Usefulness of tissue harmonic imaging for the detection of left ventricular endocardial border

Assessment of segmental wall motion is one of the most challenging tasks in echocardiography. One major limitation is impairment of echocardiographic regional wall motion by incomplete endocardial definition. The newly developed tissue harmonic imaging method may improve the detection of left ventricular endocardial border. This study examined the impact of native tissue harmonic imaging on endocardial border definition. Fundamental and harmonic imaging were compared for detecting the endocardial border in 96 segments of 16 patients (age 54 +/- 8 years). Visualization of endocardial border was better with harmonic imaging than with fundamental mode in 49% (47 of 96 segments). Thus, tissue harmonic imaging has a significant impact on endocardial border definition.     

Non-contrast second harmonic imaging improves interobserver agreement and accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with impaired image quality

OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of second harmonic imaging during dobutamine echocardiography on regional endocardial visibility, interobserver agreement in the interpretation of wall motion abnormalities, and diagnostic accuracy in patients with reduced image quality. DESIGN: Blinded comparison. SETTING: Tertiary care centre. PATIENTS: 103 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease and impaired transthoracic image quality (>/= 2 segments with poor endocardial delineation). METHODS: Fundamental and second harmonic imaging were performed at each stage of a dobutamine stress echocardiography. Coronary angiography was undertaken within three weeks of dobutamine echocardiography in 75 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evaluation of regional endocardial visibility (scoring from 0 = poor to 2 = good) and of segmental wall motion abnormalities for both modalities separately. A second blinded examiner analysed 70 studies to determine interobserver agreement. RESULTS: Mean (SD) visibility score for all segments was 1.2 (0.4) using fundamental imaging and 1.7 (0.2) using second harmonic imaging at rest (p < 0.001), and 1.1 (0.4) v 1.6 (0.3), respectively, at peak dobutamine dose (p < 0.001). The average number of segments with poor endocardial visibility was lower for second harmonic than for fundamental imaging (0.6 (1.1) v 3.8 (2.6) at rest, p < 0.001; 0.9 (1.3) v 4.3 (2.9) at peak dose, p < 0.001). Improvement was most pronounced in all lateral and anterior segments. The kappa value for identical study interpretation increased from 0. 40 to 0.69 (p < 0.05). Sensitivity for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease was 64% using fundamental imaging versus 92% using harmonic imaging (p < 0.001), while specificity remained unchanged at 75% for both imaging modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Second harmonic imaging enhances endocardial visibility during dobutamine echocardiography. Consequently, interobserver agreement on stress echocardiography interpretation and diagnostic accuracy are significantly improved compared to fundamental imaging. Thus, in difficult to image patients, dobutamine echocardiography should be performed using second harmonic imaging.     

Head-to-head comparison of fundamental, tissue harmonic and contrast harmonic imaging with or without an air-filled contrast agent, levovist, for endocardial border delineation in patients with poor quality images.

Recent developments in tissue harmonic imaging and intravenous contrast agents have enhanced left ventricular endocardial border delineation (EBD). In a total of 48 patients with poor quality images, apical 4- and 2-chamber views were obtained with fundamental, tissue harmonic and contrast harmonic imaging with or without intravenous Levovist, an air-filled contrast agent. The left ventricle (LV) was divided into 12 segments, and the EBD of each segment was scored: (1) not visible, (2) barely visible, (3) well delineated. The EBD index (EBDI), defined as the sum of the endocardial scores divided by 12 was obtained for each patient. Of a total of 576 LV segments, 231 were scored as 1 by fundamental imaging and that number decreased to 125 segments by tissue harmonic imaging and 116 segments by fundamental imaging with Levovist. The number of segments scored as 1 decreased to 38 segments by tissue harmonic imaging with Levovist, and to 29 segments by contrast harmonic imaging with Levovist. The EBDI by fundamental imaging was 1.85+/-0.29, which improved significantly with the addition of Levovist (2.10+/-0.36, p<0.001) and was nearly identical to that by tissue harmonic imaging (2.15+/-0.32, p=NS). Tissue and contrast harmonic imaging with Levovist further enhanced the EBDI (2.43+/-0.26, 2.51+/-0.27, respectively). Levovist enhances EBD, even in the fundamental mode, to the level obtained with tissue harmonic imaging. Tissue harmonic and contrast harmonic imaging are the best modalities for enhancing EBD after Levovist injection.     

Diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of contrast echocardiography on evaluation of cardiac function in technically very difficult patients in the intensive care unit

Echocardiographic assessment of cardiac function can be quite difficult in the intensive care unit and may require transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). We therefore compared harmonic imaging alone or in combination with contrast to TEE in 32 consecutive patients in the intensive care units who were considered technically very difficult (> or =50% of the 16 segments not visualized from any view). Excellent or adequate endocardial visualization was achieved in 13% of segments with fundamental imaging, 34% with harmonic imaging, and 87% with contrast (p < 0.0001); the latter success rate was similar to TEE (87% vs 90%; p = NS). When TEE was used as the standard, agreement in exact interpretation of wall motion increased from 48% for fundamental imaging to 58% with harmonic imaging, and reached 70% with contrast (p <0.0001). Contrast had the best sensitivity (89%) for detecting wall motion abnormalities. Estimation of ejection fraction was possible in 31% with fundamental imaging, 50% with harmonic imaging, and in 97% with contrast. Ejection fraction quantitated by contrast enhancement correlated best with TEE (r = 0.91). Cost-effectiveness analysis revealed that contrast echo was cost-effective compared with TEE in determining regional and global ventricular function, with a cost saving of 3% and 17%, respectively. Thus, contrast echocardiography provides an accurate, safe, and cost-effective alternative to TEE for evaluating ventricular function in technically very difficult studies.     

Quantitative evaluation of regional endocardial visualisation with second harmonic imaging and contrast left ventricular opacification in heart failure patients.

AIMS: Wall motion score index (WMSI) is an important prognostic indicator in heart failure (HF) patients but requires endocardial visualisation. This study evaluated the role tissue harmonic imaging (THI) and contrast opacification (LVO) for improving endocardial visualisation and the determination of WMSI in HF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-one HF patients and 30 controls underwent apical echocardiography with fundamental imaging (FUND), THI and THI with contrast agent (Levovist). Visualisation and motion were graded in the six segments from each of the apical two and four chamber views. Both THI and LVO reduced the percentage of non-visualised segments (FUND 13.6%, THI 5.6%, LVO 2.8%, p=0.01) in the controls, but in HF patients, only THI improved visualisation (% segments not visualised FUND 9.7%, THI 3.5%, LVO 4.8%, p=0.06). The anterior and lateral walls were the least well visualised with FUND, but improved with LVO (anterior p=0.0026, lateral p=0.0003). No improvement was seen in the inferior wall (p=0.30) or septum (p=0.2). WMSI was similar by all methods and negatively correlated with ejection fraction (FUND r=-0.69, THI r=-0.74, LVO r=-0.77, all p<0.001). CONCLUSION: THI improved endocardial visualisation in all subjects and LVO offered additional benefit in the controls, but not in HF patients. Regional endocardial visualisation was inconsistent. Thus, both patient factors and wall segment site need to be considered when using contrast agents for endocardial visualisation.     

Improvement in Endocardial Border Delineation Using Tissue Harmonic Imaging

Background and Methods: For years, tissue has been assumed to be a linear medium in diagnostic ultrasound applications; thus, no backscattered signals in the second harmonic band are expected in harmonic imaging without the injection of a contrast agent. However, it has been shown that a useful tissue image is formed even without a contrast agent. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether this tissue harmonic image provided improved visualization of endocardial borders. Fifty-six adult patients with various heart diseases were investigated using conventional two-dimensional echocardiography and tissue harmonic imaging. In 30 of these patients, the left ventricular endocardial borders were well defined in the standard parasternal and apical views using conventional two-dimensional echocardiography. In the remaining 26 patients, delineation of endocardial borders was not possible in at least two segments. The equipment used was an ATL HDI-3000 diagnostic system equipped with harmonic imaging. Results: In all 56 patients, the myocardium and valves could be imaged with tissue harmonic imaging. Harmonic recordings were sharper and contained fewer clutter artifacts than conventional recordings. Most striking was the enhancement of left ventricular endocardial borders. In the 26 patients with incomplete delineation of left ventricular endocardial borders, wall motion could be evaluated in 290 of 312 (93%) segments with tissue harmonic imaging compared with only 168 of 312 (54%) segments with conventional echocardiography (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Tissue harmonic imaging improves image quality and can be used to enhance the definition of left ventricular endocardial borders. These findings can be explained by the nonlinear propagation of ultrasound within the tissue, which results in distortion of the transmitted signal and, thus, harmonic generation.     

Contrast and harmonic imaging improves accuracy and efficiency of novice readers for dobutamine stress echocardiography

BACKGROUND: Newer contrast agents as well as tissue harmonic imaging enhance left ventricular (LV) endocardial border delineation, and therefore, improve LV wall-motion analysis. Interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiography is observer-dependent and requires experience. This study was performed to evaluate whether these new imaging modalities would improve endocardial visualization and enhance accuracy and efficiency of the inexperienced reader interpreting dobutamine stress echocardiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-nine consecutive patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography. Both fundamental (2.5 MHZ) and harmonic (1.7 and 3.5 MHZ) mode images were obtained in four standard views at rest and at peak stress during a standard dobutamine infusion stress protocol. Following the noncontrast images, Optison was administered intravenously in bolus (0.5-3.0 ml), and fundamental and harmonic images were obtained. The dobutamine echocardiography studies were reviewed by one experienced and one inexperienced echocardiographer. LV segments were graded for image quality and function. Time for interpretation also was recorded. Contrast with harmonic imaging improved the diagnostic concordance of the novice reader to the expert reader by 7.1%, 7.5%, and 12.6% (P < 0.001) as compared with harmonic imaging, fundamental imaging, and fundamental imaging with contrast, respectively. For the novice reader, reading time was reduced by 47%, 55%, and 58% (P < 0.005) as compared with the time needed for fundamental, fundamental contrast, and harmonic modes, respectively. With harmonic imaging, the image quality score was 4.6% higher (P < 0.001) than for fundamental imaging. Image quality scores were not significantly different for noncontrast and contrast images. CONCLUSION: Harmonic imaging with contrast significantly improves the accuracy and efficiency of the novice dobutamine stress echocardiography reader. The use of harmonic imaging reduces the frequency of nondiagnostic wall segments.     

Usefulness of the new imaging techniques, second harmonic and contrast in endocardial border visualization. Reliability analysis in segmental contraction assessment

AIM: This study sought to determine if newer techniques significantly improve endocardial border definition in suboptimal acoustic windows, and the reproducibility of the evaluation of wall motion abnormalities according to the different techniques and degrees of expertise. METHODS: We studied a total of 20 consecutive patients with poor ultrasound window, to assess, if the use of tissue harmonic imaging (2H) or contrast with second harmonic (Levovist ; 4 g i.v.), (2HC) improves endocardial border visualization.In order to analyze inter and intraobserver reliability with the different techniques, four observers with different degrees of expertise were each asked to assess the segmental wall motion score of 31 consecutive echocardiograms. RESULTS: The quality of the image was clearly superior with 2H and 2HC compared with 2D. This difference was larger in apex and lateral endocardial border from 0.9 and 1 to 1.5 and 1.64 (p < 0.001) with 2H. 2HC was found to slightly but significantly improve the endocardial definition in apex compared with 2H (1.64 vs 1.81; p = 0.016).The percentage of segments assessed for interobserver variability significantly improve with 2H and 2HC (2D = 50%, 2H = 75% and 2HC = 95%). Interobserver agreement with the different techniques between the experienced observers did not statistically differ. The less experienced observer presented a significantly lower interobserver reliability than those with experience, and did not improve with 2H and 2HC. CONCLUSIONS: a) Native tissue harmonic imaging and second harmonic imaging with contrast (Levovist ) significantly improves endocardial border visualization; b) the newer imaging techniques significantly improve performance (percentage of evaluated segments) without decreasing reliability, and c) experience in assessing wall motion is the main factor in interobserver agreement.     

Enhanced visualisation of the right ventricle by contrast echocardiography in congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Contrast echocardiography improves endocardial border detection of the left ventricle. Whether this is also true for the right ventricle (RV) is unknown. The aim of this study is to assess whether the use of contrast (Sonovue) echocardiography has additional value in RV endocardial border visualisation (EBV), and whether it has impact on the echocardiographic judgement of RV function. METHODS: Twenty adult patients with congenital heart disease were imaged using second harmonic two-dimensional echocardiography with and without contrast. Two independent observers analysed EBV of 13 RV wall segments in each patient. EBV was graded for each wall segment from 0 to 3 ( 0 = not visible, 3 = optimal visible). RESULTS: EBV improved in all patients with contrast echocardiography compared to second harmonic imaging (mean EBV 1.00 +/- 0.77 with second harmonics, 2.13 +/- 0.75 with contrast, P < 0.0001). The benefit was most evident in the near-field images. In 55% of the patients visual estimation of RV function changed with contrast echocardiography. CONCLUSION: The use of contrast echocardiography is superior to second harmonic imaging for RV EBV. Improved EBV may allow more accurate assessment of RV dimensions and function.     

Contrast echocardiography improves interobserver agreement for wall motion score index and correlation with ejection fraction

Background: The wall motion score index (WMSI) is a surrogate for left ventricular ejection fraction (LV‐EF), which becomes unreliable in poor echo windows. The value of contrast LV opacification (LVO) for WMSI assessment is not well known. Objectives: We sought to compare interobserver agreement for WMSI and the correlation between the LVO‐WMSI and LV‐EF using two‐dimensional second harmonic (SH) and LVO echocardiography. Methods: The study comprised 100 consecutive patients (57 ± 13 years, 85% males). Two independent physicians assessed LV segmental quality and wall motion for both the SH and LVO studies according to a 17‐segment model. Systolic wall motion was defined as: normokinesia, hypokinesia (systolic inward endocardial motion <7 mm), akinesia, and dyskinesia. LV‐EF was assessed from the LVO images according to the biplane modified Simpson's method. Results: Of the 1,700 analyzed segments, 453 (26.6%) were poorly visualized with SH imaging, and 173 (10.2%) with LVO (P < 0.0001). The two observers agreed on segmental wall motion score in 1,299 segments (agreement 76%, Kappa 0.60) with SH imaging and in 1,491 segments (agreement 88%, Kappa 0.78) with LVO. Interobserver correlation (r²) was 0.86 for the SH‐WMSI and 0.93 for the LVO‐WMSI. The limits‐of‐agreement for interobserver LVO‐WMSI (mean difference –1.0%± 6.8%, agreement –14.6%, 12.6%) was lower than that for SH‐WMSI (mean difference –2.3%± 10.1%, agreement –22.5, 17.9). The LVO‐WMSI correlated well with LV‐EF (r²= 0.71). LV‐EF could be estimated according to the formula 1.01 – 0.32 × WMSI. Conclusion: Echo‐contrast improves interobserver agreement for wall motion scoring and the WMSI. The LVO‐imaged WMSI correlates well with LV‐EF. (Echocardiography 2011;28:575‐581)     

Role of Contrast Echocardiography for the Assessment of Left Ventricular Function

The endocardial border of the left ventricle is incompletely identified in at least 30% of patients at rest or during stress echocardiography during fundamental imaging. This may lead to inaccurate assessment of regional and global left ventricular function or may lead to further diagnostic imaging with another modality resulting in a higher cost of healthcare. The recent development of second generation ultrasound contrast agents has resulted in improved detection of endocardial border at rest and during stress fundamental echocardiography. This has been consistently shown in various clinical trials involving 702 patients using a new contrast agent, SonoVue™. Other studies with contrast agents have also shown improved accuracy for determining left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes. Although unenhanced tissue harmonic imaging itself improved the assessment of left ventricular function, contrast enhanced harmonic imaging has recently been shown to be more accurate; however, larger clinical studies are required to establish the value of harmonic contrast imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function.     

Verbesserung der Endokarderkennung mittels modifizierter transthorakaler Echokardiographie unter Verwendung der zweiten harmonischen Schwingungen (Tissue Harmonic Imaging)

In human tissue sound propagation is not linear resulting in a modification of the ultrasound waves. Therefore the received ultrasound frequencies are not just the transmitted frequencies of the transducer, but contain additional harmonic frequencies. These frequencies were not used by standard echocardiography. Harmonic imaging processes the second harmonic frequency. Distortion of the transmitted beam by shallow surface layers or reverberations between the skin surface and ribs impair image quality in conventional 2-dimensional echocardiography. Since harmonic components develop with propagation distance, the reverberations are almost entirely made up of ultrasound energy at the fundamental frequency. The exclusive processing of the second harmonic frequency provides an impressive improvement in image quality of 2-dimensional echocardiograms. Noise and clutter artifacts are reduced and endocardial borders are enhanced. Commercially available imagers provide tissue harmonic imaging using transmit frequencies from 1.7 to 2.1 MHz and second harmonic frequencies between 3.4 and 4.2 MHz. Several clinical studies have shown that harmonic imaging was superior to standard echocardiography in the assessment of left ventricular (LV) wall motion by LV wall motion analysis. In patients with poor acoustic windows the number of myocardial segments which could be evaluated was significantly higher using harmonic imaging than standard echocardiography. Tissue harmonic imaging particularly improves the delineation of the anterior wall using the 2-chamber view and the lateral wall using the 4-chamber view. CONCLUSION: Harmonic imaging is a clinically relevant improvement of echocardiography. We suggest that this new technology should be the method of choice in the evaluation of LV function.     

Imagent improves endocardial border delineation,inter-reader agreement,and the accuracy of segmental wall motion assessment

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to assess the ability of a new echocardiographic contrast agent, Imagent (perflexane lipid microspheres; Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp., San Diego, CA), to improve endocardial border delineation (EBD) and assessment of segmental wall motion (SWM). This was achieved by analysis of inter-reader agreement by echocardiography and comparison with an independent imaging technique, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Two separate, independent, prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trials were conducted at 26 centers and included a total of 409 efficacy-evaluable patients. In Study A 206 patients were randomized to receive either Imagent or saline and in Study B, 203 patients received Imagent with a subset imaged by both echocardiography and MRI. All patients were required to have suboptimal baseline images using fundamental imaging. Images were optimized at baseline prior to contrast and the settings maintained post-contrast. Imagent, a suspension of perfluorohexane-filled spheres with flexible lipid shells, was administered as an IV bolus at 0.125 mg/kg body weight. Gated MRI studies were performed within 48 hours of dosing in a subset of 26 subjects. Six expert independent blinded readers reviewed unpaired noncontrast and contrast exams and scored EBD and SWM. Analysis of inter-reader agreement was performed by comparing the SWM score (1 to 5) recorded by each reader pair. In addition, unanimity between readers for SWM was evaluated. For comparison to MRI, the results from echo readers 4, 5, and 6 were each compared with a single independent MRI reader. RESULTS: The patients enrolled in these clinical trials displayed markedly suboptimal images with 49% and 71% (Study A and Study B) of the segments determined by the readers to be suboptimal prior to contrast administration. All readers recorded statistically significant (P < 0.0001) improvement in total EBD scores following the administration of Imagent. Comparison of noncontrast SWM scores for each pair of echo readers resulted in agreement in an average of 39%, of segments in Study A, and 31% of the segments in Study B. Use of Imagent improved agreement in SWM scores to 65% in Study A, and 48% of segments in Study B (P < 0.0001) for all reader pairs in both studies. Reader unanimity in SWM scores increased from 13% to 41% of the segments with the administration of Imagent. Blinded review of the noncontrast echo examinations resulted in agreement with MRI derived SWM scores in 15% of the segments. The administration of Imagent improved this agreement to 47%, of the segments (P < pr = 0.0005 for each blinded reader). CONCLUSIONS: Use of Imagent during echocardiographic imaging improves EBD, providing a significant improvement in inter-reader agreement in SWM evaluation with echo and greater than a threefold improvement in SWM scoring accuracy with MRI.     

Effect of contrast enhancement on transthoracic echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular regional wall motion

The use of contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography to evaluate left ventricular regional wall motion was determined by comparison of echocardiographic data with assessments obtained by magnetic resonance imaging. When left ventricular endocardial segments are well visualized after contrast enhancement, the ability to determine normal versus abnormal endocardial thickening with echocardiography is similar to cine magnetic resonance imaging.     

Analysis of myocardial perfusion or myocardial function for detection of regional myocardial abnormalities. An echocardiographic multicenter comparison study using myocardial contrast echocardiography and 2D echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Echocardiography based myocardial perfusion imaging and regional wall motion analysis are used for evaluation of coronary artery disease and regional myocardial abnormalities. AIM: This study sought to compare myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) and 2D echocardiography with regard to interobserver variability and detection of regional myocardial abnormalities. METHODS: In 70 patients evenly distributed between three ejection fraction groups based on biplane cineventriculography ( > 55%, 35-55%, < 35%), unenhanced and contrast enhanced 2D echocardiography and myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE; SonoVue; Bracco) were performed. Regional wall motion and myocardial perfusion were assessed referring to a 16 segment model. Interobserver agreement (IOA) among 2 readers was determined within each imaging modality. To define a standard of truth for the presence of segmental myocardial disease an independent expert-panel decision was obtained based on clinical data, ECG, coronary angiography and blinded information from the imaging modalities. RESULTS: Regional wall motion assessment was possible in 98.1% of segments using contrast enhanced 2D echocardiography and in 87.2% using unenhanced 2D echocardiography (p < 0.001), while perfusion assessment was possible in 90.1% of segments (p < 0.001). IOA on presence of any regional wall motion abnormality expressed as Kappa coefficient was 0.71 (95% CI 0.53-0.89) for contrast enhanced echocardiography and 0.37 (95% CI 0.14-0.59) for unenhanced echocardiography. IOA on presence of any perfusion abnormality was 0.53 (95% CI 0.34-0.73). For MCE there was high IOA for the apical segments (kappa = 0.57) and lower IOA for the basal segments (kappa=0.14), while no such gradient was found for the IOA on wall motion abnormalities. Mean accuracy to detect expert-panel defined myocardial abnormalities was 80.6% for unenhanced echocardiography, 85.0% for contrast enhanced 2D echocardiography and 80.6% for MCE. CONCLUSIONS: MCE is inferior to contrast enhanced 2D echocardiography with regard to visibility of all LV segments and appears slightly inferior with regards to IOA, while both are superior to unenhanced 2D echocardiography. The methods demonstrated high accuracy in detection of panel defined regional myocardial abnormalities.     

Comparison of four echocardiographic techniques for measuring left ventricular ejection fraction

Accurate quantitative measurement of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) by 2-dimensional echocardiography is limited by subjective visual endocardial border detection. Both harmonic and precision contrast microbubbles provide better delineation of endocardial borders than fundamental imaging. The aim of this study was to correlate 2-dimensional echocardiographic quantification of LVEF measured by 4 currently available techniques with radionuclide angiography. A total of 50 patients who underwent radionuclide (EF) measurement (47 of 50 had technically difficult echocardiograms by fundamental imaging) underwent echocardiography by 4 methods: fundamental alone, fundamental with contrast, harmonic alone, and harmonic with contrast. Three echocardiologists measured the biplane 2-dimensional echocardiographic LVEF independently and were blinded to radionuclide angiography. The correlation of echocardiographic EF with radionuclide EF improved incrementally with each method. However, contrast with harmonic imaging provided the closest correlation (r = 0.95, 0.96, and 0.95 as assessed by the 3 independent analysts.     

Strain Rate Imaging by Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Regional Dysfunction of the Left Ventricle

Background: Regional strain rate in the left ventricle can be assessed by tissue Doppler velocity gradient and color mapped in real time. Regional contractility thus can be visualized and graded. To validate the method, we made a comparison with standard echocardiography. Methods and Results: Fifteen patients with recent myocardial infarction were examined with the use of strain rate imaging (SRI). Velocity gradients were mapped by color. Gray-scale imaging was performed using the second harmonic mode. Cine loops of two-dimensional echocardiography (2-D echo) and SRI images from three standard apical planes were analyzed offline. A four-grade scale in 16 segments was used to score wall motion by 2-D echo and by SRI. Of a total of 236 segments, 235 segments were analyzable by 2-D echo and 218 segments were analyzable by SRI. Correlation of wall motion score index with ejection fraction was – 0.84 by 2-D echo and – 0.92 by SRI. One hundred fourteen segments had an equal score by the two methods: 51 segments differed by 1 degree and 14 segments differed by 2 degrees (K = 0.45). Conclusions: SRI agrees well with echocardiography in grading regional wall function, and the method can be seen as validated in a clinical setting for assessment of regional systolic wall function and is demonstrated to be applicable for semiquantitative wall motion assessment. SRI has theoretical advantages and may be a valuable addition to standard echocardiography, especially in the field of stress echocardiography.     

For left ventricular opacification and endocardial border definition: is it really important which contrast agent we use, or is it the imaging modality we choose?

AIMS: The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the effect of three imaging modalities (fundamental, harmonics, and power harmonics) on left ventricular opacification and endocardial border definition with two different echo agents, Optison and Albunex. METHODS: A total of 84 patients who had suboptimal transthoracic images were studied with echo contrast agents Albunex (n=41) and Optison (n=43). Each contrast agent was examined with three different imaging modalities, fundamental, harmonics and power harmonics, respectively. Left ventricular opacification was obtained by videodensitometric analysis. Percentage of endocardial border visualization was determined by indexing circumference of visualized endocardium to total circumference. Variables were compared with respect to three imaging modalities between two different echo agents. RESULTS: Higher videointensities and higher percentages of endocardial visualization were achieved with Optison compared to Albunex with fundamental and harmonics. However, there was no significant difference between Optison and Albunex with respect to LV opacification and border visualization by power harmonics. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that left ventricular opacification and endocardial border visualization is significantly improved by using power harmonic imaging as compared to harmonics or fundamental imaging following both echo contrast agents. Furthermore, although Optison is clearly superior to Albunex in opacifying left ventricle, power harmonic imaging compensates for the less robust agent.     

Contrast echocardiography clarifies uninterpretable wall motion in intensive care unit patients

OBJECTIVES: The study examined the value of contrast echocardiography in the assessment of left ventricular (LV) wall motion in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. BACKGROUND: Echocardiograms done in the ICU are often suboptimal. The most common indication is the evaluation of LV wall motion and ejection fraction (EF). METHODS: Transthoracic echocardiograms were done in 70 unselected ICU patients. Wall motion was evaluated on standard echocardiography (SE), harmonic echocardiography (HE), and after intravenous (IV) contrast echocardiography (CE) using a score for each of 16 segments. A confidence score was also given for each segment with each technique (unable to judge; not sure; sure). The EF was estimated visually for each technique, and a confidence score was applied to the EF. RESULTS: Uninterpretable wall motion was present in 5.4 segments/patient on SE, 4.4 on HE (p = 0.2), and 1.1 on CE (p < 0.0001). An average of 7.8 segments were read with surety on SE, 9.2 on HE (p = 0.1), and 13.7 on CE (p < 0.0001). Ejection fraction was uninterpretable in 23% on SE, 13% on HE (p = 0.14), and 0% on CE (p = 0.002 vs. HE; p < 0.0001 vs. SE). The EF was read with surety in 56% of patients on SE, 62% on HE (p = 0.47), and 91% on CE (p < 0.0001). Thus, wall motion was seen with more confidence on CE. More importantly, the actual readings of segmental wall motion and EF significantly differed using CE. CONCLUSIONS: CE should be used in all ICU patients with suboptimal transthoracic echocardiograms.     

Klinische Wertigkeit der intraven?sen Kontrastmittelechokardiographie zur Quantifizierung der linksventrikul?ren Volumina und Funktion bei Patienten mit reduzierter echokardiographischer Bildqualit?t

In the present study, we investigated whether the intravenous injection of air-filled albumin microspheres (Infoson) as a contrast medium improves the echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular enddiastolic and endsystolic volumes, stroke volume, ejection fraction, and regional wall motion in patients with suboptimal endocardial border definition on echocardiography. In 30 adult patients, apical two and four chamber views were performed. In comparison to biplane cineventriculography enddiastolic and endsystolic volumes, stroke volume, ejection fraction, and regional wall function were assessed for heart cycles with and without left ventricular contrast.In comparison to biplane cineventriculography echocardiography underestimates enddiastolic (167+/-64 ml, 111+/-43; p<0.0001) and endsystolic volumes (77+/-63 ml, 54+/-40 ml; p<0.0002), stroke volume (90+/-25 ml, 57+/-17 ml; p<0.0001), and ejection fraction (58+/-16%, 55+/-14%; p<0.03). By contrast echocardiography ejection fraction (58+/-16%) agreed with the angiocardiographically measured ejection fraction. Furthermore, after contrast injection correlations improved between cineventriculography and echocardiography for the assessment of left ventricular enddiastolic volumes (without contrast r = 0.90, SEE = 19 ml; with contrast r = 0.93, SEE = 19 ml), endsystolic volumes (without contrast r = 0.94, SEE = 14 ml; with contrast r = 0.95, SEE = 15 ml), stroke volume (without contrast r = 0.63, SEE = 14 ml; with contrast r = 0.67, SEE = 14 ml), ejection fraction (without contrast r = 0.84, SEE = 8%; with contrast r = 0.88, SEE = 7%), regional wall motion (p<0.01) and its reproducibility (p<0.02). In adult patients with suboptimal endocardial border delineation intravenous contrast echocardiography improves the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction, regional wall motion, and its reproducibility without severe side effects.