In-vivo ovarian androgen responses to recombinant FSH with and without recombinant LH in polycystic ovarian syndrome

BACKGROUND: Effects of exogenous LH on ovarian androgen secretion during ovulation induction have not been clearly characterized in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). The purpose of this study was to compare androgen secretion in PCOS women during ovarian stimulation with either recombinant FSH (rFSH) alone or combined with recombinant LH (rLH). METHODS: Clomiphene-resistant women with PCOS were allocated, in a factorial study design, to receive either daily injections of rFSH (n = 24) or rFSH + rLH (n = 24) in a 1:1 ratio starting: (i) on day 2-3 of progestogen-induced menses (n = 8); (ii) after 6 weeks of GnRH agonist treatment (nafarelin, 400 micro g twice daily; n = 8); or (iii) after nafarelin treatment as in (ii) plus dexamethasone (n = 8). The effects of rFSH with rFSH + rLH under these three hormone conditions on serum LH, 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP), androstenedione (DeltaDelta(4)) and testosterone were contrasted by analysis of variance with specific treatment days as a repeated measures factor. RESULTS: Pre-study hormone levels were similar for all groupings. Nafarelin significantly suppressed LH levels, which remained at the lower limit of assay sensitivity (0.5 IU/l) during stimulation with rFSH but increased significantly to >1 but <2 IU/l when rLH was added. As expected, 17-OHP, DeltaDelta(4) and testosterone levels fell following nafarelin treatment. Dexamethasone further suppressed 17-OHP, DeltaDelta(4) and testosterone levels and unmasked a small but significant rise in these ovarian steroids 24 h following the first dose of rFSH + rLH, a rise that was absent with rFSH alone. Secretion of these steroids then appeared to 'catch-up' after 5 days of rFSH stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Despite profound LH, 17-OHP, DeltaDelta(4) and testosterone suppression, comparable E(2) response, follicle development and successful pregnancies in PCOS subjects receiving rFSH alone to those receiving rFSH + rLH would argue that circulating LH at levels as low as 0.5 IU/l are sufficient to sustain adequate follicle development and function when FSH is present in abundance. Whether the observed dichotomy between rFSH and rFSH + rLH treatment in temporal secretion patterns reflects a greater reliance on evolving paracrine mechanisms as the follicles mature under profound LH suppression remains to be explored but may influence the optimal LH threshold for ovulation induction in PCOS.     

Recombinant LH supplementation to recombinant FSH during the final days of controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. A multicentre, prospective, randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this multicentre, multinational trial was to study whether rLH supplementation to recombinant FSH (rFSH) during the late follicular phase increased pregnancy rates. METHODS: After down-regulation with nafarelin, 526 women were randomized on Day 1 of stimulation to use either rFSH (Gonal-F) alone (n = 261) or to continue after Day 6 of stimulation with both rFSH (Gonal-F) and rLH (Luveris) (n = 265) from Day 6. The starting dose of rFSH was 150-225 IU/day according to age below or above 35 years. RESULTS: Ongoing pregnancy rate at week 10-12 was 28.7% after rFSH alone and 27.2% after rFSH + rLH. This showed no evidence of a difference. Administration of rLH significantly (P< 0.001) increased serum LH. Ongoing pregnancy rates in patients with low LH levels (<33 percentile) on Days 1 and 6 of stimulation showed no difference between the group treated with rFSH only (23.9% low Day 1 LH; 22.1% low Day 6 LH) versus rFSH + rLH (25.0% low Day 1 LH; 28.9% low Day 6 LH). CONCLUSIONS: Supplementing rFSH with daily doses of 75-150 IU of rLH during the second half of the follicular phase showed no evidence of increasing the ongoing pregnancy rates in the general population. (ClinicalTrials.gov, trial number: KF02-035/03).     

Rescue of IVF cycles by HMG in pituitary down-regulated normogonadotrophic young women characterized by a poor initial response to recombinant FSH

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of adding human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) during controlled ovarian stimulation in normoovulatory normogonadotrophic patients showing an initial suboptimal response to a standardized long protocol therapy with recombinant FSH (rFSH) (300 IU/day). METHODS: A total of 43 such patients were randomized in two groups. In Group A, 150 IU rFSH was substituted by 150 IU HMG after day 8 of stimulation. The stimulation protocol of Group B involved a simple increase of the daily rFSH dose to 375 IU after day 8. A total of 40 BMI and age matched patients with an optimal ovarian response formed the control group (Group C). RESULTS: The mean Group A serum concentration of oestradiol on the day of HCG administration and average number of oocytes retrieved were significantly higher than Group B (P < 0.001) and equivalent to Group C. A total of 10 pregnancies (50%) in Group A, 8 (34.8%) in Group B and 19 (47.5%) in the control group were achieved. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that LH supplementation improves the ovarian outcome in patients characterized by an inadequate initial response to rFSH therapy in a long protocol.     

Clinical evidence for an LH 'ceiling' effect induced by administration of recombinant human LH during the late follicular phase of stimulated cycles in World Health Organization type I and type II anovulation

BACKGROUND: The objective of these studies was to test the hypothesis that over-dosing with recombinant human LH (rLH) during the late follicular phase would suppress the development of follicles. METHODS: Two double-blind studies were conducted. In study A, WHO I anovulatory patients received treatment with rFSH and rLH. When at least one follicle reached a mean diameter of 10-13 mm, patients were randomized using a computer-generated randomization list (stratified by centre) to rFSH and rLH (225 IU/day) (n = 8) or rLH alone (n = 6) or rFSH alone (n = 6). In study B, WHO II anovulatory patients with a hyper-responsive FSH were randomized to rLH (225 IU/day) (n = 4) or rLH 450 IU/day (n = 8) or placebo (n = 5). RESULTS: Study A: the mean number of follicles >/=11 mm was 4.2 +/- 0.3 in the rFSH group, 1.5 +/- 0.7 in the rLH group and 6.0 +/- 2.3 in the rFSH/rLH group (P = 0.07). 0/8 patients presented follicular growth arrest in the rFSH group, but 4/6 in the rLH group and 1/6 in the rFSH/rLH did. Study B: 5/12 patients presented follicular growth arrest in the rLH groups, but none in the placebo group. The mean number of follicles >/=11 mm was 4.6 +/- 1.8 for the placebo group, 2.5 +/- 1.9 for the rLH 225 IU group and 4.2 +/- 1.4 in the rLH 450 IU group (not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Results of this pilot study suggest that rLH alone can trigger follicular growth arrest in a significant number of patients, suggesting the existence of an 'LH ceiling' during late follicular maturation.     

Recombinant human LH supplementation during GnRH antagonist administration in IVF/ICSI cycles: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: When administered in the late follicular phase to prevent an LH surge, GnRH antagonists induce a sharp decrease in serum LH levels that may be detrimental for assisted reproductive technology cycle outcome. Therefore, a prospective study was designed to assess the effects of recombinant human (r)LH supplementation during GnRH antagonist (cetrorelix) administration. METHODS: The protocol consisted of cycle programming with oral contraceptive pill, ovarian stimulation with rFSH and flexible administration of a single dose of cetrorelix (3 mg). A total of 218 patients from three IVF centres were randomized (by sealed envelopes or according to woman's birth date) to receive (n = 114) or not (n = 104) a daily injection of rLH 75 IU from GnRH antagonist initiation to hCG injection. RESULTS: The only significant difference was a higher serum peak E2 level in patients treated with rLH (1476 +/- 787 versus 1012 +/- 659 pg/ml, P < 0.001) whereas the numbers of oocytes and embryos as well as the delivery rate (25.2 versus 24%) and the implantation rate per embryo (19.1 versus 17.4%) were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that in an unselected group of patients, there is no evident benefit to supplement GnRH antagonist-treated cycles with rLH.     

A randomized single-blind controlled trial of letrozole as a low-cost IVF protocol in women with poor ovarian response: a preliminary report

BACKGROUND: Use of letrozole, a selective inhibitor of aromatase, reduces the gonadotrophin dose required to induce follicular maturation. We evaluated whether incorporation of letrozole could be an effective low-cost IVF protocol for poor responders. METHODS: A randomized, controlled, single-blind trial was conducted in the Assisted Reproduction Unit, Institute of Reproductive Medicine, Kolkata, India. Thirty-eight women with a history of poor ovarian response to gonadotrophins were recruited. Thirteen women (Let-FSH group) received letrozole 2.5 mg daily from day 3-7, and recombinant FSH (rFSH) 75 IU/day on days 3 and 8; and 25 women (GnRH-ag-FSH group) underwent long GnRH agonist protocol and stimulated with rFSH (300-450 IU/day). Ovulation was triggered by 10,000 IU of HCG followed by IVF-embryo transfer. The main outcome measures were total dose of rFSH (IU/cycle), terminal estradiol (E2) (pg/ml), numbers of follicles, oocytes retrieved and transferable embryo, endometrial thickness (mm), and pregnancy rate. RESULTS: Compared with the GnRH-ag-FSH group (2865 +/- 228 IU), the Let-FSH group (150 +/- 0 IU) received a significantly (P < 0.001) lower total dose of FSH. Except for terminal E2, which was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in the GnRH-ag-FSH group (380 +/- 46 pg/ml) than the Let-FSH group (227 +/- 45 pg/ml), the treatment outcomes in all other respects, including pregnancy rate, were statistically comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive use of letrozole may form an effective means of low-cost IVF protocol in poorly responding women.     

Addition of estradiol to progesterone for luteal supplementation in patients stimulated with GnRH antagonist/rFSH for IVF: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The role of progesterone for luteal support in stimulated cycles for IVF is well established. However, controversy still surrounds the benefit of additional supplementation with estradiol (E2) in GnRH agonist (GnRHa) cycles, while no such data are available for GnRH antagonists. The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to compare ongoing pregnancy rates in patients stimulated with recombinant FSH (rFSH) and GnRH antagonist for IVF, who received micronized progesterone for luteal phase supplementation, with or without the addition of E2. METHODS: Two hundred and one patients underwent ovarian stimulation with a fixed dose of 200 IU rFSH and GnRH antagonist. Patients were randomized to receive, for luteal phase supplementation, either 600 mg of micronized progesterone vaginally (n=100, progesterone group) or 600 mg of micronized progesterone and 4 mg of E2 valerate orally (n=101, progesterone/E2 group). The main outcome measure was ongoing pregnancy at 12 weeks per patient randomized. RESULTS: Demographics, stimulation parameters and embryological data were comparable for the two groups compared. Twenty-six ongoing pregnancies were achieved in the progesterone (26%) and 30 in the progesterone/E2 group (29.7%). (Difference: 3.7 and 95%, CI: -15.8 to 8.6%). CONCLUSION: It appears that the addition of E2 to progesterone in the luteal phase after stimulation with rFSH and GnRH antagonist does not enhance the probability of pregnancy.     

Increased risk of early pregnancy loss by profound suppression of luteinizing hormone during ovarian stimulation in normogonadotrophic women undergoing assisted reproduction

The impact of suppressed concentrations of circulating luteinizing hormone (LH) during ovarian stimulation on the outcome of in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment in 200 consecutive, normogonadotrophic women (couples) was analysed retrospectively. A standard stimulation protocol with mid-luteal gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist down-regulation and ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) was used in all cases. Blood was sampled from each woman on stimulation days 1 and 8 for analysis of oestradiol and LH in serum. A threshold value of serum LH of 0.5 IU/l on stimulation day 8 (S8) was chosen to discriminate between women with low or 'normal' LH concentrations. Low concentrations of LH on S8 (<0.5 IU/l) were found in 49% (98/200) of the women. This group of women was comparable with the normal LH group with regard to pre-treatment clinical parameters, and to the parameters characterizing the stimulation protocol with the exception of serum oestradiol concentration, which on S8 was significantly lower than in the normal LH group (P < 0.001). The proportion of positive pregnancy tests was similar in the two groups (30% versus 34% per started cycle), but the final clinical treatment outcome was significantly different, with a five-fold higher risk of early pregnancy loss (45% versus 9%; P < 0.005) in the low LH group and consequently a significantly poorer chance of delivery than in the normal LH group. It is concluded that a substantial proportion of normogonadotrophic women treated with GnRH agonist down-regulation in combination with FSH, devoid of LH activity, experience LH suppression, which compromises the treatment outcome. Whether these women would benefit from supplementation with recombinant LH or human menopausal gonadotrophin during ovarian stimulation, remains to be proven in the future by prospective randomized trials.     

The effectiveness and safety of recombinant human LH to support follicular development induced by recombinant human FSH in WHO group I anovulation: evidence from a multicentre study in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Until recently, human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG), a urinary extract containing a fixed combination of LH and FSH, was the only source of exogenous LH for women with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism undergoing ovulation induction with gonadotrophins. Recombinant human LH (rLH) is now available for clinical use, providing a new treatment option but clinical data on its use are scanty. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of rLH combined with recombinant FSH (rFSH) to induce follicular development and ovulation in World Health Organization (WHO) group I anovulatory women. METHODS: We included in this multicentre study 38 hypogonadotrophic anovulatory (WHO group I) women. Patients received 150 IU/day rFSH and 75 IU/day rLH (with the possibility of dose adjustment) as a single s.c. injection for up to three cycles with a total of 84 treatment cycles. RESULTS: Sufficient follicular growth was observed in 79 (94%) out of 84 initiated cycles. The 75 IU rLH dose was found to be effective in most treatment cycles (94%) and only five cycles in three patients required daily dose increase. Overall, HCG was administered to trigger ovulation in 67 (80%) of the 84 cycles while it was withheld in 12 cycles (14%) due to ovarian hyper-response and five cycles (6%) were cancelled for insufficient follicular growth. The pregnancy rate per started treatment cycle and per cycle given HCG was 18 and 22.4% respectively. Pregnancy was achieved by 15 (39.5%) of the 38 patients. Mild to moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome occurred in three patients. Local tolerance was good. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that combined rFSH and rLH treatment induces follicular growth, ovulation and pregnancy in a good proportion of hypogonadotrophic anovulatory patients and is well tolerated. The doses of 150 IU rFSH and 75 IU rLH daily seem the most appropriate but in a small minority of patients doses >75 IU rLH/day may be necessary.     

Treatment with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone is effective, safe and convenient: results of a controlled, randomized, multicentre trial. The European Orgalutran Study Group

A multicentre, open-label, randomized study of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist ganirelix (Orgalutran((R))/Antagon((TM))) was performed in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH (rFSH: Puregon((R))). The study was designed as a non-inferiority study using a long protocol of buserelin (intranasal) and rFSH as a reference treatment. A total of 730 subjects was randomized in a treatment ratio of 2:1 (ganirelix:buserelin) using an interactive voice response system which stratified for age, type of infertility and planned fertilization procedure [IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)]. The median duration of GnRH analogue treatment was 5 days in the ganirelix group and 26 days in the buserelin group, whereas the median total rFSH dose was 1500 IU and 1800 IU respectively. In addition, in the ganirelix group the mean duration of stimulation was 1 day shorter. During ganirelix treatment the incidence of LH rises (LH >/=10 IU/l) was 2.8% versus 1.3% during rFSH stimulation in the buserelin group. On the day of triggering ovulation by human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), the mean number of follicles >/=11 mm diameter was 10.7 and 11.8, and the median serum oestradiol concentrations were 1190 pg/ml and 1700 pg/ml in the ganirelix and buserelin groups respectively. The mean number of oocytes per retrieval was 9.1 and 10.4 respectively, whereas the mean number of good quality embryos was 3.3 and 3.5 respectively. The fertilization rate was equal in both groups (62.1%), and the same mean number of embryos (2.2) was replaced. The mean implantation rates were 15.7% and 21.8%, and the ongoing pregnancy rates per attempt were 20.3% and 25.7% in the ganirelix and buserelin groups respectively. Evaluation of all safety data indicated that the ganirelix regimen was safe and well tolerated. The overall incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was 2.4% in the ganirelix group and 5.9% in the reference group. The results of this study support a safe, short and convenient treatment regimen of ganirelix, resulting in a good clinical outcome for patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF or ICSI.     

Timing ovulation for intrauterine insemination with a GnRH antagonist

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the efficacy of a GnRH antagonist in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles to increase number of mature ovulatory follicles and pregnancy rates. METHODS: Prospective randomized study. Women (18-38 years old) with primary/secondary infertility were included. Eighty-two patients were randomly assigned to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) consisting of rFSH + GnRH antagonist or rFSH alone. RESULTS: A non-significant increase in the total amount of rFSH was seen in the GnRH antagonist group (707+/-240 IU) with respect to the control group (657+/-194 IU). The number of mature follicles (> or =16 mm) was significantly higher in the GnRH antagonist group than in the control group (2.4+/-1.4 versus 1.7+/-1.2, P<0.05). Pregnancy rates were significantly increased in the group of patients receiving the GnRH antagonist (38%) compared to the control group (14%). The only non-single pregnancy (triplets) occurred in the antagonist group. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study, adding the GnRH antagonist to the COS protocol for IUI cycles significantly increased pregnancy rates. Nevertheless, these results may not be associated directly with the antagonist itself but with the fact that more mature ovulatory follicles are present by the day of the hCG. Finally, the risk for multiple gestations needs to be carefully evaluated.     

A comparative randomized multicentric study comparing the step-up versus step-down protocol in polycystic ovary syndrome

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate follicular development and ovulation comparing the low-dose step-up and the step-down protocols, in women with clomiphene citrate (CC)-resistant polycystic ovaries. METHODS: Eighty-three women were randomized, and treated with recombinant (r) FSH (Puregon) using either the step-up (n=44) or step-down (n=39) protocol. They were followed up for three cycles unless pregnancy occurred. RESULTS: Monofollicular development occurred in 68.2% of the 85 cycles in the step-up group, as compared with 32% of the 72 cycles in the step-down group (P<0.0001). Hyperstimulation was statistically less frequent using the step-up procedure (4.7 versus 36%, P<0.0001). Both protocols used the same number of FSH units per cycle (951+/-586 versus 967+/-458 in step-up and step-down respectively, P=not significant). However, the duration of ovarian stimulation was statistically different (15.2+/-7.0 days in step-up versus 9.7+/-3.1 in step-down, P<0.001). Ovulation was observed in 70.3% of the cycles using the step-up procedure as compared with 51.3% using the step-down procedure (P<0.01). The cumulative rate of clinical gestations during the study did not differ between the two groups (38.6% in the step-up versus 30.8% in the step-down procedure). CONCLUSIONS: The step-up protocol using rFSH (Puregon), is more efficient in obtaining a monofollicular development and ovulation than the step-down protocol, in women with CC-resistant polycystic ovaries. Although the duration of stimulation is longer, the rate of ovarian hyperstimulation is much lower using the step-up protocol.     

LH serum levels during ovarian stimulation as predictors of ovarian response and assisted reproduction outcome in down-regulated women stimulated with recombinant FSH

BACKGROUND: There has been much debate about the effect of 'residual' LH levels in normogonadotrophic women undergoing assisted reproduction with GnRH agonist down-regulation and recombinant FSH ovarian stimulation. The aim of this prospective study, where receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used, was to assess further the usefulness of serum LH levels as predictors of ovarian response, assisted reproduction treatment outcome, and the outcome of pregnancy when measured throughout the ovarian stimulation period in a large cohort of such assisted reproduction treatment women. METHODS: A total of 246 consecutive women undergoing their first cycle of IVF or ICSI treatment were included in this study. Blood samples for hormone analyses were obtained on day S0 (the day when pituitary suppression was evidenced) and every other day from stimulation day 5 (S5) until the day of hCG injection. RESULTS: LH serum levels throughout ovarian stimulation treatment were similar for cancelled (n =32) versus non-cancelled (n = 214) cycles, non-conception (n = 132) versus conception (n = 82) cycles, and ongoing pregnancy (n = 66) versus early pregnancy loss (n = 16) groups. There was no correlation between LH serum levels in non-cancelled cycles and parameters of ovarian response and assisted reproduction treatment outcome. ROC analysis showed that serum LH concentration during ovarian stimulation was unable to discriminate between cancelled and non-cancelled cycles, conception versus non-conception cycles, or early pregnancy loss versus ongoing pregnancy groups. CONCLUSIONS: Serum LH measurements during ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH under pituitary suppression in normogonadotrophic women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment cannot predict ovarian response, IVF/ICSI outcome, implantation, and the outcome of pregnancy. Thus, there is little underlying physiological support for the addition of LH in stimulation protocols if daily doses of an appropriate GnRH agonist (leuprolide or triptorelin having lower potency than buserelin) and a step-down regimen of recombinant FSH administration are used.     

Recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation to recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone induced ovarian hyperstimulation in the GnRH-antagonist multiple-dose protocol

BACKGROUND: Suppression of endogenous LH production by mid-follicular phase GnRH-antagonist administration in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol using recombinant (rec) FSH preparations void of LH activity may potentially affect ovarian response and the outcome of IVF treatment. The present study prospectively assessed the effect of using a combination of recFSH and recLH on ovarian stimulation parameters and treatment outcome in a fixed GnRH-antagonist multiple dose protocol. METHODS: 127 infertile patients with an indication for IVF or ICSI were recruited and randomized (using sealed envelopes) to receive a starting dose of either 150 IU recFSH (follitropin alpha) or 150 IU recFSH plus 75 IU recLH (lutropin alpha) for ovarian hyperstimulation. GnRH-antagonist (Cetrorelix) 0.25 mg was administered daily from stimulation day 6 onwards up to and including the day of the administration of recombinant HCG (chorion gonadotropin alpha). Gonadotropin dose adjustments were allowed from stimulation day 6 onwards, HCG was administered as soon as three follicles > or =18 mm were present. The primary outcome parameter was treatment duration until administration of HCG. RESULTS: Exogenous LH did not shorten the time necessary to reach ovulation induction criteria. Serum estradiol (E(2)) and LH levels were significantly higher on the day of HCG administration in the recLH-supplemented group (1924.7 +/- 1256.4 vs 1488.3 +/- 824.0 pg/ml, P < 0.03), and 2.1 +/- 1.4 vs 1.4 +/- 1.5 IU/l, P < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Except for higher E(2) and LH levels on the day of HCG administration, no positive trend in favour of additional LH was found as defined by treatment outcome parameters.     

A prospective, randomized comparison of two starting doses of recombinant FSH in combination with cetrorelix in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI

BACKGROUND: A prospective randomized study was carried out in two centres to compare the number of oocytes retrieved after two different starting doses of recombinant human FSH (rhFSH) (Gonal-F) in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles using the multiple dose regimen of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cetrorelix (Cetrotide) to prevent induction of the premature LH surge. METHODS: Sixty women were randomized to receive rhFSH 150 IU ('low'), and 60 women to receive rhFSH 225 IU ('high') as the starting dose for the first 5 days of stimulation. From stimulation day 6 and onwards, including the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration, the women received 0.25 mg of cetrorelix as a daily dose. The primary endpoint was the number of oocytes retrieved. RESULTS: The mean number (+/- SD) of oocytes was 9.1 +/- 4.4 and 11.0 +/- 4.6 in the 'low' and 'high' groups respectively (P = 0.024). The mean number of 75 IU ampoules of rhFSH was significantly lower in the 'low' group (23.0 +/- 6.3 versus 30.5 +/- 5.6, P < 0.0001). The ongoing pregnancy rate per started cycle and per embryo transfer were 25.9 and 28.8% versus 25.4 and 26.8% respectively in the 'low' and 'high' rhFSH groups (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: When using a starting dose of 225 IU rhFSH combined with the multiple dose of 0.25 mg cetrorelix from stimulation day 6, significantly more oocytes were obtained than with a starting dose of 150 IU rhFSH.     

A relative reduction in mid-follicular LH concentrations during GnRH agonist IVF/ICSI cycles leads to lower live birth rates

BACKGROUND: The effect of early- and mid-follicular LH concentrations on the ovarian response and pregnancy outcomes was evaluated in women receiving pituitary down-regulation with a GnRH agonist and ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH (rFSH) during IVF/ICSI treatment. METHODS: Blood samples were collected prospectively from 701 cycles (560 patients) of assisted reproduction and analysed retrospectively. On the basis of LH concentrations on stimulation day 7/8, the patients were divided into two groups: LH<1.2 IU/l (n=179) and LH>or=1.2 IU/l (n=522). Cycle outcomes were also compared on the basis of a ratio of mid- to early-follicular LH concentrations (0.5, n=491). RESULTS: Patients with low LH concentrations were found to have a significant reduction in the late-follicular estradiol concentrations (P<0.001), the number of oocytes retrieved (P<0.01) and the number of usable embryos (P<0.01), and they required significantly more rFSH (430 IU difference, P<0.01). These differences did not translate into a significant change in live birth rates. Conversely, a ratio of or=50%) was associated with a significant reduction in live birth rates per embryo transfer and per cycle started (27.3 versus 19.0%, P<0.05 and 22.2 versus 15.8%, P<0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Low mid-follicular levels of LH have a significant impact on ovarian response but not on live birth rates. A fall in LH level of >or=50% from the early- to mid-follicular phase resulted in a lower live birth rate.     

A randomized, double-blind, multicentre clinical trial comparing starting doses of 150 and 200 IU of recombinant FSH in women treated with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix for assisted reproduction

BACKGROUND: Studies with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix in assistedreproduction have indicated that compared with traditional GnRHagonist downregulation protocols, slightly fewer oocytes areretrieved. In this study it was investigated whether an increasein the starting dose of recombinant FSH (rFSH) could compensatefor this loss. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, multicentreclinical trial comparing a starting dose of 150 and 200 IUof rFSH (follitropin ), in women undergoing treatment with theGnRH antagonist ganirelix. RESULTS: In total, 257 women weretreated with rFSH, of whom 131 received 150 IU and 126women 200 IU. Overall, 10.3 oocytes were retrieved in the150 IU group and 11.9 in the 200 IU group (P = 0.051).This difference became significant when women with cycle cancellationbefore HCG administration were excluded. Nearly 500 IUof additional rFSH was given in the high-dose group (2014 versus1541 IU). In the low-dose group, 4.6 high-quality embryoswere obtained compared with 4.5 in the high-dose group. Vitalpregnancy rates were similar (31 and 25% in the 150 and 200 IU-treatedwomen, respectively). Serum concentrations of FSH, estradioland progesterone were significantly higher in the high-dosegroup at day 6 of rFSH treatment and on the day of HCG administration.In the high-dose group, serum LH concentrations were higherat day 6 of rFSH treatment but lower at the day of HCG administration.CONCLUSION: By increasing the starting dose from 150 to 200 IUof rFSH, slightly more oocytes can be retrieved in GnRH antagonistprotocols for assisted reproduction. However, because this didnot translate into a higher number of high quality embryos,the clinical relevance of such a dose increase may be questioned.     

A comparative randomized trial to assess the impact of oral contraceptive pretreatment on follicular growth and hormone profiles in GnRH antagonist-treated patients

BACKGROUND: This randomized controlled trial was designed to assess the impact of oral contraceptive (OC) scheduling with a GnRH antagonist (ganirelix) regimen on the ovarian response of women undergoing recombinant FSH (rFSH) stimulation for IVF, compared with a non-scheduled ganirelix regimen and a long GnRH agonist (nafarelin) protocol. METHODS: A total of 110 women was treated with an OC and ganirelix, 111 with ganirelix alone and 111 with nafarelin. The OC (containing 30 microg ethinylestradiol/150 microg desogestrel) was taken for 14-28 days and stopped 2 days prior to the start of rFSH treatment. Primary efficiency parameters were the number of cumulus-oocyte complexes (per attempt) and the number of grade 1 or 2 embryos (per attempt). RESULTS: In terms of follicular growth and hormone profiles, the OC-scheduled antagonist regimen mimicked the agonist regimen rather than the (non-scheduled) GnRH antagonist regimen. In the OC-scheduled GnRH antagonist group and the nafarelin group (versus the non-scheduled antagonist group), pituitary suppression was more profound at the start of stimulation (P < or = 0.001), there was a slower start of follicular growth (P < or = 0.001), longer stimulation was required (11.7 and 10.3 days respectively versus 9.4; P < or = 0.001), and more rFSH was used (2667 and 2222 IU versus 1966 IU; P < or = 0.001). In the three groups, the number of oocytes was similar (13.1, 12.9 and 11.5 respectively; not significant) as well as the number of good quality embryos (5.1, 5.7 and 5.0 respectively; not significant). CONCLUSION: OC treatment prior to the rFSH/ganirelix regimen can be successfully applied to schedule patients, although more days of stimulation and more rFSH are required than with a non-scheduled GnRH antagonist regimen.     

A randomized, double-blind clinical trial using fixed daily doses of 100 or 200 IU of recombinant FSH in ICSI cycles

The effect of 100 and 200 IU per day recombinant FSH (rFSH) on numbers of oocytes retrieved and the total dose used in ovarian stimulation before intracytoplasmic sperm injection was investigated in a double-blind, randomized multicentre trial. A total of 91 women was treated with a low-dose protocol and 88 with a high-dose regimen at five centres. For each started cycle, significantly more oocytes were retrieved in the 200 IU group than in 100 IU group (12.0 versus 5.7, P < 0.001); total rFSH consumption was 1121 and 1875 IU in the low- and high-dose groups respectively. Significant variations were noted between centres with regard to numbers of oocytes collected per started cycle, ranging from 2.8 to 7.2 in the 100 IU group and from 9.0 to 19.1 in the high-dose group. Exploratory analyses of secondary outcomes suggested there were no differences in vital pregnancy rates per started cycle (19.2 versus 16.9%) and per embryo transfer (26.2 versus 19.3%) in the low- and high dose groups respectively. There were four hospitalizations due to ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, all in the 200 IU group.     

Effect of recombinant human gonadotrophins on human, bovine and murine oocyte meiosis, fertilization and embryonic development in vitro

The response of murine, bovine and human oocytes to pure recombinant preparations of human follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) and luteinizing hormone (rLH) for meiotic maturation and subsequent developmental competence in vitro were examined in the present experiments. Maturation of immature bovine oocytes to the metaphase II stage was significantly increased by the addition of 1 IU/ml of rFSH in combination with either 1 IU/ml rLH or 10 IU/ml rLH. Similarly, embryonic development to the blastocyst stage was improved in bovine oocytes treated with a 1:10 combination of rFSH:rLH. However, no significant difference was observed in the number of inner cell mass or trophectoderm cells of the resulting blastocysts. Although the increased maturation to metaphase II was not significant, human embryonic developmental competence was improved by maturing oocytes in the presence of a 1:10 ratio of rFSH:rLH as only those oocytes exposed to a 1:10 ratio of rFSH: rLH during maturation showed normal cleavage patterns beyond day 2. In addition, 1 IU/ml rFSH and 1 IU/ml rLH increased the expression of oocyte proteins in human oocytes. The inclusion of recombinant gonadotrophins, either singly or in combination, had no significant effect on the maturation, fertilization or embryonic development of in-vitro matured mouse oocytes. These data provide support for the responsiveness of human and bovine oocytes to gonadotrophins in vitro and the need to consider variations in the relative concentrations for optimization of oocyte developmental competence.