Anatomy and function of the glenohumeral ligaments in anterior shoulder instability

The anatomy of the glenohumeral ligaments has been shown to be complex and variable and their function is highly dependent on the position of the humerus with respect to the glenoid. The superior glenohumeral ligament with the coracohumeral ligament was shown to be an important stabilizer in the inferior direction, even though the coracohumeral ligament is much more robust than the superior glenohumeral ligament. The middle glenohumeral ligament provides anterior stability at 45 degrees and 60 degrees abduction whereas the inferior glenohumeral ligament complex is the most important stabilizer against anteroinferior shoulder dislocation. Therefore, this component of the capsule is the most frequently injured structure. An appropriate surgical procedure to repair the inferior glenohumeral ligament complex after shoulder dislocation must be considered. In addition, a detached labrum can lead to recurrent anterior instability and a compromised inferior glenohumeral ligament complex. However, additional capsular injury usually is necessary to allow anterior dislocation.     

Static stabilizers of the shoulder joint

Anatomic dissection of 220 cadaver shoulders was performed to find out more about the static stabilizers of the shoulder joint. The static stabilizers, i.e. the glenohumeral ligaments, were always found to be present and strong in healthy shoulders. It was revealed that in anatomic preparations with all the organs removal except the synovial capsule, the capsule ligaments completely stabilized the joint. Anterior dislocation at 45 degrees of abduction was prevented by the superior and medial glenohumeral ligaments, while at 90 degrees of abduction the inferior glenohumeral ligament prevented dislocation. When anterior dislocation has occurred even the coracohumeral ligament must be ruptured. A new finding recorded is that the glenoid labrum is the origin of the inferior glenohumeral ligament and not a triangular static organ enlarging the socket and having a similar function to the menisci in the knee. This ligament is the most important ventral stabilizer of the humeral joint. With the conventional arthrotomy technique the medial and inferior ligaments are immediately cut through and therefore cannot be seen. The inferior glenohumeral ligament must be reconstructed in cases of anterior recurrent dislocation.     

The function of passive stabilizers of the glenohumeral joint--a biomechanical study

In a biomechanical study we evaluated the passive stabilizing ligaments of 9 fresh shoulder specimens with mercury bands. While preparing the specimens we found two interesting entities: there are fibers of the coracohumeral ligament running from the humeral head to the coracoacromial ligament and there was an reproducible thickening in the posterior joint capsule. Functional evaluation shows that the coracohumeral ligament limits external rotation independently of the amount of abduction as well as inferior subluxation. The mediale glenohumeral ligament shows the highest tension in external rotation and 30 degrees abduction. The anterior inferior ligament strengthens the joint capsule in abduction and external rotation. The posterior inferior ligament shows the highest tension in abduction and internal rotation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Immobilization in internal rotation and adduction may lead to shortening of the coracohumeral ligament, which may result in severe limitation of external rotation and abduction. Resection of the coracoacromial ligament relaxes the coracohumeral ligament leading to an increased cranio-caudal instability. The posterior inferior ligament is complementary to the anterior inferior ligament thus stabilizing the shoulder joint in abduction and internal rotation. Sparing this structure in arthroscopy with dorsal portals and restoring in the case of a rupture seems to be of value for a normal joint function.     

Release of the coracoacromial ligament can lead to glenohumeral laxity: a biomechanical study

The purpose of this study was to determine change in glenohumeral joint translation after release of the coracoacromial ligament. Six fresh, frozen unpaired glenohumeral joints were tested in a neutral position and at 30 degrees internal and 30 degrees external rotation of the humerus at 0 degrees, 30 degrees, and 60 degrees of abduction on a custom glenohumeral joint translation testing apparatus. A joint compression load of 20 N was simulated; then a 15-N load was applied to the humerus in anterior, posterior, superior, and inferior directions, and translations on the glenoid were measured with an electromagnetic tracking device. The tests were then repeated after a 1.5-cm section of the coracoacromial ligament was released from the acromion. A multivariate analysis of variance was used for statistical analyses with a P value of.05 as the level of significance. At 0 degrees and 30 degrees of abduction, release of the coracoacromial ligament resulted in a significant increase in glenohumeral joint translations, in both the anterior and inferior directions. In addition, the differences in translation between before and after the release of the coracoacromial ligament decreased in all directions as glenohumeral abduction increased, and they were not significant at 60 degrees of abduction in any of the rotations. The results of this study suggest that the coracoacromial ligament has a role in static restraint of the glenohumeral joint. It provides a suspension function and may restrain anterior and inferior translations through an interaction with the coracohumeral ligament. Although this is a biomechanical study without simulation of the shoulder muscles, it indicates that the coracoacromial ligament contributes to glenohumeral stability. Caution should be exercised in the release of the coracoacromial ligament in those with rotator cuff pain associated with glenohumeral instability.     

Periarticular neural elements in the shoulder joint.

Due to its unconstrained nature, the glenohumeral joint must necessarily have several mechanisms to regulate its position in space. The neural mechanisms associated with this positioning have not been fully evaluated anatomically. In this study, three fresh-frozen human cadaveric adult shoulders were dissected. Specimens were excised from the proximal biceps insertion, the superior, middle, and inferior glenohumeral ligaments, and the capsule superior to the glenohumeral ligaments. In two specimens, a portion of glenoid labrum was analyzed using a modified gold chloride staining method and light microscopy. A portion of mid-biceps tendon was used as a control. In the superior glenohumeral ligament, 45% of sections contained neural elements consisting of Golgi's, Ruffini's, and Pacini's corpuscles as well as free nerve endings. The predominant types were Ruffini's and Golgi's. The middle glenohumeral ligament sections revealed all four receptor types in 42%, with the most common elements being Pacini's and Ruffini's receptors. The inferior glenohumeral ligament specimens contained the four receptor types in 48% of sections, with Ruffini's, Pacini's, and Golgi's types equally distributed. The shoulder capsule specimens revealed Ruffini's and Pacini's receptors in 47.5% of sections. Only free nerve endings were identified in the biceps tendon and glenoid labral tissue. These findings suggest that the pattern of neural elements does not appear to be random in nature and may have some correlation with the specific functions of some of the glenohumeral ligaments.     

Arthroscopic glenohumeral folds and microscopic glenohumeral ligaments: the fasciculus obliquus is the missing link

This study tested the hypotheses that the folds in the inferior glenohumeral capsule appear at the borders and crossings of the underlying capsular ligaments and that embalming may result in misinterpretation of these folds as ligaments. The inferior capsular structures in 80 unembalmed cadaver shoulders were compared with 24 embalmed shoulders. During arthroscopy and dissection, an anteroinferior fold was more prominently seen in internal rotation and was almost obliterated in external rotation. A posteroinferior fold appeared in external rotation and almost disappeared in internal rotation. During dissection, the anteroinferior fold developed at the border of the anterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament (ABIGHL) and where this ligament crossed with the fasciculus obliquus (FO). Several patterns of crossing of the ABIGHL and the FO were seen that determined the folding-unfolding mechanism of the anteroinferior fold and the appearance of possible synovial recesses. The axillary part of the IGHL is formed by the FO on the glenoid side and by the ABIGHL on the humeral side. The posteroinferior fold was determined by the posterior band of the IGHL. The folds in the embalmed specimens did not necessarily correspond with the underlying fibrous structure of the capsule. The folds and recesses observed during arthroscopy indicate the underlying capsular ligaments but are not the ligaments themselves. The IGHL complex is formed by its anterior and posterior bands and also by the FO. Both findings are important during shoulder instability procedures because the ligaments need to be restored to their appropriate anatomy and tension. Because the FO may also be involved, Bankart-type surgery may have to reach far inferiorly. Midsubstance capsular shift procedures also need to incorporate this ligament.     

Determining the relationship of the axillary nerve to the shoulder joint capsule from an arthroscopic perspective

BACKGROUND: The axillary nerve is out of the field of view during shoulder arthroscopy, but certain procedures require manipulation of capsular tissue that can threaten the function or integrity of the nerve. We studied fresh cadavers to identify the course of the axillary nerve in relation to the glenoid rim from an intra-articular perspective and to determine how close the nerve travels in relation to the glenoid rim and the inferior glenohumeral ligament. METHODS: We dissected nine whole-body fresh-tissue shoulder joints and exposed the axillary nerve through a window in the inferior glenohumeral ligament. Then we cut coronal sections through the glenoid fossa of ten unembalmed, frozen shoulder specimens after the axillary nerve had been stained with Evans blue dye. All specimens were studied with the joint secured in the lateral decubitus position used for shoulder arthroscopy. RESULTS: Microsurgical dissection through the inferior glenohumeral ligament from within the joint capsule revealed the axillary nerve as it traversed the quadrangular space. In each dissection, the teres minor branch was the closest to the glenoid rim. The coronal sectioning of the unembalmed shoulder specimens demonstrated that the closest point between the axillary nerve and the glenoid rim was at the 6 o'clock position on the inferior glenoid rim. At this position, the average distance between the axillary nerve and the glenoid rim was 12.4 mm. The axillary nerve lay, throughout its course, at an average of 2.5 mm from the inferior glenohumeral ligament. CONCLUSIONS: We used two novel approaches to map the axillary nerve from an intra-articular perspective. Our analysis of the position of the nerve with use of these methods provides the shoulder arthroscopist with essential information regarding the location, route, and morphology of the nerve as it passes inferior to the glenoid rim and shoulder capsule.     

Intracapsular origin of the long head of the biceps tendon with glenoid avulsion of the glenohumeral ligaments

An 18-year-old woman presented with a history of recurrent glenohumeral dislocations involving her right dominant shoulder. Physical examination suggested physiologic hyperlaxity and anterior instability. Magnetic resonance arthrography demonstrated an anomalous intracapsular origin of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT), with normal-appearing LHBT in the intertubercular groove. Diagnostic arthroscopy confirmed the absence of the LHBT attachment on the superior labrum. Instead, the LHBT originated from the capsule of the shoulder joint. Diagnostic arthroscopy also revealed glenoid avulsion of the glenohumeral ligaments (GAGL) lesion as a tear in the anterior-inferior capsule near its insertion on the glenoid and labrum. An arthroscopic anterior capsulolabral repair was performed with rotator interval closure by imbrication of superior and middle glenohumeral ligaments. A retrospective review of the magnetic resonance arthrogram identified irregularity and interposition of contrast between the capsule and the anterior-inferior labrum that was reproduced in the abduction-external rotation view corresponding with the GAGL lesion seen at arthroscopy. At 12 months postoperatively, the patient demonstrated full range of motion and no signs of instability. This case report helps to raise awareness about 2 rare shoulder lesions: the anomalous origin of LHBT and the GAGL lesion. Diagnosing such lesions on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging may aid in operative planning and avoid unexpected intraoperative findings.     

Anatomy of the coracoacromial veil

The coracoacromial (CA) ligament plays an important role in the stability of the shoulder joint by limiting superior translation of the glenohumeral joint. This ligament is further divided into anterolateral and posteromedial bands. Attached to the CA ligament, a supportive structure was noted in some previous studies. The purpose of this study was to learn more about the anatomy of this structure. Twenty-eight shoulders were obtained. Deltoid and trapezius muscles were removed without damaging the rotator cuff and coracoacromial arch. The CA ligament was dissected further to reveal two constituent bands, an anterolateral and a posteromedial band. A connective tissue structure was noted between the posteromedial band, CA ligament, and rotator interval capsule. This structure was oriented as an L-shaped curtain, which the authors termed the "coracoacromial veil." Anatomical position of this veil provides a stabilizing link between the CA ligament and the rotator interval capsule. This structure potentially limits inferior translation of the glenohumeral joint.     

Variations in the superior capsuloligamentous complex and description of a new ligament

Although the rotator cuff interval and the adjacent ligaments are gaining interest because of their importance for glenohumeral instability and adhesive capsulitis, there seems to be some confusion about their anatomy. This study reinvestigates the superior capsular structures in 110 cadaveric shoulders by a combination of arthroscopy, dissection, histology, and functional analysis. The structure of the superior capsule was found to be more complex than suspected until now. The coracohumeral, coracoglenoid, and superior glenohumeral ligaments joined with a circular transverse band to form the anterior limb of a suspension sling. This was 9 to 26 mm wide at its midportion. In 90% of the specimens, there also was a posterior limb composed of a broad fibrous sheet, 6 to 26 mm wide at its midportion. This hitherto unrecognized posterosuperior glenohumeral ligament joined posterolaterally with the circular transverse band. Four types of configuration for the superior complex could be identified. The suspension sling formed by the superior complex functions in the same way as the hammock formed by the inferior glenohumeral ligament complex. The posterior limb seems to restrict internal rotation, like the anterior limb restricts external rotation. The expanded knowledge of the superior capsular complex increases the understanding of the pathology involved in anterosuperior and posterosuperior impingement, as well as articular-sided rotator cuff tears. It also has clinical implications for rotator cuff interval and biceps pulley lesions, because these areas are bordered by the anterior limb of the superior complex, as well as for adhesive capsulitis, where we can now understand why internal rotation is limited and why the release needs to be extended posterosuperiorly.     

Anterior shoulder stability: Contributions of rotator cuff forces and the capsular ligaments in a cadaver model

The purpose of this study was to quantify in a biomechanical model the contributions to shoulder joint stability that are made by tensions in the four tendons of the rotator cuff and by static resistance of defined portions of the capsular ligaments. A materials testing machine was used to directly determine anterior joint laxity by measurement of the force required to produce a standard anterior subluxation. Shoulders were tested in external or neutral humeral rotation. Data were analyzed by multiway analysis of variance with regression analysis. This model simulated tensions in the rotator cuff musculature by applying static loads at the tendon insertion sites acting along the anatomic lines of action. A load in any of the cuff tendons resulted in a measurable and statistically significant contribution to anterior joint stability. The contributions between different tendons were not significantly different and did not depend on the humeral rotation (neutral or external). In neutral humeral rotation the superior and middle glenohumeral ligaments together function equally with the inferior glenohumeral ligament as primary stabilizers against anterior humeral translation. The posterior capsule is a secondary stabilizer. The external rotation of the abducted humerus increases anterior stability by more than doubling the stability contribution from the inferior glenohumeral ligament. The stability contribution from the posterior capsule is larger in external rotation than in neutral rotation but is still of secondary magnitude. In external rotation the stability contribution of the anterior capsule, including the superior glenohumeral ligament and the middle glenohumeral ligament, becomes insignificant. The model presented here simulates the combined effect of two major sources of shoulder stability. This versatile model permits the direct measurement of the contributions to anterior shoulder stability that are made by tensions in the rotator cuff tendons and by static resistance of defined capsular zones. The use of multiple regression analysis-a standard statistical technique but one relatively new to the orthopaedic literature-permits quantitative determination of the contribution of each independent variable to the dependent variable, shoulder stability.     

Topographie und funktionelle Anatomie des Schultergelenks

The shoulder joint is the ball-and-socket joint that has the greatest degree of freedom along all three axes. It is secured by muscles. The glenoid cavity is flat and is extended by the glenoid lip. The surface area of the hemispheric head of the humerus is about three times that of the articular socket, even including the glenoid labrum. The joint capsule extends between the edge of the socket and the anatomical neck of the humerus. The capsule is flaccid and includes the labrum and the tendon of the long biceps head. On the ventral side the capsule is reinforced by the glenohumeral and the coracohumeral ligaments. The tendons of the rotator cuff muscles form the upper, anterior and dorsal reinforcements of the capsule. They are firmly linked to the capsule to prevent squeezing of the capsule during movement. The distal part of the capsule contains the axillary pouch. The axillary nerve supplies the main sensory innervation of the joint capsule, while the dorsal part also receives branches of the suprascapular nerve. The vast majority of sensory nerve endings are nociceptors. The specific mechanoreceptors are substantially fewer in number. Consequently, information about the position of the joint is obtained mainly by way of proprioceptors in the surrounding muscles. The nerve branches are accompanied by blood vessels originating from the anterior and posterior circumflex humeral arteries and from the suprascapular artery.     

The relationship of the glenohumeral joint capsule to the rotator cuff

The glenohumeral joint capsules of 23 shoulders in which the rotator cuff was not torn were studied by gross dissection and histologic methods. The cuff tendons were resected, leaving the intact capsule attached to the bones. This dissection method provided a unique overview of the capsule in situ and allowed the areas of cuff tendon and muscle attachment to be mapped. The capsule was found to be a continuous cylinder between humerus and glenoid. On approximately one-third of the capsule (the portion adjacent to the humeral tuberosities), tight insertions of cuff tendons were noted. The superior segment between subscapularis and supraspinatus contained the coracohumeral ligament. This segment appeared to reinforce the cuff through a transversely oriented band similar to the glenohumeral ligaments.     

Anterior glenohumeral stabilization factors: Progressive effects in a biomechanical model

The aim of this study was to evaluate the anterior stabilizing factors of the glenohumeral joint over a range of translations. The stabilizers examined included the capsular ligaments, the coracohumeral ligament, the rotator cuff muscles and the long head of the biceps. Simulated muscle forces were applied to eight shoulder specimens to produce 90° of total elevation of the arm in the scapular plane. Stability, defined as the force required to reach a specified subluxation, then was evaluated under varying configurations of capsule cuts, humeral rotation, and muscular loads. The overall force-displacement relationship of the subluxation was found to increase exponentially in external rotation to 239 N at 10 mm of displacement and to level off in neutral rotation to 172 N at 10 mm of displacement. Among the muscles, the biceps was the most important stabilizer in neutral rotation, providing more than 30 N of stabilization: the subscapularis provided the greatest degree of stabilization in external rotation, increasing to approximately 20 N. The subscapularis and supraspinatus were the most consistently important stabilizers in both types of rotation. In external rotation, the superior, middle, and inferior glenohumeral ligaments were the most effective ligamentous stabilizers, and all provided progressively more stabilization as higher displacements were reached. The stability provided by some of the ligaments reached nearly 50 N at 10 mm of displacement.     

Arthroscopic rotator cuff interval capsular closure

Closure of the rotator cuff interval is an important component of open stabilization techniques in shoulder surgery. This study describes a technique in which the deep layer of the capsule within the rotator cuff interval is closed arthroscopically. The effect of closure of this capsule within the rotator cuff interval on glenohumeral motion also is quantified. Sutures were placed from the superior glenohumeral ligament to the middle glenohumeral ligament and tied intra-articularly in fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders. Closure of the interval capsule resulted in statistically significant limitation of humeral elevation, external rotation, and extension. Arthroscopic closure of the deep layer of the rotator cuff interval capsule produced a visible superior shifting of the middle and inferior glenohumeral ligaments and imbricated the anterosuperior capsule of the shoulder. In addition, this procedure can be performed in conjunction with arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction.     

In situ force distribution in the glenohumeral joint capsule during anterior-posterior loading.

Our objective was to examine the function of the glenohumeral capsule and ligaments during application of an anterior-posterior load by directly measuring the in situ force distribution in these structures as well as the compliance of the joint. We hypothesized that interaction between different regions of the capsule due to its continuous nature results in a complex force distribution throughout the glenohumeral joint capsule. A robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system was utilized to determine the force distribution in the glenohumeral capsule and ligaments of intact shoulder specimens and the joint kinematics resulting from the application of external loads at four abduction angles. Our results suggest that the glenohumeral capsule carries no force when the humeral head is centered in the glenoid with the humerus in anatomic rotation. However, once an anterior-posterior load is applied to the joint, the glenohumeral ligaments carry force (during anterior loading, the superior glenohumeral-coracohumeral ligaments carried 26+/-16 N at 0 degrees and the anterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament carried 30+/-21 N at 90 degrees). Therefore, the patient's ability to use the arm with the humerus in anatomic rotation should not be limited following repair procedures for shoulder instability because the repaired capsuloligamentous structures should not carry force during this motion. Separation of the capsule into its components revealed that forces are being transmitted between each region and that the glenohumeral ligaments do not act as traditional ligaments that carry a pure tensile force along their length. The interrelationship of the glenohumeral ligaments forms the biomechanical basis for the capsular shift procedure. The compliance of the joint under our loading conditions indicates that the passive properties of the capsule provide little resistance to motion of the humerus during 10 mm of anterior or posterior translation with anatomic humeral rotation. Finally, this knowledge also enhances the understanding of arm positioning relative to the portion of the glenohumeral capsule that limits translation during examination under anesthesia.     

Posterior instability

Posterior shoulder instability is a pathology that is increasingly seen in athletes. Excessive capsular laxity was originally proposed as the key component. Recent cadaveric and arthroscopic work has identified the importance of glenolabral integrity and glenoid depth in maintaining glenohumeral stability. Arthroscopic techniques to treat posterior instability are emerging. Until recently, reports of arthroscopic reconstruction focused entirely on capsular glenohumeral stability by altering two separate mechanisms: deepening of the glenoid concavity and reducing the capsular joint volume. This is accomplished by shifting the capsule to buttress the glenoid labrum. Thus increasing capsular tension increases the resultant compressive force vector into a deepened glenolabral concavity that, when combined together, enhances glenohumeral stability. In clinical and laboratory settings, we have shown that posteroinferior shoulder instability is associated with both capsular laxity and well-defined pathological lesions of the glenolabral concavity. Our results indicate that arthroscopic posterior capsulolabral repair and augmentation is a useful tool to restore the depth of the glenolabral concavity and to reduce the redundant posteroinferior capsule. This technique is effective in treating posteroinferior instability.     

Dynamic capsuloligamentous anatomy of the glenohumeral joint

Though many anatomic and biomechanical studies have been performed to elucidate capsuloligamentous anatomy of the glenohumeral joint, no previous studies have evaluated capsuloligamentous anatomy during rotator cuff contraction. The purpose of this study was to define and document the orientation and interrelationship between the glenohumeral ligaments during simulated rotator cuff contraction. Six fresh cadaveric shoulders were arthroscoped to document and grade ligamentous anatomy. The superior and middle glenohumeral ligaments and the anterior and posterior bands of the inferior glenohumeral ligament complex were labeled by an arthroscopicassisted technique with a linked metallic bead system. Shoulders were then placed onto an experimental apparatus that simulated rotator cuff function through computer-controlled servo-hydrolic actuators attached to the rotator cuff and biceps by a clamp and cable-and-pulley system. Simulated rotator cuff action and manual placement allowed shoulders to be placed into three positions of rotation (neutral, internal, and external) in three positions of scapular plane abduction (0°, 45°, 90°). Anteroposterior and axillary lateral plane radiographs were taken in each position to document orientation of all four ligaments. Both the superior and middle glenohumeral ligaments were maximally lengthened in 0° and 45° abduction and external rotation and appeared to shorten in all positions of abduction. The anterior and posterior bands of the inferior glenohumeral ligament complex maintained a cruciate orientation in all positions of abduction in the anteroposterior plane, except at 90° abduction and external rotation, where they are parallel. This cruciate orientation is due to the different location of the glenoid origin and humeral insertion of each band and may allow reciprocal tightening of each during rotation. The glenohumeral capsule is composed of discreet ligaments that undergo large charges in orientation during rotation. The superior and middle glenohumeral ligaments appear to complement the inferior glenohumeral ligaments, with the former tightening in adduction and the latter tightening in abduction. This relationship permits the large range of motion normally seen in the glenohumeral joint.     

The rotator interval: anatomy, pathology, and strategies for treatment

Over the past two decades, it has become accepted that the rotator interval is a distinct anatomic entity that plays an important role in affecting the proper function of the glenohumeral joint. The rotator interval is an anatomic region in the anterosuperior aspect of the glenohumeral joint that represents a complex interaction of the fibers of the coracohumeral ligament, the superior glenohumeral ligament, the glenohumeral joint capsule, and the supraspinatus and subscapularis tendons. As basic science and clinical studies continue to elucidate the precise role of the rotator interval, understanding of and therapeutic interventions for rotator interval pathology also continue to evolve. Lesions of the rotator interval may result in glenohumeral joint contractures, shoulder instability, or in lesions to the long head of the biceps tendon. Long-term clinical trials may clarify the results of current surgical interventions and further enhance understanding of the rotator interval.