重新认识肩关节骨折脱位

创伤性肩关节脱位合并骨折临床常见,可导致肩关节不稳定,在处理骨折的同时应注意检查肩关节软组织结构是否有损伤。Bankart损伤是指肩关节盂唇前下方在前下盂肱韧带复合体附着处的撕脱性损伤,多由肩关节前脱位引起,是造成习惯性前方不稳定和脱臼的常见损伤。Bankart损伤经常发生关节囊的异常,多数患者会有前下盂肱韧带复合体的延长及松弛。由于盂肱韧带复合体在维持肩关节稳定中起重要作用,当患者首次脱位时年龄30岁,再次脱位的可能性80%,建议手术治疗。目前经典的修复方式是肩关节镜下修补撕裂的韧带及盂唇。对于骨性Bankart损伤应引起大家的重视,这种损伤下盂肱韧带盂唇复合体损伤同时伴有关节盂前下方的撕脱性骨折。由于关节盂前下方的骨质缺损,可以导致梨形的肩盂变为"倒梨形"结构(inverted pear),是出现肩关节不稳的主要因素。当肩胛盂骨性结构缺损25%时,单纯依靠软组织重建,往往不能达到稳定,应进行肩胛盂骨性结构重建。常用的修复方法有Latarjet手术,异体肩胛骨移植等。对于创伤性肩关节脱位的患者,应注意排除有无肩袖损伤、Bankart损伤、大结节骨折等。对于年轻肩关节脱位患者,应着重关注患者肩胛盂前下方结构有无损伤,而老年患者应注意排除后上方大结节、肩袖等有无损伤。     

肩关节不稳定的分类及诊断治疗研究进展

１定义Ｂａｎｋａｒｔ１９２３年最早使用肩关节不稳定（ｓｈｏｕｌｄｅｒｉｎｓｔａｂｉｌｉｔｙ,ＳＩ）一词,并首次描述了复发性肩关节脱位后盂唇或关节囊自盂缘撕脱现象,即Ｂａｎｋａｒｔ损伤。传统的肩关节不稳定只表示前方或后方脱位。随着肩关节外科临床及基础...     

Bankart损伤

Banka~损伤是肩关节盂唇前下方在前下盂肱韧带复合体附着处的撕脱性损伤。因肩关节前脱位引起,是造成习惯性前方不稳定和脱臼的基本损伤。     

关节镜下Bankart修补术后肩关节不稳定复发的危险因素

背景：关节镜手术治疗创伤性复发性前肩不稳定与切开修补术相比有较高的失败率，本研究的目的是评估关节镜下带缝线锚钉法行Bankart修补术治疗的效果并确定术后肩关节不稳定复发的危险因素。 方法：91例连续入院的复发性创伤性前肩不稳定病例行关节镜下稳定性重建术。平均年龄（标准差）在手术时为26．4±5．4岁，其中71例为男性，79例涉及运动损伤（40例为高危运动）。采用可吸收带缝线锚钉（平均4．3个，范围2-7个）重新固定关节囊盂唇的附着点并紧缩关节囊。全部病例进行了前瞻性随访，在最后一次随访中由与手术无关的专人进行体检和功能评估。 结果：平均随访时间为36个月，14例（15.3％）肩关节不稳定复发，6例有明显脱位，8例为半脱位。平均术后复发的时间是17．6个月，术后发生再脱位明显相关的危险因素是骨缺损，可以是肩盂侧（肩盂压缩骨折p=0．01）或肱骨头侧（巨大Hill—Sachs损伤，p=0．05）。相比之下，肩盂撕脱骨折与术后复发肩脱位或半脱位不相关。肩下方关节囊松弛（p=0．03）和（或）肩前方关节囊松弛的患者会有更高的复发率。多因素分析表明，肩盂骨缺损和肩关节囊下方松弛的患者可导致75％的复发率（p〈0．001）。最后，所用带缝线锚钉的数量非常关键：如患者使用的锚钉为三个或更少则复发的危险性更高（p=0．03）。 结论：复发性创伤性肩关节前方不稳定的治疗中，患者如有骨缺损或肩部关节囊松弛则关节镜Bankart修补术后有不稳定复发的危险。为保证肩关节稳定性重建的安全至少要用4个锚钉固定。 可信水平：治疗性研究，Ⅳ级。进一步可信度参见作者介绍。     

关节镜下后盂唇关节囊折叠缝合治疗肩关节复发性后半脱位

目的探讨关节镜下后盂唇关节囊折叠缝合治疗肩关节复发性后半脱位的近期疗效。方法回顾性分析2015年1月至2018年12月,采用缝合锚技术行关节镜下后盂唇关节囊折叠缝合治疗16例肩关节复发性后半脱位患者资料,男12例,女4例;年龄18～37岁,平均22岁;11例为后盂唇全层撕裂(其中2例合并上盂唇自前向后的撕脱,7例合并后关节囊松弛),5例为后盂唇部分撕裂(均合并后关节囊松弛)。术后肩关节外展30°使用支具固定6周,防止肩关节内旋;术后2～3个月全范围主、被动活动,术后6个月恢复正常运动。使用美国肩肘外科协会(American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, ASES)评分和加州大学洛杉矶分校(University of California at Los Angeles, UCLA)最终结果评分评价肩关节功能,使用ASES评分中的不稳定评分评价肩关节稳定性。结果 16例患者均获得随访,随访时间平均19个月(范围,12～36个月)。ASES肩关节不稳定评分由术前(7.6±1.6)分降低到术后12个月(2.0±1.2)分;ASES评分由术前的(4...     

肩关节前方盂唇损伤的MRI和MR关节造影诊断

目的:探讨MRI和MR关节造影在肩关节前方盂唇损伤中的诊断价值,评估MR关节造影在鉴别肩关节前方盂唇不同类型损伤中的作用。方法:自2007年1月至2010年12月,对经肩关节MRI、MR关节造影诊断后进行关节镜手术治疗的153例肩部损伤患者的临床资料进行了回顾性分析。由1位骨骼肌肉系统影像学医生和1位运动医学医生共同阅片,得出一致的MRI和MR关节造影诊断,并与关节镜下结果进行比较。计算MRI和MR关节造影诊断肩关节前方盂唇损伤的敏感性、特异性和准确性。在MR关节造影下存在前方盂唇损伤的患者中,对其不同类型损伤进行分型,与关节镜下分型进行对比研究。结果:153例中,肩关节前方盂唇损伤78例,肩袖损伤67例,上盂唇从前到后(superior labrum anterior to posterior,SLAP)损伤8例,MRI和MR关节造影诊断肩关节前方盂唇损伤的灵敏度分别为80.8%和92.3%,特异度分别为89.3%和97.3%,准确度分别为85.0%和94.8%。78例关节镜下存在肩关节前方盂唇损伤的患者中,Bankart损伤39例,前方盂唇骨膜袖套样撕脱(ALPSA)损伤32例,Perthes损伤7例,MR关节造影正确诊断Bankart、ALPSA和Perthes损伤的灵敏度分别为84.6%、84.4%和57.1%。结论:MR关节造影较MRI诊断肩关节前方盂唇损伤的灵敏度、特异度和准确度更高,MR关节造影能在术前进一步明确盂唇损伤的类型,为确定术前计划提供依据。     

肩盂骨性缺损致肩关节前方不稳定的生物力学研究

目的评价肩盂前下方骨性结构在肩关节前方稳定性中的生物力学特性和作用,为临床治疗肩盂骨性缺损提供理论依据。方法于自愿捐献的成年男性新鲜尸体取带肩胛骨的肩关节-肱骨标本10具,制备为"骨-韧带"标本;左侧4具,右侧6具。分别于肩关节外展0、90°位时,采用Instron 8874液压伺服生物力学测试系统给予肱骨头50 N的单轴压缩,每个标本按照完整肩关节、盂唇缺损、骨性缺损10%、骨性缺损20%、骨性缺损修复顺序,测量标本位移值。结果肩关节外展0°位时,完整组、盂唇缺损组、骨性缺损10%组、骨性缺损20%组、骨性缺损修复组位移分别为(10.73±2.93)、(11.43±3.98)、(13.58±4.86)、(18.53±3.07)、(12.77±3.13)mm;90°位时,分别为(8.41±2.10)、(8.55±2.28)、(9.06±2.67)、(12.49±2.32)、(8.55±2.15)mm。除骨性缺损20%组与完整组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)外,其余各组与完整组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论肩盂前下盂唇缺损或骨性缺损<20%时,如关节囊韧带复合体未损伤或已修复,肩关节前方稳定性无明显下降;肩盂骨性缺损≥20%时,即使修复关节囊韧带复合体,肩关节前方稳定性仍明显下降;而同时修复骨性缺损和关节囊韧带复合体可恢复肩关节前方稳定性。     

肩关节前方不稳定关节镜下治疗进展

肩关节是人体诸多关节中活动度最大的关节,亦是脱位发生率最高的关节之一。肩关节的稳定性主要依靠肩关节周围肌肉、肩盂的外肜、盂唇以及关节囊、盂肱韧带等软组织结构而非骨性结构来维持,如上述软组织结构的完整性遭到破坏,则肱骨头不能在肩关节运动全程中保持于肩盂的中心位置,从而出现肩关节前方不稳定。     

肩关节前向不稳的治疗选择

肩关节是体内最不稳定及最常脱位的关节,肩关节前向不稳是指肩关节前方不稳定引起的肩关节复发性前脱位,一般是由外伤引起.肩关节前向不稳发生的机制是外伤发生脱位后,肱骨头与前下方关节盂撞击导致前下关节囊韧带复合体损伤(Bankart损伤),甚至关节盂骨缺损(骨性Bankart损伤).同时,一些患者也会由于反复的磨损撞击产生肱...     

游离骨移植治疗肩关节不稳伴严重骨缺损的研究现状

肩关节稳定由多个因素协同维持,当脱位发生时,可能会造成骨性Bankart损伤,甚至伤及肩盂前方及下方的关节软骨、盂唇组织和肩关节盂的骨质,使肩胛盂直径缩小、深度减少、前倾增加,破坏了凹面-挤压机制及盂肱平衡,导致肩关节不稳定,在较小的作用力下就会引起复发性肩关节脱位,增加关节盂骨的损伤.当关节盂骨缺损范围达到20％～2...     

Open and arthroscopic techniques for the treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability in Australian rules football players.

Australian Rules football (ARF) is a potentially violent, overhead, body-contact sport. We reviewed 56 shoulders in patients who sustained their initial traumatic anterior subluxation or dislocation during ARF and who underwent reconstructive surgery for traumatic anterior instability, whether by arthroscopic or by open techniques. Patients were followed up for a mean of 29.4 months after operation, and clinical evaluation was performed with the Rowe grading system. Three types of surgical procedures were performed: arthroscopic suture repair, arthroscopic Bankart repair with an absorbable polyglyconate tack, and open capsular shift with repair of the Bankart lesion. Shoulders treated with arthroscopic suture repair had a 70% rate of recurrent subluxation or dislocation on return to ARF Dislocations treated arthroscopically with the biodegradable tack had a 38% rate of recurrence of instability; three fourths of the recurrences were after minimal to moderate trauma. Shoulders treated with an open capsular shift and Bankart procedure had a 30% rate of recurrent instability, with half of the recurrences caused by violent trauma. In the open group there were no failures in patients who did not return to ARF. We suggest that arthroscopic repair in shoulders with anterior instability and recurrent dislocation does not adequately address the plastic deformation of the anterior capsule that may occur after repeated episodes of dislocation. We advocate open shoulder procedures in ARF athletes to address all areas of the capsulolabral pathologic condition and to provide the most secure repair possible with minimal chance of recurrence.     

Recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder after surgical repair. Apparent causes of failure and treatment

We analyzed the cases of thirty-nine patients who were treated for recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder after unsuccessful surgical repair for the same condition in order to identify factors responsible for failure of the earlier operations and to determine the results of treatment of the post-surgical recurrence. The prior operations included nineteen Bankart, seven Putti-Platt, five Magnuson, three duToit, two Bristow, and three Nicola procedures. Thirty-two shoulders were treated by reoperation. At reoperation the most common pathological lesion associated with recurrence of the dislocation after the prior repair was a Bankart lesion (avulsion of the capsule and labrum from the anterior glenoid rim). This was present in 84 per cent of the thirty-two shoulders that were treated by reoperation. Excessive laxity of the capsule was found in 83 per cent of the twenty-nine shoulders in which laxity was assessed, and was considered to be the primary cause of instability in four shoulders. A Hill-Sachs lesion of the humeral head was found in 76 per cent of the twenty-nine shoulders that were evaluated for this lesion and was large in three of the shoulders. Other factors that were associated with recurrent instability were scarring of the subscapularis muscle, generalized ligament laxity, technical errors at surgery, and severe reinjury. The success rate of reoperation after previous failure was very encouraging. Of the twenty-four shoulders that were reoperated on and were followed for two years or longer, ten were graded excellent; twelve, good; and two, poor. One (4 per cent) of the twenty-four shoulders that were reoperated on continued to dislocate and another shoulder continued to subluxate, making the incidence of recurrent instability after reoperation 8 per cent. Seven of the thirty-nine shoulders did not have a reoperation but were treated with specific resistive exercises. The results in these were one excellent, four good, one fair, and one poor. Eight patients were lost to follow-up.     

Arthroscopic Bankart repair]

Traumatic anterior shoulder instability is the most common type of shoulder instability. Treatment is surgical and there is no single best procedure. Arthroscopic Bankart repair restores stability by reattaching the labrum or capsule directly to the anterior glenoid rim. The aim of the study was to assess the clinical value of the arthroscopic Bankart repair. Between 2001 and 2005 twenty eight patients with traumatic anterior shoulder instability were treated. During the operation the capsulolabral tissue was mobilized from the anterior glenoid rim and neck of scapula, then 3 Mitek suture anchors were inserted and the labrum was sutured to the anterior glenoid rim. The patients were clinically evaluated according to MISS questionnaire. Up till now the recurrence of the anterior shoulder instability were not seen in the 25 patients operated with the aforementioned method. MISS questionnaire values were significantly higher following the surgery. Arthroscopic Bankart repair restores joint stability, helps to avoid complications associated With opening of the shoulder and gives a better cosmetic effect.     

Humeral avulsion of glenohumeral ligaments as a cause of anterior shoulder instability

The avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament labral complex at the glenoid (Bankart lesion), as well as ligamentous laxity are well known causes of anterior shoulder instability. A lesser known entity, the humeral avulsion of glenohumeral ligaments (HAGL), was studied to determine its incidence and its role in anterior glenohumeral instability. Sixty-four shoulders with the diagnosis of anterior instability were prospectively evaluated by arthroscopy for intraarticular pathology, including Bankart, capsular laxity, and HAGL lesions. Six shoulders were found to have HAGL lesions (9.3%), 11 shoulders with generalized capsular laxity (17.2%), and 47 shoulders with Bankart lesions (73.5%). In patients with documented anterior instability without a demonstratable “primary” Bankart lesion, a HAGL lesion should be ruled out. This lesion is readily recognized arthroscopically, and an appropriate repair of this lesion can restore anterior stability to the patient. The pathological anatomy of the HAGL lesion and our treatment of this lesion is discussed.     

关节镜下Bankart修复术治疗肩关节复发性前脱位:手术效果及复发危险因素分析

目的 探讨关节镜下Bankart修复术(缝合锚钉技术)治疗肩关节复发性前脱位的临床效果,并对术后复发不稳的可能危险因素进行分析.方法 2002年3月至2010年3月连续收治肩关节复发性前脱位患者259例,均采用关节镜下缝合锚钉技术进行Bankart修复手术,其中188例患者获得随访.患者手术时平均年龄25.3岁(13～58岁);其中男性143例、女性45例;运动员50名、非运动员138名.随访时采用美国肩肘关节外科协会评分系统(ASES)肩关节评分、Rowe评分以及患者满意度评价手术效果.术前肩关节ASES评分平均72.6分,Rowe评分平均33.4分.对于肩关节术后不稳的复发率、关节活动范围以及术后复发不稳的危险因素进行评估.结果 188例患者术后平均随访38.6个月(12～110个月).术后肩关节ASES评分平均91.9分,与术前比较差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.001);术后Rowe评分平均81.9分,与术前比较差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.001).患者手术满意度调查显示,满意152例、基本满意16例、不满意20例,满意率为89.4%.术后有24例患者复发脱位,总体复发率为12.8%;运动员患者复发率为28.0%,非运动员复发率为7.2%.术后患者平均肩关节外展外旋为75.2°,与术前比较无明显丧失(P＞0.05).关节镜Bankart修复术后复发不稳与患者年龄及是否为运动员明显相关(P＜0.05);而与术前病程长短、锚钉类型、锚钉数目、骨性Bankart损伤、合并肩关节上盂唇撕裂损伤、合并后或下方盂唇损伤、合并肩袖撕裂、关节松弛以及肩袖间隙闭合等因素无明显相关(P＞0.05).结论 关节镜下采用缝合锚钉进行Bankart修复术是治疗肩关节复发性前脱位的有效方法,临床效果比较满意.年轻患者(≤20岁)和运动员患者是术后肩关节复发不稳的高危因素,必要时选择切开手术.

Abstract：

Objective To evaluate retrospectively the results of arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with a minimum 1-year follow-up and to assess risk factors for recurrence.Methods From March 2002 to March 2010,259 patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchors.And 188 patients(50 athletes,138 nonathletes)were available for follow-up.The mean age at the time of surgery was 25.3 years (range,13-58 years).The mean follow-up was 38.6 months(range,12-110 months).All of the 188 patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively with the American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES)shoulder score and Rowe score system.The rate of recurrent instability,range of motion,and risk factors for postoperative recurrence were evaluated.The ASES score was 72.6 preoperatively,and Rowe score was 33.4.Results The ASES scores improved significantly to 91.9 postoperatively(P＜0.001).The Rowe scores improved to 81.9 postoperatively(P＜0.001).And 152 patients were greatly satisfied with the results,16 satisfied and 20 unsatisfied.The satisfactory rate was 89.4%.24 patients(12.8%)suffered a recurrence after surgery,14 athletes and 10 nonathletes.The recurrence rates were 28.0% in the athlete group and 7.2% in the nonathlete group.On average there was no significant loss of external rotation postoperatively(average,75.2° preoperatively and 67.2° postoperatively).Patients under age 20,and athlete patients were associated with recurrence(P＜ 0.05).Other factors including length of time until surgery,type of anchors,number of anchors,presence of bony Bankart lesion,presence of a superior labrum,anterior and posterior tear,presence of posterior or inferior labrum lesion,presence of rotator cuff tear,ligamentous laxity and rotator interval closure did not influence the recurrence rate(P＞0.05).Conclusions Arthroscopic Bankart repair is a good option for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation.Identification of risk factors for recurrence allows for consideration of open stabilization.In the series,patients under age 20 and athlete patients are the most important risk factors for recurrence.     

Intraoperative decision making in the treatment of shoulder instability

Between April 1990 and April 1994, 100 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of anterior instability underwent a diagnostic arthroscopy of the shoulder. Patients with isolated SLAP lesions were excluded from the study. Patients with multidirectional instability, bony Bankart lesions, and large Hill-Sachs lesions were also excluded. Football players and dominant arm throwing athletes were also excluded. Thirty patients remained who had post-traumatic, unidirectional, anterior instability and a repairable Bankart lesion and did not have any exclusions as noted above. All of these patients underwent an initial attempt at an arthroscopic Sure-Tac stabilization (Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA). Twenty-three patients met our criteria for a secure fixation but 7 did not. These 7 underwent an immediate arthrotomy and open Bankart repair. All of the patients were available at follow-up at an average of 47 months (range, 36 to 72 months). The patients were evaluated by the Rowe shoulder rating scale. There have been two cases of recurrent subluxation and one case of recurrent dislocation in the Sure-Tac group. All three occurred over 2 years later. All three had recurrent Bankart lesions and underwent an arthrotomy and Bankart repair. There were no cases of recurrence of subluxation or dislocation in our initial open Bankart repair group. Sure-Tac arthroscopic anterior stabilization of the shoulder can initially give good results but these results appear to deteriorate over time and increased activity of the patient. We currently do not recommend a Sure-Tac repair even in a selective group of patients with an isolated Bankart lesion. This is based on our excellent results following an open Bankart repair and a 13% recurrence rate following Sure-Tac stabilization in carefully selected patients.Arthroscopy 1998 May-Jun;14(4):389-94     

Ultrasonographic evaluation of the Bankart lesion

The Bankart lesion is an essential finding of traumatic anterior shoulder instability. The purpose of this study was to clarify the reliability of diagnosis by ultrasonography (US) of the Bankart lesion when using an axillary approach. Six cadaveric shoulders were examined by US from the axilla. The shoulders were then dissected along the plane of the ultrasonic beam. The labrum at the 4-o'clock position of all 6 cadavers was present along the ultrasonic plane; there were no obstacles from the skin to the glenoid rim, and all cases had a normal labrum at the 4-o'clock position. US images of the normal labrum showed that the labrum was continuously connected to the glenoid rim with no borderline (low-echo line) between them. Preoperative US from the axilla was performed in 75 patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery. Anteroinferior labra were classified preoperatively from the US images as normal, detached (low-echo line between glenoid rim and labrum), or displaced (labrum displaced from glenoid rim), with a diagnosis of a Bankart lesion being made for the latter two types. US findings were correlated with arthroscopic observations. This revealed that for the detection of Bankart lesions, US had a sensitivity of 88.6%, a specificity of 77.4%, an accuracy of 84.0%, a positive predictive value of 84.8%, and a negative predictive value of 82.8%. These results demonstrate that US with an axillary approach is useful in the diagnosis of Bankart lesions of the shoulder.     

Arhtroscopic bankart repair with the suretac device. part I: clinical observations

Although arthroscopic Bankart repair has become an accepted surgical stabilization technique for anterior shoulder instability, the failure rate remains unacceptably high. Little information is available concerning healing of the Bankart repair. The purpose of this article is to clarify this issue by analyzing a cohort of 15 patients who underwent a “second-look” artroscopy to evaluate and treat pain or recurrent instability following arthroscopic Bankart repair with the Suretac device (Acufex Microsurgical, Mansfield, MA). “Second-look” arthroscopy was performed at an average of 9 months following the index surgical procedure. The reasons for this second surgery were recurrent instability in 7, pain in 6, and pain and stiffness in 2. In the 7 patients with recurrent instability, the Bankart repair was found to be completely healed in 3 (43%), partially healed in 1 (14%), and had recurred in 3 (43%); however, 6 of 7 were observed to have lax capsular tissue. In 4 of these cases, retrospective review of the index surgical procedure showed that a technical error had been made during the repair. Two cases had biopsy of the repair site on “second-look” at 6 to 8 months, and this showed residual polyglyconate polymer debris surrounded by a histiocytic infiltrate. In the remaining 8 cases with stable shoulders, the Bankart repair had completely healed in 5 cases (62.5%) and partially healed in 3 cases (37.5%). The higher failure rate with this approach compared with open approaches appears to result from improper patient selection and errors in surgical technique. There is some question concerning healing strength of the Bankart repair, although complete healing of the Bankart does not seem to be a prerequisite for shoulder stability. Success of the procedure might be expected to improve by selecting only patients with unidirectional, post-traumatic, anterior instabilit who are found to have a discrete Bankart lesion and well-developed ligamentous tissue.     

HAGL lesion occurring after successful arthroscopic Bankart repair

Recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder instability following surgical repair may be associated with implant failure and an array of capsulolabral pathology including separation of the labrum (Bankart lesion), humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligaments (HAGL lesion), and capsular rupture. We detail a previously unreported case of a HAGL lesion occurring in a shoulder with an intact arthrosopic Bankart repair following an additional traumatic event. Anatomic repair of this subsequent injury resulted in an excellent outcome. The patient returned to his high-demand ski racing activities without any shoulder limitation.Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol 17, No 2 (February), 2001: pp 206–208     

Traumatic Shoulder Dislocation With Combined Bankart Lesion and Humeral Avulsion of the Glenohumeral Ligament in a Professional Basketball Player: Three-Year Follow-up of Surgical Stabilization

Traumatic anterior shoulder instability has been well documented to have associated lesions such as a Bankart tear, humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament (HAGL), Hill-Sachs lesion, fracture, and nerve injury. To our knowledge, the combined Bankart and HAGL injury in a single acute anterior shoulder dislocation has not yet been reported. We describe a traumatic first-time anterior-inferior shoulder dislocation in a professional basketball player with a combined Bankart and HAGL lesion. The patient underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair followed by open repair of the HAGL lesion with an open capsular shift reconstruction. At 3 years' follow-up, the patient had returned to an elite level of play, with an excellent outcome.