The First Year Renal Function as a Predictor of Long-Term Graft Survival After Kidney Transplantation

This study examined the impact of graft function at the end of the first year after kidney transplantation on long-term graft survival. We analyzed the roles of serum creatinine (Scr) and other variables as predictors of graft survival among 235 adult kidney transplant patients. The subjects were divided into 3 groups according to their Scr at the end of the first year: group 1, Scr < 100 μmol/L; group 2, 100 μmol/L ≤ Scr ≤ 150 μmol/L; and group 3, Scr >150 μmol/L. The annual rate of graft loss of 0.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.77) in group 1, was lower than those in group 2 (2.1%; 95% CI, 2.02-2.18; P < .0001) and group 3 (6%; 5.74-6.26; P < .0001). Regression analysis showed the role of recipient age at the time of operation, and Scr level at the end of the first year to be independent predictors of graft loss. Graft survival was not influenced by any other studied parameter, including donor age, year of procedure, warm ischemia time, history of acute tubular necrosis, and occurrence of an acute rejection episode. We conclude that the 1-year Scr value predicts long-term renal graft survival, representing a simple, practical tool to identify recipients with an high risk for late graft failure.     

Risk Factors Associated With Graft Loss and Patient Survival After Kidney Transplantation

Objective

To evaluate the influence of traditional risk factors on major kidney transplantation outcome.

Patients and Methods

Data from kidney transplantation procedures performed between 2003 and 2006 were retrospectively analyzed for the influence of traditional risk factors on transplantation outcome. Of 2364 transplants, 67% were from living donors, 27% were from donors who met standard criteria, and 6% were from donor who met expanded criteria. Two hundred thirty-nine procedures (10%) were performed in pediatric patients. Immunosuppression was selected on the basis of subgroup population.

Results

At 1 year posttransplantation, cumulative freedom from a treated acute rejection episode (ARE) was 76.7%, with no difference between black vs nonblack recipients (75.0% vs 73.4%; P = .79). At 2 years, survival for patients (95.3% vs 88.3% vs 82.1%; P < .001) and grafts 92.3% vs 80.3% vs 70.9%; P < .001) was better in recipients of living donor grafts compared with donors who met standard or expanded criteria, respectively. Moreover, graft survival was poorer in black vs nonblack patients (83.6% vs 88.7%; P < .05) because of high mortality (13% vs 7%; P<.001). Risk factors associated with death included cadaveric donor organ (odds ratio [OR], 2.4) and black race (OR, 1.8), and risk factors associated with graft loss included cadaveric donor organ (OR, 2.1), extended-criteria criteria donor organ (OR, 2.0), delayed graft function (OR, 1.8), and any ARE (OR, 3.5). At 6 months posttransplantation, risk factors associated with death included cadaveric donor organ (OR, 2.5) or ARE (OR, 2.4), and risk factors associated with graft loss included cadaveric donor organ (OR, 2.0), extended-criteria donor organ (OR, 2.6), ARE (OR, 9.5), and impaired graft function (creatinine concentration >1.5 mg/dL; OR, 2.1).

Conclusion

Traditional risk factors are still associated with transplantation outcome. Poorer graft survival in black vs nonblack recipients was due to higher mortality rather than graft loss.     

Kidney Transplantation: Improvement in Patient and Graft Survival

Patient and graft survival were reviewed in a series of 249 kidney transplants done from 1963 to March 1973. Patient survival was calculated by the life table method for the periods 1963-1970, and 1970-1973, since in 1970 a formal Kidney Center was established and mortality rates changed. Graft survival was analyzed in terms of donor source, HL-A matching and immune responsiveness to HL-A antigens. Three-year predicted mortality for cadaver kidney recipients was 62% between 1963 and 1969 (42 patients) and 8% between 1970 anid 1973 (67 patients). Similar predicted mortality for related living donors was 30% between 1963 and 1969 (52 patients) and 14% between 1970 and 1973 (85 patients). Mortality has continued to decrease and there has been only one death in the last 87 consecutive transplants, including 57 consecutive cadaver transplants. Oneyear predicted kidney survival for the 10-year period is 44% for cadaveric, 60% for non HL-A identical related living and 90% for HL-A identical sibling donors. In the cadaver group, those sharing 2 or more HL-A antigens had the same kidney survival as the non HL-A identical related living donor grafts. Since cadaver graft recipients are on dialysis for a longer period of time, immune responsiveness can be detected by their response to blood transfusions, whereas this determination could not be made in our related living donor group. Non-responsive cadaver kidney recipients had 80% one year kidney survival. We conclude that transplant mortality can be reduced to less than 10% by the Center approach to treatment of renal disease, dialysis does not adversely affect future transplantation, and excellent (80%) kidney survival can be expected in properly selected cadaver graft recipients.     

Patient Survival and Cardiovascular Risk After Kidney Transplantation: The Challenge of Diabetes

An increasing proportion of kidney recipients have diabetes mellitus (DM). Herein, we assessed the impact of DM on morbidity and mortality. The study included 933 recipients of first transplants. DM was present in 212 (23%). Compared to non-diabetics (NoDM), DM were older, heavier and had more pretransplant cardiovascular (CV) disease (16% vs. 48%, p < 0.0001). DM had reduced survival (5 years, 93% vs. 70%, p < 0.0001) and higher incidence of CV events (9% vs. 37%, p < 0.0001). CV disease was the most common cause of death in DM (61%) but not in NoDM (26%). Mortality from infections was also higher in DM (p = 0.001). In NoDM, survival related to recipient age (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.07, p < 0.0001) and dialysis pretransplant HR = 2.21, p = 0.01, while in DM, survival related to dialysis (HR = 2.89, p = 0.01) and pretransplant CV disease (HR = 2.79, p = 0.007). In NoDM, the incidence of posttransplant CV events was related to traditional CV risk factors, while in DM only the pretransplant CV history related to this outcome. In conclusion, survival differs between NoDM and DM recipients quantitatively, by cause of death and by risk factors. In NoDM, survival is excellent, and the main threat to survival relates to immunosuppression. In DM, survival is inferior primarily due to CV disease generally present prior to transplantation.     

Early Urine Output Predicts Graft Survival After Kidney Transplantation

Background

In kidney transplantations, the identification of early postoperative parameters with high predictive power for the development of late allograft dysfunction has important implications for clinical practice. This study sought to determine these parameters in a single-center cohort.

Methods

We studied 82 deceased donor renal transplantation. We assessed the following measures: dialysis-dependent delayed graft function (ddDGF), extended DGF, serum creatinine level at day 7, creatinine reduction ratio at day 7, urine output at day 1 and at day 7 posttransplantation (UO7).

Results

Only UO7 showed a significant result upon multivariate analysis (P < .0001). It was less influenced by dialysis with respect to measures based upon serum creatinine. By Receiver Operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, it showed an elevated area under the curve (0.811), with a cut-off value of 500 mL/24 h, showing high sensitivity (98.5%).

Conclusions

UO7 may be of clinical utility to assess the risk for subsequent renal dysfunction.     

Resistance Index Measured by Doppler Ultrasound as a Predictor of Graft Function After Kidney Transplantation

IntroductionDoppler ultrasound (US) has become the primary imaging technique for the evaluation of renal transplants. It provides information about the intrarenal resistance index (RI). A high RI is seen in every form of graft dysfunction. In this article, we review the utility of sonography, particularly the intrarenal RI measured early after renal transplant, as a predictor of acute and chronic clinical outcome in patients.ResultsRI is a valuable marker to determine graft function and related vascular complications. It reveals a strong correlation with serum creatinine levels measured days after transplant. Its elevation is typical for acute tubular necrosis and can be used to predict its duration. An RI >1 (absent end-diastolic flow) seen in the first weeks after transplant is associated with impaired renal graft recovery. In addition, it is an early predictor of chronic allograft nephropathy (even correlated with biopsy results), which will allow a change in therapy.ConclusionsRI measured serially in the early period after kidney transplantation is a valuable marker for determining renal graft function. It is also useful for demonstrating various types of graft dysfunction; however, it cannot differentiate between them. In recent studies, extrarenal factors in kidney transplantation (eg, recipient's age) may significantly influence RI in the recipient, demonstrating that RI depends on the vascular characteristics of the recipient and not on the graft itself.     

Age Matching Improves Graft Survival After Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

Background

Donor and recipient age in kidney transplantation are known to affect graft and patient survival. To address the question of whether the age difference between donor and recipient impacts on graft survival and death-censored graft survival after transplantation, we examined the impact of age matching (less than 10-year age difference) on the survivals after living donor kidney transplantation.

Methods

Two hundred one cases of the primary living donor kidney transplantation were performed and were divided into two groups, age-matched (n = 123) versus age-discrepant (n = 78). Variables included in this study were age, gender, body weight, height, kidney disease, type and duration of dialysis before transplantation, degree of human leukocyte antigen mismatch, ischemic time, graft weight, episode of rejection, type of immunosuppression, recipient serum creatinine after transplantation, and causes of patient death and graft loss.

Results

We observed the disparities of graft survival (P = .008) and death-censored graft survival (P = .003) between the groups. One-, 3-, and 5-year death-censored graft survival was 100%, 100%, and 97% in the age-matched group, respectively; and 97%, 90%, and 88% in the age-discrepant group, respectively. By Cox regression multivariate analysis, the variable of age-matching was an independent predictor for both graft survival (ß = 1.325, P = .017) and death-censored graft survival (ß = 2.217, P = .021).

Conclusion

During living donor and recipient matching, age difference between donor and recipient should be minimized.     

Obesity, Adiponectin and Inflammation as Predictors of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus After Kidney Transplantation

The high incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT) suggests the need to find new factors to explain the pathogenesis. Our objectives were (1) to confirm that low levels of pre-transplant adiponectin are an independent risk factor for the development of NODAT in a larger transplanted population; (2) to analyze whether adiponectin is a better predictor of NODAT than other inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A)) and (3) to assess the relationship between obesity, inflammatory markers and NODAT. One hundred ninety-nine non-diabetic patients (128 men; age: 53 +/- 11 years; body mass index (BMI) 24.98 +/- 3.76 kg/m2) were included. Pre-transplant plasma glucose, insulin, adiponectin, CRP, TNF-alpha, IL-6 and PAPP-A were measured. Forty-five patients developed NODAT. Patients with NODAT had a greater BMI (p = 0.005). Adiponectin was lower (p < 0.001) and CRP higher (p = 0.032) in patients with NODAT. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox analysis showed that the calcineurin inhibitor used, pre-transplant BMI and adiponectin were predictors of NODAT. ROC analysis showed that an adiponectin concentration of 11.4 microg/mL had a significant negative prediction for NODAT risk (sensitivity: 81% and specificity: 70%). Of the inflammatory markers studied, adiponectin proved to be an independent predictor of NODAT.     

The Impact of Method on Kidney Graft and Patient Survival in Kidney-Pancreas Transplantations for Type I Diabetes Mellitus

Patients who develop end-stage renal disease (ESRD) associated with Type I Diabetes Mellitus may receive kidney alone (KA) transplantation, simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation, or a pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplantation. The goal of this study is to examine the long-term impact of pancreas transplantation on kidney graft and patient survival rates. A total of 85 transplantation cases, consisting of 30 that received living donor KA, 21 that received SPK, and 34 that received PAK, from 2003–2010 at Akdeniz University Organ Transplantation Institute were retrospectively screened. There was a graft loss in 4 cases from the KA group, and in 1 case from each of the SPK and PAK groups. The five-year kidney graft survival rates were 86.7% in KA, 95.2% in SPK, and 97.1% in PAK. There was a single patient loss in both KA and SPK. The kidney survival percentages were higher in SPK and PAK groups compared to the KA group. Therefore, SPK should be the primary preference in these patients; however, for the cases that have a living donor, pancreas transplantation should be considered after kidney transplantation, or the patients can be followed-up on with close blood sugar control.Key words: Kidney, Pancreas, Transplantation, Kidney survival, Patient survivalThe discovery of insulin in 1921 enabled the transition from diabetic ketoacidosis and diabetic coma to an increasing number of patients with prolonged life expectancies in the clinical course of diabetes mellitus (DM). However, with prolonged lifetime, increases in the neurological, ocular, and renal complications of DM have become evident. With a 40% rate, DM is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the United States.¹ In patients with type I DM-related kidney failure, kidney transplant is highly more preferable in terms of the negative effects of long-term dialysis on the patient survival and quality of life compared with the benefits of kidney transplants.² In patients who develop type I DM-related kidney failure, kidney-alone transplantation (KA) from a living donor or a cadaver, simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK), or pancreas-after-kidney transplantation (PAK) are among the transplantation alternatives. The 10-year life expectancy in patients receiving hemodialysis for ESRD, and in those undergoing living donor or a cadaveric renal transplantation, was reported to be 4.4, 32.9, and 59.3% in the United States, respectively.³ Similarly, while the average life expectancy for diabetes patients waiting for kidney transplantation was 8 years, the average life expectancy after kidney transplantation was determined to be 22 years.² When pancreas transplantation is added to kidney transplantation, prolonged kidney and patient survival rates can be attained along with other benefits, such as protection from the secondary effects of diabetes and an increase in patients'' quality of life. While the 4-year mortality rate in the selected dialysis patients on the waitlist for pancreas-kidney was 40%, it was 10% in patients who received SPK transplantation.⁴ The goal of this study is to compare the impact of the KA, SPK, and PAK transplantation methods on kidney graft and patient survival rates in patients with ESRD associated with type I diabetes.     

Patient and Graft Survival After Dual Kidney Transplantation With Marginal Donors in Comparison to Matched Control Groups

BackgroundPostmortal organ donor rates remain low in Germany, whereas donor age has been increasing considerably in the last decades. As a consequence of low donation rates older and more marginal donor kidneys are accepted for transplantation. However, procured kidneys from very old a/o marginal donors may be considered as not suitable for transplantation as a single organ and subsequently be discarded. However, dual transplantation of both kidneys from such donors may provide an opportunity to nevertheless use these organs for renal transplantation, thereby providing the twofold nephron mass as a single kidney transplantation.MethodsWe compared in this retrospective analysis the outcome of 10 recipients of a dual kidney transplantation (DKT) with 40 matched recipients of a single kidney transplantation (SKT). Recipients were matched for donor and recipient age (ie, a maximum age difference of ±10 years in a ratio of 1:4 for DKT vs SKT recipients). In addition, a second SKT control group of 10 SKT recipients being transplanted immediately before each DKT recipient with a kidney from a donor aged ≥65 years was used for comparison. All renal transplant recipients were observed for up to 3 years or until July 31, 2020.ResultsMean donor and recipient age was 77.2 ± 4.6/75.1 ± 6.6/82.1 ± 7.9 and 66.4 ± 5.8/66.1 ± 6.0/64.8 ± 8.4 for SKT group 1/SKT group 2/DKT, respectively. Procurement serum creatinine concentrations were significantly higher in the DKT group in comparison to the SKT control group 1 (P = .019) as was the rate of transplant artery atherosclerosis (P = .021). Furthermore, Kidney Donor Profile Index, and Kidney Donor Risk Index were significantly higher (P = .0138/P = .064, and P < .001/P = .038) in the DKT group than in SKT group 1 and 2. Rates of acute rejection and delayed graft function were not significantly different between groups, though biopsy-proven acute rejection was numerically higher in the SKT groups. Patient survival and overall and death-censored graft survival rates were also not significantly different between groups, although they tended to be higher after DKT.ConclusionsDKT provides an opportunity to successfully use postmortal kidneys even from donors aged >80 years and a Kidney Donor Profile Index ≥95% for renal transplantation. DKT may thereby increase the available pool of donors to better serve patients with end-stage renal disease on the waiting list.     

Risk Factors of the Development of Diabetes Mellitus After Kidney Transplantation

BackgroundThe occurrence of diabetes mellitus is common after kidney transplantation (posttransplant diabetes mellitus [PTDM]) and enhances the cardiovascular risk and risk for kidney graft loss. The incidence of PTDM is about 5% to 40%. This study aimed to examine the potential risk factors that determine the occurrence of PTDM.MethodsThis study retrospectively included 298 patients from transplantation unit of Evangelismos who underwent kidney transplantation during a 10-year period (January 1, 2009, to January 1, 2019). Kidney transplant recipients with diabetes mellitus prior to transplantation or those with follow-up of <6 months were rejected from the study. In total, the study included 274 recipients with a mean age of 50 ± 18 years. The mean time of monitoring was 63 ± 18 months. The PTDM diagnosis was based on the 2018 criteria of the American Diabetes Association.ResultsOf 274 kidney transplant recipients, PTDM developed in 38 (13.8%) patients over a period of 11 ± 9 months after transplantation. Given that immunosuppressive therapy was identical in most patients, statistical analysis did not correlate the incidence of diabetes with treatment. However, there was a correlation for the occurrence of PTDM between the presence of hypomagnesemia and increased uric acid levels. Finally, there was a negative correlation between the age of the recipient and the time of PTDM onset.ConclusionHypomagnesemia and hyperuricemia increased the risk of PTDM in these patients. Given the association between hypomagnesemia and the development of diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation, prospective studies are needed to identify the causes of PTDM and to develop prevention strategies.     

Patient and Graft Survival Implications of Simultaneous Pancreas Kidney Transplantation From Old Donors

We investigated graft and patient survival implications of simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK) transplant from old donors. Data describing patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus listed for an SPK transplant from 1994 to 2005 were drawn from Organ Procurement and Transplant Network registries. Allograft survival, patient survival and long-term survival expectations among SPK recipients from young (age <45 years) and old (age >/=45 years) donors were modeled by multivariate regression. We also examined predictors of reduced early access to young donor transplants. Of 16 496 eligible SPK candidates, 8850 patients (53.6%) received an SPK transplant and 776 (8.8%) of these transplants were from old donors. Reasonable 5-year, death-censored kidney (77.8 %) and pancreas (71.3%) survivals were achieved with old donors. SPK transplantation from both young and old donors predicted lower mortality compared to continued waiting. An additional expected wait of 1.5 years for a young donor equalized long-term survival expectations to that achieved with use of old donors. Early allocation of young donor transplants declined in the more recent era and varied by region, candidate age, blood type and sensitization. We conclude that old SPK donors should be considered for patients with decreased access to young donor transplants. Prospective evaluation of this practice is needed.     

Posttransplant Diabetes Mellitus After Pancreas Transplantation

Some patients do not achieve normoglycemia after an otherwise successful pancreas transplant. The aim of this study was to define the incidence and risk factors for the development of persistent diabetes mellitus after pancreas transplantation. We studied the outcomes of 144 pancreas transplants performed at our institution between January 2001 and December 2005. Diabetes mellitus was defined as the persistent need for pharmacologic treatment of diabetes mellitus despite evidence of allograft function. Data are expressed as median (25–75% inter-quartile range). Median follow-up was 39 months (IQR 26–55 months). During the follow-up period, 28 patients (19%) developed diabetes mellitus with a functioning allograft. Factors predicting hyperglycemia included: pretransplant insulin dose, BMI and acute rejection episodes (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0002 and p < 0.02, respectively). The median pretransplant hemoglobin A1c for patients developing diabetes was 8.3% (IQR 7.0–9.4%) compared to 6.2% (IQR 5.8–7.4%) at 2 years after transplant (p = 0.0069). In conclusion, persistent diabetes mellitus can occur despite the presence of a functioning pancreas allograft and is due to increased pretransplant BMI, high pretransplant insulin requirements and episodes of acute rejection.     

Clinical Consequences of Diabetes Mellitus in Patients After Kidney Transplantation: A Paired Kidney Analysis

Background

Diabetes mellitus (DM) has been acknowledged as the most common disorder leading to end-stage renal failure in adults. Diabetic patients show higher survival rates after kidney transplantation (KTx) compared with dialysis therapy. The aim of the study was to evaluate follow-up after KTx in patients with DM as a reason of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), or with long-lasting diabetes before transplantation, compared with patients without DM.

Influence of Dialysis Modality on Complications and Patient and Graft Survival After Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation

Introduction

We investigated whether hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis prior to pancreas-kidney transplantation was a risk factor for the development of surgical complications, recipient mortality, or graft loss.

Patients and methods

From March 1995 to December 2006, 90 patients with type 1 diabetes underwent pancreas transplantation. Dialysis before transplantation was provides to 81 patients. We compared outcomes of recipients classified as two groups: (A) hemodialysis (n = 49, 60.5%) versus (B) peritoneal dialysis (n = 32, 39.5%) groups.

Results

Donor and recipient characteristics were similar in both groups. Enteric drainage was more frequently used in the hemodialysis group and bladder drainage in the peritoneal dialysis group (P < .05). The rate of intra-abdominal infections was similar in both groups: 10 patients (20.4%) in the hemodialysis group and 9 patients (28.1%) in the peritoneal dialysis group (P = NS). The incidence of enteric or bladder leakage was slightly higher in the peritoneal dialysis group (5 cases, 15.6% vs 4 cases, 8.2% in the hemodialysis group; P = NS). The rate of reoperations was also slightly higher in the peritoneal dialysis group B (15 cases, 46.9% vs 14 cases, 28.6% in the hemodialysis group; P = .07). Pancreas transplantectomy was significantly greater in the peritoneal dialysis (9 cases; 28.1%) than the hemodialysis group (5 cases; 10.2%; P < .05). The actuarial 3-year patient survival was 95.9% in the hemodialysis group and 93.4% in the peritoneal dialysis group (P = NS); actuarial 3-year pancreas graft survival was 79.3% in the hemodialysis group and 68.3% in the peritoneal dialysis group (P = NS).

Conclusions

We noted an insignificantly greater rate of reoperations but significantly higher incidence of pancreas transplantectomy in the peritoneal dialysis group; however, patient and pancreas graft survivals were similar in both study groups.     

Long-term Allograft Survival After Kidney Transplantation

BackgroundTechnical and medical advances over the past few years have produced an important increase in the functionality of renal allografts. The aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with allograft survival 15 years after transplantation in our series.MethodsA retrospective study of kidney transplantations was carried out at Reina Sofia Hospital in Cordoba from February 1979 to December 1997, with follow-up through June 2012. A subanalysis of the series was undertaken, and Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards model regression used to achieve the main objective of the study.ResultsA total of 487 renal allografts with a mean follow-up of 114 months were studied, of which 37% (n = 180) survived for >15 years. Of the 180 patients, the main causes of graft failure were chronic allograft nephropathy in 29 (66%) and patient death in 13 (29.5%). Multivariate analysis identified the number of HLA mismatches (hazard ratio [HR] 1.25, 95% CI 1.01–1.56), panel reactive antibodies (HR 2.61, 95% CI 1.28–5.26), and delayed graft function (HR 11.25, 95% CI 1.33–95.28) as being significantly associated with graft loss after 15 years.ConclusionsThe high immunologic risk of the patients was independently associated with graft loss. Delayed graft function was the most important factor in the speed of graft failure beyond 15 years.     

Kidney Transplantation Significantly Improves Patient and Graft Survival Irrespective of BMI: A Cohort Study

Obesity and end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) are on the increase worldwide. Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for ESRD. However, obesity is considered a contraindication for transplantation. We investigated the effect of BMI on mortality in transplanted and patients remaining on the waiting list in the United Kingdom. We analyzed the UK Renal Registry (RR) and the National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) Organ Donation and Transplantation data for patients listed from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2010, with follow‐up until December 31, 2011. Seventeen thousand six hundred eighty‐one patients were listed during the study period, with BMI recorded for 13 526 (77%). One‐ and five‐year patient survival was significantly better in all BMI bands (<18.5, 18.5–<25, 25–<30, 30–<35, 35–<40, and 40+kg/m²) in the transplant group when compared to those who remained on the waiting list (p < 0.0001). The analyses were repeated excluding live donor transplants and the results were essentially the same. On analyses of patient survival with BMI as a continuous variable or using 5 kg weight bands, there was no cut‐off observed in the higher BMI patients where there would be no benefit to transplantation. For transplanted patients (N = 8088), there was no difference in patient or graft survival between the defined BMI bands. Thus, irrespective of BMI, patient survival is improved if transplanted.     

Anemia and Erythrocytosis After Kidney Transplantation: A 5-Year Graft Function and Survival Analysis

Introduction

Both anemia and erythrocytosis frequently occur after kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of both anemia and erythrocytosis on kidney graft function and long-term patient outcomes following kidney transplantation.

Patients and Methods

Three hundred eight-five consecutive patients with at least 12 months of follow-up after successful kidney transplantation were enrolled into this study. Of the total, 88.3% of patients completed a 5-year follow-up. Anemia occurred in 30.4% of patients (with 17.7% showing a hemoglobin concentration (Hb) <11.0 g/dL), whereas erythrocytosis was observed in 19.0% of patients, including 9.6% with hematocrit (HTC) >55%. We also analyzed graft function every 6 months after transplantation for the impact of anemia or erythrocytosis on the 5-year risk of patient death or graft loss.

Results

In 57.3% of anemia patients the Hb did not reach the normal range during the observation time. The mean eGFR-Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) at 12 months after transplantation was significantly lower among patients with anemia: 43.9 mL/min/1.73 m² (39.5-48.4) vs 55.3 mL/min/1.73 m² (53.0-57.6; P < .001). Better 12-month graft function was observed among patients with erythrocytosis, namely, 57.7 mL/min/1.73 m² (53.5-62.0). Anemia but not erythrocytosis was associated with an increased risk of graft loss (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.11 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.02-8.37]; P < .001).

Conclusion

Anemia after transplantation was associated with worse kidney graft function and was a strong predictor of graft loss. Erythrocytosis occurs among patients with excellent allograft function; when properly treated it did not increase the risk of graft loss or death.