外侧半月板腘肌腱区损伤的缝合方法

目的介绍一种经前方关节镜入路进行全关节内半月板缝合的手术技术,探讨外侧半月板腘肌腱区安全、有效的修补方法。方法2002年7月至2006年5月,共采用经前方入路的全内缝合技术修补外侧半月板腘肌腱区损伤36例,其中合并前交叉韧带损伤26例,单纯桶柄样撕裂2例,盘状软骨损伤8例。常规关节镜前内及前外侧入路,缝合时关节镜置于前外侧入路,前内侧入路为缝合通道。膝关节屈曲90°位内翻,呈“4”字位。将预装配可吸收缝线的缝合钩通过前内侧入路置入关节内,在腘肌腱两侧分别进行缝合,关节内完成垂直褥式缝合、过线、打结、剪线的全部操作步骤。合并前交叉韧带损伤者同时行韧带重建手术,具备修补性的盘状软骨损伤者在修补术之前进行成形术。结果其中30例得到随访,平均随访25.8个月。采用临床检查及二次手术探查对半月板愈合状况进行综合评估。30例可随访病例全部进行了临床检查,均属于“无症状”,其中26例进行了二次手术探查,结果25例完全愈合,1例部分愈合,未发现不愈合病例。无明显手术并发症出现。结论经前方关节镜入路的全关节内缝合技术修补外侧半月板腘肌腱区损伤,可以达到牢靠的缝合效果,有效地避免损伤腘肌腱及腓总神经,获得较好的临床疗效。     

TransLateral ACL reconstruction: a technique for anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Anatomic placement of the femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction confers biomechanical advantages over the traditional tunnel position. The anteromedial portal technique for anatomic ACL reconstruction has many well-described technical challenges. This paper describes the TransLateral technique. The technique produces anatomic femoral tunnel placement using direct measurement of the medial wall of the lateral femoral condyle and out to in drilling. All work is carried out through the lateral portal with all viewing via the medial portal. There is no need for an accessory medial portal or hyperflexion of the knee. Level of evidence Expert opinion, Level V.     

Femoral bone tunnel placement using the transtibial tunnel or the anteromedial portal in ACL reconstruction: a radiographic evaluation

Correct placement of the tibial and femoral bone tunnel is prerequisite to a successful anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This study compares the resulting radiographic femoral bone tunnel position of two commonly used techniques for arthroscopically assisted drilling of the femoral bone tunnel: the transtibial approach or drilling through the anteromedial arthroscopy portal. The resulting bone tunnel position was assessed in postoperative knee radiographs of 70 patients after ACL reconstruction. Three independent observers identified the femoral bone tunnel and determined its position in the lateral and A–P view. Differences in femoral tunnel position between transtibial and anteromedial drilling were evaluated. In the sagittal plane, significantly more femoral bone tunnels were positioned close to the reference value using an anteromedial drilling technique (86%) when compared to transtibial drilling (57%). Drilling through the transtibial tunnel resulted in a significantly more anterior position of the femoral tunnel. In the frontal plane, femoral bone tunnels which were placed through the anteromedial arthroscopy portal displayed a significantly greater angulation towards the lateral condylar cortex (50.92°) when compared to transtibial drilling (58.82°). In conclusion, drilling the femoral tunnel through the anteromedial arthroscopy portal results in a radiographic femoral bone tunnel position which is suggested to allow stabilization of both anterior tibial translation and rotational instability when using a single bundle reconstruction technique. Further studies may evaluate if there are any clinical advantages using the anteromedial portal technique.     

关节镜下全内缝合法修补内侧半月板后角损伤

目的:探讨内侧半月板后角损伤的关节镜下全内修补方法及其临床疗效。方法:自2002年4月~2005年4月间在本院进行前交叉韧带损伤合并内侧半月板后角损伤治疗的患者89例。对其中85例患者应用全内缝合方法手术,经两个后内入路配合髁间窝入路,利用缝合钩修补损伤半月板;同时选择绳肌腱、自体或异体骨-腱-骨移植物重建受损前交叉韧带。结果:可随访者75例(84·3%),随访5~41个月,平均20·2个月。随访采用主观症状检查、临床查体、2次关节镜手术复查(25例)及MRI复查(21例)等。随访到的75例患者的主观症状及临床查体结果均正常,其中25例患者经2次关节镜手术复查结果均为全部愈合;经MRI复查的21例患者中,18例完全愈合,3例部分愈合。结论:关节镜下全内缝合方法是修补内侧半月板后角损伤的理想方法,术后疗效好。     

Arthroscopic evaluation of the ACL double bundle structure

In order to describe the arthroscopic presence of the double bundle structure and to evaluate the value of different portals in knee arthroscopy, we assessed the AM and PL bundle anatomy. We prospectively examined the knees of 60 patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery for pathology unrelated to the ACL. Arthroscopy was performed in a two portal technique using an anterolateral (ALP) and an anteromedial (AMP) portal. With the arthroscope in the ALP, we could distinguish an AM and PL bundle in 28%. Switching the arthroscope to the AMP, differentiation of the bundles was possible in 67%. In all remaining cases visualization of the PL bundle was possible after retraction of the AM bundle. Use of AMP increased visualization of the PL bundle. It seems reasonable to perform arthroscopy for ACL reconstruction with the arthroscope in the AMP and to establish an additional medial working portal to increase the visualization of the femoral ACL insertion sites for optimal femoral tunnel placement.     

Arthroscopic all-inside repair for a tear of posterior root of the medial meniscus: a technical note

This technical note describes a new arthroscopic technique to repair a tear of posterior root of the medial meniscus. Cartilage at the insertion area of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus (PHMM) was removed using a curved curette inserted through an anteromedial portal. A metal anchor loaded with two FiberWires (Arthrex, Naples, FL) was placed at the insertion area of the PHMM through a high posteromedial portal. A PDS suture was passed the PHMM by curved suture hook through the anteromedial portal. Two limbs of the PDS were then used to pass two limbs of the FiberWire through the meniscus. The same procedure was repeated for the second FiberWire suture. The sutures were tied, achieving secure fixation of the posterior meniscal root at the anatomic insertion.     

Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction using a bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft: a technical note

This article describes an original arthroscopic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction technique using a bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft. A rectangular patellar bone block, with a double strand patellar tendon, and a double tibial bone block is harvested. The femoral anteromedial tunnel is made using an all-inside technique by the anteromedial portal. The femoral posterolateral (PL) tunnel is created with an outside-in technique, with a 30° divergence between both tunnels. A single tibial tunnel is drilled, the graft is then passed through the tibial tunnel, and the bundles are separately tensioned and fixed with three bioabsorbable interference screws. The femoral AM bone block is fixed by the anteromedial portal, the tibial bone block is then fixed in an oblique manner in order to mimic the ACL orientation with the knee at 30° of flexion. The femoral PL bone block is fixed at the end with the knee in full extension.     

Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective,randomize clinical study

Anatomical observation and biomechanical studies have shown that the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) mainly consists of two distinct bundles, the anteromedial (AM) bundle and posterolateral (PL) bundle. Conventional single-bundle ACL reconstruction techniques have focused on the restoration of the AM bundle while giving limited attention to the PL bundle. The purpose of this prospective, randomized clinical study is to compare the outcomes of ACL reconstruction when using either double-bundle or single-bundle technique and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation, and similar rehabilitation with both techniques. Sixty-five patients were randomized into either double-bundle (n = 35) or single-bundle (n = 30) ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendons and bioabsorbable screw (Hexalon, Inion Company, Tampere, Finland) fixation in both groups. The evaluation methods were clinical examination, KT-1000 arthrometer measurements, radiographic evaluation, as well as International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm knee scores. There were no differences between the study groups preoperatively. For an average of 14 months of follow-up (range 12–20 months), 30 patients of the double-bundle group and 29 patients of the single-bundle group were available (91%). At the follow-up, the rotational stability, as evaluated by pivot shift test, was significantly better in the double-bundle group than in the single-bundle group. However, in anterior stability of the knee, there was no significant difference between the groups. None of the patients in the double-bundle group had graft failure, while four patients in the single-bundle group had. In addition, knee scores were equal at the follow-up, and all the results were significantly better at the follow-up than preoperatively, in both groups.     

前交叉韧带斜冠状面薄层解剖断面与MRI表现对照研究

目的对冰冻膝关节前交叉韧带（ACL）斜冠状面薄层解剖断面与正常人膝关节MRI特点进行对照研究，为ACL损伤分级诊断建立基础。方法1例（1只）膝关节标本行斜冠状面MRI确定角度，冰冻后沿斜冠状面1mm层厚铣切，观察ACL薄层解剖特点。选择50名正常人对其ACL进行MR斜冠状面扫描，观察ACL的MRI特点。结果1只膝关节标本的ACL在斜冠状面薄层断面清晰显示其全程走行，清晰地显示ACL前内束与后外束，前内束从股骨髁附着点后上方区自后向外侧及前内侧走行，止于髁间棘附着区前内侧方，后外侧束从股骨髁附着点前下方区，自后外侧及外下走行，止于髁间棘附着区后外侧方。斜冠状面MRI能够显示50名正常人ACL全程，显示率为100％。MRI能够区分ACL前内束与后外束结构，显示前内束自后外侧向前内走行，止于髁间棘附着区前内侧方，后外束自后外侧向外下走行，止于髁间棘附着区后外侧方。MRI显示ACL走行与薄层断面显示的走行一致。结论斜冠状面是观察ACL的最佳方位，临床对怀疑ACL损伤的患者必要时行MR斜冠状面扫描。     

Biomechanical evaluation of a new technique for rotator cuff repair

BACKGROUND: In recent studies, investigators have used a cyclic loading model to investigate the efficacy of rotator cuff fixation modalities. HYPOTHESIS: A bioabsorbable poly-D-lactic acid screw and toothed washer implant will provide more stable fixation of rotator cuff repairs than standard suture anchor techniques. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Forty bovine shoulders (ages 3 to 6 months) had 1 x 2 cm defects created in the infraspinatus tendon. There were five repair groups (eight specimens per group) consisting of either two screw and washer implants or two suture anchors. Four suture techniques were tested: single-loaded anchors with simple sutures, double-loaded anchors with simple sutures, single-loaded anchors with horizontal mattress sutures, or single-loaded anchors with modified Mason-Allen sutures. Repairs were loaded at 5-second cycles from 10 to 180 N with use of a hydraulic testing machine. The number of cycles to gap formation of 5 and 10 mm was recorded. RESULTS: Gap formation of 5 and 10 mm occurred significantly later for the screw repair group than for any of the suture anchor groups. There was no significant difference between suture groups. CONCLUSIONS: The bioabsorbable screw and washer provided more stable fixation than suture anchor techniques under isometric cyclic loading conditions. Clinical Relevance: This is a time-zero study of implant performance. The results indicate that the implant may decrease clinical failures in the early postoperative period under standard rehabilitation protocols.     

Tibial intercondylar eminence fractures in adults: arthroscopic treatment

Results obtained from the surgical treatment of 15 cases of type II and III tibial intercondylar eminence fractures—according to the classification of Meyers and McKeever [12, 13]—are reported in this paper. The average age of the patients observed was 22 years (range 18–41). All patients underwent an arthroscopic procedure of reduction and fixation. We used a bioabsorbable suture in ten patients and a nonabsorbable suture in five patients. The suture was passed at the ACL insertion, then pulled out through drilled tunnels and tied onto the anterior surface of the tibial metaphysis. Two of the 15 patients treated underwent an additional arthroscopic procedure because of arthrofibrosis, 2 months after the first surgical intervention. All patients were examined clinically and radiographically with an average follow-up of 18 months. According to the IKDC scoring system, recovery of the 13 patients not undergoing additional intervention was graded as normal or near normal. In 14 patients, anterior laxity was inferior to 5 mm at the KT-1000 arthrometer evaluation. Absorbable or nonabsorbable suture fixation is effective for obtaining a secure fixation and achieves good clinical and functional mid-term results.     

Clinical evaluation of meniscus repair with a bioabsorbable arrow: a 2- to 3-year follow-up study

In a clinical study with the bioabsorbable Bionx Meniscus Arrow we prospectively evaluated 113 consecutive patients (113 menisci) after all-inside meniscus repair. Repairs were performed in either the medial (80.5%) or lateral (19.5%) posterior horn in the red-red or red-white meniscal zone; 66% of patients underwent concomitant ACL reconstruction. Assessment was based on history, clinical examination, and Lysholm [37] and Cincinnati Knee Scores. After a mean follow-up was 33 months (range 24-43; n=105) 21 (20%) patients showed signs and symptoms consistent with a meniscus tear (16 medial, 5 lateral) and underwent partial meniscectomy. In 11 (52%) of the revised patients concomitant ACL reconstruction was performed; 4 (19%) of revised patients were older than 35 years. In the nonrevised the average Lysholm Score was 92.5 and the average Cincinnati Score 90.4. Two patients showed a distinct femoral cartilage damage. Patient's age did not significantly affect the revision rate. Meniscus repair with the bioabsorbable arrow leads to clinical results comparable to those of traditional suture techniques. When stabilized, patients with concomitant ACL reconstruction showed comparable results to patients without ACL rupture. The simple and time saving all-inside insertion obviates the need for additional incisions and avoids knot tying. A proper tear selection and arrow positioning is necessary and should avoid cartilage damage.     

How to avoid the risk of intraoperative cartilage damage in anatomic four tunnel double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Double bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is technically demanding. In order to create four anatomical anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bone tunnels many surgeons adopt new ways of tibial and femoral bone tunnel drilling. From surgical experience, these technical changes might increase the risk for intraoperative pitfalls. An intraoperative articular cartilage damage to the medial femoral condyle or the medial tibial plateau could be disastrous for the patient. It may be caused by an insufficient anteromedial portal technique for femoral AM and PL bone tunnel drilling or flat tibial AM or PL bone tunnel reaming. Potential pitfalls may be avoided by small modifications to the surgical technique. In this present technical note, a sequence of surgical steps are described, which may help to avoid articular cartilage damage to the medial femoral condyle and medial tibial plateau in anatomical four tunnel DB ACL reconstruction.     

Complications of bioabsorbable suture anchors in the shoulder

The development of the suture anchor has played a pivotal role in the transition from open to arthroscopic techniques of the shoulder. Various suture anchors have been manufactured that help facilitate the ability to create a soft tissue to bone repair. Because of reported complications of loosening, migration, and chondral injury with metallic anchors, bioabsorbable anchors have become increasingly used among orthopaedic surgeons. In this review, the authors sought to evaluate complications associated with bioabsorbable anchors in or about the shoulder and understand these in the context of the total number of bioabsorbable anchors placed. In 2008, 10 bioabsorbable anchor-related complications were reported to the US Food and Drug Administration. The reported literature complications of bioabsorbable anchors implanted about the shoulder include glenoid osteolysis, synovitis, and chondrolysis. These potential complications should be kept in mind when forming a differential diagnosis in a patient in whom a bioabsorbable anchor has been previously used. These literature reports, which amount to but a fraction of the total bioabsorbable anchors implanted in the shoulder on a yearly basis, underscore the relative safety and successful clinical results with use of bioabsorbable suture anchors. Product development continues with newer composites such as PEEK (polyetheretherketone) and calcium ceramics (tricalcium phosphate) in an effort to hypothetically create a mechanically stable construct with and improve biocompatibility of the implant. Bioabsorbable anchors remain a safe, reproducible, and consistent implant to secure soft tissue to bone in and about the shoulder. Meticulous insertion technique must be followed in using bioabsorbable anchors and may obviate many of the reported complications found in the literature. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the existing literature as it relates to the rare complications seen with use of bioabsorbable suture anchors in the shoulder.     

Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with femoral cortical bone bridge support using hamstrings

While ACL reconstruction using single-tunnel and single-bundle techniques generally yields good clinical results, more and more studies are now reporting results that are not entirely satisfactory, as this type of reconstruction only exerts control over forward tibial shifting, not tibial rotation, when activities that exert high functional demands are undertaken. As a result, recent years have seen the appearance of numerous techniques for anatomic ACL reconstruction that reproduce both the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the ligament and therefore offer potentially improved rotational control. This article outlines a technique for anatomic ACL reconstruction. Said technique uses central and anteromedial portals, which afford a better perspective of the intercondylar notch. The main features of this technique are: (1) Double bone tunnels in the femur and tibia. The femoral tunnels are created using the out-in technique. (2) Double bundles with hamstring tendon grafts. (3) Tibial fixation by means of interference screws. (4) Femoral fixation in which the graft is supported by a cortical bone bridge and an interference screw in one of the tunnels. We feel that the main advantage of this technique is precisely that it introduces a new feature (a cortical femoral bone bridge) and is not necessarily dependent on specific double-bundle instrumentation, using only regular drill guides to create out-in femoral tunnels. This enables said tunnels to be located with ease and precision. The femoral fixation model itself, with the support provided by the cortical bone bridge, potentially guarantees a level of resistance that can be further increased with the aid of one or two interference screws, thus avoiding the need for post fixation techniques that require the use of screws or buttons.     

关节镜下膝关节腘肌腱重建的实验研究

目的:进一步研究膝关节后外复合体(posterolateral complex,PLC)与腘肌复合体的解剖特点,设计关节镜下重建腘肌腱的手术方法.方法:通过10例成人膝关节尸体标本进行两部分研究,每部分各取5例标本:第一部分进行大体解剖研究,对腘肌复合体(包括腘肌腱、肌腹、股骨附着点、肌腱-肌腹交界区)的解剖特点以及周围相邻解剖结构(包括胫骨平台、外侧半月板后角、后交叉韧带、胭腓韧带、血管)进行观察和测量.第二部分进行关节镜下手术重建技术的流程设计.设计显露腘肌腱的股骨附着点和肌腱-肌腹交界点的关节镜入路以及股骨和胫骨隧道的定位与制备方法,引入移植物并固定,完成腘肌腱的重建.结果:第一部分:腘肌腱的股骨附着点位于滑膜反折区,属滑膜外结构;止于股骨的腘肌腱沟的最近端,与关节软骨边缘紧邻,与外侧副韧带股骨附着点中心相距1.5～1.6cm.腘肌腱走行于腘肌腱浅沟内、肌腱-肌腹交界点位于胫骨后外侧平台的内、外中线与关节软骨面远侧1.0cm线的交点上,内侧距离后交叉韧带外侧边缘1.2～2.0cm、外侧与上胫腓关节的内侧缘紧邻.第二部分:进行膝关节镜下手术操作.采用前外入路及外侧辅助关节镜入路切除腘肌腱近端附着点周围滑膜反折,显露整个附着区,并利用克氏针确定中心点,自外向内制备股骨隧道.通过后外、后内及穿后间隔关节镜入路,沿腘肌腱走行局部切开与后关节囊的结合部,显露肌腱-肌腹交界点,并利用前交叉韧带重建胫骨导向器定位,自Gerdy结节向该交界点制备前后方向胫骨骨隧道.将移植物引入两隧道,并用挤压螺钉固定.5例标本手术均获成功,移植物可有效控制外旋稳定性.结论:根据解剖研究确定腘肌腱远近端的定位标志,通过关节镜技术进行显露及定位,在关节镜下完成腘肌腱的重建手术具有可行性.     

Treatment of tear of the anterior cruciate ligament combined with localised deep cartilage defects in the knee with ligament reconstruction and autologous periosteum transplantation

An acute tear of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is frequently associated with injuries to the joint cartilage and subchondral bone. These injuries may progress to deep cartilage defects, causing disabling pain, and represent a therapeutic challenge in patients with the combination instability and pain. At our clinic we treat patients with the combined injury with simultaneous ACL reconstruction and autologous periosteum transplantation of the cartilage defect. This report describes the technique for periosteum transplantation of full-thickness cartilage defects in the medial femoral condyle. Our clinical report includes the first 7 patients (6 men and 1 woman, mean age 29.1 years at operation) who have been followed for 2 years or longer of 14 consecutive patients (12 men and 2 women). All patients had suffered a total tear of the ACL and a full-thickness defect of the cartilage at the medial femoral condyle. The cartilage defects had a mean area of 7.3 cm² (range 1.0–13.5 cm²). All patients had disabling instability and medial knee pain when walking. The anterior cruciate ligament was reconstructed with a bone-tendon-bone graft of the central third of the patellar ligament. After preparation of the cartilage lesion, the periosteum transplant was anchored to the underlying bone with suture anchors and fibrin glue. Postoperatively, these patients (n = 7) were initially treated with continuous passive motion, followed by active flexibility training and slowly progressing strength training and weight-bearing activities. At follow-up a mean of 31.3 months (range 24–38 months) later, 6 patients evidenced subjectively stable knees, no pain during rest or when walking, and had returned to not too heavy knee-loading work. One patient had a subjectively stable knee, but felt medial knee pain. Meticulous surgical technique and rigorous postoperative rehabilitation are probably of the greatest importance in this procedure. With the use of suture anchors and fibrin glue, the periosteum transplant can be well adapted to the condylar subchondral bone bed. Received: 14 April 1998 Accepted: 4 September 1998     

Displaced avulsion fracture of medial meniscus posterior horn through the intercondylar notch in the patient without combined ligamentous injuries

Avulsion fractures of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus are uncommon and must be differentiated from a loose body. The authors present a displaced avulsion fracture of the medial meniscus posterior horn through the intercondylar notch into the anteromedial compartment of the knee, which was treated by arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation using pull-out suture technique.     

Tibial bone bridge and bone block fixation in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction without hardware: a technical note

Current techniques for tibial graft fixation in four tunnels double bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are by means of two interference screws or by extracortical fixation with a variety of different implants. We introduce a new alternative tibial graft fixation technique for four tunnels DB ACL reconstruction without hardware. About 3.5 to 5.5 cm bone cylinder with a diameter of 7 mm is harvested from the anteromedial (and posterolateral) tibial bone tunnel (s) with a core reamer. The anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) hamstring tendon grafts (or alternatively tendon allografts) are looped over an extracortical femoral fixation device and cut in length according to the total femorotibial bone tunnel length. The distal 3 cm of each, the AM- and PL bundle graft are armed with two strong No. 2 nonresorbable sutures and the four suture ends of each graft are tied to each other over the 2 cm wide cortical bone bridge between the tibial AM and PL bone tunnel. In addition the AM- and/or PL bone block which was harvested at the beginning of the procedure is re-impacted into the two tibial bone tunnels. A dorsal splint is used for the first two postoperative weeks and physiotherapy is started the second postoperative day. The technique is applicable for four tunnels DB ACL reconstruction in patients with good tibial bone quality. The strong fixation technique preserves important tibial bone stock and avoids the use of tibial hardware which knows disadvantages. It does increase tendon to bone contact and tendon-to-bone healing and does reduce implant costs to those of a single bundle (SB) ACL reconstruction. Revision surgery may be facilitated significantly but the technique should not be used when bony defects are present. In case of insufficient bone bridge fixation or bone blocks hardware fixation can be applied as usual. Not supported by outside funding or grant(s): No benefits in any form have been received, or will be received, from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. The study complies with the current laws of the country, in which it was performed.     

Specific compartmental analysis of cartilage status in double-bundle ACL reconstruction patients: a comparative study using pre- and postoperative MR images

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the changes in the site-specific cartilage status after a double-bundle ACL reconstruction using preoperative and follow-up MR images.

Methods

Thirty-six knees that underwent a double-bundle ACL reconstruction from 2001 to 2009 with the available preoperative and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging were included. Patients with a meniscal injury were compared with those without a meniscal injury. The cartilage morphology was classified using a 6-grade scale [from 0 = normal thickness and signal, to 6 = diffuse full-thickness loss (>75 % of the region)]. The changes in cartilage status were evaluated at 14 sites.

Results

Cartilage changes were observed in all sites and were classified according to the site and degree of change. The majority of changes were grade 0 and 1, which accounted for 68 and 16.8 % of changes, respectively. The patella medial facet and anterolateral and centromedial femoral regions showed significantly more cartilage loss than the posteromedial, centrolateral, anterolateral, and anteromedial tibial regions. No significance was observed between the knees with or without combined injuries (n.s.). On the other hand, knees with or without combined injuries showed a different pattern of cartilage change, as demonstrated by different levels of grade change at sites.

Conclusions

The change in cartilage status was minimal after a double-bundle ACL reconstruction. The patella medial facet, lateral femur anterior region, and medial femur central region showed significantly more cartilage loss than the medial tibia posterior, lateral tibia central, lateral tibia anterior, and medial tibia anterior regions. The presence of a combined injury did not affect the cartilage status changes, even though it was underpowered and too short term to assess the influence of the meniscal injury.

Level of evidence

Case series, Level IV.