Management of metastatic melanoma patients with brain metastases

Brain metastases seem to be an almost inevitable complication in patients with metastatic melanoma. Except for the rare patients who can undergo successful surgical resection of brain metastases, current management strategies do not appear adequate and result in a poor outcome (median survival, 2–4 months). In recent small series, stereotactic radiosurgery or gamma-knife treatment has suggested improvement in local control compared with whole brain radiation therapy. We have recently shown prolonged survival (11.1 months) using a multimodality treatment approach in 44 sequential patients with melanoma brain metastases. A subsequent study demonstrated that the outcome of biochemotherapy for metastatic melanoma is not affected by the presence or absence of brain metastases. Our results suggest that the outcome of patients with melanoma brain metastases can be improved using a multidisciplinary management strategy.     

The treatment of brain metastases in melanoma patients

The incidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases in patients with melanoma ranges from 10% to 40% in clinical studies and is even higher in autopsy series with as many as two-thirds of patients with metastatic melanoma having CNS involvement. Treatment options for patients with cerebral metastases are limited and depend largely on the number and the size of the lesions and on the extracranial extension of metastatic disease. This report gives the results of different treatment modalities in patients with melanoma metastases to the brain. As data from prospective randomized studies are lacking, the general recommendations based on clinical series reports are: (i) the combination of surgery and whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is superior to WBRT alone for the treatment of single brain metastasis in patients with limited or absent systemic disease and good neurological condition. (ii) Radio surgery, alone or in conjunction with WBRT, yields results which are comparable to those reported after surgery followed by WBRT, provided that the lesion's diameter does not exceed 3 cm. With the use of WBRT after surgery or radio surgery the local control seems better (with the combined approach), but the overall survival does not improve. (iii) WBRT alone or in combination with chemotherapy is the treatment of choice in patients with single brain metastasis not amenable to surgery or radio surgery, with an active systemic disease, and in patients with multiple brain metastases. Chemotherapy may be also offered to patients with a good performance status, or after recurrence to local therapy.     

Prognostic factors for survival in melanoma patients with brain metastases

BACKGROUND:

One of the most common and deadly complications of melanoma is brain metastases. The outcomes of advanced melanoma patients who developed brain metastases were reviewed to identify significant prognostic factors for overall survival (OS).

METHODS:

An institutional database of advanced melanoma patients enrolled on clinical trials in the Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology from 1986 to 2004 was reviewed and patients who developed brain metastases were identified. Date of diagnosis, patient age, pattern of brain involvement, timing relative to extracranial metastases, prior response to systemic therapy, and treatments given for brain metastases were assessed as potential prognostic factors for OS.

RESULTS:

Among 743 melanoma patients enrolled in clinical trials for regional or systemic metastatic disease, 330 (44%) patients developed brain metastases. The median OS after the diagnosis of brain metastases was 4.7 months. Diagnosis before 1996, increased number of parenchymal brain metastases, leptomeningeal involvement, and development of brain metastases after receiving systemic therapy for extracranial metastases were found to be significant prognostic factors for OS. Among patients who received systemic therapy as the initial treatment of brain metastases, patients who previously responded to systemic therapies had longer survival than patients who had not responded.

CONCLUSIONS:

The era, pattern, and timing of melanoma brain metastases were found to be strongly associated with survival. Previous responsiveness to systemic therapies did not predict better outcomes overall, but it did correlate with improved survival for patients with brain metastases who were treated with systemic therapies. These factors may be used in guiding patient management and for stratifying patients in clinical trials. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Selection of patients with melanoma brain metastases for aggressive treatment

The purpose of this study was to determine prognostic factors for patients with melanoma brain metastases that can be recommended for patient selection for clinical trials. A retrospective review was conducted of 65 patients irradiated for brain metastases from 1990 to 1997. Pretreatment factors analyzed for influence on survival included age, stage, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), extracranial metastases, the number and location of brain lesions, disease-free interval from initial diagnosis, total dose of radiation, and number of fractions administered. Prognosis was also analyzed by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analyses (RPA) classes. The data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Median survival was 4 months. RPA class distribution was I-25%, II-48%, and III-28% with a median survival of 6.5, 3.5, and 2.5 months, respectively (p = 0.0098 by log-rank test). KPS less than 70% (p = 0.0039), and the presence of extracranial metastases (p = 0.03), predicted a worse prognosis on univariate analysis. Both factors remained significant on multivariate analysis. The prognosis of patients receiving radiotherapy for brain metastases is related to RPA class, the presence of extracranial metastases, and KPS. These criteria should be employed in selecting patients for aggressive protocol treatment, or for more protracted brain irradiation off protocol.     

Multimodality management of brain metastases in metastatic melanoma patients

Brain metastases are a frequent complication of advanced melanoma. Neurosurgery (generally followed by radiotherapy) may be useful in managing solitary, superficial brain metastases in good performance status patients, as well as for diagnostic purposes. Since most patients are not felt to be resectable and concurrent extracranial metastases frequently are present, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has become the de facto treatment standard. WBRT has resulted in disappointing outcomes, resulting in a 3.6-4.1-month median survival. Recent studies have suggested that focal irradiation using linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery or gamma-knife technologies can result in excellent local control and prolonged survival in some patients. It is possible that more aggressive combined modality treatment strategies, such as addition of systemic therapy, may further improve outcome. Current data suggest that aggressive treatment of patients with up to five brain melanoma brain metastases is capable of producing prolonged survival in many patients, including some long-term complete responses.     

Risk of intracranial hemorrhage with anticoagulation therapy in melanoma patients with brain metastases

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication in melanoma patients with brain metastases (BM). The management of these patients is challenging because of the high risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and the limited data available on the safety of anticoagulation in this scenario. We reviewed the treatments and outcomes among melanoma patients with BM and VTE at our institution to determine the safety of anticoagulation in these patients. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify melanoma patients with BM who were diagnosed with VTE. The clinical characteristics of the BM and the VTE, the treatments given for VTE, subsequent ICH, and overall survival (OS) were determined. The characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients who received systemic anticoagulation and those who did not. A total of 74 evaluable melanoma patients with BM and VTE were identified. Fifty-seven (77%) patients received systemic anticoagulation. There was no significant difference in the number (P=0.40) or the maximum diameter (P=0.55) of brain metastasis between the patients who received anticoagulation and those who did not. Two (4%) patients who received anticoagulation developed ICH, which was not statistically different from the patients who did not receive anticoagulation (0%, P=1.00). There was a trend toward longer OS from VTE among patients who received systemic anticoagulation (median OS: 4.2 vs. 1.2 months, P=0.06). Anticoagulation for VTE did not significantly increase the risk of ICH or decrease OS in patients with melanoma BM. These data support the safety of systemic anticoagulation for VTE in these patients.     

Survival and prognostic factors in patients with brain metastases from malignant melanoma

AIM: We wanted to determine the factors influencing survival in a retrospective review of patients with melanoma brain metastases to permit more specific recommendations regarding therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the data of 100 patients treated at the Department of Dermatology and Radiation Oncology, University of Zurich, and the Klinik im Park, Zurich. Information on potential prognostic factors (age, sex, location of the primary tumor, Clark level, Breslow index, histological type, number of brain metastases, stage at initial diagnosis, location of brain metastases, and therapy) was collected from the medical records of 100 patients treated between 1966 and 2002. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify significant prognostic factors. RESULTS: The overall median survival time was 4.8 months, with 6-month, 1-year and 2-year survival percentages of 36, 14 and 5%, respectively. Univariate analysis indicated that survival correlated significantly with radiotherapy (partial and whole brain), surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, chemotherapy, Clark level and Breslow index. Treatment with temozolomide (p = 0.052) and number of brain metastases (p = 0.07) failed to be statistically significant. Multivariate analysis confirmed radiotherapy (partial and whole brain), surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, chemotherapy and the location of brain metastases as independent and significant prognostic factors of survival. The remaining factors did not reach statistical significance in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy, chemotherapy and especially surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery seem to significantly prolong survival, as shown by multivariate analysis. Treatment with temozolomide will possibly play an important role in the future management of patients with brain metastases from cutaneous melanoma, but further prospective studies to verify this assumption are urgently needed.     

Metastatic melanoma: prognostic factors and survival in patients with brain metastases

There is no standard therapy for recurrent anaplastic glioma (AG). Salvage therapies include alkylator-based chemotherapy, re-resection with or without carmustine implants, re-irradiation and bevacizumab. Bendamustine is a novel bifunctional alkylator with CNS penetration never previously evaluated in AG. Assess response and toxicity of bendamustine in recurrent AG in a phase II trial. Adults with radiation and temozolomide refractory recurrent AG were treated with bendamustine. A cycle of bendamustine was defined as two consecutive days of treatment (100 mg/m²/day) administered once every 4 weeks. Success of treatment was defined as progression free survival (PFS) at 6 months of 40?% or better. Twenty-six adults [16 males; 10 females: median age 40 years (range 30–65)] were treated, 12 at first recurrence and 17 at second recurrence. Prior salvage therapy included re-resection (14), chemotherapy (11) and re-radiation (2). Grade 3 treatment-related toxicities included lymphopenia (11 patients; Grade 4 in 3), myalgia, pneumonia, diarrhea, leukopenia, allergic reaction and thrombocytopenia in one patient each. One patient discontinued therapy due to toxicity. There were five instances of bendamustine dose delays all due to lymphopenia. There were no dose reductions due to toxicity. The median number of cycles of therapy was 3 (range 1–8). Best radiographic response was progressive disease in 12 (46?%), stable disease in 13 (50?%) and partial response in 1 (4?%). Median, 6- and 12-month PFS was 2.7 months (range 1–52), 27 and 8?% respectively. In patients with recurrent AG refractory to Z, bendamustine has manageable toxicity and modest single agent activity though not meeting pre-specified study criteria.     

Efficacy and safety of ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma and brain metastases

Patients with melanoma brain metastases have a poor prognosis and historically have been excluded from clinical trials. The Expanded Access Program (EAP) provided an opportunity to evaluate the feasibility of ipilimumab (3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses) in patients with stage 3 (unresectable) or 4 melanoma and asymptomatic brain metastases, who had failed or did not tolerate previous treatments and had no other therapeutic option available. Tumor assessments were conducted at baseline and week 12 using immune-related response criteria and patients were monitored for adverse events (AEs). Of 855 patients participating in the EAP in Italy, 146 had asymptomatic brain metastases. With a median follow-up of 4 months, the global disease control rate was 27 %, including 4 patients with a complete response and 13 with a partial response. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.8 and 4.3 months, respectively and approximately one-fifth of patients were alive 1 year after starting ipilimumab. In total, 29 % of patients reported a treatment-related AE of any grade, which were grade 3/4 in 6 % of patients. AEs were generally reversible with treatment as per protocol-specific guidelines. Ipilimumab shows durable benefits in some patients with advanced melanoma metastatic to the brain, with safety results consistent with those previously reported in clinical trials.     

Biochemotherapy of metastatic melanoma in patients with or without recently diagnosed brain metastases

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases are an alarming complication of advanced melanoma, frequently contributing to patient demise. The authors performed a retrospective analysis to determine whether the treatment of metastatic melanoma with biochemotherapy would result in similar outcomes if brain metastases were first controlled with aggressive, central nervous system (CNS)-directed treatment. METHODS: Seventy melanoma patients were treated with biochemotherapy for metastatic melanoma between 1999 and 2005. Of these, 20 patients had recently diagnosed brain metastases, whereas 50 did not. Brain metastases (if present) were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery >or=28 days prior to systemic therapy. All patients were treated with biochemotherapy consisting of either dacarbazine or temozolomide in combination with a 96-hour continuous intravenous infusion of interleukin-2 and subcutaneous interferon-alpha-2B. The primary endpoint was survival from the time of the initial diagnosis of metastatic disease. RESULTS: Median survival from the time of the diagnosis of metastatic melanoma was 15.8 months for patients with brain metastases and 11.1 months for those without CNS involvement (P = .26 by the log-rank test; P = .075 by the Gehan Wilcoxon test). Dacarbazine-based and temozolomide-based regimens appeared similar with regard to their effect on overall survival and CNS disease progression. A plateau in further brain recurrences was observed in patients who survived for > 20 months. CONCLUSIONS: Data from the current study suggest that the outcome of biochemotherapy is comparable in patients with and those without brain metastases, if brain metastases are controlled with multidisciplinary treatment. Prolonged survival can be achieved in approximately 15% of patients, regardless of whether or not brain metastases are present.     

Temozolomide in advanced malignant melanoma with small brain metastases

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of radiotherapy (RT) in patients who have brain metastases from melanoma is limited. In this study, the authors evaluated the efficacy of treatment with temozolomide in patients with metastatic melanoma, including small brain metastases, who did not require immediate RT and investigated the feasibility of deferring RT. METHODS: Patients with brain metastasis were identified from 3 prospective studies of temozolomide (with or without immunotherapy) for metastatic melanoma. Patients with brain metastasis that measured >2 cm, extensive edema, and localization in the brain stem were excluded from the study. For the current analysis, patients with leptomeningeal metastasis and patients who received previous stereotactic RT were excluded. In patients who achieved a systemic response or stabilization to temozolomide, the response of brain metastasis and the necessity for palliative cranial RT were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 179 patients who received temozolomide for advanced melanoma, 52 patients with brain metastasis were evaluable. Stabilization of systemic metastasis was noted in 7 of 52 patients (13%), and there were 6 responses (5 partial responses and 1 complete response; 11%); thus, in those 13 patients, 6 had stabilization of brain metastasis (11%) and 5 had a response (2 partial responses and 3 complete responses; 9%). Immunotherapy did not influence the neurologic response. The median time to neurologic progression was 7 months (range 2-15, months). RT for cerebral recurrence was required in 2 patients. The median survival of patients with brain metastases was 5.6 months (95% confidence interval, 4.4-6.8 months). Intracranial hemorrhagic complications were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that it is feasible to treat patients who have advanced melanoma and small brain metastasis with temozolomide as the single treatment. The small subset of patients with systemic response usually showed durable stabilization or a response of brain metastasis. With this approach, neurologic disease can be controlled, and cranial irradiation may be deferred and even withheld in most of patients.     

Therapy of hematogenous melanoma brain metastases with endostatin.

PURPOSE: Cerebral metastases represent the most common type of brain tumors. This study investigated the effects of endogenous endostatin on hematogenous cerebral melanoma metastases. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Murine K1735 melanoma cells were transfected with the mouse endostatin cDNA. Experimental tumors were induced either by s.c. injection, intracerebral implantation, or via injection into the internal carotid artery to simulate hematogenous metastatic spread. The effects of endostatin expression on tumor incidence, growth pattern, and vascularity were analyzed. RESULTS: In vitro secretion of endostatin by 2.5 x 10(5) cells within 24 hours was 0.12 +/- 0.03 ng, 4.35 +/- 0.4, and 1.18 +/- 0.7 ng/mL for wild type and two endostatin-transfected K1735 clones termed K1735-endo/2 and K1735-endo/8, respectively. Tumor inhibition in vivo correlated with endogenous endostatin production. Within 25 days, growth of s.c. K1735-endo/2 tumors was <20% compared with wild-type controls. Following intracerebral implantation the average survival time of mice was 27.8 +/- 2.6 versus 13.3 +/- 3.7 days in the K1735-endo/2 versus the wild-type group, respectively. Intracarotid injection of 1 x 10(5) wild-type cells killed the mice within 24 +/- 1.8 days. In contrast, endostatin expression prevented macroscopic metastatic tumor growth in 11 of 12 mice, although viable microscopic tumor pockets were detectable in all animals. CONCLUSION: Endostatin inhibits tumor progression of multiple cerebral metastases in vivo. Hematogenous micrometastases are more efficiently suppressed than tumors resulting from high focal cell numbers which may be due to a higher angiogenic signaling exerted by massive cell deposits. Endostatin may prevent solid tumor growth more effectively by inhibition of early angiogenesis.     

Seizure prophylaxis and melanoma brain metastases

Melanoma has a high propensity to metastasize to the brain. In patients with brain metastases (BM) survival is limited, neurologic morbidity is high, with seizure incidence reported up to 67%. Current guidelines recommend against antiepileptic drug prophylaxis (AED PPX) in patients without a history of seizure. We reviewed our experience with melanoma BM to determine the efficacy of AED PPX in the era of second generation AED and to delineate risk factors associated with development of seizures. We reviewed records of all patients treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center with melanoma and BM between May 2006 and October 2008. Seizure risk was studied relative to BM characteristics at diagnosis and AED PPX. We identified 109 patients. Median age was 61 years (range 29–91); 56% had no neurologic symptoms at diagnosis. On neuroimaging, 94% (102/109) had cortical lesions, 60% (65/109) had more than one supratentorial lesion, 54% (59/109) had hemorrhage. Seizure led to diagnosis of BM in 13% (14/109); 20% (22/109) developed seizures later. On univariate analysis among patients without a seizure at diagnosis, AED-PPX was significantly associated with decreased risk of seizure (P = 0.03) with 3-month seizure rate of 0% compared to 17% without AED-PPX. Hemorrhage (P < 0.001) and multiple supratentorial metastases (P = 0.03) were associated with increased seizure risk. Melanoma patients with multiple supratentorial BM and hemorrhage may have an increased risk of seizure. AED PPX may be effective in selected patients, and should be addressed in a randomized controlled trial.