Risk Factors Affecting Graft and Patient Survivals After Transplantation From Deceased Donors in a Developing Country: A Single-Center Experience

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors affecting graft and patient survival after transplantation from deceased donors.

Fertility Outcome After Renal Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

BackgroundWomen suffering from kidney disease are more prone to fertility problems, due to uremia. Fortunately, their fertility rate increases dramatically after renal transplantation. This study analyzes the predictors/risk factors of successful pregnancy with live birth outcome while presenting an overview of the 7-year experience of a single center.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study includes 239 women of reproductive age (18–40 years) who underwent renal transplantation in a tertiary Turkish clinic between October 1, 2011, and August 24, 2017. The subjects were invited to take part in a survey questioning their obstetric characteristics and they were assessed in 2 groups: fertile and infertile. Multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted to determine the predictors of a successful pregnancy.ResultsThirty-five 35 patients wished to become pregnant: 12 got pregnant spontaneously, while 21 failed to become pregnant (spontaneously). The mean age of the patients at the survey was 34 ± 7. Regular menstrual cycles after renal transplantation, tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil maintenance protocol, and age at transplantation were found to be predictors of spontaneous pregnancy. The duration of peritoneal dialysis was significantly longer in the infertile group (48 vs 12 months).ConclusionEnd-stage renal disease's negative impacts, including menstrual abnormality and fertility problems, can be overcome by successful kidney transplantation with appropriate immunosuppression. Minimizing the duration of peritoneal dialysis, particularly in patients who desire future fertility, may be accepted as a logical management strategy.     

Long-Term Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation From Expanded-Criteria Deceased Donors: A Single-Center Experience

Background

Organ shortage has prompted the use of expanded-criteria donors (ECDs). Our objective was to compare long-term outcomes of kidney transplants from ECDs with those from concurrent standard-criteria donors (SCDs). In addition, we evaluated variables associated with graft survival in both groups.

Deceased Donor Organ Transplantation With Expanded Criteria Donors: A Single-Center Experience From India

Introduction

Deceased donor organ transplantation (DDOT) accounts for <4% of renal transplants in India. Many volunteers come forth for organ donation with increasing awareness; unfortunately, the majority are marginal donors, but their rejection would hamper the DDOT program. Judicious use of marginal organs is a challenge for developing countries.

Patients and Methods

We performed 29 renal transplants from 21 expanded criteria donors (ECD) out of 115 DDOT between January 2006 to April 2009—10 dual (DKT) and 19 single (SKT). Fourteen donors had hypertension, a cerebrovascular accident as the cause of death, 9 had both, and 4 had diabetes. Mean donor age was 70.3 ± 8.9 years. Decisions on the procedure were based upon frozen section biopsy in 13 of 21 donors. Mean DKT donor age was 76 ± 9.7 years versu 64 ± 5.7 years of SKT donors. The native kidney diseases were chronic glomerulonephritis (n = 14), diabetic nephropathy (n = 7), tubulointerstitial nephritis (n = 4) and polycystic kidney disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, lupus nephritis and patchy cortical necrosis, (n = 1 each). Mean recipient age of DKT versus SKT was 43.5 versus 42.3 years. All recipients received rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin, followed by steroid, mycophenolate mofetil/calcinueurin inhibitor.

Results

Over a mean follow-up of 341 days, the mean serum creatinine (SCr) of 25/29 patients was 1.60 mg/dL (range, 1.0-2.6). The mean SCr of SKT patients was 1.59 ± 0.63 mg/dL and of DKT, 1.62 ± 0.48 mg/dL. Ten patients had delayed graft function and 11 had biopsy proven acute tubular necrosis. Seven (24%) patients had rejection (grade 3 Banff update '05, type IA; 4, type 2A); 6 responded to antirejection; 1 graft was lost at 7 months due to chronic rejection. Three (10.3%) patients were lost, 1 each due to AMI, sepsis, and CMV disease.

Conclusion

In the circumstances of organ shortage, DDOT with expanded criteria donor is a feasible option.     

Kidney Graft Outcome and Quality (After Transplantation) From Uncontrolled Deceased Donors After Cardiac Arrest

The use of uncontrolled deceased donors after cardiac arrest (uDDCA) has been developed in France to compensate for organ shortage. The quality of these kidneys remains unclear. We analyzed kidney graft function and histology from 27 uDDCA and compared them with kidneys from 30 extended criteria donors (ECD) and from 24 simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK) donors as a control group of optimal deceased donors. Kidneys from ECD and SPK donors were preserved by static cold storage while kidneys from uDDCA were preserved by pulsatile perfusion. The uDDCA graft function at 3 years posttransplantation (estimated with MDRD and measured with inulin clearance) did not differ from that of the ECD group (eGFR 44.1 vs. 37.4 mL/min/1.73 m², p = 0.13; mGFR 44.6 vs. 36.1 mL/min/1.73 m², p = 0.07 in the uDDCA and ECD groups, respectively). The histological assessment of 3‐month and 1‐year protocol biopsies did not show differences for interstitial lesions between the uDDCA and ECD grafts (IF score at M3 was 30 vs. 28% and at M12 36 vs. 33%, p = NS). In conclusion, the results at 3 years with carefully selected and machine‐perfused uDDCA kidneys have been comparable to ECD kidneys and encourage continuation of this program and development of similar programs.     

Results of Kidney Transplantation From Donors After Cardiac Death

Confronting the organ donor shortage, many transplant centers around the world increasingly use donors after cardiac death (DCD). Over the past 20 years, follow-up studies in kidney recipients comparing DCD and donors after brain death (DBD) have shown comparable long-term graft function and survival. As a consequence, DCD programs should be continued and expanded, for these donors constitute a potential solution to the imbalance between the numbers of end-stage kidney disease patients on waiting lists versus available kidney grafts. DCD kidneys do not necessarily signify suboptimal grafts; they may merit to be allocated the same as DBD grafts.     

Outcome of Transplantation in Renal Allograft Recipients From Cadaveric Donors With Standard and Expanded Criteria: A Single-Center Experience

IntroductionThe increasing number of patients requiring kidney transplantation and the lack of available organs has led to the utilization of kidneys from expanded criteria donors (ECD).AimThe comparison of the clinical outcome of renal transplantation, performed in a single center, between allograft recipients from standard (SCD) and expanded criteria donors (ECD).Patients and MethodsData from 215 cadaveric renal transplantations performed during a 16 year period at the University Hospital of Patras were retrospectively studied. Donors' and recipients' characteristics (gender, age, history of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, cold ischemia time, post-transplant and long term graft function) were analyzed.ResultsGrafts from donors with expanded criteria (ECD, n = 53) were allocated to older recipients whereas grafts from donors with standard criteria (SCD, n = 162) were allocated to younger recipients. The mean cold ischemia time was 1,146 min and was similar between the two groups of patients. Patients' survival rates were similar between allograft recipients from SCD and ECD up to the 5^th post-transplant year of follow-up. Graft survival was significantly better in allograft recipients from SCD during a 5-year follow-up period. A significantly lower eGFR was noted in allograft recipients from ECD in comparison to those from SCD throughout the observation period. Cold ischemia time was positively correlated to the development of DGF, while patients with DGF had significantly worse graft function throughout the observation period.ConclusionPatient survival from ECD is comparable to that from SCD but graft survival is significantly lower. However, since renal function of recipients from ECD is adequate for long term period, grafts from ECD should be used in older patients.     

Kidney Transplantation From Cardiac Death Donors With Terminal Acute Renal Failure

Objectives

Kidney transplantation from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors with terminal acute renal failure (ARF) is not widely accepted due to concern about the organ quality. Here we report our initial clinical outcomes of kidney transplantation from DCD donors with ARF.

Materials and Methods

The results of 29 kidney transplants from ARF DCD donors were compared with those of 60 kidney transplants from non-ARF DCD donors performed at our center from August 2011 to March 2013.

Results

There was no difference in the incidence of delayed graft function and acute rejection between ARF and non-ARF kidneys (27.6% vs 16.7%, 10.3% vs 8.3%, respectively). Estimated glomerular filtration rate at 12 months was similar between ARF and non-ARF kidneys. With a mean follow-up of 18 months (range 7 to 26 months), actual patient and graft survival rates for ARF DCD recipients were 100% and 96.6%, respectively, which were similar to those of the control group of kidney transplants from non-ARF kidneys (98.3% and 95.0%).

Conclusions

Kidneys from DCD donors with terminal ARF have excellent short-term outcomes and may represent another potential method to safely expand the donor pool.     

Lung Transplantation With Grafts From Elderly Donors: A Single-Center Experience

Introduction

Use of extended criteria donors is one of the strategies to face the scarcity of donors for lung transplantation.

Methods

Between November 2002 and May 2009, we performed 52 LTs in 50 recipients, 10 of whom (group A) received lungs from donors aged 55 years or older (median, 58.5; range, 56-66 years) for comparison with 28 patients (group B) transplanted with lungs from donors younger than 55 years (median, 25.5; range, 15-54 years). We excluded 9 children and 3 recipients of combined liver plus lung transplantations from the study.

Results

Recipient age, gender, and indications for transplantation did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Neither were there significant differences in PaO2/FiO2 ratios before lung retrieval, or length of the ischemic time The first PaO2/FiO2 on arrival to the intensive care unit (ICU) and the median length of ICU stay were similar. All patients, except 2 who died in the operating theatre, were extubated between 3 and 216 hours after the transplantation. Hospital mortality was similar in both groups: 3 patients in group A and 2 in group B (P = .1). The median portions of the predicted 1-second forced expiratory volume (FEV1) at 6 months after transplantation did not differ in the 2 groups: 62.4% in group A versus 70% in group B (P = .85).

Conclusion

Lung grafts from donors older than 55 years can be effectively used for transplantation, thus increasing the total organ pool.     

Vascular Complications After Deceased and Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

Introduction

Vascular complications (VC) after liver transplantation (OLT) are one of the most feared problems that frequently result in graft and patient loss. Herein we have reported our experience with VC after either deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) or living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

Patients and Methods

Between April 2001 and September 2009, we performed 224 OLT: 155 DDLT and 69 LDLT. The overall male/female ratio was 136/88 and the adult/pediatric ratio was 208/16. We retrospectively identified and analyzed vascular complications in both groups.

Results

In the DDLT group, 11/155 recipients (7%) suffered vascular complications; hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT; n = 5; 3.2%), portal vein thrombosis occurred (n = 4; 2.6%); hepatic vein stenosis (n = 1; 0.6%), and severe postoperative bleeding due to a slipped splenic artery ligature (n = 1, 0.6%). In the DDLT group, 4/11 (36.4%) patients died as a direct result of the vascular complications. In the LDLT group, 9/69 recipients (13%) suffered vascular complications: HAT (n = 3; 4.3%), portal vein problems (n = 5; 7.2%), and hepatic vein stenosis (n = 1; 1.5%). Among LDLT, 3/9 (33.3%) patients died as a direct result of the vascular complications. In both groups vascular complications were associated with poorer patient and graft survival.

Conclusions

In our experience, the incidence of vascular complications was significantly higher among the LDLT group compared with the DDLT group. Vascular complications were associated with poorer graft and patient survival rates in both groups.     

Donor Hemodynamics as a Predictor of Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation From Donors After Cardiac Death

Donation after cardiac death is an important source of transplantable organs, but evidence suggests donor warm ischemia contributes to inferior outcomes. Attempts to predict recipient outcome using donor hemodynamic measurements have not yielded statistically significant results. We evaluated novel measures of donor hemodynamics as predictors of delayed graft function and graft failure in a cohort of 1050 kidneys from 566 donors. Hemodynamics were described using regression line slopes, areas under the curve, and time beyond thresholds for systolic blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and shock index (heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure). A logistic generalized estimation equation model showed that area under the curve for systolic blood pressure was predictive of delayed graft function (above median: odds ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06–1.90). Multivariable Cox regression demonstrated that slope of oxygen saturation during the first 10 minutes after extubation was associated with graft failure (below median: hazard ratio 1.30, 95% CI 1.03–1.64), with 5‐year graft survival of 70.0% (95%CI 64.5%–74.8%) for donors above the median versus 61.4% (95%CI 55.5%–66.7%) for those below the median. Among older donors, increased shock index slope was associated with increased hazard of graft failure. Validation of these findings is necessary to determine the utility of characterizing donor warm ischemia to predict recipient outcome.     

Kidney Transplantation in Old Recipients From Old Donors: A Single-Center Experience

Purpose

The program Old for Old or European Senior Program (ESP), allocates donors aged ≥65 years to recipients of ≥65, within a narrow geographic area in order to minimize cold ischemia time, decrease the waiting time for elderly patients listed for kidney transplantation and expand the transplant resource in this group. The ESP is not officially applied in Greece. In our center, the Old for Old criteria have been used since 2003 for elderly patients who are candidates for kidney transplantation.

In Vitro Fertilization After Renal Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

IntroductionAlthough kidney transplantation often increases the chances of fertility, the rate of infertile patients is still high. In vitro fertilization promises successful results for infertile renal transplantation patients. The purpose of this study was to analyze the experience of a single center.MethodsPatients were invited to complete a survey for their obstetric history. Documentation review included demographic and clinical characteristics of patients, like procedure records, follow-up complications, immunosuppression maintenance protocols, and pregnancy outcomes.ResultsThirteen patients were reached to complete the survey. The mean age of patients was 33 ± 4 years at in vitro fertilization (IVF). The median duration of infertility was 2 years. Twenty-four IVF sessions were applied to these 13 women with renal transplantation. The procedure failed in 13 of these sessions; and 8 women achieved 11 clinical pregnancies. There were 3 miscarriages and 2 stillbirths. Six women had live births with no neonatal deaths. One patient had a graft rejection after the IVF procedure. Serum creatinine level increased more than 30% in 3 patients after the IVF procedure, while 9 patients had a minimal or no change.DiscussionIn our study, we evaluated the records of 13 patients with renal transplantation who had IVF procedures. Fortunately, more than half of these patients had live births with no neonatal deaths. In our opinion, our findings show that IVF procedures can be accepted as a promising method in patients with renal transplantation and need a therapy for fertility. Moreover, a 25% live-birth rate per procedure is also a satisfactory result.     

Improved Outcomes of Renal Transplantation from Cardiac Death Donors: A 30-Year Single Center Experience

Outcomes of renal transplantation from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors over 30 years were analyzed. Between 1975 and 2004, 256 renal transplantations from DCD donors were performed. The recipients were divided into four groups according to a time period as follows: 1975-1979 (Group 1; n = 18), 1980-1989 (Group 2; n = 81), 1990-1999 (Group 3; n = 84) and 2000-2004 (Group 4; n = 73). Of the 256 transplanted kidneys from DCD donors, 38 (15%) functioned immediately after transplantation. The incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) was 72%. Warm ischemic time and total ischemic time were 7.4 +/- 9.4 min and 11.9 +/- 5.6 h, respectively. The overall graft survival rates at 1, 5 and 10 years were 80%, 72% and 53%, respectively. Graft survival rates in each group have continually improved over time (5-year graft survival; 23% vs. 64% vs. 74% vs. 91%, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in graft survival rates between the groups of patients who survived with a functioning graft for more than 1 year. A multivariate Cox regression analysis showed acute rejection and donor age to be independently associated with graft outcome. DCD donors are a valuable source of kidneys for transplantation with promising long-term outcomes.     

Kidney Transplantation From Donors After Cardiac Death: An Initial Report of 71 Cases From China

Shortage of deceased donors is a severe problem in recent years in China especially in a culture in which brain death criteria is not widely accepted. Donation after cardiac death (DCD) has been reported to expand the donor pool despite higher rates of primary nonfunction (PNF) and delayed graft function (DGF) after transplantation. We collected 71 DCD kidney transplants performed at our hospital between February, 2007 and June, 2012 with aims to demonstrate the feasibility of DCD donation in China. All patients were followed up, and postoperative complications and graft loss were recorded. The PNF rate was 2.8%, and DGF rate was 28.2%. The 1‐ and 3‐year graft survival was 95.7% and 92.4%. In conclusion, graft survival of DCD kidney transplantation in China is excellent despite of higher rates of PNF and DGF after transplantation.     

Donation After Cardiac Death: The University of Wisconsin Experience with Renal Transplantation

Owing to the shortage of organ donors, there is renewed interest in donation after cardiac death (DCD), formerly referred to as nonheart-beating donation. From January 1984 until August 2000, 382 renal transplants were performed from DCD donors. These were compared with 1089 renal transplants performed from donation after brain death (DBD) donors. The mean warm ischemic time in DCD donors was 16.5 min. There was no statistical difference in cold ischemic time, rate of primary nonfunction, or graft loss in the first 30 days after transplantation. The rate of delayed graft function (DGF) was higher for DCD donors (27.5% vs. 21.3%; p = 0.016) and discharge creatinine was higher in DCD donors (1.92 mg/dL vs. 1.71 mg/dL; p = 0.001). There was no statistical difference in the 5-, 10-, or 15-year allograft survival when DCD donors were compared with DBD donors (64.8%, 44.8%, 27.8% vs. 71.3%, 48.3%, 33.8%; p = 0.054). Likewise, no statistical difference in the rate of technical complications was seen. Our long-term data indicate that the results of renal transplantation from DCD donors are equivalent to long-term allograft survival from DBD donors despite an increase in the rate of DGF. Organ procurement organizations, transplant centers, and hospitals should work to expand the implementation of DCD policies.     

Outcome of Renal Transplantation in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Single-Center Experience

BackgroundAn increasing proportion of kidney recipients have diabetes mellitus (DM). Some concerns have been raised about the kidney transplantation results in diabetic patients. Therefore, we assessed the effect of DM on morbidity and mortality of diabetic patients with renal transplantation.MethodsWe retrospectively studied adult patients with and without DM who underwent living donor transplantation between 2007 and 2016. Information concerning demographic and clinical data were retrospectively analyzed by reviewing the patient files.ResultsOf the 1536 transplant recipients, 126 (8%) had diabetes mellitus (mean age 49.4 ± 11.8) and 525 patients were evaluated in the non-diabetic control group (mean age 36.2 ± 15.9). The diabetic and non-diabetic patient groups had a mean follow-up after kidney transplantation 42.5 months (0.27-101.7 months) and 58.8 ± 10.6 months, respectively. In the diabetic patient group, only 3 patients had lost graft and 13 patients were exitus. Three patients had lost graft and 5 patients were exitus in non-diabetic patient group. Cardiac death (54.5%) was the most common cause of mortality in diabetic group. The 6-year patient and graft survival rates are 84.9% and 95.3%; 97.5% and 97.2% in the diabetic and non-diabetic patient groups, respectively.ConclusionsBoth infection and cardiovascular diseases increase morbidity and mortality in renal transplant patients with diabetes mellitus. The mortality risk of diabetic patients after renal transplantation is higher than the non-diabetic kidney recipients. Therefore, diabetic patients need meticulous cardiac evaluation before renal transplantation and a close follow-up, in terms of infection, after transplantation.