5FU infusion with mitomycin-C versus 5 FU infusion with methyl-CCNU in the treatment of advanced colon cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group Study.

The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) in a randomized trial evaluated 5FU infusions in combination with either Mitomycin-C or Methyl-CCNU in patients with disseminated large bowel cancer. A response rate of 18% was noted on the 5FU-Mitomycin limb as compared to 16% on the Methyl-CCNU arm (p = .39). Median survival for all treated patients was 43 weeks on both arms. Myelosuppression was found to be more significant on the Mitomycin-C arm. Regression analysis demonstrated that performance status, sex, and primary site were significant pretreatment characteristics for predicting survival. The response rates associated with this burdensome method of 5FU administration in combination with either Mitomycin-C or Methyl-CCNU appear to offer little advantage over bolus 5FU alone.     

A randomized trial of fluorouracil and folinic acid in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma

We determined the therapeutic effect of fluorouracil (5-FU) in combination with folinic acid (FA) in patients with measurable recurrent or metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum by comparing it to standard 5-FU therapy in a prospective randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized to receive either FA, 200 mg/m2/d for five consecutive days, or nothing. All patients received 5-FU, 370 mg/m2/d for five days on the first course, with subsequent dose modifications to maintain equal toxicity in the two arms. One hundred thirty patients were entered on trial and only five were excluded from the analysis because they did not meet the eligibility criteria or they refused therapy after randomization. The two treatment arms were balanced for 11 clinical characteristics. Patients were evaluated for response at the end of every two treatment courses and toxicity after every course of therapy. Median follow-up was 1.45 years. Dose-limiting toxicity was mucositis and diarrhea on this treatment schedule, although neutropenia was apparent. The response rate was 33% (21 of 63 patients) in the 5-FU and FA arm and was 7% (four of 61 patients) in the 5-FU arm (P less than .0005). Time to disease progression was significantly different in the combination arm as compared with the single-agent arm (P = .023). Overall survival was significantly longer for patients treated with 5-FU and FA as compared with those receiving 5-FU alone (P = .05). The median survival was 12.6 months for patients receiving the combination, and 9.6 months for those receiving 5-FU alone. Our results indicate that the combination of 5-FU and FA is effective treatment for patients with metastatic or recurrent carcinoma of the rectum and colon who have not received prior chemotherapy.     

Randomised trial comparing three different schedules of infusional 5FU and raltitrexed alone as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Final results of the Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD) 9601 trial

LV5FU2 with high-dose leucovorin (LV), weekly infusional 5-fluorouracil (5FU) (AIO schedule) and raltitrexed have been demonstrated to be active agents in first-line treatment of colorectal cancer. We performed a 4-arm randomised trial to compare (1) a low-dose intravenous bolus of LV (20 mg/m2), followed by an intravenous bolus of 5FU (400 mg/m2), followed by a 22-hour continuous infusion of 5FU (600 mg/m2) on day 1 and day 2/2 weeks (ldLV5FU2 arm), (2) a weekly continuous infusion of high-dose 5FU (2.6 g/m2/week) for 6 weeks followed by a rest week (HD-FU arm) and (3) raltitrexed (Tomudex arm; 3 mg/m2/3 weeks) to standard LV5FU2. From 1997 to 2001, 294 patients were included. The 4 arms were well balanced for sex ratio, age, WHO performance status, the primary tumour site and prior adjuvant chemotherapy. Treatment was stopped due to low accrual. Two toxicity-related deaths were observed in the Tomudex arm. The treatments gave rise to different rates of grade 3-4 neutropenia (3, 4, 11 and 14% of the patients in the LV5FU2, ldLV5FU2, HD-FU and Tomudex arms, respectively, p = 0.028), leucopenia and vomiting. At least one episode of grade 3-4 toxicity was observed in 27, 25, 38 and 47% of the patients in the LV5FU2, ldLV5FU2, HD-FU and Tomudex arms, respectively (p = 0.016). An objective response was observed in 28, 21, 22 and 10% of the patients in the LV5FU2, ldLV5FU2, HD-FU and Tomudex arms, respectively (p = 0.04). Progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients in the Tomudex arm was statistically lower compared to that of patients treated with LV5FU2 or ldLV5FU2 (combined group; p = 0.013, log rank test). In conclusion, Tomudex is more toxic and yields shorter PFS than infusional 5FU. Despite the early closure of the study and the lack of power of the comparison, it seems that ldLV5FU2 could be considered as an active, easier and less expensive option for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer compared to classic LV5FU2 or weekly HD-FU.     

A randomised phase II trial of weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil with and without folinic acid and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma: results of the 40955 EORTC trial

Previous small phase II trials have demonstrated that the combination of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and cisplatin(CDDP) could have clinical activity in metastatic biliary tract cancer. This randomised phase II trial was designed to assess the activity and safety of a high-dose infusional weekly 5FU alone (HDFU) and the combination of 5FU, folinic acid (FA) and CDDP. Patients were included if they had histologically proven locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract carcinoma, World Health Organisation (WHO) performance status < or = 2, bilirubin <2 x upper normal limit, adequate haematological and renal functions and had not received prior chemotherapy, even in the adjuvant setting. Treatments: Arm A (HDFU) consisted of cycles of 5FU 3 g/m(2) intravenously (i.v.), 24 h infusion, weekly, for 6 weeks, followed by 1 week rest, every 7 weeks; Arm B (5FU+FA+CDDP) consisted of cycles of 5FU 2.0 g/m(2) i.v. with folinic acid 500 mg/m(2), 2 h-infusion, weekly, for 6 weeks, followed by 1 week rest plus cisplatin 50 mg/m(2), once every two weeks, for 6 weeks, followed by 1 week rest, every 7 weeks. From February 1997 to June 1999, 58 patients were randomised (29 in each arm). Patients had a median age of 58 years in Arm A and 62 years in Arm B, locally advanced disease was present in 21% of the patients in Arm A and 11% in Arm B. WHO performance status of 0/1/2 was noted in 48%/45%/7% of the patients in Arm A and 54%/43%/4% in Arm B. In both arms, the most common metastatic sites were the liver and peritoneum. Twenty-eight patients were eligible in each arm and one patient did not start the allocated therapy in Arm B. The median number of cycles was 2 [range 1-12] in Arm A and 2 [range 1-6] in Arm B. Responses for the eligible patients who started their allocated therapy were as follows: Complete Response (CR) 0% in Arm A, 4% in Arm B, Partial Response (PR) 7% in Arm A, 15% in Arm B resulting in an overall response rate [95% CI] of 7.1% in Arm A [0.9-23.5%] and 19% [6.3-38.1%] in Arm B. Disease stabilisation was observed in 46% in Arm A and 44% in Arm B. National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) grade 3-4 adverse events (% of patients in Arm A/Arm B) were neutropenia 4%/26%, thrombopenia 0%/7%, stomatitis 0%/4%, vomiting 7%/14%, diarrhoea 0%/11% and neurotoxicity 4%/0%. There was one early toxic death in Arm B. The median overall survival (OS) [95% CI] was in Arm A/Arm B: 5.0 [4.0-7.4] months/8.0 [5.8-11.8] months and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.3 [1.7-4.7] months/3.3 [2.3-6.7] months. Cisplatin in combination with 5FU+FA showed a higher activity than HDFU, but was more toxic. These results are not sufficient to start a phase III trial. However, our group is planning a phase III trial comparing 5FU+folinic acid versus the same schedule+oxaliplatin a platinum analogue.     

A randomized phase II trial of irinotecan in combination with infusional or two different bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid regimens as first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Three different therapeutic regimens of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) were evaluated for efficacy and safety in the first-line therapy of advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenously either: CPT-11 125 mg/m(2), FA 20 mg/m(2) followed by 5-FU 500 mg/m(2) bolus, weekly for 4 weeks (arm A, Saltz regimen); or CPT-11 180 mg/m(2) day 1 then FA 200 mg/m(2) over 2 h and 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) bolus and 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) 22-h infusion on days 1 and 2, every 2 weeks (arm B, Douillard regimen); or CPT-11 350 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 43) alternating with FA 20 mg/m(2)/day followed by 5-FU bolus 425 mg/m(2)/day during 5 days (days 22-26) (arm C, Mayo Clinic regimen). RESULTS: A total of 154 patients were included in the study (arm A, 51 patients; arm B, 53; arm C, 50). Overall response rates for the intention-to-treat populations were 33% [95% confidence interval (CI) 21% to 48%], 42% (95% CI 28% to 56%) and 30% (95% CI 18% to 45%) for arms A, B and C, respectively. Median times to progression were 6, 8 and 7 months for arms A, B and C, respectively. Median survival times were 15, 12 and 17 months for arms A, B and C, respectively. Overall response rates for the evaluable patient populations were 40% (95% CI 24% to 58%) in arm A, 44% (95% CI 29% to 60%) in arm B and 31% (95% CI 17% to 47%) in arm C. Neutropenia was the main serious adverse event in arms A (30% of patients) and C (22% of patients) but occurred in only 8% of patients in arm B. Delayed diarrhea was the main severe adverse event for the three regimens, from 15% to 22%. CONCLUSION: All three regimens were highly active. The biweekly combination of CPT-11 and 5-FU/FA (arm B) was notable for its low incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia. The incidence of grade 3/4 delayed diarrhea was equivalent for the three treatment arms.     

5-Fluorouracil and folinic acid with or without CPT-11 in advanced colorectal cancer patients: A multicenter randomised phase II study of the Southern Italy Oncology Group

Purpose:The combination regimen CPT-11 plus bolus and infusion5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with high-dose leucovorin (hybrid regimen LV5FU2) hasbeen tested for activity and toxicity against advanced colorectal carcinomain a randomised, multicenter phase II trial. Patients and methods:A total of 102 chemotherapy-naïvepatients were randomised in a 1 : 2 fashion to receive: leucovorin 100mg/m² administered as a two-hour infusion before 5-FU 400mg/m² as an intravenous bolus, and FU 600 mg/m² as a22-hour infusion immediately after 5-FU bolus injection repeated on days 1 and2 (LV5FU2 regimen, arm A, 34 patients) or CPT-11 at 180 mg/m² (150mg/m² for patients of age 70 and <75 years) only on day 1immediately before LV5FU2 therapy (LV5FU2 + CPT-11 regimen, arm B 68patients). Both treatments were repeated every two weeks. The presence of acalibration arm assured consistency and more realistic evaluation of resultsachieved with the LV5FU2 + CTP-11 regimen. Results:Thirty-three and sixty-four patients were evaluable inarm A and B, respectively. The overall response rate was 18% in arm A(95% CI: 7%–34%) and 40% in arm B(95% CI: 28%–52%). Median time to progression,median duration of response and survival were similar in both groups.Responders (CR + PR) survived statistically longer than non-responders onlyin arm B (20 vs. 10 months, P = 0.0016). All patients were evaluablefor toxicity which was mild in both groups; gastrointestinal disturbances werethe most common. There were no treatment-related deaths. Grade 3–4toxicity was uncommon in both arms. Conclusions:The addition of CPT-11 to the hybrid LV5FU2 regimenprovided a significant overall response rate (40%) with relatively mildtoxicity. The overall response rate was 18% in patients treated withLV5FU2 alone in the calibration arm. Thus, considering other encouraging datafrom the literature, the CPT-11 + FU–LV combination therapy can beregarded as a new, very effective treatment option for first-line treatmentof advanced colorectal cancer patients.     

A randomized clinical trial with a weekly regimen of 5-fluorouracil with or without folinic acid in advanced gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas: a preliminary report

Eighty patients with advanced gastrointestinal tumors (64% with colorectal cancer) entered a phase III prospective randomized study with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) vs 5-FU + folinic acid (FA) The treatment included 5-FU, 600 mg/m2/week for 6 weeks, given as i.v. bolus alone (arm A), or administered by rapid injection half-way through a one-hour infusion of FA, 200 mg/m2/week for 6 weeks (arm B). Partial remission (PR) was achieved in 1 out of 30 (3%) evaluable patients for 6 months in arm A, and in 10 out of 34 (29%) patients in arm B, with a median duration of 8 months (range 6-17) (comparison of the response rate: P = 0.005). In patients with colorectal cancer the response rate was 5% and 27% in arm A and in arm B respectively (P = 0.06). Two patients, who were resistant to 5-FU alone, achieved PR after treatment with 5-FU + FA. Diarrhea was observed in 14/42 patients (33%) in arm B (grade 1-2 in 10 and grade 3 in 4) and in 2/38 patients (5%) in arm A (P = 0.005). Other side effects such as nausea/vomiting, myelosuppression and stomatitis were infrequent and of mild intensity in both arms. No statistical difference in survival was detected when comparing the two groups (estimated median survival 8 months and 11 months for arm A and arm B respectively). These results seem to indicate that the weekly regimen of 5-FU + FA has a superior response rate compared to 5-FU alone, and that it is well tolerated. However, the advantage is not reflected in overall survival.     

A Randomized Clinical Trial with a Weekly Regimen of 5-Fluorouracil with or without Folinic Acid in Advanced Gastrointestinal Adenocarcinomas: A Preliminary Report

Summary

Eighty patients with advanced gastrointestinal tumors (64% with colorectal cancer) entered a phase III prospective randomized study with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) vs 5-FU + folinic acid (FA) The treatment included 5-FU, 600 mg/m²/week for 6 weeks, given as i.v. bolus alone (arm A), or administered by rapid injection half-way through a one-hour infusion of FA, 200 mg/m²/week for 6 weeks (arm B). Partial remission (PR) was achieved in 1 out of 30 (3%) evaluable patients for 6 months in arm A, and in 10 out of 34 (29%) patients in arm B, with a median duration of 8 months (range 6-17) (comparison of the response rate: P = 0.005). In patients with colorectal cancer the response rate was 5% and 27% in arm A and in arm B respectively (P = 0.06). Two patients, who were resistant to 5-FU alone, achieved PR after treatment with 5-FU + FA. Diarrhea was observed in 14/42 patients (33%) in arm B (grade 1-2 in 10 and grade 3 in 4) and in 2/38 patients (5%) in arm A (P = 0.005). Other side effects such as nausea/vomiting, myelosuppression and stomatitis were infrequent and of mild intensity in both arms. No statistical difference in survival was detected when comparing the two groups (estimated median survival 8 months and 11 months for arm A and arm B respectively).

These results seem to indicate that the weekly regimen of 5-FU + FA has a superior response rate compared to 5-FU alone, and that it is well tolerated. However, the advantage is not reflected in overall survival.     

Interferon-alpha does not improve the antineoplastic efficacy of high-dose infusional 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid in advanced colorectal cancer: First results of a randomized multicenter study by the Association of Medical Oncology of the German Cancer Society(AIO)

Background: High-dose 5-FU given weekly as a 24-h infusion incombination with folinic acid (FA) has been associated withlow toxicity and a high response rate. Interferonalpha (IFN)either alone or in combination with FA has also improved treatmentresults by modulating 5-FU activity. We therefore initiateda randomized multicenter trial comparing the ability of FA orEFN to modulate infusional 5-FU. The statistical design usinga sequential analysis allows us to report on the comparisonof 5-FU/FA vs. 5-FU/FA/IFN while randomization of patients into5-FU/FA vs. 5 FU/TFN continues. MethodsChemotherapy-naive patientswith advanced progressive colorectal cancer and measurable metastaticlesions were randomized to receive 5-FU 2600 mg/m² i.v. as a24-h infusion, combined with either FA 500 mg/m² as a 2-h infusion(A), or IFN 3 x10⁶ U s.c. 3 x/week (B), or the combination ofFA plus IFN as in arms A and B (C). Treatment arms were repeatedweekly for 6 weeks followed by a 2-week rest period. These 8-weekcycles were administered until tumor progression. Because ofthe occurrence of 2 toxic deaths among the first 17 patientstreated in arm C, 5-FU was reduced to 2000 mg/m² for all patientsin arm C. Sequential analysis according to Whitehead for objectiveresponse was planned with     

A prospective randomized study of irinotecan (CPT-11), leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) versus leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma

The purpose of this study was to compare the activity and toxicity of an irinotecan (CPT-11), leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) combination with a standard regimen of 5FU and LV, in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. One hundred and sixty patients were randomized; 80 patients (group A) received LV 20 mg/m(2) bolus i.v. and 5FU 425 mg/m(2) bolus i.v. on days 1-5, every 28 days; 80 patients (group B) received CPT-11 80 mg/m(2) (30-90 min i.v. infusion), followed by LV 20 mg/m(2) bolus i.v. and 5FU 425 mg/m(2) bolus i.v. on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36, every 8 weeks. The overall response rate was 30% and 47.5% in groups A and B respectively. Progression-free survival was significantly higher in the triple-drug combination arm (median 7.5 vs. 4.5 months; p= 0. 0335). However, overall survival did not differ significantly between the two arms (15 months vs. 14 months for the groups B and A respectively; p=0.3531). The main grade 3 adverse events were diarrhea (19%, in group A vs. 35% in group B; p=0.032) and mucositis (2% vs. 14%; p=0.017). The regimen containing irinotecan showed activity in advanced colorectal cancer. The overall safety data confirm this combination as a well-tolerated treatment.     

Irinotecan combined or alternated with bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid versus the Mayo Clinic regimen in the first-line therapy of advanced colorectal cancer

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of two regimens of irinotecan, combined or alternated with bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA), and the Mayo Clinic regimen as first-line therapy for colorectal cancer (CRC). A total of 152 patients with advanced CRC were randomised, and 149 patients were treated intravenously by irinotecan 125 mg/m2, FA 20 mg/m2 followed by 5-FU 500 mg/m2 bolus, weekly for 4 weeks (arm A, Saltz regimen; n=46), or irinotecan 350 mg/m2 alternating with FA 20 mg/m2/day followed by 5-FU bolus 425 mg/m2/day for 5 days (arm B; n=53), or FA 20 mg/m2/ day followed by 5-FU bolus 425 mg/m2/day over 5 days every 4 weeks (arm C, Mayo Clinic regimen; n=50). Patients were analyzed for tumor response, time to progression, overall survival, safety and quality of life. The overall response rate for evaluable patients in arm A was 33% [95% confidence interval (CI), 17-49%], in arm B was 32% (95% CI, 16-49%) and in arm C was 26% (95% CI, 12-40%). Median times to progression were 7.9, 7.0 and 6.9 months and median survival times were 22.2, 17.0 and 18.2 months for arms A, B and C, respectively, in the intention-to-treat population. The main grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (7%, 39% and 12%) and diarrhea (6%, 21% and 18%). In conclusion, both regimens containing irinotecan were active and well tolerated in patients with advanced CRC.     

奥沙利铂单药或与氟尿嘧啶-甲酰四氢叶酸联合应用治疗晚期大肠癌Ⅱ期临床试用报告

目的：观察奥沙利铂治疗晚期大肠癌的临床疗效和安全性。方法：根据ＧＣＰ指导原则开展多中心Ⅱ期随机临床研究：Ａ组奥沙利铂单药１３０ｍｇ／ｍ２静脉滴注２ｈ,每３周一次;Ｂ组奥沙利铂１３０ｍｇ／ｍ２静脉滴注２ｈＤ１,加甲酰四氢叶酸钙（ＣＦ）２００ｍｇ／ｍ２＋５氟尿嘧啶３００ｍｇ／ｍ２静脉滴注４ｈＤ１到Ｄ５,每３周一次。治疗３周期后评定疗效,有效病例在４周后确认疗效。结果：共收入１１４例,在可统计近期疗效的１００例中,ＣＲ１例,ＰＲ２６例,ＳＤ３２例,ＰＤ４１例,总有效率２７０％。Ａ组３６例单药治疗有效率为１３９％;Ｂ组６４例有效率为３４４％。不良反应主要为恶心、呕吐、贫血和感觉神经毒性。对白细胞和血小板影响较小。结论：经考核奥沙利铂对大肠癌疗效和不良反应与欧洲的结果相近,和氟尿嘧啶合用疗效突出;多数病人耐受良好,是一治疗大肠癌有希望的新药。进一步考核,奥沙利铂和氟尿嘧啶联合有望成为治疗晚期大肠癌的首选方法。     

FDA drug approval summaries: oxaliplatin

The purpose of this report is to summarize information on oxaliplatin, a drug recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Information provided includes regulatory history, study design, efficacy and safety results, and pertinent literature references. A single, multicenter, randomized trial, enrolling 463 patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma whose disease had recurred or progressed during or within 6 months of completion of therapy with the combination of bolus 5-fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) and irinotecan, was submitted. Study arms included infusional 5-FU/LV alone (arm A), oxaliplatin alone (arm B), and the combination of oxaliplatin and infusional 5-FU/LV(arm C). Oxaliplatin, at a dose of 85 mg/m2, was administered to patients in arms B and C intravenously over 2 hours in 250-500 ml of dextrose 5% in water (D5W) on day 1 only. A 200-mg/m2 dose of LV was administered simultaneously to arm C patients, in a separate bag using a Y-line, or alone to arm A patients, by i.v. infusion, over 2 hours. 5-FU was then administered to arms A and C patients, first as a bolus injection over 2-4 minutes at a dose of 400 mg/m2, then as a continuous infusion in 500 ml of D5W over 22 hours at a dose of 600 mg/m2. LV was repeated on day 2 of the cycle (arms A and C) followed by a 400-mg/m2 5-FU bolus and a 600-mg/m2 22-hour infusion. Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks. Response rate was the prespecified end point for accelerated approval. Time to progression (TTP) was a secondary end point. The prespecified primary comparison was between the 5-FU/LV regimen and the 5-FU/LV/ oxaliplatin combination regimen. The three arms were well balanced for patient prognostic factors. There were no complete responders. The partial response rates were 0%, 1%, and 9% for the 5-FU/LV, oxaliplatin, and oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV treatments, respectively (p = 0.0002, arm C versus arm A). The median times to radiographic tumor progression, based on available radiographs, were 2.7 months, 1.6 months, and 4.6 months, respectively (p < 0.0001, arm C versus arm A). Common adverse events associated with the combination treatment included peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, and abdominal pain. Neutropenia was the major hematologic toxicity. Adverse events were similar in men and women and in patients <65 and > or =65 years of age, but older patients may have been more susceptible to dehydration, diarrhea, hypokalemia, and fatigue. Oxaliplatin in combination with infusional 5-FU/LV was approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum whose disease has recurred or progressed during or within 6 months of completion of first-line therapy with the combination of bolus 5-FU/LV and irinotecan. Approval was based on response rate and on an interim analysis of TTP. No results are available, at this time, that demonstrate a clinical benefit, such as improvement in disease-related symptoms or survival.     

A phase III randomised trial of LV5FU2 + irinotecan versus LV5FU2 alone in adjuvant high-risk colon cancer (FNCLCC Accord02/FFCD9802)

BackgroundThis multicenter adjuvant phase III trial evaluated the addition of irinotecan to LV5FU2 in colon cancer patients at high risk of relapse.Patients and methodsA total of 400 patients with histologically proven primary colon cancer with postoperative N1 detected by occlusion/perforation or N2 were randomised to: A—LV5FU2 [leucovorin 200 mg/m², 2-h infusion, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m² bolus, 600 mg/m² 22-h continuous infusion, days 1 and 2] or B—LV5FU2 + IRI (irinotecan 180 mg/m² 90-min infusion day 1 + LV5FU2) fortnightly for 12 cycles. Primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS).ResultsMedian follow-up was 63 months. Significantly more T4 tumours and 15 or more positive lymph nodes were observed in arm B. 5-FU relative dose intensity (RDI) was >0.80 for 94% and 77% in arms A and B, respectively (P < 0.001). Irinotecan RDI was >0.80 for 70% patients. There were more grades 3 and 4 neutropenia in arm B (4% versus 28%, P < 0.001). The 3-year DFS was 60% [95% confidence interval (CI) 53% to 66%] and 51% (95% CI 44% to 58) in arms A and B, respectively. No difference was observed [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.12, 95% CI 0.85–1.47, P = 0.42] even when adjusted for prognostic factors (adjusted HR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.74–1.31, P = 0.92). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 67% (95% CI 59% to 73%) and 61% (95% CI 53% to 67%) in arms A and B, respectively.ConclusionAdjuvant LV5FU2 + IRI compared with LV5FU2 alone in patients at high risk of relapse showed no improvement in DFS and OS.     

Phase III study of weekly high-dose infusional fluorouracil plus folinic acid with or without irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Group Study 40986.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate that adding irinotecan to a standard weekly schedule of high-dose, infusional fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (folinic acid [FA]) can prolong progression-free survival (PFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred thirty patients with measurable or assessable metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive either FA 500 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion and FU 2.6 g/m(2) by intravenous 24-hour infusion, both administered weekly for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Internistische Onkologie [AIO] arm, n = 216), or a similar schedule but with FU 2.3 or 2.0 g/m(2) preceded by irinotecan 80 mg/m(2) administered over 30 minutes (experimental group, n = 214). RESULTS: The median PFS time in the experimental group was 8.5 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 9.9 months) compared with 6.4 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 7.2 months) in the AIO arm (P < .0001). The median overall survival time was increased from 16.9 to 20.1 months (P = .2779). The objective response rate was 62.2% (95% CI, 55.0% to 69.5%) in the experimental group and 34.4% (95% CI, 27.5% to 41.3%) in the AIO arm (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: The addition of irinotecan to the standard AIO FU/FA regimen was associated with a highly significant improvement in PFS and response rate and was well tolerated. The results of this study confirm that irinotecan in combination with high-dose infusional FU/FA is a reference first-line treatment.     

The role of levamisole in the adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer patients: a randomized trial of 5-fluorouracil and levamisole versus 5-fluorouracil alone

Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and levamisole (Lev) have been considered standard treatment for stage III colon cancer patients. However, the uncertain contribution of Lev to the efficacy of treatment has led many oncologists to prefer the 5FU/leucovorin combination. To establish the role of Lev, we conducted a randomized trial comparing the 5FU/Lev combination with 5FU alone in patients with Dukes' C colon cancer. Patients with stage III colon cancer were randomized to receive 5FU alone (450 mg/m² IV bolus daily for 5 days and then, beginning at day 28, weekly for 48 weeks) or the same plus Lev (50 mg orally three times/day for 3 days, repeated every 2 weeks for 1 year). From December 1994 to March 1998, 92 patients were assigned to receive 5FU/Lev, and 93 were assigned to receive 5FU alone. Leukopenia and hepatic toxicity were more frequent in patients receiving 5FU/Lev as compared with those receiving 5FU (respectively, p=0.003 and p=0.039), whereas other toxicities were equivalent and mild in both arms. After a median follow-up time of 48 months, 80 patients have had recurrences (40 in each arm) and no advantages in terms of disease-free survival and overall survival could be demonstrated for the combination arm. The addition of Lev to 5FU does not seem to be relevant for the clinical activity of this adjuvant regimen, whereas toxicity related to Lev should be considered when an adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer patients is proposed.     

Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer with 5-fluorouracil and levamisole versus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer has been established during the past decade. From 1990 until recently treatment with 5- fluorouracil (5-FU) and levamisole (LEV) lasting 12 months was recommended as standard treatment. At the initiation of this study in 1993 improvement of adjuvant therapy was expected by the modulation of 5-FU with folinic acid (FA). Therefore, we decided to perform a prospective randomized multicenter trial to compare standard 5-FU/LEV to 5-FU/FA for either 6 or 12 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage III colon cancer after curative en bloc resection were randomized in 3 treatment groups: arm A (5-FU/LEV, weekly, 12 months), arm B (5-FU/FA, days 1-5, every 4 weeks, 12 months) and arm C (like B, 6 months). RESULTS: Between March 1993 and November 1997, 180 patients were randomized into the study, 155 were eligible for further evaluation. The interim analysis in November 2000 showed no significant difference for recurrence and disease-free survival in arm B and C, therefore the data from both 5-FU/FA treatment arms (B+C) were combined for comparison with 5-FU/LEV-treatment (A). Most pronounced toxicity in all treatment arms was mild nausea, loss of appetite and leukopenia. A tendency for more diarrhea and stomatitis was observed in arm B+C. After a median follow-up of 36.2 months no significant difference was seen for disease free survival (p = 0.9) and overall survival (p = 1.0). 3-year recurrence rates were 39.6% in arm A and 39.1% in arm B+C, 3-year survival rates amounted to 74.1% in arm A and 74.9% in arm B+C. CONCLUSION: Only a limited number of patients could be recruited in this study. The observed data support the results of other studies, which concluded that 6 months (or 12 months) treatment with 5-FU/FA is equivalent to 12 months treatment with 5-FU/LEV. Therefore the 6 months treatment with 5-FU/FA can be supported as standard for adjuvant therapy of stage III colon cancer.     

Treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinomas with fluorouracil alone, high-dose leucovorin plus fluorouracil, or sequential methotrexate, fluorouracil, and leucovorin: a randomized trial of the Northern California Oncology Group

We compared the effectiveness of fluorouracil (5-FU) alone (arm A), high-dose leucovorin plus 5-FU (arm B), and sequential methotrexate, 5-FU, and leucovorin (arm C) for treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinomas who had not received prior chemotherapy. Arm A consisted of infusions of 5-FU at 12 mg/kg/d intravenously (IV) for 5 days followed by weekly infusions of 5-FU at 15 mg/kg; arm B consisted of leucovorin infusions at 200 mg/m2/d IV plus infusions of 5-FU at 400 mg/m2/d IV on days 1 through 5 of a 28-day cycle; arm C consisted of methotrexate at 50 mg/m2 orally every 6 hours for five doses followed by infusions of 5-FU, 500 mg/m2 IV, and leucovorin, 10 mg/m2 orally, every 6 hours for five doses every other week. A total of 265 patients were entered into the trial, of whom 249 (94%) were fully evaluable. The objective response rate (complete [CR] plus partial [PR] responses) was 17.3% on arm A, 18.8% on arm B, and 19.8% on arm C (log-rank test, P greater than .4). The median time to failure was 138 days on arm A, 166 days on arm B, and 182 days on arm C (log-rank test, P values of arm A v B = .06; arm A v arm C = .04). Median survival was 345 days on arm A, 324 days on arm B, and 356 days on arm C (log-rank test, P greater than .4). Treatment with 5-FU alone was significantly more dose intensive and more toxic than either of the experimental combinations. The rates of grade 3 or greater nonhematologic toxicity were 42.3% on arm A, 24.3% on arm B, and 14.3% on arm C. Hematologic toxicity was milder but had the same pattern. This study indicates that these regimens of high-dose leucovorin plus 5-FU and sequential methotrexate, 5-FU, and leucovorin are not more effective than is 5-FU alone for treatment of patients with colorectal carcinomas when 5-FU is administered at high-dose intensity.     

Treatment of patients with metastatic renal carcinoma with a combination of subcutaneous interleukin-2 and interferon alfa with or without fluorouracil. Groupe Fran?ais d'Immunothérapie, Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer.

PURPOSE: Subcutaneous recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) and recombinant interferon alfa-2a (rIFNalpha-2a) have been used extensively in the treatment of metastatic renal cancer. Most results, coming from noncontrolled phase II trials, showed inconsistent rates of response. More recently, the addition of fluorouracil (FU) was proposed to improve the efficacy of these regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The role of a subcutaneous combination of rIL-2 and rIFNalpha-2a with or without FU was investigated. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a combination of rIL-2 and rIFNalpha-2a at weeks 1, 3, 5, and 7 or the same combination together with a continuous infusion of FU at weeks 1 and 5. The major end points of this multicenter, randomized trial were progression-free survival, response rate, and toxicity. Overall survival was a secondary end point. Tumor responses were reviewed by an independent committee. Analysis of the results was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one patients were enrolled. There was no difference in toxicity between the arms, and no toxic death was observed. One partial response was observed in arm A and five in arm B. Progression-free survival did not differ between the arms, and rates at 1 year were 12% and 15% in arms A and B, respectively. No statistically significant differences were detected in any end point. CONCLUSION: The subcutaneous combination of rIL-2 and rIFNalpha-2a with or without FU does not benefit patients with metastatic renal carcinoma. Neither of these regimens can be recommended as standard treatment. The results of the subcutaneous cytokine regimen seem disappointing.     

Phase II, randomized trial comparing bevacizumab plus fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) with FU/LV alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial investigated the safety and efficacy of two doses of bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor, plus fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) versus FU/LV alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred four previously untreated patients with measurable metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to one of the following three treatment groups: 36 to FU (500 mg/m(2))/LV (500 mg/m(2)) alone, 35 to FU/LV + low-dose bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks), and 33 to FU/LV + high-dose bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks). FU/LV was given weekly for the first 6 weeks of each 8-week cycle. RESULTS: Compared with the FU/LV control arm, treatment with bevacizumab (at both dose levels) plus FU/LV resulted in higher response rates (control arm, 17%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 7% to 34%; low-dose arm, 40%, 95% CI, 24% to 58%; high-dose arm, 24%, 95% CI, 12% to 43%), longer median time to disease progression (control arm, 5.2 months, 95% CI, 3.5 to 5.6 months; low-dose arm, 9.0 months, 95% CI, 5.8 to 10.9 months; high-dose arm, 7.2 months, 95% CI, 3.8 to 9.2 months), and longer median survival (control arm, 13.8 months; 95% CI, 9.1 to 23.0 months; low-dose arm, 21.5 months, 95% CI, 17.3 to undetermined; high-dose arm, 16.1 months; 95% CI, 11.0 to 20.7 months). After cross-over, two of 22 patients had a partial response to bevacizumab alone. Thrombosis was the most significant adverse event and was fatal in one patient. Hypertension, proteinuria, and epistaxis were other potential safety concerns. CONCLUSION: The encouraging results of this randomized trial support further study of bevacizumab 5 mg/kg plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.