Influence of the direction of tubules on bond strength to dentin

This study investigated the influence of the direction of dentinal tubules on resin-dentin tensile bond strength (mu TBS) using four commercially available bonding systems and observed the resin-dentin interfaces with an SEM. The dentin bonding systems used in this study were Clearfil Liner Bond II (LB, Kuraray), Imperva Fluoro Bond (FB, Shofu), Single Bond (SB, 3M) and One-Step (OS, BISCO). Thirty-six extracted caries-free human molars were used for micro tensile bond testing and eight additional teeth were used for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The teeth were divided into two groups according to the direction of the dentinal tubules at the resin-dentin interface: a perpendicular group, in which the occlusal enamel was removed perpendicular to the long axis of the tooth, and a parallel group, in which the mesial half of the tooth was removed parallel to the long axis of the tooth, and the coronal dentin surface was used for bonding. After the flat dentin surfaces were polished with #600 silicon carbide paper, each surface was treated with one of the four adhesive systems according to the manufacturer's recommendation, then covered with resin composite (Clearfil AP-X, Kuraray) to provide sufficient bulk for micro-tensile bond testing. After 24 hours in 37 degrees C water, the resin-bonded teeth were serially sliced perpendicular to the adhesive surface, the adhesive interface trimmed to a cross sectional area of 1 mm2 and subjected to tensile forces at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Statistical analysis of the tensile bond strengths were performed using two-way ANOVA and Fisher's PLSD test at 95% level of confidence. The tensile bond strength of the group with tubules parallel to the bonded interface was higher than that of tubules cut perpendicularly. This tendency reached statistical significance using SB and OS.     

Influence of light irradiation of dentine primers on dentine-resin bond

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of light irradiation of dentine primers that contain camphoroquinone (CQ) on the shear bond strength to dentine and their contact angle.

Method: Three dentine bonding systems which contain CQ, Imperva Bond, OptiBond and XR-Bond; and Light Bond, which does not contain CQ, were employed. Labial surfaces of freshly extracted lower bovine incisors were ground with no. 600 grit SiC paper. Dentine primers were applied to the dentine surfaces in two groups, irradiated and non-irradiated. A shear bond strength test was performed and the direct contact angle was measured.

Results: Statistical analysis (Newman-Keuls multiple comparison P < 0.05) of the data indicated that light irradiation of the dentine primer for systems containing CQ resulted in increased bond strength and decreased contact angle.

Conclusion: This study indicates that for these dentine bonding systems containing CQ in their primers, light irradiation of the dentine primer is effective in improving wettability and increasing the bond strength to dentine.     

Adhesion to Er:YAG laser and bur prepared root and crown dentine

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strengths between dentine and resin composite obtained after Er:YAG laser treatment of crown or root dentine used together with self‐etch and total‐etch adhesive systems. Methods: One etch‐and‐rinse adhesive (Single Bond, 3M, USA) and one self‐etch system (Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray, Japan) were applied to root and crown dentine prepared with a regular bur in a turbine or with an Er:YAG laser. The shear bond strength was determined after thermocycling and statistically analysed using independent t‐tests. Results: Crown sites bonded using Clearfil SE Bond and Single Bond adhesives yielded bond strengths similar to that of root dentine sites (p > 0.05). Clearfil SE Bond was stronger in both the lased and non‐lased groups (p < 0.05). The lowest bond strength was obtained when Single Bond without acid etching was used on Er:YAG ablated dentine. When total‐etch adhesive was used, there were significant differences (p < 0.05) between the laser‐ablated and laser‐ablated/acid‐etched and bur‐cut/acid‐etched groups. Conclusions: Er:YAG laser irradiation of root and crown dentine conducted prior to the adhesive protocol adversely affected adhesion and decreased bond strength compared with traditional preparation.     

Thin and thick layers of resin‐based sealer cement bonded to root dentine compared: Adhesive behaviour

This study aims to evaluate tensile and shear bond strengths of one epoxy (AH) and two methacrylate resin‐based sealers (EZ and RS) in thin and thick layers bonded to root dentine. An alignment device was prepared for accurate positioning of 20 root dentine cylinders in a predefined gap of 0.1 or 1 mm. Sealer was placed in the interface. Bond strength tests were conducted. Mode of failures and representative surfaces were evaluated. Data were analysed using anova and post‐hoc tests, with P < 0.05. The thick layer of sealer produced higher bond strength, except for the shear bond strength of EZ. Significant differences between thin and thick layers were found only in tensile bond strengths of AH and RS. Mixed type of failure was constantly found with all sealers. Bond strengths of thick layers of resin‐based sealers to root dentine tended to be higher than with thin layers.     

The effect of different sealer removal protocols on the bond strength of AH plus‐contaminated dentine to a bulk‐fill composite

The integrity of composite bonding for post‐endodontic restorations may be compromised by sealer contamination. This study assessed the effect of different sealer removal regimes on the bond strength of dentine to composite resin. Dentine surfaces were contaminated with AH Plus sealer (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany), followed by removal with either dry cotton pellets, cotton pellets saturated with 95% ethanol, AH Plus cleaner or external surface preparation. Dentine surfaces were not contaminated in a positive control group. A bulk‐fill composite (SDR; Dentsply) was bonded with Prime&Bond active universal adhesive (Dentsply) onto the prepared surface. Composite resin–dentine beams were produced, and tensile bond strength was determined using a universal testing machine. Using an etch‐and‐rinse adhesive, bond strengths varied from 21.34 to 29.11 MPa with no statistical differences among removal protocols. In conclusion, contamination by AH Plus sealer does not appear to substantially interfere with bond strength between dentine and a bulk‐fill composite/etch‐and‐rinse system.     

An in-vitro investigation of the effect of a water additive and a new acidic primer on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to human enamel and dentine

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a water additive on the bond strength of a composite restorative material to enamel and dentine which have undergone a range of surface treatments regimes. Human enamel and dentine specimens were prepared and divided into 3 surface treatment groups. Composite resin restorative material was bonded to the surface prepared enamel and dentine specimens. The tensile bond strength of the composite resin was measured using a Lloyd's testing machine. The tensile bond strength of composite resin to etched enamel surfaces using a standard etch technique was significantly greater than that to dentine (p < 0.05). For those specimens subjected to the addition of the water additive 'Alpron' the bond strength to the enamel was still significantly greater than to the dentine (p< 0.005). The addition of 'Alpron' to the water significantly improved the bond strength of composite to enamel and dentine when etched and placed with 'Prime&BondNT' (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in bond strength of enamel and dentine specimens bonded using Xeno III (p> 0.05). However, the bond strength of dentine specimens bonded with Xeno III was significantly greater than other dentine specimens bonded with Prime&BondNT (p< 0.05). For those groups of specimens which included the water additive 'Alpron' in the regime, the tensile bond strength of the composite resin restorative material to enamel and dentine was greater than for those non water additive groups. The tensile bond strength of composite resin bonded to enamel surfaces prepared with 'Alpron' was significantly higher than that bonded to dentine surfaces.     

Micro-tensile bond strengths of bonding agents to pulpal floor dentine

AIM: The purpose of this study was to characterize the dentine surface of the pulpal floor and to determine the micro-tensile bond strengths of two dentine adhesive systems used in conjunction with a resin composite core material to pulpal floor dentine. METHODOLOGY: Thirty-six extracted human molars were cut horizontally with a slow-speed diamond saw to expose the pulp chamber and the pulp tissue was removed. Eight teeth were used to investigate characteristics of untreated and etched dentine surfaces of the pulpal floor using SEM. Twenty-eight teeth were randomly allocated to two groups, each of 14 teeth. In group 1, a 'one-bottle' system (Prime & Bond NT) was used as dentine bonding agent and in group 2, a self-etching-priming system (Clearfil SE Bond) was applied. Pulp chambers of both groups were then filled with resin composite core buildup (FluoroCore) and kept moist in tap water at 37 degrees C for 24 h. Samples were prepared for micro-tensile bond testing by sectioning each tooth vertically in the mid-pulpal floor region and shaped to an hour-glass form of 1 +/- 0.2 mm(2) area at the bonded interface. Micro-tensile bond strengths were determined using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm min-1. Fractured surfaces were examined by SEM. RESULTS: The intact pulpal floor showed numerous calcospherites with variable tubule density and few accessory canals. Etching the pulpal floor with 34% phosphoric acid gel resulted in an irregular surface with patent dentinal tubules and the dome-shaped calcospherites mostly lost. With self-etching primer, the superficial dentine surface was less demineralized and little peritubular dentine matrix was removed. Mean bond strength for the self-etching-priming (Clearfil SE Bond) specimens was significantly greater than for 'one-bottle' (Prime & Bond NT) specimens (P< 0.05, Student's t-test). The fracture mode of Clearfil SE Bond specimens was mostly partial cohesive failure within dentine, whilst Prime & Bond NT specimens mostly showed partial cohesive failure in bonding resin/composite. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an irregular surface morphology and absence of a smear layer, bonding to pulpal floor dentine was weaker than previously reported for cut coronal dentine. The self-etching-priming system bonded more strongly than the 'one-bottle' system.     

Ceramic bracket bonding: a comparison of bond strength with polyacrylic acid and phosphoric acid enamel conditioning

The purpose of this study was to compare in vitro shear bond strength with three different enamel surface preparations: (1) 37% phosphoric acid etch, (2) sulfated polyacrylic acid etch with removal of crystals by vigorous rinsing and (3) polyacrylic acid etch with crystal growth. Forty extracted human premolar teeth were divided into four groups of ten. Ceramic brackets were bonded to teeth in each of three groups. The fourth group used was bonded with metal brackets and a phosphoric acid enamel preparation. The same lightly filled resin cement was used for all groups. A shearing force was applied to the teeth. The results demonstrated that the shear force needed to debond with ceramic brackets was 21% greater than the shear force with metal brackets. The polyacrylic acid crystal growth group had shear bond strength values approximately one half as great as the phosphoric acid etch group when ceramic brackets were used. Bond failures in the phosphoric acid etch group were at the bracket/resin interface with the bulk of the resin remaining on the tooth compared with the polyacrylic acid crystal growth group in which the bond failure was at the enamel resin interface. Enamel fractures were not found when healthy nonrestored teeth were subjected to the shearing force. In a preliminary test using phosphoric acid etch and teeth with compromised enamel (large restorations involving three or more surfaces), half of the teeth fractured during debonding. The study demonstrated that a polyacrylic acid conditioning of the enamel surface produces different retentive surfaces, depending on the presence or absence of crystal growth.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The effect of dentine location and tubule orientation on the bond strengths between resin and dentine

This study determined the influence of dentine structure on the micro-tensile bond strengths between resin and dentine of two different dentine adhesive systems (Single Bond, 3M Dental Products, St Paul, MN; MF-102 (experimental self-etching primer), GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The study was separated into two main parts: bond strength measurement and investigation of the bonding interface. Twenty-two human premolars were used for the bond strength measurement. Each tooth was cut vertically, separating the tooth into mesio-distal halves. One half of the tooth was used to bond to a surface perpendicular to the dentinal tubules and other half to bond to a surface parallel to the tubules. For each half, six locations of dentine were bonded. Each material was used in accordance to the manufacturer's directions. Cylindrical hourglass-shaped specimens of 1.2 mm diameter at the bonded interface were manufactured. The bonds were stressed in tension at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Mean bond strengths were compared using LSD, one-way ANOVA, and Student's t-test. The fractured surfaces were examined under a scanning electron microscope, and the frequency of fracture modes was compared using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. For the investigation of the bonded interface, four teeth were prepared by the same procedure used for the bond test specimens. The bonded interfaces were observed after an acid-base treatment or fracturing across the bonded interface, prior to investigation with a field-emission scanning electron microscope. For Single Bond, the bond strengths for mid-root dentine were significantly lower than for other locations (p < 0.05). For MF-102, there was no significant difference for all locations (p > 0.05). MF-102 bonded well to all locations of dentine while Single Bond showed a porous zone at the base of the hybrid layer. The bonds were not influenced by tubule orientation. The results indicate that the bond for Single Bond may be affected by its ability to penetrate demineralised dentine in different locations of a tooth. The self-etching primer of MF-102 produces a good bond and is independent of the position on the tooth.     

Effects of mechanical properties of adhesive resins on bond strength to dentin.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the micro-tensile bond strength to dentin and mechanical properties of the cured adhesive resins. METHODS: Coronal dentin surfaces of extracted human teeth were treated with four commercial self-etching priming systems (Clearfil SE Bond; UniFil Bond; Tokuso Mac-Bond II; and Imperva Fluoro Bond) and bonded with a resin composite. After 24h storage in water at 37 degrees C, the bonded specimens were trimmed and subjected to micro-tensile bond strength testing at a cross-head speed of 1mm/min. Debonded surfaces were observed under a FE-SEM. For testing mechanical properties, 0.7-mm thick slabs of each adhesive resin were prepared, light-cured, and stored dry at the room temperature for 24h. After trimming, ultimate micro-tensile strength was measured. The nano-hardness and Young's modulus were also evaluated using cured adhesives that were prepared in the same manner as described above. RESULTS: The micro-tensile bond strengths to dentin and ultimate micro-tensile strengths of the resins were not significantly different among all systems (P>0.05). However, the nano-hardness and Young's modulus of Clearfil SE Bond and Imperva Fluoro Bond adhesive resins were significantly higher than those of UniFil Bond and Tokuso Mac-Bond II resins (P<0.05). The micro-tensile bond strength significantly correlated with the ultimate micro-tensile strength of the resins (r(2)=0.77; P<0.05), but was not correlated with the nano-hardness or Young's modulus (P>0.05). SEM observation of the debonded surfaces revealed a mixed type of fracture with a combination of interfacial and cohesive failure within the adhesive resin. SIGNIFICANCE: The four self-etching priming systems exhibited similar dentin bond strengths, which also correlates with the ultimate strength of the adhesive resins.     

Influence of dentinal regions on bond strengths of different adhesive systems

This in vitro study assessed comparatively the shear bond strengths of three composite resins, 3M Valux Plus (3MVP), Herculite (H), Clearfil AP-X (CAP-X), a polyacid modified composite resin Dyract (D), and a resin modified glass-ionomer materials Vitremer (V), to cervical and buccal dentine regions of extracted human molar teeth. Four different bonding systems, 3M ScotchBond Multipurpose (SB), Clearfil Liner Bond 2 (LB2), Opti Bond (OB), and Prime & Bond 2.1 (PB 2.1) were used with the manufacturer's respective composite and compomer materials. One hundred freshly extracted mandibular molar teeth were selected for this study. Flat buccal dentine surfaces were created on 50 teeth and cylindrical rods of the five materials were bonded to the dentine surfaces. For assessment of cervical bond strengths, the materials were bonded to mesial and distal enamel bordered occlusal dentinal surfaces of the remaining 50 teeth. The five groups of restorative procedures were applied as follows; Group 1: SB + 3MVP, Group 2: LB2 + CAP-X, Group 3: OB + H, Group 4: PB2.1 + D, Group 5: Vitremer primer (VP) VP + V. Each restorative procedure thus had 20 specimens (10 buccal + 10 cervical). After 24 h of water storage (37 degrees C), the specimens were tested on a Universal Testing machine in shear with a cross head speed of 0.5 mm min-1. The bond strength values were calculated in MPa and the results were evaluated statistically using Kruskal-Wallis one-way/anova and Mann-Whitney U-tests. It was found that the bond strengths of SB + 3MVP, LB2 + CAP-X and VP + V to buccal dentine surfaces were significantly stronger (P < 0.05) than those to the occluso-cervical dentine floors. When the bond strengths to the occluso-cervical dentine and buccal dentine surface were compared, there was no significant difference between the materials (P > 0.05). Vitremer was found the least successful adhesive material in terms of shear bond strength on both buccal and occluso-cervical dentine surfaces.     

Microtensile and tensile bond strength of single-bottle adhesives: a new test method

To evaluate the tensile and microtensile bond strength of five single-bottle adhesives to dentine, extracted human molar teeth were used. For each tooth dentine was exposed on the occlusal surface by cutting with an isomet saw and the remaining part was mounted in a plastic ring using dental stone. The tested adhesive materials were: Scotchbond 1, Syntac SC, One-Step, Prime & Bond 2.1 and Clearfil SE Bond. The adhesive was applied to either 1 mm(2) of dentine or a circular area with a diameter of 3.9 mm. Composite resin Clearfil AP-X was placed to the adhesives using a Teflon split mould 3.9 mm in diameter and 2.5 mm in height. Tensile and microtensile bond strengths were measured using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm min(-1). Under tensile mode, the bond strengths were 16.7 +/- 3.5, 15.2 +/- 2.5, 11.5 +/- 3.2, 13.7 +/- 2.6, 20.9 +/- 4.2 MPa for each material. Under microtensile mode, the bond strengths were 52.5 +/- 9.5, 55.3 +/- 8.3, 40.5 +/- 5.2, 37.5 +/- 8.7, 60 +/- 6.21 MPa. Fracture pattern of bonded specimens showed 66% cohesive dentine failure in samples tested for tensile bond strength. For the microtensile test, failures were mainly adhesive at the interface between adhesive and dentine (94%).     

The Effect of Endodontic Irrigants on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Dentin Adhesives

IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of a total etch (XP-Bond) and a self-etch (Clearfil SE Bond) adhesive system to dentine surfaces treated using endodontic irrigants.MethodsTwenty-four freshly extracted third molars were used. After creating a smear layer on the coronal midthird portion of the crowns, the teeth were divided into three groups and surfaces were irrigated with distilled water, 5.25% NaOCl + 17% EDTA, and 1.3% NaOCl + BioPure MTAD, respectively. Each group was divided into two subgroups, and a self-etching adhesive and an etch-and-rinse adhesive were applied respectively. The teeth were restored with a composite material and sectioned to produce sticks for microtensile bond testing.ResultsThe microtensile bond strength of the MTAD + Clearfil SE group was found to be significantly lower than the microtensile bond strength of the distilled water + Clearfil SE Bond group and the NaOCl, EDTA, + Clearfil SE Bond group (p = 0.0001, p = 0.009).ConclusionsBecause of the significant reduction of Clearfil SE Bond to coronal dentine after MTAD application, an etch-and rinse adhesive such as XP-Bond may be preferred if this irrigant has been chosen during endodontic treatment.     

Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes

Objectives. This study tested the hypotheses that micro-tensile bond strengths of all currently available single-step adhesives to dentine are adversely affected by delayed activation of a light-cured composite, and that such a phenomenon only occurs in the presence of water from the substrate side of the bonded interface.

Methods. In experiment I, a control three-step adhesive (All-Bond 2, Bisco) and six single-step adhesives (One-Up Bond F, Tokuyama; Etch&Prime 3.0, Degussa; Xeno CF Bond, Sankin; AQ Bond, Sun Medical; Reactmer Bond, Shofu and Prompt L-Pop, 3M ESPE) were bonded to sound, hydrated dentine. A microfilled composite was placed over the cured adhesive and was either light-activated immediately, or after leaving the composite in the dark for 20 min. In experiment II, three single-step adhesives (Etch&Prime 3.0, Xeno CF Bond and AQ Bond) were similarly bonded to completely dehydrated dentine using the same delayed light-activation protocol. In experiment III, a piece of processed composite was used as the bonding substrate for the same three single-step adhesives. The microfilled composite was applied to the cured adhesives using the same immediate and delayed light-activation protocols. Bonded specimens were sectioned for micro-tensile bond strength evaluation. Fractographic analysis of the specimens was performed using SEM. Stained, undemineralised sections of unstressed, bonded specimens were also examined by TEM.

Results. When bonded to hydrated dentine, delayed light-activation had no effect on the control three-step adhesive, but significantly lowered the bond strengths of all the single-step adhesives (p<0.05). This adverse effect of delayed light-activation was not observed in the three single-step adhesives that were bonded to either dehydrated dentine or processed composite. Morphological manifestations of delayed light-activation of composite in the hydrated dentine bonding substrate were exclusively located along the composite–adhesive interface, and were present as large voids, resin globules and honeycomb structures that formed partitions around a myriad of small blisters along the fractured interfaces.

Conclusion. These features resembled the ‘overwet phenomenon’ that was previously reported along the dentine–adhesive interfaces of some acetone-based three-step adhesives. The cured adhesive layer in single-step adhesives may act as semi-permeable membranes that allow water diffusion from the bonded hydrated dentine to the intermixed zone between the adhesive and the uncured composite. Osmotic blistering of water droplets along the surface of the cured adhesive layer and emulsion polymerisation of immiscible resin components probably account for the compromised bond strength in single-step adhesives after delayed activation of light-cured composites.     

The effect of thermal cycling on the bovine dentine shear bond strength of current adhesive systems

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of thermal cycling on shear bond strength to bovine dentine of four current adhesive systems. Forty bovine incisors were ground flat with #600-grit silicon carbide paper to obtain superficial coronal dentine surfaces. Three one-bottle (etch and rinse) adhesive systems (Single Bond, Bond 1, One Step), and one self-etching primer adhesive system (Clearfil Liner Bond 2V) were evaluated. Dentine was conditioned and bonded with the adhesive systems tested according to the manufacturers' instructions. A cylindrical teflon mould (3 x 4 mm) was placed over the bonded area (to eliminate the bonded surface) and filled with composite resin. For each adhesive system the filling composite used was from the same manufacturer. Ten specimens were prepared for each material and all specimens were conditioned at 37 degrees C for 24 h. Five specimens of each material (half of the specimens) were thermocycled at 5000 cycles (at 5, 37, 55 and 37 degrees C) with a dwell time of 15 s and bonds were stressed in shear at a rate of 0.5 mm min(-1) until failure. Data were analysed by one-way anova and Student-Newman-Keuls rank test (alpha=0.05). Statistical analysis revealed that thermal cycling significantly (P < 0.05) reduced the bond strengths of all adhesive systems. Bond strengths prior to thermocycling were not significantly different (P > 0.05), except for One Step which revealed the lowest bond strength, and varied from 22.5 +/- 3.34 to 10.98 +/-0.87 MPa. After thermal cycling, the bond strengths ranged from 9.35 +/- 1.13 to 6.06 +/- 1.77 MPa. Failures after testing and prior to thermal cycle were most commonly adhesive failures between the bonding resin and dentine associated with partial cohesive failures in the adhesive resin (type 2). Adhesive failures between bonding resin and dentin (type 1) after thermocycling were most commonly seen.     

Effects of additional and extended acid etching on bonding to caries-affected dentine

This study evaluated the effects of additional and extended acid etching on microtensile bond strength ( micro TBS) of two adhesive systems to sound (SD) and caries-affected dentine (CAD). Flat surfaces of CAD surrounded by SD of 36 extracted carious third molars were assigned to four treatments (i): self-etching adhesive system (Clearfil SE Bond) applied to dentine surfaces following manufacturer's instructions (MI); (ii) after additional etching for 15 s (35% phosphoric acid, PA); (iii) total-etch one-bottle adhesive (Single Bond) applied to dentine surfaces following MI; or (iv), after etching for 45 s with PA. Composite 'blocks' were built on bonded surfaces and restored teeth were vertically sectioned to obtain bonded slices of 0.7 mm thick. Slices were trimmed to create hourglass-shaped specimens (cross-sectional area of 1 mm(2)), which were tested under tension in a universal testing machine. Additional CAD and SD samples were prepared for scanning electron microscopy observations. Additional and extended etching significantly increased micro TBS to CAD; however, micro TBS of both adhesives to CAD were significantly lower than to SD. Additional and extended etching can improve bonding to CAD; however, adhesives applied on SD showed the best results for bonding.     

Relationship between composite fracture toughness and bond strengths to enamel and dentine

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the association between the fracture toughness of two nanofilled‐hybrid resin composites (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic [CME], Kuraray Medical, Japan; Estelite Σ [ES], Tokuyama, Japan) and their bond strengths to enamel and dentine mediated by a self‐etching primer system (Clearfil SE Bond [CSE]; Kuraray). Methods: Twenty‐four permanent human molars were sectioned into enamel and dentine specimens and finished with 600‐grit silicon carbide paper, bonded with CSE and either CME or ES, for μ‐shear bond strength (μSBS) and μ‐tensile bond strength (μTBS). The specimens were tested until failure at a cross‐head speed of 1 mm/min, failure loads recorded, bond strengths calculated and results analysed using independent samples t‐tests. Eight single‐notched bar‐shaped specimens, 30 mm × 5.2 mm × 2.2 mm, were prepared for each resin composite and fracture toughness measured using four‐point bending at a cross‐head speed of 0.5 mm/min. Results were analysed using independent samples t‐tests. Results: For μSBS and μTBS, there was no significant difference between the resin composites for enamel or dentine. The fracture toughness of CME was significantly higher than that of ES. Conclusions: For both enamel and dentine, resin composite fracture toughness affected neither μTBS nor μSBS to enamel or dentine.     

Effect of tooth age on microtensile bond strength of two fluoride-releasing bonding agents

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of age of dentin and enamel on the microtensile bond strengths of a glass-ionomer based, all-in-one, single-step, self-etching adhesive system (Reactmer Bond, RB) and an antibacterial, two-step self-etching primer system (ABF Bond, ABF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Extracted molars from 3 age groups (20 to 25, 35 to 40, and 50 to 55 years) were used. Enamel was removed from the occlusal surfaces of the teeth, and the entire flat surfaces were covered with composite resin (4 mm in height) following application of bonding agents. The bonded specimens were thinly sectioned parallel to the long axis of the tooth into 0.87 +/- 0.03 mm2 rectangular sections, resulting in 6 to 7 enamel specimens and 10 to 15 dentin specimens per tooth. The specimens were subjected to the microtensile test at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed by Univariate ANOVA, Tukey HSD, and regression analysis. RESULTS: The bond strength of ABF to both enamel and dentin was higher than the bond strength of RB. Bond strengths of ABF to dentin were significantly higher than the bond strengths to enamel (p < 0.05). The 35- to 40-year age group of ABF showed the highest bond strength of all. In RB dentin groups, 34% of specimens showed cohesive failure in composite resin material. CONCLUSION: Bond strength values to enamel were not affected by age of teeth in either bonding system. Dentinal bond strength using ABF changed according to age of the teeth. Age did not affect bond strength values of RB to dental hard tissues. However, the high number of cohesive failures in Reactmer paste indicated low tensile strength of the material.     

Effect of dentin conditioners on the microtensile bond strength of a conventional and a self-etching primer adhesive system.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of different dentin treatments on the microtensile bond strength of a self-etching primer and a simplified, total-etch adhesive system. METHODS: Flat dentin surfaces were created on extracted human third molars. The surfaces were treated with one of the following conditioners: self-etching primer for 20 s (Clearfil SE Primer), 37% phosphoric acid for 15 s or 0.5 M EDTA for 30 s. Conditioned surfaces were then bonded with either Clearfil SE Bond or Single Bond followed by resin composite (Z250) build-ups constructed incrementally. Application of SE Primer was included when Clearfil SE Bond was used, after phosphoric acid and EDTA conditioning. After 24 h storage in water at 37 degrees C, the teeth were longitudinally sectioned across the bonded interface to produce beams with 1.0 mm2 of adhesive area, tested with the microtensile method at a rate of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. RESULTS: The highest bond strength mean was found for the combination SE Primer/Single Bond (58.5+/-20.8 MPa), followed by the EDTA/Clearfil SE Bond (47.8+/-15.1 MPa) and phosphoric acid/Single Bond (40.9+/-14.3 MPa). The remaining combinations showed statistically similar (p>0.05) tensile bond strength. SIGNIFICANCE: The bond performance of the adhesives tested was dependent on the dentin conditioner. Pre-treatment with a mild etchant such as 0.5 M EDTA improved the bond strength of Clearfil SE Bond. Single Bond performed better when a self-etching primer was used as the dentin conditioner, probably by preventing the formation of a defective zone at the base of the hybrid layer. Overall results indicate that higher bond strengths can be achieved by conditioning dentin with milder etchants, suggesting that deeper demineralization may prevent proper resin infiltration, hence compromising the bond.     

Correlation between degree of conversion,resin–dentin bond strength and nanoleakage of simplified etch-and-rinse adhesives

Objectives

The aim of this study was to correlate the degree of conversion measured inside the hybrid layer (DC) with the microtensile resin–dentin bond strength (μTBS) and silver nitrate uptake or nanoleakage (SNU) for five simplified etch-and-rinse adhesive systems.

Methods

Fifty-five caries free extracted molars were used in this study. Thirty teeth were used for μTBS/SNU [n = 6] and 25 teeth for DC [n = 5]. The dentin surfaces were bonded with the following adhesives: Adper Single Bond 2 (SB), Ambar (AB), XP Bond (XP), Tetric N-Bond (TE) and Stae (ST) followed by composite resin build-ups. For μTBS and SNU test, bonded teeth were sectioned in order to obtain stick-shaped specimens (0.8 mm²), which were tested under tensile stress (0.5 mm/min). Three bonded sticks, from each tooth, were not tested in tensile stress and they were immersed in 50% silver nitrate, photo-developed and analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. Longitudinal 1-mm thick sections were prepared for the teeth assigned for DC measurement and evaluated by micro-Raman spectroscopy.

Results

ST showed lowest DC, μTBS, and higher SNU (p < 0.05). All other adhesives showed similar DC, μTBS, and SNU (p > 0.05), except for TE which showed an intermediate SNU level. The DC was positively correlated with μTBS and negatively correlated with SNU (p < 0.05). SNU was also negatively correlated with μTBS (p < 0.05).

Significance

The measurement of DC inside the hybrid layer can provide some information about bonding performance of adhesive systems since this property showed a good correlation with resin–dentin bond strength and SNU values.