Continuous administration of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist during the luteal phase in IVF

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that ceasing the administration of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist causes a profound suppression of circulating serum gonadotrophins. A comparative prospective and randomized study was conducted to investigate the effect of continuous administration of GnRH agonist during the luteal phase in an ovarian stimulation programme for IVF. METHODS: GnRH agonist was administered intranasally from the midluteal phase of the previous cycle, and pure FSH administration started on cycle day 7. In the continuous-long protocol (cL) group (n = 161 ), GnRH agonist administration was continued until 14 days after oocyte retrieval. In the long protocol (L) group (n = 158 ), GnRH agonist was administered until the day before human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. RESULTS: The implantation rate and live birth rate per unit of transferred embryos were significantly higher in the cL group than the L group (P < 0.05 ). Serum LH and FSH concentrations on the day of, and 1 day after, HCG administration were significantly lower in the L group than the cL group (P < 0.01 ). CONCLUSIONS: Continuation of GnRH agonist administration during the luteal phase might facilitate implantation, and prevent the profound suppression of serum gonadotrophins.     

Initiation of GnRH antagonist on Day 1 of stimulation as compared to the long agonist protocol in PCOS patients. A randomized controlled trial: effect on hormonal levels and follicular development

BACKGROUND The optimal time for GnRH antagonist initiation is still debatable. The purpose of the current randomized controlled trial is to provide endocrine and follicular data during ovarian stimulation for IVF in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) treated either with a long GnRH agonist scheme or a fixed day-1 GnRH antagonist protocol. METHODS Randomized patients in both groups (antagonist: n = 26; long agonist: n = 52) received oral contraceptive pill treatment for three weeks and a starting dose of 150 IU of follitropin beta. The primary outcome was E(2) level on Day 5 of stimulation, while secondary outcomes were follicular development, LH during ovarian stimulation and progesterone levels. RESULTS Significantly more follicles on days 5, 7 and 8 of stimulation, significantly higher estradiol (E(2)) levels on days 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 and significantly higher progesterone levels on days 1, 5 and 8 of stimulation were observed in the antagonist when compared with the agonist group. E(2) was approximately twice as high in the antagonist when compared with the agonist group on day 5 of stimulation (432 versus 204 pg ml(-1), P lt; 0.001). These differences were accompanied by significantly lower LH levels on days 3 and 5 and significantly higher LH levels on days 1, 7 and 8 of stimulation in the antagonist when compared with the agonist group. CONCLUSIONS In PCOS patients undergoing IVF, initiation of GnRH antagonist concomitantly with recombinant FSH is associated with an earlier follicular growth and a different hormonal environment during the follicular phase when compared with the long agonist protocol.     

Is there a difference in the function of granulosa-luteal cells in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization either with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist or gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist?

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) regulates gonadotrophin release. It has been shown that GnRH may have a direct effect on the ovary, as the addition of GnRH to granulosa cell cultures inhibits the production of progesterone and oestradiol. Specific GnRH receptors have been found to be present in rat and human granulosa cells. Desensitization of the pituitary by GnRH agonist has become common in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment, usually by a long protocol of 2-3 weeks. With the introduction of GnRH antagonists, which produce an immediate blockage of the GnRH receptors, a much shorter exposure is needed of 3-6 days. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a GnRH agonist (buserelin) and a GnRH antagonist (cetrorelix) on the function of granulosa cells cultured in vitro from IVF patients. Women were treated by IVF randomized either to have buserelin nasal spray from the luteal phase in the previous cycle or cetrorelix from day 6 of the cycle. Both groups had ovarian stimulation with human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) 150 IU daily, i.e. HCG was administered when the follicles were larger than 17 mm, and aspirated 36 h later. Granulosa cells, separated and washed from large follicles containing ova, were pooled. After 48 h of pre-incubation, the granulosa cells were cultured for 4 days in medium with either added testosterone or cAMP with or without HCG, with change of medium after 2 days. The progesterone and oestradiol concentrations in the culture medium were measured by immunological assay, and cellular protein was measured by microprotein assay. The results showed that granulosa cells from women treated with GnRH antagonist (cetrorelix) responded earlier to the in-vitro hormone stimulation in terms of progesterone accumulation than women treated with the GnRH agonist (buserelin). This may have been due to difference in time of exposure to the analogue. The results may indicate that the luteal function is less impaired in GnRH antagonist treatment than in GnRH agonist treatment.     

Women with poor response to IVF have lowered circulating gonadotrophin surge-attenuating factor (GnSAF) bioactivity during spontaneous and stimulated cycles

BACKGROUND: Up to 13% of IVF cancellations are due to poor responses during down-regulated cycles. Because premature luteinization occurs more frequently in older or "poor responder" patients, defective production of gonadotrophin surge-attenuating factor (GnSAF) may be involved. METHODS: Nine women with normal previous IVF response (NORM) and 9 with previous poor IVF response (POOR) were monitored in a spontaneous cycle (blood samples: days 2, 7, 11, 15 and 20) and then stimulated with recombinant human FSH (rFSH) under GnRH agonist (blood samples: treatment days GnRH agonist + 2, GnRH agonist + 7, day of HCG administration and days HCG + 1 and HCG + 8). LH, FSH, estradiol, progesterone and inhibin-A and -B were assayed in individual samples while GnSAF bioactivity was determined in samples pooled according to day, cycle and IVF response. RESULTS: During spontaneous cycles LH, steroids and inhibins were similar between NORM and POOR women, FSH was elevated in POOR women (4.9 +/- 0.3 versus 6.7 +/- 0.6 mIU/l, P < 0.01) and GnSAF bioactivity was detectable on days 2, 7 and 11 in NORM women only. During IVF cycles inhibin-A and -B rose more markedly in NORM than POOR women. Similarly GnSAF production peaked on day GnRH agonist + 7 in NORM women, but on the day of HCG administration in POOR women. CONCLUSIONS: Defects in ovarian responsiveness to FSH include reduced GnSAF production. This suggests that GnSAF should be investigated as a marker of ovarian reserve once an immunoassay becomes available.     

Use of cetrorelix in combination with clomiphene citrate and gonadotrophins: a suitable approach to 'friendly IVF'?

BACKGROUND: With the recently introduced GnRH antagonists, soft stimulation protocols on the basis of clomiphene pretreatment should be possible as the pituitary remains fully sensitive at the beginning of the cycle. METHODS: A prospective trial was carried out on 107 patients undergoing IVF treatment using the multiple dose GnRH antagonist protocol (cetrorelix), clomiphene citrate, and either HMG (n = 54) or recombinant FSH (rFSH) (n = 53). Different stimulation protocols were used to find the most appropriate one for clinical application. RESULTS: Both treatment groups, HMG and rFSH, yielded comparable results concerning gonadotrophin dose, stimulation days and pregnancy rate. A mean number of 6.34 +/- 4.4 metaphase II oocytes was retrieved and a mean number of 2.45 +/- 0.65 embryos was transferred. However, the overall rate of premature LH surges was 21.5% (defined as measurement of LH >10 IU/l and progesterone >1 ng/ml) which is unacceptable for clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the daily cetrorelix dose from 0.25 to 0.5 mg might decrease the number of premature LH surges. Soft stimulation protocols with clomiphene should be used cautiously.     

Ovarian stimulation with HMG: results of a prospective randomized phase III European study comparing the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)-antagonist cetrorelix and the LHRH-agonist buserelin. European Cetrorelix Study Group

In this prospective and randomized study, 188 patients received the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) antagonist cetrorelix, and 85 patients the LHRH agonist buserelin to prevent endogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) surges during ovarian stimulation in in-vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. Ultimately, 181 patients (96.3%) in the cetrorelix group, and 77 (90.6%) in the buserelin group, reached the day of the human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) injection. The mean number of human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) ampoules administered and the mean number of stimulation days with HMG were significantly less in the cetrorelix group than in the buserelin group (P < 0.01). A rise in LH and progesterone concentrations was observed in three of the 188 patients (1.6%) who received cetrorelix. On the day of the HCG administration, more follicles of a small diameter (11-14 mm) were observed in the buserelin group than in the cetrorelix group (P = 0. 02) and the mean serum oestradiol concentration was significantly higher in patients who received buserelin than in those who received cetrorelix (P < 0.01). Similar results were observed in fertilization, cleavage and pregnancy rates in the two groups. In conclusion, the use of the LHRH antagonists might be considered more advantageous because of the short-term application needed to inhibit gonadotrophin secretion, so allowing a reduction in the treatment time in a clinically significant manner.     

Pituitary gonadotrophin secretory capacity during the luteal phase in superovulation using GnRH-agonists and HMG in a desensitization or flare-up protocol.

Pituitary gonadotrophin reserve and basal gonadotrophin secretion were tested during the luteal phase in women superovulated with buserelin/human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) in a desensitization (n = 17) or flare-up protocol (n = 7). In the desensitization protocol the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) stimulated serum LH and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations remained impaired at least until day 14 after arrest of the agonist. In the flare-up protocol basal and stimulated LH secretion was still abnormal on days 14 and 15 after human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) injection. Normal basal serum FSH concentrations were measured at the end of the luteal phase in the flare-up protocol, but the response of FSH to LHRH injection was still subnormal. We conclude that gonadotrophin function remained impaired until the end of the luteal phase after desensitization and flare-up GnRH-agonist and HMG stimulation protocols. Corpus luteum stimulation with exogenous HCG or substitution therapy using natural progesterone are required to prevent the possible negative effects resulting from pituitary dysfunction after GnRH-agonist treatment.     

Embryo implantation and GnRH antagonists: GnRH antagonists do not activate the GnRH receptor

Recent suggestions that gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists activate the GnRH receptor are discussed. Most of the studies cited in support of this suggestion are in-vitro studies, testing supra-pharmacological doses of GnRH analogues in cancer cell lines, whereas GnRH antagonists, e.g. ganirelix or cetrorelix, do not affect the steroidogenesis of human granulosa cells in vitro. In patients treated with GnRH antagonists prior to IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), oocyte maturity and fertilization rates are equal to those achieved following a long protocol of GnRH agonists. Although there is a tendency towards a lower pregnancy rate (not statistically significant) in the initial trials using GnRH antagonist with either recombinant FSH or human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) for ovarian stimulation, this new treatment option of GnRH antagonists facilitates short and simple treatment and improves the convenience and safety for the patient. As with GnRH agonists in the past, the clinical outcome of GnRH antagonist treatment will improve with time as more clinical experience is gained (learning curve) and the treatment protocol is optimized. Moreover, a GnRH agonist instead of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) may be used for triggering ovulation and will decrease the cancellation rate and minimize the risk for developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).     

Ovarian stimulation by clomiphene citrate and hMG in combination with cetrorelix acetate for ICSI cycles

BACKGROUND: The introduction of GnRH antagonists such as cetrorelix acetate has made possible the simplification of ovarian stimulation. However, the most effective protocol for their administration has not yet been clearly defined. METHODS: Forty women with male-factor infertility undergoing 40 ICSI cycles were included in the study. Clomiphene citrate at 100 mg a day was given from cycle day 3 through day 7. hMG at 150 IU was given on cycle days 4, 6 and 8, and was adjusted from day 9 according to the follicular and hormone responses. Cetrorelix acetate at 2.5 mg was administered when the leading follicle reached 14 mm. The remaining 0.5 mg was divided into two 0.25 mg injections for possible later use. Serum FSH, LH, estradiol and progesterone levels were measured daily from the day of cetrorelix acetate injection until hCG was given. RESULTS: Serum LH level was suppressed effectively for 4 days. Four patients (10%) needed one or two additional injections of 0.25 mg cetrorelix acetate. No premature LH surge was detected in any of the women treated. Sixteen women became pregnant (40%), of which 14 pregnancies (35%) were ongoing at the time of writing. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that this new protocol is feasible for couples with male-factor infertility undergoing ICSI.     

Beneficial effect of luteal-phase GnRH agonist administration on embryo implantation after ICSI in both GnRH agonist- and antagonist-treated ovarian stimulation cycles

BACKGROUND: GnRH agonist was recently suggested as a novel luteal-phase support that may act at different levels, including the pituitary gonadotrophs, the endometrium and the embryo itself. This prospective randomized study evaluates the effect of GnRH agonist administered in the luteal phase on ICSI outcomes in both GnRH agonist- and GnRH antagonist-treated ovarian stimulation protocols. METHODS: Six hundred women about to undergo ovarian stimulation for ICSI (300 using a long GnRH agonist protocol and 300 using a GnRH antagonist protocol) were enrolled in this study. Patients treated with each of these two protocols were randomly assigned to receive a single injection of GnRH agonist or placebo 6 days after ICSI. Implantation and live birth rates were the primary outcomes. RESULTS: Administration of 0.1 mg of GnRH agonist triptorelin on day 6 after ICSI led to a significant improvement of implantation and live birth rates after ICSI as compared with placebo. In GnRH antagonist-treated ovarian stimulation cycles, luteal-phase GnRH agonist also increased ongoing pregnancy rate. Moreover, luteal-phase GnRH agonist administration increased luteal-phase serum HCG, estradiol and progesterone concentrations in both ovarian stimulation regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Luteal-phase GnRH agonist administration enhances ICSI clinical outcomes after GnRH agonist- and GnRH antagonist-treated ovarian stimulation cycles, possibly by a combination of effects on the embryo and the corpus luteum.     

Comparison of GnRH agonists and antagonists in assisted reproduction cycles of patients at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND: During IVF or ICSI cycles, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a major problem. The aim of this prospective, multicentre, comparative study (using historical controls) was to assess the efficacy of a GnRH antagonist protocol in preventing OHSS in selected patients who had experienced OHSS or had been at risk of OHSS in their previous IVF/ICSI attempt. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients underwent a new cycle where the same gonadotrophin protocol was used [same dose of recombinant FSH (rFSH)] but a different protocol was used for pituitary desensitization: cetrorelix 0.25 mg multiple-dose antagonist instead of GnRH agonist long protocol. Cetrorelix 0.25 mg was administered daily, starting when the leading follicle reached a diameter of 14 mm. In other words, rFSH was administered in the new cycle according to the dosage and the step-up or step-down modalities used during the previous cycle, independently of ultrasound findings and serum estradiol (E(2)) levels. Eighty-seven patients entered the study. Out of the 87 cycles involving GnRH agonists, 49 (56.3%) were cancelled and out of the 87 involving GnRH antagonists 28 (32.2%) were cancelled [McNemar's test; 95% confidence interval (CI) -35.8% to -11.2%; P < 0.001]. After GnRH agonist cycles, we recorded 24 cases of OHSS (18 moderate and six severe; 27.6%), whereas after the GnRH antagonist cycles there were 10 cases of OHSS (nine moderate and one severe; 11.5%) (95% CI-26.4% to -5.7%; P = 0.006). There was a statistically significant reduction in the total number of follicles with a diameter >10 mm (Wilcoxon's test; Z = 6.1; P < 0.001) and of E(2) levels on the day of HCG administration (2538 versus 4322.4 pg/ml; P < 0.001) in the GnRH antagonist cycles versus GnRH agonist cycles. Twenty-nine patients had an embryo transfer in the first cycle (76.3% of oocyte retrievals) and 57 in the cycle using GnRH antagonist (96.6%). This 20.3% difference was also significant (Z-test; 95% CI 6.8-36.0%; P = 0.003). After the antagonist cycles, 18 pregnancies (20.7 per initiated cycle; 31.6% per embryo transfer) were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study presents some limitations owing to the use of historical controls, our data show a favourable effect of GnRH antagonists in reducing the incidence of OHSS and the number of assisted fertilization cycles cancelled because of the risk of OHSS in high responder patients. As a consequence, GnRH antagonist plus gonadotrophin administration could also increase the percentage of oocyte retrievals and embryo transfers in this high risk group of patients.     

An update of luteal phase support in stimulated IVF cycles

Stimulated IVF cycles are associated with luteal phase defect. In order to overcome this, different doses, durations and types of luteal phase support (LPS) have been evaluated. There is still no agreement regarding the optimal supplementation scheme. The aim of this paper is to assess the past and the current clinical practices of luteal supplementation in IVF. The databases of Medline and PubMed were searched to identify relevant publications. LPS with human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) [n=262, odds ratio (OR) 2.72 (95%), confidence interval (CI) 1.56-4.90, P<0.05] or progesterone (n=260, OR 1.57 CI 1.13, 2.17, P<0.05) results in an increased pregnancy rate compared with placebo, however, hCG is associated with increased risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Natural micronized progesterone is not efficient if taken orally. The data on oral dydrogesterone are still conflicting. Vaginal and intra muscular progesterone have comparable outcomes. The addition of estradiol (E2) seems to be beneficial in long GnRH agonist protocol (implantation rate 39.6% with E2 compared with no E2; P<0.05) but not in the short GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist protocol. Despite the early promising results, it is too early to recommend the use of GnRH agonist in LPS. LPS should cease on the day of positive HCG. Since the cause of luteal phase defect in IVF appears to be related to the supraphysiological levels of steroids, milder stimulation protocols should be advocated in order to eventually overcome the luteal phase defect.     

IVF/ICSI outcome and serum LH concentration on day 1 of ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH under pituitary suppression

BACKGROUND: Down-regulation with GnRH agonist has been suggested to result in a profound suppression of LH bioactivity, reduced estradiol synthesis, and thus impaired IVF and pregnancy outcome. The aims of this study were: (i) to assess the usefulness of serum LH measurement on stimulation day 1 as a predictor of ovarian response, conception and pregnancy outcome in patients treated with long-term down-regulation with GnRH agonist and recombinant FSH, and (ii) to define the best threshold LH value, if any, to discriminate between women with different outcomes of IVF. METHODS: Records of 2625 cycles in 1652 infertile women undergoing IVF (n = 1856) and/or ICSI (n = 769) treatment were reviewed. RESULTS: The range of LH concentrations on stimulation day 1 overlapped among non-conception cycles, conception cycles, ongoing pregnancies and early pregnancy losses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that serum LH concentrations on stimulation day 1 were unable to discriminate between conception and non-conception cycles (AUC(ROC) = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.49-0.54) or ongoing pregnancies versus early pregnancy loss groups (AUC(ROC) = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.47-0.57). Stratification for various low serum levels of LH did not reveal significant differences with respect to conception or pregnancy outcome among different LH levels on stimulation day 1. CONCLUSIONS: Serum LH concentration on stimulation day 1 cannot predict ovarian response, conception and pregnancy outcome in women receiving long-term down-regulation during assisted reproduction treatment.     

Suppression of the endogenous luteinizing hormone surge by the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist Cetrorelix during ovarian stimulation

Surges of luteinizing hormone (LH) that result In luteinizationbut occur prematurely with respect to the diameter of the leadingfolilde, prevent attempts to induce multiple follicular maturationfor in-vitro fertilization (IVF) in a significant number ofwomen. We examined the possibility of blocking premature LIIsurges by the administration of Cetrorelix, a potent antagonistof gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH), in a study Including20 patients, some of whom had previously shown premature LHsurges. All patients were treated with human menopausal gonadotrophins(HMG) starting on day 2. From day 7 until the induction of ovulationby human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) the GnRII antagon Cetrorelixwas given daily. HCG was injected when the dominant fofficlehad reached a diameter of >18 mm and oestradlol concentrationwas >300 pg/ml for each follicle having a diameter of >15mm. Oocyte collection was performed 36 h later by transvaginalultrasound puncture, followed by IVF and embryo transfer. Thehormone profiles of these patients and the results of IVF andembryo transfer are comparable to those treated with GnRH agonistsand HMG. However, less time and especially less HMG Is neededin comparison to patients stimulated with a long agonist protocol.Hence, treatment with Cetrorelix proved to be much more comfortablefor the patient. In this study we showed that combined treatmentwith gonadotrophins and the GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix is apromising method for ovarian stimulation in patients who frequentlyexhibit premature LH surges and therefore fall to complete treatment.     

Differential effects of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists administered as desensitizing or flare protocols on hormonal function in the luteal phase of hyperstimulated cycles

The incorporation of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) stimulation protocols has led to doubt about the quality of the subsequent luteal phase. The effects of two GnRHa stimulation protocols on luteal phase concentrations of oestradiol (E2), progesterone (P), luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) were compared with the standard clomiphene stimulation regimen. Subjects receiving clomiphene with human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG, n = 377) showed essentially similar luteal phase P concentrations to those receiving leuprolide acetate/HMG as a desensitization protocol. Subjects receiving concomitant leuprolide and HMG from day 2 to utilize the flare effect of the GnRHa exhibited significantly lower P levels in the luteal phase compared to clomiphene/HMG and leuprolide desensitization protocols despite the addition of HCG support. This occurred despite equivalent E2 concentrations at the time of ovulation and identical numbers of oocytes recovered. LH concentrations in non-conception cycles were suppressed for at least 14 days in the luteal phase in both GnRHa protocols compared to clomiphene stimulation. Differences were less obvious in cycles where conception occurred suggesting that implantation may proceed more favourably when the luteal endocrinology was optimal. It is concluded that flare methods of GnRHa hyperstimulation are associated with significantly different luteal phases compared with clomiphene or desensitization protocols. It is proposed that the use of the flare type of stimulation may significantly influence the response of the granulosa cells to LH or HCG via gonadotrophin receptors or through altered post-receptor function.     

LH serum levels during ovarian stimulation as predictors of ovarian response and assisted reproduction outcome in down-regulated women stimulated with recombinant FSH

BACKGROUND: There has been much debate about the effect of 'residual' LH levels in normogonadotrophic women undergoing assisted reproduction with GnRH agonist down-regulation and recombinant FSH ovarian stimulation. The aim of this prospective study, where receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used, was to assess further the usefulness of serum LH levels as predictors of ovarian response, assisted reproduction treatment outcome, and the outcome of pregnancy when measured throughout the ovarian stimulation period in a large cohort of such assisted reproduction treatment women. METHODS: A total of 246 consecutive women undergoing their first cycle of IVF or ICSI treatment were included in this study. Blood samples for hormone analyses were obtained on day S0 (the day when pituitary suppression was evidenced) and every other day from stimulation day 5 (S5) until the day of hCG injection. RESULTS: LH serum levels throughout ovarian stimulation treatment were similar for cancelled (n =32) versus non-cancelled (n = 214) cycles, non-conception (n = 132) versus conception (n = 82) cycles, and ongoing pregnancy (n = 66) versus early pregnancy loss (n = 16) groups. There was no correlation between LH serum levels in non-cancelled cycles and parameters of ovarian response and assisted reproduction treatment outcome. ROC analysis showed that serum LH concentration during ovarian stimulation was unable to discriminate between cancelled and non-cancelled cycles, conception versus non-conception cycles, or early pregnancy loss versus ongoing pregnancy groups. CONCLUSIONS: Serum LH measurements during ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH under pituitary suppression in normogonadotrophic women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment cannot predict ovarian response, IVF/ICSI outcome, implantation, and the outcome of pregnancy. Thus, there is little underlying physiological support for the addition of LH in stimulation protocols if daily doses of an appropriate GnRH agonist (leuprolide or triptorelin having lower potency than buserelin) and a step-down regimen of recombinant FSH administration are used.     

Addition of GnRH antagonist in cycles of poor responders undergoing IVF

Concern about the use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists in ovarian stimulation of poor responder IVF patients has arisen from the claim that GnRH agonists might have a direct deleterious effect through their receptors on the ovary. In this study, we compared two ovarian stimulation protocols in which no GnRH agonists were used. In all, 40 patients with a poor response in previous treatment cycles were included. They were divided into two groups: group I (n = 20) received ovarian stimulation for 20 cycles, without the addition of either GnRH agonist or antagonist; while group II (n = 20) patients received ovarian stimulation for 20 cycles, including the administration of a GnRH antagonist (Cetrorelix, 0.25 mg daily) during the late follicular phase. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for mean age, duration of infertility, baseline FSH concentration, cancellation rate, number of ampoules of gonadotrophin used, number of mature oocytes retrieved, oestradiol concentrations on the day of injection of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), fertilization rate and number of embryos transferred. The clinical pregnancy and implantation rates in group II appeared higher than in group I, but were not significantly different (20 and 13.33% compared with 6.25 and 3.44% respectively). The addition of GnRH antagonists to ovarian stimulation protocols might be a new hope for poor responder IVF patients, but this report is preliminary and further controlled randomized prospective studies with larger sample sizes are required.     

Recombinant human LH supplementation during GnRH antagonist administration in IVF/ICSI cycles: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: When administered in the late follicular phase to prevent an LH surge, GnRH antagonists induce a sharp decrease in serum LH levels that may be detrimental for assisted reproductive technology cycle outcome. Therefore, a prospective study was designed to assess the effects of recombinant human (r)LH supplementation during GnRH antagonist (cetrorelix) administration. METHODS: The protocol consisted of cycle programming with oral contraceptive pill, ovarian stimulation with rFSH and flexible administration of a single dose of cetrorelix (3 mg). A total of 218 patients from three IVF centres were randomized (by sealed envelopes or according to woman's birth date) to receive (n = 114) or not (n = 104) a daily injection of rLH 75 IU from GnRH antagonist initiation to hCG injection. RESULTS: The only significant difference was a higher serum peak E2 level in patients treated with rLH (1476 +/- 787 versus 1012 +/- 659 pg/ml, P < 0.001) whereas the numbers of oocytes and embryos as well as the delivery rate (25.2 versus 24%) and the implantation rate per embryo (19.1 versus 17.4%) were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that in an unselected group of patients, there is no evident benefit to supplement GnRH antagonist-treated cycles with rLH.     

Serum inhibin A, VEGF and TNFalpha levels after triggering oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist compared with HCG in women with polycystic ovaries undergoing IVF treatment: a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND: We aimed to examine the serum levels of inhibin A, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha), estradiol (E2) and progesterone levels after triggering of final oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist compared with HCG in patients with polycystic ovaries (PCO) and to investigate the relationship between these markers and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with PCO, undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with FSH and GnRH antagonist for IVF-embryo transfer treatment, were randomized for triggering of final oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist (GnRH agonist group, n = 15) or HCG (HCG group, n = 13). Blood samples were obtained on the day of randomization and thereafter every 2-7 days. Serum levels of inhibin A, VEGF, TNFalpha, E2 and progesterone, the incidence of OHSS, ovarian size and pelvic fluid accumulation were evaluated. RESULTS: Serum inhibin A, E2 and progesterone levels were significantly lower in the GnRH agonist group compared with the HCG group, particularly on the day of embryo transfer (P < 0.0001). Serum VEGF and TNFalpha levels were similar between the two groups. Four patients in the HCG group developed severe OHSS, whereas no patient had any symptoms or signs of OHSS in the GnRH-agonist group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PCO treated with FSH/GnRH antagonist, final oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist instead of HCG reduces significantly inhibin A, E2 and progesterone levels during the luteal phase. This phenomenon reflects the inhibition of the corpus luteum function and may explain, at least in part, the mechanism of OHSS prevention in high-risk patients. Our results do not support a crucial role for VEGF or TNFalpha in OHSS.     

Consequences on gonadotrophin secretion of an early discontinuation of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist administration in short-term protocol for in-vitro fertilization

Administration of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRHa) agonists, used in IVF short-term protocols to initiate follicular recruitment, may be restricted to the early follicular phase without any further risk of LH surge. However, consequences of an early discontinuation upon residual endogenous gonadotrophin secretion are still unknown. Here, the effects of early cessation of GnRH agonist upon gonadotrophin secretion and ovarian parameters of IVF cycles were investigated. A total of 230 normo-ovulatory women were prospectively allocated to one of the two regimens: decapeptyl-GnRH (100 microgram) was daily injected either from day 1 to the triggering of ovulation (group 1) or for the first 7 days (group 2). Exogenous gonadotrophins (150 IU) were administered on day 4 and 5 with a subsequent adjustment. Detections of free alpha subunit and dimeric LH were performed by highly specific 'two site' monoclonal immunoradiometric assays. The results show that early discontinuation of GnRH agonist administration was associated with a sharp decrease in both plasma free alpha subunit and dimeric LH concentrations while plasma oestradiol response to exogenous gonadotrophins was reduced. Other ovarian parameters and pregnancy rate were unchanged. These data indicate that endogenous LH secretion is maintained by a daily administration of GnRH agonist and may contribute to the final follicular maturation.