The structural basis of αβ T-lineage immune recognition: TCR docking topologies,mechanotransduction, and co-receptor function

Self versus non-self discrimination is at the core of T-lymphocyte recognition. To this end, αβ T-cell receptors (TCRs) ligate ‘foreign’ peptides bound to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I or class II molecules (pMHC) arrayed on the surface of antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Since the discovery of TCRs approximately 30 years ago, considerable structural and functional data have detailed the molecular basis of their extraordinary ligand specificity and sensitivity in mediating adaptive T-cell immunity. This review focuses on the structural biology of the Fab-like TCRαβ clonotypic heterodimer and its unique features in conjunction with those of the associated CD3εγ and CD3εδ heterodimeric molecules, which, along with CD3ζζ homodimer, comprise the TCR complex in a stoichiometry of 1:1:1:1. The basis of optimized TCRαβ docking geometry on the pMHC linked to TCR mechanotransduction and required for T-cell signaling as well as CD4 and CD8 co-receptor function is detailed. A model of the TCR ectodomain complex including its connecting peptides suggests how force generated during T-cell immune surveillance and at the immunological synapse results in dynamic TCR quaternary change involving its heterodimeric components. Potential insights from the structural biology relevant to immunity and immunosuppression are revealed.     

Coevolution of T-cell receptors with MHC and non-MHC ligands

The structure and amino acid diversity of the T-cell receptor (TCR), similar in nature to that of Fab portions of antibodies, would suggest that these proteins have a nearly infinite capacity to recognize antigen. Yet all currently defined native T cells expressing an α and β chain in their TCR can only sense antigen when presented in the context of a major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecule. This MHC molecule can be one of many that exist in vertebrates, presenting small peptide fragments, lipid molecules, or small molecule metabolites. Here we review the pattern of TCR recognition of MHC molecules throughout a broad sampling of species and T-cell lineages and also touch upon T cells that do not appear to require MHC presentation for their surveillance function. We review the diversity of MHC molecules and information on the corresponding T-cell lineages identified in divergent species. We also discuss TCRs with structural domains unlike that of conventional TCRs of mouse and human. By presenting this broad view of TCR sequence, structure, domain organization, and function, we seek to explore how this receptor has evolved across time and been selected for alternative antigen-recognition capabilities in divergent lineages.     

T-cell allorecognition: a case of mistaken identity or déjà vu?

T cells bearing alphabeta T-cell receptors (TCRs) are selected by a subset of peptide-laden major histocompatibility (pMHC) molecules in the thymus and in the periphery and therefore are restricted to recognising host or 'self' MHC molecules. Nevertheless, T cells are inherently cross-reactive and often react with 'foreign' allogeneic MHC molecules (direct T-cell alloreactivity), manifested clinically as organ transplant rejection. Although the basis of T-cell alloreactivity has remained a puzzle to immunologists for decades, studies on alloreactive TCRs have begun to shed light on the basic mechanisms underpinning this 'mistaken identity'. Here we review recent advances in the field, focusing on structural and cellular studies, showing that alloreactivity may sometimes result from cross-reactivity without molecular mimicry and at other times may result directly from TCR interactions with allogeneic pMHC surfaces that mimic the cognate ligand.     

Structural basis for self-recognition by autoimmune T-cell receptors

T-cell receptors (TCRs) recognize peptides presented by major histocompatibility complex molecules (pMHC) to discriminate between foreign and self-antigens. Whereas T-cell recognition of foreign peptides is essential for protection against microbial pathogens, recognition of self-peptides by T cells that have escaped negative selection in the thymus can lead to autoimmune disease. Structural studies of autoimmune TCR–pMHC complexes have provided insights into the mechanisms underlying self-recognition and escape from thymic deletion. Two broad categories of self-reactive TCRs can be clearly distinguished: (i) TCRs with altered binding topologies to self-pMHC and (ii) TCRs that bind self-pMHC in the canonical diagonal orientation, but where there are structural defects or suboptimal anchors in the self-ligand. For both categories, however, the overall stability of the autoimmune TCR–pMHC complex is markedly reduced compared to anti-microbial complexes, allowing the autoreactive T cells to evade negative selection, yet retain the ability to be activated by self-antigens in target organs. Additionally, the structures provide insights into TCR cross-reactivity, which can contribute to autoimmunity by increasing the likelihood of self-pMHC recognition. Efforts are now underway to understand the impact of structural alterations in autoimmune TCR–pMHC complexes on higher order assemblies involved in TCR signaling, as well as on immunological synapse formation.     

Dynamic regulation of T-cell costimulation through TCR–CD28 microclusters

Summary:  T-cell activation requires contact between T cells and antigen-presenting cells (APCs) to bring T-cell receptors (TCRs) and major histocompatibility complex peptide (MHCp) together to the same complex. These complexes rearrange to form a concentric circular structure, the immunological synapse (IS). After the discovery of the IS, dynamic imaging technologies have revealed the details of the IS and provided important insights for T-cell activation. We have redefined a minimal unit of T-cell activation, the 'TCR microcluster', which recognizes MHCp, triggers an assembly of assorted molecules downstream of the TCR, and induces effective signaling from TCRs. The relationship between TCR signaling and costimulatory signaling was analyzed in terms of the TCR microcluster. CD28, the most valuable costimulatory receptor, forms TCR–CD28 microclusters in cooperation with TCRs, associates with protein kinase C θ, and effectively induces initial T-cell activation. After mature IS formation, CD28 microclusters accumulate at a particular subregion of the IS, where they continuously assemble with the kinases and not TCRs, and generate sustained T-cell signaling. We propose here a 'TCR–CD28 microcluster' model in which TCR and costimulatory microclusters are spatiotemporally formed at the IS and exhibit fine-tuning of T-cell responses by assembling with specific players downstream of the TCR and CD28.     

T-cell receptor binding affinities and kinetics: impact on T-cell activity and specificity

The interaction between the T-cell receptor (TCR) and its peptide–major histocompatibility complex (pepMHC) ligand plays a critical role in determining the activity and specificity of the T cell. The binding properties associated with these interactions have now been studied in many systems, providing a framework for a mechanistic understanding of the initial events that govern T-cell function. There have been various other reviews that have described the structural and biochemical features of TCR : pepMHC interactions. Here we provide an overview of four areas that directly impact our understanding of T-cell function, as viewed from the perspective of the TCR : pepMHC interaction: (1) relationships between T-cell activity and TCR : pepMHC binding parameters, (2) TCR affinity, avidity and clustering, (3) influence of coreceptors on pepMHC binding by TCRs and T-cell activity, and (4) impact of TCR binding affinity on antigenic peptide specificity.     

γδ T cells — innate immune lymphocytes?

It is unclear what the antigen recognition determinants of gammadelta T-cell receptors (TCRs) are. Compared with immunoglobulin and alphabeta TCRs, gammadelta TCRs have the highest potential CDR3 diversity generated by VDJ recombination. However, gammadelta T-cell reactivities seem to segregate with V gene usage, which has been taken to suggest that rearrangement has little role in generating different antigen specificities. During the past year, the CDR3 regions were found to determine the antigen specificities of T10- and T22-reactive gammadelta TCRs, a surface protein complex was identified as a ligand for human phosphoantigen-reactive gammadelta T cells, and the first co-crystal structure of a gammadelta TCR bound to its ligand was reported. These advances warrant a fresh look at gammadelta T-cell antigen recognition.     

The specificity of TCR/pMHC interaction.

Crystal structures of 11 complexes of TCRs with peptide/MHC (pMHC), that represent 6 independent TCRs, constitute the current structural database for deriving general insights into how alphabeta TCRs recognise peptide-bound MHC class I or class II. The TCRs adopt a roughly diagonal orientation on top of the pMHCs, but the identification of a set of conserved interactions that dictate this orientation is not apparent. Furthermore, the specific interaction of each TCR with its cognate pMHC partner is quite variable and also involves bound water molecules at the TCR/pMHC interface. In two of the systems, the structural basis for binding of altered peptide ligands has illustrated that the only significant conformational changes occur in the TCR/pMHC interface, but their small magnitude is inconsistent with the enormous variation in signalling outcomes. The TCRs adjust to different agonist, partial agonist and antagonist peptides by subtle conformational changes in their complementarity-determining regions, as previously observed in induced-fit mechanisms of antibody/antigen recognition. Alloreactive-complex structures determined or modelled so far indicate increased interactions of the TCR beta-chain with the pMHC compared with their syngeneic counterparts.     

Promiscuous peptide recognition of an autoreactive CD8(+) T-cell clone is responsible for autoimmune intestinal pathology

We have recently described a CD8(+) T-cell clone recognizing defined epitopes of both mycobacterial and murine hsp60 that are not sequence homologues. Adoptive transfer of this T-cell clone into T-cell deficient mice induced an autoimmune intestinal pathology. TCR analysis revealed the productive in frame rearrangement of two TCRa genes in this clone. Expression of two different TCR alpha chains by one T cell (dual TCR) is discussed as a potential mechanism underlying T-cell mediated autoimmunity. Here we addressed the question of whether hsp60 crossrecognition of self and non-self origin is directly linked to the surface expression of two TCRs by the same cell. Consequently, the potentially dual TCR of the hsp60 reactive T-cell clone was dissected into two single TCRs by double retroviral transduction of TCR deficient cell lines. Our data show that only one of the two TCR alpha/beta combinations formed a functional cell surface TCR and that post-translational allelic exclusion of the second alpha chain was achieved by the inability to pair with the TCR beta chain. Thus a single TCR is not only sufficient for crossrecognition with peptides that share minimal sequence homology, moreover this promiscuous TCR reactivity accounts also for immunopathology as recently shown.     

TCR repertoire evolution during maintenance of CMV-specific T-cell populations

During infections and cancer, the composition of the T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire of antigen-specific CD8⁺ T cells changes over time. TCR avidity is thought to be a major driver of this process, thereby interacting with several additional regulators of T-cell responses to form a composite immune response architecture. Infections with latent viruses, such as cytomegalovirus (CMV), can lead to large T-cell responses characterized by an oligoclonal TCR repertoire. Here, we review the current status of experimental studies and theoretical models of TCR repertoire evolution during CMV infection. We will particularly discuss the degree to which this process may be determined through structural TCR avidity. As engineered TCR-redirected T cells have moved into the spotlight for providing more effective immunotherapies, it is essential to understand how the key features of a given TCR influence T-cell expansion and maintenance in settings of infection or malignancy. Deeper insights into these mechanisms will improve our basic understanding of T-cell immunology and help to identify optimal TCRs for immunotherapy.     

Flexibility in T-cell receptor ligand repertoires depends on MHC and T-cell receptor clonotype.

T-cell receptors (TCR) recognize peptides complexed to self-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. Recognition of peptide/MHC ligands by the TCR is highly peptide specific. However, certain TCRs can also recognize sequence-related and -unrelated ('mimicry') epitopes presented by homologous MHC molecules. Using two human, human leucocyte antigen-DR1 (HLA-DR1)-restricted T-cell clones specific for HA p307-319, we identified several diverse combinations of peptide-MHC complexes that are functionally equivalent in their ability to trigger T-cell stimulation. These findings demonstrate that a single TCR can productively interact with different peptides complexed to self- as well as non-self-MHC molecules. This extended reactivity is human leucocyte antigen (HLA) allele and TCR clonotype dependent, as the peptide repertoire recognized depends on the presenting HLA-DR molecule and varies among different TCRs that both recognize the HA p307-319/DR1 complex. Importantly, certain peptide analogues can completely change the HLA-restriction pattern of the TCR: T-cell recognition of the wild-type peptide that was absent in the context of a non-self HLA-DR molecule, was restored by complementing substitutions in altered peptide ligands, that could not be presented by the original restriction element. This mechanism may play an important role in allorecognition.     

The immunological synapse: a cause or consequence of T-cell receptor triggering?

The immunological synapse forms as a result of the tight apposition of a T cell with an antigen-presenting cell (APC) and it is the site where the T-cell receptor (TCR) is triggered by its antigen ligand, the peptide-MHC complex present in the APC membrane. The immunological synapse was initially characterized in the T-cell membrane as three concentric rings of membrane receptors and their underlying cytoskeletal and signalling proteins. The inner circle, or central supramolecular activation cluster (cSMAC), concentrates most of the TCR and CD28, and it is surrounded by the peripheral SMAC that is formed by integrins. Finally, the most external ring or distal SMAC (dSMAC) is where proteins with large ectodomains are located, such as CD43 and CD45, far from the cSMAC. This arrangement was initially thought to be responsible for maintaining sustained TCR signalling, however, this typical concentric bull's-eye pattern is not found in the immunological synapses formed with the APCs of dendritic cells. Interestingly, TCR signalling has been detected in microclusters formed in the dSMAC area and it extinguishes as the TCRs reach the cSMAC. Hence, it appears that TCR signalling and full T-cell activation do not require the formation of the cSMAC and that this structure may rather play a role in TCR down-regulation, as well as participating in the polarized secretion of lytic granules. Here, we shall review the historical evolution of the role of the cSMAC in T-cell activation, finally discussing our most recent data indicating that the cSMAC serves to internalize exhausted TCRs by phagocytosis.     

Extraordinary cross-reactivity of an autoimmune T-cell receptor recognizing specific peptides both on autologous and on allogeneic HLA class II molecules

A T-cell receptor's (TCR) recognition of a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-peptide complex (pHLA) is normally described as being restricted by the HLA molecule and specific for the peptide. This is, however, not always true. Several TCRs have been described, which cross-react with other peptides bound to the restricting HLA molecule. This phenomenon has been considered a variant of molecular mimicry and is suggested to be one of the mechanisms behind autoimmunity. The positive selection of T cells in the thymus imposes low-affinity recognition of the TCRs toward self-pHLA, which increases the probability of the TCR to be promiscuous by nature, and further implies that the T-cell repertoire contains TCRs prone to be autoreactive and thus able to induce autoimmunity. We present an autoimmune TCR showing extreme cross-reactivity to several pHLA comprising both own HLA class II restriction element and allogeneic HLA class II restriction elements in complex with both self-derived and microbially derived peptides. The existence of such a significant cross-reactivity in the context of distinct HLA-DR molecules might be more common among autoimmune TCRs than previously anticipated and potentially reveals a new way of designing altered peptide ligands for therapeutic use.     

Drug interaction with T-cell receptors: T-cell receptor density determines degree of cross-reactivity

BACKGROUND: Immune-mediated adverse reactions to drugs are often due to T-cell reactivity, and cross-reactivity is an important problem in pharmacotherapy. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether chemical inert drugs can stimulate T cells through their T-cell receptor (TCR) and analyzed the cross-reactivities to related compounds. METHODS: We transfected human TCRs isolated from two drug-reactive T-cell clones (TCCs) by PCR into a TCR-negative mouse T-cell hybridoma. The TCCs were isolated from a patient with drug hypersensitivity to the antibacterial sulfonamide sulfamethoxazole (SMX). RESULTS: The transfectants reacted to SMX only in the presence of antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Glutaraldehyde-fixed APCs, however, were sufficient to elicit T-cell stimulation, indicating a processing-independent direct interaction of the drug with the TCR and MHC molecule. The transfected hybridomas secreted IL-2 in a drug dose-dependent manner, whereas the degree of reactivity was dependent on the level of TCR expression. One transfectant reacted not only to SMX but also to related sulfonamide compounds. Interestingly, high TCR expression increased cross-reactivity to other structurally related compounds. In addition, SMX-specific TCR cross-reacted only with sulfonamides bearing a sulfanilamide core structure but not with sulfonamides such as celecoxib, furosemide, or glibenclamide. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the T-cell reactivity to drugs is solely determined by the TCR. Moreover, these results show that cross-reactivity of structurally similar compounds correlates with the density of the TCR. Stably transfected T-cell hybridomas may represent a powerful screening tool for cross-reactivity of newly generated sulfonamide-containing compounds such as celecoxib.     

A temporal and spatial summation model for T-cell activation: signal integration and antigen decoding

Commitment of T cells to cytokine production and proliferation requires sustained (up to several hours) T-cell receptor (TCR) signaling that is achieved through serial engagement. This article proposes a kinetic model, adopted from neurons, which is based on the local temporal summation of successive signals. This model offers an explanation for how signals originating from serially triggered TCRs are accumulated and integrated over the period required for T-cell activation, given that each TCR-evoked signal is rapidly lost. The principal innovation of this model is the suggestion that signaling intermediates produced by serially triggered TCRs are not simply sustained but are incrementally built up. Several phenomena related to T-cell behavior and self-nonself discrimination are discussed.     

A structural voyage toward an understanding of the MHC-I-restricted immune response: lessons learned and much to be learned

T cells that express clonally distributed αβ T-cell receptors (TCRs) corecognize antigenic peptides (p) bound to major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) and class II molecules (MHC-II). Extensive human leukocyte antigen (HLA) polymorphism enables HLA molecules from different haplotypes to capture an array of self- and microbe-derived peptide antigens that is fundamental to adaptive immunity. T cells developing in the thymus are selected for weak binding to self-peptide-HLA complexes generating a vast repertoire of clonally distinct T cells in the periphery. Indeed, diversity within germline loci and the finally assembled TCR genes, coupled with inherent TCR cross-reactivity, enables CD8⁺ T cells to survey the multitude of pHLA-I landscapes. Precisely how does the TCR ligate to pHLA-I, and how does knowledge of the detailed structural interactions inform immunobiology? A recent number of our structural studies concerning the TCR-pMHC-I axis, alongside others in the field, have provided insight into HLA-I polymorphism, pMHC-I flexibility, TCR bias, TCR polymorphism, maintenance of self-tolerance, T-cell cross-reactivity, and alloreactivity. Collectively, the data also provide an opportunity to address the structural correlates of MHC-I restriction. Here, we provide our perspective concerning these advances in the field. Although much key information has been gleaned, the structural data show that some of the key concepts surrounding the TCR-pMHC-I interaction remain controversial and unresolved.     

Crystal structure of a T cell receptor bound to an allogeneic MHC molecule

Many T cell receptors (TCRs) that are selected to respond to foreign peptide antigens bound to self major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules are also reactive with allelic variants of self-MHC molecules. This property, termed alloreactivity, causes graft rejection and graft-versus-host disease. The structural features of alloreactivity have yet to be defined. We now present a basis for this cross-reactivity, elucidated by the crystal structure of a complex involving the BM3.3 TCR and a naturally processed octapeptide bound to the H-2Kb allogeneic MHC class I molecule. A distinguishing feature of this complex is that the eleven-residue-long complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) found in the BM3.3 TCR alpha chain folds away from the peptide binding groove and makes no contact with the bound peptide, the latter being exclusively contacted by the BM3.3 CDR3 beta. Our results formally establish that peptide-specific, alloreactive TCRs interact with allo-MHC in a register similar to the one they use to contact self-MHC molecules.     

T cell receptor engagement of peptide-major histocompatibility complex class I does not modify CD8 binding

Activation of cytotoxic T cells is initiated by engagement of the T-cell receptor (TCR) with peptide-major histocompatibility class I complexes (pMHCI). The CD8 co-receptor also binds to pMHCI, but at a distinct site, and allows the potential for tripartite TCR/pMHCI/CD8 interactions, which can increase T cell antigen sensitivity. There has been a substantial interest in the effect of the pMHCI/CD8 interaction upon TCR/pMHCI engagement, and several conflicting studies have examined this event, using the soluble extracellular domains of CD8 and the TCR, by surface plasmon resonance. However, the evidence to date suggests that the TCR engages cognate pMHCI before CD8 recruitment, so the question of whether TCR engagement alters CD8 binding is likely to be more relevant to the biological order of T cell antigen encounter. Here, we have examined the binding of CD8 to several variants of the HLA A2-restricted telomerase(540-548) antigen (ILAKFLHWL) and the HLA A2-restricted NY-ESO-1(157-165) antigen (SLLMWITQC) that bind to their cognate TCRs with distinct affinities and kinetics. These interactions represent a range of agonists that exhibit different CD8 dependency for activation of their respective T cells. By using engineered affinity enhanced TCRs to these ligands, which have extended off-rates of approximately 1h compared to seconds for the wildtype TCRs, we have examined pMHCI/CD8 binding before and during TCR-engagement. Here we show that the binding of the extracellular domain of the TCR to pMHCI does not transmit structural changes to the pMHCI-CD8 binding site that would alter the subsequent pMHCI/CD8 interaction.