Management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in skeletally immature individuals

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in skeletally immature individuals remain a challenge for the child, the parents, orthopaedic surgeons, and physical therapists. The main challenges are the potential risk of recurrent instability, secondary injuries following nonoperative treatment, and the risks involved with surgical treatment due to the vulnerability of the epiphyseal growth plates. We first present the physiological background for considerations that must be made when advising on treatment alternatives for skeletally immature individuals after ACL injury. The implications of continuous musculoskeletal development for treatment decisions are emphasized. No randomized controlled trials have been performed to investigate outcomes of different treatment algorithms. There is no consensus in the literature on clinical treatment decision criteria for whether a skeletally immature child should undergo transphyseal ACL reconstruction, physeal sparing ACL reconstruction, or nonoperative treatment. Additionally, well-described rehabilitation programs designed for either nonoperative treatment or postoperative rehabilitation have not been published. Based on the currently available evidence, we propose a treatment algorithm for the management of ACL injuries in skeletally immature individuals. Finally, we suggest directions for future prospective studies, which should include development of valid and reliable outcome measures and specific rehabilitation programs.     

The outcome of nonoperatively treated complete tears of the anterior cruciate ligament in active young adults

The results of nonoperative treatment of 72 patients with complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears, documented by examination under anesthesia and arthroscopy, were evaluated. All patients had an acute injury with hemarthrosis in a previously normal knee. Patients having meniscal repair were excluded as were those with collateral or posterior cruciate ligament tears or associated fractures. Treatment in all cases consisted of a standard protocol of early rehabilitation and bracing. A detailed rating of symptoms and function was performed at an average of 38 months postinjury (range, eight to 84 months). Overall results were 11% excellent, 20% good, 15% fair, and 54% poor. Thirty-five percent had ACL reconstruction during the follow-up period. Results indicate that young adults who return to a vocation requiring strenuous physical activity frequently can expect unsatisfactory results after nonoperative treatment of an acute complete tear of the ACL.     

Suggestions from the field for return-to-sport rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: alpine skiing

Alpine skiing is a high-risk sport for injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). While descending a hill, a skier must resist large centrifugal forces at a high velocity, while the knees are positioned in postures that place the ACL at risk of injury. Skiers who undergo ACL reconstructive surgery are prone to a high rate of reinjury to the same knee and even ACL injury in the uninjured knee. A rehabilitation program that integrates the best current evidence of ACL rehabilitation and the science of skiing is essential to a successful return to alpine skiing. Unlike rehabilitation programs developed for court or field athletes, a skiing program must place a large emphasis on slow eccentric-loading and weight-bearing (closed-chain) power and endurance. The purpose of this clinical commentary is to provide the rehabilitation specialist such a program directed toward safely returning the athlete to alpine skiing.     

Non-surgical management and return to play of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: A case report

BackgroundThe rates of athletic anterior cruciate ligament rupture (ACLRu) and subsequent surgical reconstructions are on the rise. Given the associated sub-optimal return to play (RTP) and re-injury rates, alternative management strategies, such and non-operative management, are being increasingly explored. Research demonstrates that there may be a subset of patients with ACLRu, who will benefit from non-surgical management.ObjectivesIn this case report, we aim to detail the comprehensive management involved in a 26.5-week RTP program for an athlete whose ACLRu was rehabilitated without surgical reconstruction.Clinical featuresThe patient suffered a left knee injury resulting in mild knee pain and effusion, with mild stiffness at the end range of knee flexion. On further examination, a slight left knee strength deficit with positive anterior drawer and Lachman's tests were found consistent with ACLRu, which was confirmed with MRI.Interventions and outcomesThe patient was classified as an ACL deficient coper after an initial 8-week conservative rehabilitation approach to the injury. The patient completed their RTP protocol over a total of 26.5 weeks, inclusive of initial strength and neuromuscular control training, a gradual return to restricted non-competitive training, through to competitive unrestricted training and eventual RTP. The RTP was without incident, with the patient achieving sufficient limb strength and power symmetry (>90%), adequate patient-reported outcomes and psychological readiness score before RTP.ConclusionIn select sportspeople, the non-operative ACLRu management may represent a viable and accelerated management strategy for successful RTP. However, more detailed guidelines are needed to guide the RTP process.     

Neuromuscular rehabilitation of a female Olympic ice hockey player following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

STUDY DESIGN: Case study. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the unique aspects of rehabilitating a female athlete participating in ice hockey following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. BACKGROUND: The patient was a 28-year-old female who sustained a traumatic injury to her left knee while playing ice hockey. After 6 weeks of rehabilitation (15 visits), the athlete elected to undergo ACL reconstruction following buckling episodes that she experienced during both skating and walking. METHODS AND MEASURES: Following ACL reconstruction using a patellar tendon autograft, the patient was treated for 6 months in 44 visits. Initial treatments consisted of effusion management, neuromuscular control of lower extremity muscles, and regaining passive range of motion, especially extension. Although instability testing revealed a negative pivot shift and a 2-millimeter side-to-side difference on KT-1000 examination, the patient reported a sensation of buckling when she attempted skating at 4 months (27 visits) following ACL reconstruction. Off-ice strength and functional testing of the lower extremity did not demonstrate deficits. At that time, a specific neuromuscular program for returning a patient to ice hockey was implemented. RESULTS: Following 17 physical therapy visits, which combined sport-specific and sex-specific neuromuscular rehabilitation, the patient was able to return to competitive ice hockey. Six months following ACL reconstruction, the patient reported no feeling of instability during skating. The patient reported a Lysholm score of 100 and Tegner activity score of 9. An on-ice functional test revealed the athlete's score was 80% of her pre-injury score. CONCLUSIONS: Failure of static knee stabilizers can be a cause of instability. Following ACL reconstruction, a neuromuscular rehabilitation program may prevent residual knee instability once the static stabilizers have been restored. A sport-specific neuromuscular rehabilitation program for the athlete participating in ice hockey should be considered.     

Design and implementation of a neuromuscular training program following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Neuromuscular training programs are increasingly integrated into clinical practice for lower extremity rehabilitation. A few rehabilitation programs have been evaluated for patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency and for injury prevention, but there is limited scientific evidence of the effect of neuromuscular training following ACL reconstruction. Therefore, a neuromuscular training program was developed for patients after ACL reconstruction. The objective of the neuromuscular training was to improve the ability to generate a fast and optimal muscle firing pattern, to increase dynamic joint stability, and to relearn movement patterns and skills necessary during activities of daily living and sports activities. The main areas considered when designing the postoperative rehabilitation program after ACL reconstruction were: ACL graft healing and ACL strain values during exercises, proprioception and neuromuscular control, and clinical studies on the effect of neuromuscular training programs. The rehabilitation program consists of balance exercises, dynamic joint stability exercises, jump training/plyometric exercises, agility drills, and sport-specific exercise. The patients exercise 3 times a week for 6 months. The scientific and clinical evidence for the rehabilitation program are described and the main exercises in the program are outlined.     

Early ACL reconstruction in combined ACL-MCL injuries

This study reports 18 patients with 19 combined ligament injuries with complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear and a minimum grade II medial collateral ligament (MCL) tear who underwent early reconstruction of the ACL and nonoperative treatment of the MCL. Inclusion criteria included ACL reconstruction performed within 3 weeks of initial injury, no history of antecedent injury to the ipsilateral knee, and 2-year follow-up data. Associated injuries were noted in 11 patients including 6 isolated lateral meniscal tears, 1 isolated medial meniscal tear, 5 combined meniscal tears, 1 chondral injury, and 1 patellar fracture. Subjective minimum 2-year follow-up yielded a mean Lysholm score of 94.5 and a mean Tegner activity score of 8.4. Serial clinical examinations demonstrated good functional outcomes, range of motion, and strength. No patient experienced ACL graft failure or valgus instability or required subsequent surgery for chondral or meniscal damage. One patient required a second surgery for arthrofibrosis. Clinical and functional outcomes in this study were good with low motion complication rates. Based on our data, early surgical reconstruction of the ACL and nonoperative treatment of the MCL in combined injuries is acceptable and results in excellent clinical and functional outcomes.     

Surgical and Biomechanical Considerations in Rehabilitation of Patients with Intra-Articular ACL Reconstructions

The surgical and rehabilitation management of patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries has evolved rapidly over the past few decades. The purpose of this review is to present a rehabilitation strategy for intra-articular anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction based on current surgical and biomechanical factors. Advances in basic science research and surgical procedures have led to aggressive rehabilitation programs for which guidelines may need to be considered. The literature presents a variety of protocols that do not address the biomechanical differences between varying surgeries that may affect the rehabilitation process. This review will present the surgical variables and biomechanical factors associated with intra-articular ACL reconstruction that need to be considered by physical therapists when planning a rehabilitation program. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1992;15(6):317-322.     

Rationale and protocol for postoperative anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation

A rehabilitation program for postoperative anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction permits adequate tissue healing time and allows early protected muscular conditioning. The program is based on kinematic, biomechanical, and kinesiologic factors as they pertain to ACL function. The program is divided into five phases. The early phases, zero to 12 weeks, are intended to control translational forces across the ACL and to allow necessary time for ligament revascularization and soft-tissue healing. During this period, isometric and isotonic training of the hamstrings and quadriceps muscle groups in a restricted active arc of motion is permitted. Passive motion is encouraged, and progressive weight bearing is allowed. Conditioning of the upper body as well as the nonsurgical lower limb is stressed. During the advanced phases, 12-31 weeks, isotonic muscle training continues throughout a full range of motion. Greater strength, coordination, and endurance to achieve dynamic stability of the knee, preparing the patient for unrestricted activity, are stressed. Approximately 52 weeks of active rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction surgery are usually required to return to a preinjury level of function.     

关节镜下人工韧带移植重建膝前后交叉韧带

目的回顾性研究关节镜下应用人工韧带重建膝交叉韧带的疗效。方法应用LARS人工韧带对16例交叉韧带损伤行关节镜下重建,术后予以早期康复锻练,对临床疗效进行回顾性分析。结果手术时间55～96min,平均65min。16例均随访3～30个月,平均16个月。术后无滑膜炎、韧带断裂、活动受限等并发症。按照IKDC评分标准及Lysholm膝关节功能评分进行评估,术后膝关节功能均得到良好恢复。结论LARS人工韧带的应用能避免取材部位的并发症,操作简便,可早期康复锻炼,极好的恢复关节屈伸度,获得满意疗效。     

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Insufficiency: Principles of Treatment

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries often result in functional disability, particularly in jumping, cutting, and deceleration activities. Some patients can accommodate to this functional loss, while others require surgical reconstruction of the ligament to provide stability and to protect the meniscus from further injury. Nonoperative management involves an intensive rehabilitation program, patient counseling about high-risk activities, and measures to prevent recurrent injuries. Surgical reconstruction of the ACL involves the technical factors of graft selection, positioning, fixation, and tensioning and the avoidance of stress risers. A supervised and intensive rehabilitation program is necessary to achieve optimal results.     

Operative and nonoperative management of anterior cruciate ligament injury: Differences in gait biomechanics at 5 years

Gait biomechanics after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury are associated with functional outcomes and the development of posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis. However, biomechanical outcomes between patients treated nonoperatively compared with operatively are not well understood. The primary purpose of this study was to compare knee joint contact forces, angles, and moments during loading response of gait between individuals treated with operative compared with nonoperative management at 5 years after ACL injury. Forty athletes treated operatively and 17 athletes treated nonoperatively completed gait analysis at 5 years after ACL reconstruction or completion of nonoperative rehabilitation. Medial compartment joint contact forces were estimated using a previously validated, patient-specific electromyography-driven musculoskeletal model. Knee joint contact forces, angles, and moments were compared between the operative and nonoperative group using mixed model 2 × 2 analyses of variance. Peak medial compartment contact forces were larger in the involved limb of the nonoperative group (Op: 2.37 ± 0.47 BW, Non-Op: 3.03 ± 0.53 BW; effect size: 1.36). Peak external knee adduction moment was also larger in the involved limb of the nonoperative group (Op: 0.25 ± 0.08 Nm/kg·m, Non-Op: 0.32 ± 0.09 Nm/kg·m; effect size: 0.89). No differences in radiographic tibiofemoral osteoarthritis were present between the operative and nonoperative groups. Overall, participants treated nonoperatively walked with greater measures of medial compartment joint loading than those treated operatively, while sagittal plane group differences were not present. Statement of clinical relevance: The differences in medial knee joint loading at 5 years after operative and nonoperative management of ACL injury may have implications on the development of posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis.     

The anterior cruciate ligament: a review of recent concepts

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) consists of a small anteromedial band and a larger posterolateral band. Recent findings have shown the ACL to play a major role in the function of the knee joint. The ACL prevents anterior luxation of the tibia, limits tibial rotation, and resists valgus and varus stress to the knee. The most common mechanism of ACL injury involves hyperextension of the knee with a rotational component. Diagnosis of an ACL lesion consists of an accurate history, clinical tests and often, arthroscopic investigation. Treatment of an ACL injury may consist solely of a rehabilitation program, may involve surgical intervention, or a combination of the two. Many surgical procedures both intra-articular and extra-articular, have been used in the past. The most successful approach at this time appears to be a combination of intra-articular and extra-articular procedures. A contemporary trend in rehabilitation following surgery is the use of graduated stages of treatment beginning immediately postsurgery and continuing through to full return to activity. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1986;8(3):110-122.     

Report of the Clinical and Functional Primary Outcomes in Men of the ACL-SPORTS Trial: Similar Outcomes in Men Receiving Secondary Prevention With and Without Perturbation Training 1 and 2 Years After ACL Reconstruction

Background

Athletes often are cleared to return to activities 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction; however, knee function measures continue to improve up to 2 years after surgery. Interventions beyond standard care may facilitate successful return to preinjury activities and improve functional outcomes. Perturbation training has been used in nonoperative ACL injury and preoperative ACL reconstruction rehabilitation, but has not been examined in postoperative ACL reconstruction rehabilitation, specifically return to sport rehabilitation.

Questions/Purposes

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there were differences at 1 and 2 years after ACL reconstruction between the male SAP (strengthening, agility, and secondary prevention) and SAP+PERT (SAP protocol with the addition of perturbation training) groups with respect to (1) quadriceps strength and single-legged hop limb symmetry; (2) patient-reported knee outcome scores; (3) the proportion who achieve self-reported normal knee function; and (4) the time from surgery to passing return to sport criteria.

Methods

Forty men who had completed ACL reconstruction rehabilitation and met enrollment criteria (3–9 months after ACL reconstruction, > 80% quadriceps strength limb symmetry, no pain, full ROM, minimal effusion) were randomized into the SAP or SAP+PERT groups of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Specialised Post-Operative Return to Sports trial (ACL-SPORTS), a single-blind randomized clinical study of secondary prevention and return to sport. Quadriceps strength, single-legged hopping, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) 2000 subjective knee form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-sports and recreation, and KOOS-quality-of-life subscales were collected 1 and 2 years after surgery by investigators blind to group. Athletes were categorized as having normal or abnormal knee function at each time point based on IKDC score, and the time until athletes passed strict return-to-sport criteria was also recorded. T-tests, chi square tests, and analyses of variance were used to identify differences between the treatment groups over time.

Results

There were no differences between groups for quadriceps symmetry (1 year: SAP = 101% ± 14%, SAP+PERT = 101% ± 14%; 2 years: SAP = 103% ± 11%, SAP+PERT = 98% ± 14%; mean differences between groups at 1 year: 0.4 [−9.0 to 9.8], 2 years = 4.5 [−4.3 to 13.1]; mean difference between 1 and 2 years: SAP = −1.0 [−8.6 to 6.6], SAP+PERT = 3.0 [−4.3 to 10.3], p = 0.45) or single-legged hop test limb symmetry. There were no clinically meaningful differences for any patient-reported outcome measures. There was no difference in the proportion of athletes in each group who achieved normal knee function at 1 year (SAP 14 of 19, SAP+PERT 18 of 20, odds ratio 0.31 [0.5–19.0]; p = 0.18); however, the SAP+PERT group had fewer athletes with normal knee function at 2 years (SAP 17 of 17, SAP+PERT 14 of 19, p = 0.03). There were no differences between groups in the time to pass return to sport criteria (SAP = 325 ± 199 days, SAP+PERT = 233 ± 77 days; mean difference 92 [−9 to 192], p = 0.09).

Conclusions

This randomized trial found few differences between an ACL rehabilitation program consisting of strengthening, agility, and secondary prevention and one consisting of those elements as well as perturbation training. In the absence of clinically meaningful differences between groups in knee function and self-reported outcomes measures, the results indicate that perturbation training may not contribute additional benefit to the strengthening, agility, and secondary prevention base of the ACL-SPORTS training program.

Level of Evidence

Level II, therapeutic study.

     

Special considerations for ACL graft selection in the young, active military patient

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is an extremely common injury in the young, physically demanding active duty military population. The diagnosis of an ACL injury in active duty military personnel often requires special consideration in terms of return to function, reliability, and performance of the knee-often in life-threatening situations when one has to rely on a stable knee for survival. This article outlines the considerations of ACL surgical treatment in the active duty military population, with an emphasis on the young, physically competitive athlete to optimize outcomes. Numerous treatment options and controversies regarding ACL surgery will be reviewed to provide a framework for which to perform a reliable and effective ACL surgery in active duty military personnel.     

Partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament: diagnosis and treatment

In sports medicine, diagnosis and treatment of partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) continue to be difficult. Partial tears of the ACL are common, representing 10% to 28% of all ACL tears. As our understanding of the anatomy of the native ACL improves, our accuracy in diagnosing these injuries increases. The advent of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and recognition of injury patterns have more clearly delineated the pathoanatomy in a majority of these cases. Natural history studies following patients with these injuries have demonstrated that fewer than 50% of patients return to their preinjury activity level. Several studies have also documented that progression to complete rupture is a common outcome for patients who want to return to an active lifestyle. Treatment options include conservative modalities (eg, activity modification, functional rehabilitation, functional bracing) and surgery (eg, thermal shrinkage of remaining ACL, complete reconstruction, newer techniques to augment or reconstruct the damaged portion of the native ligament). Studies comparing conservative treatments with more aggressive operative interventions are required to fully evaluate the efficacy of these treatments.     

Current practices and opinions in ACL reconstruction and rehabilitation: results of a survey of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Many different surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols have evolved for the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, and there is a lack of agreement as to which approach results in the best outcome. Members of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM) were surveyed to determine their current ACL reconstruction technique and opinions regarding preoperative and postoperative management. In 1999, members of the AOSSM were mailed surveys asking about their current treatment of ACL injuries. Approximately 76% of the active members responded to the survey, of which a large percentage (92%) currently performs ACL reconstructions. Both the experience of the surgeon and annual number of ACL reconstructions performed were recorded. Most responding surgeons routinely perform ACL reconstructions 3-6 weeks following an acute ACL injury using an endoscopic technique. Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) with interference screw fixation was the technique of choice for most respondents, with the majority performed on an outpatient basis. Rehabilitation protocols showed more variation regarding postoperative weight bearing, immobilization and bracing, length of physical therapy, and return to sport. Most surgeons prefer early postoperative full weight bearing with an average of 3.8 weeks of postoperative bracing. Physical therapy typically ranged from 1-4 months with return to sport at 6-7 months, generally with a functional brace. Patients with BPTB reconstruction were allowed the earliest return to full activity. Although previous clinical and biomechanical studies show good-excellent results with different ACL reconstruction and rehabilitation techniques, currently most surgeons practicing as members of the AOSSM continue to prefer BPTB grafts with metal interference screw fixation. However, there is less consensus regarding the specific postoperative rehabilitation protocol.     

Anterior cruciate ligament injury in the skeletally immature

Although ACL injuries in truly skeletally immature patients are relatively uncommon events, they are experienced more frequently than initially reported--especially in the adolescent population. Natural history data is limited but appears to mirror the natural history in adults with this injury if return to high-risk activity is allowed. Treatment of this injury presents unique challenges because of the substantial growth that occurs through the distal femoral and proximal tibial physes. The physiologic skeletal maturity of the patient must be determined prior to deciding treatment. Techniques of reconstruction include physeal sparing, partial transphyseal, and transphyseal methods. Reconstruction is recommended for any patient with an "ACL +" knee (a complete ACL tear and concomitant meniscal injury) or one who is non-compliant with a nonoperative treatment program and develops symptoms of persistent instability. Short-term outcomes of functional return postreconstruction appear promising, but study numbers are small and follow-up times relatively brief in truly immature patients. Long-term outcome studies are still needed.     

Meeting movement quantity or quality return to sport criteria is associated with reduced second ACL injury rate

The purposes of this prospective cohort study were (1) to assess if second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury rate 2 years after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) in those who returned to pivoting sport was associated with meeting (a) quantitative return to sport (RTS) criteria, (b) qualitative RTS criteria, and (c) combined quantitative and qualitative RTS criteria, and (2) to determine why athletes did not return to their preinjury (level of) sport. Athletes after ACLR performed RTS tests immediately before RTS: seven movement quantity (strength and hop test battery) and two movement quality (countermovement jump with LESS score and hop-and-hold test) tests. A 2-year postoperative questionnaire asked for RTS, reasons for not returning to the same (level of) sport and second ACL injuries. One hundred and forty-four athletes (82%) completed the questionnaire and 97 of them returned to a pivoting sport. Seven of these athletes had a second ACL injury. Meeting the hop test battery RTS criterion (absolute risk reduction 11%; p = .047) and hop-and-hold test RTS criterion (absolute risk reduction 15%; p = .031) were both significantly associated with a reduced second ACL injury rate. Meeting combined RTS criteria were not significantly associated with second ACL injury rate. Therefore, RTS tests after ACLR should at least comprise a hop test battery or the hop-and-hold test to reduce second ACL injury risk after return to pivoting sport. Also, one-third of all athletes mentioned fear of reinjury as the main reason for not returning to their preinjury (level of) sport. This psychological component should be taken seriously and discussed during rehabilitation.     

Anterior-cruciate-insufficient knees treated with physiotherapy. A three-year follow-up study of patients with late diagnosis

To evaluate a functional neuromuscular training program focusing on strength, endurance, postural control, and agility, 26 patients with a rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) diagnosed late were examined before starting a training period and then followed for three years. During the study period, four of the patients had an ACL reconstruction. Twenty-two patients treated without surgery were satisfied with the improvement in their knee function and activity level after three to six months of physiotherapy. Compliance with the rehabilitation program was good and the improvement achieved on completion of the training period was maintained for three years in this group of recreational sportsmen and women. Quadriceps strength, functional knee score, activity level, and functional performance were all improved after training and were maintained during the follow-up period.