Epidemiology of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

The prevalence of heart failure (HF) and its subtype, HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), is on the rise due to aging of the population. HFpEF is convergence of several pathophysiological processes, which are not yet clearly identified. HFpEF is usually seen in association with systemic diseases, such as diabetes, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, sleep apnea, renal and pulmonary disease. The proportion of HF patients with HFpEF varies by patient demographics, study settings (cohort vs. clinical trial, outpatient clinics vs. hospitalised patients) and cut points used to define preserved function. There is an expanding body of literature about prevalence and prognostic significance of both cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular comorbidities in HFpEF patients. Current therapeutic approaches are targeted towards alleviating the symptoms, treating the associated comorbid conditions, and reducing recurrent hospital admissions. There is lack of evidence-based therapies that show a reduction in the mortality amongst HFpEF patients; however, an improvement in exercise tolerance and quality of life is seen with few interventions. In this review, we highlight the epidemiology and current treatment options for HFpEF.     

Medical Therapy for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a challenging disease state that has long been plagued by heterogeneity in diagnostic criteria and underlying etiologies. Due in part to the complexity of defining this disease and the simplistic approach of only studying medications that have shown significant improvement in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, there have been a multitude of negative trials in this population. In the past few years, however, there have been medications that have finally shown to benefit patients with HFpEF. In particular, the blockbuster class of medications called SGLT2 inhibitors have provided a treatment option that improves outcomes in this group of patients. There is increasing focus on HFpEF research that aims to improve the phenotyping of these patients to more successfully tailor therapy and improve patient outcomes.     

Circulating Biomarkers in Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF) comprise a growing proportion of the overall HF burden. The pathophysiology of HF-PEF is complex, and relates to the interplay between cardiac risk factors (notably diabetes/insulin resistance, hypertension), systemic inflammation, and comorbid medical illness (e.g. chronic kidney disease) that conspire to promote endothelial dysfunction, ventricular-vascular stiffening, and diastolic dysfunction. Efficient diagnosis and optimal therapy remain challenging in this population. Imaging, electrocardiographic, and circulating biomarkers, as well as pharmacogenetics, may help to facilitate HF diagnosis, stratify risk, and individualize therapy. In this review, we focus on established and emerging circulating biomarkers in HF-PE, including circulating biomarkers of myocyte stress, myocyte injury, renal function, systemic inflammation, and fibrosis. Such markers have contributed to better understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms relevant to HF-PEF, and may eventually help to facilitate more effective and personalized management of this syndrome.     

Heart Failure with Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

Background

The prevalence and clinical outcomes of heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction have not been well elucidated.

Objective

To analyze the prevalence of heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction in acute myocardial infarction and its association with mortality.

Methods

Patients with acute myocardial infarction (n = 1,474) were prospectively included. Patients without heart failure (Killip score = 1), with heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (Killip score > 1 and left ventricle ejection fraction ≥ 50%), and with systolic dysfunction (Killip score > 1 and left ventricle ejection fraction < 50%) on admission were compared. The association between systolic dysfunction with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and in-hospital mortality was tested in adjusted models.

Results

Among the patients included, 1,256 (85.2%) were admitted without heart failure (72% men, 67 ± 15 years), 78 (5.3%) with heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (59% men, 76 ± 14 years), and 140 (9.5%) with systolic dysfunction (69% men, 76 ± 14 years), with mortality rates of 4.3%, 17.9%, and 27.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). Logistic regression (adjusted for sex, age, troponin, diabetes, and body mass index) demonstrated that heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (OR 2.91; 95% CI 1.35–6.27; p = 0.006) and systolic dysfunction (OR 5.38; 95% CI 3.10 to 9.32; p < 0.001) were associated with in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion

One-third of patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted with heart failure had preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Although this subgroup exhibited more favorable outcomes than those with systolic dysfunction, this condition presented a three-fold higher risk of death than the group without heart failure. Patients with acute myocardial infarction and heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction encounter elevated short-term risk and require special attention and monitoring during hospitalization.     

Update on Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) is the most common form of heart failure (HF) in older adults, and is increasing in prevalence as the population ages. Morbidity and long-term mortality in HFPEF are substantial and can be similar to HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF), yet HFPEF therapy remains empirical and treatment guidelines are based primarily on expert consensus. Neurohormonal blockade has revolutionized the management of HFREF, but trials in HFPEF based on this strategy have been disappointing to date. However, many recent studies have increased knowledge about HFPEF. The concept of HFPEF has evolved from a ‘cardio-centric’ model to a syndrome that may involve multiple cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mechanisms. Emerging data highlight the importance of non-pharmacological management strategies and assessment of non-cardiovascular comorbidities. Animal models, epidemiological cohorts, and small human studies suggest that oxidative stress and inflammation contribute to HFPEF, potentially leading to development of new therapeutic targets.