Efficacy and costs of secondary prevention with antiplatelets after ischaemic stroke

Ischaemic stroke and other atherothrombotic events substantially increase the medico-economic burden because of their high treatment costs and long-lasting disabilities with need for chronic care. Studies have shown that the cost of stroke represents approximately 3 - 5% of the annual health budget. Antiplatelet agents play a major role in secondary stroke prevention. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), ASA combined with extended-release dipyridamole (ER-Dip), and clopidogrel are all acceptable choices for first-line treatment in the secondary prevention of stroke. The newer antiplatelets, however, are more expensive than ASA, and their cost-effectiveness is not easily estimated. ASA has to be given to 33 stroke patients to prevent one future stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) or vascular death compared with placebo. Adding ER-Dip to ASA increases the benefit for the patients. A total of 33 stroke patients had to be treated with this combination, instead of ASA, to prevent one stroke. However, the combination of ASA plus ER-Dip does not prevent MI, vascular death or the combined end point of either stroke or death. Clopidogrel is more effective than ASA in preventing a combined end point of ischaemic stroke, MI, or vascular death, but it has not been shown to be superior to ASA in preventing recurrent stroke in transient ischaemic attack or stroke patients. Several subgroups, such as stroke patients with additional peripheral artery disease, patients with prior coronary artery bypass, patients with insulin-dependent diabetes, and patients with recurrent vascular events, were identified, in whom the benefit of clopidogrel is amplified. Taking economical aspects into account, the fixed combination of ASA and ER-Dip can be recommended for secondary stroke prevention as a first-line alternative to ASA in patients without major comorbidity. In patients with higher comorbidity, clopidogrel may be more effective for the individual patient compared with ASA, and might also be cost-effective. Furthermore, in patients with ASA intolerance clopidogrel is a useful, but expensive, alternative.     

Antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of recurrent stroke and other serious vascular events: a review of the clinical trial data and guidelines

ABSTRACT

Background: One strategy of reducing the burden of stroke is the prevention of recurrent stroke, following an initial ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) of arterial origin, by means of antiplatelet therapy.

Scope: This review article surveys and discusses the current clinical trial data and guidelines for the use of antiplatelet therapy in the prevention of recurrent stroke/TIA of arterial origin (not stroke due to atrial fibrillation). Based on the latest available evidence, a new antiplatelet treatment algorithm for the long-term treatment of patients following atherothromboembolic ischaemic stroke or TIA is proposed.

Findings: Meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials in patients with TIA and ischaemic stroke of arterial origin indicate that, compared with control, the relative risk reduction (RRR) for recurrent stroke and other serious vascular events is 13% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6% to 19%) with aspirin, 13% (4% to 21%; p = 0.046) with dipyridamole and 34% (24% to 43%) with the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole. Compared with aspirin, the relative risk of recurrent stroke and other serious vascular events is reduced by 7.3% (95% CI –5.7% to 18.7%) with clopidogrel and 18% (9% to 26%; p = 0.0003) with the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole. The combination of aspirin and clopidogrel is not significantly more effective in preventing serious vascular events than clopidogrel alone (RRR 6.4%; –4.6% to 16.3%) in the long-term treatment of patients with previous ischaemic stroke and TIA, mainly because of a cumulative excess of bleeding complications. The relative risks and benefits of long-term treatment with clopidogrel and the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole are being compared in an ongoing large clinical trial (PRoFESS). Current Australian therapeutic guidelines for antiplatelet therapy among patients with TIA and ischaemic stroke of arterial origin have incorporated important new findings from recently published clinical trials and recommend aspirin or the combination of dipyridamole plus aspirin as the preferred long-term antiplatelet therapy.

Conclusion: Whilst awaiting the results of the PRoFESS trial, the combination of dipyridamole plus aspirin is the preferred antiplatelet regimen to reduce the risk of recurrent vascular events among patients with TIA and ischaemic stroke of arterial origin.     

Safety of clopidogrel and aspirin for stroke prevention: implications of the CHARISMA trial.

Antiplatelet therapy is universally recommended for the prevention of recurrent events in patients with noncardioembolic ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), acute and chronic coronary artery disease, or peripheral arterial disease. However, choosing which antiplatelet agents to use in these situations remains controversial. The use of aspirin, aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole, or clopidogrel is recommended as initial therapy in patients with noncardioembolic ischaemic stroke or TIA to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke and other cardiovascular events. Based on the results of the MATCH trial, combination therapy with aspirin plus clopidogrel is not recommended for patients with ischaemic stroke or TIA due to the increased risk of haemorrhage.The results of the CHARISMA trial support this recommendation; despite previous data demonstrating a favourable benefit-risk profile of aspirin plus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome, this combination should not be used in patients at high risk for atherothrombosis and those with previous stroke or TIA. In these patients, the CHARISMA trial demonstrated a lack of significant clinical efficacy and an increased risk of bleeding with clopidogrel plus aspirin compared with aspirin alone.Further research is needed to assess the benefit-risk ratio of clopidogrel plus aspirin in specific subpopulations of patients at high risk for atherothrombotic events, and to determine the role of clopidogrel plus aspirin in preventing cardioembolic stroke or early recurrent stroke after symptomatic large-vessel atherostenosis. Recent and ongoing studies are seeking to better define the roles of different antiplatelet regimens in preventing recurrent stroke.     

Combination antiplatelet agents for secondary prevention of ischemic stroke

Stroke is a leading cause of death and the primary cause of serious, long-term disability in the United States. Joint guidelines from the American Heart Association (AHA) and American Stroke Association (ASA), as well as recent guidelines from the Eighth American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) Conference on Antithrombotic and Antiplatelet Therapy, recommend aspirin, clopidogrel, or extended-release dipyridamole plus aspirin as acceptable first-line options for secondary prevention of ischemic events in patients with a history of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). The ACCP strongly recommends the combination of extended-release dipyridamole plus aspirin over aspirin monotherapy (highest level of evidence) and suggests clopidogrel monotherapy over aspirin monotherapy (lower level of evidence). The AHA-ASA guidelines suggest that either extended-release dipyridamole plus aspirin or clopidogrel monotherapy should be used over aspirin monotherapy. Both guidelines recommend avoiding the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin for most patients with previous stroke or TIA. Results from recent trials evaluating combination antiplatelet therapy have been published that enhance the AHA-ASA recommendations and provide the foundation for the updated ACCP guideline. To identify pertinent combination antiplatelet trials, a MEDLINE search of the literature from 1967-2007 was performed. Two trials were identified--the European-Australasian Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischemia Trial (ESPRIT) and Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance (CHARISMA). The ESPRIT compared aspirin monotherapy with the combination of aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole for prevention of secondary ischemic events in patients with a history of TIA or minor stroke. The CHARISMA trial compared aspirin plus clopidogrel with aspirin alone in a population at high risk for atherothrombotic events using the composite outcome of myocardial infarction, stroke, and death from cardiovascular causes. Data from ESPRIT add to evidence that the combination of aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole is superior to aspirin alone. The findings of the CHARISMA trial reinforce recommendations from both AHA-ASA and ACCP that the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel be reserved for special populations requiring this antiplatelet combination (e.g., those who have had coronary artery stenting).     

Primary and secondary stroke prevention with antiplatelet drugs

Aspirin is not effective in the primary prevention of stroke. Patients with TIA or ischemic stroke carry a risk of recurrent stroke between 5 and 20% per year. In patients with TIA or ischemic stroke of noncardiac origin antiplatelet drugs are able to decrease the risk of stroke by 11-15% and the risk of stroke, MI and vascular death by 15-22%. Aspirin is the most widely used drug. It is affordable and effective. Low doses of 50-325 mg aspirin are as effective as high doses and cause less gastrointestinal side effects. Severe bleeding complications are dose-dependent. The combination of aspirin with slow release dipyridamole is superior to aspirin alone for stroke prevention. Clopidgrel is superior to aspirin in patients at high risk of recurrence. The combination of aspirin plus clopidogrel is not more effective than clopidogrel alone but carries a higher bleeding risk. None of the antiplatelet agents is able to reduce mortality.     

Primary prevention of ischaemic cardiovascular disorders with antiplatelet agents

In those who have already survived myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke, or have had a transient ischaemic episode (TIA), daily low dose aspirin (ASA) reduces the risk of recurrences by an amount that greatly exceeds the risk of serious bleeding (secondary prevention). ASA is therefore recommended for these people. However, in primary prevention-reducing risk in those so far free of clinically manifest episodes-pthe benefit is of the same order as the bleeding hazard, (which is much the same in both primary and secondary prevention contexts). The use of other effective agents such as statins further emphasises the even balance between benefit and hazard in primary prevention. Six primary prevention trials are reviewed, first singly and then in a meta-analysis based on individual patient data. ASA reduced non-fatal myocardial infarction by about 25%. However, death from coronary heart disease (CHD) was not significantly reduced (by 5%), nor was any vascular death (3%). There was a non- significant reduction in strokes of 5%, this being the net result of an 8% reduction in non-fatal stroke and a 21% increase in stroke death (mainly from haemorrhagic events), both effects being non-significant. Serious vascular events (MI, stroke or vascular death) were significantly reduced by 12%, mainly due to the large effect on non-fatal MI. About 1650 people would need to be treated with ASA for a year to avoid one serious vascular event, which contrasts with the 10-20 events avoided in secondary prevention by treating 1,000 patients for a year. Other primary prevention trials not included in the meta-analysis have also reported no benefits in MI or stroke, but the findings of still unpublished trials are awaited. Recently, however, encouraging results have come from meta-analyses of the effects of ASA on cancer incidence and mortality and on its effects on cancer metastasis, particularly for adenocarcinomas. Typically, reductions in these measures have been around 30% following treatment for four or five years, but more in several instances. These results alter the balance in primary prevention between benefit and hazard as it appears for arterial events alone, tipping it towards the use of ASA. Consequently, new guidelines on advice and decisions on ASA in primary prevention are now needed. Low dose ASA, eg. 75 mg daily is as effective as higher doses for all the vascular and cancer benefits established in the meta-analyses, and it causes less serious bleeding than higher doses.     

Clopidogrel: a review of its use in the prevention of atherothrombosis

Clopidogrel is an ADP receptor antagonist that is indicated for the reduction of atherosclerotic events including myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke and vascular death in patients with atherosclerosis manifested by recent stroke, myocardial infarction or established peripheral vascular disease. In the 19 185 patients enrolled in the multicentre, randomised double-blind CAPRIE study, the annual risk of the combined end-point of ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction and death from vascular disease (vascular death) was significantly lower during treatment with clopidogrel 75 mg/day than aspirin 325 mg/day [5.3 vs 5.8%/year, respectively; relative risk reduction (RRR) 8.7%, p = 0.043] after a mean follow-up of 1.9 years. Clopidogrel provided even greater reductions in the risk of recurrent ischaemic events than aspirin in patients with a history of coronary artery bypass surgery, diabetes mellitus and in those receiving concomitant lipid-lowering therapy. Moreover there was a significant reduction in the incidence of hospitalisation in patients treated with clopidogrel. In a patient population (Saskatchewan, Canada) with a greater risk of ischaemic events than the CAPRIE study population, the number of patients needed to be treated with clopidogrel to prevent 1 ischaemic event was estimated to be 70 (vs 200 in the CAPRIE study). In randomised trials and registry surveys, clopidogrel 75 mg/day plus aspirin had similar efficacy (as measured by adverse cardiac outcomes) to ticlopidine 250mg twice daily plus aspirin during the 30 days after placement of intracoronary stents. Tolerability of clopidogrel was significantly better than ticlopidine in the randomised, double-blind CLASSICS study. Among patients treated with clopidogrel or aspirin in the CAPRIE study, the overall gastrointestinal tolerability of clopidogrel was generally better than that of aspirin; the frequency of gastrointestinal haemorrhage was significantly lower among patients treated with clopidogrel than aspirin. Diarrhoea, rash and pruritis were significantly more common with clopidogrel than aspirin. CONCLUSION: Clopidogrel was significantly more effective than aspirin in the prevention of vascular events (ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction or vascular death) [corrected] in patients with atherothrombotic disease manifested by recent myocardial infarction, recent ischaemic stroke or symptomatic peripheral arterial occlusive disease [corrected] in the CAPRIE study. The overall tolerability profile of the drug was similar to that of aspirin, although gastrointestinal haemorrhage occurred significantly less often in clopidogrel recipients. The drug is widely used in combination with aspirin for the prevention of atherothrombosis after placement of intravascular stents, and available data suggest that this combination is as effective as ticlopidine plus aspirin for this indication.     

Clopidogrel in secondary ischemic stroke prevention

The results obtained in the CAPRIE study in 1996 led to the introduction of the clopidogrel as a new antiplatelet drug in the secondary prevention of acute myocardial infarct (AMI), ischemic stroke (IS) and symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD). Clopidogrel showed a similar efficacy and safety than acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). More recently, the combined use of clopidogrel with ASA has evidenced a better protection than ASA alone in some patients: patients with past history of AMI, angina pectoris, intermittent claudication or PAD, IS or TIA, coronary bypass, and diabetes mellitus, patients on treatment with statins, and patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis >/=50%. We review the reported evidence on the efficacy of clopidogrel in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke.     

Prevention of ischaemic stroke--antiplatelets

Aspirin is the treatment of first choice for long-term secondary prevention of vascular events in patients with confirmed non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke or TIA. However, there is no good evidence that it is of benefit in primary stroke prevention. If aspirin is contra-indicated, dipyridamole monotherapy is a relatively cheap, but slightly less effective, alternative. Aspirin and dipyridamole have an additive effect in secondary stroke prevention, but there is a high incidence of side effects and subsequent discontinuation of treatment with combination therapy. It is reasonable to consider clopidogrel for secondary prevention of vascular events in patients with ischaemic stroke who are intolerant of aspirin or dipyridamole, or who have a history of ischaemic heart disease. However, its cost is considerable. Over the next decade, oral antiplatelet agents directed against specific platelet receptors, or a combination of antiplatelet drugs inhibiting different aspects of platelet function, may improve secondary prevention of stroke.     

Effects of ADP-receptor antagonism beyond traditional inhibition of platelet aggregation

Atherothrombosis, or thrombus formation, at the site of a disrupted atherosclerotic plaque is the common pathophysiology related to myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke and peripheral arterial disease. A growing body of evidence demonstrates an important role for vascular inflammation in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis/atherothrombosis and the importance of the platelet as a mediator of inflammation. Clopidogrel is an ADP receptor antagonist that is superior to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) for the prevention of ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction and vascular death in patients with symptomatic atherosclerosis. The use of clopidogrel as well as ASA provides sustained, incremental benefit in patients with coronary manifestations of atherothrombosis. Recent evidence indicates that clopidogrel reduces markers of vascular inflammation across the cerebrovascular, coronary and peripheral circulations. These effects are not observed after treatment with ASA alone. Further studies have revealed that clopidogrel may have potential anticoagulant effects and may inhibit arterial vasoconstriction. These broader effects may contribute to the protective benefits of clopidogrel and should be considered when evaluating antiplatelet agents and optimising antiplatelet regimens.     

Adverse effects and drug interactions of antithrombotic agents used in prevention of ischaemic stroke

Stroke is the third most common cause of death in the US. Primary prevention of stroke can be achieved by control of risk factors including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, elevated cholesterol levels and smoking. Approximately one-third of all ischaemic strokes occur in patients with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). The mainstay of secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke is the addition of medical therapy with antithrombotic agents to control the risk factors for stroke. Antithrombotic therapy is associated with significant medical complications, particularly bleeding.Low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) has been shown to be as effective as high-dose aspirin in the prevention of stroke, with fewer adverse bleeding events. Aspirin has been shown to be as effective as warfarin in the prevention of noncardioembolic ischaemic stroke, with significantly fewer bleeding complications. Ticlopidine may be more effective in preventing stroke than aspirin, but is associated with unacceptable haematological complications. Clopidogrel may have some benefit over aspirin in preventing myocardial infarction, but has not been shown to be superior to aspirin in the prevention of stroke. The combination of clopidogrel and aspirin may be more effective than aspirin alone in acute coronary syndromes, but the incidence of adverse bleeding is significantly higher. Furthermore, the combination of aspirin with clopidogrel has not been shown to be more effective for prevention of recurrent stroke than clopidogrel alone, while the rate of bleeding complications was significantly higher with combination therapy. The combination of aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole has been demonstrated to be more effective than aspirin alone, with the same rate of adverse bleeding complications as low-dose aspirin. When selecting the appropriate antithrombotic agent for secondary prevention of stroke, the adverse event profile of the drug must be taken into account when assessing the overall efficacy of the treatment plan.     

Effects of ADP-receptor antagonism beyond traditional inhibition of platelet aggregation

Atherothrombosis, or thrombus formation, at the site of a disrupted atherosclerotic plaque is the common pathophysiology related to myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke and peripheral arterial disease. A growing body of evidence demonstrates an important role for vascular inflammation in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis/atherothrombosis and the importance of the platelet as a mediator of inflammation. Clopidogrel is an ADP receptor antagonist that is superior to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) for the prevention of ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction and vascular death in patients with symptomatic atherosclerosis. The use of clopidogrel as well as ASA provides sustained, incremental benefit in patients with coronary manifestations of atherothrombosis. Recent evidence indicates that clopidogrel reduces markers of vascular inflammation across the cerebrovascular, coronary and peripheral circulations. These effects are not observed after treatment with ASA alone. Further studies have revealed that clopidogrel may have potential anticoagulant effects and may inhibit arterial vasoconstriction. These broader effects may contribute to the protective benefits of clopidogrel and should be considered when evaluating antiplatelet agents and optimising antiplatelet regimens.     

Dual antiplatelet therapy for prevention of recurrent ischemic events.

The advantages of dual antiplatelet therapy over monotherapy in preventing recurrent ischemic events are examined. Atherosclerosis is an insidious systemic process involving multiple vascular beds, including the cerebral, coronary, and peripheral arteries. Atherosclerotic plaque rupture is one of the inciting events in the progression of platelet activation, aggregation, and thrombus formation. Patients with any clinical manifestation of atherosclerosis are vulnerable to others in different vascular beds since the disease develops throughout the vasculature, and different vascular events have common predisposing risk factors. Ischemic coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease are two of the three most frequent causes of death in the United States. The efficacy of aspirin in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke has been demonstrated in numerous trials. While dipyridamole has not been linked with a greater odds reduction than aspirin in the development of MI, stroke, and vascular death, ticlopidine and clopidogrel have been associated with a greater reduction in the development of acute MI, stroke, and vascular death than aspirin. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of combination antiplatelet therapy in the prevention of recurrent ischemic events are ongoing. The rationale for using a combination of two mechanistically different antiplatelet agents is supported by ex vivo and clinical studies. Inhibition of platelet aggregation and thrombus formation is enhanced with dual antiplatelet therapy. Combination antiplatelet regimens with different mechanisms of action to inhibit multiple sites in the thrombotic pathway may further improve long-term clinical outcomes. Dual antiplatelet therapy may have advantages over monotherapy in the prevention of recurrent ischemic events.     

Prevention of coronary heart disease with aspirin and clopidogrel: efficacy, safety, costs and cost-effectiveness

Atherothrombotic coronary artery disease is the single most common cause of death worldwide and a growing public health problem. Platelets play a central role in the pathogenesis of atherothrombosis and are therefore commonly targeted by one or more antiplatelet drugs as part of primary and secondary atherothrombosis prevention strategies. Aspirin reduces the risk of serious vascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular death) by approximately 20% in a broad range of high-risk patients and remains the first-line antiplatelet drug because of its relative safety, low cost and cost-effectiveness. Compared with aspirin alone, clopidogrel reduces the risk of serious vascular events by approximately 10% and the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel reduces the risk by approximately 20% in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Clopidogrel has a similar safety profile to aspirin but clopidogrel tablets are substantially more expensive. However, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of clopidogrel compared with aspirin is favourable, particularly in high-risk patients and is intermediate compared with a range of other effective therapeutic strategies for the treatment of coronary heart disease. Clopidogrel should be considered as a replacement for aspirin in patients who are allergic to aspirin, cannot tolerate aspirin, have experienced a recurrent atherothrombotic vascular event whilst taking aspirin and are at very high absolute risk of a serious vascular event (e.g., > 20%/year). The combination of clopidogrel and aspirin should be considered in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.     

Aspirin and esomeprazole are superior to clopidogrel in preventing recurrent ulcer bleeding

Although low-dose aspirin is commonly used as the antiplatelet agent to prevent ischaemic events such as myocardial infarction and stroke, clopidogrel is probably superior at preventing ischaemic events. For patients who cannot tolerate aspirin, adding a proton pump inhibitor or substituting clopidogrel are options. Patients with endoscopy-confirmed ulcer healing were assigned to clopidogrel 75 mg/day or aspirin 80 mg/day and esomeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. for 12 months. There were 14 confirmed cases of recurrent ulcer bleeding, with 13 being from the 161 patients taking clopidogrel and 1 from the 159 patients taking aspirin plus esomeprazole. This trial has clearly shown that the combination of aspirin and esomeprazole is superior to clopidogrel in preventing recurrent ulcer bleeding. A more interesting study may have been to compare the effects of aspirin and clopidogrel in the presence of esomeprazole in patients with a history of ulcers.     

Aspirin and esomeprazole are superior to clopidogrel in preventing recurrent ulcer bleeding

Although low-dose aspirin is commonly used as the antiplatelet agent to prevent ischaemic events such as myocardial infarction and stroke, clopidogrel is probably superior at preventing ischaemic events. For patients who cannot tolerate aspirin, adding a proton pump inhibitor or substituting clopidogrel are options. Patients with endoscopy-confirmed ulcer healing were assigned to clopidogrel 75 mg/day or aspirin 80 mg/day and esomeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. for 12 months. There were 14 confirmed cases of recurrent ulcer bleeding, with 13 being from the 161 patients taking clopidogrel and 1 from the 159 patients taking aspirin plus esomeprazole. This trial has clearly shown that the combination of aspirin and esomeprazole is superior to clopidogrel in preventing recurrent ulcer bleeding. A more interesting study may have been to compare the effects of aspirin and clopidogrel in the presence of esomeprazole in patients with a history of ulcers.     

Effects of combined therapy with clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid on platelet glycoprotein expression and aggregation

SUMMARY: This study aimed to compare the effects of clopidogrel, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), and the combination of both substances on platelet aggregation and expression of platelet membrane glycoproteins in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. We investigated platelet activation by flow cytometry and by platelet aggregation and disaggregation in 60 patients randomly assigned to 3 treatment groups: ASA, clopidogrel, combination of clopidogrel and ASA, treated for 14 days. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced expression of P-selectin and of PAC-1 was significantly reduced after 2 wk of clopidogrel but not of ASA treatment. Treatment with clopidogrel reduced the ADP-induced platelet aggregation. The combination of clopidogrel and ASA did not increase the inhibition of platelet activation compared with clopidogrel alone. A significant increase in platelet disaggregation was observed with clopidogrel alone and was more pronounced with the combination of clopidogrel and ASA. ADP-induced platelet degranulation, activation of GPIIb/IIIa receptor, and aggregation in vivo are effectively inhibited by clopidogrel. The significantly increased disaggregation under clopidogrel and ASA suggests that the combined therapy may be superior to the monotherapy in patients with coronary artery disease and a high risk for vascular events.     

Medical prevention of stroke and stroke recurrence in patients with TIA and minor stroke

Background: Secondary stroke prevention after transient ischemic stroke (TIA) or minor stroke is of major importance in order to avoid recurrent cerebrovascular events and decrease morbidity and mortality. Objective/methods: Systematically review of recently published, high-quality studies emphasizing the need for emergency assessment and treatment of patients with TIA and minor stroke and to give a comprehensive and distinct overview over medical secondary stroke prevention trials performed in these patients. Results/conclusions: Evaluation and implementation of preventive stroke therapy has to be immediate in patients with TIA and stroke. For patients with non-cardioembolic stroke, antiplatelet agents are the treatment of choice. Aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole and clopidogrel are more effective than aspirin and should be used in patients with a high risk of recurrent stroke. Oral anticoagulation is highly effective in patients with a cardiac source of embolism. Treatment of risk factors such as arterial hypertension and high cholesterol is even more important in secondary stroke prevention than in primary prevention. Vitamin supplementation and lowering of elevated levels of homocysteine are not effective in stroke prevention.     

The value of clopidogrel versus aspirin in reducing atherothrombotic events: the CAPRIE study

Atherothrombotic disease is a growing health problem, and is increasingly more costly to manage. Clopidogrel is an advanced, specific adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist, which has been shown to be a highly potent antiplatelet agent. Data from the Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischaemic Events (CAPRIE) study have demonstrated the significantly superior clinical benefit of clopidogrel over aspirin for secondary prevention of atherothrombotic disease, with a relative risk reduction in myocardial infarction, stroke or vascular death of 8.7% (95% confidence interval 0.3, 16.5; P = 0.043). Moreover, clopidogrel demonstrated an amplified clinical benefit versus aspirin in patients at high risk of atherothrombotic events, such as those with a previous history of symptomatic atherothrombotic disease or with major risk factors such as diabetes mellitus or hypercholesterolaemia. On the basis of commonly accepted threshold criteria (Euros 20000 per life-year gained; LYG), clopidogrel in comparison with aspirin is cost-effective for the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic disease (cost per LYG ranging from Euros 19462 to Euros 3256). Economic analyses have demonstrated consistent cost-effectiveness results with clopidogrel in different countries. Moreover, in high-risk patient subgroups the cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel in comparison with aspirin was evenbetter (cost per LYG ranging from Euros 5900 to Euros 6310). Compared with other treatment strategies used for the prevention of ischaemic or atherothrombotic events, the cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel in comparison with aspirin based on CAPRIE is favourable, with most analyses in the intermediate range of cost-effectiveness. The available data thus support the use of clopidogrel as a clinically efficient and cost-effective option for secondary prevention of atherothrombotic disease, particularly in high-risk patients.     

Antiplatelet Agents for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes Mellitus

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have accelerated atherothrombotic disease of coronary, cerebral, leg, and other vessels. The major cause of death is cardiovascular, and the risk for a myocardial infarction (MI) in a patient with DM who has never had a MI is the same as a nondiabetic individual who has already had one. In this paper, we review the major reasons for a prothrombotic state in patients with DM: alterations in the intrinsic coagulation and fibrinolytic systems and many abnormalities of platelet function. Increased platelet thromboxane production as well as activation of platelet receptors for fibrinogen and or adenosine diphosphate (ADP) are often present, and can be treated with aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and/or receptor blockers. Review of the major primary prevention trials in DM indicates that a significantly reduced risk for MI or major cardiovascular events may be obtained by enteric-coated aspirin, 81–325 mg/day. There is emerging consensus that this is recommended strategy in adult (aged >30 years) patients with DM who are at high vascular risk. Surveys suggest that this includes virtually every patient with type 2 DM in the US, as well as many patients with complicated type 1 DM. These recommendations are also appropriate for secondary prevention. Data supporting the use of clopidogrel as an alternative drug in the case of aspirin allergy or other contraindications are reviewed. Evidence is presented in support of using aspirin plus clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes (ACS), and a meta-analysis of six trials of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors and aspirin in diabetic patients with ACS establishes this regimen as an effective choice. Although bleeding episodes are more common with combined antiplatelet therapy for ACS than for aspirin alone, the benefit of a significant reduction in 30-day mortality appears to outweigh the risk of major bleeding. It is concluded that major advances in our understanding of the prothrombotic state in DM have been made. Evidence from controlled clinical trials supports the use of enteric-coated aspirin, 81–325 mg/day, as a primary and a secondary prevention strategy in adults with DM with high vascular risk. In ACS, combination therapy with aspirin plus clopidogrel or alternatively, aspirin plus a platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor is supported by prospective trial data. These approaches should be added to the other multifactorial preventive strategies directed at lowering the risk for major vascular events in patients with DM.