Personalised medicine: Development and external validation of a prognostic model for metastatic melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to set up a prognostic model for the identification of survival predictors specific for melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab.Experimental designThe following prospectively collected data were utilised: patient and primary tumour characteristics, relapse-free-interval, site and number of metastases, previous therapies and level of serum biomarkers (lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein, β2-microglobulin, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), IL2, IL6, S-100, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), transaminases, leucocyte count, lymphocytes subpopulations). A multivariate prognostic model was developed using the Cox regression model fitted to the data of 113 consecutive metastatic patients treated with ipilimumab (3 mg/kg, q3w) at Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV). External validation was obtained using the data of 69 and 34 patients treated at European Oncology Institute (IEO) and University of Torino (UT), respectively.ResultsMedian survival was 8.3, 4.9 and 7.1 months from first ipilimumab administration at IOV, IEO and UT, respectively. Both higher baseline levels of LDH (Hazard Ratio [HR] v = 1.36, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.16–1.58, P < .001) and neutrophils (HR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.41–2.10, P < .001) were associated with worse prognosis. Model performance was satisfactory both upon internal validation (Dxy = 0.42) and external validation (Dxy = 0.40). Serum LDH and neutrophil count discriminated patients who lived more (low neutrophils and low LDH) or less (high LDH or neutrophils) than 24 months.ConclusionSerum LDH and neutrophil count were significant independent prognostic factors. This externally validated prognostic nomogram, could help clinicians to identify the patients who would benefit most from ipilimumab and consequently to improve resource allocation. These easily available biomarkers deserve further validation.     

Immune checkpoint blockade for unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma: A systematic review

BackgroundThe use of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) for uveal melanoma (UM) is little established. The aim of this review was to provide a comprehensive overview on the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ICB in patients with UM.MethodsWe performed a systematic literature research covering MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL. Abstracts of pertinent conferences and trial registers were handsearched for relevant studies.ResultsOut of 1327 records initially identified, 12 eligible studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. They comprised 7 expanded access or named patient programs (n = 162), 4 phase II trials (n = 171), and 1 phase Ib trial (sample size unknown), while no randomized controlled trial was found. Ipilimumab monotherapy was assessed at 3 mg/kg in 5 trials (n = 186) with a response rate of 0 to 5%. Two reports investigated ipilimumab at 10 mg/kg (n = 45) with radiological responses observed in 0 to 6.5%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was below 3 months and the median overall survival was 5.2–9.8 months for ipilimumab monotherapy. Severe immune-related adverse events occurred at a frequency comparable to cutaneous melanoma (6 to 36%). Two studies investigated pembrolizumab (2 mg/kg) and nivolumab (3 mg/kg) with overall response rates of 30% and 6%, respectively. Data on combined ipilimumab and programmed cell death protein 1 inhibition were available from one expanded access program, but no response was observed with a median PFS of 2.9 months.ConclusionsUM is little responsive to ipilimumab regardless of dosage schemes. Sound randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of combined ICB in patients with UM.     

Combined low-dose ipilimumab and pembrolizumab after sequential ipilimumab and pembrolizumab failure in advanced melanoma

With the wide use of anti-PD-1 therapy, an increasing number of patients progress under treatment. Combined immunotherapy with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies induces higher response rates as first-line treatment in comparison to single-agent therapy, however, with substantial toxicity since the combination of ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) and nivolumab (1 mg/kg) induced 55% grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events and treatment discontinuation rates of 39%. In this case series, we investigated the efficacy and toxicity of the combined immunotherapy with low-dose ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) plus pembrolizumab (2 mg/kg) in patients with metastatic melanoma with progressive disease under sequential monotherapy with both agents. All patients had received at least three lines of treatment, 78% of patients were M1c, and 67% had brain metastases. Stable disease was observed in 3 out of 9 patients with a median overall survival of 8 months after double checkpoint inhibition. No treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred, and none of the patients needed to discontinue the treatment due to toxicity. Further trials are needed to investigate combined immunotherapy as rescue treatment in heavily pretreated melanoma patients to find optimal dosage in regard to outcome and toxicity.     

Efficacy and safety of ipilimumab 3 mg/kg in patients with pretreated,metastatic, mucosal melanoma

BackgroundMucosal melanoma is an extremely rare and aggressive malignancy that often remains undetected until it reaches an advanced stage, when effective treatment options are limited. The activity and safety of ipilimumab were assessed in an Expanded Access Programme (EAP) that included patients with metastatic, mucosal melanoma.MethodsIpilimumab was available upon physician request for patients aged ⩾16 years with stage III (unresectable) or IV skin, ocular or mucosal melanoma, who had failed or did not tolerate previous treatments and had no other therapeutic option available. Patients received ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses. Patients with stable disease or an objective response to ipilimumab were eligible for retreatment upon disease progression. Tumour assessments were conducted at baseline and week 12 using immune-related response criteria. Patients were monitored for adverse events (AEs), including immune-related AEs, within 3 to 4 days of each scheduled visit.ResultsOf 855 patients participating in the EAP in Italy, 71 (8%) had metastatic, mucosal melanoma. With a median follow-up of 21.8 months, the response rate was 12% and the immune-related disease control rate was 36%. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.3 and 6.4 months, respectively. In total, 34% of patients reported treatment-related AEs of any grade, which were grade 3 or 4 in 9% of patients. AEs were generally manageable as per protocol-specific guidelines.Conclusion/interpretationIpilimumab may be a feasible treatment option in pretreated patients with metastatic mucosal melanoma, and warrants further investigation in prospective clinical trials.     

Atypical neurological complications of ipilimumab therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma

Background

Ipilimumab is a novel FDA-approved recombinant human monoclonal antibody that blocks cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 and has been used to treat patients with metastatic melanoma. Immune-related neurological adverse effects include inflammatory myopathy, aseptic meningitis, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, Guillain-Barré syndrome, myasthenia gravis–type syndrome, sensorimotor neuropathy, and inflammatory enteric neuropathy. To date, there is no report for ipilimumab-induced chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), transverse myelitis (TM), or concurrent myositis and myasthenia gravis–type syndrome. Our objective is to raise early recognition of atypical neurological adverse events and to share our therapeutic approach.

Methods

We report 3 cases of metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab in which the patients developed CIDP, TM, and concurrent myositis and myasthenia gravis–type syndrome, respectively, at the MD Anderson Cancer Center between July 2012 and June 2013. Patients consented to release of medical information for publication/educational purposes.

Results

Our 3 cases of metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab developed CIDP, TM, and concurrent myositis and myasthenia gravis–type syndrome, respectively. The median time to onset of immune-related adverse events following ipilimumab treatment ranged from 1 to 2 weeks. Ipilimumab was discontinued due to the severe neurological symptoms. Plasmapheresis was initiated in the patients with CIDP and concurrent myositis and myasthenia gravis–type syndrome; high-dose intravenous steroids were given to the patient with TM, and significant clinical response was demonstrated.

Conclusions

Ipilimumab could induce a wide spectrum of neurological adverse effects. Our findings support the standard treatment of withholding or discontinuing ipilimumab. Plasmapheresis or high-dose intravenous steroids may be considered as the initial choice of treatment for severe ipilimumab-related neurological adverse events. Improvement of neurological symptoms may be seen within 2 weeks.     

Sustained complete remission after chemobiohormonal therapy for metastatic melanoma

The combination of carmustine, cisplatin, dacarbazine, interferon, and low-dose tamoxifen is widely used in treating metastatic melanoma and was originally reported to achieve a 20% complete response rate. Among 29 patients who completed the authors' phase II study with the regimen, five (17%) achieved complete remission, and the median duration of response was 8 months (range, 2-14 months). The aim of the study was to evaluate briefly the value and toxicity of this regimen in treating metastatic malignant melanoma.     

Chemotherapy for metastatic melanoma

Melanoma is a neoplasm with a rising incidence. Early-stage melanoma is curable, but advanced, metastatic melanoma almost uniformly is fatal, and patients with such advanced disease have a short median survival. Systemic therapy remains unsatisfactory, inducing complete durable responses in a small minority of patients. For the current review, the authors focused on the current role of cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic melanoma and the future prospects for improvements for multiagent chemotherapy and chemotherapy combined with immunomodulatory and/or molecularly targeted agents. They discuss roles of single-agent chemotherapy, combination chemotherapy, combinations of chemotherapy with immunomodulatory or hormone agents, biochemotherapy, and combination chemotherapy with targeted therapies.     

Nodal radiation therapy for metastatic melanoma

Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to review our experience of radiation therapy to regional nodes in patients with proven nodal metastases, with respect to regional control, late toxicity, and overall survival.

Methods and Materials: All patients with a histological diagnosis of malignant melanoma, with involvement of the regional nodes but without distant metastases, who commenced nodal irradiation between January 1985 and July 1995 at Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute were studied. The study population of 113 patients was divided into two categories: those with no residual macroscopic disease following nodal surgery (adjuvant group, 42 patients) and those who had no surgery (8) or had macroscopic residual disease following nodal surgery (63) (palliative group, 71 patients).

Results: In the adjuvant group at 5 years following commencement of nodal irradiation 26% were estimated to be failure-free. Of the 74% who had experienced treatment failure by 5 years, an estimated 20% failed first with nodal relapse, 52% with distant metastases, and 2% with both nodal relapse and distant metastases. The estimated 5-year overall survival for this group was 33%. In the palliative group 16 patients (23%) had an objective complete response. Altogether 48 patients (68%) had a symptomatic response. At 5 years the overall survival in this group was 8% and an estimated 4% were failure-free. Of the 96% who had failed by 5 years, 68% failed first in the regional nodes, 25% had distant metastases as the first failure, and 3% had both nodal relapse and distant metastases.

Conclusion: We recommend adjuvant postoperative radiation therapy for patients with proven nodal metastases and high risk of regional recurrence (multiple nodes, extracapsular extension, or recurrent nodal disease) in addition to adjuvant interferon.     

Combined immune therapy grade IV dermatitis in metastatic melanoma

Checkpoint inhibition is the mainstay of treatment in metastatic melanoma. More recently combined cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte antigen‐4 and programmed‐death‐1 blockade has resulted in improved response rates and overall survival in treatment naïve patients compared to monotherapy albeit with increased rates of adverse events. Dermatologic toxicities are an emerging consequence of the use of checkpoint inhibitors and have reportedly been more prevalent with the use of combined therapy. However, grade 3 and 4 adverse event rates are still less than 5%. Here, we report a case of a 63‐year‐old Caucasian male with metastatic melanoma treated with first line combined ipilimumab and nivolumab who then developed a steroid refractory, biopsy confirmed pityriasis lichenoides‐like, drug related rash that resolved with cyclosporine. Time of onset was 24 days and presenting symptoms demonstrated a maculopapular rash presenting over the back and chest with pruritus. Unfortunately, the patient subsequently had multi‐organ failure with acute kidney injury requiring dialysis, hypotension requiring vasopressor support, hepatic dysfunction, and bilateral lung infiltrates resulting in a fatal outcome. This case report highlights the effective use of cyclosporine as an immunomodulatory agent in the management of severe dermatological toxicity due to combination immunotherapy.     

Immune surveillance in melanoma: From immune attack to melanoma escape and even counterattack

Pharmacologic inhibition of the cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) and the programmed death receptor-1 (PD1) has resulted in unprecedented durable responses in metastatic melanoma. However, resistance to immunotherapy remains a major challenge. Effective immune surveillance against melanoma requires 4 essential steps: activation of the T lymphocytes, homing of the activated T lymphocytes to the melanoma microenvironment, identification and episode of melanoma cells by activated T lymphocytes, and the sensitivity of melanoma cells to apoptosis. At each of these steps, there are multiple factors that may interfere with the immune surveillance machinery, thus allowing melanoma cells to escape immune attack and develop resistance to immunotherapy. We provide a comprehensive review of the complex immune surveillance mechanisms at play in melanoma, and a detailed discussion of how these mechanisms may allow for the development of intrinsic or acquired resistance to immunotherapeutic modalities, and potential avenues for overcoming this resistance.     

Predicting response to IL-2 therapy for metastatic melanoma

Evaluation of: Sabatino M, Kim-Schulz S, Panelli MC et al. Serum vascular endothelial growth factor and fibronectin predict clinical response to high-dose IL-2 therapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 27(16), 2645–2652 (2009).

IL-2 therapy induces durable responses in a small proportion of patients with metastatic melanoma, a disease refractory to most anticancer treatments. However, administration requires intensive medical support; due to the risk of severe side effects, hence identification of likely responders or nonresponders would be of great clinical value. This study prospectively examined patient serum pre- and post-IL-2 infusion and analyzed for protein markers of response, in training and test sets. Elevated baseline levels of VEGF and fibronectin predicted a lack of response to IL-2 therapy and worse overall outcome. Serum VEGF is an easily measured biomarker and is a potentially clinically useful test to exclude patients unlikely to benefit from IL-2 treatment, if the results of this study are replicable. Significant biological questions are raised by this study and, furthermore, the use of IL-2 in the context of emerging molecular therapies for metastatic melanoma needs careful consideration.     

肿瘤免疫细胞治疗：前景与挑战

免疫细胞治疗通过修复患者机体免疫系统、激发免疫功能成为肿瘤的一种新的治疗方法,已经被证实具有较好的安全性,在部分肿瘤患者中取得了良好的治疗效果。本文聚焦近年来国内外开展的CAR-T细胞、TCR-T细胞、NK细胞、TIL等免疫细胞治疗方法在肿瘤中的临床安全性和有效性,同时从技术、产业化、政策等三个层面,提出中国免疫细胞治疗领域存在的关键问题、挑战及相应的解决策略,包括原创性基础理论研究的加强,新技术的应用和转化,细胞产品制备及临床研究的规范,先进的自动化、工业化细胞生产工艺体系的完善,细胞治疗产业上游产品保障,创新能力强的高水平科研、临床研究队伍的培养和壮大,以及与细胞治疗技术发展相适应的政策法规、科学监管体系的建立和完善等。这些问题的解决,可确保中国免疫细胞治疗的良性发展。     

Restoration of tumor equilibrium after immunotherapy for advanced melanoma: three illustrative cases

Metastatic melanoma runs a predictable detrimental course in the vast majority of patients. New modalities of immunotherapy, such as melanoma antigen-specific therapeutic vaccination and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) receptor blockade by monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), have been associated with atypical kinetics of tumor response that differ from those observed during cytotoxic treatment. Recently, new tumor response criteria have been proposed based on the tumor response characteristics observed in clinical studies with ipilimumab (the so-called 'immune-related response criteria'). We report three illustrative cases of the American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IV-M1c melanoma patients who experienced atypical kinetics of tumor response to the treatment with the CTLA-4-blocking mAb, ipilimumab (case 1), or an autologous dendritic cell vaccine in combination with interferon α-2b (cases 2 and 3). These cases show that atypical response patterns not only relate to the outcome of CTLA-4-blocking mAb therapy but also to the treatment with therapeutic vaccines and interferon α-2b.     

Intralesional therapy as a treatment for locoregionally metastatic melanoma

Introduction: The emergence of novel intralesional therapies have dramatically changed the treatment landscape for melanoma. The heterogeneous presentation of melanoma continues to pose challenges for clinicians, especially when dealing with advanced locoregional disease. Intralesional therapies have the benefit of causing local tumor destruction, while minimizing systemic toxicity. Moreover, the integration of immunotherapeutic agents into intralesional compounds has resulted in the additional benefit of a bystander effect, whereby untreated distant lesions also derive a benefit from treatment. Intralesional therapy has assumed an important role in the management of unresectable, locoregional disease for melanoma.

Areas covered: Multiple intralesional agents have been studied over the years, with only a few demonstrating promising results. This review will provide an overview of the different intralesional agents for melanoma. Mechanisms of action, clinical efficacy, and side effects will be the primary focus.

Expert commentary: Treatment options for advanced melanoma continue to evolve. Attractive new therapies delivered by an intralesional route has demonstrated promising results, with minimal side effects. The ideal treatment strategy for melanoma will remain a multimodal approach; intralesional therapy provides an additional tool in the treatment armamentarium for melanoma.     

Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry: Quality assurance in the care of patients with metastatic melanoma in the Netherlands

BackgroundIn recent years, the treatment of metastatic melanoma has changed dramatically due to the development of immune checkpoint and mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase inhibitors. A population-based registry, the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry (DMTR), was set up in July 2013 to assure the safety and quality of melanoma care in the Netherlands. This article describes the design and objectives of the DMTR and presents some results of the first 2 years of registration.MethodsThe DMTR documents detailed information on all Dutch patients with unresectable stage IIIc or IV melanoma. This includes tumour and patient characteristics, treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, quality of life, healthcare utilisation, informal care and productivity losses. These data are used for clinical auditing, increasing the transparency of melanoma care, providing insights into real-world cost-effectiveness and creating a platform for research.ResultsWithin 1 year, all melanoma centres were participating in the DMTR. The quality performance indicators demonstrated that the BRAF inhibitors and ipilimumab have been safely introduced in the Netherlands with toxicity rates that were consistent with the phase III trials conducted. The median overall survival of patients treated with systemic therapy was 10.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.1–11.1) in the first registration year and 12.7 months (95% CI 11.6–13.7) in the second year.ConclusionThe DMTR is the first comprehensive multipurpose nationwide registry and its collaboration with all stakeholders involved in melanoma care reflects an integrative view of cancer management. In future, the DMTR will provide insights into challenging questions regarding the definition of possible subsets of patients who benefit most from the new drugs.