Triple antiviral therapy as a new option for patients with interferon nonresponsive chronic hepatitis C

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of triple antiviral therapy with interferon, ribavirin, and amantadine in comparison with interferon and ribavirin combination treatment in patients with interferon-nonresponsive chronic hepatitis C. We performed an open-label, prospective randomized controlled trial at a secondary referral center. We used a 2:1 ratio, patients received interferon, ribavirin, and amantadine, or interferon and ribavirin for 12 months, and were followed up for an additional 6 months. Ninety-four consecutive adult interferon nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C were screened. Sixty consecutive elected patients entered the study. No patients withdrew because of adverse effects. Forty patients received interferon alfa (5 megaunits on alternate days), ribavirin (800-1,000 mg daily), and amantadine (200 mg daily) for 12 months, and 20 patients received the same treatment without amantadine. At the end of follow-up, alanine transaminase (ALT) level normalization was maintained in 23 of 40 patients (57%) after triple therapy, but in 2 of 20 patients (10%) after double therapy (P <.001, RR = 2.11, 95% CI, 1.43-3.12), whereas disappearance of serum HCV RNA persisted in 19 of 40 patients (48%) and in 1 of 20 patients (5%), respectively (P <.001, RR = 1.81, 95% CI, 1.32-2.47). The safety profile was similar in the 2 groups. In conclusion, in patients with interferon-nonresponsive chronic hepatitis C, triple antiviral therapy for 1 year results in a high rate of sustained biochemical and virologic responses.     

Amantadine triple therapy for non-responder hepatitis C patients. Clues for controversies (ANRS HC 03 BITRI)

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine whether addition of amantadine to pegylated interferon/ribavirin improved response rates among chronic hepatitis C patients, non-responders to interferon/ribavirin and study the dynamic of response. METHODS: In a double blind, multicenter, randomized trial, 200 non-responder patients received pegylated interferon 1.5 microg/kg per week and ribavirin 800-1200 mg/day, plus either amantadine 200 mg/day or placebo for 48 weeks. Endpoints were virological responses, ALT normalization, and histological benefit overtime. RESULTS: Twenty percent of all patients achieved a sustained virological response (SVR). This rate was 8% higher in the triple therapy group (24%) compared with the double therapy group (16%) (P = 0.22). A better virological response rate at week 24 was observed in the triple regimen group (43 vs 29%; P = 0.06), which was lost at week 48 suggesting viral escape. The biochemical response rate was also significantly higher with triple therapy at week 12 (63 vs 49%; P = 0.05) and week 24 (64 vs 49%; P = 0.03). Fibrosis stabilized or improved in 77% of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Re-treatment of interferon/ribavirin non-responder patients should be encouraged since a substantial proportion benefits from re-treatment with pegylated interferon/ribavirin +/- amantadine. In triple therapy involving amantadine, a time wise response and an increased SVR rate in subgroups less prone to viral breakthrough suggest clues for existing controversies.     

Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial of interferon, ribavirin, and amantadine versus interferon, ribavirin, and placebo in treatment naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In this study, we compared the efficacy of triple therapy (interferon alfa, ribavirin, and amantadine) with standard therapy (interferon alfa and ribavirin) in treatment na?ve patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). METHODS: In this prospective, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, multicentre study, 85 patients (amantadine group) received a three drug regimen of interferon alfa-2b 3 million units three times per week, ribavirin 1000-1200 mg daily in divided doses, and amantadine 100 mg twice daily, and 86 patients (placebo group) received interferon alfa-2b, ribavirin, and identical placebo. Treatment was discontinued at 24 weeks if patients had detectable HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). All patients were followed for 24 weeks after completion of treatment. The primary end point was undetectable HCV-RNA by PCR at 24 weeks (sustained viral clearance) after completion of treatment. RESULTS: At the end of treatment, HCV RNA clearance was seen in 32.9% of the amantadine group and 38.4% of the placebo group (p=0.3). Sustained virological response was seen in 24.7% of the amantadine group and in 27.9% of the placebo group by intention to treat analysis; response rate was 30.4% and 34.8%, respectively, in those who completed 24 weeks of treatment. Poor response was seen in both groups among cirrhotics, African-Americans, genotype 1, and those with a higher viral load. By multivariate analysis, genotype 1, high viral load, and low serum albumin were the only predictors of poor response. Addition of amantadine to the standard regimen did not result in any unexpected side effects. CONCLUSION: Response to triple therapy of interferon alfa, ribavirin, and amantadine was similar to standard therapy of interferon alfa and ribavirin. Our results suggest that amantadine has no role in the management of HCV.     

Triple antiviral therapy in HCV positive patients who failed prior combination therapy

INTRODUCTIONWhile advances in the treatment of HCV chronic hepatitis have markedly improved outcomes for treatment-na?ve patients, a large number of patients still fail to eradicate HCV infection[1-4], and improving the re-treatment success rates of these…     

Interferon alfa2a induction therapy in combination with ribavirin and amantadine for the treatment of naive patients with chronic HCV infection

Summary.  Pilot studies have suggested that the addition of amantadine to interferon (IFN) is effective against hepatitis C virus (HCV). Furthermore, IFN induction therapy seems to improve virological response rates. In this open, randomized, multicentre trial we compared safety and efficacy of a triple therapy comprising IFN α 2a, ribavirin and amantadine using high induction doses (6 MU IFN α daily for the first 6 weeks) against a therapy with standard IFN α dosages over the entire treatment period plus amantadine and ribavirin. A total of 158 naive patients with chronic HCV infection were randomized 1:1. Group A ( n  = 81): induction therapy with 6 MU IFN α daily for 6 weeks, followed by 6 MU three times a week (tiw) for 18 weeks and then 3 MU tiw until week 48. Group B ( n  = 77): standard therapy with 6 MU IFN α tiw for 24 weeks, followed by 3 MU until week 48. All patients received oral ribavirin (10 mg/kg/day) and amantadine (200 mg/day). The triple therapy was safe and well tolerated. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to biochemical response rates. Groups A and B did not differ in virological response rates at the end of treatment (33% vs 35%) or at the end of the 6 month follow up period (37% vs 39%). We could not detect favourable effects on sustained virological response rates using induction therapy, in either genotype 1 or non-1 infected patients. In summary, induction therapy with 6 MU IFN α daily did not result in increased overall response rates compared with standard IFN α dosages of 6 MU tiw.     

Effects of alpha interferon induction plus ribavirin with or without amantadine in the treatment of interferon non-responsive chronic hepatitis C: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND: Fifty per cent of chronic hepatitis C patients are non-responders to interferon. At present, there are no recommended therapeutic options for non-responders. AIMS: The safety and long term effect of alpha interferon induction plus ribavirin with or without amantadine in the treatment of interferon non-responsive chronic hepatitis C was evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 114 consecutive patients were randomly divided into three groups with a final 2:2:1 ratio: group A (44 patients) received interferon alfa 2b, 3 million units (MU), three times a week, and oral ribavirin (1000 mg/day); group B (46 patients) received interferon 3 MU daily for the first four weeks and subsequently 3 MU three times a week, and ribavirin as in regimen A; and group C (24 patients) received interferon and ribavirin as in regimen B, plus oral amantadine hydrochloride (200 mg/day). The duration of treatment was 12 months. RESULTS: The end of treatment response for groups A and B was 25% and 29%, respectively, and for group C, 68% (p<0.005). At the end of one year of follow up, a sustained response was observed for six (25%) patients in group C, one (2%) patient in group A, and two (4%) patients in group B (p<0.002). The triple regimen was well tolerated and did not increase the frequency or severity of side effects. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that for the treatment of interferon non-responder hepatitis C patients, the association of interferon-ribavirin has a negligible long term effect whereas a triple regimen including interferon, ribavirin, and amantadine can be an effective and safe treatment.     

Triple therapy with amantadine in treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C: a placebo-controlled trial

The antiviral efficacy of amantadine in patients with chronic hepatitis C is controversial. In this randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, triple therapy with interferon alfa (IFN-alpha)-2a plus ribavirin and amantadine (amantadine group) was compared with combination therapy IFN-alpha plus ribavirin (control group). Four hundred previously untreated patients with histologically proven chronic hepatitis C were randomly allocated to treatment with amantadine sulphate (100 mg twice daily orally) or a matched placebo together with IFN-alpha induction plus ribavirin (1,000-1,200 mg/day orally) for 48 weeks. The primary end point was sustained virologic response (SVR) defined as undetectable serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA (<100 copies/mL) 24 weeks after the end of treatment. SVR was observed in 52% of the amantadine group and in 43.5% of the control group (P =.11). Among patients with HCV genotype 1 infection, the corresponding SVR rates were 39% and 31%, respectively. The virologic on-treatment response rate in week 24 was significantly higher in the amantadine group as compared with the control group (70% vs. 59%, respectively, P =.016). This beneficial effect was mainly related to HCV type 1-infected patients (63% vs. 47%, respectively, P =.012). Independent factors associated with SVR, according to multiple logistic regression analysis, were amantadine treatment, low baseline HCV RNA, platelet counts (>/=250/nL), pretreatment ALT quotient >/=3, and GGT level (<28 U/L) as well as HCV genotypes other than 1. In conclusion, although we could not demonstrate a significant advantage of the triple regimen in univariate analysis, multivariate analysis offers arguments that amantadine should be considered as a potential anti-HCV drug in future studies.     

Combination of interferon induction therapy and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C.

The initial clearance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) during interferon-alfa therapy is dose-dependent. Therefore, higher initial interferon doses (induction therapy) may improve treatment results. This concept was tested in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Previously untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C were randomized to receive 3 different interferon doses during the first 14 weeks of therapy (Group A, n = 130: 10 MU IntronA [AESCA-Schering Plough, Traiskirchen, Austria]/day for 2 weeks, followed by 10 MU/2 days for 12 weeks; Group B, n = 124: 5 MU/day for 14 weeks; Group C, n = 119; 5 MU/2 days for 14 weeks) followed in all by 5 MU/2 days for 24 weeks. Throughout the whole study all patients received 1 to 1.2 g ribavirin/day. On treatment, no differences in viral clearance rates were observed. Sustained response rates were also not different among the groups (A: 48.5%, B and C: 41.3%, intent to treat). When data were analyzed according to genotypes, sustained response was almost twice as high in patients with genotype 1 receiving high-dose interferon induction therapy (A: 44.2%, B: 28.6%, C: 27%, P <.05). In contrast, results were not different in genotype 3a patients (A: 61.3%, B: 75.9%, C: 56.3%; P >.1). These data indicate that high-dose interferon induction therapy may improve the outcome of interferon/ribavirin combination therapy in genotype 1 patients.     

Interferon and amantadine in naive chronic hepatitis C: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Recent controlled trials on the efficacy of an amantadine/interferon combination in treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C yielded contradictory results. We therefore conducted a large, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C: 246 patients were randomized to receive interferon alfa-2a (6 MIU sc thrice weekly for 20 weeks, then 3 MIU sc thrice weekly) and either amantadine sulphate (2 x 100 mg p.o. QD) or placebo. Treatment continued for a total of 52 weeks, if HCV-RNA in serum polymerase chain reaction (PCR) had fallen below detection limit (1,000 copies/mL) at treatment week 10, and stopped otherwise. All patients were followed for 24 weeks off therapy. After 10 weeks of treatment, 66/121 patients treated with amantadine (55%) and 78/125 treated with placebo (62%) had lost HCV-RNA (n.s.). After 24 weeks of follow-up, 25 patients in the amantadine (21%) and 17 (14%) in the placebo group remained HCV-RNA negative (n.s.). During therapy, virologic breakthroughs occurred less often in the amantadine than in the placebo group [14 (12%) vs. 27 (22%) patients; P =.04]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed genotype, viremia level, age, and amantadine therapy [risk ratio 0.4 (95%CI 0.2-1.0), P =.05] as predictors of sustained virologic response. Adverse events and impact of therapy on quality of life were similar in amantadine and placebo treated patients. Compared with current standard treatment (interferon/ribavirin), the interferon/amantadine combination was not cost-effective. In conclusion, amantadine does not add to a clinically relevant extent to the treatment of naive patients with chronic hepatitis C.     

Combination therapy with interferon-alpha(2b), ribavirin,and amantadine in chronic hepatitis C nonresponders to interferon and ribavirin

Standard therapies for the treatment of hepatitis C are ineffective in almost 50% of patients. Amantadine is an antiviral agent that may have activity against hepatitis C virus. In this pilot study, we evaluated the efficacy of a combination of interferon, ribavirin, and amantadine in patients with chronic hepatitis C who had previously failed 6–12 months of treatment with interferon and ribavirin. In this prospective open-label study, 23 patients were treated with a combination of interferon-_2b 3 million units subcutaneously three times per week, ribavirin 1000–1200 mg daily, and amantadine 100 mg twice daily for 6–12 months. Treatment was discontinued at 6 months if the patients had detectable HCV RNA by PCR. All patients were followed for 6 months after the completion of treatment. At the end of treatment, the biochemical response was 47% and the virological response was 30%. However, the rate of sustained virological response was only 13% (3/23). There were no unexpected side effects with triple therapy. In conclusion, triple therapy with interferon, ribavirin and amantadine resulted in a low sustained viral clearance in chronic hepatitis C patients who had previously failed interferon and ribavirin combination therapy.     

Daily or three times a week interferon alfa-2b in combination with ribavirin or interferon alone for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Data on hepatitis C virus (HCV) viral dynamics and on the effect of interferon in blocking virion production have suggested a rationale for daily administration of interferon in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. We compared the efficacy and safety of daily interferon alfa-2b in combination with ribavirin with those of interferon alfa-2b three times a week alone or in combination with ribavirin. METHODS: We randomly assigned 321 patients with chronic hepatitis C to receive standard-dose interferon alfa-2b alone or in combination with ribavirin for 48 weeks or daily interferon alfa-2b (3 million units per day for 12 weeks then 3 million units three times per week for 24 weeks) and ribavirin (36 week treatment). RESULTS: The rate of sustained virologic response (defined as an undetectable serum HCV-RNA level 72 weeks after initiation of treatment) was higher in patients who received combination therapy with three times weekly interferon (51.7%) or daily interferon (46.1%) than in patients who received interferon alone (25%) (P=0.0001 and P=0.002, respectively). Independent predictive factors for sustained virologic response were combination therapy, weight, genotype and viral load. In conclusion, in patients with chronic hepatitis C, combination therapy with induction treatment (daily interferon for 12 weeks) and shorter duration of treatment was not different from combination therapy for 48 weeks without induction treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Induction treatment with interferon for 12 weeks and combination therapy for a total duration of 36 weeks could therefore be cost effective.     

Evaluation of amantadine in chronic hepatitis C: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The benefit of amantadine combination therapy, either with interferon (IFN) alone (double therapy) or with ribavirin and IFN (triple therapy) is unknown. METHODS: We analyzed the effect of amantadine on the end-of-treatment virological response and the sustained response using meta-analysis of 31 randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: Overall analysis revealed a significant effect of amantadine. Triple therapy was the best regimen for improving the sustained response (mean difference: 8.4%, 95% CI: 2.4-13.8%, P=0.002). In subgroup analysis, amantadine did not have a significant effect upon naive patients or relapsers. In non-responders, combination therapy with amantadine was associated with a significant effect on the sustained response (mean difference: 8.3%, 95% CI: 1.9-14.6%, P=0.01). In sensitivity analysis, double therapy did not improve virological responses. Conversely, triple therapy tended to improve the end-of-treatment virological response and was associated with a significant effect upon the sustained response (mean difference: 12.7%, 95% CI: 3.8-21.6%, P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with amantadine is of no effect upon naive patients or relapsers. In non-responders, triple therapy with amantadine improved the sustained response. New randomized controlled trials are required to confirm this meta-analysis.     

Early viral clearance and sustained response in chronic hepatitis C: a controlled trial of interferon and ribavirin after high-dose interferon induction

summary . High-dose induction with α-interferon induces early viral clearance of hepatitis C and combined with ribavirin enhances sustained response. We assess whether adding ribavirin after viral clearance obtained by α-interferon induction increased the rate of viral eradication.Forty-one naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C were randomised to receive, after 4 weeks of 10  m U daily of α-interferon (induction), 3  m U daily for 22 weeks and 3  m U thrice weekly for 26 weeks of either interferon alone (monotherapy) or interferon plus 1000–1200 mg daily of ribavirin (combination therapy). At the end of the induction phase, 23 (56%) subjects had cleared HCV-RNA. During therapy, breakthrough was observed in four patients on monotherapy, but never in patients on combination therapy. The rate of clearance of HCV-RNA was different between monotherapy and combination therapy at the end of treatment (40% vs. 76.1%, P= 0.02) and at the end of follow-up (5% vs. 57.1%, P =0.001). Twelve of the 23 patients who cleared HCV-RNA during induction, but only one of the 18 still HCV-RNA-positive after 4 weeks of therapy, had a sustained response (52.2% vs. 5.6%, P =0.001). Clearance of HCV-RNA at 1 week had a high positive predictive value for sustained response in combination therapy (PPV=0.75), but not in monotherapy (PPV=0.33) . Induction with high daily doses of α-interferon obtains suppression of hepatitis C in more than half of patients, but ribavirin is needed to maintain a sustained response. The rate of sustained response is a function of the time to HCV-RNA clearance. In patients not responding to induction therapy addition of ribavirin does not obtain a sustained virological response.     

A randomized trial of induction doses of interferon alone or in combination with ribavirin or ribavirin plus amantadine for treatment of nonresponder patients with chronic hepatitis C

Background Efficacy and safety of interferon induction therapy alone or in combination with ribavirin or ribavirin plus amantadine were evaluated in chronic hepatitis C patients who were nonresponders to primary antiviral treatment. Methods The study was designed to have 225 HCV nonresponder patients, but at an interim analysis the response rate difference between groups was lower than expected and the enrollment was stopped when 75 patients had been randomized to receive interferon-α2a (group A, n = 26), interferon-α2a plus 15 mg/kg per day of ribavirin (group B, n = 24), or interferon-α2a plus ribavirin plus 200 mg/day of amantadine hydrochloride (group C, n = 25). Treatment duration was 48 weeks. The dose of interferon was 6 MU/day for 4 weeks followed by 3 MU/day for the remaining 44 weeks. Results On intention-to-treat, the sustained virological response at 24 weeks of follow-up was 11.5% in group A, 12.5% in group B, and 12% in group C. Therapy was discontinued because of adverse effects in three patients in group A (11.5%), three in group B (12.5%), and two in group C (8%). Conclusions Nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C may achieve a sustained virological response rate of approximately 12% if retreated with interferon induction treatment followed by administration of a daily dose. The addition of ribavirin or amantadine did not seem to improve the response rates.     

Triple therapy of initial high-dose interferon with ribavirin and amantadine for patients with chronic hepatitis C

Aims: We previously reported the potential effect of combination therapy of an initial high‐dose interferon (IFN) and amantadine on the eradication of HCV‐RNA in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The additive effects of amantadine on interferon and ribavirin combination therapy remain controversial. In this study we investigated the efficacy of initial high‐dose IFN with ribavirin and amantadine on the virological response in patients with chronic hepatitis C with a high viral load of genotype 1b. Methods: Twenty‐two patients with high viral loads of genotype 1b hepatitis C virus were enrolled in this pilot study. Patients were administered IFN‐beta for four weeks and then IFN‐alpha2b for 22 weeks with daily oral administration of ribavirin and amantadine. Results: A sustained virological response (SVR) was shown in 31.8% (seven of 22 patients). With the naïve patients, the SVR rate was 21.4% (three of 14 patients). In patients who could not eradicate HCV‐RNA by previous IFN monotherapy, the SVR rate was 50% (four of eight patients). Conclusion: Triple therapy with an initial high dose of IFN with ribavirin and amantadine may be effective, especially for chronic hepatitis C IFN‐retreatment patients with a high viral load of genotype 1b.     

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) plus ribavirin with or without amantadine in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 infection

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Amantadine may augment virological response rates to interferon-based therapy in chronic hepatitis C patients. Using a novel design, amantadine was studied in na?ve genotype 1 patients treated in combination with peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD)/ribavirin. METHODS: Patients enrolled in this randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter trial were stratified by single-dose interferon sensitivity (stratum I, 24-h HCV-RNA decline >1.4-log10; II, 0.8-1.39-log10; III, <0.8-log10; a reliable means of identifying nonresponders to interferon/ribavirin) and fibrosis grade (F0/1/2 vs. F3/4) at baseline. All patients received peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) 180 microg/week plus ribavirin 1000-1200 mg/day and were randomized to receive amantadine 100 mg twice daily (N = 114) or placebo (N = 95) for 48 weeks. RESULTS: Week-24 virological response rates in strata II and III, the primary outcome, were similar in patients treated with amantadine (63.7%) or placebo (65.7%), as were sustained virological response rates at week 72 (46.5 and 51.6%, respectively). Adverse event profiles were similar and amantadine did not improve health-related quality of life compared with placebo. Interferon sensitivity was the only significant predictor of treatment outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Adding amantadine to peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD)/ribavirin combination therapy does not augment virological response rates in genotype 1 patients. Virological response was almost exclusively determined by interferon sensitivity at baseline.     

Impact of high‐dose interferon induction and ribavirin therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C relapsing after or not responding to interferon monotherapy

Background/aims: Initial high‐dose interferon‐α induction therapy in combination with ribavirin improves sustained response rates in treatment‐naïve patients. This prospective, randomized, controlled study tested whether non‐responders or relapsers to interferon monotherapy also benefit from induction therapy. Methods: Patients with chronic hepatitis C who had not responded to (n=75) or relapsed (n=80) after previous interferon therapy were randomized to receive three different interferon doses during the first 14 weeks of therapy (A: 10 MU IntronA®/day for 2 weeks, followed by 10 MU/2 days for 12 weeks; B:5 MU/d for 14 weeks; C: 5 MU/2 days for 14 weeks) followed in all by 5 MU/2 days for 24 weeks. All patients received 1–1.2 g ribavirin/day throughout the whole study. Results: The rates of viral clearance at any time on treatment were similar in all groups. Sustained response rates were also not different among the groups in interferon nonresponders (A 32%, B 29%, C 31%) and relapsers (A 64%, B 68%, C 71%), respectively, as well as in patients with different genotypes. As expected, sustained response rates were higher in patients with genotype non‐1 than in those with genotype 1. Conclusion: High‐dose induction therapy does not improve the outcome of interferon/ribavirin therapy in interferon nonresponders or relapsers.     

Triple combination of interferon alpha-2b,ribavirin, and amantadine for treatment of chronic hepatitis C

Retreatment of interferon-resistant chronic hepatitis C represents a significant clinical challenge. In an open-label, pilot study, the safety and efficacy of interferon alpha-2b, ribavirin, and amantadine were assessed. Twenty patients with chronic hepatitis C who had previously failed to respond to a course of interferon monotherapy followed by a course of combination therapy (10 patients received interferon alpha-2b [3 million units three times a week] plus ribavirin [800 mg/d] and 10 patients received interferon alpha-2b [3 million units three times a week] plus amantadine [200 mg/d]) were enrolled in this retreatment protocol. One month after discontinuation of their last regimen, patients started treatment with interferon alpha-2b (3 million units three times a week), ribavirin (1,000-1,200 mg/d), and amantadine (200 mg/d). Biochemical and virologic end points were monitored. Patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels of <100 copies/mL at the end of 24 weeks of therapy completed a 48-week course of interferon alpha-2b, ribavirin, and amantadine treatment. Of the enrolled subjects, 60% were male, 85% were white, 85% had HCV genotype 1, and 20% had histologic cirrhosis. The mean age +/- SD of the patients was 44.1 +/- 4.9 years, the mean baseline HCV RNA level +/- SD was 1,845,150 +/- 1,279,069 copies/mL, and the mean baseline alanine aminotransferase level +/- SD was 130 +/- 100 U/L. Five patients (25%) became HCV RNA negative (<100 copies/mL) after 24 weeks of treatment, with only three patients (15%) remaining HCV RNA negative at the end of 48 weeks of treatment. This end of treatment response was sustained 6 months after the discontinuation of treatment in only two patients (10%). In this interferon-resistant group, a treatment regimen of interferon alpha-2b, ribavirin, and amantadine was associated with only a 10% sustained viral eradication rate.     

Efficacy of a short-term ribavirin plus interferon alpha combination therapy followed by interferon alpha alone in previously untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C: a randomized multicenter trial

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy with interferon alpha (IFNalpha) plus ribavirin has been shown to improve the sustained response rate in patients with chronic hepatitis C but there is little information regarding the lengths of time for this therapeutic regimen. In this study we therefore tried to evaluate whether the analysis of different virological parameters could provide new clues with respect to the early determination of the efficacy of this form of combination therapy. Furthermore, we also examined whether short-term induction combination therapy followed by IFNalpha alone is more effective than monotherapy in mounting an initial as well as a sustained virological response. METHODS: 185 patients with histologically proven chronic hepatitis C (mean age 42 years (range 19-65 years); 110 males, 75 females) were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to receive, over the first 12 weeks, either interferon alpha 2a 6 million units (MU) three times weekly plus ribavirin 14 mg/kg per day (n=93) or the same dose of IFNalpha alone (n=92). Patients with a virological response (serum HCV RNA undetectable) after 12 weeks were subsequently treated with 3 MU IFNalpha alone thrice weekly for a further 40 weeks. Otherwise, treatment was discontinued. After the end of treatment, patients were followed up for 24 weeks. RESULTS: Patient characteristics at baseline were not significantly different in the two treatment groups. An initial virological response at week 12 was seen in 61 (66%) patients receiving IFNalpha plus ribavirin and in 44 (48%) being treated with IFNalpha alone (p=0.015) and this improvement in the response rate was mainly restricted to HCV genotype 1-infected patients (58% vs. 38%). In contrast, end-of-treatment (week 52) and sustained virological response rates were similar in both groups (37% vs. 29% and 26% vs. 17% [p=0.1], respectively). Interestingly, patients with HCV genotype 3, however, clearly benefited from short-term combination therapy. Thus, sustained virological response rates in these patients significantly increased from 25% (IFNalpha monotherapy) to 59% (combination therapy) (p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term combined therapy for 12 weeks is more effective than the monotherapy with respect to the induction of an initial virological response but this effect applies only to genotype 1-infected patients. However, there is no significant difference between both therapeutic schedules with regard to the induction of sustained response. Although HCV genotype 3-infected patients seem to benefit from this short-term combined therapy, prolonged combined therapy may be necessary in HCV genotype 1-infected patients.     

Re-treatment of previous non-responders and relapsers to interferon plus ribavirin with peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD), ribavirin ± amantadine in patients with chronic hepatitis C: randomized multicentre clinical trial

Introduction. A large number of patients with chronic hepatitis C have not been cured with interferon-based therapy. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of amantadine combined with the standard of care (pegylated interferon plus ribavirin) in patients who had not responded to or had relapsed after ≥ 24 weeks of treatment with conventional interferon plus ribavirin.Material and methods. Patients stratified by previous response (i.e., non-response or relapse) were randomized to 48 weeks of open-label treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) 180 μg/week plus ribavirin 1,000/1,200 mg/day plus amantadine 200 mg/ day (triple therapy), or the standard of care (peginterferon alfa-2a [40KD] plus ribavirin).Results. The primary outcome was sustained virological response (SVR), defined as undetectable hepatitis C virus RNA in serum (< 50 lU/mL) at end of follow-up (week 72). Among patients with a previous non-response, 12/53 (22.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.3-36.2%) randomized to triple therapy achieved an SVR compared with 16/52 (30.8%; 95% CI 18.7-45.1%) randomized to the standard of care. Among patients with a previous relapse 22/39 (56.4%; 95% CI 39.6-72.2%) randomized to triple therapy achieved an SVR compared with 23/38 (60.5%; 95% CI 43.4-76.0%) randomized to the standard of care. Undetectable HCV RNA (< 50 IU/mL) at week 12 had a high positive predictive value for SVR. A substantial proportion of non-responders and relapsers to conventional interferon plus ribavirin achieve an SVR when re-treated with peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) plus ribavirin.Conclusion. Amantadine does not enhance SVR rates in previously treated patients with chronic hepatitis C and cannot be recommended in this setting.