A meta-analysis of infrainguinal arterial reconstruction in patients with end-stage renal disease.

OBJECTIVES: to determine graft patency, limb salvage, and patient survival following infrainguinal bypass grafting in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). METHODS: studies published from 1987 through 2000 were identified from the PUBMED database and pertinent original articles. Sixteen studies were found that used survival analysis to report the outcomes of interest. Two investigators independently extracted the data from standard life-tables, survival curves and texts. A new method was developed for meta-analysis of uncontrolled studies that use survival analysis with different follow-up intervals. RESULTS: random-effects modelling yielded the following summary estimates at one- and two-year follow-up: 79% (95% CI, 70-87%) and 74% (63-85%) for graft patency; 77% (69-84%) and 73% (64-81%) for limb salvage; and 59% and 42% for patient survival. CONCLUSION: despite a severely limited life span, infrainguinal bypass grafting for the treatment of critical ischaemia is worthwhile in selected patients with ESRD.     

Limb salvage in end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Comparison of modern results in patients with and without ESRD

We reviewed our experience with femoral-popliteal-tibial reversed vein bypasses performed for limb salvage in 226 patients without and 19 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). While 18-month primary patency rates were comparable (85% and 89%), limb salvage was significantly lower (76% vs 95%) in patients with ESRD. Five amputations in the ESRD group were required for nonhealing, large foot ulcers in diabetic patients despite patent arterial bypass while only five of 13 amputations in patients without ESRD were required in the presence of patent grafts. The need for major amputation despite patent bypass in diabetic patients with ESRD who have extensive foot gangrene or ischemic ulceration occurs sufficiently often that we recommend primary amputation be considered in these patients without regard to possible vascular reconstruction.     

Realistic expectations for pedal bypass grafts in patients with end-stage renal disease

Purpose: Limb-threatening ischemia in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) represents a challenging clinical problem. Multiple series have shown the inferior limb salvage rate for femoropopliteal or femorotibial bypass grafts in this group. This outcome study is restricted to those patients with ESRD who require pedal bypass grafts for attempted limb salvage. Methods: Between December 1, 1990, and December 31, 1997, 34 patients with ESRD underwent pedal bypass grafting on 41 limbs. This review explores the patient and bypass graft outcomes and their relationships to typical risk factors. Results: The average age in the study was 64 years (range, 39 to 85 years). Twenty patients (59%) were men, 31 (91%) had diabetes, 32 (94%) were hypertensive, and 28 (82%) had coronary artery disease, but only 10 patients (29%) were smokers. All the patients were undergoing dialysis except 2 patients with functioning renal transplants. All bypass grafting procedures were performed for limb salvage. The follow-up periods ranged from 1 to 84 months (average, 13.5 months). With life-table analysis, the cumulative assisted primary patency rate was 62% at 1 year and 62% at 2 years. The limb salvage rate was 56% and 50% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. All the patients who were seen with heel gangrene had early limb loss or died. Seven of the 16 amputations (44%) were performed despite patent bypass grafts. Ten of the 16 amputations (63%) occurred within 3 months of the surgery. The survival rate was 64% at 1 year and 52% at 2 years. After the bypass graft procedure, the mean ankle brachial index and the toe pressure rose from 0.48 to 1.05 and 18 to 86, respectively. Conclusion: Modest success can be expected with pedal bypass grafts in patients with ESRD, with most failures occurring in the first 3 months. Limb salvage rates lag behind graft patency rates because of progressive necrosis despite a hemodynamically functioning bypass graft. Heel gangrene is a strong predictor for a negative outcome. Lastly, overall patient survival rates are poor but comparable with the rates of other patients with ESRD. (J Vasc Surg 1998;28:976-83.)     

Meta-analysis of infrapopliteal angioplasty for chronic critical limb ischemia

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty has been used with increasing frequency in the treatment of infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the middle-term outcomes after crural angioplasty in patients with chronic critical limb ischemia and compare results with a meta-analysis of popliteal-to-distal vein bypass graft. METHODS: Data were retrieved from 30 articles published from 1990 through 2006 (63% of articles published between 2000 and 2006). All studies used survival analysis, reported a 12-month cumulative rate of patency or limb salvage, and included at least 15 infrapopliteal angioplasties. The outcome measures were immediate technical success, primary and secondary patency, limb salvage, and patient survival. Data from life-tables, survival curves, and texts were used. RESULTS: The pooled estimate of success was 89.0% +/- 2.2% for immediate technical result. Results at 1 and 36 months were 77.4% +/- 4.1% and 48.6% +/- 8.0% for primary patency, 83.3% +/- 1.4% and 62.9% +/- 11.0% for secondary patency, 93.4% +/- 2.3% and 82.4% +/- 3.4% for limb salvage, and 98.3% +/- 0.7% and 68.4% +/- 5.5% for patient survival, respectively. Studies with >75% of the limbs with tissue loss fared worse than their respective comparative subgroup for technical success and patency but not for limb salvage or survival. No publication bias was detected. CONCLUSION: The technical success and subsequent durability of crural angioplasty are limited compared with bypass surgery, but the clinical benefit is acceptable because limb salvage rates are equivalent to bypass surgery. Further studies are necessary to determine the proper role of infrapopliteal angioplasty.     

Patient recovery after infrainguinal bypass grafting for limb salvage

Purpose: The outcome of infrainguinal bypass surgery for limb salvage has traditionally been assessed by graft patency rates, limb salvage rates, and patient survival rates. Recently, functional outcome of limb salvage surgery has been assessed by patient ambulatory status and independent living status. These assessments fail to consider the adverse long-term patient effects of delayed wound healing, episodes of recurrent ischemia, and need for repeat operations. An ideal result of infrainguinal bypass surgery for limb salvage includes an uncomplicated operation, elimination of ischemia, prompt wound healing, and rapid return to premorbid functional status without recurrence or repeat surgery. The present study was performed to determine how often this ideal result is actually achieved. Methods: The records of 112 consecutive patients who underwent initial infrainguinal bypass surgery for limb salvage 5 to 7 years before the study were reviewed for operative complications, graft patency, limb salvage, survival, patient functional status, time to achieve wound healing, need for repeat operations, and recurrence of ischemia. Results: The mean patient age was 66 years. The mean postoperative follow-up was 42 months (range, 0 to 100.1 months). After operation 99 patients (88%) lived independently at home and 103 (92%) were ambulatory. There were seven perioperative deaths (6.3%), and wound complications occurred in 27 patients (24%). By life table, the assisted primary graft patency and limb salvage rates of the index extremity 5 years after operation were 77% and 87%, respectively, and the patient survival rate was 49%. At last follow-up or death, 73% of the patients (72 of 99) who lived independently at home before the operation were still living independently at home, and 70% (72 of 103) of those who were ambulatory before the operation remained ambulatory. Wound (operative and ischemic) healing required a mean of 4.2 months (range, 0.4 to 48 months), and 25 patients (22%) had not achieved complete wound healing at the time of last follow-up or death. Repeat operations to maintain graft patency, treat wound complications, or treat recurrent or contralateral ischemia were required in 61 patients (54%; mean, 1.6 reoperations/patient), and 26 patients (23.2%) ultimately required major limb amputation of the index or contralateral extremity. Only 16 of 112 patients (14.3%) achieved the ideal surgical result of an uncomplicated operation with long-term symptom relief, maintenance of functional status, and no recurrence or repeat operations. Conclusions: Most patients who undergo infrainguinal bypass surgery for limb salvage require ongoing treatment and have persistent or recurrent symptoms until their death. A significant minority have major tissue loss despite successful initial surgery. Clinically important palliation is frequently achieved by bypass surgery, but ideal results are distinctly infrequent. (J Vasc Surg 1998;27:256-66.)     

Limb salvage surgery in end stage renal disease: is it worthwhile?

The role of limb salvage surgery in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) is controversial. In view of this debate, we reviewed our experience with 54 primary and 15 secondary revascularizations for limb salvage in patients with ESRD over the past decade. Thirty-seven patients required dialysis and 10 had functioning renal transplants. Severe limb threatening ischemia was the indication for all revascularizations. The 2-year cumulative secondary graft patency rate was 56.2% with an associated limb salvage rate of 71.4%. There was no significant difference in graft patency or limb salvage rates between patients requiring dialysis and those with functioning renal allografts (p = 0.5). The 30-day operative mortality for the 99 surgical procedures (69 arterial bypasses and 30 additional operations) was 13% and the 2-year patient survival was 45.6%. Six of the 15 amputations were performed despite a patent graft on limbs which had extensive infection and gangrene. We conclude that limb salvage surgery should only be undertaken with recognition of these risks in patients with ESRD or functioning renal transplants. Surgery should be performed before gangrene and infection become extensive. Patients with unrelenting infection or mid-forefoot gangrene should be considered for primary amputation.     

Pedal branch artery bypass: a viable limb salvage option

PURPOSE: We reviewed our experience with pedal branch artery (PBA) bypass to confirm the role of these target arteries for limb salvage and to identify patient and technical factors that may be associated with graft patency and limb salvage. METHODS: In this retrospective study we analyzed 24 vein grafts to PBAs performed from 1988 to 1998 for limb salvage in 23 patients who had no suitable tibial, peroneal, or dorsal pedal target arteries. These PBA grafts were compared with 133 perimalleolar posterior tibial, defined at or below the ankle, or dorsalis pedis bypass grafts performed contemporaneously; the Kaplan-Meier life table was used in the analysis of graft patency and limb salvage. Life table analyses and logistic regression analysis of prognostic patient variables were also performed. RESULTS: The PBA bypass represented 3% of infrainguinal revascularizations for chronic critical limb ischemia at our institution over the study period. Patients who received PBA bypasses were more likely to be male (92% vs. 69%, P =.02) with lower incidences of overt coronary artery disease (33% vs. 50%, P =.12) and stroke (0% vs 15%, P =.04), and a higher incidence of end-stage renal disease (21% vs 8%, P =.06) than those undergoing perimalleolar bypass. Seventeen percent of PBA bypasses were performed with the anterior lateral malleolar artery, a vessel not previously described as a common bypass target. Two-year primary patency and limb salvage for PBA versus perimalleolar bypass was 70% versus 80% (P =.16) and 78% versus 91% (P = .28), respectively. Patency and limb salvage rates were no different in bypasses with above-knee or below-knee inflow arteries. CONCLUSION: An autogenous vein bypass to the PBA, though rarely required, provides acceptable primary patency and limb salvage when compared with perimalleolar tibial artery bypass when no suitable, more proximal target arteries are available. The PBA bypass should be considered before major amputation is undertaken.     

Potential predictors of outcome in patients with tissue loss who undergo infrainguinal vein bypass grafting.

PURPOSE: Aggressive attempts at limb salvage in patients with ischemic tissue loss are justified by favorable initial results in most patients. The identification of patients whose conditions will not benefit from attempted revascularization remains difficult. METHODS: This study was designed as a retrospective review of prospectively collected clinical data. The subjects were 210 consecutive patients who underwent infrainguinal vein bypass grafting for ischemic tissue loss in the setting of an academic medical center. Bypass grafting was to the popliteal artery in 56 patients, to the infrapopliteal arteries in 131 patients, and to the pedal arteries in 23 patients. The follow-up examination was complete in 209 of 210 patients. One hundred twenty-five patients underwent blinded review of duplex scan venous mapping and arteriography to determine simplified vein and run-off scores. The outcome measures were the influence of risk factors, venous conduit, and runoff on mortality, limb loss, and graft failure at the 6-month follow-up examination. RESULTS: One hundred seventy patients (81%) were alive and had limb salvage. Nineteen patients (9.1%) died, with need for a simultaneous inflow procedure and end-stage renal disease being most commonly associated with mortality. Thirty-three patients (15.8%) had undergone amputation: 18 after graft failure, and 15 for progressive tissue loss despite a patent graft. Amputation was significantly more common in patients with diabetes (P =.05) and with poor runoff scores (poor runoff, 44.4% vs good runoff, 7.4%; P <.01). Amputation despite a patent graft also correlated with runoff (poor runoff, 41.7% vs good runoff, 4.3%; P <.01). Twenty-five patients had graft failure without amputation, so that only 145 patients (69.4%) were alive, had limb salvage, and had a patent graft. Run-off score was the strongest predictor of outcome, with 70% of patients with poor run-off scores having death, amputation, or graft failure. CONCLUSION: Aggressive use of infrainguinal vein bypass grafting in patients with ischemic tissue loss results in a high rate of initial limb salvage but significant morbidity and mortality. Arteriographically determined runoff scores appear to potentially identify patients at high risk for a poor initial outcome and may provide a method of selecting patients for primary amputation.     

Early experience with popliteal to infrapopliteal bypass for limb salvage

In an attempt to improve graft patency and limb salvage in patients with isolated tibial vessel and/or popliteal-tibial vessel occlusive disease, bypass grafts from the popliteal or distal superficial femoral artery to infrapopliteal arteries were used in patients requiring bypass for limb salvage. During a 2 1/2-year period, 23 patients with patent axial vessels and hemodynamically normal inflow to the level of the knee underwent such bypasses. Cumulative graft patency and limb salvage rates at 31 months were 84% and 70%, respectively. Five of the six patients who required below-knee amputation did so because of progressive gangrene in the presence of a patent bypass. Short bypasses between the popliteal and infrapopliteal arteries can significantly contribute to limb salvage in patients with tibial vessel occlusive disease and may be particularly useful in patients with saphenous veins too short for longer bypasses.     

Is lower extremity revascularization worthwhile in patients with end-stage renal disease?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to review the results of lower extremity revascularization in patients with end-stage renal disease and to determine in these patients the functional benefit and cost of an aggressive approach to limb preservation. METHODS: During a 5-year period at our institution, 33 bypass operations were performed on 31 limbs of 23 dialysis-dependent patients. Indications for revascularization were limited (18) or extensive (12) tissue loss or ischemia without tissue loss (3). Procedures included aortobifemoral bypass (1), femoropopliteal bypass (10), and femorotibial/pedal bypass (22). A digital or transmetatarsal amputation was performed in 57% of limbs. RESULTS: The 30-day primary patency was 100%. Cumulative primary and secondary patency rates at 2 years were 65% and 79%, respectively. Limb salvage was 67% and 59% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Patient survival was poor (47% at 2 years). Peritoneal dialysis was predictive of poor survival (P <.001). Four of 5 patients on peritoneal dialysis died within 3 months of intervention. Extensive tissue loss was predictive of a diminished rate of limb salvage (P =.027). Only 39% of limbs with extensive tissue loss were salvaged at 1 year compared with 78% and 100% of limbs with limited and no tissue loss, respectively. The average hospital cost was $44,308 per year of limb salvage. CONCLUSIONS: Although revascularization of ischemic limbs in dialysis patients can be achieved with an excellent initial graft patency and reasonable limb salvage, patient survival is poor and costs are high. A selective approach to revascularization in these complicated patients may be indicated. For patients treated with peritoneal dialysis and for those with extensive tissue loss, primary amputation may be the preferred approach.     

Early experience utilizing the in situ saphenous vein technique in 54 patients

We have compared our early and late experience utilizing in situ saphenous vein bypass graft for lower extremity arterial occlusive disease in 54 patients who underwent in situ femoral to popliteal and distal bypass grafts between July of 1983 and February 1985. There were 3 femoral to above-knee popliteal bypasses, 27 femoral to below-knee popliteal bypass grafts, 12 femoral to anterior tibial dorsalis pedis bypass grafts, 10 femoral to posterior tibial bypass grafts and 2 femoral to peroneal in situ bypass grafts. The operative indications were progressive disabling claudication in 8 (15%) and limb salvage in 46 (85%). Eighty-nine percent of the limb salvage patients had 0-1 vessel runoff by arteriogram. Cumulative life table patency of the 54 in situ bypass grafts was 79% at 20 months. One hundred percent of the patients who were operated on for disabling claudication had patent grafts at 20 months. Seventy-eight percent of the limb salvage patients had patent grafts. Fourteen of the limb salvage patients required amputation and of these 14, 10 had patent grafts at the time of amputation. There were 8 deaths in the series. Our results demonstrate that a definite learning curve exists with this technique, however, once established, long-term patency and improved limb salvage statistics can be obtained.     

Infrainguinal revascularization in end-stage renal disease

Patients with end-stage renal disease are being maintained for longer periods with dialysis or renal transplantation. Although renal failure itself is associated with occlusive peripheral vascular disease, such patients often have additional comorbid risk factors. In this series, 88% of patients were diabetic, 93% were hypertensive, and 44% were smokers, all factors that exacerbate the severity of their vasculopathy. As a consequence, the vascular surgeon is increasingly being confronted with limb-threatening peripheral vascular disease in this population. We performed 34 infrainguinal bypasses in 27 patients during an 8-year period from 1986 to 1993. Fifty percent of these were bypasses to the infrapopliteal level. The 12- and 48-month graft patency was 64% and 38%, respectively, by life-table analysis. The limb salvage rate was 65% and 58% at 12 and 48 months. The perioperative mortality rate was 5.9% and the morbidity rate was 37%. Most of the limb loss (66%) occurred during the first 3 months after surgery as a result of acute graft occlusion or nonhealing of an ulcer or minor amputation site. We believe that this reflects an increasingly aggressive approach to limb salvage in patients with end-stage renal disease. Four limbs were lost despite a patent graft. Infrainguinal bypass is a viable management option for limb salvage in patients with end-stage renal disease. These procedures can be undertaken with acceptable perioperative mortality and with a 12-month limb salvage rate of 65%.Presented at the Eighteenth Annual Meeting of the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society, Washington, D.C., June 6, 1993.     

Infrainguinal bypass grafting in patients with end-stage renal disease: improving outcomes?

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to examine recent trends in the outcomes of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing infrainguinal bypass grafting (IBG) with autogenous vein. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all IBGs performed on patients with ESRD at a single tertiary care institution during the interval 1993 to 1999 was undertaken. The comparison groups consisted of concurrent series of patients with elevated creatinine (creatinine level > 1.2 mg/dL) and patients with normal renal function undergoing IBG. Procedural variables, angiographic runoff scores, and extent of tissue necrosis at presentation were correlated with outcome. Categoric parameters were compared with chi(2) analysis; rates were computed with life-table analysis. RESULTS: Of an overall cohort of 622 IBGs performed during this interval, 78 IBGs (12.5%) were performed on 60 patients with ESRD, with a perioperative mortality rate of 1.3% that was comparable to controls. All reconstructions in the ESRD cohort were for limb salvage indications. Four-year survival, primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates for the ESRD group were 51% +/- 9%, 60% +/- 11%, 86% +/- 5%, and 86% +/- 5%, respectively; these were not statistically different from the control groups. Limb salvage in the ESRD group was 77% +/- 6% at 4 years and was significantly less then either the elevated creatinine (92% +/- 4%; P <.02) or the normal renal function group (90% +/- 2%: P <.02). Of 16 amputations in the ESRD group, nine were performed in limbs with patent grafts. The only absolute predictor of limb loss despite a patent graft was the presence of a heel ulcer more than 4 cm in diameter. Age, runoff score of the International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, isolated tibial bypass graft, and location of distal anastomosis were not predictive of hemodynamic failure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ESRD constitute an increasing proportion of patients undergoing IBG in a tertiary care setting. Four-year survival, perioperative mortality, and graft patency rates are similar to patients with normal renal function and support an aggressive approach to this population. Major limb amputation despite a patent graft remains a problem of unique frequency in patients with ESRD. Adequate predictors of hemodynamic failure of IBG in this group do not exist, although a heel ulcer more than 4 cm may indicate an unsalvageable foot.     

Pedal branch arterial bypass for limb salvage

In patients with critical lower extremity ischemia and occlusion of the distal tibial and pedal arteries bypasses to pedal artery branches may offer the only alternative to primary amputation. The results of 22 pedal branch arterial bypasses are reported, and a review of the literature is offered. The charts of 22 patients undergoing pedal branch arterial bypass during a 12-year period were retrospectively reviewed. The results of six additional reports of this technique were also evaluated. In the present series the cumulative primary graft patency rate was 72 per cent after 2 years. The cumulative limb salvage rate during this interval was 82 per cent. Similar graft patency and limb salvage rates were obtained with the approximately 200 other bypasses of this nature as reported in six other series. Pedal branch arterial bypass offers limb salvage results that are comparable to perimalleolar and pedal artery bypasses. In patients with critical limb ischemia and occlusion of distal tibial and pedal arteries, pedal artery branches should be sought as potential outflow sites. Bypasses to these arteries result in good long-term limb salvage, improved survival, and good functional ability for amputation. Pedal artery branch bypasses are a superior alternative to primary amputation.     

Pedal bypass with deep venous arterialization: the therapeutic option in critical limb ischemia and unreconstructable distal arteries

Heavily calcified and severely stenotic distal arteries defined as unreconstructable, precludes the possibility of revascularization, resulting in major amputation in patients with critical limb ischemia. However, providing blood supply to the ischemic foot through the venous system instead of the arterial system may improve the circulation adequately for the healing process in the vascular compromised distal tissue. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of pedal bypass with deep venous arterialization, one of the possible procedures to improve the circulation through the venous system in critically ischemic limbs and unreconstructable distal arteries. Twenty-six patients with critical limb ischemia and an unreconstructable distal artery of the lower extremities were included for the surgical procedure. Arterial bypass with distal anastomosis at the paramalleolar deep vein was carried out through a composite graft combined with adequate destruction of valve competency in the distal vein. The primary endpoint was complete healing of ischemic ulcer with amelioration of rest pain within six months. The secondary endpoints were the outcomes of survival, limb salvage and primary graft patency rate at six-month intervals to 24 months. Nineteen patients (73.1%) had complete healing of ischemic ulcer and disappearance of rest pain within six months. Six patients (23.1%) underwent major amputation. Perioperative mortality was 3.8%. After 24 months of follow-up study, the survival rate was 87.5%, whereas the limb salvage and graft patency rates were 76.02 and 49.17%, respectively. Pedal bypass with deep venous arterialization may be another therapeutic option to enhance the healing of ischemic ulcer and limb salvageability in patients with critical limb ischemia and unreconstructable distal artery.     

Below-knee revascularization in patients with critical limb ischemia: long-term comparison of redo vs primary interventions

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the authors' experience in below-knee revascularization in patients with critical limb ischemia, comparing long-term outcomes in primary and secondary interventions. METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2006, 140 consecutive below-knee revascularizations in patients with critical limb ischemia were performed at the Department of Vascular Surgery of the University of Florence (Italy). In 105 patients (75%) a primary intervention was performed (Group 1). Early and long-term results in terms of survival, patency and limb salvage were compared with those obtained in the remaining 35 patients (25%) secondarily operated on in the same period for a late (>30 days) bypass graft thrombosis (Group 2). RESULTS: One patient died in the early postoperative period. Thirty-day thrombosis and amputation rates were poorer in Group 2 than in Group 1 (17.1% and 4.8%, P=0.02; 37.1% and 16.2%, P=0.01, respectively). Mean duration of follow-up was 25.1 months. At 60 months there were no differences between the two groups in terms of survival (90.1% in Group 1 and 90.9% in Group 2; P=NS), primary patency (43.5% in Group 1 and 31.9% in Group 2; P=NS) and secondary patency (48.4% in Group 1 vs 43.8% in Group 2; P=NS). Estimated 60-month limb salvage rate was significantly poorer in Group 2 than in Group 1 (64.1% and 77.7%, respectively; P=0.05). In Group 2 prosthetic graft material significantly affects 60-month limb salvage rate. CONCLUSION: Redo below-knee revascularization in patients with critical limb ischemia provides acceptable long-term results in terms of primary and secondary patency; however, limb salvage appeared to be slightly worse in patients undergone redo surgery.     

Critical analysis of clinical success after surgical bypass for lower-extremity ischemic tissue loss using a standardized definition combining multiple parameters: a new paradigm of outcomes assessment

BACKGROUND: Success after surgical revascularization of the lower extremities, traditionally defined by graft patency or limb salvage, fails to consider other intuitive measures of importance. The purpose of the study was to construct a more comprehensive definition of clinical success and to identify clinical predictors of failure. STUDY DESIGN: For the purpose of this study, clinical success was defined as achieving all of the following criteria: graft patency to the point of wound healing; limb salvage for 1 year; maintenance of ambulatory status for 1 year; and survival for 6 months. Between 1998 and 2004, 331 consecutive patients undergoing bypass for Rutherford III critical limb ischemia were measured for clinical success. Bivariate and logistic regression analyses were performed to determine demographic differences between success and failure. RESULTS: Despite achieving acceptable graft patency (72.7% at 36 months) and limb salvage (73.3% at 36 months), clinical success combining all 4 defined parameters was only 44.4%. Independent predictors of failure included impaired ambulatory status at presentation (odds ratio [OR] = 6.44), presence of infrainguinal disease (OR = 3.93), end-stage renal disease (OR = 2.48), presence of gangrene (OR = 2.40), and hyperlipidemia (OR = 0.56). Probability of failure in patients possessing every predictor except hyperlipidemia at presentation was 97% (OR = 150.6). CONCLUSIONS: Despite achieving acceptable graft patency and limb salvage, fewer than half of the patients achieved success when using a definition combining multiple parameters. A reappraisal of our current approach to critical limb ischemia in certain high-risk patients is warranted.     

Increased preoperative c-reactive protein level as a prognostic factor for postoperative amputation after femoropopliteal bypass surgery for CLI

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We evaluated the possible predictive role of C-reactive protein (CRP) on the immediate postoperative outcome after femoropopliteal bypass surgery for critical leg ischaemia (CLI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: 138 patients with CLI who underwent 143 femoropopliteal reconstructions. RESULTS: The immediate postoperative period secondary patency rate was 87%, leg salvage rate was 94%, and survival rate 97%. Nine patients (6.3%) had 30-day postoperative major amputation, three of them despite a patent bypass graft because of progression of foot infection. The preoperative serum concentration of CRP was the only predictor of postoperative major amputation (p = 0.004; for an increase of 10 mg/l: OR, 1.188; CI 95%, 1.059-1.332). The median preoperative serum concentration of CRP among patients who did not have major amputation was 13.0 mg/l (range, 1-185), whereas it was 47.5 mg/l (range, 5-168) among those who had amputation after bypass graft occlusion, and 115.0 mg/l (range, 34-222) among those who had amputation despite a patent bypass graft (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: CRP may be a useful marker in risk stratification for postoperative amputation in patients undergoing femoropopliteal bypass surgery for CLI.     

Patency and limb salvage after infrainguinal bypass with severely compromised ("blind") outflow

HYPOTHESIS: Infrainguinal graft patency and limb salvage are adversely affected by severely compromised outflow. DESIGN: Retrospective review of all infrainguinal bypass procedures performed at a single institution during a 5-year period. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Two hundred seventy-four patients underwent infrainguinal bypass for limb salvage (351 grafts in 307 limbs). INTERVENTIONS: All infrainguinal bypasses originated from a femoral artery. The distal anastomosis in 279 grafts was located in an artery with at least 1 patent outflow vessel with anatomically normal end-artery runoff (Society for Vascular Surgery/International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery ad hoc committee runoff score, 1-9). The distal anastomosis of 72 grafts was located in an artery with only collateral outflow ("blind bypass"; runoff score, 10). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative morbidity and mortality, primary-assisted and secondary graft patency, limb salvage, and survival. RESULTS: All data are presented as mean +/- SEM. Patients undergoing blind bypass were older (age, 70 +/- 2 vs. 66 +/- 1 years; P <.05) and had a higher incidence of hypertension (90% vs 70%; P <.05) and end-stage renal disease (24% vs. 13%; P <.05). Comparing patients undergoing blind bypass to bypass with at least 1 patent outflow vessel, there were no differences in the use of nonautogenous conduits (50% vs 59%; P =.21) or postoperative warfarin (30% vs 32%; P =.69), or in perioperative mortality rates (2.7% vs 3.2%; P =.79). After a median follow-up of 13 months (range, 0-60 months), 2-year secondary graft patency for the entire group was 63% +/- 4%. The secondary patency rate of blind bypass grafts was no different from that of grafts with at least 1 patent outflow vessel (67% +/- 7% vs. 64% +/- 4%; P was not significant). However, the 2-year limb salvage rate in limbs with blind outflow was significantly worse than in limbs with at least 1 patent outflow vessel (67% +/- 7% vs. 76% +/- 3%; P =.04). CONCLUSION: Acceptable long-term patency rates can be achieved in infrainguinal bypass grafts with blind outflow, although blind outflow remains a marker for subsequent limb loss in the chronically ischemic leg.     

Subscapular artery Y-shaped flow-through muscle flap: a novel one-stage limb salvage procedure

OBJECTIVES: Major tissue loss caused by the critical limb ischemia requires improvement of distal perfusion and cover of large tissue defects. We propose a new method, the y-shaped subscapular artery flow-through (Y-SCAFT) muscle flap using the subscapular artery that yields an arterial graft and a free muscle flap sustained by a collateral branch of this artery. This prospective study evaluated the feasibility of this technique and analyzed wound healing, graft patency, and limb salvage. METHODS: Between 2002 and 2007, 20 patients, mean age 64 years (range, 55-79 years), were treated with this technique. All presented with critical ischemia and major tissue loss, with exposure of the tendons, bones, or joint, and were candidates for major amputation. Revascularization and cover of tissue loss with the same Y-SCAFT anatomic unit was used for all patients. The distal anastomosis was performed between the distal branch of the Y-SCAFT and the pedal artery in 9, posterior tibial artery in 4, peroneal artery in 1, lateral tarsal artery in 3, and the plantar artery in 3. In four patients, the distal part of the arterial graft, including the anastomosis, was covered with the muscle flap because the tissue loss was nearby. The proximal anastomosis was performed between a leg artery and the arterial graft in 10 patients. A venous graft was necessary in 10 patients to extend the bypass proximally. RESULTS: One patient died during the postoperative period. Duplex control evidenced patency all the Y-SCAFT muscle flaps. Healing was achieved in all patients. Mean follow-up was 31 months (range, 6-58 months). No patients died during follow-up. One patient presented occlusion of the Y-SCAFT muscle flap and underwent amputated. One patient had major amputation despite a patent graft. At 2 years, leg salvage was 85%, patency was 94%, and survival was 94%. At the end of the follow-up, 17 patients (1 death, 2 amputations) had a patent graft, a viable muscle flap, wound healing, and a functional leg. CONCLUSION: We showed the clinical feasibility of the technique of Y-SCAFT muscle flap, which allows for revascularization and cover of major tissue loss with one anatomic unit. This method is particularly useful in selected cases with poor run-off and large ischemic lesions.