Recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation with unpurged and purged marrow in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

The toxicity of autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) is correlated to neutropenia. Although recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhu GM-CSF) seems to hold promise in accelerating neutrophil recovery, few analyses from randomized studies are presently available. Ninety-one patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving high-dose ablative chemotherapy followed by ABMT with unpurged or purged marrow were included in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Forty-four patients received 250 micrograms rhu GM-CSF (Escherichia coli)/m2 and 47 patients received placebo. Treatment was administered daily as continuous infusion from day of ABMT until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) reached 0.5 x 10(9)/L for 7 days or until day 30, whichever was first. With rhu GM-CSF, 50% of the patients reached an ANC count greater than 0.5 x 10(9)/L at day 14 as opposed to day 21 with placebo (P less than .0001). Patients transplanted with marrow purged by mafosfamide also recovered earlier when treated with rhu GM-CSF (16 v 20.5 days, P = .013). The hospitalization duration was shorter in the rhu GM-CSF group (median, 23 v 28 days, P less than .05). No difference was observed in fever, number of infections, and antibiotic administration between the two groups. The major adverse event ascribed to rhu GM-CSF was a capillary leak syndrome in three patients graded as severe in two patients, moderate in one, and reversible in all three patients. In addition, one patient in the rhu GM-CSF group died suddenly with no explanation. In long term follow-up, the relapse rate was identical in both groups and there was no significant difference in the number of deaths at 1 year (12 with rhu GM-CSF v 9 with placebo), although deaths seemed to occur slightly earlier in the rhu GM-CSF group. We conclude that after ABMT with purged or unpurged marrow, rhu GM-CSF (E coli) significantly reduces neutropenia duration and hospitalization stay. A positive causative relation between the study drug and/or its mode of application with an increased toxicity as compared with GM-CSF from other sources and/or other modes of application cannot be deduced from the experiences in this study. Additional randomized trials would be necessary for an appropriate answer.     

The effect of macrophage colony-stimulating factor on haemopoietic recovery after autologous bone marrow transplantation

Macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) is active in the late stages of monocyte maturation, activates mature monocyte-macrophages and enhances their production of various other cytokines. We have examined the effects of a 21 d course of escalating doses of M-CSF purified from human urine (hM-CSF) on recovery following autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) in 20 patients with malignant lymphomas. Four patients were treated at each dose level of 4, 8, 16, 32 and 64 x 10(6) U/m2/d and results compared to 46 concurrent controls. There was no significant difference in recovery to an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of 0.5 x 10(9)/l (median 20 d in hM-CSF group versus 22 in controls) or in recovery of platelets to 50 x 10(9)/l (32 d versus 39 d, 0.05 less than P less than 0.1); hM-CSF patients received a median of 81 platelet units following ABMT (controls 112 units, P = NS). hM-CSF patients had a median of 5.5 d with fever greater than 37.5 degrees C (control 8, P = NS), received parenteral antibiotics for 14.5 d (control 17, P = NS) and had a 50% incidence of bacteraemia (control 48%). hM-CSF treated patients were discharged by a median of day 29 following transplantation (control 33, P less than 0.05). Platelet and neutrophil recovery correlated significantly with the number of marrow mononuclear cells (MNC) reinfused in the hM-CSF group (P = 0.05 and P = 0.014 respectively) but not in controls. Subgroup analysis showed that hM-CSF patients receiving greater than 2 x 10(8) MNC/kg body weight reached an ANC of 0.5 x 10(9)/l by a median of day 16.5 (control 18.5, NS), became platelet transfusion independent by day 17 (control 29, P less than 0.05) and reached a platelet count of 50 x 10(9)/l by day 21 (control 40, P less than 0.05). No significant toxicity attributable to hM-CSF treatment was seen. These results suggest that hM-CSF accelerates platelet recovery following ABMT and that relatively large marrow innocula are required to see this effect.     

Use of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with lymphoid malignancies transplanted with unpurged or adjusted-dose mafosfamide-purged autologous marrow.

The neutropenia-related morbidity and mortality occurring after autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) is increased by marrow purging procedures. While phase I through III clinical trials showed the enhancing activity of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) on neutrophil recovery after ABMT with unpurged marrow, controversial results have been reported when purged marrow was used. Therefore, it was the aim of the present study to evaluate the efficacy of rhGM-CSF administration in a group of patients (n = 15) with lymphoid malignancies transplanted in complete remission with mafosfamide-purged (n = 10) or unpurged (n = 5) marrow. Mafosfamide concentrations used for marrow purging were evaluated on an individual basis by means of a recently described technique that destroys the granulocyte-macrophage (granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units [CFU-GM]) compartment, but spares 50% of the more primitive stroma adherent colony-forming cells (CFU-Blast). rhGM-CSF (10 micrograms/kg/d) was started within 24 hours of ABMT and administered in a 4-hour infusion daily until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) reached 500 x 10(6)/L and then for 7 more days. Patients receiving mafosfamide-purged or unpurged marrow failed to show any difference in terms of median number of days required to achieve an ANC > or = 500 x 10(6) (13 v 14.0, P > .4) cells/L. As compared with retrospective controls, granulocytic recovery was reduced by a median time of 11 (P < or = .0005) and 5 (P < or = .0005) days for patients grafted with purged and unpurged marrow, respectively. The number of CFU-GM (mean +/- SD) infused per kilogram of body weight was significantly lower in patients who received purged autografts as compared with those receiving unpurged autografts (0.85 +/- 0.79 x 10(4) v 15.7 +/- 9.2 x 10(4), P < or = .0005). The dose of CFU-GM progenitors infused per kilogram of body weight did not correlate (r = .031, P > .05) with the time required to reach an ANC > or = 500 x 10(6) cells/L. The number of CFU-Blast (mean +/- SD) infused per kilogram of body weight was not significantly different between patients who received purged or unpurged autografts (5.05 +/- 2.51 x 10(3)/kg v 6.18 +/- 2.66 x 10(3)/kg, P < or = .375). A statistically significant correlation (r = -.658, P < or = .05) was observed between the number of CFU-Blast infused and the number of days required to reach an ANC > or = 500 x 10(6) cells/L.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Hematopoietic growth factors for graft failure after bone marrow transplantation: a randomized trial of granulocyte-macrophage colony- stimulating factor (GM-CSF) versus sequential GM-CSF plus granulocyte- CSF

Delay in hematologic recovery after bone marrow transplantation (BMT) can extend and amplify the risks of infection and hemorrhage, compromise patients' survival, and increase the duration and cost of hospitalization. Because current studies suggest that granulocyte- macrophage (GM) colony-stimulating factor (CSF) may potentiate the sensitivity of hematopoietic progenitor cells to G-CSF, we performed a prospective, randomized trial comparing GM-CSF (250 micrograms/m2/d x 14 days) versus sequential GM-CSF x 7 days followed by G-CSF (5 micrograms/kg/d x 7 days) as treatment for primary or secondary graft failure after BMT. Eligibility criteria included failure to achieve a white blood cell (WBC) count > or = 100/microL by day +21 or > or = 300/microL by day +28, no absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > or = 200/microL by day +28, or secondary sustained neutropenia after initial engraftment. Forty-seven patients were enrolled: 23 received GM-CSF (10 unrelated, 8 related allogeneic, and 5 autologous), and 24 received GM- CSF followed by G-CSF (12 unrelated, 7 related allogeneic, and 5 autologous). For patients receiving GM-CSF alone, neutrophil recovery (ANC > or = 500/microL) occurred between 2 and 61 days (median, 8 days) after therapy, while those receiving GM-CSF+G-CSF recovered at a similar rate of 1 to 36 days (median, 6 days; P = .39). Recovery to red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence was slow, occurring 6 to 250 days (median, 35 days) after enrollment with no significant difference between the two treatment groups (GM-CSF: median, 30 days; GM-CSF+G- CSF; median, 42 days; P = .24). Similarly, platelet transfusion independence was delayed until 4 to 249 days (median, 32 days) after enrollment, with no difference between the two treatment groups (GM- CSF: median, 28 days; GM-CSF+G-CSF: median, 42 days; P = .38). Recovery times were not different between patients with unrelated donors and those with related donors or autologous transplant recipients. Survival at 100 days after enrollment was superior after treatment with GM-CSF alone. Only 1 of 23 patients treated with GM-CSF died versus 7 of 24 treated with GM-CSF+G-CSF who died 16 to 84 days (median, 38 days) after enrollment, yielding Kaplan-Meier 100-day survival estimates of 96% +/- 8% for GM-CSF versus 71% +/- 18% for GM-CSF+G-CSF (P = .026). These data suggest that sequential growth factor therapy with GM-CSF followed by G-CSF offers no advantage over GM-CSF alone in accelerating trilineage hematopoiesis or preventing lethal complications in patients with poor graft function after BMT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Low-dose lenograstim is as effective as standard dose in shortening neutrophil engraftment time following myeloablative chemotherapy and peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is widely used following myeloablative chemotherapy (high-dose therapy; HDT) and peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue (PBPCR) to reduce neutrophil engraftment time. The dose and duration required to gain maximum clinical and economic benefit has not been fully investigated. This double blind placebo-controlled randomised trial was performed to determine whether short course low-dose or standard-dose Lenograstim (L) would influence recovery of haematopoiesis following HDT and PBPCR. Sixty-one patients were randomised between May 1999 and November 2004, to receive standard-dose lenograstim (263 microg/d), low-dose lenograstim (105 microg/d) or placebo injections. These commenced on day +5 following PBPCR and continued until neutrophil engraftment [absolute neutrophil count (ANC)] > or = 0.5 x 10(9)/l. Patients received standard supportive care until haemopoietic recovery. Both standard- and low-dose lenograstim resulted in a significantly shorter median time to neutrophil recovery (ANC > or = 0.1 x 10(9)/l:10.0 vs. 11.0 d, P = 0.025; ANC > or = 0.5 x 10(9)/l:11.0 vs. 14.0 d, P = 0.0002) compared with placebo. There was no significant difference in blood product support, antibiotic usage, documented infection, overall survival or relapse-free survival between the groups. Short course low-dose lenograstim is as effective as standard-dose in reducing neutrophil engraftment time following HDT and PBPCR.     

Lenograstim after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: results of a double-blind, randomized trial

A phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center trial was conducted in order to compare the incidence of microbiologically defined infections occurring after high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) and ASCT in 98 patients given lenograstim (Granocyte) and 94 patients given placebo after transplantation. Hematopoietic recovery, the use of i.v. antibiotics, the numbers of red blood cell and platelet transfusions, the days spent in hospital, and the days on parenteral nutrition were also compared. The incidence of infections until neutrophil recovery was significantly less in patients who received lenograstim after HDT and ASCT as compared to patients who received placebo (66 of 98 vs 86 of 94 patients, P<0.001). Lenograstim also significantly reduced the use of i.v. antibiotics (P<0.001) and the median duration of i.v. antibiotic treatment (8 days vs 10 days, P=0.04), improved neutrophil recovery (absolute neutrophil count >0.5 x 10(9)/l: 11 days vs 15 days, P<0.001) and reduced the number of days spent in hospital (15 days vs 17 days, P<0.001). The administration of lenograstim after HDT and ASCT significantly reduces the incidence of microbiologically defined infections until neutrophil recovery. It also leads to less use of antibiotics and earlier discharge from hospital.     

Fludarabine-containing regimens severely impair peripheral blood stem cells mobilization and collection in acute myeloid leukaemia patients

We studied the effects of an intensified induction/consolidation treatment containing fludarabine (ICE/FLAN/FLAN) on the mobilization and collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in 31 consecutive untreated acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients. The complete remission (CR) rate was comparable to classic inductions (68% after ICE; 84% after ICE-FLAN I). To mobilize PBSC, 19 patients received 10 microg/kg/d of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) starting at day 13 after FLAN, 13 (69%) of whom were found to be nonmobilizers. When a second G-CSF administration was performed in 10/13 patients mobilization was either not achieved (8/10) or was considered insufficient (<1 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg) (2/10) and all 13 were subsequently submitted to bone marrow harvest. The harvest was considered adequate in 12/13 (92%) patients and autologous BMT (ABMT) has so far been performed in 10/12 cases with a mean of 8.6 x 108/kg nucleated reinfused cells. The median times to neutrophil and platelet recovery after ABMT did not significantly differ from those of two previous series of patients treated with ABMT without fludarabine-containing regimens. Adequate amounts of PBSC were obtained in 6/19 (31%) patients, who were then reinfused. Median times for platelet recovery were significantly longer than in a previous series of 26 AML cases reinfused with PBSC after treatment with the ICE-NOVIA induction/consolidation regimen (125 v 20 d to 20 x 109 plt/l, P < 0.02; 218 v 37 d to 50 x 109 plt/l, P < 0.02). In addition, times for platelet recovery after ICE/FLAN/FLAN were not significantly different from those in a previous group treated with ABMT performed after ICE/NOVIA,without fludarabine. We conclude that fludarabine-containing regimens severely impair mobilization and collection of PBSC in AML patients and seem unsuitable when PBSC autotransplantation is programmed.     

Addition of peripheral blood stem cells collected without mobilization techniques to transplanted autologous bone marrow did not hasten marrow recovery following myeloablative therapy.

A randomized prospective trial was conducted to determine if the addition of cryopreserved autologous peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) collected without mobilization techniques to autologous cryopreserved bone marrow for patients receiving an autologous bone marrow transplant (ABMT) affected the time to marrow function recovery. Thirty-five evaluable patients with various malignancies were studied. Sixteen received PBSC + ABMT and 19 received ABMT alone. The PBSC were collected with 4 h leukapheresis procedures on 3 consecutive days. No manipulations to increase the number of circulating stem cells were used during the collections. The median time to recover 0.5 x 10(9)/l circulating granulocytes was 20 days after transplantation in the ABMT group and 27 days in the PBSC + ABMT group (p = 0.12). The median time to recover 20 x 10(9)/l platelets was 22 days after transplantation in the ABMT group and more than 27 days in the PBSC + ABMT group (p = 0.29). The day of discharge from the hospital was earlier for the ABMT group (median 29 days) than the PBSC + ABMT group (median 35 days, p = 0.03). We did not find that the addition of non-mobilized PBSC to infused autologous marrow accelerates marrow recovery.     

Peripheral blood vs bone marrow as a source for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

In this randomized prospective study, we included 30 patients with different hematological diseases (acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome or severe aplastic anemia) to compare peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) (15 patients; mean age 23) and bone marrow (BM) (15 patients; mean age 21.8) as a source for allogeneic transplantation regarding the tempo of hematopoietic recovery and the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). In the BM group, the median nucleated cell count harvested was 1.3 x 10(10), while in the PBSC group, the aphereses contained a median of 4.4 x 10(6) CD34+/kg recipient weight. PBSC transplantation (PBSCT) was associated with faster hematopoietic reconstitution measured as absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >0.5 x 10(9)/l (log-rank P value <0.0018) and platelet count >25 x 10(9)/l (log-rank P value <0.0098). Seven patients (46.7%) in the BM group vs only one patient (6.7%) in the PBSC group developed acute GVHD (P = 0.013). Therefore, we conclude that PBSCT is associated with faster hematopoietic recovery and the incidence of acute GVHD does not exceed that seen with BMT.     

Improved haematopoietic recovery following transplantation with ex vivo-expanded mobilized blood cells

Infusions of ex vivo-expanded (EXE) mobilized blood cells have been explored to enhance haematopoietic recovery following high dose chemotherapy (HDT). However, prior studies have not consistently demonstrated improvements in trilineage haematopoietic recovery. Three cohorts of three patients with breast cancer received three cycles of repetitive HDT supported by either unmanipulated (UM) and/or EXE cells. Efficacy was assessed by an internal comparison of each patient's consecutive HDT cycles, and to 106 historical UM infusions. Twenty-one cycles were supported by EXE cells and six by UM cells alone. Infusions of EXE cells resulted in fewer days with an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <0.1 x 10(9)/l (median 2 vs. 4 d, P = 0.002) and 3 d faster ANC recovery to >0.1 x 10(9)/l (median 5 vs. 8 d, P = 0.0002). This resulted in a major reduction in the incidence of febrile neutropenia compared with UM cycles (0% vs. 83%; P = 0.008) and in 66% of historical UM cycles (P = 0.01) and a marked reduction in hospital re-admission. There were also fewer platelet transfusions required (43% vs. 100%; P = 0.009). We conclude that EXE cells enhance both neutrophil and platelet recovery and reduce febrile neutropenia, platelet transfusion and hospital re-admission.     

Interleukin 10-induced thrombocytopenia in normal healthy adult volunteers: evidence for decreased platelet production

Recombinant human interleukin 10 (rhuIL-10) inhibits the production of proinflammatory cytokines and has shown promise in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Clinical trials have been accompanied by a reversible decline in platelet counts. We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial in 12 healthy volunteers to investigate the aetiology of rhuIL-10-induced thrombocytopenia. Eight volunteers received 8 microg/kg/d of rhuIL-10 subcutaneously, while four subjects received a placebo alone for 10 d. A reversible decline in the platelet counts from a mean of 275 x 10(9)/l to 164 x 10(9)/l was observed in the IL-10-treated cohort (P = 0.012). A fall in the haemoglobin mean levels was also observed in the IL-10-treated cohort from 13.7 to 11.7 g/dl (P = 0.011). No significant change was observed in the bone marrow cellularity or myeloid/erythroid ratio or in the number of megakaryocytes per high-powered field (HPF). A fall was observed in the number of megakaryocyte colony-forming units (CFU-MKs) after the administration of IL-10 compared with those receiving the placebo (P = 0.068). No difference in the change in granulocyte-macrophage CFUs (CFU-GMs), mixed lineage CFUs (CFU-GEMMs) or erythroid burst-forming units (BFU-Es) was observed when comparing the IL-10- vs. placebo-treated groups (P > 0.465). Serum cytokine levels of thrombopoietin (TPO). IL-6 and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) were not decreased following IL-10 administration. In fact, both TPO and GM-CSF appeared to be slightly increased in the serum. All subjects underwent In111-labelled platelet survival studies with liver/spleen scans to assess splenic sequestration prior to and then on day 7 of treatment. A significant reduction in splenic sequestration of platelets (P =0.012) was observed in the IL-10-treated group, but not in the placebo-treated subjects.     

The effects of pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHuMGDF) on platelet recovery in breast cancer patients undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHuMGDF) administered after autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies were done. In the phase 1/2 study, 75 breast cancer patients underwent a bone marrow harvest and myeloablative STAMP V chemotherapy and were randomized to receive placebo or one of three doses of PEG-rHuMGDF. In the phase 3 study, 64 patients were randomized to receive placebo or the minimally effective dose of PEG-rHuMGDF. The study drug was administered daily starting on the day of bone marrow infusion until the platelet count was greater than or equal to 50 x 10(9)/L (without transfusion) or for a maximum of 28 days. All patients received 10 microg/kg/day filgrastim starting on day 2 until neutrophil count recovery. RESULTS: PEG-rHuMGDF appeared to be safe and well tolerated. No significant differences were noted in mortality or disease progression rates. Antibodies to MGDF were not observed. In the phase 1/2 study, the time to platelet recovery to greater than or equal to 20 x 10(9)/L and platelet transfusion requirements were significantly reduced for patients treated with PEG-rHuMGDF compared with placebo (p < 0.05). In the phase 3 study, no significant differences in the kinetics of early thrombopoiesis or platelet transfusions after ABMT were observed. CONCLUSIONS: PEG-rHuMGDF was not consistently efficacious in reducing the duration of severe thrombocytopenia. The maximum platelet counts for PEG-rHuMGDF-treated patients occurred a median of 2 weeks after the last dose of drug, suggesting that the biologic effects of this hematopoietic cytokine are delayed compared with other hematopoietic cytokines.     

How long after neutrophil recovery should myeloid growth factors be continued in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients?

Growth factors are routinely used after autotransplantation to accelerate hematopoietic recovery, and are continued until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) is >/=0.5 x 10(9)/l on 3 consecutive days. Since ANC often increases to very high levels with this strategy, we discontinued growth factor on the first day ANC reached 0.5 x 10(9)/l in 45 patients (Study Group), and compared their subsequent ANC to 108 historic controls who received growth factor longer. While ANC on the day after reaching 0.5 x 10(9)/l was comparable between groups, ANC on the third day was significantly higher in the Control Group (2.3 vs 4.9 x 10(9)/l; P=0.0003). When compared to the first day, ANC in the Study Group was higher by a median of 140% on the third day and by 450% in the Control Group (P=0.0002). A significantly higher proportion of patients experienced a decline in ANC after the first day in the Study Group. However, only one patient in the Study Group became neutropenic transiently and ANC recovered spontaneously the next day. The incidence of fever and hospitalization were comparable. We conclude that growth factors can be discontinued after autotransplantation the day the ANC reaches 0.5 x 10(9)/l, without compromising neutrophil recovery.     

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilized whole blood containing over 0.3 x 106/kg CD34+ cells is a sufficient graft in autologous transplantation for relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

The feasibility of unprocessed, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized whole blood (WB) as an alternative stem cell source for autologous stem cell transplantation was studied. Forty-seven relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients entered the study. After two or three ifosfamide, methotrexate and etoposide (IMVP) courses, 1 l of G-CSF-mobilized WB was collected and stored refrigerated for 72 h. Meanwhile, BAM conditioning was given: BCNU (carmustine) 300 mg/m(2), high-dose cytarabine 6000 mg/m(2) and melphalan 140 mg/m(2). Toxicity, haematological recovery and survival were assessed and compared with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) and bone marrow transplantation (BMT) reference groups. High-dose G-CSF (2 x 12 microg/kg/d) gave the best mobilization results. Haematological recovery was related to the WB CD34+ content. A CD34+ threshold of >or= 0.3 10(6)/kg, obtained in 90% of patients using high-dose G-CSF, correlated with adequate recovery: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 0.5 x 10(9)/l: median 12 d (range 9-19). Platelet recovery > 20 and > 50 x 10(9)/l was 19 (11-59) and 30 d (14 not reached) respectively. Overall survival of patients < 60 years was 57% at 4 years and event-free survival was 32%. Survival was comparable with PBSCT and BMT after BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan). Remarkably, haematological recovery after BAM + WB was rapid and comparable (ANC) or slightly prolonged (platelets) in comparison with BEAM + PBSCT, despite a 10-20 times lower CD34+ cell dose in the WB graft. In conclusion, transplantation of WB containing >or= 0.3 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells after BAM conditioning is a safe procedure, and offers a fully equivalent and less costly alternative for PBSC.     

A randomized study of erythropoietin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus placebo and G-CSF for patients with Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation

Anemia is a universal finding in patients undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Effective therapies to increase the number of autologous red blood cells could result in a lower morbidity and mortality associated with red blood cell transfusions. We examined whether the addition of erythropoietin (Epo) to intensive therapy supported by progenitor cell transplantation and granulocyte colony- stimulating factor (G-CSF) would result in a lower requirement for red blood cell transfusions. Thirty-five patients with lymphoma were randomized to receive Epo versus placebo. Epo (600 U/kg three times per week) or placebo was begun 3 weeks before administration of high-dose therapy. Epo was held during the week of the preparatory regimen, and restarted on the day after BMT. All patients also received G-CSF following BMT. No significant differences were noted between the two groups in terms of patient characteristics at pretreatment or post-BMT evaluation. There were no differences in the total number of red blood cell units transfused (median Epo: 8 v placebo: 6, P = .22) nor the number of platelet transfusions given (median Epo: 12 v placebo 5, P = .14). Engraftment of granulocytes (absolute neutrophil count > or = 500/microL) occurred in a median of 12 days (range, 9 to 33) for the patients receiving Epo and G-CSF, compared with a median of 10 days (range, 8 to 22) for those receiving placebo and G-CSF (P = .70). Likewise, there were no differences in the time to platelet count > or = 20,000/microL without further transfusions with a median of 22 days (range, 15 to 150+) for those receiving Epo and G-CSF compared with a median of 20 days (range, 11 to 54) for those patients receiving placebo and G-CSF (P = .28). The combination of G-CSF and Epo as administered in this study appears to be safe but does not result in an improvement in the total number of red blood cell transfusions or total number of single donor platelet units transfused.     

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHuMGDF) as an adjunct to chemotherapy for adults with de novo acute myeloid leukemia

To determine the safety, biologic, and clinical benefits of pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHuMGDF; Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA) after myelosuppressive chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 108 adult patients with de novo AML were randomized to receive either PEG-rHuMGDF (2.5 microg/kg/d or 5 microg/kg/d) for up to 21 doses (group A), a single dose of 2.5 microg/kg PEG-rHuMGDF, 7 daily doses of 2.5 microg/kg PEG-rHuMGDF (group B), or placebo. The greatest biologic activity was seen in group A with a median peak platelet count of 1,084 x 10(9)/L, occurring at a median 9 days after the last dose of study drug, compared with 517 x 10(9)/L and 390 x 10(9)/L in group B and placebo group, respectively. Thrombocytosis (platelets >1,000 x 10(9)/L) was seen at rates of 52%, 8%, and 9% in groups A, B, and placebo, respectively, but were not associated with any adverse event. There was no effect on median time to transfusion independent platelet recovery (> or = 20 x 10(9)/L). The median time to neutrophil recovery (> or = 500/microL) and red blood cell transfusion requirements were similar in all groups, and there was no apparent stimulation of leukemia. PEG-rHuMGDF was biologically active and well tolerated. Further investigation of dose and scheduling is required, specifically earlier dosing before and during chemotherapy.     

Use of physiological doses of human growth hormone in haematological patients receiving intensive chemotherapy promotes haematopoietic recovery: a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled study

In vivo and in vitro studies suggest human growth hormone (hGH) receptors on bone marrow stem cells may be biologically active and could be exploited to promote haemopoetic recovery after intensive chemotherapy. Patients with haematological malignancies receiving intensive chemotherapy and requiring hospitalization were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled single-centre trial. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either hGH 500 microg/day or placebo, for 6 weeks. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics at baseline between the placebo and treatment arms. Patients treated with hGH showed significantly faster recovery of platelets to 25 x 10(9)/l (median of 16 versus 19 days; P = 0.03) compared to the placebo-controlled arm (hazard ratio 1.47 favouring hGH, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-2.08). Time to relapse did not differ significantly between arms. There was no change in the anthropometric parameters at the start and end of hGH/placebo therapy. The study drug was well tolerated. Treatment with hGH in physiological doses improves platelet recovery, but is not associated with a lower relapse rate or improved anthropometric parameters in patients receiving intensive chemotherapy.     

Individually determined dosing of filgrastim after autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation in patients with malignant lymphoma--results of a prospective multicentre controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: To explore the safety and effectiveness of the individually determined application granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT). METHODS: The administration of G-CSF from day +5 (arm A) was compared in a randomised, controlled trial with delayed, individually determined administration (G-CSF started when WBC >or= 0.5 x 10(9)/L and ANC >or= 0.1 x 10(9)/L or at day +10; arm B), and with placebo (arm C). RESULTS: One hundred and six patients, median age 45 (range 21-64), all with malignant lymphoma treated with BEAM chemotherapy were analysed. A significant difference in the time to neutrophil engraftment and in the duration of neutropenia <0.5 x 10(9)/L and <1.0 x 10(9)/L was observed between the arms (P = 0.04-<0.0001) with a 1-d prolongation of the median durations in arm B in comparison with arm A but a 2-4-d prolongation in the placebo arm C in comparison with arm B. The median number and range of days to neutrophil engraftment >0.5 x 10(9)/L after graft re-infusion was 10 (9-14) in arm A; 11 (9-19) in arm B; and 14 (10-30) in arm C (P < 0.0001). Engraftment of platelets to >20 x 10(9)/L and >50 x 10(9)/L was significantly delayed in the arms using G-CSF in comparison with placebo (P = 0.04-0.002) without any increase in bleeding or in transfusion requirement. There was no difference in the incidence and duration of transplant-related complications and their treatment between the arms. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has confirmed the safety of individually determined administration of G-CSF. The optimal timing of G-CSF application after ASCT in patients with good-quality grafts is shortly before expected spontaneous engraftment.     

A prospective randomized trial of Filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF) given at different times after unrelated bone marrow transplantation.

A study was done to compare treatment with Filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF) given at three different times after unrelated bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Sixty-nine patients grafted with HLA-A, -B and -DR-compatible unrelated bone marrow were randomized to Filgrastim (5 microg/kg/day) starting on day 0 (n = 23), day +5 (n = 23) or day +10 (n = 23) after BMT. No significant differences were detected in hematological recovery, days with fever, days on antibiotics, incidence of bacteremia or need for erythrocyte, platelet and granulocyte transfusions between the three groups. Patients given Filgrastim starting on day 0, day +5 or day +10, respectively, reached an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >0.5 x 109/l on a median of 17, 16 and 16 days after BMT. Starting Filgrastim treatment on day +10, rather than on day 0, reduced the costs of Filgrastim by $1060, with no significant change in the median number of days-to-hospital discharge in the three Filgrastim-treated groups. The incidences of acute and chronic GVHD, transplantation-related mortality, relapse, leukemia-free survival and patient survival (PS) were similar in all groups.     

Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rh-G-CSF) may accelerate hematopoietic recovery after HLA-identical sibling allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

We studied the effects of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on hematopoietic recovery and clinical outcome in patients undergoing allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation. Fifty-six patients with hematological malignancies who underwent allogeneic PBSC transplantation between 1995 and 1998 were entered into this study. Twenty-eight patients who received daily G-CSF from day +1 after allogeneic PBSC transplantation until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) reached >0.5 x 10(9)/l for 3 consecutive days were compared with 28 patients (control group) who did not receive G-CSF in a non-randomized manner. The study group and the control group were comparable with respect to baseline patient and transplantation characteristics. Median times to ANC of >0.5 x 10(9)/l and 1 x 10(9)/l with or without G-CSF were 12 days (range 8-21), 13 days (10-32) (P = 0.04) and 13 days (9-21), 15 days (11-44) (P = 0.02), respectively. Median times to reach a platelet count of >20 x 10(9)/l with and without G-CSF were 11 days (0-20) and 13 days (9-26), respectively (P = 0.03). The incidence of febrile episodes was significantly lower with G-CSF, 75% vs 100% (P = 0.008). Patients receiving G-CSF had less grade III-IV mucositis than those who did not receive G-CSF (P = 0.01). There was also no increase in the incidence and severity of acute GVHD in patients using G-CSF (P = 0.22). Although the number of relapsing patients was greater in the G-CSF group (seven vs three patients), this was not statistically significant (P = 0.24). Disease-free and overall survival rates did not differ between the two groups (P = 0.58 and 0.53, respectively). The administration of G-CSF after allogeneic PBSC transplantation provided faster neutrophil and platelet engraftment associated with less severe mucositis and less febrile episodes.