共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 78 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
1995年7月~1998年7月,我们共行电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)治疗自发性气胸90例,收到较好的近期治疗效果。现将治疗体会总结如下:1临床资料本组90例,男75例,女15例。年龄9~77岁,平均40岁。左侧自发性气胸40例,右侧45例,双侧5例。局... 相似文献
4.
5.
电视胸腔镜手术治疗自发性气胸25例 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
目的 探讨电视胸腔镜手术治疗自发性气胸的优点、适应证及疗效.方法 对25例自发性气胸患者在气管插管全麻下行电视胸腔镜手术.结果 全组均治愈出院,术后随诊2个月~2年半,均无复发.结论 本方法具有创伤小、复发率低等优点,已成为治疗自发性气胸的首选方法. 相似文献
6.
两孔法电视胸腔镜手术治疗青年人自发性气胸 总被引:6,自引:3,他引:6
目的 研究电视胸腔镜手术采用两孔法治疗青年人自发性气胸的优点。方法 56例青年人自发性气胸均全麻双腔插管,腋中线第5或第6,肋间作观察孔,于腋下第二或第三肋间作2cm操作孔,探查肺尖,找到肺大疱并以卵圆钳夹住从操作孔拉出,于肺大疱基底部缝扎切除。结果 手术时间15—45min,平均32min。术后随访2~42个月,气胸复发1例,再次胸腔镜手术治愈。结论 两孔法胸腔镜肺大疱切除术治疗青年人自发性气胸具有简化手术操作、进一步减小手术创伤、节约手术费用、复发率低等优点。 相似文献
7.
电视胸腔镜治疗自发性气胸患者的手术配合 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
目的 探讨电视胸腔镜治疗自发性气胸的优点及最佳手术配合技巧.方法 对该院2002年1月~2005年1月共计88例自发性气胸胸腔镜手术病人的术前访视及物品准备、术中体位摆放及护理配合予以总结.结果 全部手术均顺利完成,医护配合默契,并在缩短手术时间,减少术中出血方面起到关键作用.结论 微创手术的广泛开展给手术室护士提出了新的挑战,必须不断学习新知识、新技能.同时必须配备专职护士,确保手术配合成功. 相似文献
8.
局麻下电视胸腔镜手术治疗自发性气胸 总被引:6,自引:2,他引:6
目的:探讨电视胸腔镜在局麻下治疗自发性气胸的效果。方法:对2例自发性气胸病人改为在局麻下经电视胸腔镜手术。结果:手术更加简便安全,手术时间更短,创伤更小,术后恢复更快,结论;局麻下电视胸腔镜手术治疗自发性气胸是一种安全有效和值得推广的手术方法。 相似文献
9.
10.
目的 :比较电视胸腔镜手术 (VATS)及开胸手术 (TH)治疗自发性气胸的手术适应证、手术时间 ,围手术期出血量及输血量 ,术后胸管放置时间及住院时间、复发率等。方法 :对 1997年 6月~ 2 0 0 0年 1月期间所行VATS2 2例及TH2 0例结果进行比较。结果 :VATS组手术时间、胸管放置时间及住院时间均较TH组明显缩短 ,围手术期出血量明显少于TH组 ,仅 1例术后输血 2 0 0ml,两组均无并发症、死亡及术后复发。结论 :电视胸腔镜手术创伤小、出血少、手术时间短 ,对心肺功能影响小 ,术后恢复快 ,为原发性自发性气胸 ,尤其是复发性、双侧性者首选治疗 ,继发性自发性气胸应选用开胸手术。 相似文献
11.
《现代诊断与治疗》2016,(20):3787-3789
目的对于单操作孔胸腔镜手术治疗自发性气胸的临床应用价值进行讨论和分析。方法现选择我院2012年10月01日~2015年07月31日就诊的90例自发性气胸的患者作为研究对象。对于以上患者经由随机分组的方式分为对照组与干预组。将其中45例患者分为对照组,经由常规的治疗方法;45例患者分为干预组,经由单操作孔胸腔镜手术的治疗方法。同时,对比干预组和对照组患者的临床治疗效果、手术相关指标水平以及不良反应发生率情况。结果经过数据的对比、分析发现,经过治疗后经由干预组患者的临床治疗效果明显好于对照组患者,且干预组患者的不良反应发生率明显低于对照组患者,两组患者的数据具有明显的差异(P0.05),差异具有统计学意义。同时,经过治疗后干预组患者的手术时间明显少于对照组患者,且干预组患者的出血量也明显少于对照组患者,两组患者的数据具有明显的差异(P0.05),差异具有统计学意义。结论对自发性气胸的患者经由单操作孔胸腔镜手术治疗的方法效果较为显著,能够有效的提高治疗效果、减少出血量,因此在临床治疗过程中具有重要的价值。 相似文献
12.
目的探讨双孔法电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)治疗自发性气胸的临床效果。方法将40例自发性气胸患者按随机数字表法分为双孔手术组和三孔手术组,每组20例。双孔手术组施行双孔胸腔镜手术方式治疗,三孔手术组沿用传统三孔手术方式治疗。均使用腔镜下切割缝合器(Endo GIA)行肺大疱切除,并行胸膜摩擦固定术。对2组患者术中出血量、术后疼痛感觉评分(VAS评分)、镇痛药用量、手术时间、住院时间及术后胸管留置时间等情况进行比较。结果 2组患者均手术顺利,痊愈出院。双孔手术组术中出血量、术后VAS评分、镇痛药量、住院时间均明显少于三孔手术组(均P〈0.05),手术时间、术后胸管留置时间2组比较差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。2组患者术后均无漏气、血胸、肺部感染等并发症,随访2个月~3年无复发。结论双孔法电视胸腔镜手术治疗自发性气胸,可进一步减少术中出血,减轻术后疼痛及手术创伤,并能达到与三孔法同样的治疗效果。 相似文献
13.
目的:总结电视胸腔镜(VATS)治疗自发性气胸(SP)的经验,提高临床诊治水平。方法:回顾性分析近3年来我院收治的25病例的临床资料。结果:VATS18例,VAMT7例。平均手术时间149min,平均引流时间7.2d,平均术后住院时间12d。均痊愈。结论:电视胸腔镜手术治疗自发性气胸安全、可靠,明显缩短治疗时间,减轻病人痛苦,降低治疗费用。 相似文献
14.
Shah-Hwa Chou Hsien-Pin Li Jui-Ying Lee Yen-Lung Lee Eing-Long Kao Meei-Feng Huang 《Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies》2013,22(4):221-224
Minimally invasive surgery is the current trend of approach in various fields. Since May 2006, our team has started implementing needlescopic video-assisted thoracic surgery as the standard surgical treatment for primary spontaneous pneumothorax.During a seventeen-month period, 62 consecutive patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax were operated on. The ages, sex ratio, operative times, blood loss, postoperative pain in visual analog scale (VAS), length of stay and hospital costs were recorded and compared with that of another 62 consecutive patients who received conventional video-assisted thoracic surgery between July 2004 and April 2006. Only the postoperative pain in VAS was significantly lower in the needlescopic video-assisted thoracic surgery group; the rest remained the same. Also the wounds were almost undetectable in the needlescopic video-assisted thoracic surgery patients. There were no major complications, mortality or recurrence in either group.Needlescopic video-assisted thoracic surgery is a high-tech technique which provides safety, effectiveness, economy and outcome comparable to that of conventional techniques. It is also associated with less pain and better cosmetics. 相似文献
15.
超声刀在电视胸腔镜手术中的应用 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
目的:探讨超声刀在电视胸腔镜手术中应用的可行性和效果。方法:自2001年6月-2002年4月我们在33例电视胸腔镜手术中使用超声刀。其中行脓胸清除、纤维板剥脱术4例,肺叶切除术12例,肺楔形切除术7例,纵隔肿瘤切除术7例,贲门失驰缓症手术1例,食道平滑肌摘除术2例。结果:手术过程顺利,手术时间40—240min,平均90min;术中出血10-420ml,无需输血;术后两例轻微漏气,胸液引流量100—550ml。无死亡记录,住院时间9—46d,平均16.5d。结论:在电视胸腔镜手术中的应用中超声刀止血可靠,可以减少出血,减少线头残留,手术视野清晰,无烟无味无刺激地弧光无废气,对术者的影响小,操作简便,有一定的优越性。 相似文献
16.
17.
18.
19.
Sandra C. Tomaszek Stephen D. Cassivi K. Robert Shen Mark S. Allen Francis C. Nichols III Claude Deschamps Dennis A. Wigle 《Mayo Clinic proceedings. Mayo Clinic》2009,84(6):509-513
OBJECTIVE: To review our experience with video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy with respect to morbidity, mortality, and short-term outcome.PATIENTS AND METHODS: VATS lobectomies were performed in 56 patients between July 6, 2006, and February 26, 2008. Two patients declined consent for research participation and were excluded. Clinical data for 54 patients were collected from medical records and analyzed retrospectively.RESULTS: The studied cohort included 19 men (35%) and 35 women (65%) with a median age of 67.5 years (minimum-maximum, 21-87 years; interquartile range [IQR], 59-74 years). Median duration of operation for VATS lobectomy was 139 minutes (minimum-maximum, 78-275 minutes; IQR, 121-182 minutes). Two cases (4%) required conversion to open lobectomy. Median time to chest tube removal was 2 days (minimum-maximum, 1-12 days; IQR, 1.3-3.8 days). Median length of stay was 4 days (minimum-maximum, 1-12 days; IQR, 4-7 days). There was no operative mortality.CONCLUSION: VATS lobectomy is safe and feasible for pulmonary resection. This minimally invasive approach may allow patients to benefit from lobectomy with shorter recovery times and hospital stays compared with conventional open thoracotomy.IQR = interquartile range; NSCLC = non-small cell lung cancer; VATS= video-assisted thoracoscopicVideo-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) surgery was first described by several groups in the early 1990s. Initial applications included exploration of the chest, management of pleural effusion or pneumothorax, and limited resection of lung nodules.1-6 In subsequent years it has achieved broad application in clinical practice as a minimally invasive tool for multiple indications.7-20 Techniques for VATS lobectomy as an oncologic resection emerged after this experience, with many large retrospective series showing the feasibility and safety of this minimally invasive surgical approach.11,12,14-16,21-23 Although the existing retrospective data suggest equivalent oncologic outcomes with VATS lobectomy and lobectomy using a conventional open thoracotomy, prospective studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis and are ongoing.24 Compared with the open approach, VATS lobectomies have the potential advantage of decreased postoperative pain and a shorter hospital length of stay.25-27 Other proposed advantages of a thoracoscopic approach include decreased blood loss, fewer postoperative complications, preserved pulmonary function, decreased inflammatory response, and a more rapid return to preoperative activity.10,11,14,15,20,25 If adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy is indicated, a potential shorter postoperative recovery time may allow adjuvant treatment at a shorter postoperative interval with better adherence and treatment completion rates.12,28VATS lobectomies have been used routinely in our department since July 2006. This report reviews our experience with the VATS approach with respect to morbidity and mortality as well as its potential effect on the length of patient hospitalization. 相似文献