共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 9 毫秒
1.
2.
覆膜血管内支架置入治疗B型主动脉夹层的临床应用研究 总被引:5,自引:0,他引:5
目的:评价覆膜血管内支架置入治疗B型主动脉夹层的疗效。方法:180例B型主动脉夹层,男158例,女22例,年龄(50.4±10.9)岁。术前行计算机体层摄影术(CT)增强扫描检查。在数字减影血管造影(DSA)监测下选用覆膜血管内支架封堵夹层原发破口。置入后即刻重复DSA检查。随访行胸部X线平片与CT增强扫描检查。结果:技术成功率99.4%(179/180),1例支架位置过高,行外科升主动脉-左颈总动脉-左锁骨下动脉搭桥术。术后即刻造影160例无内漏,18例少量内漏,2例中量内漏近段加短袖套支架(Cuff)后内漏消失;降主动脉真腔明显扩大,腹主动脉及分支供血均有不同程度的改善。术后随访(18.6±7.2)个月,18例少量内漏12例6个月内消失、6例无加重;21例支架段假腔消失,余者近端假腔内均有血栓形成;1例支架远端形成假性动脉瘤破裂死亡。结论:覆膜血管内支架置入治疗B型主动脉夹层安全有效,近、中期疗效满意,远期疗效有待于进一步观察。 相似文献
3.
4.
Purpose: To analyze our single-center experience of thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR) using the EndoFit Thoracic Aortic Endograft. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 87 consecutive patients (64 men; median age 67.8+/-8.7 years, range 24-88) undergoing TEVAR using the EndoFit thoracic stent-graft from December 2005 to December 2007. Slightly more than half (n = 46) of the patients had thoracic aortic aneurysm, while 41 had thoracic aortic dissection. Seventeen cases were performed emergently. All patients had imaging follow-up before discharge; at 1, 3, and 6 months; and annually thereafter. Results: The technical success rate was 100%. Fifty-five (63.2%) patients had different debranching procedures to extend the proximal or distal landing zone. The in-hospital and 30-day mortality rate was 9.2% (8/87). Neurological complications occurred in 8 (9.3%) patients, including 5 strokes (2 fatal) and 3 cases of paraplegia. One intraoperative massive bleeding from an ascending aortic debranching anastomosis was rescued with the aid of a pump. Five patients had immediate proximal type I endoleak; 3 were remedied with a proximal cuff, 1 was rescued with tri-lobe balloon, and 1 was left untreated. One type II endoleak remains under observation. The average follow-up was 15.2 months (range 5-29), during which 10 (11.5%) patients died of causes unrelated to the aneurysm or stent-graft. All the extra-anatomical bypasses and stent-grafts were patent; no stent-graft kinking, collapse, or dislocation was detected. Two post-TEVAR proximal endoleaks were remedied with a proximal cuff after debranching. There was no post-TEVAR rupture or conversion to open surgery. Conclusion: Our 2-year single-center experience using the EndoFit system for TEVAR showed a high technical success rate and a low incidence of device- or aneurysm-related complications. The flexible, hydrophilic introducer was easy to insert and track through the vasculature. The debranching techniques to extend the landing zones not only broaden the applicability of TEVAR but also reduce post-TEVAR complications. 相似文献
5.
6.
Complicated Acute Aortic Syndromes Affecting the Descending Thoracic Aorta: Endovascular Treatment Compared With Open Repair 下载免费PDF全文
Guering Eid‐Lidt MD FSCAI Jorge Gaspar Hernández MD FSCAI FACC Hector González‐Pacheco MD FACC Pablo Acevedo Gómez MD Samuel Ramírez Marroquín MD Valentín Herrera Alarcon MD Jorge Cervantes Salazar MD Marco Martínez‐Ríos MD FSCAI FACC 《Clinical cardiology》2015,38(10):585-589
7.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement in patients who are considered high surgical risk or inoperable due to advanced age and comorbidities. Randomized trial and registry data have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of TAVR in such patients. Currently available transcatheter heart valves (THVs) employ either balloon-expandable or self-expanding designs, and several new designs have shown promising early results. Differences in valve design may offer specific advantages for accurate deployment and minimizing complications. This article reviews several designs of self-expanding THVs that are currently available or have undergone successful implantation in humans. Additional studies are required to compare the relative performance of these devices. 相似文献
8.
腔内隔绝术治疗胸主动脉夹层动脉瘤 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
近年来兴起的腔内隔绝术,在治疗胸主动脉夹层动脉瘤中取得了令人满意的临床疗效。初步研究表明腔内隔绝术具有微创、简便、安全有效、并发症少、术后恢复快的优点。 相似文献
9.
Peter Chiu Andrew B. Goldstone Justin M. Schaffer Bharathi Lingala D. Craig Miller R. Scott Mitchell Y. Joseph Woo Michael P. Fischbein Michael D. Dake 《Journal of the American College of Cardiology》2019,73(6):643-651
Background
For the management of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms, recent evidence has suggested that outcomes of open surgical repair may surpass thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in as early as 2 years.Objectives
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of TEVAR and open surgical repair in the treatment of intact descending thoracic aortic aneurysms.Methods
Using the Medicare database, a retrospective study using regression discontinuity design and propensity score matching was performed on patients with intact descending thoracic aortic aneurysms who underwent TEVAR or open surgical repair between 1999 and 2010 with follow-up through 2014. Survival was assessed with restricted mean survival time. Perioperative mortality was assessed with logistic regression. Reintervention was evaluated as a secondary outcome.Results
Matching created comparable groups with 1,235 open surgical repair patients matched to 2,470 TEVAR patients. The odds of perioperative mortality were greater for open surgical repair: high-volume center, odds ratio (OR): 1.97 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.53 to 2.61); low-volume center, OR: 3.62 (95% CI: 2.88 to 4.51). The restricted mean survival time difference favored TEVAR at 9 years, ?209.2 days (95% CI: ?298.7 to ?119.7 days; p < 0.001) for open surgical repair. Risk of reintervention was lower for open surgical repair, hazard ratio: 0.40 (95% CI: 0.34 to 0.60; p < 0.001).Conclusions
Open surgical repair was associated with increased odds of early postoperative mortality but reduced late hazard of death. Despite the late advantage of open repair, mean survival was superior for TEVAR. TEVAR should be considered the first line for repair of intact descending thoracic aortic aneurysms in Medicare beneficiaries. 相似文献10.
Splenic artery aneurysm, one of the most common visceral aneurysms, accounts for 60% of all visceral aneurysm cases. Open surgery is the traditional treatment for splenic artery aneurysm but has the disadvantages of serious surgical injuries, a high risk of complications, and a high mortality rate.We report a case who was presented with splenic artery aneurysm. A 54-year-old woman complained of upper left abdominal pain for 6 months. An enhanced computed tomography scan of the upper abdomen indicated the presence of splenic artery aneurysm. The splenic artery aneurysm was located under digital subtraction angiography and a 6/60 mm stent graft was delivered and released to cover the aneurysm. An enhanced computed tomography scan showed that the splenic artery aneurysm remained well separated, the stent graft shape was normal, and the blood flow was unobstructed after 1 year.This case indicates a satisfactory efficacy proving the minimal invasiveness of stent graft exclusion treatment for splenic artery aneurysm. 相似文献
11.
《JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions》2015,8(10):1359-1367
ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the safety and clinical performance of the CoreValve Evolut R transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) system (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota) in a single-arm, multicenter pivotal study in high- or extreme-risk patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis.BackgroundAlthough outcomes following TAVR are improving, challenges still exist. The repositionable 14-F equivalent CoreValve Evolut R TAVR system was developed to mitigate some of these challenges.MethodsSuitable patients (n = 60) underwent TAVR with a 26- or 29-mm Evolut R valve. Primary safety endpoints were mortality and stroke at 30 days. Primary clinical performance endpoints were device success per the VARC-2 (Valve Academic Research Consortium-2) and the percent of patients with mild or less aortic regurgitation 24 h to 7 days post-procedure.ResultsPatients (66.7% female; mean age 82.8 ± 6.1 years; Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score 7.0 ± 3.7%) underwent TAVR via the transfemoral route in 98.3%, using a 29-mm valve in 68.3% of patients. All attempts at repositioning were successful. No death or stroke was observed up to 30 days. The VARC-2 overall device success rate was 78.6%. Paravalvular regurgitation post TAVR was mild or less in 96.6%, moderate in 3.4%, and severe in 0% at 30 days. Major vascular complications occurred in 8.3%, and permanent pacemaker implantation was required in 11.7% of patients.ConclusionsThe repositionable 14-F equivalent Evolut R TAVR system is safe and effective at treating high-risk symptomatic aortic stenosis patients. Repositioning was successful when required in all patients, with low rates of moderate or severe paravalvular aortic regurgitation and low permanent pacemaker implantation. (The Medtronic CoreValve™ Evolut R™ CE Mark Clinical Study; NCT01876420) 相似文献
12.
Bhushan S. Sonawane Sreeja Pavithran Kothandam Sivakumar 《Texas Heart Institute journal / from the Texas Heart Institute of St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Texas Children's Hospital》2021,48(5)
Coral reef aorta is a rare calcifying obstructive disease that involves the thoracoabdominal aorta. Similar presentations in the postsubclavian aorta may result in acquired atheromatous aortic coarctation leading to systemic hypertension and heart failure. The associated calcification makes surgical anatomic or extraanatomic bypass and thromboendarterectomy challenging. Extensive circumferential calcification often precludes endovascular intervention. We present the case of a 25-year-old man with an acquired atheromatous coarctation of the postsubclavian aorta who underwent successful endovascular treatment with use of a balloon-expandable covered stent. 相似文献
13.
目的:总结右位主动脉弓、右位降主动脉、迷走左锁骨下动脉伴DeBakeyⅢ型主动脉夹层的外科治疗经验.方法:4例右位主动脉弓、右位降主动脉、迷走左锁骨下动脉伴DeBakeyⅢ型主动脉夹层患者,经右后外侧切口,分别行部分胸降主动脉切除人工血管替换术或部分胸降主动脉切除人工血管替换加远端胸降主动脉成形术,并根据迷走左锁骨下动脉在头部及上肢血供中起的作用大小,重建左锁骨下动脉或缝闭其开口.结果:所有患者均痊愈出院,无头部及左上肢缺血症状,无神经系统并发症.结论:右位主动脉弓、右位降主动脉、迷走左锁骨下动脉伴DeBakeyⅢ型主动脉夹层采用右后外侧切口可获得良好的显露,根据降主动脉扩张范围行部分胸降主动脉切除人工血管替换术或部分胸降主动脉切除人工血管替换加远端胸降主动脉成形术可获得良好效果,迷走左锁骨下动脉的适当处理是避免左上肢坏死及锁骨下动脉窃血综合征的关键. 相似文献
14.
15.
16.
Purpose of Review
This review discusses the benefits of a completely percutaneous approach to endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), and provides an outline as to how this is performed by a multidisciplinary team of cardiologists and cardiovascular surgeons at a quaternary care community hospital.Recent Findings
Percutaneous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (PEVAR) as compared to EVAR utilizing surgical femoral artery exposure is associated with a significant reduction in operation time, length of stay, access site complications, patient discomfort, and procedural cost. Furthermore, PEVAR may be the preferred approach in patients presenting with aneurysm rupture, as the avoidance of general anesthesia has been associated with improved 30-day mortality.Summary
Assuming no contraindication based on vascular anatomy, clinical status, or patient preference, these findings suggest that in properly selected patients, PEVAR should be the primary method for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in both stable and unstable patients.17.
18.
19.
20.
《JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions》2015,8(7):962-971
ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine whether transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the mechanically expanded Lotus valve (Boston Scientific, Natick Massachusetts) offers potential benefits over treatment with the self-expanding CoreValve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota).BackgroundNew-generation transcatheter aortic valve systems are emerging in clinical trials and practice with design features aimed at improving safety and efficacy. To date, these devices have not been compared systematically with current-generation devices.MethodsA total of 100 patients (83.4 ± 4.8 years of age, 44% male, Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score of 5.5 ± 2.4) were assessed. Fifty consecutive patients undergoing a Lotus transcatheter aortic valve replacement were enrolled and compared with 50 matched patients treated with a CoreValve. An independent core laboratory reviewed all echocardiographic data, and an independent clinical events committee adjudicated all events.ResultsValve Academic Research Consortium 2–defined device success was 84% and 64% in the Lotus and CoreValve cohorts, respectively (p = 0.02). This difference was driven by lower rates of moderate or greater aortic regurgitation (4% vs. 16.7%, respectively; p = 0.04) and higher rates of successfully implanting a single device in the correct anatomic position (100% vs. 86%, respectively; p = 0.06). Cardiovascular mortality rate (0% vs. 4%, respectively; p = 0.32), major stroke rate (4% vs. 2%, respectively; p = 0.56), and permanent pacemaker insertion rate (28% vs. 18%, respectively; p = 0.23) were not different at 30 days in the Lotus and CoreValve cohorts.ConclusionsIn this matched comparison of high surgical risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement, the use of the Lotus device was associated with higher rates of Valve Academic Research Consortium 2–defined device success compared with the CoreValve. This was driven by higher rates of correct anatomic positioning and lower incidences of moderate paraprosthetic regurgitation. The clinical significance of these differences needs to be tested in a large randomized, controlled trial. 相似文献