Clinical efficacy of Apomorphine SL in erectile dysfunction of diabetic men

Although subgroup analyses from large randomised premarketing studies have shown that Apomorphine SL enhances the percentage of erections firm enough for sexual intercourse in diabetic men, the clinical role of the drug in this patient population remains to be elucidated. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of Apomorphine SL in diabetic males with erectile dysfunction (ED) and to identify factors predicting those who may benefit from the treatment. A total of 130 diabetic patients were randomised to receive either four tablets of 3 mg Apomorphine or a matching placebo. Assessments of efficacy comprised the erectile function (EF) domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and the one-item global efficacy question (GEQ). Patients with both a positive response to the GEQ and an improvement of at least 5 points in the EF domain of the IIEF were considered responders and subanalysed by several parameters indicative of the severity of both ED and diabetes. Response rate was 17% after placebo and 22% after Apomorphine SL. The EF domain of the IIEF and both questions 3 and 4 scores did not significantly improve in either of the two arms over the baseline. A younger age and a lower Hb1Ac were significantly linked to the status of responder in the Apomorphine arm. Apomorphine SL failed to show a statistically significant benefit over a placebo, but 22% of patients had a clinically significant erectile response. These figures seem to suggest that the drug has a limited use for ED diabetic patients.     

Therapeutic effect of combination of alagebrium (ALT-711) and sildenafil on erectile function in diabetic rats

Recently, the relationship between advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and erectile dysfunction (ED) has been reported. The present study aimed to investigate whether a combination of an AGE cross-link breaker (alagebrium/ALT-711) and sildenafil could enhance the erectile capacity in streptozotocin (STZ) diabetic rats. Additionally, we assessed the effect of that treatment option on some molecules that have been suggested to have crucial roles in AGE-related ED pathways. Four groups of animals were utilized: (1) age-matched control rats, (2) STZ-induced diabetic rats (40 mg kg(-1) i.p.), (3) STZ rats+sildenafil (5 mg kg(-1) p.o.), (4) STZ rats treated with a combination of sildenafil (5 mg kg(-1) p.o)+alagebrium/ALT-711 (10 mg kg(-1) p.o.) for the final 1 month of the 2 months of diabetes period. At 2 months after i.p. injection of STZ, all animals underwent cavernosal nerve stimulation (CNS) to assess erectile function. Penile tissue AGEs, MDA (malondialdehyde), cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) (ELISA), endothelial nitric oxide (NO) synthase (eNOS), inducible NO synthase (iNOS) (western blot), nuclear factor (NF)-κB, mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase (immunohistochemistry) and apoptosis (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick-end labeling) analyses were performed in all groups of rats. STZ diabetic rats had a significant decrease in erectile function as determined by the peak intracavernosal pressure (ICP) and total ICP (area under the erectile curve) after CNS when compared with control rats (P<0.05). The increase in both ICP and area under the erectile curve of STZ diabetic rats treated with a combination of sildenafil+alagebrium/ALT-711 as well as in STZ diabetic rats treated with sildenafil alone was significantly greater than STZ diabetic rats. Additionally, combination treatment decreased AGE, MDA, iNOS, NF-κB, MAP kinase and apoptosis levels, whereas it preserved cGMP contents in diabetic penile tissue. Decreased AGE, MDA, iNOS, NF-κB, MAP kinase and increased cGMP levels at the combination (sildenafil+alagebrium/ALT-711) therapy group increased both the peak ICP and total ICP to CNS in the STZ diabetic rats, which was similar to the response observed in control rats. These results may explain the role of AGEs in diabetes-related ED and the effect of an AGE cross-link breaker alagebrium/ALT-711+sildenafil therapy on some critical molecules related to AGE-related ED pathways.     

伐地那非治疗老年糖尿病性勃起功能障碍疗效分析

目的:观察伐地那非治疗老年糖尿病(DM)性勃起功能障碍(ED)患者的临床疗效和安全性。方法:选择男性科门诊100例老年ED患者,其中DMED40例,非DMED60例。2组均使用伐地那非,首次剂量20mg,以后维持剂量10mg,1次/周,连续8周。采用国际勃起功能问卷勃起功能评分(IIEF-5)和勃起质量量表问卷(EQS)对患者勃起功能状况进行评估。结果:治疗前后,DMED组患者IIEF-5和EQS评分值分别为(8.1±0.5)分,(18.9±0.2)分(P<0.01);(9.1±1.3)分,(25.1±1.4)分(P<0.01);非DMED组患者评分值分别为(10.1±0.3)分,(21.1±0.2)分(P<0.01),(10.1±1.7)分,(34.2±1.2)分(P<0.01),2组间统计学处理差异有显著性(P<0.05)。DMED组显效17例(42.5%),有效9例(22.5%),总有效率65%。非DMED组显效28例(46.7%),有效16例(26.7%),总有效率73.3%。DMED和非DMED2组间统计学处理差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论:伐地那非治疗能显著改善老年DMED患者的勃起能力,提高生活质量。     

Prognostic factors predicting successful response to sildenafil after radical cystoprostatectomy

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate in the management of erectile dysfunction (ED) following radical cystectomy (RC) and to define the different prognostic factors predicting the response to sildenafil in such a challenging group of patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred patients with ED following RC participated in an open-label, non-randomized, prospective, dose-escalation study. The median age of the patients was 53 years and the mean period after RC was 80.7 +/- 54.8 months. The study duration was 12 weeks, comprising a 4-week run-in period followed by two active treatment periods of 4 weeks each with 50 and 100 mg of sildenafil. Patients were assessed by means of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire at baseline and after each treatment period. At the end of the study, the Global Efficacy Assessment Question was used to evaluate treatment satisfaction. Factors affecting the patient's response to sildenafil were assessed by means of uni- and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The entire study group was suffering from severe ED at baseline, with a mean erectile function (EF) domain score of 6.5 +/- 0.93. EF scores improved to 12.2 +/- 7.76 and 18 +/- 10.3 with 50 and 100 mg of sildenafil, respectively. Sildenafil therapy significantly improved the ability of many patients to achieve and maintain an erection. The mean scores for question 3 of the IIEF were 1 +/- 0.14, 2.1 +/- 1.4 and 3 +/- 1.8 at baseline and with 50 and 100 mg of sildenafil, respectively, while the corresponding scores for question 4 were 1 +/- 0.10, 1.9 +/- 1.35 and 3 +/- 1.85. The satisfaction rate was 54%. The response was dose-dependent but the incidence of adverse effects increased from 6% with 50 mg of sildenafil to 34% with 100 mg. In univariate analysis, tumor histology and grade and postoperative partial tumescence were found to significantly impact the patient's response to sildenafil. In multivariate analysis, postoperative partial tumescence was the only independent predictive variable. CONCLUSIONS. Sildenafil was found to be a safe and satisfactory treatment for post-RC ED. The effect was dose-related. Patients with postoperative partial tumescence were the best responders.     

万艾可治疗老年糖尿病性勃起功能障碍疗效分析

目的:观察万艾可治疗我国老年糖尿病性勃起功能障碍患者的临床安全性和疗效。方法:用国际勃起功能问卷的勃起功能评分、性生活日记的问题2及问题3和总体评价问卷评估452例患者服用万艾可前后勃起功能状况。结果:服药后,患者的国际勃起功能问卷的勃起功能评分提高程度、性生活日记问题2和问题3作肯定回答的患者百分率,以及总体评价问卷回答百分率均显著高于基线值,统计学分析差异有极显著性(P<0.01)。结论:万艾可显著改善糖尿病性勃起功能障碍患者的勃起能力,提高性生活质量。     

Efficacy and safety of sildenafil for treating erectile dysfunction in patients on dialysis

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of sildenafil for erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients on haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD), as men with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) often have sexual dysfunction (up to 82% among those on chronic dialysis). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients with ED and in ESRD participated in an open-label prospective study. Thirty patients on HD and 11 on PD were asked to complete the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Fugl-Meyer life-satisfaction scale before and after sildenafil treatment. A total score in the erectile function domain of < or = 25 was accepted as indicating ED. All patients were started on a 25-mg dose, which was increased to 50 mg if there was no response after two trials. In addition, the overall efficacy question was used to evaluate satisfaction, and patients reported any side-effects during treatment. RESULTS: The erectile function and intercourse satisfaction domains improved significantly in both groups (P < 0.01). After sildenafil treatment, two-thirds of those on HD (20/30) and nine of the 11 on PD recovered their erectile function. The pretreatment scores on the IIEF and four domains (except sexual desire) of those responding were significantly higher than in those not responding (P < 0.05). The satisfaction rate on the overall efficacy question was 80% and 82% for the HD and PD groups, respectively. At least one side-effect was seen in 17 patients (43%); one had severe hypotension in the PD group. Overall, mild headache (seven patients, 18%) and flushing (12, 30%) were reported most often. CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil is a safe and satisfactory drug for improving erectile function in patients with ESRD. Patients were satisfied whether treated by HD or PD. Pretreatment scores on the IIEF may be useful for predicting the success of treatment.     

Clinical efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) in a multi-racial population in Singapore: A retrospective study of 1520 patients

BACKGROUND: Sildenafil citrate (Viagra), a selective inhibitor of cGMP-specific phosphodiesterase type-5, has been used as an oral therapeutic drug for erectile dysfunction. The present paper is a clinical study of the success rate and side-effects of the use of sildenafil in a multi-racial population in Singapore. METHODS: From April 1999 to May 2000, 1520 patients were given sildenafil citrate. Of these, 912 patients (mean age, 54.6 years; age range, 22-99 years) were followed up and evaluated for clinical efficacy and safety of the drug. The mean duration of erectile dysfunction (ED) and follow-up periods were 31.5 and 3.0 months, respectively. RESULTS: Satisfactory erections assessed by single global efficacy question (GEQ) occurred in 83% of patients, major side-effects in the form of flushing (3.48%), headache (1.97%), blurred vision (1.25%), giddiness (1.18%), warmth (1.11%) and others (4.92%) were recorded in 127 patients (13.9%). Racially, Chinese men with ED had higher efficacy (85.7%), compared to Indian men (74.2%) and Malay men (72.8%). With respect to comorbid profiles, an efficacy of 77.8% (n = 271), 83.9% (n = 292), 86.4% (n = 44) and 83.3% (n = 199) was recorded in diabetic, hypertensive, ischemic heart disease patients and in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients, respectively. Patients who smoked (n = 135) and drank alcohol (n = 118) showed an efficacy of 80%. Baseline hormonal profiles of luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, testosterone and prolactin did not affect the success rates of sildenafil citrate. Many patients had earlier received other forms of treatment (medicated urethral suppository for erection (MUSE; 84.9%); vacuum devices (86.8%), traditional medicines (100%) and other oral medications (89.2%)), but this did not influence the success rate of sildenafil citrate. But patients previously treated with prostaglandin-E intracavernosal injections were less successful on sildenafil citrate (77.3%). In the total cohort, 50 mg sildenafil citrate was an effective dose in 49% of patients and 46.5% patients needed 100 mg sildenafil citrate, while 4.1% of the total cohort needed only 25 mg sildenafil citrate. CONCLUSION: Oral sildenafil citrate has been shown to be an effective, safe and well tolerated drug in Singaporean men with ED, as in men from other parts of the world.     

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus

Sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor, has become a first-line therapy for diabetic patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). The efficacy in this subgroup, based on the Global Efficacy Question, is 56% vs 84% in a selected group of non-diabetic men with ED. Two novel PDE5 inhibitors, tadalafil (Lilly ICOS) and vardenafil (Bayer), have recently completed efficacy and safety clinical trials in 'general' and diabetic study populations and are now candidates for US FDA approval. A summary analysis of the phase three clinical trials of sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil in both study populations is presented to provide a foundation on which the evaluation of the role of the individual PDE5 inhibitors for the treatment of patients with ED and DM can be built.     

Sildenafil: A 4-year update in the treatment of 20 million erectile dysfunction patients

Sildenafil citrate, the first internationally approved and widely used oral agent for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), has revolutionized the treatment of ED throughout the past 5 years. This phosphodiesterase type-5 (PDE-5) inhibitor is selective for corpus cavernosum smooth muscle tissue and produces excellent erectile function. Its efficacy and safety over a wide variety of etiologies of ED and severities of ED demonstrates its usefulness in the clinical treatment of these patients. More than 20 million men have been treated worldwide with sildenafil with excellent results. ED caused by difficult-to-treat etiologies such as radical prostatectomy, severe diabetes, and spinal cord injury have demonstrated efficacy. Although sildenafil citrate, like all PDE-5 inhibitors, is contraindicated in patients taking nitrate medications for cardiac disease, it is effective and safe for those cardiovascular patients who are not taking nitrate medications. The incidence of adverse cardiovascular events in patients taking sildenafil does not differ from those of the general population. Investigations into the pharmacologic effect of sildenafil on coronary myocardial tissue further supports the safety of this medication. Sildenafil has been safe and effective in patients taking various medications including multiple antihypertensive drugs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, cardiac, and diabetic medications.     

Premature ejaculation in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients

Aim of the study was to assess the prevalence and to analyse risk factors for premature ejaculation (PE) in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes. A total of 676 male diabetic patients were enrolled in this study. Patients were screened for PE. At the screening time, patients were also interviewed for sociodemographic data that included age, education, occupation and marital status. Medical history included diabetes, duration of diabetes and diabetes-related complications. Clinical and laboratory assessment included body mass index and glycosylated haemoglobin. Mean age for the study sample was 53.4 +/- 10.4 years. The prevalence of PE was 32.4% in patients below 50 years, which increased to 67.6% in patients above 50 years. Of patients without PE, 31.4% were below 50 years compared with 68.6% above 50 years of age (p > 0.05). Patients with >10 years of diabetes were 2.7 times as likely to report PE as men with diabetes of <5 years (p < 0.05). Men with poor metabolic control were 9.6 times as likely to report PE as those with good metabolic control (p < 0.05). Patients without PE were four times as likely to have normal erectile function as those with PE (p < 0.05). There was a significant association between PE and cardiovascular diseases (p < 0.05). PE is common among diabetic patients. The study offers a quantitative estimate of the prevalence of PE and its main risk factors in diabetic patients.     

西地那非治疗合并勃起功能障碍的早泄病人的临床观察

目的 :评价枸橼酸西地那非对合并勃起功能障碍 (ED)的早泄病人的临床疗效和安全性。　方法 :45例诊断为合并ED早泄病人 ,以西地那非片可调整用药方案治疗 1～ 3个月。以阴道内射精潜伏期及配偶性交满意度来评价早泄治疗效果 ,并评估ED的总体疗效和治疗满意度 ,比较治疗前后的国际勃起功能指数评分 5 (IIEF 5 )。　结果 :早泄改善者共 2 7例 ,有效率为 6 0 %。勃起功能改善者共 40例 ,改善率为 88.88%。 2 7例早泄有效者均为 5 0mg西地那非改善了勃起功能的病人 ,且满意率为81.48%;18例早泄无效者中ED治疗满意率仅为 5 .5 6 %。在早泄有效者和无效者间比较其治疗前、后IIEF 5评分及增加值 ,差异均有显著性 (P <0 .0 0 1)。不良反应共 9例(2 0 %) ,均为轻度或中度 ,未经特殊处理即自行缓解。　结论 :对合并ED的早泄病人 ,枸橼酸西地那非片能安全有效地改善其勃起功能 ,如获得满意疗效多能使病人早泄得到改善。     

Efficacy and safety of oral sildenafil in men with erectile dysfunction and spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of sildenafil in men with spinal cord injury (SCI) and erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: Seventeen men with SCI were selected from February to September 1998 for sildenafil treatment of ED. The initial dose of 25 mg was increased by 25-mg increments as needed. Patients underwent baseline physical examination and answered questions from the abridged International Index of Erectile Function before and during therapy. RESULTS: Sixteen patients tolerated therapy; 1 developed hypotension and discontinued therapy. There was significant improvement in erectile function (P < .05) after 5.3 +/- 2.2 months when compared with baseline or previous therapies (P < .05). Of the 17 patients, 94% recommended sildenafil to others. Six of these 16 patients were available for long-term follow-up. There was further significant improvement in quality of erection (P < .05), but no change in satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Sildenafil is effective and well tolerated in men with SCI and ED.     

Sildenafil citrate: lessons learned from 3 years of clinical experience

In the 3 y since its initial approval, sildenafil has become the most widely used treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED) and has been prescribed to more than 13 million patients worldwide. Significant improvements in erectile function have been demonstrated in double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in diverse patient populations. A significant treatment effect has been shown with sildenafil in men with ED and a history of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, minor depression, spinal cord injury and multiple sclerosis. In addition, promising results have been shown in patients with treated prostate cancer, end-stage renal disease, Parkinson's disease and spina bifida and in multiple-organ transplant recipients. Postmarketing data of the use of sildenafil in clinical practice confirm the efficacy and safety found in clinical trials and high satisfaction with treatment. Public awareness of the common occurrence of ED and the high likelihood of a potentially favorable response to an oral treatment increased dramatically with the introduction of sildenafil. Physicians, however, are still not comfortable with ED management, which negatively affects pharmacotherapy response rates and patients' compliance to treatment. Continuing medical education seems mandatory to overcome existing problems in ED management.     

Post-marketing surveillance study of the safety and efficacy of sildenafil prescribed in primary care to erectile dysfunction patients

In order to investigate the safety and efficacy of sildenafil prescribed in primary care, a post-marketing surveillance study was undertaken. A total of 651 men with erectile dysfunction (ED) were enrolled from 31 family physicians in Korea from December 1999 to July 2002. Patients were regularly followed up to ascertain the safety and efficacy of sildenafil. Of the 651 patients enrolled, 572 (87.9%) returned for safety evaluation and efficacy assessment. In all, 458 (80.1%) of 572 patients reported improved erectile function with sildenafil. Hypertension, diabetes and low-dose sildenafil were associated with poor efficacy. A total of 71 adverse events were reported among 56 patients (8.6%), with the most frequent being hot flushes (5.6%), followed by headache (2.6%), palpitation (1.0%), anxiety (0.5%) and elevated ALT (0.5%). Only six patients (1.0%) discontinued sildenafil as a direct result of adverse events. These results suggest that sildenafil prescribed by primary care physicians was well tolerated and improved erectile function in patients with ED.     

Concomitant use of sildenafil and a vacuum entrapment device for the treatment of erectile dysfunction

PURPOSE: Men not entirely satisfied with erectile function after separate use of sildenafil or a vacuum entrapment device (VED) are usually given more invasive alternatives. This prospective study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of concomitant use of sildenafil and a vacuum entrapment device in men not satisfied with erectile function while using each of these treatment modalities separately. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 161 patients suffering from erectile dysfunction for at least 6 months were evaluated and treated with 100 mg sildenafil and a VED each as monotherapy. The 41 patients not satisfied with erectile function while using either modality alone were treated with concomitant use of sildenafil and a VED. The International Index of Erectile Function and global assessment question about satisfaction from treatment were used to evaluate satisfaction before and after each treatment. RESULTS: All 41 patients stated on the global assessment question that they had a greater level of satisfaction with the results of combined treatment than with each treatment alone (p <0.0001). Older (age greater than 60 years) participants reported better overall satisfaction. There was no correlation between treatment outcome and erectile dysfunction etiology or between satisfaction from treatments and the order in which they were given and the pretreatment scores for the International Index of Erectile Function domains. CONCLUSIONS: Combined use of sildenafil and a VED may be offered to patients not satisfied when either treatment is used alone.     

Efficacy, tolerability and satisfaction with sildenafil citrate 100-mg titration compared with continued 50-mg dose treatment in men with erectile dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and treatment satisfaction after initiating treatment with sildenafil 50 mg and later titrating to 100 mg, compared with continuing treatment with sildenafil 50 mg, in men with erectile dysfunction (ED).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicentre, parallel‐group trial was conducted in two 4‐week periods. In period 1, patients received 50‐mg doses of sildenafil single‐blinded for 4 weeks. In period 2, patients were randomized to double‐blind, placebo‐controlled treatment with sildenafil 50 mg or sildenafil 100 mg for 4 weeks. All patients were aged ≥18 years with a documented clinical diagnosis of ED (score of ≤25 on the International Index of Erectile Function, IIEF, Erectile Function, EF, domain), and met the prescribing criteria for sildenafil 50 mg and 100 mg.

RESULTS

Of 492 enrolled patients (mean age 53 years, sd 11), 476 (97%) completed period 1 and 473 (96%) completed period 2. Patients receiving sildenafil 50 mg in period 1 had an increase in the mean (sd ) baseline EF domain score from 12.8 (5.2) to 22.5 (6.6) (P < 0.001), and improved scores on the Quality of Erection Questionnaire (QEQ) and Sexual Experience Questionnaire (SEX‐Q). The IIEF EF domain scores were similar in the two groups at baseline and randomization. Patients titrated to the 100‐mg dose (237 men) showed a significantly greater improvement than those who continued on the 50‐mg dose (240; P < 0.001). There was a significant increase in QEQ and SEX‐Q scores in patients titrated to sildenafil 100 mg compared with patients continuing at sildenafil 50 mg. At either sildenafil dose, headache, flushing and hot flushes were the most common adverse events. Neither the frequency nor the severity of adverse events increased with titration to sildenafil 100 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

After initial treatment with sildenafil 50 mg, patients titrated to 100 mg showed further increases in efficacy and satisfaction with no increase in the number or severity of adverse events than in those remaining on the starting dose.     

Efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in men in Egypt and South Africa

The efficacy of sildenafil citrate (Viagra), an oral agent for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), has been demonstrated in global studies. This 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, flexible-dose study assessed the efficacy and safety of sildenafil to treat ED in men in Egypt and South Africa. Men with ED of varied etiology were randomized to receive sildenafil 50 mg (n=128) or placebo (n=126); doses could be adjusted to 100 or 25 mg. Questions from the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) assessing the ability to achieve (Q3) and maintain (Q4) erections demonstrated a significant improvement with sildenafil compared with placebo (P<0.0001). Improved erections were reported by 74% of patients receiving sildenafil and 27% of those receiving placebo (P<0.0001). Headache, dyspepsia, and flushing were the most common adverse events in sildenafil-treated patients. These results are consistent with clinical trials in other countries. We conclude that sildenafil is an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment for men with ED in Egypt and South Africa.     

Antioxidant treatment associated with sildenafil reduces monocyte activation and markers of endothelial damage in patients with diabetic erectile dysfunction: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the synergic effect of propionyl L-carnitine (PLC) plus sildenafil in reducing monocyte oxidative activity and endothelial dysfunction markers in diabetic patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: Thirty-two type 2 diabetic patients with ED (according to the International Index of Erectile Function-5 [IIEF-5]) were randomized to receive PLC (2 g/d) alone (n=8) or combined with sildenafil (50 mg/d twice weekly) (n=8), sildenafil alone (50 mg/d twice weekly) (n=8), or placebo (n=8) in a double-blind, fixed-dose study. Monocyte oxidative activity (stimulation index [SI]), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 [ICAM-1], P-selectin, advanced glycation end product (AGE) levels, Doppler sonography (recording peak systolic velocity [PSV]; end diastolic velocity [EDV]; systolic wave time [SWT]; resistive index [RI]), and IIEF score were evaluated before and after 12 wk of treatment; IIEF-5 was evaluated again 4 wk posttreatment. RESULTS: SI was reduced by treatment with PLC alone or combined with sildenafil (p<0.05). In patients treated with PLC plus sildenafil, a decrease in ICAM-1, P-selectin, and EDV values was observed compared with patients treated with sildenafil alone (p<0.05, p<0.01, p<0.001, respectively). IIEF-5 improved in all patients treated with PLC plus sildenafil or sildenafil alone (p<0.03, p<0.05, respectively). Four weeks posttreatment, patients treated with PLC plus sildenafil maintained the improvement of the IIEF-5 compared with patients on sildenafil alone (p=0.05). In patients on PLC treatment (with or without sildenafil), SI was correlated with IIEF-5 (p<0.001), glycemia with STW (p<0.03), and AGEs with IIEF-5 (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: PLC plus sildenafil was more effective in reducing SI and endothelial dysfunction markers in patients with type 2 diabetes and ED.     

Daily use of sildenafil improves endothelial function in men with type 2 diabetes

Diminished vascular endothelial function results in decreased vasodilator capacity and is associated with erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients afflicted with type 2 diabetes. The current study was designed to evaluate whether daily use of sildenafil could alter endothelial function and improve penile rigidity in a group of patients with diabetic ED. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective trial was conducted with 24 men with type 2 diabetes who were randomized into 2 groups: one receiving daily sildenafil (50 mg, n = 12) and the other placebo (n = 12) for 10 weeks. Erectile function was captured subjectively using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5), and endothelial function was objectively monitored via brachial artery flow-mediated dilation. Among the placebo and sildenafil groups, there were no significant differences in average patient age, time from type 2 diabetes diagnosis, duration of ED, or baseline IIEF-5 scores. Past medical histories, including smoking, alcohol consumption, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia, were also similar. At the conclusion of the 10-week trial, patients who received daily sildenafil had significantly improved erectile rigidity as captured by IIEF-5 (P < .001) and increased endothelial function via brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (P < .01). Endothelial function in men with type 2 diabetes was enhanced with daily sildenafil. Improved erectile rigidity and enhanced vascular circulation was noted after 10 weeks of daily sildenafil use.     

DOES SILDENAFIL COMBINED WITH TESTOSTERONE GEL IMPROVE ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION IN HYPOGONADAL MEN IN WHOM TESTOSTERONE SUPPLEMENT THERAPY ALONE FAILED?

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy of testosterone gel (T-gel) alone and in combination with sildenafil in hypogonadal patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 49 hypogonadal men (mean age 60.7 years) with ED participated for a mean of 20.2 months. Blood was tested for total and bioavailable testosterone, and prostate specific antigen. Sexual function was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire and a global assessment question (GAQ). Men received 1% 5 gm T-gel for 6 months, and 100 mg sildenafil was added to those with a "no" response to the GAQ after 3 months on testosterone supplement. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients reported significant improvement in the sexual desire domain (from a mean +/- SD of 4.2 +/- 0.8 to 8.6 +/- 0.4) and erectile function (EF) domain (from 13.6 +/- 1.9 to 27 +/- 0.8) following treatment with testosterone supplement alone. One patient was excluded from study after urinary retention developed and 9 reported irritation at the gel application site. In spite of normalization of total and bioavailable testosterone values, and significant improvement of sexual desire domain scores, the EF of 17 men remained less than 26 or they responded "no" to the GAQ. These men received combined T-gel and sildenafil, after which all graded EF greater than 26 and responded positively to the GAQ. CONCLUSIONS: Combined treatment with sildenafil and T-gel has a beneficial effect on ED in hypogonadal patients in whom treatment with testosterone supplement alone failed.