Neuromotor control during stair ambulation in individuals with patellofemoral osteoarthritis compared to asymptomatic controls

BackgroundPatellofemoral OA is characterized by PF pain during activities that load a flexed knee. Stair stepping ability is frequently impaired, yet little is known of the muscular recruitment strategies utilized during this task. Altered recruitment strategies may provide targets for clinical interventions. We aimed to determine if people with PFOA ascend and descend stairs with different muscular recruitment strategies compared to similar aged healthy individuals.MethodsTwenty-two people with PFOA and 20 controls were recruited. Electromyographic recordings from gluteus maximus and medius, medial and lateral hamstrings, vastus medialis and lateralis, medial and lateral gastrocnemius and soleus were acquired during stair ascent and descent. Force plate data was acquired to determine timing of foot placements and characterize dynamic stability.ResultsSeventeen people with PFOA (59 ± 10 years, 73 ± 13 kg, 167 ± 9 cm) and 15 controls (57 ± 10 years, 73 ± 16 kg, 171 ± 11 cm) had complete data. People with PFOA demonstrated: longer vastii activation duration during descent (lateralis: p = 0.01; medialis: p = 0.02); earlier onset of vastus lateralis for ascent (p < 0.01) and descent (p = 0.04); earlier onset of soleus in descent (p = 0.04); and shorter duration of GMax during ascent (p = 0.05). Peak Fz timing (time between the start of the anticipatory postural adjustment and the end of the stepping task) was ∼70ms later during stair descent in PFOA compared to controls (p = 0.01).SignificancePeople with PFOA utilize muscular activation strategies consistent with minimizing knee pain during stair ambulation. Clinical interventions aimed at gluteal and quadriceps activation may be warranted in PFOA.     

Influence of the exacerbation of patellofemoral pain on trunk kinematics and lower limb mechanics during stair negotiation

BackgroundAlthough it is assumed that the presence of patellofemoral pain (PFP) may result in compensatory behaviors that can alter trunk kinematics and lower limb mechanics, the influence of the exacerbation of patellofemoral pain on trunk kinematics and lower limb mechanics during stair negotiation has not been established.Research questionDoes the exacerbation of PFP symptoms lead to altered trunk kinematics and lower limb mechanics during stair negotiation?MethodsThree-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were obtained from 45 women with PFP during stair descent and ascent. Data were obtained before and after a pain exacerbation protocol. The variables of interest were peak trunk, hip, and knee flexion, and ankle dorsiflexion; peak hip, and knee extensor, and ankle plantarflexor moments. Paired t-tests were used to compare the variables of interest before and after pain exacerbation.ResultsFollowing pain exacerbation, there was a decrease in peak knee extensor moment during stair descent (Effect size = −0.68; p = 0.01) and stair ascent (Effect size = −0.56; p = 0.02); as well as in peak ankle dorsiflexion during stair descent (Effect size = −0.33; p = 0.01) and stair ascent (Effect size = −0.30; p = 0.01). An increase in ankle plantarflexor moment during stair descent (Effect size = 0.79; p < 0.01) and stair ascent (Effect size = 0.89; p < 0.01) was also observed. No significant differences were observed for peak trunk, hip, and knee flexion or hip extensor moment (p > 0.05).SignificanceOur findings show compensatory strategies used by people with PFP in response to symptoms exacerbation that may have a negative impact on knee and ankle mechanics. Our findings also suggest that people with PFP do not seem to change their trunk, hip, and knee flexion or hip extensor moment during stair negotiation in response to symptom exacerbation.     

Influence of load and carrying methods on gait phase and ground reactions in children's stair walking

The study investigated the effects of carrying methods and loads on gait phase and ground reaction force during stair ascent and descent in children. The carrying methods that were examined included the backpack and one-strap athletic bag. The load weights included 0%, 10%, 15%, and 20% of body weight. Thirteen school children aged 12.21 +/- 0.98 years were recruited as subjects. A Novel Pedar System was used to record and analyze the insole pressure during stair walking with different loads. The load that caused a significant increase in the peak force in each bag and stair mode was 15% of body weight, except for stair ascent carrying the athletic bag, where the load was 10% of body weight. The maximum peak force that was induced by this load in stair descent was 1.25 times that in descent with no load, 1.89 times that in ascent with the same load, and 2.19 times that in ascent with no load. The force-to-time ratio in descent was about three times that in ascent.     

Influence of light handrail use on the biomechanics of stair negotiation in old age

The high incidence of falls in older adults during stair negotiation suggests that this task is physically challenging and potentially dangerous. The present study aimed to examine the influence of light handrail use on the biomechanics of stair negotiation in old age. Thirteen older adults ascended and descended a purpose-built staircase at their self-selected speed: (i) unaided and (ii) with light use of the handrails. Ground reaction forces (GRFs) were measured from force platforms mounted into each step and motion capture was used to collect kinematic data. Knee and ankle joint moments were calculated using the kinetic and kinematic data. The horizontal separation between the centre of mass (COM) and the centre of pressure (COP) was assessed in the sagittal and frontal planes. During stair ascent, handrail use caused a different strategy to be employed compared to unaided ascent with a redistribution of joint moments. Specifically, the ankle joint moment (of the trailing leg) was reduced with handrail use, which has previously been shown to approach its limits during unaided stair ascent, but the knee joint moment (of the leading leg) increased. Previous research has shown that a larger joint moment reserve is available at the knee during unaided stair ascent. During stair descent, the ankle joint moment increased with handrail use, this was associated, however, with a more effective control of balance as shown by a reduced COM-COP separation in the direction of progression compared to unaided descent. These results indicate that although the biomechanical mechanisms are different for stair ascent and descent, the safety of stair negotiation is improved for older adults with light use of the handrails.     

Kinetic analysis of forwards and backwards stair descent

The activity of descending stairs increases loading at the joints of the lower extremities as compared to walking, which may cause discomfort and or difficulties in completing the task. This study compared and contrasted the kinematics and kinetics of both forwards and backwards stair descent to those of level walking. We compared the support moments and moment powers of the lower limb joints while descending stairs forwards at a self-selected pace, backwards at a self-selected pace and forwards at the same pace as backwards. Participants were 10 healthy young adults (6 men and 4 women) aged 20–35 years. Sagittal plane kinematics and ground reaction forces were collected and moments of force computed using inverse dynamics. The ratio of stance/swing phase changed from 59:41 for normal level walking to between 65:35 and 70:30 for forward stair descent but backwards descent was 58:42. Stair descent produced larger double-peak support moments with reduced ankle plantar flexor and increased knee extensor moments as compared to level walking (>±95th-percentile confidence interval). The hip moments during stair descent were relatively small and highly variable. We observed significantly larger distances between the centres of pressure and the stair edges for backwards stair descent versus forwards stair descent. These results demonstrate that stair descent, even at a slower pace, requires greater power from the knee extensors than level walking but that backwards stair descent significantly reduced the peak knee power during midstance and provided a potentially safer means of descending stairs than forwards stair descent.     

Lower extremity kinematics and kinetics during level walking and stair climbing in subjects with triple arthrodesis or subtalar fusion

The purpose of this study was to identify the kinematic and kinetic strategies used by patients with unilateral triple arthrodesis or subtalar fusion during level walking, stair ascent, stair descent and to determine the influence of these different conditions on kinematics and kinetics. Nine subjects with unilateral triple or subtalar fusion and five normal control subjects were recruited for this experiment. Temporal distance, kinematic and kinetic data were collected using a six camera 3-D motion analysis system and a custom fabricated set of stairs with five steps; the second and third steps were each instrumented with one force platform. During level walking, affected limbs lost all of the plantarflexion at the ankle joint during push-off and showed greater knee flexion angle during the same period of stance. During stair ascent, affected limbs showed a different movement pattern at the knee, a greater knee flexion angle during the whole stance phase and a near zero degree of plantarflexion angle during the forward continuance (FCN) phase. During descent, affected limbs showed a greater knee flexion angle during the whole stance phase and less ankle dorsiflexion angle during the same period of stance phase. At the ankle, peak moment and power values were significantly different between the affected side and the limbs of the control subjects during level walking in the push-off phase, stair ascent in the FCN phase, and stair descent in the weight acceptance (WA) phase, where the affected limbs had a lower plantarflexion moment and power values.     

Heel height affects lower extremity frontal plane joint moments during walking

Wearing high heels alters walking kinematics and kinetics and can create potentially adverse effects on the body. Our purpose was to determine how heel height affects frontal plane joint moments at the hip, knee, and ankle, with a specific focus on the knee moment due to its importance in joint loading and knee osteoarthritis. 15 women completed overground walking using three different heel heights (1, 5, and 9 cm) for fixed speed (1.3 ms(-1)) and preferred speed conditions while kinematic and force platform data were collected concurrently. For both fixed and preferred speeds, peak internal knee abduction moment increased systematically as heel height increased (fixed: 0.46, 0.48, 0.55 N m kg(-1); preferred: 0.47, 0.49, 0.53 N m kg(-1)). Heel height effects on net frontal plane moments of the hip and ankle were similar to those for the knee; peak joint moments increased as heel height increased. The higher peak internal knee abduction moment with increasing heel height suggests greater medial loading at the knee. Kinetic changes at the ankle with increasing heel height may also contribute to larger medial loads at the knee. Overall, wearing high heels, particularly those with higher heel heights, may put individuals at greater risk for joint degeneration and developing medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.     

Crossover study of amputee stair ascent and descent biomechanics using Genium and C-Leg prostheses with comparison to non-amputee control

This study was a randomized crossover of stair ambulation of Transfemoral Amputees (TFAs) using the Genium and C-Leg prosthetic knees. TFAs typically have difficulty ascending and descending stairs, limiting community mobility. The objective of this study was to determine the relative efficacy of the Genium and C-Leg prostheses for stair ascent and descent, and their absolute efficacy relative to non-amputees. Twenty TFAs, and five non-amputees participated in the study. TFAs were randomized to begin the study with the Genium or C-Leg prosthesis. Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection and the study was listed on clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT01473662). After fitting, accommodation, and training, participants were asked to demonstrate their preferred gait pattern for stair ascent and descent and a step-over-step pattern if able. TFAs then switched prosthetic legs and repeated fitting, accommodation, training, and testing. An eight camera Vicon optical motion analysis system, and two AMTI force plates were used to track and analyze the participants’ gait patterns, knee flexion angles, knee moment normalized by body weight, and swing time. For stair descent, no significant differences were found between prostheses. For stair ascent, Genium use resulted in: increased ability to use a step-over-step gait pattern (p = 0.03), increased prosthetic side peak knee flexion (p < 0.01), and increased swing duration (p < 0.01). Changes in contralateral side outcomes and in knee moment were not significant. Overall the Genium knee decreased deficiency in gait patterns for stair ascent relative to the C-Leg, by enabling gait patterns that more closely resembled non-amputees.     

Stair ascent and descent at different inclinations.

The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanics and motor co-ordination in humans during stair climbing at different inclinations. Ten normal subjects ascended and descended a five-step staircase at three different inclinations (24 degrees, 30 degrees, 42 degrees ). Three steps were instrumented with force sensors and provided 6 dof ground reactions. Kinematics was analysed by a camera-based optoelectronic system. An inverse dynamics approach was applied to compute joint moments and powers. The different kinematic and kinetic patterns of stair ascent and descent were analysed and compared to level walking patterns. Temporal gait cycle parameters and ground reactions were not significantly affected by staircase inclination. Joint angles and moments showed a relatively low but significant dependency on the inclination. A large influence was observed in joint powers. This can be related to the varying amount of potential energy that has to be produced (during ascent) or absorbed (during descent) by the muscles. The kinematics and kinetics of staircase walking differ considerably from level walking. Interestingly, no definite signs could be found indicating that there is an adaptation or shift in the motor patterns when moving from level to stair walking. This can be clearly seen in the foot placement: compared to level walking, the forefoot strikes the ground first--independent from climbing direction and inclination. This and further findings suggest that there is a certain inclination angle or angular range where subjects do switch between a level walking and a stair walking gait pattern.     

The effect of training on running economy and performance in recreational athletes

PURPOSE: To analyze the effect of an 8-wk training program on the energy cost of running (C) and the performance of 16 recreational males. METHODS: A training group (TG, N = 8, 25.3 +/- 2.9 yr, 183.6 +/- 7.3 cm, 80.9 +/- 9.6 kg) and a control group (CG, N = 8, 24.3 +/- 3.7 yr, 179.3 +/- 6.1 cm, 75.5 +/- 8.0 kg) performed three two-stage tests (TST) at weeks 0, 4, and 8 (W0, W4, W8). Speeds of the first (v-slow) and second stage (v-fast) were 2.4 +/- 0.3 vs 2.5 +/- 0.4 m x s(-1) and 3.7 +/- 0.3 vs 3.9 +/- 0.4 m.s (TG vs CG), respectively. Maximum running time at v-fast (T) served as the measure of performance. C was calculated from oxygen uptake above rest, blood lactate concentration, and speed. The TG trained 3-5x wk(-1) at an HR of +/-10 beats of the HR measured at v-slow at W0 (161 +/- 12 bpm). The CG did not train. RESULTS: At W0, there were no significant differences between the groups in T (377 +/- 47 vs 335 +/- 34 s) and C (v-slow: 4.1 +/- 0.3 vs 4.3 +/- 0.4 J x kg(-1) x m(-1); v-fast: 4.2 +/- 0.4 vs 4.0 +/- 0.4 J x kg(-1) x m(-1)). In the CG, T and C remained almost unchanged at W4 (363 +/- 38 s, 4.0 +/- 0.4 J x kg(-1) x m(-1)) and at W8 (342 +/- 49 s, 4.0 +/- 0.3 J x kg(-1) x m(-1)). In the TG, T increased (P < 0.05) at W4 (469 +/- 45 s) and at W8 (591 +/- 109 s). At v-fast, also C increased (P < 0.05) at W8 (4.6 +/- 0.4 J x kg(-1) x m(-1)), whereas at v-slow, C decreased (P < 0.05) at W4 (3.7 +/- 0.4 J x kg(-1) x m(-1)) with no further change at W8 (3.7 +/- 0.4 J x kg(-1) x m(-1)). CONCLUSION: The training successfully increased running performance in terms of T. During the initial training period, C could be reduced at the speed predominantly used in training. However, at high running speeds, C may even increase if the corresponding running time is largely increased.     

Ground reaction forces on stairs: effects of stair inclination and age

The goals of the study were to compare data of vertical ground reaction force (GRF) parameters during level walking, stair ascent and descent on three different stair inclinations and three different age groups. Twenty healthy subjects of three age groups (young 33.7 years; middle 63.6 years; old 76.5 years) were tested during the seven test conditions with 8-10 repetitions. Vertical forces were measured during two consecutive steps with force plates embedded in the walkway and the staircase. The results showed that during level walking the vertical GRF curves were very regular and repetitive, the trail-to-trial variability and left-right asymmetry of defined test parameters being around 2-5% and 3-5%. During stair ascent the vertical GRF force pattern was found to change slightly compared to level gait, but considerably compared to stair descent. On the steep stair the average vertical load increased up to 1.6 BW, and variability (5-10%) and asymmetry (5-15%) were increased significantly. The steep stair descent condition was found to be the most demanding test showing the largest variability and asymmetry and thus, the least stable gait pattern. Age was found to be a factor which should be considered, because the young age group walked faster and produced larger vertical GRF maxima during level walking and on stair ascent than the middle and old age group. Differences between the middle and old age group were found to be small. The present investigation is the first to provide normative data of GRF parameters on gait variability and symmetry of two consecutive steps during level gait and stair ambulation. It is the intention that the results of this study may be used as a basis for comparison with patient data.     

Sagittal and frontal lower limb joint moments during stair ascent and descent in young and older adults

Stair negotiation is an essential skill required for independent mobility, and is described by older adults as a challenging task that is associated with high fall risk. Little is known about the age-related changes in joint kinetics and the relative contribution of lower limb joint moments during stair negotiation. This study characterized lower extremity joint kinetics and their variability associated with stair ascent and descent in young and older adults. Twenty three young and 32 older adults (>55 years) participated. Three dimensional, bilateral gait analysis provided ankle, knee, and hip moment profiles, which in the sagittal plane were summed to provide the support moment. In addition, intra- and inter-subject coefficients of variation were calculated for ensemble averaged curves. Age-related differences were found in the magnitudes of the moment contributions during event transitions for stair ascent and descent. Within groups, the moment profiles were generally consistent. Ankle and knee moments predominantly contributed to extensor support in the sagittal plane. In the frontal plane, proximal joint abductor moments maintained lateral stability and were larger at the hip in older adults. Understanding age-related alterations in movement control during functional tasks can help inform the rehabilitation management and assessment of patient populations.     

Effect of bracing on patellofemoral joint stress while ascending and descending stairs.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that individuals who respond favorably to bracing will exhibit decreased patellofemoral joint stress during stair ambulation. DESIGN: A repeated-measures, cross-sectional study. BACKGROUND: Ascending and descending stairs is one of the most painful activities of daily living for persons with patellofemoral pain (PFP). Although patellar bracing has been shown to reduce symptoms during such tasks, the underlying mechanism has not been identified. METHODS: Fifteen subjects with a diagnosis of PFP completed 2 phases of data collection: (1) magnetic resonance imaging to determine patellofemoral joint contact area, and (2) gait analysis during stair ascent and descent. Data were obtained under braced and non-braced conditions. Variables obtained from both data collection sessions were used as input variables into a biomechanical model to quantify patellofemoral joint stress. RESULTS: Although subjects reported an average decrease in pain of 56%, bracing did not reduce peak stress during stair ascent and descent. This finding can be explained by the fact that despite improvements in contact area, bracing resulted in greater knee extensor muscle moments and joint reaction forces. CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not support the hypothesis that individuals with PFP would demonstrate reduced patellofemoral stress during stair ambulation following the application of a patellar brace. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although bracing did not decrease patellofemoral joint stress during stair ascent and descent, the decrease in pain, increase in quadriceps utilization, and tolerance of joint reaction forces would appear to be beneficial consequences of bracing.     

Knee and hip kinetics during normal stair climbing

Understanding joint kinetics during activities of daily living furthers our understanding of the factors involved in joint pathology and the effects of treatment. In this study, we examined hip and knee joint kinetics during stair climbing in 35 young healthy subjects using a subject-specific knee model to estimate bone-on-bone tibiofemoral and patello-femoral joint contact forces. The net knee forces were below one body weight while the peak posterior-anterior contact force was close to one body weight. The peak distal-proximal contact force was on average 3 times body weight and could be as high as 6 times body weight. These contact forces occurred at a high degree of knee flexion where there is a smaller joint contact area resulting in high contact stresses. The peak knee adduction moment was 0.42 (0.15) Nm/kg while the flexion moment was 1.16 (0.24) Nm/kg. Similar peak moment values, but different curve profiles, were found for the hip. The hip and knee posterior-anterior shear forces and the knee flexion moment were higher during stair climbing than during level walking. The most striking difference between stair ascent and level walking was that the peak patello-femoral contact force was 8 times higher during stair ascent. These data can be used as baseline measures in pathology studies, as input to theoretical joint models, and as input to mechanical joint simulators.     

Clinically meaningful change in stair negotiation performance in older adults

Stair negotiation is a key marker for independence among older adults; however, clinically meaningful change has not been established. Our objective was to establish the values of clinically meaningful change in stair negotiation time using distribution- and anchor-based approaches. Study participants were 371 community residing older adults (age≥70) in the Einstein Aging Study with time to ascend and descend 3 steps measured at baseline and at one-year follow-up. Anchor-based estimates were obtained using functional decline (defined as one-point increment in disability score) and change in self-reported walking ability over the one-year follow-up period. Small, moderate, and large meaningful change estimates were 0.28, 0.71, and 1.15 s for stair ascent time (0.31, 0.78, and 1.25 s for stair descent time) using the distribution-based approach of effect size. The estimates of meaningful decline range from 0.47 to 0.53 s for stair ascent time (0.33-0.53 s for stair descent time) using the anchor-based approach. The estimates of meaningful improvement were smaller (0.13-0.18 s for stair ascent, 0.06-0.15 for stair descent) compared to those for decline. Based on general consistency between distribution- and anchor-based approaches, preliminary criteria suggested for stair negotiation time is 0.5 s for meaningful decline and 0.2 s for meaningful improvement.     

Biomechanical analysis of stair ambulation in lower limb amputees

Lower extremity amputees have to cope with many activities in everyday life that are substantially more difficult than walking on level ground, and such demands require a high degree of functionality from their prosthetic components. The present study is a biomechanical evaluation (kinematics, kinetics and EMG) of stair ascent and descent in a group of eight transtibial amputees (mean (standard deviation): age 51(14) years, height 176(7)cm, mass 88(19)kg); a group of 12 transfemoral amputees (age 37(8) years, height 182(7)cm, mass 83(7)kg) fitted with the electronically controlled C-LEG knee joint system; and a group of 12 able bodied persons (age 30(10) years, height 174(12)cm, mass 69(12)kg). During stair descent the transfemoral amputees presented a strong reduction of the prosthetic ankle moments (0.11Nm/kg) compared to transtibial amputees (0.93Nm/kg) and control subjects (1.26Nm/kg). Loading of the prosthetic knee joint in the transfemoral amputees more closely resembles the loading seen in the control population when compared to transtibial amputees (mean maximum flexion moment: controls 1.31Nm/kg, transfemoral amputees 1.00Nm/kg, transtibial amputees 0.50Nm/kg). Overload of the contralateral limb is more prominent in the transfemoral amputee than in the transtibial amputee. During stair ascent, the transtibial amputee presents a significant reduction of the knee flexion moment compared to the controls (mean maximum flexion moment: transtibial amputees 0.28Nm/kg, controls 1.31Nm/kg). These differences correlate with a change in the muscle activity of the knee extensor and hamstring muscles. The results also show adaptations in motor strategies during stair negotiation, for those with the partial loss of a lower limb due to the functional limits of current prosthetic components. The present data may contribute to a further enhancement of the efficiency of prosthetic feet and knee joints.     

Test–retest reliability of vertical ground reaction forces during stair climbing in the elderly population

The purpose of the study was to determine the reliability of vertical ground reaction force (VGRF) parameters during stair ascent and descent in the elderly. Forty-two elderly subjects (80.1 SD 6.4 years) were asked to perform three stair ascents and descents at their self-selected normal speed. VGRF were measured during two consecutive steps on an instrumented staircase. Force–time curves where then parameterized into force, force-time and time variables, according to a previously suggested protocol. In addition, force and force-time variables were normalized to body weight. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) type (2, 1) and coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated. Force variables showed moderate to good reliability for the normalized values with ICCs ranging from 0.537 to 0.836 and CVs between 2.52% and 6.51%. Variability of Fmax1 and Fmin appeared to be higher in stair descent with CVs of >5.20% as compared to stair ascent (<3.75%). Time variables showed good reliability in stair ascent but were clearly lower in stair descent (ICCs between 0.108 and 0.684 and CVs between 10.70% and 14.45%). Significant differences were found for the ICCs between the absolute and normalized values as well as for the ICCs of the time dependent and CVs of all variables between stair ascent and descent.It has been concluded that VGRF parameters can be used as a reliable measurement tool for the quantification of stair climbing in the elderly. The present data can be further used as reference values in future investigations.     

Alterations in medial-lateral postural control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during stair use

BackgroundDynamic postural control during everyday tasks is poorly understood in people following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Understanding dynamic postural control can provide insight into potentially modifiable impairments in people following ACLR who are at increased risk for second ACL injury and/or knee osteoarthritis.Research questionDetermine whether measures indicative of dynamic postural control differ between individuals with and without ACLR during stair ascent and descent. Methods: Seventeen individuals with ACLR (>1 yr post-surgery) and 16 age and sex-matched healthy controls participated. Centre of pressure (COP) measures included: i) COP excursion, ii) COP velocity, and iii) dynamic time-toboundary (TTB). Mixed linear models were used to compare COP measures for the ACLR leg, non-ACLR leg, and healthy controls during stair ascent and stair descent.ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences observed during stair ascent (all p > 0.05). Several statistical differences were found during stair descent for individual with ACLR, but not between those with ACLR and healthy controls. The ACLR leg had higher medial-lateral COP excursion (mean difference 1.06 cm, [95 %CI 0.08–2.06 cm], p = 0.036; effect size = 0.38) compared to the non-ACLR leg during stair descent. In addition, the ACLR leg had a lower medial-lateral TTB (mean difference −13 ms [95 %CI −38 to 2 ms], p = 0.005; effect size = 0.49) and medial-lateral TTB normalized to stance time (mean difference −5.8 % [95 %CI −10.3 to 1.3 %], p = 0.012; effect size = 0.80) compared to the non-ACLR leg during stair descent. No statistical differences were observed for anterior-posterior measures during stair descent (all p > 0.05). Significance: Taken together, findings indicate that there are small to large differences in medial-lateral postural control in the ACLR leg compared to the non-ACLR leg during stair descent. Further work is required to understand clinical implication of these novel observations.     

The effects of increased forward trunk lean during stair ascent on hip adduction and internal rotation in asymptomatic females

BackgroundIncreased hip adduction and internal rotation can lead to excessive patellofemoral joint stress and contribute to patellofemoral pain development. The gluteus maximus acts as a hip extensor, abductor, and external rotator. Improving hip extensor use by increasing one’s forward trunk lean in the sagittal plane may improve frontal and transverse plane hip kinematics during stair ascent.Research questionDoes increasing forward trunk lean during stair ascent affect peak hip adduction and internal rotation?MethodsTwenty asymptomatic females performed five stair ascent trials (96 steps/min) on an instrumented stair using their self-selected and forward trunk lean postures. Three-dimensional kinematics (200 Hz) and kinetics (2000 Hz) were recorded during the stance phase of stair ascent. Biomechanical dependent variables were calculated during the stance phase of stair ascent and included peak forward trunk lean, hip flexion, hip adduction, hip internal rotation angles, and the average hip extensor moment.ResultsDuring the forward trunk lean condition, decreases were observed for peak hip adduction (MD = 2.8˚; 95% CI = 1.9, 3.8; p < 0.001) and peak hip internal rotation (MD = 1.1˚; 95% CI = 0.1, 2.2; p = 0.04). In contrast, increases were observed during the forward trunk lean condition for the peak forward trunk lean angle (MD = −34.7˚; 95% CI = −39.1, −30.3; p < 0.001), average hip extensor moment (MD = −0.5 N·m/kg; 95% CI = −0.5, −0.4; p < 0.001), and stance time duration (MD = −0.02 s; 95% CI = −0.04, 0.00; p = 0.017).SignificanceIncreasing forward trunk lean and hip extensor use during stair ascent decreased peak hip adduction and internal rotation in asymptomatic females. Future studies should examine the effects of increasing forward trunk lean on hip kinematics, self-reported pain, and function in individuals with patellofemoral pain.     

Kinematics and kinetics with an adaptive ankle foot system during stair ambulation of transtibial amputees

Conventional prosthetic feet cannot adapt to specific conditions such as walking on stairs or ramps. Amputees are therefore forced to compensate their prosthetic deficits by modifying the kinematics and kinetics of their lower limbs. The Proprio-Foot™ (Ossur) intends to reduce these compensation mechanisms by automatically increasing dorsiflexion during stair ambulation thanks to an adaptive microprocessor-controlled ankle. The present investigation proposes to analyze the biomechanical effects of the dorsiflexion adaptation in transtibial (TT) amputees during stair ambulation.Sixteen TT amputees and sixteen healthy controls underwent conventional 3D gait analysis. Kinematics and kinetics of the lower limbs were compared during stair ascent and descent performed by patients with the prosthetic foot set to a neutral ankle angle and with an adapted dorsiflexion ankle angle of 4°. Norm distance as well as minimum and maximal values of sagittal kinematics and kinetics were calculated for comparisons between patients and control subjects.For both stair ascent and descent, an improvement of the knee kinematics and kinetics could particularly be noticed on the involved side with an increase of the knee flexion and an increase of the knee moment during stance.Therefore, despite its additional weight compared to a conventional prosthetic ankle, the Proprio-Foot™ should be beneficial to active TT amputees whose knee musculature strength does not constitute a handicap.