Predictors of event-free survival after repeat intracoronary procedure for in-stent restenosis; study with angiographic and intravascular ultrasound imaging.

AIMS: Lumen enlargement during repeat percutaneous coronary intervention for in-stent restenosis has been shown to be the result of both stent over-expansion and decrease in neointimal tissue. How these two different mechanisms of action may influence outcome and target lesion revascularization after repeat intervention for in-stent restenosis is unclear. METHODS: Intravascular ultrasound guided repeat intervention for in-stent restenosis was carried out either with balloon angioplasty, or with a combination of rotational atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty. Clinical follow-up at 1 year, including death, myocardial infarction, or need for revascularization, was obtained. RESULTS: Seventy patients were included in this study; 40 were treated by balloon alone, and 30 by combination of rotational atherectomy plus balloon. Event-free survival probability was 76+/-5%. The mechanism of lumen enlargement, be it stent over-expansion or tissue removal, had no influence on long-term clinical evolution. The only independent predictor was the minimal lumen cross-sectional area at the end of the procedure, the larger the lumen cross-sectional area, the higher the event-free probability. The cut-off point of the lumen cross-sectional area was set at 4.7 mm(2)by discriminant analysis. Event-free survival was 69+/-15% in patients with <4.7 mm(2)lumen cross-sectional area and 91+/-8% in patients with >4.7 mm(2)lumen cross-sectional area (P=0. 008). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the only independent predictor of late clinical outcome after percutaneous re-intervention for in-stent restenosis was final lumen size, no matter which means were used to achieve it.     

Treatment of in-stent restenosis with high speed rotational atherectomy and IVUS guidance in small <3.0 mm vessels

The management of in-stent restenosis remains a subject for debate because no one revascularization option is considered the most appropriate. Since a high restenosis rate still occurs after repeat balloon angioplasty, new techniques are attempted in order to reduce this rate. A combination of high speed rotational atherectomy (HSRA) and adjunctive balloon angioplasty is likely to achieve good results. In small (<3.0 mm diameter) vessels, the risk of interaction between the burr and the stent increases. We thus used intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance in the treatment of in-stent restenosis with HSRA in small <3.0 mm small diameter vessels. Nine patients with in-stent restenosis in small vessels were referred for repeat angioplasty. Initial IVUS examination was used to assess the minimal stent struts diameter and to guide the burr size selection. A combination of HSRA and additional balloon angioplasty was performed under IVUS and angiographic guidance. Mean angiographic reference diameter was 2.25 ± 0.35 mm and mean stent struts diameter was 2.38 ± 0.20 mm. Burr size was selected ∼0.5 mm smaller than stent struts diameter and ranged from 1.75 to 2.5 mm, with a 0.88 ± 0.12 mean burr/artery ratio (range 0.71, 1.08). In two patients, a second larger burr was used. In 4/9 patients, the burr size chosen under IVUS guidance was close to angiographic MLD at stent implantation and thus larger than what would be used without IVUS guidance. Additional balloon angioplasty was decided in all cases, using a 1.1 ± 0.15 balloon/artery ratio. No complication occurred. Mean relative gain in minimal lumen diameter (MLD) was 94 ± 90% after HSRA and 54 ± 34% after balloon angioplasty (total relative gain 180 ± 100%). IVUS guidance allowed safe management of in-stent restenosis in small vessels using combination of HSRA and balloon angioplasty. Long-term follow-up and comparison with other techniques are necessary to assess whether this technique should be used routinely. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn. 44:77–82, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

A randomized comparison of balloon angioplasty versus rotational atherectomy in complex coronary lesions (COBRA study).

AIMS: Rotablation is a widely used technique for the treatment of complex coronary artery lesions but is so far only poorly supported by controlled studies. The Comparison of Balloon-Angioplasty versus Rotational Atherectomy study (COBRA) is a multicentre, prospective, randomized trial to compare short- and long-term effects of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and rotablation in patients with angiographically pre-defined complex coronary artery lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: At seven clinical sites 502 patients with pre-defined complex coronary artery lesions were assigned to either PTCA (n=250) or rotablation (n=252). Primary end-points were procedural success, 6-month restenosis rates in the treated segments, and major cardiac events during follow-up. Procedural success was achieved in 78% (PTCA), and 85% (rotablation) (P=0.038) of cases. Crossover from PTCA to rotablation was 4% and 10% vice versa (P=0.019). There was no difference between PTCA and rotablation with respect to procedure-related complications such as Q wave infarctions (2.4% each), emergency bypass surgery (1.2% versus 2.4%), and death (1.6% versus 0.4%). However, more stents were required after PTCA (14.9% versus 6.4%, P<0.002), predominantly for bailout or unsatisfactory results. Including bail-out stents as an end-point, the procedural success rates were 73% for angioplasty and 84% for rotablation (P=0.006). At 6 months, symptomatic outcome, target vessel reinterventions and restenosis rates (PTCA 51% versus rotablation 49%, P=0.33) were not different. CONCLUSION: Complex coronary artery lesions can be treated with a high level of success and low complication rates either by PTCA with adjunctive stenting or rotablation. The long-term clinical and angiographic outcome is comparable.     

Mechanism of cutting balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis: an intravascular ultrasound study.

We investigated by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) the mechanism of action of cutting balloon (CB) angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis. Seventy-one consecutive restenotic lesions of 66 patients were studied by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and IVUS before, immediately after, and, in 20 cases, at 24-hr time interval after CB. CB was selected according to 1:1 CB-to-stent ratio and inflated at 8 atm for 60-90 sec. Both IVUS planar and volumetric (Simpson's rule, 25 patients) analysis were carried out. IVUS measurements included external elastic membrane area (EEMA), stent area (SA), minimal lumen area (MLA), and restenosis area (RA). Following CB, QCA analysis showed increase of minimal lumen diameter (1.17 +/- 0.46 vs. 2.45 +/- 0.51 mm; P < 0.0001) and decrease of diameter stenosis (64% +/- 13% vs. 21% +/- 9%; P < 0.0001). IVUS measurements showed a significant increase of MLA (2.18 +/- 0.80 vs. 7.31 +/- 1.8 mm(2); P < 0.0001), SA (9.62 +/- 2.6 vs. 10.7 +/- 2.75 mm(2); P < 0.0001), and EEMA (17.27 +/- 5 vs. 18.1 +/- 5 mm(2); P < 0.0001) and a decrease of RA (7.43 +/- 2.63 vs. 3.45 +/- 1.39 mm(2); P < 0.0001). No significant change was observed in the original plaque + media area (7.65 +/- 3 vs. 7.38 +/- 2.9 mm(2); P = NS). Thus, of the total lumen enlargement (5.13 +/- 1.85 mm(2)), 23% was the result of increase in mean SA, whereas 77% was the result of a decrease in mean RA. These changes were associated with a 5% increase in EEMA. IVUS volumetric changes paralleled planar variations. Angiographic and IVUS changes were well maintained at 24 hr. CB enlarges coronary lumen mainly by in-stent tissue reduction associated with a moderate degree of additional stent expansion. Favorable QCA and IVUS acute results are maintained at 24 hr.     

Effects of increasing balloon pressure on mechanism and results of balloon angioplasty for treatment of restenosis after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation: An angiographic and intravascular ultrasound study

Repeat balloon angioplasty is a widely used therapeutic option for in-stent restenosis, but the optimal balloon inflation pressure has not yet been determined. We used angiography and intravascular ultrasound imaging to assess the mechanism and results of lumen enlargement at various inflation pressures. Thirteen consecutive patients with restenosis post–Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation were submitted to a four-step balloon angioplasty using increasing balloon pressure of 2, 4, 8, and >12 atm. As a global result, the lumen size was only 80% of that observed at stent implantation. Significant changes in angiographic minimal lumen diameter, minimal lumen cross-sectional area, and lumen volume were observed after each step except after the highest-pressure inflation. At low inflation pressure (<8 atm), the decrease in neointimal tissue and the stent over expansion explained the lumen enlargement, whereas after further high inflation pressure (>8 atm), only additional stent over expansion was observed. These results suggest that only moderate balloon inflation pressure (up to 12 atm) is needed for angioplasty of post–Palmaz-Schatz stent restenotic lesions. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 46:314–321, 1999. © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Three dimensional intravascular ultrasonic assessment of the local mechanism of restenosis after balloon angioplasty

OBJECTIVE—To assess the mechanism of restenosis after balloon angioplasty.
DESIGN—Prospective study.
PATIENTS—13 patients treated with balloon angioplasty.
INTERVENTIONS—111 coronary subsegments (2 mm each) were analysed after balloon angioplasty and at a six month follow up using three dimensional intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES—Qualitative and quantitative IVUS analysis. Total vessel (external elastic membrane), plaque, and lumen volume were measured in each 2 mm subsegment. Delta values were calculated (follow up − postprocedure). Remodelling was defined as any (positive or negative) change in total vessel volume.
RESULTS—Positive remodelling was observed in 52 subsegments while negative remodelling occurred in 44. Remodelling, plaque type, and dissection were heterogeneously distributed along the coronary segments. Plaque composition was not associated with changes in IVUS indices, whereas dissected subsegments had a greater increase in total vessel volume than those without dissection (1.7 mm³ v −0.33 mm³, p = 0.04). Change in total vessel volume was correlated with changes in lumen (p < 0.05, r = 0.56) and plaque volumes (p < 0.05, r = 0.64). The site with maximum lumen loss was not the same site as the minimum lumen area at follow up in the majority (n = 10) of the vessels. In the multivariate model, residual plaque burden had an influence on negative remodelling (p = 0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.391 to −0.108), whereas dissection had an effect on total vessel increase (p = 0.002, 95% CI 1.168 to 4.969).
CONCLUSIONS—The mechanism of lumen renarrowing after balloon angioplasty appears to be determined by unfavourable remodelling. However, different patterns of remodelling may occur in individual injured coronary segments, which highlights the complexity and influence of local factors in the restenotic process.


Keywords: balloon angioplasty; intravascular ultrasound; remodelling; restenosis     

Sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in comparison with balloon angioplasty for treatment of in-stent restenosis.

This study evaluated the acute and follow-up effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) and nonpolymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents (PESs) in comparison will balloon angioplasty for treatment of complex in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions. Drug-eluting stents have been demonstrated to be highly effective for treatment of de novo lesions. The use of drug-eluting stents for treatment of complex ISR is less well defined. Eighty one lesions with in-stent restenosis (lesion length < 30 mm in a native coronary artery) were treated with either PTCA alone (n = 26 lesions in 25 patients), PES (n = 27 lesions in 24 patients; Achieve, Cook; 3,1 mug paclitaxel/mm(2) nonpolymer-based coating), SES (n = 28 lesions in 28 patients; Cypher, Cordis; 140 mug sirolimus/cm(2) metal surface area). Nine-month MACE rates were 32%, 8%, and 14% (all due to repeated revascularization procedures, except one death in the SES group) in the PTCA, PES, and SES group, respectively. Postintervention minimal lumen diameter in stent was significantly greater in the SES and the PES group in comparison with the PTCA group (2.37 +/- 0.26, 2.54 +/- 0.42, 1.78 +/- 0.23 mm; P < 0.001). At 6-month angiographic follow-up, late loss in stent was 0.77 +/- 0.45, 0.43 +/- 0.53, and 0.29 +/- 0.52 mm for the PTCA, PES, and SES group, respectively (P = 0.005). In-lesion restenosis rate was 61% for the PTCA group, 20% for the PES group, and 13% for the SES group (P = 0.042). The implantation of SES as well as nonpolymer PES proved to be effective for treatment of ISR. The combination of improved acute gain and reduced late loss results in a significantly improved angiographic follow-up result in comparison with PTCA.     

Neointimal response following rotational atherectomy compared to balloon angioplasty in a porcine model of coronary in-stent restenosis

In-stent restenosis remains a clinical therapeutic challenge. Rotational atherectomy (RA) is an attractive treatment option as it may cause less vascular injury than balloon angioplasty (BA) and, therefore, limit further neointimal response. In an animal model of coronary in-stent restenosis, thermal injury and stenting created neointima (old NI). The treatment of in-stent restenosis with either BA (n = 9) or RA (n = 11) also generated neointima (new NI). The average areas (mm²) of old NI in the BA and RA groups were similar (3.77 ± 0.40 vs. 3.67 ± 0.53; P = 0.32). However, new NI formed after treatment of in-stent restenosis was significantly less in the RA as compared to the BA group (0.33 ± 0.12 vs. 0.73 ± 36, P < 0.01). In this porcine coronary artery model of in-stent restenosis, treatment with rotational atherectomy resulted in significantly less recurrent neointimal hyperplasia than balloon angioplasty. This animal study, thus, provides a rationale for the clinical use of rotablation in the treatment of in-stent restenosis. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn. 45:332–336, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Percutaneous treatment of focal vs. diffuse in-stent restenosis: a prospective randomized comparison of conventional therapies.

Few randomized studies compare outcomes for focal vs. diffuse in-stent restenosis (ISR) using conventional treatments. The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) for focal vs. diffuse ISR using conventional techniques. One hundred thirteen patients with ISR were prospectively classified as focal (< 10 mm) or diffuse (> 10 mm). Focal ISR was randomized to balloon angioplasty (n = 29) or restenting (n = 29) and diffuse ISR randomized to rotational atherectomy (n = 30) or restenting (n = 25). At 9 months, patients with focal ISR had higher survival free of MACEs than patients with diffuse ISR (86% vs. 63%; P < 0.005), with no difference between techniques. Only the presence of diffuse ISR was an independent predictor of MACE at 9 months. Thus, focal ISR has a low rate of MACE compared to diffuse ISR, which carries a high event rate regardless of treatment employed.     

Angiographic analysis of the angioplasty versus rotational atherectomy for the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis trial (ARTIST)

Patients with diffuse in-stent restenoses (ISRs) are at high risk for recurrent restenosis after percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTCA). Percutaneous transluminal rotational ablation (PTCR) has proved effective in removing neointimal burden in ISRs. This study compares the acute and long-term results of PTCA and PTCR for the treatment of diffuse ISR in a randomized, multicenter investigation. The primary end point was the comparison of the minimum luminal diameter (MLD) between both groups at 6-month follow-up. Patients with symptomatic, diffuse, or high-grade ISRs were included; 146 patients were randomized to PTCA and 152 patients to PTCR. Diameter stenosis was reduced from 80 +/- 12% to 29 +/- 10% and from 80 +/- 11% to 28 +/- 12%, respectively, and MLD increased from 0.55 +/- 0.3 to 1.9 +/- 0.3 mm in the PTCA group and from 0.54 +/- 0.3 mm to 1.9 +/- 0.4 mm in the PTCR group. Spasm in the treated vessel and an intermittent slow flow phenomenon occurred more often after rotational ablation (17.7% vs 8.6%, p = 0.001; 5.3% vs 0%, p = 0.007). Minimum stenosis diameter at 6-month follow-up was smaller in the PTCR group than in the PTCA group (1.0 +/- 0.6 vs 1.2 +/- 0.6 mm, p = 0.008) and the restenosis rate was higher (64.9% vs 51.2%, p = 0.027). Procedural factors did not influence long-term outcome. In the PTCR group, the restenosis rate increased with decreasing vessel size, whereas this was not seen in the PTCA group. The lesion length and the baseline diameter stenosis were found to be predictive of restenosis with both treatment strategies; however, a residual diameter stenosis of <30% predicted absence of a restenosis only in the PTCR group. Thus, PTCA and PTCR of diffuse ISRs yield comparable acute angiographic results. The recurrence of a restenosis is higher after PTCR than after PTCA.     

Impact of the acute results on the long-term outcome after the treatment of in-stent restenosis: a serial intravascular ultrasound study.

The current study used serial (postintervention and follow-up) intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to assess the impact of acute results on long-term follow-up of patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). All patients (n = 180) with serial IVUS studies of ISR lesions from the following gamma-irradiation brachytherapy trials were included: Washington Radiation for In-Stent Restenosis Trial (WRIST), Gamma-1, and Angiorad Radiation Technology for In-Stent Restenosis Trial in Native Coronaries (ARTISTIC). There were 106 irradiated and 74 placebo patients. Quantitative analysis was performed according to the American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of IVUS. Images were acquired using motorized transducer pullback, cross-sectional analysis was performed every 1 mm, and volumetric and mean planar dimensions were calculated. The independent predictors for the absolute follow-up minimum lumen area (MLA) were the postintervention MLA, the postintervention minimum stent area, and the use of brachytherapy. Placebo patients lost 45% of the postintervention MLA while irradiated patients lost only 17% of the MLA. The independent predictors of the follow-up percent intimal hyperplasia (intimal hyperplasia volume divided by stent volume) and the independent predictors of the absolute increase in intimal hyperplasia were the postintervention percent intimal hyperplasia and the use of brachytherapy. Serial IVUS analysis shows that the follow-up MLA and percent intimal hyperplasia are dependent on the results obtained during the treatment of ISR lesions.     

Vascular response to sirolimus-eluting stents delivered with a nonaggressive implantation technique: comparison of intravascular ultrasound results from the multicenter, randomized E-SIRIUS, and SIRIUS trials.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of SES to reduce the risk of restenosis was initially demonstrated in short lesions using stent implantation with routine pre-dilatation and post-dilatation. This intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) substudy of the E-SIRIUS trial sought to evaluate local arterial responses to sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) delivered with a stent implantation technique allowing direct stenting and only selectively applying high-pressure post-dilatation. METHODS AND RESULTS: IVUS was performed immediately after intervention and at 8-month follow-up in 51 patients randomised to either bare-metal stents (BMS; Bx-Velocitytrade mark; N=20) or SES (Cyphertrade mark N=31). Direct stenting was allowed (24%) and post-dilation was performed only selectively (32%). Lumen dimensions, intimal hyperplasia and vessel remodeling were compared between SES and BMS. Subsequently, results of SES in the E-SIRIUS IVUS substudy (N=31) were compared to those of SES in the IVUS substudy of the SIRIUS trial (N=137). SES in SIRIUS IVUS substudy were delivered with 100% pre-dilatation and 77% post-dilatation. Baseline stent and reference segment measurements were similar between BMS and SES in E-SIRIUS IVUS patients. Using SES there was a 96% reduction in intimal hyperplasia volume within the stented segment (1.8+/-4.9 vs 50.6+/-39.7 mm3, P<0.001) and a significantly larger minimal lumen cross sectional area at 8-month follow-up (4.5+/-1.1 vs 2.3+/-0.9 mm2, P<0.001). No vessel remodeling was observed with the use of SES. The applied stent implantation technique resulted in a minimal stent/reference vessel area ratio of 0.75+/-0.17 in E-SIRIUS SES as compared to 0.84+/-0.23 in SIRIUS SES (P=0.046). Mean intimal hyperplasia cross-sectional area at follow-up was 0.1+/-0.2 mm2 in the SES group of E-SIRIUS and 0.5+/-0.8 mm2 in the SES group of SIRIUS (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: An implantation technique of SES which includes direct stenting and minimizes the use of high-pressure post-dilatation results in less optimal stent expansion. However, follow-up results compare very favourable to those of BMS and are characterised by even less intimal hyperplasia than after a more forceful implantation of SES.     

Differences in restenosis propensity of devices for transluminal coronary intervention: A quantitative angiographic comparison of balloon angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stent implantation and excimer laser angioplasty

With the increasing clinical application of new devices forpercutaneous coronary revascularization, maximization of theacute angiographic result has become widely recognized as akey factor in maintained clinical and angiographic success.What is unclear, however, is whether the specific mode of actionof different devices might exert an additional independent effecton late luminal renarrowing. The purpose of this study was toinvestigate such a difference in the degree of provocation ofluminal renarrowing (or ‘restenosis propensity’)by different devices, among 3660 patients, who had 4342 lesionssuccessfully treated by balloon angioplasty (n=3797), directionalcoronary atherectomy (n= 200), Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation(n= 229) or excimer laser coronary angioplasty (n= 116) andwho also underwent quantitative angiographic analysis pre- andpost-intervention and at 6-month follow-up. To allow valid comparisonsbetween the groups, because of significant differences in coronaryvessel size (balloon angioplasty=2.62±0.55 mm, directionalcoronary atherectomy= 3.28±0.62 mm, excimer laser coronaryangioplasty= 2.51±0.47 mm, Palmaz-Schatz=3.01±0.44mm;P<0.0001), the comparative measurements of interest selectedwere the ‘relative loss’ in luminal diameter (RLoss=losslvessel size) to denote the restenosis process, and the‘relative lumen at follow-up’ (RLfup=minimal luminaldiameter at follow uplvessel size) to represent the angiographicoutcome. For consistency, lesion severity pre-intervention was representedby the ‘relative lumen pre’ (RLpre=minimal luminaldiameter prelvessel size) and the luminal increase at interventionwas measured as ‘relative gain’ (relative gain=gainl vessel size). Differences in restenosis propensity betweendevices was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis.Multivariate models were constructed to determine relative lossand relative lumen at follow-up, taking account of relativelumen pre-intervention, lesion location, relative gain, vesselsize and the device used. In addition, model-estimated relativeloss and relative lumen at follow-up at given relative lumenpre-intervention relative gain and vessel size, were comparedamong the four groups. Significant differences were detectedamong the groups both with respect to these estimates, as wellas in the degree of influence of progressively increasing relativegain, on the extent of renarrowing (relative loss) and angiographicoutcome (relative lumen at follow-up), particularly at higherlevels of luminal increase (relative gain). Specifically, lesionstreated by balloon angioplasty or Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation(the predominantly ‘dilating’ interventions) wereassociated with more favourable angiographic profiles than directionalatherectomy or excimer laser (the mainly ‘debulking’interventions). Significant effects of lesion severity and location,as well as the well known influence of luminal increase on bothluminal renarrowing and late angiographic outcome were alsonoted. These findings indicate that propensity to restenosis afterapparently successful intervention is influenced not only bythe degree of luminal enlargement achieved at intervention,but by the device used to achieve it. In view of the clinicalimplications of such findings, further evaluation in largerrandomized patient populations is warranted.     

A randomized placebo-controlled trial of fluvastatin for prevention of restenosis after successful coronary balloon angioplasty; final results of the fluvastatin angiographic restenosis (FLARE) trial.

BACKGROUND: The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors competitively inhibit biosynthesis of mevalonate, a precursor of non-sterol compounds involved in cell proliferation. Experimental evidence suggests that fluvastatin may, independent of any lipid lowering action, exert a greater direct inhibitory effect on proliferating vascular myocytes than other statins. The FLARE (Fluvastatin Angioplasty Restenosis) Trial was conceived to evaluate the ability of fluvastatin 40 mg twice daily to reduce restenosis after successful coronary balloon angioplasty (PTCA). METHODS: Patients were randomized to either placebo or fluvastatin 40 mg twice daily beginning 2-4 weeks prior to planned PTCA and continuing after a successful PTCA (without the use of a stent), to follow-up angiography at 26+/-2 weeks. Clinical follow-up was completed at 40 weeks. The primary end-point was angiographic restenosis, measured by quantitative coronary angiography at a core laboratory, as the loss in minimal luminal diameter during follow-up. Clinical end-points were death, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery or re-intervention, up to 40 weeks after PTCA. RESULTS: Of 1054 patients randomized, 526 were allocated to fluvastatin and 528 to placebo. Among these, 409 in the fluvastatin group and 427 in the placebo group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, having undergone a successful PTCA after a minimum of 2 weeks of pre-treatment. At the time of PTCA, fluvastatin had reduced LDL cholesterol by 37% and this was maintained at 33% at 26 weeks. There was no difference in the primary end-point between the treatment groups (fluvastatin 0.23+/-0.49 mm vs placebo 0.23+/-0.52 mm, P=0.95) or in the angiographic restenosis rate (fluvastatin 28%, placebo 31%, chi-square P=0.42), or in the incidence of the composite clinical end-point at 40 weeks (22.4% vs 23.3%; logrank P=0.74). However, a significantly lower incidence of total death and myocardial infarction was observed in six patients (1.4%) in the fluvastatin group and 17 (4.0%) in the placebo group (log rank P=0.025). CONCLUSION: Treatment with fluvastatin 80 mg daily did not affect the process of restenosis and is therefore not indicated for this purpose. However, the observed reduction in mortality and myocardial infarction 40 weeks after PTCA in the fluvastatin treated group has not been previously reported with statin therapy. Accordingly, a priori investigation of this finding is indicated and a new clinical trial with this intention is already underway.     

Successful rotational atherectomy in the setting of extensive coronary dissection: a case of failed balloon angioplasty in a nondilatable calcified lesion complicated by balloon rupture and extensive dissection.

We describe a case of rotational atherectomy (RA) used in the setting of extensive coronary dissection. Unsuccessful predilitation of a heavily calcified proximal LAD stenosis resulted in balloon rupture, which produced occlusive dissection extending into the mid LAD. Limited options for this patient required that we perform RA to permit stent delivery and deployment and avoid anterior myocardial infarction. A brief discussion of reasons for balloon angioplasty failure and the potential role for subsequent RA is given. Predictors for coronary perforation when performing RA are reviewed. Our rationale and strategy to avoid the increased risk of perforation with RA in this contraindicated setting of extensive dissection is given.     

Angiographic and clinical outcomes at 8 months of cutting balloon angioplasty and beta-brachytherapy for native vessel in-stent restenosis (BETACUT): results from a stopped randomized controlled trial.

The objective of this study was to assess angiographic and clinical outcomes of cutting balloon (CB) angioplasty and concomitant Sr/Y-90 beta-brachytherapy as a treatment modality for patients with native vessel in-stent restenosis (ISR). Procedural advantages over the standard balloon (SB) have been claimed for the CB. Intracoronary brachytherapy preceded by SB angioplasty is regarded as the treatment of choice in patients with ISR. In an interim analysis of a prospective randomized trial designed for 652 patients, 100 consecutive patients with ISR were assigned to treatment with SB angioplasty (n = 51) or CB angioplasty (n = 49), followed in either case by Sr/Y-90 beta-brachytherapy. Quantitative coronary angiography at baseline, postintervention, and at 8 months was performed by an independent central laboratory. More than 90% of target lesions in the overall patient population were diffuse, with 14% of stents totally occluded. Procedural parameters and immediate angiographic outcomes were essentially the same in either study arm. At 8 months, no statistically significant differences were observed in recurrent angiographic restenosis (SB = 26.1%; CB = 29.5%; P = 0.82), target lesion revascularizations (SB = 13.7%; CB = 8.2%; P = 0.53), and major adverse cardiac events (SB = 15.7%; CB = 8.2%; P = 0.36). In this interim analysis, there was no indication of a beneficial effect of CB use over SB use in terms of angiographic or clinical outcomes at 8-month follow-up. CB angioplasty appears to be as safe and efficacious as SB angioplasty in beta-radiation treatment of patients with predominantly diffuse native vessel ISR. It was decided to discontinue the trial.     

A randomized trial comparing phosphorylcholine-coated stenting with balloon angioplasty as well as abciximab with placebo for restenosis reduction in small coronary arteries

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this randomized trial was to assess the antirestenotic effects of phosphorylcholine (PC)-coated stents as well as of abciximab in small coronary arteries when compared with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and placebo respectively. BACKGROUND: Stent coating with PC has been shown to reduce protein absorption and platelet activation which may reduce the risk of restenosis. Furthermore, on the basis of nondedicated studies abciximab is believed to reduce the risk of restenosis after coronary interventions. METHODS: A total of 502 patients with lesions situated in small coronary arteries (vessel diameter /=50% diameter stenosis) at follow-up; death or myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (TVR), were assessed as secondary end-points. RESULTS: Angiographic restenosis did not differ between patients treated with PC-coated stents or with PTCA (39.0% vs. 34.2%; P = 0.30) and between patients receiving abciximab or placebo (39.3% vs. 34.3%; P = 0.29). Similarly, the need for TVR at 1-year follow-up did not differ between patients receiving PC-coated stents or PTCA (20.2% vs. 20.5%; P = 0.98) as well as between patients treated with abciximab or placebo (18.7% vs. 21.9%; P = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: PC-coated stents and abciximab failed to reduce the incidence of angiographic restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention of small coronary arteries. These data strengthen the belief that future studies on prevention of restenosis in small coronary arteries should focus on drug-eluting stents.     

Stepwise intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance of high-pressure coronary stenting does not result in an improved acute or long-term outcome: A randomized comparison to “final-look” IVUS assessment

The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential benefit of stepwise intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided coronary stent deployment compared to angiographic stent implantation with final IVUS assessment only. Acute procedural success and 6-month angiographic follow-up were compared in both groups. Intravascular ultrasound was performed using a 20- or 30-MHz mechanically rotated catheter in 85 patients who were prospectively randomized to group A (n = 42; IVUS-guided) and group B (n = 43; angiography + final IVUS assessment). There was no difference in the number of stents implanted (1.5 ± 0.9 stents/lesion in group A and 1.3 ± 0.6 stents/lesion in group B), the duration of the procedure, or the amount of contrast medium used. Defined criteria of optimal stent deployment (stent apposition, stent symmetry, complete coverage of dissections, >90% in-stent lumen area/reference lumen area) were achieved in 54.2% in group A and 56.6% in group B (NS). Angiographic follow-up was 87.1% at 6 ± 2 months, and clinical follow-up was 100% at 8 ± 1 months. There was no significant difference in restenosis rate (33.3% vs. 34.9%) applying a binary >50% diameter stenosis criterion for both groups. There was no significant difference in minimal in-stent lumen area at both baseline (7.91 ± 2.64 mm² vs. 7.76 ± 2.21 mm²) and follow-up (5.84 ± 2 mm² vs. 5.52 ± 1.87 mm²). With regard to immediate procedural lumen gain and rate of restenosis, multiple IVUS examinations during the procedure showed no advantage compared to final IVUS assessment only. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 46:135–141, 1999. © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.