Is Atrial Fibrillation a Risk Factor for Worse Outcomes in Severe COVID-19 Patients: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort

IntroductionNew onset atrial fibrillation leads to worse outcomes in patients with sepsis. The association between new onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in COVID19 patients with COVID19 outcomes are lacking. This study aims to determine whether new onset atrial fibrillation in COVID19 patients admitted in the ICU is a risk factor for death or requirement of mechanical ventilation (MV).MethodsThis is a retrospective study conducted in a cohort of COVID-19 patients admitted to Bahrain Defence Force COVID19 Field ICU between April 2020 to November 2020. Data were extracted from the electronic medical records. The patients who developed new onset AF during admission were compared to patients who remained in sinus rhythm. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to control for confounders and estimate the effect of AF on the outcomes of these patients.ResultsOur study included a total of 492 patients out of which 30 were diagnosed with new onset AF. In the AF group, the primary outcome occurred in 66.7% of patients (n = 20). In the control group, 17.1% (n = 79) developed the primary outcome. Upon adjusting for the confounders in the multivariate regression model, AF had an odds ratio of 3.96 (95% CI: 1.05–14.98; p = 0.042) for the primary outcome.ConclusionOur results indicate that new onset AF is a risk factor for worse outcomes in patients admitted with COVID19 in the ICU.     

Factors Associated with Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Methotrexate: A Single-center Retrospective Study

Objective To investigate the risk factors for the development of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) undergoing methotrexate (MTX) therapy. Methods This single-center retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with RA who received MTX for at least one year. The study population was divided into PCP and non-PCP groups, depending on the development of PCP, and their characteristics were compared. We excluded patients who received biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), Janus kinase inhibitors, and anti-PCP drugs for prophylaxis. Results Thirteen patients developed PCP, and 333 did not develop PCP. At the initiation of MTX therapy, the PCP group had lower serum albumin levels, a higher frequency of pulmonary disease and administration of DMARDs, and received a higher dosage of prednisolone (PSL) than the non-PCP group. A multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the concomitant use of PSL [hazard ratio (HR) 5.50, p=0.003], other DMARDs (HR 5.98, p=0.002), and serum albumin <3.5 mg/dL (HR 4.30, p=0.01) were risk factors for the development of PCP during MTX therapy. Patients with these risk factors had a significantly higher cumulative probability of developing PCP than patients who lacked these risk factors. Conclusion Clinicians should pay close attention to patients with RA who possess risk factors for the development of PCP during MTX therapy.     

Infliximab versus Cyclosporine Treatment for Severe Corticosteroid-Refractory Ulcerative Colitis: A Korean,Retrospective, Single Center Study

Background/AimsIn patients with corticosteroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC), cyclosporine or infliximab may be added to the treatment regimen to induce remission. Here, we aimed to compare the efficacy of cyclosporine and infliximab.MethodsBetween January 1995 and May 2012, the medical records of 43 patients with corticosteroid-refractory UC who received either infliximab or cyclosporine as a rescue therapy at a tertiary care hospital in Korea were reviewed.ResultsAmong the 43 patients, 10 underwent rescue therapy with cyclosporine and the remaining 33 patients received infliximab. A follow-up of 12 months was completed for all patients. The colectomy rate at 12 months was 30% and 3% in the cyclosporine and the infliximab groups, respectively (p=0.034). However, the Cox proportional hazard model indicated that the treatment of rescue therapy was not an independent associate factor for preventing colectomy (p=0.164). In the subgroup analysis, infliximab with azathioprine was superior to cyclosporine for preventing colectomy (hazard ratio of infliximab with azathioprine compared with cyclosporine only, 0.073; 95% confidence interval, 0.008 to 0.629).ConclusionsNo difference between infliximab and cyclosporine with respect to preventing colectomy was noted. However, infliximab with azathioprine may be more effective than cyclosporine alone for preventing colectomy.     

Efficacy of High‐Throughput Leukocytapheresis for Rheumatoid Arthritis With a Reduced Response to Infliximab

Infliximab (INF), a tumor necrosis factor‐alpha (TNF‐α) inhibitor, is an effective drug for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, some patients receive no clinical benefit, or the agents gradually lose their effect. Five sessions of high‐throughput leukocytapheresis (LCAP) were given at a frequency of once a week using a Cellsorba CS‐180S to four patients with a reduced response to INF. The clinical response to LCAP was evaluated using the 28‐joint disease activity score with C‐reactive protein (DAS28‐CRP) and with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28‐ESR). DAS28‐CRP decreased significantly from 5.8 ± 0.6 before LCAP to 3.9 ± 0.7 (P = 0.0182) at 1–2 weeks after completion of five sessions of LCAP, and DAS28‐ESR decreased significantly from 6.4 ± 0.6 to 4.6 ± 0.5 (P = 0.0267). Moreover, all patients had a moderate response according to the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. The effect of LCAP continued for at least 6 months after its completion in all patients, with no changes in any of their concomitant drugs, and the effect was maintained for at least 1 year in three of the four patients. These results indicate that LCAP is a useful treatment for RA patients with a reduced response to INF.     

Retrospective Analysis of Long-term Lipid Apheresis at a Single Center

We retrospectively analyzed 10 906 lipid apheresis sessions (heparin-induced lipoprotein precipitation, direct adsorption of lipoproteins, double filtration plasmapheresis, dextran sulfate adsorption, and immunoadsorption) in 38 patients who were consecutively treated in our department during the last 20 years. The incidences of major cardiovascular events (MACE) (death, cerebrovascular accident, myocardial infarction, limb amputation, and renal vascular involvement) were taken separately as primary end-points or as a combined end-point. The time-course of secondary end-points (coronary and extracranial status of arteries, left ventricular function, occlusive artery disease, and calculated glomerular filtration rate [cGFR]) were also evaluated, as well as the extent of the reduction in plasma lipids and lipoproteins and the incidence of therapy associated side-effects. MACE decreased from 7.02% events per patient per year at the start of lipid apheresis to 1.17% during lipid apheresis and the rate of myocardial revascularization decreased from 22.8% to 3.8% per patient per year. Classical (diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, and smoking history), as well as novel risk factors (cGFR < 60 mL/min, statin withdrawal, mixed hyperlipoproteinemia, and elevated lipoprotein (a)) were associated with an elevated risk for MACE. All applied methods had comparable effects. All lipid apheresis methods proved to be safe and suitable for long-term treatment. The present data demonstrate that treatment with lipid apheresis is very effective and leads to long-term reduction in cardiovascular mortality and morbidity.     

Progression of Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Hypertensive Patients in a Reference Center

Background

Hypertension is a public health problem, considering its high prevalence, low control rate and cardiovascular complications.

Objective

Evaluate the control of blood pressure (BP) and cardiovascular outcomes in patients enrolled at the Reference Center for Hypertension and Diabetes, located in a medium-sized city in the Midwest Region of Brazil.

Methods

Population-based study comparing patients enrolled in the service at the time of their admission and after an average follow-up of five years. Participants were aged ≥18 years and were regularly monitored at the Center up to 6 months before data collection. We assessed demographic variables, BP, body mass index, risk factors, and cardiovascular outcomes.

Results

We studied 1,298 individuals, predominantly women (60.9%), and with mean age of 56.7±13.1 years. Over time, there was a significant increase in physical inactivity, alcohol consumption, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and excessive weight. As for cardiovascular outcomes, we observed an increase in stroke and myocardial revascularization, and a lower frequency of chronic renal failure. During follow-up, there was significant improvement in the rate of BP control (from 29.6% to 39.6%; p = 0.001) and 72 deaths, 91.7% of which were due to cardiovascular diseases.

Conclusion

Despite considerable improvements in the rate of BP control during follow-up, risk factors worsened and cardiovascular outcomes increased.     

类风湿关节炎患者心血管风险的管理

类风湿关节炎(rheumatoid arthritis,RA)患者心血管病发病率和死亡率的风险增加。吸烟、高血压、血脂异常、胰岛素抵抗、糖尿病、肥胖和体力活动缺乏传统危险因素不能完全解释RA心血管风险。炎性反应在RA和心血管病之间起着重要作用,不仅参与动脉粥样硬化的各个阶段:内皮功能障碍、斑块破裂和血栓形成,而且还能加速传统心血管风险,如血脂异常、肥胖和胰岛素抵抗。目前关于RA和心血管病之间确切的发病机制尚不清楚,对RA心血管风险管理是必要的。     

Non-inflammatory Causes of Pain in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Although pain in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is frequently thought to be inflammatory in nature, the association between measures of inflammation and pain intensity is low. This observation is likely due to the multifactorial nature of pain. In addition to pain from joint inflammation, RA patients may also have pain due to structural damage or central etiologies, such as aberrancies in the central nervous system (CNS) pain regulatory pathways. These CNS pathways include mechanisms that facilitate pain, as well as mechanisms that inhibit pain. Other factors, such as sleep disturbances, depression, anxiety, and catastrophizing, may also impact the perception of pain in RA patients. Since pain is frequently used as a proxy for inflammation in the assessment of RA disease activity, it is important that patients and physicians recognize that not all pain is inflammatory, and alternative management strategies, other than escalating disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment, may need to be considered.