无张力疝修补术与传统疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效比较

目的比较无张力疝修补术与传统修补术治疗腹股沟疝的效果。方法将200例腹股沟疝患者随机分成观察组（n=110）与对照组（n=90）,观察组采用无张力疝修补术,对照组采用传统疝修补术,比较2组术后疼痛、一般情况及并发症。结果观察组患者平均手术时间、下床活动时间和住院时间均明显短于对照组（均P〈0.05）;对照组术后疼痛要强于观察组（P〈0.05）;观察组并发症发生率、复发率均显著低于对照组（均P〈0.05）。结论无张力疝修补术操作简便、迅捷、安全,住院时间短,术后并发症低。     

腹腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的临床应用价值

目的 研究腹腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)在临床应用中的价值.方法 回顾性分析32例TAPP和56例开放式无张力疝修补成人腹股沟疝病人资料,并对手术后1～36个月的病人进行电话随访.分析指标:手术时间、镇痛剂使用频次、术后住院天数、内脏血管损伤、阴囊气肿、阴囊水肿、切口感染、有无复发、住院费用.结果 镇痛荆使用频次、阴囊水肿发生率、术后住院天数,TAPP优于无张力疝修补术,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);手术时间、住院费用,TAPP不如无张力疝修补术,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);阴囊气肿是腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术所特有;两组均无内脏血管损伤、切口感染、疝复发发生.结论 TAPP是一种安全、有效的无张力疝修补方法.比较开放式无张力疝修补术,TAPP具有创伤小、疼痛轻、恢复快等优势,但也存在费用高等缺点.对于复发疝和双侧疝,可优先考虑腹腔镜疝修补.     

腹腔镜疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床比较

目的:比较腹腔镜疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的效果.方法:回顾性分析122例成人腹股沟疝手术的临床资料,其中54例行腹腔镜疝修补术,68例行开放式无张力疝修补术;比较两种术式手术时间、患者住院时间、术后并发症、住院费用及术后复发率.结果:腹腔镜组患者的住院时间和术后疼痛时间分别为(3.2±1.2)d和(0.9±0.4)d,显著短于开放组的(6.2±1.8)d和(2.1±0.7)d(P＜0.05),但是住院费用腹腔镜组为(7 603±511)元,高于开放组的(4 667±280)元(P＜0.05),两组的手术时间、术后并发症及术后复发率差异无显著性(P＞0.05).结论:腹腔镜与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝各有优势,可根据患者的个体差异选择合适的治疗方式.     

成人腹腔镜疝修补术与无张力疝修补术的临床疗效比较

目的：比较成人腹腔镜疝修补术和无张力式疝修补术的临床疗效。方法选择2011年10月至2012年11月许昌市中心医院收治的行疝修补术患者60例,采用腹腔镜疝修补术的30例患者为观察组,采用无张力疝修补术的30例患者为对照组,比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量和术后并发症的发生情况。结果两组手术时间、住院时间、术后并发症的发生率及复发率相比,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;术后观察组有1例患者发生并发症,对照组4例,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论治疗成人腹股沟疝,腹腔镜疝修补术较无张力疝修补术有更好的临床疗效,具有创伤小、疼痛轻、康复快等优点,值得在临床上推广应用。     

腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前疝修补术与疝环充填式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效比较

目的探讨腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)与疝环充填式无张力疝修补术(Mesh-Plug)在腹股沟疝治疗中的应用及临床疗效比较。方法选取采用TAPP和Mesh-Plug治疗的77例成年腹股沟疝患者的临床病历资料。根据手术方式不同分为TAPP组(37例)和Mesh-Plug组(40例),其中TAPP组采用腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前疝修补术手术治疗,Mesh-Plug组采用开放式疝环充填式无张力疝修补术手术治疗,观察对比两组患者临床治疗效果及在手术时间、住院时间、住院费用、术后并发症(血肿、疼痛等)、近中期复发率等方面的差异。结果两组患者均获得临床治愈;Mesh-Plug组平均手术时间为(50.25±11.36)min,TAPP组平均手术时间为(48.68±10.23)min;Mesh-Plug组平均住院时间为(10.69±2.36)d,TAPP组平均住院时间为(7.61±2.11)d;Mesh-Plug组出现围术期并发症7例,TAPP组为1例;两组间在手术时间方面差异无统计学意义(P0.05);在平均住院日、围手术期并发症等组间比较均差异有统计学意义(P0.05);住院费用:TAPP组为(1.25±0.24)万元,Mesh-Plug组为(0.84±0.22)万元,TAPP组费用高于开放组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。术后随访3~24个月,TAPP组复发0例,Mesh-Plug组复发1例,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 TAPP和Mesh-Plug在治疗成年腹股沟疝中均具有良好治疗效果,但TAPP较Mesh-Plug具有住院时间短、恢复快、围术期并发症低、慢性疼痛不适感轻等方面的优势,因而在临床应用中更具优势。     

腹腔镜经腹膜前疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的效果比较

目的:比较腹腔镜经腹膜前疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床效果。方法:选取2014年5月~2016年5月我院收治的行手术治疗的腹股沟疝患者114例,随机分为开放组和腹腔镜组各57例。开放组行开放式无张力疝修补术,腹腔镜组行腹腔镜经腹膜前疝修补术,比较两组患者手术情况、住院时间、术后并发症发生率以及随访12个月患者复发情况。结果:除手术时间外,腹腔镜组术中出血量、术后疼痛持续时间、住院时间及术后并发症发生率均低于开放组(P<0.05);两组均未出现复发情况,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:腹腔镜经腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的术中出血量、术后疼痛持续时间、住院时间及并发症发生率均优于开放式无张力疝修补术,值得临床推广应用。     

传统的疝修补术、无张力疝修补术、腹腔镜疝修补术临床疗效对照研究

目的探讨3种不同的疝修补术在腹股沟斜疝治疗中的应用价值。方法分别采用传统的疝修补术、无张力疝修补术、腹腔镜疝修补术3种方法治疗成人腹股沟疝,并比较3组的临床指标。结果腹腔镜疝修补术组耗时最长达(62.5±14.8)min,其住院费用达(7944.±8656.7)元,均显著高于其他两组(P<0.05),但腹腔镜组术后切口感染率为0%,切口血肿/阴囊血肿发生率仅为6.3%,较其他两组显著降低(P<0.05)。无张力疝修补术及腹腔镜疝修补术组术后无1例复发。无张力疝修补术及腹腔镜疝修补术组患者WBC,FH,C-RP,α1-AT均显著高于手术前。结论 3种术式中腹腔镜疝修补术具有微创、并发症少等优点,无张力疝修补术具有较高的性价比,两种术式均未增加伤口感染发生率。     

充填式无张力疝修补术临床分析

目的 总结充填式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的效果.方法 将济源市肿瘤医院收治的70例腹股沟疝患者随机分为治疗组与对照组,两组各45例,治疗组采取无张力疝修补术进行治疗,对照组采取Bassini修补术进行治疗,观察两组患者的治疗效果.结果 治疗组患者手术时间、术后恢复情况、并发症及复发率均明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）.结论 采取充填式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝具有创伤小、术后恢复快、并发症少及低复发率等优点.     

腹腔镜疝修补术与无张力疝修补术的疗效比较

探讨腹腔镜疝修补术与无张力疝修补术的疗效。选取收治的110例腹股沟疝患者,随机分为治疗组和对照组,治疗组采用腹腔镜疝修补术治疗,对照组采用无张力疝修补术治疗,对比观察两组手术时间、住院时间、术后疼痛发生率、并发症发生率及临床疗效。治疗组住院时间低于对照组,但治疗组的手术时间和手术费用都明显高于对照组,两组三项手术指标对比有显著性差异,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。腹腔镜疝修补术能够明显缩短手术时间,提高手术成功率,减少术后并发症,值得在临床上推广应用。     

腹腔镜疝修补术与张力疝修补术创伤程度的对比研究

目的比较腹腔镜疝修补术和开放无张力疝修补术对机体创伤的大小.方法随机选择20例腹腔镜疝修补术病人和开放无张力疝修补术病人18例进行前瞻性研究,比较两种术式围术期的白介素-6(inter-leukin-6,IL-6)、C-反应蛋白(C-reactive protein,CRP)、皮质醇(cortisol,CORT)和白细胞计数的变化.结果腹腔组病人术后的IL-6,CRP及白细胞计数的变化较开放组大.两组皮质醇变化无统计学意义.结论腔镜组的应激反应程度大于开放组,创伤大于开放组.     

腹腔镜下两种腹股沟疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝临床疗效分析

目的探讨腹腔镜下两种腹股沟疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的有效性及安全性。方法回顾性分析2010年3月至2012年8月施行腹腔镜下完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术(TEP)的38例成人腹股沟疝患者的临床资料,并与同期施行经腹腔镜腹膜前修补术(TAPP)进行比较分析。结果两组患者住院时间、住院费用、术后下床时间及并发症的发病率均无显著差异(P>0.05);但是手术时间TAPP组长于TEP组,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);TAPP组术后复发2例,TEP组无复发。结论 TAPP和TEP均是治疗成人腹股沟疝的有效方法,但TEP手术时间短,安全性更高,值得临床推广应用。     

Simultaneous mesh repair of bilateral groin hernia: A comparison of laparoscopic and open techniques

Summary

The optimal management of bilateral groin hernia remains contentious. We report a prospective study of all patients undergoing simultaneous mesh repair of bilateral groin hernia during a 1 year period at a single institution. Cases managed by open surgery were compared with those undergoing laparoscopic repair; duration of hospital stay and complication rate were the main end-points. 51 patients were studied; 18 had open surgery and 33 had a laparoscopic procedure. The patients in the laparoscopic group had a shorter hospital stay (median saving of 2.5 nights). Postoperative complications (predominantly haematoma, infection and urinary retention) were more common in the open surgery group (p < 0.01). There were no recurrences over the study period. In summary, laparoscopic repair was associated with a shorter hospital stay and lower postoperative complication rate when compared with conventional open surgery. We would commend this procedure as the operation of choice for the management of bilateral groin hernia.     

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for strangulated inguinal hernia

Introduction

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) is widely accepted in elective inguinal hernioplasty. However, given the scarcity of data, the feasibility and safety of TAPP in strangulated hernia cases have not yet been determined.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the data from a consecutive series of 33 patients who had undergone surgery for acute strangulated inguinal hernia associated with suspected visceral ischemic damage by either TAPP (TAPP group, n = 11) or conventional open hernioplasty via the anterior approach (anterior group, n = 22).

Results

The TAPP group had a significant longer surgical duration than the anterior group (147 vs 84 min) and relatively less blood loss. Incision and enlargement of the hernial orifice, which enables easy reduction of the strangulated organ, was performed in the last 7 of 11 cases in the TAPP group. The morbidity was lower in the TAPP group, but the difference was not statistically significant (18% vs 23%). The TAPP group had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay than the anterior group (7 vs 10 days).

Conclusion

For surgeons with sufficient knowledge of the anatomy and expertise in reducing the strangulated organ, TAPP for strangulated inguinal hernia is at least comparable to open hernioplasty via the anterior approach in short‐term outcomes.     

腹腔镜与开放手术行无张力疝修补术的对比研究

目的比较研究腹腔镜与开放手术在疝修补术中的临床疗效。方法回顾分析60例腹腔镜疝修补术与90例开放手术的临床资料。结果平均手术时间、并发症发生率和住院费用比较，两组比较差异无显著性（P〉0．05）；平均出血量、止痛药应用比例和住院时间比较，腹腔镜组与开放组比较差异有显著性（P〈0．05）。结论腹腔镜疝修补手术具有创伤小、康复快、美容等优点，疗效较开放手术好，是腹股沟疝无张力修补术的最佳术式。     

Post-operative rehabilitation following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Summary

In a pilot study, 100 patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and 20 patients undergoing open inguinal hernia repair have been compared. The time taken to regain full mobility following laparoscopic repair was 2.3 ± 0.1 d (mean ± SE) compared with 7.2 ± 0.9 d after open repair (P < 0.003). Following laparoscopic repair patients returned to work after 7.6 ± 0.6d compared with 21.2 ± 1.5d after open repair (P < 0.0001). Hospital stay was shorter following laparoscopic hernia repair. Operating time was longer in the laparoscopic group (64 ± 3.0 min, [mean ± SE]) compared with the open group (24 ± 1.2 min, P > 0.0001) but diminished with increasing experience. Studies of the patients' subjective experience of pain failed to show a significant difference post-operatively, both groups of patients claiming low pain scores.     

腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补对中青年男性腹股沟疝疗效的影响

目的探讨腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)对中青年男性腹股沟疝患者性功能的影响。方法纳入于2014年1月-2016年2月接受TEP的腹股沟疝患者147例为观察组,纳入同期接受腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)的腹股沟疝患者133例为对照组,开展回顾性分析。对比两组手术效果、性功能的变化。结果观察组手术时间、住院时间、术后疼痛时间明显短于对照组,住院费用少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组术后精液α-葡萄糖苷酶(α-Glu)、果糖(Fru)和酸性磷酸酶(ACP)水平均明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组术后均出现少量并发症,经对症处理后均痊愈,两组并发症发生率及复发率对比,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论相较于腹腔镜TAPP,对腹股沟疝患者采用腹腔镜TEP术式可以进一步缩短手术时间及术后恢复时间,且不增加并发症及复发率,同时还有助于促进患者精液质量的恢复,值得关注。     

腹腔镜TAPP术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的临床效果

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)治疗复发性腹股沟疝的临床效果。方法回顾性分析我院2011年9月至2016年2月行TAPP治疗的腹股沟疝162例患者的临床资料,根据腹股沟疝情况将患者分为原发疝组(142例)与复发疝组(20例)。所有患者在全身麻醉下行腹腔镜TAPP治疗。比较两组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、术后并发症发生情况以及复发情况。结果原发疝组的手术时间短于复发疝组(P<0.05);两组的术中出血量及术后住院时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组的术后近、远期并发症总发生率及复发率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜TAPP治疗复发性腹股沟疝可避开前次手术的解剖异常及粘连,疗效可靠,且不增加术后并发症发生率和复发率。     

两种无张力疝修补术在治疗成人腹股沟斜疝中的对比

目的 比较开放式无张力疝修补术与腹腔镜疝修补术在治疗成人斜疝中的疗效差异。方法 回顾性分析和比较1999年1月～2004年7月，完成的两种不同无张力成人斜疝修补术172例（A组：开放式无张力修补术90例，B组：腹腔镜无张力修补术82例）的手术并发症、术后恢复情况、费用及复发率等。结果 两种术式复发率差异无显著性，B组术后恢复快于A组，手术并发症B组少于A组，费用B组高于A组。结论 两种疝修补术在治疗成人斜疝中均疗效确切，复发率低；腹腔镜疝修补术虽有很多优点，并可作为双侧疝、复发疝、滑动性疝、下腹部有手术疤痕等疝患者的首选，但还不能完全取代开放式无张力疝修补术，选用何种手术方式应个体化。     

Single-incision transabdominal preperitoneal and totally extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia: early experience from a single center in Asia

Introduction: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is currently one of the most commonly performed minimally invasive surgical procedures. In recent years, single‐incision operations have been developed to further reduce the invasiveness of the surgery. Herein, we report our early experience with single‐incision laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in Asia, with both the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approaches. Methods: This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on a cohort of consecutive patients with inguinal hernia who underwent single‐incision laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in a minimal access surgical center in Hong Kong between January 2010 and January 2011. Results: Our cohort consists of 15 patients who underwent single‐incision laparoscopic inguinal hernia; 13 were unilateral and two were bilateral hernias. The mean age was 59.8 years old (range, 28–74 years). The overall mean operative time was 59.53 min (range, 25–120 min). For unilateral hernia repair, the mean operative time was 56 min (range, 25–75 min) and 48.5 min (range, 41–55 min) for TAPP and TEP, respectively. In all cases single‐incision laparoscopic hernia repair was successfully performed, no additional trocars were required, and there were no conversions to conventional laparoscopic or open inguinal hernia repair. All patients were discharged on the same day as the procedure. Conclusion: Single‐incision laparoscopic inguinal hernia is feasible in both TEP and TAPP approaches. The procedure should be performed by laparoscopic surgeons with a high level of experience in single‐incision surgery. Further randomized trials should be performed to evaluate the full potential and clinical application of single‐incision TAPP and TEP.     

腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的效果及安全性

目的 探讨腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的效果及安全性。方法 回顾性选取2018年1月至2021年1月本院收治的72例复发性腹股沟疝患者,依据手术方法将其分为对照组（疝环充填式无张力疝修补术）和研究组（腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术）,每组36例。比较两组的手术相关指标、疼痛程度、应激反应指标及术后并发症发生情况。结果 研究组的术中出血量少于对照组,首次下床时间、疼痛持续时间及住院时间均短于对照组（P<0.05）。术后1、3 d及1周,研究组的SF-MPQ评分均低于对照组（P<0.05）。手术后,两组的β-EP、Cor、CRP水平均较手术前明显升高,但研究组低于对照组（P<0.05）。研究组的术后并发症总发生率为5.56%,低于对照组的25.00%(P<0.05)。结论 与疝环充填式无张力疝修补术相比,采用腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝可减轻疼痛程度及应激反应,促进患者恢复,安全性更高。