Postoperative adjuvant treatments for biliary tract cancer

Surgery currently remains the only potentially curative treatment for biliary tract cancer, and most patients develop recurrence. Thus, effective adjuvant therapy is required to increase the curability of surgery and to prolong the survival in these patients. However, to date, no standard postoperative adjuvant therapy regimen has been established for patients with biliary tract cancer. Based on favorable results reported from phase II trials, gemcitabine and S-1 are currently available as promising agents for the treatment of unresectable biliary tract cancer in Japan. Both agents are also expected to be effective in the postoperative adjuvant therapy setting for biliary tract cancer, and well-designed randomized controlled trials (phase III trials) to determine the efficacy of these agents in the postoperative adjuvant setting should be pursued vigorously. In phase III trials, appropriate stratification of patients is important, and the primary disease (gallbladder cancer versus nongallbladder cancers), curability (R0 or R1), and presence/absence of lymph node metastasis should be taken into account.     

Guidelines for the management of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas: surgical treatment

The only curative treatment in biliary tract cancer is surgical treatment. Therefore, the suitability of curative resection should be investigated in the first place. In the presence of metastasis to the liver, lung, peritoneum, or distant lymph nodes, curative resection is not suitable. No definite consensus has been reached on local extension factors and curability. Measures of hepatic functional reserve in the jaundiced liver include future liver remnant volume and the indocyanine green (ICG) clearance test. Preoperative portal vein embolization may be considered in patients in whom right hepatectomy or more, or hepatectomy with a resection rate exceeding 50%–60% is planned. Postoperative complications and surgery-related mortality may be reduced with the use of portal vein embolization. Although hepatectomy and/or pancreaticoduodenectomy are preferable for the curative resection of bile duct cancer, extrahepatic bile duct resection alone is also considered in patients for whom it is judged that curative resection would be achieved after a strict diagnosis of its local extension. Also, combined caudate lobe resection is recommended for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Because the prognosis of patients treated with combined portal vein resection is significantly better than that of unresected patients, combined portal vein resection may be carried out. Prognostic factors after resection for bile duct cancer include positive surgical margins, especially in the ductal stump; lymph node metastasis; perineural invasion; and combined vascular resection due to portal vein and/or hepatic artery invasion. For patients with suspected gallbladder cancer, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not recommended, and open cholecystectomy should be performed as a rule. When gallbladder cancer invading the subserosal layer or deeper has been detected after simple cholecystectomy, additional resection should be considered. Prognostic factors after resection for gallbladder cancer include the depth of mural invasion; lymph node metastasis; extramural extension, especially into the hepatoduodenal ligament; perineural invasion; and the degree of curability. Pancreaticoduodenectomy is indicated for ampullary carcinoma, and limited operation is also indicated for carcinoma in adenoma. The prognostic factors after resection for ampullary carcinoma include lymph node metastasis, pancreatic invasion, and perineural invasion.     

Diagnosis of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas

Diagnostic methods for biliary tract carcinoma and the efficacy of these methods are discussed. Neither definite methods for early diagnosis nor specific markers are available in this disease. When this disease is suspected on the basis of clinical symptoms and risk factors, hemato-biochemical examination and abdominal ultrasonography are performed and, where appropriate, enhanced computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is carried out. Diagnoses of extrahepatic bile duct cancer and ampullary carcinoma are often made based on the presence of obstructive jaundice. Although rare, abdominal pain and pyrexia, as well as abnormal findings of the hepatobiliary system detected by hemato-biochemical examination, serve as a clue to making a diagnosis of these diseases. On the other hand, the early diagnosis of gallbladder cancer is scarcely possible on the basis of clinical symptoms, so when this cancer is found with the onset of abdominal pain and jaundice, it is already advanced at the time of detection, thus making a cure difficult. When gallbladder cancer is suspected, enhanced CT is carried out. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), in particular — one of the methods of enhanced CT — is useful for decision of surgical criteria, because MDCT shows findings such as localization and extension of the tumor, and the presence or absence of remote metastasis. Procedures such as magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopic ultrasonography, bile duct biopsy, and cholangioscopy should be carried out taking into account indications for these procedures in individual patients. However, direct biliary tract imaging is necessary for making a precise diagnosis of the horizontal extension of bile duct cancer.     

Flowcharts for the management of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas

No strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of biliary tract carcinoma have been clearly described. We developed flowcharts for the diagnosis and treatment of biliary tract carcinoma on the basis of the best clinical evidence. Risk factors for bile duct carcinoma are a dilated type of pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM) and primary sclerosing cholangitis. A nondilated type of PBM is a risk factor for gallbladder carcinoma. Symptoms that may indicate biliary tract carcinoma are jaundice and pain in the upper right area of the abdomen. The first step of diagnosis is to carry out blood biochemistry tests and ultrasonography (US) of the abdomen. The second step of diagnosis is to find the local extension of the carcinoma by means of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC), and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Because resection is the only way to completely cure biliary tract carcinoma, the indications for resection are determined first. In patients with resectable disease, the indications for biliary drainage or portal vein embolization (PVE) are checked. In those with nonresectable disease, biliary stenting, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and/or best supportive care is selected.     

Preoperative biliary drainage for biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas

We posed six clinical questions (CQ) on preoperative biliary drainage and organized all pertinent evidence regarding these questions. CQ 1. Is preoperative biliary drainage necessary for patients with jaundice? The indications for preoperative drainage for jaundiced patients are changing greatly. Many reports state that, excluding conditions such as cholangitis and liver dysfunction, biliary drainage is not necessary before pancreatoduodenectomy or less invasive surgery. However, the morbidity and mortality of extended hepatectomy for biliary cancer is still high, and the most common cause of death is hepatic failure; therefore, preoperative biliary drainage is desirable in patients who are to undergo extended hepatectomy. CQ 2. What procedures are appropriate for preoperative biliary drainage? There are three methods of biliary drainage: percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD), endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) or endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD), and surgical drainage. ERBD is an internal drainage method, and PTBD and ENBD are external methods. However, there are no reports of comparisons of preoperative biliary drainage methods using randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Thus, at this point, a method should be used that can be safely performed with the equipment and techniques available at each facility. CQ 3. Which is better, unilateral or bilateral biliary drainage, in malignant hilar obstruction? Unilateral biliary drainage of the future remnant hepatic lobe is usually enough even when intrahepatic bile ducts are separated into multiple units due to hilar malignancy. Bilateral biliary drainage should be considered in the following cases: those in which the operative procedure is difficult to determine before biliary drainage; those in which cholangitis has developed after unilateral drainage; and those in which the decrease in serum bilirubin after unilateral drainage is very slow. CQ 4. What is the best treatment for postdrainage fever? The most likely cause of high fever in patients with biliary drainage is cholangitis due to problems with the existing drainage catheter or segmental cholangitis if an undrained segment is left. In the latter case, urgent drainage is required. CQ 5. Is bile culture necessary in patients with biliary drainage who are to undergo surgery? Monitoring of bile cultures is necessary for patients with biliary drainage to determine the appropriate use of antibiotics during the perioperative period. CQ 6. Is bile replacement useful for patients with external biliary drainage? Maintenance of the enterohepatic bile circulation is vitally important. Thus, preoperative bile replacement in patients with external biliary drainage is very likely to be effective when highly invasive surgery (e.g., extended hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma) is planned.     

Stenting and interventional radiology for obstructive jaundice in patients with unresectable biliary tract carcinomas

Together with biliary drainage, which is an appropriate procedure for unresectable biliary cancer, biliary stent placement is used to improve symptoms associated with jaundice. Owing to investigations comparing percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD), surgical drainage, and endoscopic drainage, many types of stents are now available that can be placed endoscopically. The stents used are classified roughly as plastic stents and metal stents. Compared with plastic stents, metal stents are of large diameter, and have long-term patency (although they are expensive). For this reason, the use of metal stents is preferred for patients who are expected to survive for more than 6 months, whereas for patients who are likely to survive for less than 6 months, the use of plastic stents is not considered to be improper. Obstruction in a metal stent is caused by a tumor that grows within the stent through the mesh interstices. To overcome such problems, a covered metal stent was developed, and these stents are now used in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction. However, this type of stent has been reported to have several shortcomings, such as being associated with the development of acute cholecystitis and stent migration. In spite of these shortcomings, evidence is expected to demonstrate its superiority over other types of stent.     

Risk factors for biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas and prophylactic surgery for these factors

Curative resection is the only treatment for biliary tract cancer that achieves long-term survival. However, patients with advanced biliary tract cancer have only a limited prognosis even after radical surgical resection. Thus, to improve the longterm results, the early detection of biliary tract cancer and subsequent cure seem to be essential. The purpose of this study was to review the literature concerning the risk factors for cancerous and precancerous lesions of the biliary tract, and prophylactic surgery for these factors. It has been reported that pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM) with bile duct dilatation is a risk factor for gallbladder cancer and bile duct cancer, while PBM without bile duct dilatation is a risk factor for gallbladder cancer. Thus, in the former group, a prophylactic excision of the common bile duct and gallbladder should be recommended, while in the later group, a prophylactic cholecystectomy without bile duct resection may be the appropriate surgical procedure. It has also been reported that primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a risk factor for cholangiocarcinoma. Patients with PSC often develop advanced cholangiocarcinoma with a poor prognosis. In patients with PSC, therefore, strict follow-up should be recommended. Adenoma and dysplasia have been regarded as precancerous lesions of gallbladder cancer. A polypoid lesion of the gallbladder that is sessile, has a diameter greater than 10 mm, and /or grows rapidly, is highly likely to be cancerous and should be resected. Although gallstones seem to be closely associated with gallbladder cancer, there is no evidence of a direct causal relationship between gallstones and gallbladder cancer. Thus, a cholecystectomy is not advised for asymptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Controversy remains as to whether adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder and porcelain gallbladder are associated with gallbladder cancer. With respect to ampullary carcinoma, adenoma of the ampulla is considered to be a precancerous lesion. This article discusses the risk factors for cancerous and precancerous lesions of the biliary tract and prophylactic treatment for these factors.     

Clinical results of intra-arterial adjuvant chemotherapy for prevention of liver metastasis following curative resection of biliary tract cancer

Background. This is a report on the clinical results of intra-arterial adjuvant chemotherapy in the prevention of liver metastasis following curative resection of biliary tract cancer. Methods. Nineteen patients of advanced biliary tract underwent a pathologically radical operation between 2001 and 2006 (8 M and 11 F; mean age 66.2 years). Intra-arterial adjuvant chemotherapy with CDDP and 5-FU was performed selectively for 9 patients. The control group comprised 10 patients. Age, gender, staging of the disease, resection of the portal vein, postoperative radiotherapy, histological liver invasion as demographics and clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups. Results. Demographics and clinical characteristics were similar in the two groups. Liver metastasis occurred in 4 of 9 patients (44.4%) in the chemotherapy group and in 5 of 10 patients (50%) in the control group. There was no difference in the rate of liver metastasis between the two groups. The median survival term was 23.3 months for 9 patients who underwent the intra-arterial adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas the median survival term for 10 patients who were curatively resected without intra-arterial adjuvant chemotherapy was 21.7 months. The median survival term was statistically similar in both groups. Furthermore, in the recurrence-free survival, there was no major difference between the chemotherapy and control groups statistically. Conclusions. In the patients with advanced biliary tract cancer who underwent the curative operation, the intra-arterial adjuvant chemotherapy could not suppress the rate of liver metastasis nor improve cumulative survival.     

Purpose, use, and preparation of clinical practice guidelines for the management of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas

Apart from periampullary carcinoma, the prognosis of biliary tract carcinomas, including hilar cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic biliary tract carcinoma, and gallbladder carcinoma, remains poor. Sophisticated diagnostic skills and treatment methods and their application are naturally required to achieve better treatment results for biliary tract carcinomas. However, it is not too much to say that, due to the paucity of high-level evidence for the management of these carcinomas, medical care by healthcare providers in clinics and at medical institutes throughout the world is currently delivered without common consensus and common standards. The clinical practice guidelines for the management of biliary carcinoma outlined here were produced with the aim that they could be used by physicians involved in the care of biliary tract carcinomas, as indicators that could help them provide their patients with the most appropriate care possible at this time. Also, the guidelines were prepared to provide measures that could assure patients with biliary tract carcinomas of safe medical care. The present guidelines are characterized by their clarification of clinical questions assumed to be often shared by healthcare professionals. For clarity, we divided the contents of the guidelines into eight areas. In each area, clinical questions are presented, together with recommendations of clinical actions in response to the question. As mentioned already, there is a paucity of high-level evidence in this area; therefore, the recommendations are classified into grades, of which there are five: A, strongly recommend performing the clinical action; B, recommend performing the clinical action; C1, the clinical action may be useful, although there is a lack of high-level scientific evidence; C2, clinical action not definitively recommended ecause of insufficient scientific evidence; D, recommend not performing the clinical action. The grading of the recommendations is based on the determination of the level of evidence in references on which the recommendation is based.     

Effect of biliary drainage on chemotherapy in patients with biliary tract cancer: an exploratory analysis of the BT22 study

Background/purpose

Complications from biliary drainage in biliary tract cancer (BTC) may influence the relative dose intensity of chemotherapy or increase adverse events during chemotherapy. BT22 was a randomized phase II trial, the results of which were consistent with those of a phase III trial in non-Japanese that demonstrated the effectiveness of gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination therapy (GC) in BTC. The purpose of this exploratory analysis of the BT22 study was to identify the possible effects of biliary drainage on the efficacy and safety of GC or gemcitabine monotherapy (G).

Patients and Methods

The 83 BTC patients who received GC or G in BT22 were retrospectively analysed in two subgroups dependent upon whether biliary drainage was performed before study entry. Efficacy and safety of treatment (GC vs. G) were compared in these two groups.

Results

The GC arm had a higher 1-year survival rate and longer median survival time (MST) than the G arm independent of prior biliary drainage. Patients in the drainage subgroup developed cholangitis more frequently, however, the frequency of grade 3/4 adverse events did not differ between the treatment regimens with/without drainage.

Conclusions

Biliary drainage before chemotherapy did not affect the therapeutic efficacy or tolerability of chemotherapy using G or GC.     

Phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND: The aim of this phase II study was to determine the efficacy of gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma with measurable tumor in the biliary tract that was unresectable and either locally advanced or metastatic. Patients received a combination of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) intravenously [IV] on days 1, 8, and 15) and cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) IV on day 1). Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Objective tumor response rates and toxicities were evaluated according to World Health Organization criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled in the study and a total of 120 cycles of chemotherapy were administrated. Objective partial response was observed in nine (33.3%) patients, while stable disease was found in seven (25.9%) patients. The median survival time was 10.0 months and the 1-year survival rate was 36%. Median time to disease progression was 5.6 months. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were leukopenia (25.9%), anemia (29.6%), thrombocytopenia (22.2%), and vomiting (18.5%). Only one patient was hospitalized for chemotherapy-related complications. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer.     

Radiation therapy and photodynamic therapy for biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas

The purpose of radiation therapy for unresectable biliary tract cancer is to prolong survival or prolong stent patency, and to provide palliation of pain. For unresectable bile duct cancer, there are a number of studies showing that radiation therapy is superior to the best supportive care. Although radiation therapy is used in many institutions, no large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been performed to date and the evidence level supporting the superiority of this treatment is low. Because long-term relief of jaundice is difficult without using biliary stenting, a combination of radiation therapy and stent placement is commonly used. As radiation therapy, external-beam radiation therapy is usually performed, but combined use of intraluminal brachytherapy with external beam radiation therapy is more useful for making the treatment more effective. There are many reports demonstrating improved response rates as well as extended survival and time to recurrence achieved by this combination therapy. Despite the low level of the evidence, this combination therapy is performed at many institutions. It is expected that multiinstitutional RCTs will be carried out. Unresectable gallbladder cancer with a large focus is usually extensive, and normal organs with high radio sensitivity exist contiguously with it. Therefore, only limited anticancer effects are to be expected from external beam radiation therapy for this type of cancer. The number of reports on ampullary cancer is small and the role of radiation therapy in this cancer has not been established. Combination treatment for ampullary cancer consists of either a single use of intraoperative radiation therapy, postoperative external beam radiation therapy or intraluminal brachytherapy, or a combination of two or three of these therapies. Intraoperative radiation therapy is superior in that it enables precise irradiation to the target site, thereby protecting adjacent highly radiosensitive normal tissues from irradiation. There are reports showing extended survival, although not significant, in groups undergoing intraoperative or postoperative radiation therapy compared with groups without radiation therapy. To date, there are no reports of large RCTs focusing on the significance of radiation therapy as a postoperative adjuvant treatment, so its usefulness as a postoperative adjuvant treatment is not proven. An alternative treatment is photodynamic therapy. There is an RCT demonstrating that, in unresectable bile duct cancer, extended survival and improved quality of life (QOL) have been achieved through a combination of photodynamic therapy and biliary stenting, compared with biliary stenting alone. Results from large RCTs are desired.     

New advances in the management of biliary tract cancer

Biliary tract cancers are uncommon malignancies arising from biliary epithelium intrahepatically (peripheral cholangiocarcinoma), in the extrahepatic bile duct, the gall bladder and the ampulla of Vater. Treatment has been challenging because of late presentation, complex surgery, complex biliary obstruction with jaundice and a paucity of high quality data on which to establish standard care. With improvements in imaging, biliary stenting, surgical management and the establishment of a national investigational programme we hope to define the modern management of biliary tract cancers and enable a platform for further research.     

Prevalence of pancreatic and biliary tract tumors in pancreas divisum

Background The present study was undertaken to evaluate the prevalence of pancreatic and biliary tract tumors in pancreas divisum (PD). Methods A retrospective single-center study was performed, and a total of 118 cases of complete PD and 7850 cases of fused pancreas were identified among the 8537 consecutive new endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) examinations performed between 1980 and 2002. The prevalence of pancreatic cancer (PCA), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), other pancreatic tumors, and biliary tract cancer in the patients with PD and the patients with a fused pancreas were compared. Results The prevalence of the pancreatic tumors in the PD patients was: PCA, 10%; IPMN, 5.1%; other pancreatic tumors, 2.5%. The prevalence of pancreatic tumors in the patients with a fused pancreas was: PCA, 4.8%; IPMN, 2.6%; and other pancreatic tumors, 1.1%. The prevalence of PCA was significantly higher in the patients with PD than in those with a fused pancreas (P = 0.008; OR, 2.24). The percentages of PD patients with PCA who had pancreatic-type pain and a serum pancreatic enzyme elevation were significantly higher than among the PD patients without PCA. The prevalence of biliary tract cancer was 0.8% in the PD group and 5.3% in the fused pancreas group, and it was significantly lower in PD than in fused pancreas (P = 0.031). Conclusions The results of this study showed a significantly higher prevalence of PCA in PD than in fused pancreas. We concluded that patients with PD, especially patients presenting with pancreatic-type pain and pancreatic enzyme elevation, should be carefully followed up because of the risk of developing PCA.     

High serum concentrations of sialyl Tn antigen in carcinomas of the biliary tract and pancreas

Sialyl-Tn (STn) antigen is a cancer-associated carbohydrate antigen expressed in cancers of the digestive tract. In the present study, we compared the serum level of STn antigen in 14 patients with benign diseases of the biliary tract and pancreas, 15 patients with bile duct cancers, and 9 patients with cancer of the pancreas. High levels of serum STn (>45 U/ml) were frequently detected in patients with carcinoma of the biliary tract (53.3%) or pancreas (55.6%), compared with the detection of high levels in those with benign diseases (14.3%;P < 0.05). Serum levels of STn did not correlate with the presence of jaundice, cholangitis, or pancreatitis, or with the level of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) or carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19–9. In cancer tissues, the expression of STn antigen detected by immunostaining correlated significantly with serum STn (P < 0.05). Our results indicate that measurement of serum STn level may be potentially useful for the diagnosis of carcinomas of the biliary tract and pancreas, particularly when combined with other tumor markers such as CEA or CA19-9.     

The efficiency and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced biliary tract cancers based on gene profiles: A retrospectively controlled study

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are potential agents to improve the survival of advanced biliary tract cancers (ABTCs). The current results are controversial because the predictors are imprecise. We present our primary experience with ABTCs based on gene landscape with exciting outcomes. ABTCs who were admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology from October 2019 to March 2021 were enrolled. They were divided into chemotherapy group or immunotherapy group according to the treatment. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were response and toxicities. SSPS 16.0 was used for statistical analysis. A total of 33 patients were enrolled, including 25 in the chemotherapy group and 8 in the immunotherapy group. The median OS and PFS of the chemotherapy group were 2 and 4 months, respectively. The estimated median OS and PFS of immunotherapy were 10 + and 10 + months, respectively. The differences of OS and PFS between the 2 groups were significant (P = .000; P = .003). Stratified analysis showed that these differences were mainly from those patients with high expression of PD-L1 > 10%. The difference in the overall response was significant between 2 groups (χ² = 9.275; P = .026). The difference in adverse events between the 2 groups was not significant. Immune checkpoint inhibitors were effective and safe for ABTCs with high expression of PD-L1. The threshold should be precise.