Treatment of experimental endocarditis caused by a beta-lactamase-producing strain of Enterococcus faecalis with high-level resistance to gentamicin.

Several antimicrobial regimens were evaluated in the treatment of experimental enterococcal endocarditis due to a beta-lactamase-producing, highly gentamicin-resistant strain of Enterococcus faecalis. Ampicillin alone cleared bacteremia in the majority of rats and reduced titers of bacteria within vegetations (6.84 versus 8.80 log10 CFU/g in controls) but did not sterilize valves. Ampicillin-sulbactam combinations, vancomycin, daptomycin, and imipenem each reduced residual bacterial titers within vegetations to 4.01 log10 CFU/g or less; in 26 to 43% of animals receiving 5 days of therapy, titers of bacteria were reduced to undetectable levels. In a separate experiment, rats received ampicillin-sulbactam, daptomycin, or vancomycin for 10 days and were then observed for 10 days after termination of therapy for evidence of relapse. In surviving rats, valves remained sterile in four of five rats treated with ampicillin-sulbactam, in five of seven treated with daptomycin, but in only one of eight receiving vancomycin.     

Effective treatment of cephalosporin-rifampin combinations against cryptic methicillin-resistant beta-lactamase-producing coagulase-negative staphylococcal experimental endocarditis.

The efficacy of cefazolin or cefpirome alone or combined with rifampin was compared with that of vancomycin alone or combined with rifampin in an experimental model of methicillin-resistant, beta-lactamase-producing, coagulase-negative staphylococcal endocarditis. Phenotypically, the mecA gene-positive strain used in vivo did not exhibit methicillin resistance by the agar dilution or disk susceptibility method but was resistant in vitro (oxacillin MIC, 64 micrograms/ml) by the microtiter dilution method with 2% NaCl supplementation. Macrodilution broth susceptibilities of standard inocula failed to demonstrate cross-resistance of staphylococci to cefazolin (MIC, 8 micrograms/ml) or cefpirome (MIC, 4 micrograms/ml). In vivo, vancomycin and cefpirome had similar activities, and both regimens were more effective than was cefazolin alone. While the MIC of rifampin was low (0.031 micrograms/ml), monotherapy with rifampin resulted in a bimodal distribution of outcomes due to the expected emergence of resistant mutants. The results in vitro of time-kill synergy studies using rifampin in combination with cefazolin or cefpirome varied with the antimicrobial concentrations tested and did not reliably predict activities in vivo of rifampin-beta-lactam combination therapies. Cefpirome, but not cefazolin or vancomycin, in combination with rifampin was synergistic in vivo. Cefpirome in combination with rifampin was more effective than was cefazolin in combination with rifampin. Both cephalosporin-rifampin regimens were significantly more effective than was cephalosporin or vancomycin monotherapy and were as effective as vancomycin combined with rifampin. These data support further evaluation of rifampin-beta-lactam combinations as possible alternative therapies to vancomycin-containing regimens for selected methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococcal infections.     

Role of tolerance in treatment and prophylaxis of experimental Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis with vancomycin, teicoplanin, and daptomycin.

The role of Staphylococcus aureus tolerance in the treatment and prophylaxis of endocarditis in rats was investigated. The efficacies of vancomycin, teicoplanin, and daptomycin, alone and in combination with rifampin, were compared in rats with endocarditis infected with a tolerant strain of S. aureus and in rats with endocarditis infected with its nontolerant variant. In vitro the cloxacillin-tolerant strain was also tolerant to vancomycin and teicoplanin, but not to daptomycin. However, tolerance to these antibiotics did not influence the results of treatment of experimental S. aureus endocarditis. There was no difference in the bacterial densities in the vegetations of rats infected with either the tolerant or the nontolerant strain after 5 days of treatment with any of the antibiotic regimens. Of all antibiotics, daptomycin was the most effective in reducing bacterial numbers in vegetations. Combination of rifampin with vancomycin or teicoplanin improved the results of treatment for the tolerant as well as the nontolerant strains. Daptomycin was as effective alone as in combination with rifampin. In contrast, tolerance influenced the prophylactic effects of vancomycin and teicoplanin. The proportion of rats with sterile vegetations after prophylaxis with vancomycin or teicoplanin at a low dose was lower for those infected with the tolerant strain than for those infected with the nontolerant strain. A low dose of daptomycin was equally effective against the tolerant and the nontolerant strains. However, higher doses of all three antibiotics afforded almost full protection against both strains.     

Comparison of ampicillin-sulbactam with vancomycin for treatment of experimental endocarditis due to a beta-lactamase-producing, highly gentamicin-resistant isolate of Enterococcus faecalis.

Increasing antibiotic resistance in the enterococci, including the capacity for beta-lactamase production and the development of high-level aminoglycoside resistance, has complicated the treatment of serious enterococcal infections, which often require synergistic antibiotic combinations for cure. We utilized the rabbit model of aortic valve endocarditis to investigate the effects of various antibiotics, alone and in combination, against a multiply antibiotic-resistant isolate of Enterococcus faecalis. Female New Zealand White rabbits were infected with either a beta-lactamase-producing, gentamicin-resistant isolate of E. faecalis or a non-beta-lactamase-producing, aminoglycoside-susceptible isolate, and the mean log10 CFU per gram of vegetation were determined. The most active agents were low-dose ampicillin-sulbactam (200 mg/kg of body weight per day), high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam (400 mg/kg of body weight per day), and vancomycin (150 mg/kg of body weight per day), which reduced the titers of bacteria by 2.27, 2.76, and 2.85 log10 (CFU/g, respectively, compared with controls. While ampicillin-sulbactam and vancomycin were equally efficacious in reducing titers of bacteria in vegetations, no animals were cured (defined as < 2 log10 CFU/g of vegetation) by either agent, whether treatment was continued for 3 or 7 days. The addition of gentamicin was not associated with increased killing in rabbits infected with the aminoglycoside-resistant isolate. Both high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam and vancomycin regimens demonstrated significant, continued reduction in bacterial titers with the longer periods of treatment (P < or = 0.05); 7-day treatment with high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam produced a greater reduction in bacterial titers in vegetation than 7-day treatment with vancomycin (P < or = 0.05). We conclude that ampicillin-sulbactam and vancomycin are equally effective in the treatment of experimental endocarditis due to beta-lactamase-producing, highly gentamicin-resistant E. faecalis. The optimum therapy for such infections in humans is not known.     

Chemoprophylactic efficacy against experimental endocarditis caused by beta-lactamase-producing, aminoglycoside-resistant enterococci is associated with prolonged serum inhibitory activity.

We studied the prevention of experimental aortic endocarditis caused by a beta-lactamase-producing, aminoglycoside-resistant strain of Enterococcus faecalis (HH22) in 146 catheterized rabbits. Both vancomycin and ampicillin-sulbactam readily killed this resistant enterococcus strain in vitro. At a challenge inoculum of approximately 10(9) CFU, vancomycin (40 mg/kg intravenously [i.v.]), ampicillin (40 mg/kg i.v.), or a combination of ampicillin plus a beta-lactamase inhibitor, sulbactam (20 mg/kg, i.v.), did not prevent the development of endocarditis in any of the animals, although mean intravegetation bacterial densities were significantly lower in animals that received vancomycin than they were in animals that received other therapies (P less than 0.001). At a challenge inoculum of 10(6) CFU, vancomycin was 100% effective in preventing enterococcal endocarditis compared with ampicillin (29%; P less than 0.00001) and ampicillin-sulbactam (65%; P less than 0.01). Factors associated with the superior prophylactic efficacy of vancomycin in this model included prolonged serum inhibitory activity and time above MICs. Factors not associated with the antienterococcal prophylactic efficacy of vancomycin included the duration of the in vitro postantibiotic effect of the drug and the magnitude of the ability of this drug to enhance enterococcal in vitro opsonophagocytic killing by polymorphonuclear leukocytes. The superior prophylactic efficacy of vancomycin in this endocarditis model related to the superior pharmacokinetic profile of the drug when it was given intermittently at dose intervals of every 6 h.     

Evaluation of bactericidal activities of LY333328, vancomycin, teicoplanin, ampicillin-sulbactam, trovafloxacin, and RP59500 alone or in combination with rifampin or gentamicin against different strains of vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus by time-kill curve methods

This in vitro study evaluated the activities of vancomycin, LY333328, and teicoplanin alone and in combination with gentamicin, rifampin, and RP59500 against Staphylococcus aureus isolates with intermediate susceptibilities to vancomycin. Ampicillin-sulbactam and trovafloxacin were also evaluated. LY333328 and ampicillin-sulbactam resulted in bactericidal activity against all isolates. The combination of gentamicin with glycopeptides showed synergistic activity, while rifampin had no added benefit.     

Efficacy of Trovafloxacin, a New Quinolone Antibiotic, in Experimental Staphylococcal Endocarditis Due to Oxacillin-Resistant Strains

Therapeutic options for severe infections caused by strains of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ORSA) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (ORSE) are very limited. With the increasing resistance of such strains to aminoglycosides, rifampin, and currently available quinolone agents, as well as the recent documentation of increasing resistance of ORSA to vancomycin (VANCO), new treatment alternatives are imperative. The in vivo efficacy of trovafloxacin (TROVA), a new quinolone agent with excellent antistaphylococcal activity in vitro, against experimental endocarditis (IE) due to β-lactamase-producing ORSA and ORSE strains (ORSA and ORSE IE) was evaluated. TROVA (25 mg/kg of body weight intravenously [i.v.] twice daily [b.i.d.]) was compared to VANCO (20 mg/kg i.v. b.i.d.) and two regimens of ampicillin-sulbactam (AMP-SUL; 200 mg/kg intramuscularly [i.m.] three times a day [t.i.d.] and 20 mg/kg i.m. b.i.d.), with all agents given for 3 or 6 days. AMP-SUL was included as a comparative treatment regimen because of its proven efficacy against experimental ORSA and ORSE IE. For both ORSA and ORSE IE, TROVA, AMP-SUL, and VANCO each reduced staphylococcal densities in vegetations compared to untreated controls (P < 0.01). For ORSA IE, TROVA was the most rapidly bactericidal agent—although not to a statistically significant degree—correlating with its superior bactericidal effect in vitro compared to those of VANCO and AMP-SUL.     

Vancomycin or vancomycin plus netilmicin for methicillin- and gentamicin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus aortic valve experimental endocarditis.

Using a rabbit model of aortic valve endocarditis, we studied the efficacy of vancomycin alone or in combination with netilmicin and/or rifampin against a methicillin- and gentamicin-resistant strain of Staphylococcus aureus (MGRSA). Antibiotics were given for 6 to 12 days, as follows: vancomycin (15 mg/kg of body weight every 12 h [BID] intravenously), vancomycin plus netilmicin (2.5 mg/kg BID intramuscularly), vancomycin plus rifampin (10 mg/kg BID intramuscularly), and vancomycin plus netilmicin plus rifampin at the same routes, dosages, and schedules mentioned above. Netilmicin was given to two additional groups at a higher dosage (6 mg/kg every 24 h intramuscularly) alone or in combination with vancomycin (15 mg/kg BID intravenously) for 12 days. All regimens resulted in undetectable bacterial counts in a significant proportion of vegetations (except netilmicin alone) or reduced the bacterial counts in the vegetations compared with the counts in the untreated controls (P<0.01 to P<0.001). No resistance to rifampin or netilmicin developed during therapy. It is concluded that in the treatment of experimental aortic valve endocarditis caused by MGRSA (i) vancomycin as monotherapy is as efficacious as the triple combination, (ii) the addition of netilmicin (once daily or BID) to vancomycin does not improve the efficacy of the latter antibiotic, even in the presence of rifampin, and (iii) a 12-day course in more effective than a 6-day one, but not at a statistically significant level.     

Pharmacodynamics of once- or twice-daily levofloxacin versus vancomycin, with or without rifampin, against Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro model with infected platelet-fibrin clots.

We compared the pharmacodynamic activities of levofloxacin versus vancomycin, with or without rifampin, in an in vitro model with infected platelet-fibrin clots simulating vegetations. Infected platelet-fibrin clots were prepared with human cryoprecipitate, human platelets, calcium, thrombin, and approximately 10(9) CFU of organisms (MSSA 1199 and MRSA 494) per g and then were suspended via monofilament line into the in vitro model containing Mueller-Hinton growth medium. Antibiotics were administered by bolus injection into the model to simulate human pharmacokinetics; the regimens simulated included levofloxacin at dosages of 800 mg every 24 h (q24h) and 400 mg q12h, vancomycin at 1 g q12h, and rifampin at 600 mg q24h. Each model was run in duplicate over a 72-h period. Infected platelet-fibrin clots were removed in duplicate from each model, weighed, homogenized, serially diluted with sterile 0.9% saline, and plated on tryptic soy agar plates and plates containing antibiotics at 3, 6, and 12 times the MIC to evaluate the emergence of resistance. Time-kill curves were constructed by plotting the inoculum size versus time. Residual inoculum at 72 h was used to compare regimens. All levofloxacin regimens were significantly better than vancomycin monotherapy against both isolates (P < 0.002). Against MSSA 1199, levofloxacin q24h was significantly better than all other regimens, including levofloxacin q12h (P < 0.002); however, no difference between the levofloxacin monotherapy and combination therapy (with rifampin) regimens against MRSA 494 was seen. Killing activity for levofloxacin appeared to correlate better with the peak/MIC ratio than with the area under the curve/MIC ratio. The addition of rifampin significantly enhanced the activity of vancomycin but had little effect upon the activity of levofloxacin. For MRSA 494, vancomycin plus rifampin resulted in the greatest killing (P < 0.05). Development of resistance was not detected with any regimen. Levofloxacin may be a useful therapeutic alternative in the treatment of staphylococcal endocarditis, and further study with animal models of endocarditis or clinical trials are warranted.     

Efficacy of ciprofloxacin for experimental endocarditis caused by methicillin-susceptible or -resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus.

The efficacy of ciprofloxacin for experimental aortic valve endocarditis in rabbits infected by either a methicillin-susceptible or a methicillin-resistant strain of Staphylococcus aureus was compared with standard therapy of nafcillin or vancomycin, respectively. After 4 days of therapy, ciprofloxacin reduced the counts of organisms in aortic valve vegetations as effectively as the standard regimen for both susceptible and resistant strains. Mean concentrations of ciprofloxacin in serum achieved 1 h after a dose exceeded the MBC for each strain by twofold or less. In these experiments ciprofloxacin was as efficacious as standard regimens currently used to treat staphylococcal infections in humans.     

Beta-Lactam-beta-lactamase-inhibitor combinations are active in experimental endocarditis caused by beta-lactamase-producing oxacillin-resistant staphylococci.

Optimal therapeutic strategies for serious infections caused by borderline and heterotypic oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (BORSA and ORSA) strains have not been fully characterized. Recent evidence suggests that the dominant penicillin-binding protein of ORSA strains (PBP 2a) shows good affinity for ampicillin and that these strains commonly produce beta-lactamase. Therefore, we compared the in vivo efficacy of the combination of ampicillin plus sulbactam with that of vancomycin against ORSA strains. Also, the moderate resistance of BORSA strains appears to be attributable mainly to the hyperproduction of beta-lactamase. Therefore, we also studied the in vivo efficacy of ampicillin plus sulbactam against such organisms. Experimental aortic endocarditis was induced in rabbits by the following three strains: beta-lactamase-producing BORSA strain VP-986, beta-lactamase-producing ORSA strain 67-0, and its beta-lactamase-negative clone. In animals with BORSA endocarditis, ampicillin plus sulbactam and oxacillin were highly effective in reducing mean intravegetation bacterial densities, with each being significantly better than either ampicillin alone or no therapy. In animals with endocarditis caused by the beta-lactamase-producing ORSA strain, ampicillin plus sulbactam was significantly better at reducing mean vegetation bacterial densities than the other regimens. For endocarditis caused by the beta-lactamase-negative ORSA clone, ampicillin was better than vancomycin in reducing mean intravegetation bacterial densities. These data show that infections caused by beta-lactamase-producing BORSA strains respond therapeutically in a manner similar to that of infections caused by oxacillin-susceptible strains, with both oxacillin and ampicillin plus sulbactam being highly efficacious. Moreover, high-dose ampicillin treatment strategies were effective in the therapy of ORSA endocarditis; this efficacy is presumably related to the relatively high affinity profile of this compound (compare with that of oxacillin) for the functionally dominant ORSA PBP 2a.     

Efficacy of Telavancin in a rabbit model of aortic valve endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus

The activities of telavancin and vancomycin were compared in vitro and in the rabbit model of aortic valve endocarditis against a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain, COL, and a vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) strain, HIP 5836. Telavancin was bactericidal in time-kill studies at a concentration of 5 microg/ml against both COL and HIP5836. Vancomycin was bacteriostatic at 5 microg/ml and bactericidal at 10 microg/ml against COL and was bacteriostatic at 10 microg/ml against VISA strain HIP 5836. Compared to untreated controls, a twice-daily regimen of 30 mg/kg of telavancin reduced mean aortic valve vegetation titers of the COL strain by 4.7 log(10) CFU/g after 4 days of therapy and sterilized 6/11 vegetations compared to 3.4 log(10) CFU/g with 3/10 vegetations sterilized for a regimen of twice-daily vancomycin, 30 mg/kg; these differences were not statistically significant. Telavancin was significantly more effective than vancomycin in the VISA model, producing a 5.5 log(10) CFU/g reduction versus no reduction in CFU with vancomycin. In experiments comparing 2-day regimens of telavancin at 30 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg twice daily, organisms were rapidly eliminated from vegetations, but the effect was not different between the two doses. These results suggest that telavancin may be an effective treatment for endocarditis and other serious staphylococcal infections accompanied by bacteremia, including infections caused by staphylococci not susceptible to vancomycin.     

Activities of trovafloxacin and ampicillin-sulbactam alone or in combination versus three strains of vancomycin- intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic infection model

The recent isolation of clinical strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with intermediate susceptibility (MICs, 8 microg/ml) to vancomycin (vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus [VISA]) emphasizes the importance of developing novel antimicrobial regimens and/or agents for future treatment. We studied the activities of ampicillin-sulbactam and trovafloxacin alone or in combination against three unique strains of VISA in an in vitro infection model. Two VISA strains were trovafloxacin susceptible (MICs, < or =2 microg/ml); one VISA strain was trovafloxacin resistant (MIC, 4 microg/ml). Trovafloxacin was administered to simulate a dose of 200 or 400 mg every 24 h. Ampicillin-sulbactam was administered to simulate a dose of 3 g every 6 h. Samples were removed from the infection models over 48 h, and reductions in colony counts were compared between regimens. Trovafloxacin (200 mg) produced rapid killing of a control MRSA strain over the 48-h experiment but produced only slight killing of all three VISA strains. The higher dose of trovafloxacin improved killing but did not produce bactericidal activity at 48 h. Ampicillin-sulbactam produced rapid bactericidal activity against all four strains tested, and colony counts at 8 h were at the limits of detection. However, regrowth occurred by 48 h for each strain. The combination of ampicillin-sulbactam and trovafloxacin provided additive activity against two of the three VISA strains. In conclusion, trovafloxacin or ampicillin-sulbactam alone did not provide adequate activity against the VISA strains for the 48-h evaluation period, but the combination could help improve activity against some strains of VISA.     

Efficacy of oxacillin and ampicillin-sulbactam combination in experimental endocarditis caused by beta-lactamase-hyperproducing Staphylococcus aureus.

Optimal therapy of infections caused by borderline oxacillin-susceptible, beta-lactamase-hyperproducing Staphylococcus aureus has not been established. We used a rat model of aortic valve endocarditis to examine efficacies of antibiotic regimens against a borderline oxacillin-susceptible strain as compared with a fully susceptible S. aureus strain. Animals were treated with oxacillin alone or in combination with sulbactam or with ampicillin-sulbactam combinations at two dose levels. Infections caused by the borderline susceptible and fully susceptible strains responded equally well to oxacillin alone, with residual bacterial titers in vegetations falling to 4.8 +/- 1.6 and 4.4 +/- 1.7 (mean +/- standard deviation) log10 CFU/g, respectively. Addition of sulbactam to oxacillin (1:2) did not enhance the efficacy of oxacillin against either strain in the animal model. A high-dose regimen of ampicillin-sulbactam (2:1) yielding mean (+/- standard deviation) levels in serum of 16.8 +/- 7.4 and 9.5 +/- 1.1 micrograms/ml, respectively, proved equally effective against both strains (bacterial titers, 6.6 log10 CFU/g). However, at lower doses (8.3 +/- 2.6 and 5.9 +/- 2.4 micrograms/ml, the combination showed greater efficacy against the fully susceptible strain, with residual titers of 7.1 +/- 2.0 versus 9.0 +/- 1.6 log10 CFU/g (P less than 0.05). In vitro studies revealed that the beta-lactamase inhibitor sulbactam was also a potent inducer of staphylococcal beta-lactamase at clinically relevant concentrations. Based on this short-term in vivo therapy study, oxacillin would be predicted to be clinically effective in the therapy of infections caused by borderline oxacillin-susceptible strains of S. aureus, while the combination of ampicillin with sulbactam appears to be inferior to oxacillin alone against such infections.     

Teicoplanin versus nafcillin and vancomycin in the treatment of experimental endocarditis caused by methicillin-susceptible or -resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

In rabbits with experimentally induced endocarditis, the efficacy of teicoplanin compared favorably both with that of nafcillin for infection by a methicillin-susceptible strain of Staphylococcus aureus and with that of vancomycin for infection by a methicillin-resistant strain of S. aureus. In a 4-day treatment regimen, teicoplanin was as effective as either nafcillin or vancomycin in eliminating organisms from aortic valve vegetations in the respective infection. In a 10-day regimen for methicillin-resistant S. aureus endocarditis, both teicoplanin and vancomycin sterilized the vegetations of some rabbits, but the relapse rate was high for both. These results justify further investigation into the role of teicoplanin for the treatment of serious infections caused by S. aureus.     

Treatment of Experimental Staphylococcal Endocarditis Due to a Strain with Reduced Susceptibility In Vitro to Vancomycin: Efficacy of Ampicillin-Sulbactam

We evaluated several 3-day antimicrobial regimens in the treatment of experimental endocarditis caused by an oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain exhibiting intermediate susceptibility in vitro to vancomycin (VISA). Neither vancomycin alone nor trovafloxacin exhibited in vivo efficacy; addition of amikacin to vancomycin yielded a modest in vivo effect. In contrast, the combination of ampicillin and sulbactam was highly effective in vivo, causing a mean decrease in VISA vegetation densities of >5 log(10) CFU/g versus those of untreated controls.     

Efficacy of teicoplanin in two dosage regimens for experimental endocarditis caused by a beta-lactamase-producing strain of Enterococcus faecalis with high-level resistance to gentamicin.

Optimal therapy for the treatment of infections caused by strains of enterococci demonstrating high-level resistance to gentamicin and other aminoglycosides has not been established. The present study examined the efficacy of teicoplanin, a glycopeptide antibiotic active against gram-positive bacterial infections in various animal models, in the treatment of experimental endocarditis due to a beta-lactamase-producing strain of Enterococcus faecalis with high-level resistance to gentamicin. Vancomycin was used as a comparative antibiotic. In the first set of experiments, both antimicrobial agents were administered by continuous intravenous infusion for 5 days at dosages which yielded comparable mean levels in serum (plus or minus the standard deviation) of 14.6 +/- 4.3 micrograms/ml for teicoplanin and 14.3 +/- 2.2 micrograms/ml for vancomycin. These regimens proved similarly effective in sterilizing cardiac vegetations (38 versus 50% of treated animals, respectively; P greater than 0.05). Mean (plus or minus the standard deviation) residual bacterial titers within vegetations were reduced to 3.2 +/- 1.2 log10 CFU/g and 3.4 +/- 1.7 log10 CFU/g, respectively. In separate experiments, the potential of teicoplanin to cure endocarditis was assessed, using two dosage regimens: (i) 30 mg/kg per day (mean level in serum, 13 micrograms/ml) for 10 days or (ii) 150 mg/kg per day (mean level in serum, 84 micrograms/ml) for 5 days. Surviving animals were sacrificed 10 days after the discontinuation of therapy. Both teicoplanin regimens were more effective than the comparative vancomycin (150 mg/kg per day) regimen: 92 versus 43% cured (P =0.025) in the standard-dose group, and 82 versus 37% cured (P = 0.015) in the high-dose group. Results in this rat model of enterococcal endocarditis show that teicoplanin may prove useful in the treatment of serious infections due to high level-gentamicin-resistant enterococci in humans.     

Synergy of combinations of vancomycin, gentamicin, and rifampin against methicillin-resistant, coagulase-negative staphylococci

The activity of combinations of vancomycin (2 or 10 micrograms/ml), gentamicin (0.3 micrograms/ml), and rifampin (0.03 micrograms/ml) against methicillin-resistant, coagulase-negative staphylococcal isolates was determined by the time-kill method. Combinations of rifampin with gentamicin or with vancomycin 2 micrograms/ml demonstrated enhanced killing against 13 of 17 and 13 of 25 strains, respectively. However, rifampin-resistant strains were selected with the latter combination in the remaining 12 of 25 studies.     

Evidence of Less Severe Aortic Valve Destruction after Treatment of Experimental Staphylococcal Endocarditis with Vancomycin and Dexamethasone

The beneficial effects of therapy combining an antibiotic and dexamethasone have been reported in human studies on meningitis and in experimental studies on septic arthritis, nephritis, and endophthalmitis. Since most patients with staphylococcal endocarditis need a combination of medical and surgical treatment, the purpose of this study was to determine whether the addition of dexamethasone to vancomycin has any beneficial effect regarding the degree of valve tissue damage or the course of experimental aortic valve endocarditis caused by a methicillin-resistant strain of Staphylococcus aureus. Rabbits with catheter-induced aortic valve vegetations were randomly assigned to a control group and to groups receiving dexamethasone (0.5 mg/kg of body weight, intravenously [i.v.], twice a day [b.i.d]), vancomycin (30 mg/kg, i.v., b.i.d), or dexamethasone plus vancomycin, for a total of 10 doses (two doses per day for 5 days). The severity of valve tissue damage was significantly less in groups receiving vancomycin plus dexamethasone compared with that of the group receiving vancomycin alone (P < 0.001). The severity of tissue damage was inversely correlated with the mean polymorphonuclear leukocyte number in valve tissue. No statistically significant differences were observed between the vancomycin-treated group and the vancomycin-plus-dexamethasone-treated group in survival, blood culture sterilization rate, or reduction of the microbial burden (in CFU per gram) in valvular tissue. In conclusion, treatment with a combination of vancomycin and dexamethasone for 5 days reduces the severity of valve tissue damage in experimental staphylococcal aortic valve endocarditis. These findings could have significant implications in the treatment of staphylococcal endocarditis and deserve further confirmation in clinical trials.     

Oral temafloxacin versus vancomycin for therapy of experimental endocarditis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

We compared oral temafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone agent, with vancomycin, each with and without rifampin, in the therapy of rats with aortic valve endocarditis caused by a clinical isolate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The temafloxacin, vancomycin, and rifampin MICs and MBCs were 0.78 and 1.56, 1.56 and 3.13, and less than 0.024 and 0.78 microgram/ml, respectively. The animals were classified into the following six treatment groups: vancomycin (60 mg/kg) +/- rifampin (6 mg/kg) each intramuscularly every 12 h for 5 days; temafloxacin (100 mg/kg) orally +/- rifampin (6 mg/kg) intramuscularly every 12 h for 5 days; rifampin (6 mg/kg) intramuscularly every 12 h for 5 days; and untreated controls. All regimens with either vancomycin or temafloxacin resulted in improved survival over controls, but only temafloxacin regimens resulted in a significant reduction in bacterial counts in vegetations. These data support further investigation of the efficacy of temafloxacin in treating serious infections caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus.