Onset of bronchodilation of budesonide/formoterol vs. salmeterol/fluticasone in single inhalers

Combinations of inhaled glucocorticoids and long-acting beta2-agonists in the same inhaler device have become available in recent years. In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled and crossover study we have evaluated the onset of action of budesonide and formoterol in a single inhaler (Symbicort Turbuhaler) and that of the fixed combination of salmeterol and fluticasone (Seretide Diskus). Thirty patients with a mean FEV1 of 2.54 l (range: 1.48-4.28) and a mean inclusion reversibility in FEV1 of 19.1% were included. Single doses of budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 microg and 2x (160/4.5) microg, salmeterol/fluticasone 50/250 microg, or placebo were given. Serial measurements of FEV1 were performed over 3 h. The combination of one or two inhalations of budesonide/formoterol showed a faster onset of action than salmeterol/fluticasone, both evaluated as mean FEV1 at 3 min (2.74, 2.75 and 2.56 l respectively P<0.001 for both doses of budesonide/formoterol), or as average FEV1 from 0 to 15 min (2.80, 2.83 and 2.67 l respectively P<0.001 for both doses of budesonide/formoterol). For placebo, mean FEV1 at 3 min was 2.46 l, and the average FEV1 at 0-15 min was 2.50 l. Furthermore, budesonide/formoterol at both doses resulted in higher FEV1 than salmeterol/fluticasone at 3 h. We conclude that the combination of budesonide/formoterol has a faster onset of action than salmeterol/fluticasone.     

Budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler rapidly relieves methacholine-induced moderate-to-severe bronchoconstriction

Inhalers containing corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-agonists are becoming increasingly important in asthma management. A rapid effect is important to patients, particularly during exacerbations. We compared the onset of bronchodilation and patient-perceived relief from dyspnoea following single-inhaler budesonide/formoterol or salmeterol/fluticasone in a model of acute bronchoconstriction. A randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, single-dose, crossover study included 27 outpatients with asthma (mean age 35 years; mean FEV1 90% predicted normal). Immediately following methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction (fall in FEV1 > or = 30%), patients inhaled budesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 microg, 1 or 2 inhalations; Symbicort Turbuhaler), salmeterol/fluticasone (50/250 microg; Seretide Diskus) or placebo on 4 study days. Lung function and Borg score were assessed for 30 min. During methacholine-induced provocation (final mean FEV1 62.5% of baseline), mean Borg score increased 10-fold (from 0.3 to 3.0 units). Hereafter, mean FEV1 at 3 min improved significantly more after budesonide/formoterol 1 and 2 inhalations (37 and 38%, respectively) than after salmeterol/fluticasone (23%; P < 0.001) or placebo (10%; P < 0.001). Median recovery times to 85% of baseline FEV1 were shorter for budesonide/formoterol (1 or 2 inhalations: 3.3 and 2.8 min, respectively) than salmeterol/fluticasone (8.9 min; P < 0.001) and placebo (> 30 min). One min after budesonide/formoterol, dyspnoea was significantly reduced (Borg score -0.86 units, both doses) compared with salmeterol/fluticasone (-0.55 units; P < 0.05) and placebo (-0.23 units; P < 0.001). Budesonide/formoterol provides immediate bronchodilation, faster than salmeterol/fluticasone, which patients can feel during acute methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction.     

Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy: an effective asthma treatment option?

This 12-month dose-titration study assessed the effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol for maintenance plus relief with a control group using salmeterol/fluticasone for maintenance plus salbutamol for relief. Adolescents and adults (n = 2,143; mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 73% predicted; mean inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) 884 microg.day(-1)) were randomised to budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 microg two inhalations b.i.d. plus additional inhalations as needed, or salmeterol/fluticasone 50/250 microg b.i.d. plus salbutamol as needed. Treatment was prescribed open label; after 4 weeks, physicians could titrate maintenance doses in accordance with normal clinical practice. Maintenance plus as-needed budesonide/formoterol prolonged the time to first severe exacerbation versus salmeterol/fluticasone (25% risk reduction). The total number of severe exacerbations was significantly reduced in the budesonide/formoterol group (255 versus 329). Both regimens provided sustained improvements in symptoms, as-needed use, quality of life and FEV1, with differences in favour of the budesonide/formoterol group for as-needed use (0.58 versus 0.93 inhalations.day(-1)) and FEV1 (post-beta2-agonist values). Mean ICS dose during treatment was similar in both groups (653 microg budesonide.day(-1) (maintenance plus as-needed) versus 583 microg fluticasone.day(-1)). The simplified strategy using budesonide/formoterol for maintenance and reliever therapy is feasible, safe and at least as effective as salmeterol/fluticasone plus salbutamol.     

Onset of action of formoterol/budesonide in single inhaler vs. formoterol in patients with COPD

Formoterol is a beta(2)-agonist bronchodilator that combines a fast onset of action with a long duration of broncholytic effect. An increasing documentation is showing that the combination of a long acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist bronchodilator and an inhaled corticosteroid targets the airways obstruction in patients with COPD. In this study, we have explored whether the acute addition of an inhaled corticosteroid influences the fast bronchodilator response to formoterol. A total of 20 patients with stable COPD were randomized. Single doses of formoterol/budesonide 2 x (4.5/160)microg or formoterol 2 x 4.5 microg were given via Turbuhaler. Serial measurements of FEV(1) were performed over 60 min. Formoterol/budesonide elicited a significantly larger mean FEV(1)-AUC(0-15 min) than formoterol alone. Also the change in FEV(1) 15 min after inhalation of formoterol/budesonide combination (0.197 l; 95% CI: to 0.142-0.252) was greater than that induced by formoterol alone (0.147 l; 95% CI: to 0.092-0.201). The mean increases in FEV(1) were always higher after budesonide/formoterol than formoterol alone, although both treatments induced a significant improvement over baseline at each explored time point. Even the FEV(1)-AUC(0-60 min) after formoterol/budesonide was significantly larger than that after formoterol. Both treatments induced a significant reduction in VAS score but did not modify heart rate in a statistically significant manner. This study indicates that the addition of budesonide influences the fast onset of action of formoterol, but does not induce systemic effects, in patients with stable COPD.     

Acute effects of higher than customary doses of salmeterol and salbutamol in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD

Worsening of underlying bronchospasm may be associated with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). As airway obstruction becomes more severe, the therapeutic option is to add salbutamol, but not salmeterol, as needed to cause rapid relief of bronchospasm. Unfortunately the most effective dosage of beta2-agonists may increase above that recommended during acute exacerbations. In this study, we compared the acute effects of higher than customary doses of salmeterol and salbutamol in 20 patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. A dose-response curve to salmeterol pMDI, 25 microg/puff or salbutamol pMDI, 100 microg/puff, was constructed using 1, 1, and 2 puff' i.e., a total cumulative dose of 100 microg salmeterol or 400 microg salbutamol on 2 consecutive days. After baseline measurements, dose increments were given at 30-min intervals with measurements being made 25 min after each dose. Hear rate (HR) and pulse-oximetry (SpO2) measurements were then taken. Both salmeterol and salbutamol induced a larg and significant (P < 0.05) dose-dependent increase in FEV1 [mean differences from baseline (L) = after 100 microg salmeterol 0.174 (95% CI: 0.112 to 0.237); after 400 microg salbutamol: 0.165 (95% CI: 0.080 to 0.249)], in IC [mean differences from baseline (L) = after 100 microg salmeterol: 0.332 (95% CI: 0.165 to 0.499); after 400 microg salbutamol: 0.281 (95% CI: 0.107 to 0.456)] (Fig. 2), and in FVC mean differences from baseline (L) = after 100 microg salmeterol: 0.224 (95% CI: 0.117 to 0.331); after 400 microg salbutamol: 0.242 (95% CI: 0.090 to 0.395)]. There was no significant difference between the FEV1 values (P=0.418), the ICvalues (P=0.585), and the FVCvalue (P=0.610) after 100 microg salmeterol and 400 microg salbutamol. HR [mean differences from baseline (beats/min) = after 100 microg salmeterol: 3.15 (95% CI: -0.65 to 6.96); after 400 microg salbutamol: 2.30 (95% CI: -0.91 to 5.51)] and SpO2 [mean differences from baseline (%) = after 100 microg salmeterol: -0.20 (95% CI: -1.00 to 0.60); after 400 microg salbutamol: -0.11 (95% CI: -1.00 to 0.79)] did not change significantly from baseline (P > 0.05). These data indicate that salmeterol is effective and safe in the treatment of acute exacerbation of COPD and support its use in this clinical condition.     

Budesonide/formoterol for maintenance and relief in uncontrolled asthma vs. high-dose salmeterol/fluticasone

BACKGROUND: Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy (Symbicort SMART) improves asthma control compared with fixed-dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta(2)-agonist (ICS/LABA) regimens, but its efficacy has not been assessed in comparison with sustained high-dose salmeterol/fluticasone (Seretide) plus a short-acting beta(2)-agonist (SABA). METHODS: Patients (N=2309) with symptomatic asthma (aged 12 years; forced expiratory volume in 1s 50% predicted), who had experienced an asthma exacerbation in the previous year, were randomised to receive budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 microg two inhalations twice daily and as needed, or one inhalation of salmeterol/fluticasone 50/500 microg twice daily plus terbutaline as needed, for 6 months. RESULTS: Time to first severe exacerbation, the pre-specified primary outcome, was not significantly prolonged (risk ratio 0.82; 95% confidence interval 0.63, 1.05). Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy reduced total exacerbations from 31 to 25 events/100 patients/year (P=0.039), and exacerbations requiring hospitalisation/emergency room (ER) treatment from 13 to 9 events/100 patients/year (P=0.046). The treatments showed no difference in measures of lung function or asthma symptoms. The mean dose of ICS received was lower using budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy (792 microg/day budesonide [1238 microg/day beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) equivalent] versus 1000 microg/day fluticasone [2000 microg/day BDP equivalent] with salmeterol/fluticasone therapy; P<0.0001). Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of uncontrolled asthma, budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy reduces the incidence of severe asthma exacerbations and hospitalisation/ER treatment with similar daily symptom control compared with sustained high-dose salmeterol/fluticasone plus SABA. This benefit is achieved with substantially less ICS exposure.     

A proof of concept study to evaluate stepping down the dose of fluticasone in combination with salmeterol and tiotropium in severe persistent asthma

We conducted a double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover study evaluating the effects of halving inhaled steroid dosage plus salmeterol, or salmeterol and tiotropium. Eighteen life-long non-smoking severe asthmatics [mean FEV(1) 1.49 l (51%)] were run-in for 4 weeks on HFA-fluticasone propionate 1000 microg daily, and were subsequently randomised to 4 weeks of either (a) HFA-fluticasone propionate 500 microg BD/salmeterol 100 microg BD/HFA-tiotropium bromide18 microg od; or (b) fluticasone propionate 500 microg BD/salmeterol 100 microg BD matched placebo. Measurements of spirometry and body plethysmography were made. Adding salmeterol to half the dose of fluticasone led to a mean improvement (95% CI) vs. baseline in morning PEF of 41.5 (14.0-69.0)l/min [p<0.05]; and RAW of 0.98 (0.14-1.8)cm H(2)O/l/s [p<0.05]. Adding salmeterol/tiotropium produced similar improvements in PEF and RAW, but also improved FEV(1) by 0.17 (0.01-0.32)l [p<0.05]; FVC 0.24 (0.05-0.43)l [p<0.05] and reduced exhaled NO by 2.86 (0.12-5.6)ppb [p<0.05]. RV and TLC were not altered by either treatment; there were no significant changes in symptoms or quality of life compared with baseline. Addition of salmeterol/tiotropium to half the dose of fluticasone afforded small, but significant improvements in pulmonary function. These effects were not associated with commensurate changes in subjective symptoms or quality of life.     

Additive effects of salmeterol and fluticasone or theophylline in COPD

BACKGROUND: ss(2)-Agonists and corticosteroids or theophylline can interact to produce beneficial effects on airway function in asthma, but this has not been established in COPD. METHODS: Eighty patients with well-controlled COPD were randomized to receive 3 months of treatment in one of four treatment groups: (1) salmeterol, 50 microg bid; (2) salmeterol, 50 microg, plus fluticasone propionate, 250 microg bid; (3) salmeterol, 50 microg, plus fluticasone propionate, 500 microg bid; and (4) salmeterol, 50 microg, plus titrated theophylline bid. At each visit, a dose-response curve to inhaled salbutamol was constructed using a total cumulative dose of 800 microg. RESULTS: A gradual increase in FEV(1) was observed with each of the four treatments. Maximum significant increases in FEV(1) over baseline values that were observed after 3 months of treatment were as follows: salmeterol, 50 microg bid, 0.163 L (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.080 to 0.245 L); salmeterol, 50 microg, plus fluticasone propionate, 250 microg bid, 0.188 L (95% CI, 0.089 to 0. 287 L); salmeterol, 50 microg, plus fluticasone propionate, 500 microg bid, 0.239 L (95% CI, 0.183 to 0.296 L); and salmeterol, 50 microg, plus titrated theophylline bid, 0.157 L (95% CI, 0.027 to 0. 288 L). Salbutamol always caused a significant dose-dependent increase in FEV(1) (p < 0.001), although the 800-microg dose never induced further significant benefit when compared with the 400-microg dose. The mean differences between the highest salbutamol FEV(1) after salmeterol, 50 microg, plus fluticasone propionate, 500 microg bid, and that after salmeterol, 50 microg, plus titrated theophylline bid or salmeterol, 50 microg bid, were statistically significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These data show that both long-acting ss(2)-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids have a role in COPD. The data also show that fluticasone propionate and salmeterol given together are more effective than salmeterol alone. Moreover, it suggests that the addition of fluticasone propionate to salmeterol allows a greater improvement in lung function after salbutamol, although regular salmeterol is able to improve lung function in COPD patients without development of a true subsensitivity to its bronchodilator effect. In any case, patients must be treated for at least 3 months before a real improvement in lung function is achieved.     

Onset of action of single doses of formoterol administered via Turbuhaler in patients with stable COPD

We studied 16 patients with stable COPD in a double blind, double dummy, placebo-controlled, within patient study to see if formoterol could be used as a rescue drug. We compared the of onset of bronchodilation obtained with formoterol 12 microg (metered dose corresponding to 9 microg delivered dose) and formoterol 24 microg (metered dose corresponding to 18 microg delivered dose), both delivered via Turbuhaler, with that of salbutamol 400 microg and salbutamol 800 microg delivered via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI). Patients inhaled single doses of placebo, formoterol and salbutamol on five separate days. FEV1 was measured in baseline condition and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 40, 50, and 60 min after inhalation of each treatment. We examined two separate criteria for deciding if a response was greater than that expected by a random variation of the measurement: (1) a rise in FEV1 of at least 15% from the baseline value; (2) an absolute increase in FEV1 of at least 200 ml. Formoterol 12 microg (15.2 min; 95% CI 9.5-21.0) and formoterol 24 microg (15.1 min; 95% CI 8.9-21.2) caused a rise in FEV1 of at least 15% from the baseline value almost rapidly as salbutamol 400 microg (13.6 min; 95% CI 7.1-20.1) and salbutamol 800 microg (14.5 min; 95% CI 7.1-21.9). No significant difference (P=0.982) in onset of action was seen between the four active treatments. According to Criterion 2, the mean time to 200 ml increase in FEV1 was 11.1 min (95% CI: 7.0-15.2) after salbutamol 400 microg, 13.0 min (95% CI: 7.9-18.1) after salbutamol 800 microg, 14.7 min (95% CI: 7.1-22.4) after formoterol 12 microg, and 12.7 min (95% CI: 7.4-18.0) after formoterol 24 microg. Again, there was no significant difference (P= 0.817) between the four active treatments. Formoterol Turbuhaler 12 microg and 24 microg caused bronchodilation as rapidly as salbutamol 400 microg and 800 microg given via pMDI.     

Formoterol and salmeterol in partially reversible chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A crossover, placebo-controlled comparison of onset and duration of action.

BACKGROUND: In contrast to the well-known activity profile in asthma, the precise efficacy and optimum dose schedules of long-acting beta(2)-agonists in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are not clear. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to compare the onset and the duration of action of a single inhalation of formoterol and salmeterol in COPD patients having partially reversible airway obstruction. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, crossover and placebo-controlled study design, the respiratory functions of 22 patients (mean age 57.3+/-5.4 years) having mild to severe COPD (5 mild, 8 moderate and 9 severe) and partially reversible airway obstruction [mean baseline reversibility of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) 19.3+/-3.1%] were evaluated after inhalation of 12 microg formoterol and 50 microg salmeterol. RESULTS: Regarding the onset of bronchodilator action, the mean absolute increase of 0.20 liters in FEV(1) 10 min after inhalation of formoterol was significantly higher than baseline and that of placebo (0.04 liters), whereas that of salmeterol (0.11 liters) did not reach statistical significance. At 20 min, both formoterol (0.25 liters) and salmeterol (0.20 liters) produced a significant increase in FEV(1) compared with baseline and with that of placebo (0.04 liters). The peak bronchodilator effects occurring at 60 and 120 min following formoterol (0.39 liters) and salmeterol (0.40 liters) inhalation, respectively, were significantly higher than the corresponding levels of placebo (0.02 and -0.12 liters, respectively). Concerning the duration of action, the 12-hour values of both formoterol (0.25 liters) and salmeterol (0.22 liters) were significantly higher than that of placebo (-0.12 liters). The area under the curve values of FEV(1) of formoterol (3.5+/-1.3 l.h) and salmeterol (3.2+/-1.2 l x h) averaged over 12 h were comparable and higher than placebo values (1.2+/-0.5 l x h). After formoterol inhalation 2 patients experienced tremor and 1 had palpitation; 1 tremor and 1 headache attack were noted after salmeterol. For the pharmacologically predictable side effects, there was no difference between the drugs. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this study revealed that a single dose of 12 microg formoterol and 50 microg salmeterol provided comparable bronchodilation within 12 h and had tolerable side effects in patients with mild to severe COPD having partially reversible airway obstruction.     

Comparison of a combination of tiotropium plus formoterol to salmeterol plus fluticasone in moderate COPD

BACKGROUND: A 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted in patients with COPD to compare lung function improvements of tiotropium, 18 microg qd, plus formoterol, 12 microg bid, to salmeterol, 50 microg bid, plus fluticasone, 500 microg bid. METHODS: Following a screening visit, subjects entered a run-in period in which they received regular ipratropium. At randomization, patients were assigned to either tiotropium plus formoterol or salmeterol plus fluticasone. After 6 weeks of treatment, a 12-h lung function profile was obtained. The coprimary end points were FEV(1) area under the curve for the time period 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)) and peak FEV(1). RESULTS: A total of 729 patients were screened, and 605 patients were randomized and treated. A total of 592 patients (baseline FEV(1), 1.32 +/- 0.43 L/min [+/-SD]) were included in the analysis. After 6 weeks, the 12-h lung function profiles in the group receiving tiotropium plus formoterol were superior to those in the group receiving salmeterol plus fluticasone (mean difference in FEV(1) AUC(0-12), 78 mL [p = 0.0006]; mean difference in FVC AUC(0-12), 173 mL, p < 0.0001). Also, peak responses were in favor of tiotropium plus formoterol (difference in peak FEV(1), 103 mL [p < 0.0001]; difference in peak FVC, 214 mL [p < 0.0001]), as were FEV(1) and FVC at each individual time point after dose (p < 0.05). Predose FVC was significantly higher with the bronchodilator combination, while predose FEV(1) and rescue medication use did not differ significantly between groups. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Tiotropium plus formoterol was superior in lung function over the day compared to salmeterol plus fluticasone in patients with moderate COPD. Long-term studies in patients with severe COPD are warranted to assess the relative efficacy of different treatment combinations. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00239421.     

Comparison of the effects of salmeterol and formoterol in patients with severe asthma

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Several studies have demonstrated the superiority of salmeterol and formoterol to either regular treatment with albuterol or placebo. However, to date there have been no trials comparing the efficacy of salmeterol and formoterol in patients with severe asthma. DESIGN: We undertook a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study to compare 4 weeks of treatment with inhaled formoterol (12 microg twice daily) or salmeterol (50 microg twice daily) in patients with severe asthma whose conditions were not being adequately controlled by therapy with high doses of inhaled corticosteroids (i.e., > or = 1,500 microg daily) or with regular oral corticosteroid treatment. Morning pretreatment peak expiratory flow (PEF) during the last 14 days of the treatment period was the primary outcome variable. Patients recorded morning and evening pretreatment PEF, daytime and nighttime symptom scores, and any use of rescue medication. Spirometry and bronchial reversibility were performed after each treatment. RESULTS: Forty-two nonsmoking patients (29 women; mean age, 45 +/- 2 years; mean [+/- SEM] FEV(1), 61.8 +/- 3.4% of predicted) took part in the trial, and 27 patients completed the trial. The mean morning PEF was greater in patients receiving formoterol (mean increase, 14.4 L/min; 95% confidence interval [CI]. 0.2 to 28.6) or salmeterol (mean increase, 14.8 L/min; 95% CI, 0.5 to 29.1) compared with those receiving placebo, but there was no difference between these treatments. There were no significant treatment effects for any of the secondary outcome variables (i.e., FEV(1,) FVC, mean evening PEF, mean daytime symptom score, or nighttime symptom score). CONCLUSION: We conclude that the long-acting beta(2)-agonists salmeterol and formoterol improve morning PEF in patients with severe asthma, but that there is no difference in efficacy between the two drugs.     

Bronchodilator response to formoterol after regular tiotropium or to tiotropium after regular formoterol in COPD patients

We conducted a randomized, crossover trial with tiotropium 18 microg once daily (group A), and formoterol 12 microg twice daily (group B) over a 5-day period for each drug, with a 10-day washout, in 20 COPD patients. At the end of each period, patients inhaled both drugs separated by 180 min in alternate sequence (group A: tiotropium 18 microg+formoterol 12 microg; group B: formoterol 12 microg+tiotropium 18 microg). FEV1 and FVC were measured at baseline and after 30, 60, 120, 180, 210, 240, 300 and 360 min. FEV1 and FVC further improved after crossover with both sequences. The mean maximal change in FEV1 over baseline was 0.226 L (0.154-0.298) after tiotropium+formoterol and 0.228 L (0.165-0.291) after formoterol+tiotropium; the mean maximal change in FEV1 over pre-inhalation the second drug value was 0.081 L (0.029-0.133) after tiotropium+formoterol and 0.054 L (0.016-0.092) after formoterol+tiotropium. The mean maximal change in FVC over baseline was 0.519 L (0.361-0.676) after tiotropium+formoterol and 0.495 L (0.307-0.683) after formoterol+tiotropium; the mean maximal change in FVC over pre-inhalation of the second drug value was 0.159 L (0.048-0.270) after tiotropium+formoterol and 0.175 L (0.083-0.266) after formoterol+tiotropium. The FEV1 AUCs(0-360 min) were 62.70 (45.67-79.74) after tiotropium+formoterol and 69.20 (50.84-87.57) after formoterol+tiotropium, the FEV1 AUCs(0-180 min) were 24.70 (18.19-31.21) after tiotropium+formoterol and 29.74 (21.02-38.46) after formoterol+tiotropium, whereas the FEV1 AUCs(180-360 min) were 15.70 (10.88-20.52) after tiotropium+formoterol and 11.71 (7.21-16.21) after formoterol+tiotropium. Differences between the two treatments were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The addition of second different long-acting bronchodilator to a regularly administered long-acting bronchodilator seems to be to patient's advantage.     

Addition of an extra dose of salmeterol Diskus to conventional dose of salmeterol Diskus in patients with COPD

Patients experiencing dyspnoea can request an additional dose of salmeterol during the dose interval for the control of their symptoms, although under treatment with salmeterol. In this study we have explored the effects on respiratory function of an additive dose of salmeterol Diskus in 15 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients in regular treatment with a conventional dose of 50 microg salmeterol. On two different days, patients inhaled 50 microg Diskus. After 240 min, they inhaled additional 50 microg salmeterol Diskus (salmeterol arm) or placebo Diskus (placebo arm). Lung function was controlled before first drug administration and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 4.5, 6, 8, 10, and 12 h thereafter. The mean (95% CI) peak increase in FEV1 from baseline was reached after 4 h in the salmeterol arm (0.174 L; 0.144-0204) and after 5 h (0.141 L; 0.115-0.168) inthe placebo arm; after 12 h, the mean (95% Cl) increase in FEV1 from basal values was still 0.149 L (0.119-0.179) in salmeterol arm, but only 0.041 L (0.017-0.064) in placebo arm. The mean (95% CI) FEV1 AUC0-12h for all patients were 2.01 (1.72-2.30) L when salmeterol was added and 1.30 (1.03-1.58) L when placebo was inhaled. The difference (mean; 95% CI) between the FEV1 AUC0-12h of the two arms (0.71 L; 0.47-0.95) was statistically significant (P<0.0001), although the difference (mean; 95% CI) between the FEV1 AUC0-4h of the two treatments (0.08 L; -0.02-0.18) was notstatistically significant (P=0.126). The addition of an extra dose of salmeterol did not significantly increase the heart rate or decrease the SpO2. This study suggests that the addition of an extra dose of salmeterol does not give room for further increase in peak FEV1, but the effect of adding salmeterol to salmeterol is largely additive when considering the duration of action and safe.     

Profiles of measured and perceived bronchodilation. A placebo-controlled cross-over trial comparing formoterol and salmeterol in moderate persistent asthma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Long-acting beta(2)-agonists have acquired an indispensable position in the management of bronchial symptoms in patients with asthma. The objective of this study was to compare onset-of-action and clinical effectiveness of formoterol and salmeterol during 2 weeks of treatment. We also investigated the association between bronchodilator effects and perceived relieve of dyspnoea. METHODS: A multi-centre randomized double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over trial was performed in 35 subjects with moderate persistent asthma. Treatment periods existed of 2 weeks formoterol (12 microg bid), salmeterol (50 microg bid) and placebo, all administered by pressurized metered dose inhaler. FEV(1) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were repeatedly measured until 180 min post-bronchodilation (post-BD), before as well as after each treatment period. Onset-of-action was defined as a >/=15% increase in FEV(1). Subjects kept diaries of morning and evening PEFR values and use of rescue bronchodilator. RESULTS: Formoterol and salmeterol both caused a significant increase in FEV(1) (0.45L [95% CI 0.01, 0.80] and 0.27L [95% CI 0.08, 0.62] respectively). At 3' post-BD, three times as many subjects demonstrated onset-of-action on formoterol compared to salmeterol (36% versus 13%, P = 0.063), at 6' post-BD 42% versus 27% (P = 0.063). VAS scores were similar for formoterol and salmeterol at pre-treatment assessment, but tended to be higher for formoterol after 2weeks treatment. No differences between formoterol and salmeterol were observed for PEFR values or use of rescue medication. 50% of the subjects preferred formoterol, 29% salmeterol (P < 0.001). Significant associations between FEV(1) and VAS ratings existed only at 10', 15' and 30' post-BD, not before or after these time points. CONCLUSION: The earlier described faster onset-of-action of formoterol as compared to a equipotent dosage of salmeterol was confirmed in this study. Perception of decreasing airflow obstruction may be delayed after acute bronchodilation.     

吸入福莫特罗/布地奈德对稳定期COPD患者的疗效观察

目的观察长期吸入福莫特罗/布地奈德治疗稳定期慢性阻塞性肺部疾病(COPD)的疗效。方法对94例稳定期COPD患者进行随机分为4组:A组:吸入福莫特罗/布地奈德,B组吸入沙莫特罗/氟地卡松,C组口服茶碱类缓释剂或长效茶碱类药物,D组不用任何药物。治疗1年。评估肺功能(FEV1,FEV1/FVC)、AECOPD情况及治疗满意度。疗效比较采用优势检验。结果94例全部完成1年随访,吸入福莫特罗/布地奈德组和吸入沙莫特罗/氟地卡松组明显减缓肺功能的恶化,明显减少AECOPD的次数及延迟首次AECOPD时间;同时发现吸入福莫特罗/布地奈德组较其他三组有着明显的较好治疗满意度。结论吸入福莫特罗/布地奈德由于起效快且持续时间长,在改善症状方面优于吸入沙莫特罗/氟地卡松,具有较好的依从性。     

Once-daily budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler in adults with moderate persistent asthma

Patients with moderate persistent asthma (n = 523; mean FEV1 77.4%) not fully controlled with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS; 400-1000 microg/day) were randomized to receive either once-daily budesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 microg, two inhalations); or twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 microg, one inhalation); or budesonide (400 microg) once-daily for 12 weeks. Once-daily dosing was administered in the evening and twice-daily dosing was administered in the morning and evening. All patients received twice-daily budesonide (200 microg) during a 2-week run-in. Compared with budesonide alone, change in mean morning and evening peak expiratory flow was greater in the once-daily budesonide/formoterol group (27 and 171 min(-1), respectively; P < 0.001) and twice-daily budesonide/formoterol group (23 and 24 l min(-1), respectively; P < 0.001). Night awakenings, symptom-free days, reliever-use-free days and asthma-control days were all improved during once-daily budesonide/formoterol therapy vs. budesonide (P < or = 0.05). Similar improvements were also seen with twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (P < or = 0.05). The risk of a mild exacerbation was reduced after once- and twice-daily budesonide/formoterol vs. budesonide (38% and 35%, respectively; P < 0.002). All treatments were well tolerated. Budesonide/formoterol, once- or twice-daily, in a single inhaler improved asthma symptoms and exacerbations compared with budesonide. In the majority of patients with moderate persistent asthma requiring ICS and long-acting beta-agonists, once-daily formoterol/budesonide provided sustained efficacy over 24 h, similar to twice-daily dosing.     

Incremental benefit of adding oxitropium bromide to formoterol in patients with stable COPD.

The effects of the long-acting beta(2)-agonist formoterol, the anticholinergic drug oxitropium bromide, and their combination were compared in 16 patients with partially reversible stable COPD. On each of 4 study days patients inhaled both drugs separated by 180 min in alternate sequence, with formoterol being administered in two doses (formoterol 12 microg + oxitropium bromide 200 microg; oxitropium bromide 200 microg + formoterol 12 microg; formoterol 24 microg + oxitropium bromide 200 microg; oxitropium bromide 200 microg + formoterol 24 microg). FEV(1)and FVC were measured baseline and after 30, 60, 120, 180, 210, 240, 300 and 360 min. In terms of onset of action, formoterol performed better than oxitropium bromide. Within the first 180 min after inhalation formoterol 24 microg was the most effective drug (maximal change in FEV(1): formoterol 24 microg = 25.6%, formoterol 12 microg = 21.1%, oxitropium bromide = 18.2%). Increased bronchodilation was obtained when the second drug was added, the sequence formoterol 24 microg + oxitropium bromide being the most effective (maximal change in FEV(1)over baseline: formoterol 24 microg + oxitropium bromide 28.8%, oxitropium bromide + formoterol 24 microg 20.9%, formoterol 12 microg + oxitropium bromide 26.6%, oxitropium bromide + formoterol 12 microg 22.5%). Significant improvement in pulmonary function may be achieved by giving two different bronchodilators in stable COPD patients. The sequence formoterol 24 microg + oxitropium bromide 200 microg seems to be the most effective.     

Once-daily dosing with budesonide/formoterol compared with twice-daily budesonide/formoterol and once-daily budesonide in adults with mild to moderate asthma

Adherence to maintenance therapy is often poor in patients with asthma. Simplifying dosing regimens has the potential to improve both adherence and asthma-related morbidity. In this 12-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study, 617 patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma (mean forced expiratory volume in 1s [FEV1] 78.5% predicted) who were not optimally controlled on inhaled corticosteroids (200-500 microg/day) were randomized to once-daily budesonide/formoterol (80/4.5 microg, 2 inhalations in the evening), twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (80/4.5 microg, 1 inhalation), or a corresponding dose of budesonide once-daily (200 microg, 1 inhalation in the evening). All patients received budesonide (100 microg twice daily) during a 2-week run-in. Changes in mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) were similar for od budesonide/formoterol (23.4 l/min) and twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (24.1 l/min), and both were greater than with budesonide (5.5 l/min; both P<0.001). Evening PEF, symptom-free days, reliever-free days, and asthma control days were improved with budesonide/formoterol therapy vs. budesonide (P<0.05 vs. budesonide for all variables). All treatments were well tolerated. Budesonide/formoterol administered once daily in the evening is a convenient treatment regimen that is as effective in improving asthma control as twice-daily dosing in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma.