ventricular mass index (> or = 273 g/m2), Group II (n = 36) with aortic regurgitation and a small left ventricular mass index Group III (n = 19) with aortic stenosis and a large left ventricular mass index, and Group IV (n = 27) with aortic stenosis and a small left ventricular mass index. The cardiac function was evaluated by radionuclide ventriculography. RESULTS: In a comparative study of postoperative parameters among the 4 groups, the postoperative systolic and diastolic parameters of Group I patients were more significantly impaired compared with these parameters of the other 3 groups. The postoperative values the left ventricular mass index were significantly higher in Group I than in the other 3 groups. The 10-year survival rate was significantly lower in Group I than in the other 3 groups (30 +/- 22% in Group I). CONCLUSION: Aortic valve replacement is recommended for patients with eccentric hypertrophy in the adequate clinical phase of patients whose left ventricular mass index is less than 272 g/m2.     

Tricuspid valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical valve

A study was conducted on 20 patients who underwent tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) with the St. Jude Medical (SJM) valve. Isolated TVR was performed on 9 patients, and additional mitral, or mitral and aortic valve replacements were performed on 11 patients. Four patients (20%) died in the early postoperative period, but there were no deaths related to the SJM valve in the tricuspid position. The mean follow-up period of the 16 survivors was 74.4 months, and there have been no deaths during the follow-up period. The postoperative actuarial survival rate was 80%, 10 years after surgery. Three patients, representing 0.25%/patient-months, developed valve thrombosis, the valve thrombosis-free rate being 72.8%, 10 years after surgery, while entrapment of a leaflet by endothelial pannus was found in one patient, representing 0.08%/patient-months. Thus, the incidence of all prosthetic valve-related complications was 0.34%/patient-months, and the postoperative complication-free rate was 65.3%, 10 years after surgery. The medium-term follow-up study of TVR with the SJM valve revealed no prosthetic valve-related deaths and a relatively low incidence of prosthetic valve-related complications. However, as with other mechanical valves, valve thrombosis was a major risk posed by the SJM valve in the tricuspid position.     

Long-term results of conventional aortic valve replacement for small aortic annulus

We studied cardiac function, clinical outcome and quality of life (QOL) long after aortic valve replacement for pure aortic stenosis. Forty-four patients in small group [St. Jude Medical (SJM) 17 HP, 19 A], and 69 patients in non-small group (19 HP, 21 A, 23 A) operated on from 1984 to 2004 were enrolled in this study. We assessed the clinical data, aortic pressure gradient, left ventricular mass index (LVMI), and ejection fraction (EF) by preoperative and postoperative echocardiography. Moreover to evaluate QOL after the operation, we performed SF-36 used for the evaluation of health and QOL worldwide. Mean follow-up is 7.1 +/- 4.8 years in small group, and 6.8 +/- 4.6 years in non-small group. There were 2 hospital deaths in small group, and 1 in non-small group. The actual survival rate at 10-year were 89.2% in small group, and 85.6% in non-small group. There was no significant difference in hospital mortality, LVMI, long-term survival rate, and the scores of SF-36 between the 2 groups. The use of small sized prosthetic valves in patients with small aortic annulus might be justified when there is no patient-prosthesis mismatch.     

Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in the elderly: influence of prosthesis-patient mismatch on late survival and left ventricular mass regression

PURPOSE: Controversy still exists about the influence of prosthesis-patient mismatch on outcomes after aortic valve replacement in the elderly. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on survival and the extent of left ventricular (LV) mass regression after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in Japanese patients aged >or=65 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 84 patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis between 1986 and 2006 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the definition of prosthesis-patient mismatch (indexed effective orifice area 相似文献   

Long-term results for aortic valve replacement with small aortic annulus

We determined whether aortic prosthesis size influences survival and hemodynamic function. Eighty-nine patients who underwent small aortic valve replacement were followed. The small internal orifice area index (IOAI) group was defined as having an internal orifice area/body surface area ratio of < or = 1.3 cm(2)/m(2) (n = 34). The control group was defined as having an IOAI >1.3 cm(2)/m(2) (n = 55). The actuarial survival rate at 10 years was 74.5% in the small IOAI group and 75% in the control group (NS). Freedom from valve-related impairment at 10 years was 87% in the small IOAI group and 85% in the control group (NS). Postoperative pressure gradients were higher in the small IOAI group (p < 0.05). Left ventricular mass index decreased in both groups (albeit nonsignificantly in the small group, but significantly decreased in the control group). The long-term results of aortic valve replacement for patients with small aortic annulus were satisfactory. However, the postoperative pressure gradient through the prosthesis and left ventricular hypertrophy remained at a high level in the small IOAI group.     

Comparison of the effects of aortic valve replacement using 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis and 19-mm Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis.

OBJECTIVE: Short (< or =3 months)- and middle (> or =4 months)-term results of aortic valve replacement (AVR) using 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards Perimount (CEP) bioprosthetic valves and 19-mm Medtronic Mosaic (MM) bioprosthetic valves in patients with small aortic annulus were compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS: At our facility, AVR was performed using bioprostheses in 110 patients from April 1999 to March 2006. Of these patients, 40 were treated using 19-mm CEP (Group C), and 9 using 19-mm MM (Group M). Evaluation by inquiry, physical examination, and echocardiography was performed before, a short term after, and a middle term after surgery, and the effects of AVR were compared. RESULTS: The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class grade showed improvements in both groups. The aortic valve peak pressure gradient was 29.8 +/- 10.1 mmHg in Group C and 53.8 +/- 17.3 mmHg in Group M, being higher in Group M, a middle term after surgery. However, the left ventricular mass index (LVMI) showed improvements in both groups compared with the values before surgery, and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was maintained. During the middle term after surgery, the frequency of cardiac events showed no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the patients treated with 19-mm MM, the aortic valve peak pressure gradient was higher than in those treated with 19-mm CEP, but acceptable improvements in the LVMI, maintenance of the LVEF, and avoidance of cardiac events were observed in both groups.     

Experimental evaluation and early clinical results of a new low-profile bileaflet aortic valve

We performed an experimental and clinical evaluation of a new low-profile bileaflet aortic valve (Regent, St. Jude Medical Inc., St. Paul, MN, U.S.A.). Common valve sizes were experimentally tested for leakage volume, pressure drop, and transvalvular hemodynamics using a pulse duplicator. Thirty patients (mean age 60 +/- 7 years, predominant valve stenosis n = 25) received the Regent prosthesis for initial clinical evaluation. In vitro evaluation revealed equivalent leakage volumes, larger performance indices (0.552 versus 0.513), and lower pressure drops in comparison to SJM hemodynamic plus valve controls. Clinically, 21 mm (n = 9), 23 mm (n = 12), and 25 mm (n = 9) valves were implanted with no significant perioperative complications. Echocardiography revealed low transvalvular flow velocities (2.2 +/- 0.4 m/s) and low pressure gradients (20 +/- 6 mm Hg) postoperatively and at 6 months follow-up. In vitro testing and early clinical results are promising; however, long-term performance has to be proven.     

Two cases of Konno's operation for aortic stenosis developing after repair of interruption of the aortic arch with ventricular septal defect

Two patients, 8-year-old and 7-year-old boys, underwent Konno's operation for left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, which had developed after the repair of interrupted aortic arch and ventricular septal defect. Both cases had bicuspid aortic valve and severe subaortic stenosis. The annular diameters were 15 mm and 16 mm, and pressure gradients between the left ventricle and the ascending aorta were 110 mmHg and 105 mmHg, respectively. A SJM prosthetic valve (23 mm, 25 mm) was used. Postoperative courses were good. Left ventricular outflow anomalies are frequently found in cases of interrupted aortic arch complicated with ventricular septal defect. The stenosis not infrequently develops and becomes apparent several years after primary or staged repair for interrupted arch with VSD as in the present cases. Therefore, careful observation should be carried out following the repair. Konno's operation can be safely performed for this lesion with low mortality and morbidity for valvular and subvalvular aortic stenosis even with small aortic ring.     

Accessory mitral valve associated with aortic regurgitation in an elderly patient: report of a case

We encountered a 75-year-old man who complained of exertional dyspnea. An echocardiographic examination showed aortic regurgitation and a tumor in the left ventricular outflow tract. Under complete extracorporeal circulation, we surgically made an incision of the ascending aorta with a slight thickening of the aortic valve and an enlarged annulus. After excising the aortic valve, an examination of the subvalvular region revealed mitral valve-like tissue extending from the annular region of the right coronary cusp to the ventricular septum, while the chordae tendinae was attached to the septum. This issue was excised, and the aortic valve was replaced with a 27-mm SJM valve. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged in good condition on postoperative day 30. An accessory mitral valve is extremely rare. Since this indication for surgical treatment is associated with congenital heart disease or a left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, most patients are young. Our patient had no associated cardiac anomalies and no pressure gradient attributable to a left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. This accessory mitral valve was discovered during aortic valve replacement surgery. To our knowledge, our patient is the oldest reported with an accessory mitral valve to have undergone a surgical resection.