Phase II safety and immunogenicity study of type F botulinum toxoid in adult volunteers

An aluminum hydroxide (alum)-adsorbed, purified, botulinum F toxoid (Bot F) vaccine was manufactured to be administered as a stand-alone monovalent vaccine or to be added to the current botulinum pentavalent toxoid vaccine to make a hexavalent vaccine. We conducted a phase II trial of the Bot F vaccine over 3 years in 144 healthy adult volunteers to identify one of three vaccination schedules that was safe and maximally immunogenic for adult volunteers. We vaccinated 116 volunteers 1-3 times with Bot vaccine, and 28 volunteers 1-3 times with a licensed, alum-adsorbed hepatitis B vaccine (Engerix-B) as a reaction control group. After 1 year, 42 Bot volunteers with low, mouse anti-toxin titers (<0.10 IU/ml) received a booster injection and were followed for an additional year. The Bot vaccine inoculated three times over 28-42 days was generally well tolerated and safe, whether injected by the subcutaneous (s.c.) or intramuscular (i.m.) route, although it caused significantly more local reactions than did the HBV vaccine. Two vaccination schedules of three primary injections over 42 days (days 0, 14 and 42 or days 0, 21 and 42) provided significantly better protective immunity (anti-toxin levels >0.02 IU/ml) than did vaccinations given over 28 days (days 0, 7 and 28). Vaccine reactogenicity and immunogenicity were similar over 42 days whether administered subcutaneously or intramuscularly. However, even the most immunogenic schedule left 7-16% of volunteers unprotected at day 56 and 33-42% of vaccinees unprotected at 1 year. The booster dose administered at 1 year induced high levels of protective serum anti-toxin in all persons assayed which persisted for at least one additional year. A more potent vaccine formulation will be required to protect more individuals after primary immunization.     

Notice of CDC's discontinuation of investigational pentavalent (ABCDE) botulinum toxoid vaccine for workers at risk for occupational exposure to botulinum toxins

Effective November 30, 2011, CDC will no longer provide investigational pentavalent (ABCDE) botulinum toxoid (PBT) for vaccination of workers at risk for occupational exposure to botulinum serotypes A, B, C, D, and E. This change might affect persons working in public health laboratories, research facilities, and manufacturing institutions who work with botulinum toxin or neurotoxin-producing species of Clostridium. CDC's decision is based on an assessment of the available data, which indicate a decline in immunogenicity of some of the toxin serotypes. The occurrence of moderate local reactions related to annual booster doses also has increased, which was noted in the 1990s at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases and resulted in a change in boosting from an annual requirement to only boosting when antibody titers have declined significantly. Additionally, the PBT was manufactured more than 30 years ago. CDC, therefore, has decided not to continue offering this investigational product.     

Production and immunogenic efficacy of botulinum tetravalent (A,B, E,F) toxoid

A tetravalent (type A, B, E and F) toxoid was produced and its efficacy and safety were assessed. The toxoid preparation was inoculated from two to five times to 15 healthy adult volunteers participating in botulinum toxin research.The serum samples taken from the toxoid recipients were titrated for the antitoxin potencies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the neutralization test. The neutralizing and ELISA titers were too low to correlate each other. The mean neutralization titer of four recipients in 9 months after three doses of toxoid was about 0.1IU/ml for each of the four types, whereas, the one receiving five doses possessed a higher titer. Since the amount of the toxin handled in laboratory work is usually not so large, three or more doses of the present toxoid will bestow sufficient immunity on the workers participating in botulinum research. Nevertheless booster injections might be desirable to those at higher risk, handling the toxin of a high concentration.     

Intradermal immunization with human diploid cell rabies vaccine: serological and clinical responses of immunized persons to intradermal booster vaccination.

Rabies antibody titers ranged from 0-9.3 IU/mL in 117 human volunteers one year after intradermal vaccination with one or two doses of human diploid cell rabies vaccine (HDCV). At that time, each volunteer received one 0.1-mL booster dose of HDCV intradermally. All 117 volunteers showed good anamnestic responses, with antibody titers rising to 0.5-54.3 IU/mL within seven days of booster injection. Vaccine safety was good; only minor reactions were experienced, all of which resolved spontaneously.     

Bridging non-human primate correlates of protection to reassess the Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed booster schedule in humans

Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed (AVA, BioThrax^®) is approved for use in humans as a priming series of 3 intramuscular (i.m.) injections (0, 1, 6 months; 3-IM) with boosters at 12 and 18 months, and annually thereafter for those at continued risk of infection. A reduction in AVA booster frequency would lessen the burden of vaccination, reduce the cumulative frequency of vaccine associated adverse events and potentially expand vaccine coverage by requiring fewer doses per schedule. Because human inhalation anthrax studies are neither feasible nor ethical, AVA efficacy estimates are determined using cross-species bridging of immune correlates of protection (COP) identified in animal models. We have previously reported that the AVA 3-IM priming series provided high levels of protection in non-human primates (NHP) against inhalation anthrax for up to 4 years after the first vaccination. Penalized logistic regressions of those NHP immunological data identified that anti-protective antigen (anti-PA) IgG concentration measured just prior to infectious challenge was the most accurate single COP.In the present analysis, cross-species logistic regression models of this COP were used to predict probability of survival during a 43 month study in humans receiving the current 3-dose priming and 4 boosters (12, 18, 30 and 42 months; 7-IM) and reduced schedules with boosters at months 18 and 42 only (5-IM), or at month 42 only (4-IM). All models predicted high survival probabilities for the reduced schedules from 7 to 43 months. The predicted survival probabilities for the reduced schedules were 86.8% (4-IM) and 95.8% (5-IM) at month 42 when antibody levels were lowest. The data indicated that 4-IM and 5-IM are both viable alternatives to the current AVA pre-exposure prophylaxis schedule.     

Meningococcal serogroup C immunogenicity,antibody persistence and memory B-cells induced by the monovalent meningococcal serogroup C versus quadrivalent meningococcal serogroup ACWY conjugate booster vaccine: A randomized controlled trial

BackgroundAdolescents are considered the key transmitters of meningococci in the population. Meningococcal serogroup C (MenC) antibody levels wane rapidly after MenC conjugate vaccination in young children, leaving adolescents with low antibody levels. In this study, we compared MenC immune responses after booster vaccination in adolescence with either tetanus toxoid conjugated MenC (MenC-TT) or MenACWY (MenACWY-TT) vaccine, and aimed to establish an optimal age for this booster.MethodsHealthy 10-, 12-, and 15-year-olds, who received a single dose of MenC-TT vaccine in early childhood, were randomized to receive MenC-TT or MenACWY-TT vaccine. MenC serum bactericidal antibody (rSBA) titers, MenC polysaccharide (PS) specific IgG, IgG1 and IgG2 and MenC-specific IgG and IgA memory B-cells were determined before, one month and one year after the booster. Non-inferiority was tested by comparing geometric mean titers (GMTs) between vaccinees at one year.ResultsOf 501 participants, 464 (92.6%) were included in the ‘according to protocol’ cohort analysis. At one month, all participants developed high MenC rSBA titers (>24,000 in all groups) and MenC-PS-specific IgG levels. Non-inferiority was not demonstrated one year after the booster with higher MenC GMTs after the monovalent vaccine, but 462/464 (99.6%) participants maintained protective MenC rSBA titers. IgG levels mainly consisted of IgG1, but similar levels of increase were observed for IgG1 and IgG2. Both vaccines induced a clear increase in the number of circulating MenC-PS specific IgG and IgA memory B-cells. Between one month and one year, the highest antibody decay rate was observed in the 10-year-olds.ConclusionBoth MenC-TT and MenACWY-TT vaccines induced robust protective MenC immune responses after the booster vaccination, although non-inferiority could not be demonstrated for the MenACWY-TT vaccine after one year. Our results underline the importance of optimal timing of a meningococcal booster vaccination to protect against MenC disease in the long-term.     

Analysis of anti-protective antigen IgG subclass distribution in recipients of anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA) and patients with cutaneous and inhalation anthrax

The anti-PA IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4 subclass responses to clinical anthrax and to different numbers of anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA, BioThrax) injections were determined in a cross-sectional study of sera from 63 vaccinees and 13 clinical anthrax patients. The data show that both vaccination with three AVA injections and clinical anthrax elicit anti-PA IgG1, IgG2, and IgG3 subclass responses. An anti-PA IgG4 response was detected in AVA recipients after the fourth injection. The anthrax lethal toxin (LTx) neutralization efficacy of sera from recipients who received 4 to > or =10 AVA injections did not vary significantly in relation to changes in distribution of anti-PA IgG1 and IgG4 subclasses.     

Influence of HCG and tetanus toxoid injections on the antibody titers in a subject immunized with Pr-beta-HCG-TT.

N.D., a subject immunized 11 months earlier with Pr-β-HCG-TT in whom the anti-HCG titers were on the decline, was injected with 2,000 IU and 4,000 IU of HCG intramuscularly at 24-hour intervals. The anti-HCG titers in blood fell in response to HCG administration but remained above zero. No evidence for the presence of free HCG was found in circulation. HCG administration did not alter the anti-tetanus toxoid titers. The anti-HCG titers in the blood sample drawn 21 days after the load test showed a return to nearly about the initial values. No clear cut booster effect of HCG injection on anti-HCG titers was noted. On the other hand injection of tetanus toxoid vaccine increased the antitetanus toxoid antibodies in the subject.     

Anthrax vaccine: immunogenicity and safety of a dose-reduction, route-change comparison study in humans

Anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA), an effective countermeasure against anthrax, is administered as six subcutaneous (SQ) doses over 18 months. To optimize the vaccination schedule and route of administration, we performed a prospective pilot study comparing the use of fewer AVA doses administered intramuscularly (IM) or SQ with the current schedule and route. We enrolled 173 volunteers, randomized to seven groups, who were given AVA once IM or SQ; two doses, 2 or 4 weeks apart, IM or SQ; or six doses at 0, 2, 4 weeks and 6, 12, and 18 months (control group, licensed schedule and route). IM administration of AVA was associated with fewer injection site reactions than SQ administration. Following the first SQ dose of AVA, compared to males, females had a significantly higher rate of injection site reactions such as erythema, induration and subcutaneous nodules (P<0.001). Reaction rates decreased with a longer dose interval between the first two doses. The peak anti-PA IgG antibody response of subjects given two doses of AVA 4 weeks apart IM or SQ was comparable to that seen among subjects who received three doses of AVA at 2-week intervals. The IM route of administering this aluminum hydroxide adsorbed vaccine is safe and has comparable peak anti-PA IgG antibody levels when two doses are administered 4 weeks apart compared to the licensed initial dose schedule of three doses administered 2 weeks apart. A large pivotal study is being planned by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to confirm these results.     

A comparison of multiple regimens of pneumococcal polysaccharide-meningococcal outer membrane protein complex conjugate vaccine and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in toddlers

Children who had been randomized to receive one dose of either heptavalent pneumococcal polysaccharide-meningococcal outer membrane protein complex conjugate vaccine (PCV) or 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PN23) at 12, 15, or 18 months of age were subsequently randomized to receive a booster injection of either PCV or PN23 12 months later. For those children who received a priming dose of PCV (N=75) compared to PN23 (N=48) at 12, 15, or 18 months of age, higher serum antibody concentrations were achieved 1 month following a booster injection of either PCV or PN23 for all serotypes tested (p<0.001). Within the group of children receiving a priming dose of PCV, those children who received a booster dose of PN23 developed higher serum antibody concentrations for four of the seven serotypes tested and similar opsonic antibody titers to serotype 6B, yet more frequent erythema (p=0.030) and pain or soreness (p=0.024) at the injection site compared to those boosted with PCV. In conclusion, a single dose of PCV at 12-18 months of age primed for responses to booster doses of either PCV or PN23 12 months later. For those children who received a priming dose of PCV, boosting with PN23 resulted in more frequent injection site pain and erythema than boosting with PCV, yet higher antibody concentrations for most of the serotypes tested.     

Immunogenicity and Protective Efficacy of Recombinant Protective Antigen Anthrax Vaccine (GC1109) in A/J Mice Model

A recombinant protective antigen anthrax vaccine (GC1109) is being developed as a new-generation vaccine by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. In accordance with the ongoing step 2 of phase II clinical trials, the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of the booster dose of GC1109 were evaluated in A/J mice after 3 serial vaccinations at 4-week intervals. The results indicated that the booster dose significantly increased the production of anti-protective antigen (PA) IgG and toxin-neutralizing antibody (TNA) compared with those of the group without booster. An enhanced protective effect of the booster dose was not observed because the TNA titers of the group without booster were high enough to confer protection against spore challenge. Additionally, the correlation between TNA titers and probability of survival was determined for calculating the threshold TNA titer levels associated with protection. The threshold 50 % neutralization factor (NF₅₀) of TNA showing 70 % probability of protection was 0.21 in A/J mice with 1,200 LD₅₀ Sterne spores challenge. These results indicate that GC1109 is a promising candidate as a new-generation anthrax vaccine and that a booster dose might provide enhanced protection by producing toxin-neutralizing antibodies.     

Prior meningococcal A/C polysaccharide vaccine does not reduce immune responses to conjugate vaccine in young adults

The immune responses induced in young adults by a meningococcal A/C polysaccharide-diphtheria toxoid conjugate vaccine (Mcj) and a meningococcal A/C plain polysaccharide vaccine (Mps) were evaluated in unvaccinated subjects and those who had received either vaccine previously. 195 subjects aged 17-30 years received either Mps or Mcj. After 12 months, they were randomised again to receive a second dose of either vaccine. Serogroup specific serum bactericidal assay (SBA) titers and IgG antibody responses were assayed before and 4-8 weeks after primary and booster immunisation. Both vaccines were immunogenic in previously unvaccinated subjects. Administration of a dose of Mps after previous Mps or Mcj induced lower bactericidal titers to group C Neisseria meningitidis than those seen after a single dose of Mps. Bactericidal antibody responses to Mcj were not reduced in subjects who had previously received Mps.     

Use of a booster dose of capsular group C meningococcal glycoconjugate vaccine to demonstrate immunologic memory in children primed with one or two vaccine doses in infancy

BackgroundUse of a polysaccharide vaccine challenge to demonstrate immunologic memory after priming with capsular group C meningococcal conjugate vaccines (MenCC) risks induction of immunologic hyporesponsiveness. For this reason, MenCC vaccines are now used as probes of immunologic memory, however, no studies have demonstrated their ability to distinguish primed from unprimed children.MethodsThis study was part of a randomised controlled trial investigating the immunogenicity of a booster dose of the combined Haemophilus influenzae type b and MenC-tetanus toxoid vaccine (Hib-MenC-TT) in infants receiving reduced dose MenCC vaccine priming schedules (one MenC-CRM/MenC-TT or two MenC-CRM vaccine doses) compared with an unprimed group. Antibody kinetics were studied in a subset of 269 children by measuring changes in the MenC serum bactericidal antibody, using rabbit complement, (MenC rSBA) titres and MenC specific IgG memory B-cells before and at 6 and 28 days following the 12 month booster vaccination.ResultsAt 6 days after the 12 month MenCC vaccine, the rise in MenC rSBA titres and MenC specific IgG memory B-cells of the primed groups were significantly higher than the infant MenCC naïve group. Participants primed with one MenC-TT dose had the highest increase in MenC rSBA titres compared with all other groups. The MenC rSBA titres at the 28th compared with the 6th day after boosting was significantly higher in those primed with a single MenC-TT/MenC-CRM vaccine in infancy compared with those who were not primed or who were primed with two doses of the MenC-CRM vaccine.ConclusionImmunologic memory can be demonstrated by a MenCC booster vaccination but is affected by the type and number of MenCC doses used for infant priming. The MenC rSBA responses can be used to demonstrate successful immunologic priming.     

A mucosal vaccine against diphtheria: formulation of cross reacting material (CRM(197)) of diphtheria toxin with chitosan enhances local and systemic antibody and Th2 responses following nasal delivery

The development of new generation vaccines against diphtheria is dependent on the identification of antigens and routes of immunization that are capable of stimulating immune responses similar to, or greater than, those obtained with the parenterally-delivered toxoid vaccine, while reducing the adverse effects that have been associated with the traditional vaccine. In this study, we examined the cellular and humoral immune responses in mice generated after both parenteral and mucosal immunizations with cross-reacting material (CRM(197)) of diphtheria toxin. We found that both native and mildly formaldehyde-treated CRM(197) and conventional diphtheria toxoid (DT) induced mixed Th1/Th2 responses and similar levels of anti-DT serum IgG following parenteral immunization. In contrast, CRM(197) preparations were poorly immunogenic when administered intranasally in solution. However, formulation of the antigens with chitosan significantly enhanced their immunogenicity, inducing high levels of antigen-specific IgG, secretory IgA, toxin-neutralizing antibodies and T cell responses, predominately of Th2 subtype. Furthermore, intranasal immunization with CRM(197) and chitosan induced protective antibodies against the toxin in a guinea pig passive challenge model. We also found that priming parenterally with DT in alum and boosting intranasally with CRM(197) was a very effective method of immunization in mice, capable of inducing high levels of anti-DT IgG and neutralizing antibodies in the serum and secretory IgA in the respiratory tract. Our findings suggest that boosting intranasally with CRM(197) antigen may be very effective in adolescents or adults who have previously been parenterally immunized with a conventional diphtheria toxoid vaccine.     

The effect of reconstitution of an Haemophilus influenzae type b-tentanus toxoid conjugate (PRP-T) vaccine on the immune responses to a diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis (DTwP) vaccine: a five-year follow-up.

Controversial results have been obtained from previous studies on the combined administration of Haemophilus influenzae type b-tetanus toxoid conjugate (PRP-T) and diphtheria-tetanus-whole-cell pertussis (DTwP) combination vaccines, with regard to possible reciprocal interference between the constituent antigens. To document the priming effect and possible long-term immunogenic interference of PRP-T and DTwP combination vaccines, a randomized, double-blind, controlled study was conducted in Belgium. A total of 168 healthy infants received, at 3, 4 and 5 months of age, DTwP vaccine mixed just prior to injection either with PRP-T vaccine (group A, DTwP//PRP-T, N = 85) or with placebo (group B, DTwP//Placebo, N = 83). At the age of 14 months, children of both groups were randomized to receive either a dose of DTwP//PRP-T vaccine (subgroups A1 and B1) or a dose of Hib polysaccharide (PRP) vaccine (subgroups A2 and B2). Those children in subgroups A1 and B1 had an additional serum sample taken at the age of 5 years (at the time of a DT booster). The immune response to Hib polysaccharide at the age of 4, 5 and 6 months confirmed the excellent immunogenicity profile of PRP-T in infants. In addition, the vigorous anamnestic response (i.e. a 20-fold increase of GMT) to a booster dose of the plain capsular polysaccharide (PRP) reflected the efficient Hib-priming induced by the combined DTwP//PRP-T vaccine. Reconstitution of PRP-T with DTwP did not affect the immune response to diphtheria toxoid or pertussis agglutinins. Nevertheless, at almost any time point during the five-year follow-up, the tetanus antitoxin GMT values were significantly lower in the DTwP//PRP-T group (A and A1) than in the DTwP//Placebo group (B and B1). Despite the suppressive effect on GMT values, intergroup differences in rates of seroprotection were never significant, except after doses 2 and 3 for which there were lower percentages of children in group A with antitoxin titers > 0.05 IU/mL and > 1.0 IU/mL. In the group primed with the combined DTwP//PRP-T vaccine, (1) a DT booster dose at the age of 5 years provoked a 150-fold increase in tetanus antitoxin GMT, (2) a high tetanus antitoxin GMT value was attained (GMT = 19.3 IU/mL) and (3) all children in this group had tetanus antitoxin titers > 1.0 IU/mL, so it may be concluded that all these children will still be protected against tetanus until at least the age of the next recommended booster dose (i.e. the age of 15 years). No differences in the occurrence of adverse events were observed between the groups who received the DTwP//PRP-T vaccine or the DTwP//Placebo vaccine, both vaccines being associated with events customarily attributable to DTwP (data not shown). Our results indicate (1) that the combination vaccine, DTwP//PRP-T, represents a safe and effective alternative for the existing uncombined vaccines and (2) that the long-term effect of interference between the components of future combination vaccines should be studied with subsequent booster doses, followed by the evaluation of persistence of antibodies over several years.     

Booster immunization with a hexavalent diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, inactivated poliovirus vaccine and Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate combination vaccine in the second year of life: safety, immunogenicity and persistence of antibody responses

The immunogenicity and reactogenicity of booster vaccination with GSK Biologicals' hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine was assessed in toddlers aged 12-18 months previously primed with the same combination (N=341), or with DTPa-IPV/Hib and HBV administered separately (N=102; Trials 217744/059 and 217744/096). Antibody persistence at age 4-6 years was also assessed in children who had received a 4th consecutive dose of DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine or separate DTPa-IPV/Hib and HBV vaccines in this study and in another study conducted under similar conditions in Germany. Prior to booster vaccination in the second year of life, antibody concentrations and seroprotection rates were similar irrespective of the primary vaccine used. One month after boosting with DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib, substantial antibody increases were observed against all vaccine antigens indicative of previous immune priming. Seropositivity and booster response rates against all antigens were 97.4-100%. Reactogenicity following booster vaccination with DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib was similar regardless of the primary regimen used. Three to four years after administration of the 4th DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib dose, >90% vaccinees had persistent protective antibody concentrations against diphtheria, hepatitis B, Hib and the three poliovirus types. Anti-tetanus antibody concentrations were > or = 0.1 IU/ml in 76.4% subjects and seropositivity for pertussis antibodies ranged from 34.5% for PT to 98.9% for FHA. In conclusion, the combined hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine is immunogenic and safe when used for boosting in the second year of life, regardless of the primary vaccine used, and offers sustained protection during early childhood and beyond.     

Anthrax vaccine adsorbed: Further evidence supporting continuing the vaccination series rather than restarting the series when doses are delayed

Whether to restart or continue the series when anthrax vaccine doses are missed is a frequent medical management problem. We applied the noninferiority analysis model to this prospective study comparing the Bacillus anthracis protective antigen (PA) IgG antibody response and lethal toxin neutralization activity at day 28 to the anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA) (Biothrax^®) administered on schedule or delayed. A total of 600 volunteers were enrolled: 354 in the on-schedule cohort; 246 in the delayed cohort. Differences were noted in immune responses between cohorts (p < 0.0001) and among the racial categories (p < 0.0001). Controlling for covariates, the delayed cohort was non-inferior to the on-schedule cohort for the rate of 4-fold rise in both anti-PA IgG concentration (p < 0.0001) and TNA ED₅₀ titers (p < 0.0001); as well as the mean log₁₀-transformed anti-PA IgG concentration (p < 0.0001) and the mean log₁₀-transformed TNA ED₅₀ titers (p < 0.0001). Providing a missed AVA dose after a delay as long as 5–7 years, elicits anti-PA IgG antibody and TNA ED₅₀ responses that are robust and non-inferior to the responses observed when the 6-month dose is given on-schedule. These important data suggest it is not necessary to restart the series when doses of the anthrax vaccine are delayed as long as 5 or more years.     

Interchangeability of two diphtheria and tetanus toxoids, acellular pertussis, inactivated poliovirus, Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccines as a fourth dose in 15-20-month-old toddlers

BACKGROUND: Since 1998, all children in Canada have been immunized with a pentavalent diphtheria and tetanus toxoids, acellular pertussis, inactivated poliovirus, Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine (DTaP-IPV-Hib) produced by one manufacturer (Pentacel). Recently, another DTaP-IPV-Hib (Infanrix-IPV-Hib) became available. Data on the interchangeability of these products was lacking. METHODS: In this multicentered, observer-blind study, healthy 15-20-month-old children previously immunized with three doses of Pentacel were randomly allocated to receive a single dose of Pentacel or Infanrix-IPV-Hib. Adverse events were documented by diary for 7 days post-immunization and unsolicited adverse events were documented for 30 days. RESULTS: 433 participants were enrolled (mean age 17.1 months). Rates of fever, anorexia and irritability were similar in both groups. Injection-site redness >20 mm (11.5% versus 5.6%; p = 0.038), injection-site pain (52.1% versus 39.4%; p = 0.009) and moderate or greater drowsiness (13.8% versus 7.4%; p = 0.042) were more common after Pentacel than Infanrix-IPV-Hib. The proportions of participants who were sero-protected or who sero-responded were similar for all antigens. Geometric mean titers or concentrations were similar for antibodies against diphtheria toxoid and poliovirus type 3. Geometric mean concentrations or titers were higher in the Infanrix-IPV-Hib group against pertussis toxin (88.5 EU/mL versus 65.6 EU/mL), filamentous hemagglutinin (207.3 EU/mL versus 132.1 EU/mL), pertactin (251.9 EU/mL versus 166.9 EU/mL) and poliovirus type 1 (1293.7 versus 976.2 reciprocal dilution). Geometric mean titers or concentrations were higher in the Pentacel group against H. influenzae type b (29 microg/mL versus 19 microg/mL), tetanus toxoid (5.6 IU/mL versus 4.7 IU/mL) and poliovirus type 2 (1437.3 versus 1134.2 reciprocal dilution). CONCLUSIONS: A booster dose of Infanrix-IPV-Hib after three priming doses of Pentacel is well-tolerated and immunogenic in 15-20-month-old toddlers and can be used interchangeably.     

Rabies vaccination: comparison of neutralizing antibody responses after priming and boosting with different combinations of DNA, inactivated virus, or recombinant vaccinia virus vaccines

Long-term levels of neutralizing antibody were evaluated in mice after a single immunization with experimental DNA or recombinant vaccinia virus (RVV) vaccines encoding the rabies virus glycoprotein (G), or the commercially available inactivated virus human diploid cell vaccine (HDCV). Anamnestic antibody titers were also evaluated after two booster immunizations with vaccines that were identical to or different from the priming vaccine. Five hundred and forty days (1.5 year) after a single immunization with any of the three vaccines, neutralizing antibody titers remained greater than the minimal acceptable human level of antibody titer (0.5 International Units (IU)/ml). In addition, either an HDCV or DNA booster elicited early and elevated anamnestic antibody responses in mice that had been primed with any of the three vaccines. In contrast, RVV boosters failed to elevate titers in mice that had been previously primed with RVV, and elicited slowly rising titers in mice that had been primed with either DNA or HDCV. Thus, a single vaccination with any of the three different vaccines elicited long-term levels of neutralizing antibody that exceeded 0.5 IU/ml. In contrast, different prime-booster vaccine combinations elicited anamnestic neutralizing antibody responses that increased quickly, increased slowly or failed to increase.     

The immunogenicity in humans of a botulinum type F vaccine

A purified monovalent botulinum type F toxoid vaccine was administered to 35 healthy adult volunteers in a phase I clinical trial. Serum samples from the vaccinated volunteers were evaluated for an antibody response at various time intervals over 1 year by mouse bioassay and ELISA. The antibody response was measured for varying doses of vaccine (2, 5, or 10 μg), and after single or multiple (two or three doses @ 10 μg) vaccinations. Six out of 15 (40%) individuals developed antibody titers after receiving a single dose. After two and three vaccinations, there was a 90% (18/20) and 100% (10/10) seroconversion rate, respectively. Eight months after initial injection, 57 and 63% of individuals were antibody positive following two or three vaccinations, respectively. Single vaccinations, at any of the tested dosages, elicited lower, if any, antibody response than did multiple vaccinations. After the third vaccination, ELISA titers positively correlated with mouse neutralization bioassay titers (r²=0.86).