Low-dose CT urography using deep learning image reconstruction: a prospective study for comparison with conventional CT urography

Objectives:To compare the image quality of low-dose CT urography (LD-CTU) using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) with conventional CTU (C-CTU) using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V).Methods:This was a prospective, single-institutional study using the excretory phase CTU images for analysis. Patients were assigned to the LD-DLIR group (100kV and automatic mA modulation for noise index (NI) of 23) and C-ASIR-V group (100kV and NI of 10) according to the scan protocols in the excretory phase. Two radiologists independently assessed the overall image quality, artifacts, noise and sharpness of urinary tracts. Additionally, the mean CT attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) in the urinary tracts were evaluated.Results:26 patients each were included in the LD-DLIR group (10 males and 16 females; mean age: 57.23 years, range: 33–76 years) and C-ASIR-V group (14 males and 12 females; mean age: 60 years, range: 33–77 years). LD-DLIR group used a significantly lower effective radiation dose compared with the C-ASIR-V group (2.01 ± 0.44 mSv vs 6.9 ± 1.46 mSv, p < 0.001). LD-DLIR group showed good overall image quality with average score >4 and was similar to that of the C-ASIR-V group. Both groups had adequate and similar attenuation value, SNR and CNR in most segments of urinary tracts.Conclusion:It is feasibility to provide comparable image quality while reducing 71% radiation dose in low-dose CTU with a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm compared to the conventional CTU with ASIR-V.Advances in knowledge:(1) CT urography with deep learning reconstruction algorithm can reduce the radiation dose by 71% while still maintaining image quality.     

Dose levels at coronary CT angiography��a comparison of Dual Energy-, Dual Source- and 16-slice CT

Purpose

To compare the dose estimates and image quality of Dual Energy CT (DECT), Dual Source CT (DSCT) and 16-slice CT for coronary CT angiography (cCTA).

Methods

Sixty-eight patients were examined with 16 - slice MDCT (group 1), 68 patients with DSCT (group 2) and 68 patients using DSCT in dual energy mode (DECT group 3). CT dose index volume, dose length product, effective dose, signal-to-noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio were compared. Subjective image quality was rated by two observers, blinded to technique.

Results

The mean estimated radiation dose of all patients investigated on a 16 - slice MDCT was 12?±?3.59?mSv, for DSCT in single energy 9.8?±?4.77?mSv and for DECT 4.54?±?1.87?mSv. Dose for CTA was significantly lower in group 3 compared to group 1 and 2. The image noise was significantly lower in Group 2 in comparison to group 1 and group 3. There was no significant difference in diagnostic image quality comparing DECT and DSCT.

Conclusion

cCTA shows better dose levels at both DECT and DSCT compared to 16-slice CT. Further, DECT delivers significantly less dose than regular DSCT or single source single energy cCTA while maintaining diagnostic image quality.     

Comparison of virtual non-contrast dual-energy CT and a true non-contrast CT for contouring in radiotherapy of 3D printed lung tumour models in motion: a phantom study

Objectives:This work aims to investigate whether virtual non-contrast (VNC) dual-energy CT(DECT) of contrasted lung tumours can be used as an alternative for true non-contrast (TNC) images in radiotherapy. Two DECT techniques and a TNC CT were compared and influences on gross tumour volume (GTV) volume and CT number from motion artefacts in three-dimensional printed lung tumour models (LTM) in amotion phantom were examined.Methods:Two spherical LTMs (diameter 3.0 cm) with different inner shapes were created in a three-dimensional printer. The inner shapes contained water or iodine (concentration 5 mg ml⁻¹) and were scanned with a dual-source DECT (ds-DECT), single-source sequential DECT (ss-DECT) and TNC CT in a respiratory motion phantom (15 breaths/min, amplitude 1.5 cm). CT number and volume of LTMs were measured. Therefore, two GTVs were contoured.Results:Deviations in GTV volume (outer shape) of LTMs in motion for contrast-enhanced ss-DECT and ds-DECT VNC images compared to TNC images are not significant (p > 0.05). Relative GTV volume and CT number deviations (inner shapes) of LTMs in motion were 6.6 ± 0.6% and 104.4 ± 71.2 HU between ss-DECT and TNC CT and −8.4 ± 10.6% and 25.5 ± 58.5 HU between ds-DECT and TNC, respectively.Conclusion:ss-DECT VNC images could not sufficiently subtract iodine from water in LTMs inmotion, whereas ds-DECT VNC images might be a valid alternative to a TNC CT.Advances in knowledge:ds-DECT provides a contrasted image for contouring and a non-contrasted image for radiotherapy treatment planning for LTM in motion.     

The potential of iodinated contrast reduction in dual-energy CT thoracic angiography; an evaluation of image quality

IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to compare a dual energy CT (DECT) protocol with 50% reduction of iodinated contrast to a single energy CT (SECT) protocol using standard contrast dose in imaging of the thoracic aorta.MethodsDECT with a 50% reduction in iodinated contrast was compared with SECT. For DECT, monoenergetic images at 50, 55, 60, 65, 68, 70, and 74 keV were reconstructed with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V) of 50% and 80%. Objective image quality parameters included intravascular attenuation (HU), image noise (SD), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Two independent radiologists subjectively assessed the image quality for the 55 and 68 keV DECT reconstructions and SECT on a five-point Likert scale.ResultsAcross 14 patients, the intravascular attenuation at 50–55 keV was comparable to SECT (p > 0.05). The CNRs were significantly lower for DECT with ASIR-V 50% compared to SECT for all keV-values (p < 0.05 for all). For ASIR-V 80%, CNR was comparable to SECT at energies below 60 keV (p > 0.05). The subjective image quality was comparable between DECT and SECT independent of keV level.ConclusionThis study indicates that a 50% reduction in iodinated contrast may result in adequate image quality using DECT with monoenergetic reconstructions at lower energy levels for the imaging of the thoracic aorta. The best image quality was obtained for ASiR-V 80% image reconstructions at 55 keV.Implications of practiceDual energy CT with a reduction in iodinated contrast may result in adequate image quality in imaging of the thoracic aorta. However, increased radiation dose may limit the use to patients in which a reduction in fluid and iodinated contrast volume may outweigh this risk.     

Reducing contrast medium dose with low photon energy images in renal dual-energy spectral CT angiography and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR)

Objective:To evaluate the value of using low energy (keV) images in renal dual-energy spectral CT angiography (CTA) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) to reduce contrast medium dose.Methods:40 patients with renal CTA on a Discovery CT750HD were randomly divided into two groups: 20 cases (Group A) with 600 mgI kg⁻¹ and 20 cases (Group B) with 300 mgI kg⁻¹. The scan protocol for both groups was: dual-energy mode with mA selection for noise index of 10 HU, pitch 1.375:1, rotating speed 0.6 s/r. Images were reconstructed at 0.625 mm thickness with 40%ASIR, Group A used the conventional 70keV monochromatic images, and Group B used monochromatic images from 40 to 70 keV at 5 keV interval for analysis. The CT values and standard deviation (SD) values of the renal artery and erector spine in the plain and arterial phases were measured with the erector spine SD value representing image noise. The enhancement degree of the renal artery (ΔCT = CT(arterial) -CT(plain)), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR=CT_renal-artery/SD_renal-artery) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR=(CT_renal-artery-CT_{erector spine})/SD_{erector-spine}) were calculated. The single factor analysis of variance was used to analyze the difference of ΔCT, SNR and CNR among image groups with p < 0.05 being statistically significant. The subjective image scores of the groups were assessed blindly by two experienced physicians using a 5-point system and the score consistency was compared by the κ test.Results:Contrast medium dose in the 300 mgI kg⁻¹ group was reduced by 50% compared with the 600 mgI kg⁻¹ group, while radiation dose was similar between the two groups. The subjective scores were 4.00 ± 0.65, 4.50 ± 0.60 and 3.70 ± 0.80 for images at 70 keV (600 mgI kg⁻¹ group), 40 keV (300 mgI kg⁻¹ group) and 45 keV (300 mgI kg⁻¹ group), respectively with good consistency between the two reviewers (p > 0.05). The 40 keV images in the 300 mgI kg⁻¹ group had similar ΔCT (469.77 ± 86.95 HU vs 398.54 ± 73.68 HU) and CNR (15.52 ± 3.32 vs 18.78 ± 6.71) values as the 70 keV images in the 600 mgI kg⁻¹) group but higher SNR values (30.19 ± 4.41 vs 16.91 ± 11.12, p < 0,05)Conclusion:Contrast dose may be reduced by 50% while maintaining image quality by using lower energy images combined with ASIR in renal dual-energy CTA.Advances in knowledge:Combined with ASIR and energy spectrum, can reduce the amount of contrast dose in renal CTA.     

A study of using a deep learning image reconstruction to improve the image quality of extremely low-dose contrast-enhanced abdominal CT for patients with hepatic lesions

Objective:To investigate the feasibility of using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) to significantly reduce radiation dose and improve image quality in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT.Methods:This was a prospective study. 40 patients with hepatic lesions underwent abdominal CT using routine dose (120kV, noise index (NI) setting of 11 with automatic tube current modulation) in the arterial-phase (AP) and portal-phase (PP), and low dose (NI = 24) in the delayed-phase (DP). All images were reconstructed at 1.25 mm thickness using ASIR-V at 50% strength. In addition, images in DP were reconstructed using DLIR in high setting (DLIR-H). The CT value and standard deviation (SD) of hepatic parenchyma, spleen, paraspinal muscle and lesion were measured. The overall image quality includes subjective noise, sharpness, artifacts and diagnostic confidence were assessed by two radiologists blindly using a 5-point scale (1, unacceptable and 5, excellent). Dose between AP and DP was compared, and image quality among different reconstructions were compared using SPSS20.0.Results:Compared to AP, DP significantly reduced radiation dose by 76% (0.76 ± 0.09 mSv vs 3.18 ± 0.48 mSv), DLIR-H DP images had lower image noise (14.08 ± 2.89 HU vs 16.67 ± 3.74 HU, p < 0.001) but similar overall image quality score as the ASIR-V50% AP images (3.88 ± 0.34 vs 4.05 ± 0.44, p > 0.05). For the DP images, DLIR-H significantly reduced image noise in hepatic parenchyma, spleen, muscle and lesion to (14.77 ± 2.61 HU, 14.26 ± 2.67 HU, 14.08 ± 2.89 HU and 16.25 ± 4.42 HU) from (24.95 ± 4.32 HU, 25.42 ± 4.99 HU, 23.99 ± 5.26 HU and 27.01 ± 7.11) with ASIR-V50%, respectively (all p < 0.001) and improved image quality score (3.88 ± 0.34 vs 2.87 ± 0.53; p < 0.05).Conclusion:DLIR-H significantly reduces image noise and generates images with clinically acceptable quality and diagnostic confidence with 76% dose reduction.Advances in knowledge:(1) DLIR-H yielded a significantly lower image noise, higher CNR and higher overall image quality score and diagnostic confidence than the ASIR-V50% under low signal conditions. (2) Our study demonstrated that at 76% lower radiation dose, the DLIR-H DP images had similar overall image quality to the routine-dose ASIR-V50% AP images.     

Image quality and radiation dose of low tube voltage 3rd generation dual-source coronary CT angiography in obese patients: a phantom study

Objectives

To assess the influence of tube potential on radiation dose and image quality of third-generation dual-source coronary CT angiography (CTA) in a phantom simulating an obese patient.

Methods

A thoracic phantom was equipped with tubular inserts containing iodine solution and water. A soft-tissue-equivalent ring around the phantom simulated an obese patient. Images were acquired at tube potentials of 80, 100, 120 and 140 kV with second-generation dual-source CT (DSCT) and 70–150 kV (in 10-kV increments) with third-generation DSCT. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated and CT dose index was recorded.

Results

With second-generation DSCT, CNR was highest for 120 kV (19.0) and decreased with lower tube potential (12.0 at 80 kV) owing to disproportionately increased image noise. With third-generation DSCT, 70- and 80-kV acquisitions showed a smaller increase in noise. CNRs for third-generation DSCT were highest for 70 and 80 kV (21.1 and 21.2, respectively). Compared to 120 kV, radiation dose was 68 % and 49 % lower at 70 kV and 80 kV, respectively.

Conclusion

Third-generation DSCT enables one to perform coronary CTA at 70–80 kV in obese patients without compromising CNR and thus reduces radiation dose by 49–68 %.

Key points

? Low tube potential CT angiography is currently not suitable for obese patients. ? Third-generation DSCT offers substantially increased tube power at low tube potential. ? This enables one to perform coronary CT angiography at 70–80 kV in obese patients. ? Signal-to-noise ratio is maintained owing to increased tube current. ? This approach can be expected to reduce radiation dose by 49–68 %.     

Evaluation of lung cancer by enhanced dual-energy CT: association between three-dimensional iodine concentration and tumour differentiation

Objective:

To investigate the correlation between iodine concentration of dual-energy CT (DECT) and histopathology of surgically resected primary lung cancers.

Methods:

We reviewed the medical records, post-operative pathological records and pre-operative DECT images of patients who underwent surgical lung resection for primary lung cancer. After injection of iodinated contrast media, arterial and delayed phases were scanned using 140- and 80-kV tube voltages. Three-dimensional iodine concentration (iodine volume) of primary tumours was calculated using lung nodule application software.

Results:

A total of 60 patients (37 males and 23 females; age range, 39–84 years; mean age, 69 years) with 62 lung cancers were analysed. The resected tumours were histopathologically classified into well-differentiated (G1; n = 20), moderately differentiated (G2; n = 29), poorly differentiated (G3; n = 9) and undifferentiated (G4; n = 4) groups by degree of tumour differentiation (DTD). The mean ± standard deviation of iodine volume at the delayed phase was 59.6 ± 18.6 HU in G1 tumours, 46.5 ± 11.3 HU in G2 tumours, 34.3 ± 15.0 HU in G3 tumours and 28.8 ± 6.4 HU in G4 tumours; significant differences were observed between groups (p < 0.001). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that iodine volumes both at the early and delayed phases were significantly correlated with DTD (p = 0.006 and p = 0.001, respectively), whereas gender, body weight and tumour size were not (p = 0.084, p = 0.062 and p = 0.391, respectively).

Conclusion:

The iodine volume of lung cancers was significantly associated with their DTD. High-grade tumours tended to have lower iodine volumes than low-grade tumours.

Advances in knowledge:

Iodine volume measured by DECT could be a valuable functional imaging method to estimate differentiation of primary lung cancer.     

Model-based vs hybrid iterative reconstruction technique in ultralow-dose submillisievert CT colonography

Objective:

To compare image quality of different reconstruction techniques in submillisievert ultralow-dose CT colonography (CTC) and to correlate colonic findings with subsequent optical colonoscopy.

Methods:

58 patients underwent ultralow-dose CTC. The images were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) or model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) techniques. In each segment, endoluminal noise (expressed as standard deviation of endoluminal density) was measured and image quality was rated on a five-point Likert scale by two independent readers. Colonic lesions were evaluated in consensus and correlated with subsequent optical colonoscopy where possible.

Results:

The estimated radiation dose was 0.41 ± 0.05 mSv for the supine and 0.42 ± 0.04 mSv for the prone acquisitions. In the endoluminal view, the image quality was rated better in HIR, whereas better scores were obtained in MBIR in the cross-sectional view, where the endoluminal noise was the lowest (p < 0.0001). Five (26%) polyps were not identified using both computer-aided detection and endoluminal inspection in FBP images vs only one (5%) in MBIR and none in HIR images.

Conclusion:

This study showed that in submillisievert ultralow-dose CTC, the image quality for the endoluminal view is better when HIR is used, whereas MBIR yields superior images for the cross-sectional view. The inferior quality of images reconstructed with FBP may result in decreased detection of colonic lesions.

Advances in knowledge:

Radiation dose from CTC can be safely reduced <1 mSv for both positions when iterative reconstruction is used. MBIR provides better image quality in the cross-sectional view and HIR in the endoluminal view.CT colonography (CTC) has a comparable sensitivity and specificity to optical colonoscopy (OC) in diagnosing relevant colonic lesions.^1,2 Compared with OC, its major disadvantages are the radiation dose and the inability to biopsy or remove polyps.^3,4 Although the true risk of stochastic effects from a CTC examination in adults is very low, its routine large-scale use must be responsibly weighted against its benefits.⁵ Fortunately, high contrast among colonic wall, intraluminal air and tagged stool, as well as the widely accepted minimal size of a polyp to be reported (which relates to the required spatial resolution), allow reduction of the time–current product to 50–30 mAs in a 120-kV protocol without sacrificing diagnostic acceptability.⁶ For CTC, the estimated benefit–risk ratio of 24–35 : 1 per 7–8 mSv can be increased in direct proportion to the decrease of the radiation dose, provided that the image quality is maintained.⁴ Further reduction of the radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic acceptability requires special considerations regarding acquisition and image-processing techniques.^7–9 In particular, new developments in the field of iterative reconstruction offer further reduction of the radiation dose with preserved image quality.^7,10The objective of this study was to compare image quality of different reconstruction techniques in a submillisievert ultralow-dose CTC in order to assess image quality and recommend the most applicable technique. Furthermore, we evaluated colonic findings and, where possible, correlated the findings with subsequent OC.     

Feasibility of extracellular volume quantification using dual-energy CT

ObjectiveTo assess the feasibility of dual energy CT (DECT) to derive myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) and detect myocardial ECV differences without a non-contrast acquisition, compared to single energy CT (SECT).MethodsSubjects (n = 35) with focal fibrosis (n = 17), diffuse fibrosis (n = 10), and controls (n = 9) underwent non-contrast and delayed acquisitions to calculate SECT-ECV. DECT-ECV was calculated using the delayed acquisition and the derived virtual non-contrast images. In the control and diffuse fibrotic groups, the entire myocardium of the left ventricle was used to calculate ECV. Two ROIs were placed in the focal fibrotic group, one in normal and one in fibrotic myocardium.ResultsMedian ECV was 33.4% (IQR, 30.1–37.4) using SECT and 34.9% (IQR, 31.2–39.2) using DECT (p = 0.401). For both techniques, focal and diffuse fibrosis had significantly higher ECV values (all p < 0.021) than normal myocardium. There was no systematic bias between DECT and SECT (p = 0.348). SECT had a higher radiation dose (1.1 mSv difference) than DECT (p < 0.001).ConclusionECV can be measured using a DECT approach with only a delayed acquisition. The DECT approach provides similar results at a lower radiation dose compared to SECT.     

Comparison of virtual monochromatic series,iodine overlay maps,and single energy CT equivalent images in head and neck cancer conspicuity

ObjectiveTo compare lesion conspicuity amongst DECT monochromatic series (40, 45, 50 keV), and single-energy CT (SECT) equivalent images in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC).MethodsTwo readers compared DECT images to 70 keV SECT equivalent series in 39 patients with HNSCC on lesion margin, enhancement, and overall conspicuity.ResultsThe 45 keV and 50 keV images were significantly better (p-values ≤ 0.001) than the SECT equivalent in lesion enhancement, margins, and overall conspicuity for both readers. Readers mostly preferred the 50 keV monochromatic series.ConclusionDECT can provide better lesion visualization than SECT in HNSCC.     

Comparison of image quality and radiation dose of different pulmonary CTA protocols on a 128-slice CT: high-pitch dual source CT, dual energy CT and conventional spiral CT

Objectives

To compare image quality and radiation dose of high-pitch dual-source computed tomography (DSCT), dual energy CT (DECT) and conventional single-source spiral CT (SCT) for pulmonary CT angiography (CTA) on a 128-slice CT system.

Methods

Pulmonary CTA was performed with five protocols: high-pitch DSCT (100?kV), high-pitch DSCT (120?kV), DECT (100/140?kV), SCT (100?kV), and SCT (120?kV). For each protocol, 30 sex, age, and body-mass-index (mean 25.3?kg/m²) matched patients were identified. Retrospectively, two observers subjectively assessed image quality, measured CT attenuation (HU±SD) at seven central and peripheral levels, and calculated signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR). Radiation exposure parameters (CTDIvol and DLP) were compared.

Results

Subjective image quality was rated good to excellent in >92% (>138/150) with an interobserver agreement of 91.4%. The five protocols did not significantly differ in image quality, neither by subjective, nor by objective measures (SNR, CNR). By contrast, radiation exposure differed between protocols: significant lower radiation was achieved by using high-pitch DSCT at 100?kV (p?Conclusions SCT, high-pitch DSCT, and DECT protocols techniques result in similar subjective and objective image quality, but radiation exposure was significantly lower with high-pitch DSCT at 100?kV.

Key Points

• New CT protocols show promising results in pulmonary embolism assessment.
• High-pitch dual-source CT (DSCT) at 100?kV provides radiation dose savings for pulmonary CTA.
• High-pitch DSCT at 100?kV maintains diagnostic image quality for pulmonary CTA.
• Dual energy CT uses more radiation but also provides lung perfusion evaluation.
• Whether the additional perfusion data is worth the extra radiation remains undetermined.

     

Estimation of the radiation dose for dental spectral cone-beam CT

Objectives:The purpose of this study was to estimate the radiation dose for a dental spectral cone-beam CT (SCBCT) unit at different scanning parameters.Methods:Radiation dose measurements were performed for a commercially available dental SCBCT. Scans were obtained at different exposure times and fields of view (FOV), both for non-spectral (25×18 cm, 14×18 cm, 14×12 cm, 9×9 cm, 6×6 cm) and spectral modes (14×18 cm, 14×12 cm, 9×9 cm, 6×6 cm) with the tube voltage alternating between 80 and 110 kV for spectral mode, and fixed at 110 kV for non-spectral mode. An ion chamber was used for air kerma and dose area product (DAP) measurements. The effective dose was estimated based on the mAs using previously published logarithmic curves for CBCT units with a similar X-ray spectrum.Results:The adult effective dose, in non-spectral mode, was 44-269 µSv for small FOVs, 131-336 µSv for the medium FOV, and 163-476 µSv for the large FOV. In spectral mode, the estimated adult effective doses were 96-206 µSv for small, 299 µSv for medium and 372 µSv for large FOV protocols. Paediatric effective doses were estimated to be 75% higher than corresponding adult doses.Conclusion:SCBCT showed comparable doses with other CBCT devices, but DAP values were generally above currently published DRLs. Spectral imaging might allow for artefact reduction at comparable dose levels, which should be assessed in further image quality studies at both a technical and diagnostic levels.     

Preliminary report on virtual monochromatic spectral imaging with fast kVp switching dual energy head CT: comparable image quality to that of 120-kVp CT without increasing the radiation dose

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate whether the image quality of virtual monochromatic spectral imaging with fast kVp switching dual-energy CT (DECT) can be comparable to that of 120-kVp single-energy CT (SECT) without increasing the radiation dose.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively identified 15 postoperative patients who had undergone both DECT and 120-kVp SECT within a short period of time for follow-up after brain surgery. Simulated 65 keV monochromatic images were reconstructed from DECT data. Subjective image noise, gray–white matter contrast, and overall image quality were rated using a four-point scale. Quantitative measurement of noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and posterior fossa beam-hardening artifact were also performed. The figure of merit (FOM), calculated as CNR²/CTDI_vol, was used to quantify image quality improvement per exposure risk.

Results

The mean CTDI_vol was 70.2 ± 0.3 mGy for DECT, which was 11 % lower than SECT (78.9 ± 2.1 mGy). All images were graded above clinically acceptable. Quantitative and qualitative measures for simulated 65-keV images were comparable with SECT images, except for increase in subjective noise. FOM was significantly greater for simulated 65-keV images (P = .03).

Conclusion

Our results indicate that virtual monochromatic imaging possibly provides comparable image quality to that afforded by 120-kVp SECT without increasing the dose in routine head CT.     

Metal artifact reduction in cervix brachytherapy with titanium applicators using dual‐energy CT through virtual monoenergetic images and an iterative algorithm: A phantom study

PURPOSETo evaluate an iterative metal-artifact reduction (iMAR) algorithm, dual-energy CT (DECT) through virtual monoenergetic images (VMI), and a combination of iMAR and DECT for reducing metal artifact severity (AS) induced by Fletcher titanium applicators used in cervix brachytherapy, the efficacy of which are hitherto unreported.METHODS AND MATERIALS120 kV_p single-energy CT (SECT) (Siemens) of BEBIG tandem applicators, varying in shape (straight or curved) and diameter (3.5 mm or 5 mm) in a custom-made water-filled phantom, and their DECT images obtained from extrapolation of 80 kVp and 140 kVp, were reconstructed using four methods: DECT through VMI±iMAR, and SECT±iMAR. The DECT images were reconstructed monoenergetically at 70, 150, and 190 keV. AS was evaluated using measured values and statistical analysis.RESULTSiMAR, DECT, and combined DECT and iMAR reduced AS (p < 0.05). DECT had a lower AS than SECT, even without iMAR (p < 0.025). SECT+iMAR was more effective than DECT-iMAR with VMI at 70 and 190 keV (p < 0.05), whereas showing no statistically significant difference at 150 keV. With DECT and iMAR combined, AS was reduced more effectively compared to the SECT+iMAR or DECT alone. It also reduced the mean interobserver uncertainty by 0.2 mm.CONCLUSIONSThese findings indicate that iMAR reduces the AS caused by Fletcher titanium applicators for both SECT and DECT, a combination of iMAR and DECT is superior to either strategy alone, and at low energies, DECT+iMAR also produces similar artifact reduction. These practical strategies promise more accurate source-position and structure definitions in CT-based gynecological brachytherapy treatment planning.     

Comparative study of hepatic venography using non-linear-blending images,monochromatic images and low-voltage images of dual-energy CT

Objective:

To investigate the use of non-linear-blending and monochromatic dual-energy CT (DECT) images to improve the image quality of hepatic venography.

Methods:

82 patients undergoing abdominal DECT in the portal venous phase were enrolled. For each patient, 31 data sets of monochromatic images and 7 data sets of non-linear-blending images were generated. The data sets of the non-linear-blending and monochromatic images with the best contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) for hepatic veins were selected and compared with the images obtained at 80 kVp and a simulated 120 kVp. The subjective image quality of the hepatic veins was evaluated using a four-point scale. The image quality of the hepatic veins was analysed using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and CNR values.

Results:

The optimal CNR between hepatic veins and the liver was obtained with the non-linear-blending images. Compared with the other three groups, there were significant differences in the maximum CNR, the SNR, the subjective ratings and the minimum background noise (p < 0.001). A comparison of the monochromatic and 80-kVp images revealed that the CNR and subjective ratings were both improved (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the CNR or subjective ratings between the simulated 120-kVp group and the control group (p = 0.090 and 0.053, respectively).

Conclusion:

The non-linear-blending technique for acquiring DECT provided the best image quality for hepatic venography.

Advances in knowledge:

DECT can enhance the contrast of hepatic veins and the liver, potentially allowing the wider use of low-dose contrast agents for CT examination of the liver.CT venography (CTV) is an important non-invasive examination to assess the hepatic veins and plays an important role in the pre-operative evaluation of liver transplants and the diagnosis of hepatic venous diseases.^1,2 Compared with CT hepatic artery angiography or multiphasic liver CT, CTV often requires a larger dose of the contrast agent to achieve sufficient contrast for filling in the hepatic veins.³ Increasing the contrast agent not only increases the economic burden of the patient but also raises the incidence of side effects and complications related to the contrast agent. One of the goals in the advancement of CT techniques is to continuously improve the image quality and clinical applications while reducing radiation exposure and promoting the reasonable use of contrast agents. Several studies suggest that low tube voltage CTV reduces radiation and improves vascular contrast^4–6 because iodinated contrast material is more conspicuous in low-kilovolt peak(kVp) images with an approximately 80% increase in CT attenuation at 80 kVp compared with that at 140 kVp.^6–8Dual-source CT (DSCT) was recently introduced into clinical practice. It can simultaneously acquire low- and high-energy image data using two X-ray tube and detector systems mounted in one gantry.⁹ Dual-energy CT (DECT) could improve the contrast and thereby the image quality of CTV images by virtual monochromatic imaging¹⁰ and non-linear-blending⁸ and linear-blending techniques.^7,11,12 Studies have shown that a DECT non-linear-blending technique could improve the conspicuity of myocardial delayed enhancement.⁸ The clinical application of DSCT undoubtedly greatly aides the choice of a suitable application from a variety of post-processing techniques that can significantly improve the contrast enhancement of hepatic veins. However, the ability to improve the conspicuity of hepatic veins via a dual-source DECT non-linear-blending technique and the performance of non-linear-blending and monochromatic imaging techniques have not been studied. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to improve the image quality of hepatic venography over single-energy CT by using DECT virtual monochromatic imaging and a non-linear-blending technique.     

Dose performance and image quality: dual source CT versus single source CT in cardiac CT angiography

Objective

To evaluate dose performance and image quality of 64-slice dual source CT (DSCT) in comparison to 64-slice single source CT (SSCT) in cardiac CT angiography (CTA).

Methods

100 patients examined by DSCT and 60 patients scanned by SSCT were included in this study. Objective indices such as image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio and signal-to-noise ratio were analyzed. Subjective image quality was assessed by two cardiovascular radiologists in consensus using a four-point scale (1 = excellent to 4 = not acceptable). Estimation of effective dose was performed on the basis of dose length product (DLP).

Results

At low heart rates (<70 bpm), image quality of SSCT was equivalent to that of DSCT (P > 0.05), but, at high heart rates (>70 bpm), DSCT provided robust image quality (P < 0.05). The average effective dose of SSCT was 9.3 ± 0.9 mSv at low heart rates (<70 bpm) while, the average estimated effective doses of DSCT were 9.1 ± 1.3 mSv, 8.3 ± 1.1 mSv, 7.9 ± 1.1 mSv, 6.9 ± 0.7 mSv, and 5.9 ± 1.3 mSv, corresponding to heart rates of 50-59 bpm, 60-69 bpm, 70-79 bpm, 80-89 bpm, and 90-100 bpm.

Conclusion

For cardiac CTA, both DSCT and SSCT can get good image quality at low heart rates (<70 bpm) with a similar radiation dose, but, at high heart rates (>70 bpm), DSCT is able to provide robust diagnostic image quality at doses far below that of SSCT.     

Dose performance and image quality: Dual source CT versus single source CT in cardiac CT angiography

ObjectiveTo evaluate dose performance and image quality of 64-slice dual source CT (DSCT) in comparison to 64-slice single source CT (SSCT) in cardiac CT angiography (CTA).Methods100 patients examined by DSCT and 60 patients scanned by SSCT were included in this study. Objective indices such as image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio and signal-to-noise ratio were analyzed. Subjective image quality was assessed by two cardiovascular radiologists in consensus using a four-point scale (1 = excellent to 4 = not acceptable). Estimation of effective dose was performed on the basis of dose length product (DLP).ResultsAt low heart rates (<70 bpm), image quality of SSCT was equivalent to that of DSCT (P > 0.05), but, at high heart rates (>70 bpm), DSCT provided robust image quality (P < 0.05). The average effective dose of SSCT was 9.3 ± 0.9 mSv at low heart rates (<70 bpm) while, the average estimated effective doses of DSCT were 9.1 ± 1.3 mSv, 8.3 ± 1.1 mSv, 7.9 ± 1.1 mSv, 6.9 ± 0.7 mSv, and 5.9 ± 1.3 mSv, corresponding to heart rates of 50–59 bpm, 60–69 bpm, 70–79 bpm, 80–89 bpm, and 90–100 bpm.ConclusionFor cardiac CTA, both DSCT and SSCT can get good image quality at low heart rates (<70 bpm) with a similar radiation dose, but, at high heart rates (>70 bpm), DSCT is able to provide robust diagnostic image quality at doses far below that of SSCT.     

Comparing the supine and erect pelvis radiographic examinations: an evaluation of anatomy,image quality and radiation dose

Objectives:Pelvis radiographs are usually acquired supine despite standing imaging reflecting functional anatomy. We compared supine and erect radiographic examinations for anatomical features, radiation dose and image quality.Methods:60 patients underwent pelvis radiography in both supine and erect positions at the same examination appointment. Measures of body mass index and sagittal diameter were obtained. Images were evaluated using visual grading analysis and pelvic tilt was compared. Dose–area product values were recorded and inputted into the CalDose_X software to estimate effective dose (ED). The CalDose_X software allowed comparisons using data from the erect and supine sex-specific phantoms (MAX06 & FAX06).Results:Patient sagittal diameter was greater on standing with an average 20.6% increase at the iliac crest (median 30.0, interquartile range [26.0 to 34.0] cm), in comparison to the supine position [24.0 (22.3 to 28.0) cm; p < 0.001]. 57 (95%) patients had posterior pelvic tilt on weight-bearing. Erect image quality was significantly decreased with median image quality scores of 78% (69 to 85) compared to 87% for the supine position [81 to 91] (p < 0.001). In the erect position, the ED was 47% higher [0.17 (0.13 to 0.33) mSv vs 0.12 (0.08 to 0.18) mSv (p < 0.001)], influenced by the increased sagittal diameter. 42 (70%) patients preferred the standing examination.Conclusion:Patient diameter and pelvic tilt were altered on weightbearing. Erect images demonstrated an overall decrease in image quality with a higher radiation dose. Optimal acquisition parameters are required for erect pelvis radiography as the supine technique is not directly transferable.     

Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction in Low-Tube-Voltage Contrast-Enhanced Neck CT: Evaluation of Objective and Subjective Image Quality

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Dose-saving techniques in neck CT cause increased image noise that can be counteracted by iterative reconstruction. Our aim was to evaluate the image quality of advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) in contrast-enhanced low-tube-voltage neck CT.MATERIALS AND METHODS:Sixty-one patients underwent 90-kV(peak) neck CT by using third-generation 192-section dual-source CT. Image series were reconstructed with standard filtered back-projection and ADMIRE strength levels 1, 3, and 5. Attenuation and noise of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, internal jugular vein, submandibular gland, tongue, subscapularis muscle, and cervical fat were measured. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were calculated. Two radiologists assessed image noise, image contrast, delineation of smaller structures, and overall diagnostic acceptability. Interobserver agreement was calculated.RESULTS:Image noise was significantly reduced by using ADMIRE compared with filtered back-projection with the lowest noise observed in ADMIRE 5 (filtered back-projection, 9.4 ± 2.4 Hounsfield units [HU]; ADMIRE 1, 8.3 ± 2.8 HU; ADMIRE 3, 6.7 ± 2.0 HU; ADMIRE 5, 5.4 ± 1.7 HU; all, P < .001). Sternocleidomastoid SNR and internal jugular vein–sternocleidomastoid contrast-to-noise ratios were significantly higher for ADMIRE with the best results in ADMIRE 5 (all, P < .001). Subjective image quality and image contrast of ADMIRE 3 and 5 were consistently rated better than those for filtered back-projection and ADMIRE 1 (all, P < .001). Image noise was rated highest for ADMIRE 5 (all, P < .005). Delineation of smaller structures was voted higher in all ADMIRE strength levels compared with filtered back-projection (P < .001). Global interobserver agreement was good (0.75).CONCLUSIONS:Contrast-enhanced 90-kVp neck CT is feasible, and ADMIRE 5 shows superior objective image quality compared with filtered back-projection. ADMIRE 3 and 5 show the best subjective image quality.

Contrast-enhanced CT is a well-established initial cross-sectional imaging technique for examination of the head and neck region.^1–3 Several strategies have been developed for both radiation dose reduction and improvement of image quality. These typically involve adjusting CT acquisition parameters such as tube voltage, tube current, tube rotation time, pitch, and collimation to the patient body and examined body region.^4–6 The interaction of these parameters is complex, and manual adjustments may result in nondiagnostic images. Thus, commercially available techniques, including tube current modulation,⁷ automatic exposure control,^8,9 automated tube voltage adaptation,^10,11 iterative reconstruction,^12–15 and selective in-plane shielding (thyroid, eye lens, breast, and gonads),¹⁶ have been introduced to support the radiologic technologist, physicist, and radiologist team in developing appropriate CT protocols.Reduced tube voltage can increase contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of iodine enhancing soft-tissue structures, while the radiation dose is substantially reduced.⁴ The drawback of an increased image noise in low-tube-voltage examinations can be counteracted by iterative reconstruction, which reduces image noise compared with filtered back-projection (FBP).^12,14 Recently introduced advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) performs detailed modeling in the projection data domain, resulting in less noise and improved artifact suppression.¹⁷ ADMIRE includes a local signal-to-noise relationship analysis and decomposes the image data into information and noise.¹⁸ Further technical details have been described in recent studies.^14,17,18 Thus, neck CT may potentially be performed with a reduced tube voltage and therefore lower radiation dose without impairing image quality.The purpose of our study was to evaluate the impact of ADMIRE on image quality in low-tube-voltage contrast-enhanced neck CT compared with FBP on a 192-section third-generation dual-source CT (DSCT).