Outflow block secondary to stenosis of the inferior vena cava following living-donor liver transplantation?

Although it is well known that outflow block is caused by stenosis or occlusion of hepatic vein anastomoses following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), there have been few reports on inferior vena cava (IVC) stenosis following LDLT. In this paper, we report two cases of IVC stenosis and hepatic vein outflow block following right hepatic LDLT in the absence of stenosis of any of the anastomoses. Both patients presented with liver dysfunction, an ascitic fluid volume of approximately 2000 mL, and congestion in their biopsy specimens, and venocavography demonstrated IVC stenosis with gradients of more than 10 mmHg in patients with a dominant inferior right hepatic vein (IRHV) anastomosis. After a Gianturco expandable metallic stent successfully implanted in the IVC, the patient's liver function recovered and the volume of ascitic fluid decreased. The pathogenesis of hepatic vein outflow block secondary to IVC stenosis following LDLT may involve the anastomosis with the IRHV, which is the dominant draining vein of the graft and larger than the RHV, caudal to the IVC stenosis and a significant IVC pressure gradient that results in increased IRHV pressure. In conclusion, it is important to include hepatic vein outflow block in the differential diagnosis when patients who have undergone right hepatic LDLT in which anastomosis of the large IRHV has been performed develop manifestations of liver dysfunction.     

Donor graft outflow venoplasty in living donor liver transplantation.

Hepatic venous outflow reconstruction is a key to successful living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) because its obstruction leads to graft dysfunction and eventual loss. Inclusion or reconstruction of most draining veins is ideal to ensure graft venous drainage and avoids acute congestion in the donor graft. We developed donor graft hepatic venoplasty techniques for multiple hepatic veins that can be used in either right- or left-lobe liver transplantation. In left-lobe grafts, venoplasty consisting of the left hepatic vein and adjacent veins such as the left superior vein, middle hepatic vein, or segment 3 vein is performed to create a single, wide orifice without compromising outflow for anastomosis with the recipient's vena cava. In right lobe graft where a right hepatic vein (RHV) is adjacent with a significantly-sized segment 8 vein, accessory RHV, and/or inferior RHV, venoplasty of the RHV with the accessory RHV, inferior RHV, and/or segment 8 vein is performed to create a single orifice for single outflow reconstruction with the recipient's RHV or vena cava. Of 35 venoplasties, 2 developed hepatic venous stenoses which were promptly managed with percutaneous interventional radiologic procedures. No graft was lost due to hepatic venous stenosis. In conclusion, these techniques avoid interposition grafts, are easily performed at the back table, simplify graft-to-recipient cava anastomosis, and avoid venous outflow narrowing.     

Techniques of reconstruction of hepatic veins in living-donor liver transplantation, especially for right hepatic vein and major short hepatic veins of right-lobe graft

Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is now widely accepted as a therapeutic option for adult patients with acute and chronic end-stage liver disease. In the early period, the left lobe was the major liver graft used in adult LDLT to ensure donor safety, especially in Eastern countries. However, the frequent extremes of graft-size insufficiency in left-lobe LDLT represented a greater risk of small-for-size graft syndrome in the recipient, which has focused attention on transplantation of the right lobe from a living donor. The major concern of right-lobe LDLT has focused on its safety for the donor and the necessity for including the middle hepatic vein (MHV) in the graft to avoid congestion of the right anterior segment. The MHV carries out important venous drainage for the right anterior segment and is essential for perfect graft function. The decision of whether to take the MHV with the liver graft (extended right lobe graft) or whether to retain it in the donor, with reconstruction of the MHV tributaries in the liver graft (modified right lobe graft) has been extensively discussed in numerous studies. However, adequate right hepatic vein and major short hepatic vein (middle and inferior right hepatic vein [RHV]) drainage of the liver graft is perhaps equally important as MHV outflow drainage for the integrity of right-lobe graft function. Herein, the author describes various techniques of venoplasty of the right hepatic vein (RHV) and the major short hepatic veins to obviate venous outflow obstruction in these veins.     

Intrahepatic venous collaterals formation following outflow block in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation

A right liver graft without the middle hepatic vein (MHV) trunk is now commonly used in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), but it is unclear whether hepatic venous collaterals would develop in clinical patient just after occlusion of hepatic veins. Between January 2005 and October 2006, 56 consecutive adult patients underwent LDLT using right lobe grafts without MHV in our center. Twenty-four patients (42.9%) had MHV tributaries reconstruction. Vascular flow in the graft and interposition vein graft patency was checked by Doppler ultrasonography (US) daily during hospital stay and monthly follow-up after discharge for 2 y. Among 24 cases with MHV reconstruction, interpositional graft block occurred in one case within 7 d after transplantation. A reversed flow in MHV tributaries and collaterals between MHV and right hepatic vein (RHV) was detected by Doppler US. Vessel graft blocks were found in 10 of 22 cases of MHV tributaries reconstruction between 4 to 9 mo after transplantation. Collaterals formation between MHV and RHV developed in 4 of 10 cases of vessel graft block, and their graft function did not deteriorate. In conclusion, nearly half of the patients needed reconstruction of MHV tributaries when a right lobe graft without MHV was used in LDLT. The authors thought that the reconstruction of MHV tributaries should be established when the congested area was dominant by the clamping test or when the diameter of the tributaries was >5 mm. It was found that there may not be any problems if reconstructed vessel graft obstruction was found 3 mo after transplantation, as intrahepatic venous collaterals between MHV and RHV could develop.     

Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Budd-Chiari Syndrome: A Single-Center Experience

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS), which is characterized by hepatic venous outflow obstruction due to occlusion of the major hepatic vein and/or the inferior vena cava (IVC), is rare. Traditionally, a caval resection is advocated for these patients; however, such a manenver renders living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) impossible. We encountered BCS in 4/377 LDLT patients during a 5-year period (January 2003 to December 2007). This report examine the various surgical modifications in these 4 patients, who underwent to LDLT for BCS. Resection of right hepatic vein (RHV) with an adjacent fibrotic part of the IVC with direct anastomosis of the graft RHV to the IVC was performed in 2 patients. One patient underwent retrohepatic IVC excision and reconstruction with a cryopreserved autologous IVC graft. The fourth patient, with a preexisting mesoatrial shunt for BCS, underwent conversion of this to a RHV atrial shunt. Graft and patient survivals were 100%. There were few complications in either donors or recipients. LDLT for BCS can be performed safely with adequate venous drainage techniques and with anticoagulant therapy and good follow-up for early diagnosis and treatment of recurrence leading to excellent long-term results.     

New Left Lobe Transplantation Procedure with Caval Reconstruction Using an Inverted Composite Graft for Chronic Budd-Chiari Syndrome in Living-Donor Liver Transplantation—A Case Report

When the Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) lesion extends to the inferior vena cava (IVC) or the orifices of the hepatic vein, the thickened IVC and/or hepatic vein wall must be removed and IVC reconstruction is required in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). In various reports about IVC resection in LDLT for BCS, there are none about left lobe liver transplantation with reconstruction of the retrohepatic IVC (rhIVC). To overcome removal and reconstruction of the rhIVC in LDLT for BCS, we introduced a composite IVC graft that is applicable to both right and left lobe partial liver grafts for LDLT for BCS. Pathogenic IVC was removed together with the native liver between the lower edge of the right atrium and 5 cm above the renal vein junction with the use of venovenous bypass. The e-polytetrafluoroethylene graft was anastomosed to the suprarenal intact IVC. Then the native part was detached at the level of just above the renal junction. The composite graft was inverted and a half rim of the native part of the graft was anastomosed to the posterior wall of the right atrium. Next, the common venous orifice of the left lobe graft was anastomosed to the wall defect which was composed of the anterior wall of the right atrium and the distal end of the native part of the composite graft. In conclusion, our inverted composite graft technique will overcome the weak points of LDLT for BCS, such as incomplete removal of the pathogenic caval wall and reconstruction of the rhIVC.     

Usefulness of three-dimensional computed tomography in a living-donor extended right lobe liver transplantation

Although living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) of right lobe graft is becoming a popular option for adult patients, management of venous outflow remains controversial. We report a successful extended-right lobe liver transplantation using a recipient's left portal vein as a graft from the middle hepatic vein. Preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) of the donor revealed a small right hepatic vein (RHV) without inferior RHV and a large middle hepatic vein (MHV) draining segments 5 and 8. During the donor operation, right lobe graft was harvested with the MHV, preserving the drainage vein from segment 4. The donor recovered uneventfully except for mild transient hyperbilirubinemia. The recipient's condition rapidly improved, and was discharged from hospital 49 days postoperation. A 3D-CT after LDLT also clearly revealed successful vascular anastomosis. Preoperative and postoperative 3D-CT was useful for determination of the vascular anatomy and the decision about the line of transection in the donor hepatectomy, as well as for evaluation of the vascular anastomoses after transplantation. (Liver Transpl 2002;8:1076-1079.)     

活体右半肝移植的流出道重建21例

目的 探讨活体右半肝移植中的流出道重建技术,预防肝静脉淤血的发生.方法 回顾分析21例成人活体右半肝移植的临床资料.供者标准肝体积为1150.1～1629.8 cm3,供肝重量为585～920 g,与受者标准肝体积比为43%～67%,与受者重量比为0.82%～1.59%,供者残肝体积百分比为32%～55%,供肝大泡脂肪变性均＜10%.对于含肝中静脉的供肝,将肝中静脉和肝右静脉开口修整成尽可能大的三角形开口,供肝植入时,与受者肝右静脉扩大的三角形开口行端侧吻合.不含肝中静脉的供肝,如存在粗大的肝中静脉属支(直径超过5 mm),则用自体或异体血管搭桥(无粗大的肝中静脉属支者采用肝右静脉)与受者腔静脉直接吻合.供肝门静脉右支直接与受者门静脉主干吻合,供肝动脉与受者肝动脉行端端吻合,供肝右肝管与受者肝管行端端吻合.结果 21例供肝中,4例含肝中静脉,17例不含肝中静脉,其中有2例采用自体大隐静脉搭桥,5例采用冷冻的异体髂动脉搭桥,10例采用肝右静脉直接与受者腔静脉吻合.术后1个月,重建肝中静脉属支的7例受者流出道均通畅.含肝中静脉者、不含肝中静脉的血管搭桥者及不含肝中静脉且未使用血管搭桥者术后1年存活率分别为75%、85.7%和70%,三者间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05).术后受者发生胆道并发症7例;发生小肝综合征1例,经脾动脉栓塞治疗后痊愈.术后供者未发生严重并发症,随访6～31个月,均恢复正常工作生活,无一例死亡.结论 含肝中静脉与不含肝中静脉的右半供肝植入后均可取得良好的临床效果.如果右半供肝不含肝中静脉,采用自体或异体血管重建肝中静脉属支是预防肝淤血和保证移植肝功能的有效方法.     

Impact of non-congestive graft size in living donor liver transplantation: new indicator for additional vein reconstruction in right liver graft.

Addition of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) or reconstruction of its tributaries to increase noncongestive graft volume is expected to improve graft function in right liver living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). However, the relationship between noncongestive graft volume and graft function after transplantation has not been clarified and definitive criteria for the reconstruction of MHV tributaries have yet to be established. We analyzed 29 right liver LDLT cases. The noncongestive graft weight was calculated as the total weight of the graft regions drained by hepatic veins reconstructed without postoperative occlusion. We calculated the noncongestive graft-to-recipient weight ratio (ncGRWR) by comparing it to the GRWR. Indocyanine green (ICG) clearance results on days 1 and 3 were significantly correlated with ncGRWR, but not with GRWR. Patients were then divided into 2 groups based on ncGRWR: lower than the median (L-ncGRWR group) and above the median (H-ncGRWR group). ICG clearance in the H-ncGRWR group was significantly better on days 1 and 3. For a different analysis, the patients were again divided into 2 groups, those with and without prolonged cholestasis after transplantation. ncGRWR was significantly lower in patients with prolonged cholestasis, and 7 of 9 patients with an ncGRWR value lower than 0.65 suffered from prolonged cholestasis. Our results demonstrated that the noncongestive volume of a right liver graft has a significant association with early graft function. Further, ncGRWR can play a key role in preoperative determination for additional vein reconstruction of MHV tributaries. When the estimated ncGRWR value with reconstruction of only the right hepatic vein (RHV) (+ inferior right hepatic vein [IRHV]) is less than 0.65, additional vein reconstruction of MHV tributaries should be planned.     

活体肝移植的几点关键外科技术

目的：探讨活体肝移植的几点关键外科技术。方法：2001年1月至2002年3月底,实施活体肝移植11例,其中左半肝8例,左外叶1例,成人右半肝2例;根据术前CT、血管造影和术中B超确定肝切除线,超声电刀离断肝实质,经门静脉灌注原位获取。受体手术采用保留腔静脉的全肝切除。移植肝原位植入,肝静脉重建采用扩大成型吻合技术,显微技术吻合肝动脉,胆道重建采用端端吻合,置“T“管引流。结果：11例供体术后顺利康复出院,未发生严重并发症。11例受体中,1例发生肝动脉血栓形成需再次肝移植,1例因不可逆转的严重排斥反应,于术后72d死亡。10例受体康复出院,肝功能、铜氧化酶恢复正常。结论：活体肝移植对供体是相对安全的。管道重建技术是活体肝移植的重要环节。术前、术中了解供体的解剖变异并正确处理,可降低并发症发生率。     

成人间不含肝中静脉右半肝活体肝移植静脉流出道重建技术的改进

目的 探讨不含肝中静脉(middle hepatic vein,MHV)的成人间右半肝活体肝移植(living donor liver transplantation,LDLT)静脉流出道重建技术的改进方法.方法 通过长征医院器官移植研究所2007年6月至2008年1月完成的11例次成人间不含肝中静脉的右半肝活体肝移植病例的回顾性分析,对成人间不含肝中静脉的右半肝活体肝移植静脉流出道重建技术的改进进行总结.主要技术改进包括:采用供肝右肝静脉、受体腔静脉联合扩大成形吻合技术重建流出道;采用在4℃UW液中保存7 d以内的尸体同种异体静脉移植血管重建供肝Ⅴ、Ⅷ段肝静脉粗大属支以及右肝下静脉.结果 11例次成人间不含肝中静脉右半肝活体肝移植中10例次采用了右肝静脉、腔静脉联合扩大成形吻合技术;利用尸体同种异体静脉移植血管架桥重建肝Ⅴ、Ⅷ段肝静脉以及右肝下静脉流出道的例数占同期实施的成人间活体肝移植总例数的81.8%(9/11),其中架桥重建1支肝静脉7例,架桥重建2支肝静脉1例,架桥重建3支肝静脉1例,11例病人中,1例病人术后14 d死于肾功能衰竭和肺部感染,超声检查血流通畅,未发现架桥静脉血栓,余10例病人术后随访9～15个月,右肝静脉均通畅,未发现静脉血栓,架桥肝静脉累计通畅率为:1个月100%(11/11)、3个月72.7%(8/11)、6个月54.5%(6/11)和9个月36.5%(4/11),移植肝脏再生均衡,右肝端面Ⅴ或Ⅷ段无明显充血和肝萎缩坏死,肝功能正常.超声检查未发现血栓,血流通畅,移植肝脏再生均衡,右肝端面Ⅴ或Ⅷ段无明显充血和肝萎缩坏死,肝功能正常.结论 采用右肝静脉、腔静脉联合扩大成形吻合技术和在4℃UW液中保存7 d以内的尸体同种异体静脉移植血管重建肝Ⅴ、Ⅷ段肝静脉粗大属支以及右肝下静脉是一种简单、安全和有效的成人间不含肝中静脉右半肝活体肝移植肝静脉重建方法.     

An anatomical study of short hepatic veins,with special reference to delineation of the caudate lobe for hanging maneuver of the liver without the usual mobilization

Abstract. Background/Purpose: The present study was designed to anatomically assess a very recently reported hanging maneuver of the liver without mobilization, in which forceps are inserted blindly between the inferior vena cava (IVC) and liver parenchyma. Methods: We dissected 56 formalin-fixed livers (1) to determine whether preservation of the caudate vein (the largest vein draining Spiegel's lobe) and inferior right hepatic vein (IRHV) was possible and (2) to identify the territories drained by other, non-preserved short hepatic veins. Results: A potential space for insertion of the forceps was found between the openings of the caudate vein and IRHV; however, if preservation of both veins is absolutely necessary, we recommended protecting the IRHV, such as by taping and retracting it. We classified the other short hepatic veins into two categories, i.e., those draining the left portal vein territory and those draining the right territory. The distributions of the openings of the veins in these territories overlapped. Conclusions: Clear delineation of the left caudate lobe according to the drainage veins appeared to be difficult when the liver was divided along a straight line in front of the IVC. Received: March 22, 2001 / Accepted: August 21, 2001     

采用不含肝中静脉的右半肝行成人间活体肝移植

目的探讨采用不含肝中静脉的右半肝行成人间活体肝移植的可行性及安全性。方法2002年1月至2005年8月,我院施行了16例成人间右半肝活体肝移植,术中采用了不含肝中静脉的右半肝移植物,同时进行了一系列改良的手术技术包括肝右静脉的重建,右肝下静脉的重建,肝中静脉分支的搭桥等改进。结果全组供者无严重并发症及死亡。前2例受者中,1例发生肝静脉吻合口狭窄,1例因发生小肝综合征,死于肝功进行性恶化。后14例受者中发生并发症5例:急性排斥反应,肝动脉栓塞,胆漏,左膈下脓肿及肺部感染各1例;1例再移植术后肺部感染死于MODS。14例中除肝右静脉与下腔静脉(IVC)直接吻合外,其中5例加行右肝下静脉重建,另5例采用自体大隐静脉搭桥行肝中静脉分支与IVC重建,保证了右肝的流出道通畅。移植物与受者重量比(GRWR)为0.72%~1.15%,11例<1.0%,其中2例<0.8%,无小肝综合征发生。结论采用了改进的手术技术,特别是肝静脉流出道的充分重建可有效的避免小肝综合征,从而使采用不含肝中静脉的活体右半肝移植成为安全可靠的手术方式。     

Living donor liver transplantation for Budd–Chiari syndrome with hepatic inferior vena cava obstruction after open pericardial procedures

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for Budd–Chiari syndrome (BCS) presents a unique challenge as it does not involve replacement of the hepatic inferior vena cava (IVC). We report a case of successful LDLT in a patient with BCS associated with occlusion of the hepatic veins as well as the IVC. A 34-year-old woman with a history of two open pericardial procedures had decompensated liver failure and portal hypertension. Venography showed complete obstruction of the hepatic IVC and well-developed collateral vessels. We performed LDLT via sternotomy and laparotomy, with an end-to-end anastomosis between the left hepatic vein of the donor and the patient’s suprahepatic vena cava in the pericardium. The patient recovered uneventfully and has been doing well for 5 years. LDLT without caval replacement for BCS in a patient with hepatic IVC obstruction is feasible if the patient has good functional collaterals before liver transplantation.     

Utility of Polyethylene Terephthalate (Dacron) Vascular Grafts for Venous Outflow Reconstruction in Living-Donor Liver Transplantations

BackgroundVenous outflow reconstruction of modified right-lobe liver grafts has been shown to prevent the occurrence of graft congestion and subsequent complications, including graft loss. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of Dacron grafts for venous reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).MethodsBetween January 2016 and January 2018, Dacron grafts were used in 148 liver transplants. Of these, 104 patients who had a follow-up computerized tomography (CT) scan were enrolled into the study. A total of 179 outflow hepatic veins including V5, V8, partial middle hepatic vein, and accessory inferior right hepatic veins (IRHV) were reconstructed using synthetic Dacron grafts. Graft patency was evaluated with both intraoperative Doppler ultrasonography following reconstruction, and a follow-up CT was performed on the postoperative day 7 (±1). Retrospective data collection included demographics, parameters for small-for-size (laboratory tests [bilirubin, International Normalized Ratio] and ascites) syndrome, postoperative morbidity, and mortality.ResultsFollow-up CT revealed graft patency in 155 out of 179 (86.6%) vascular grafts. Postoperative seventh-day patency rates for each reconstructed vein were as follows: V5, 87.5% (70/80); V8, 87.7% (50/57); partial middle hepatic vein, 100% (11/11); and IRHV, 77.4% (24/31). No major graft-related complications (early graft dysfunction, graft infection) or graft-related mortality were observed. None of the recipients developed small-for-size syndrome based on laboratory tests and clinical findings.ConclusionsDacron vascular grafts appear as an advantageous and useful alternative for venous outflow reconstruction in LDLT.     

Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of venous collaterals between the middle hepatic vein tributaries and the right hepatic vein in the donor remnant right lobe: Report of a case

We report how three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) showed the development of obvious venous collaterals between the middle hepatic vein (MHV) tributaries and the right hepatic vein (RHV) in the remnant right lobe of a donor liver. The donor was a healthy 34-year-old man who donated the left lobe of his liver with the MHV. The 3D-CT calculated that the total drainage of the MHV tributaries was 413 ml, corresponding to 59% of the total remnant liver. The congestion calculated by 3D-CT decreased from 286 ml on postoperative day (POD) 7 to 28 ml on POD 35, corresponding to 36% and 3% of the total remnant liver, respectively. The donor was discharged from hospital with almost normal liver function, and 3D-CT analysis on POD 35 detected obvious venous collaterals between the MHV tributaries and the RHV. These findings suggest that reconstruction of the MHV tributaries in the donor remnant right lobe may not be necessary.     

改进成人间活体供肝移植的手术技术

目的研究并改进成人间活体供肝移植的手术技术。方法自2002年1月至2005年8月,施行了16例成人间活体右半供肝移植。手术中改进了技术,包括右肝静脉重建、肝中静脉分支搭桥、肝动脉搭桥及胆道吻合等。结果所有供者均无严重并发症及死亡。移植肝与受者重量比（GRWR）为0．72％～1．24％,其中9例〈1．0％,2例〈0．8％。手术除了采用移植肝的右肝静脉与受者下腔静脉（IVC）直接吻合外,5例加行右肝下静脉重建、5例取自体大隐静脉行肝中静脉分支与IVC间搭桥,保证了右肝流出道通畅。最早手术的2例受者中,1例发生肝静脉吻合口狭窄,另1例发生小肝综合征,最终导致死亡。后阶段手术的14例受者均未发生小肝综合征;发生并发症5例,分别为急性排斥反应、肝动脉栓塞、胆漏、左膈下脓肿及肺部感染;1例再次肝移植后因肺部感染,多器官功能衰竭（MOF）死亡。结论活体供肝移植中采用改进的手术技术,特别是肝静脉流出道重建的方法,可有效避免发生小肝综合征。     

Explanted portal vein grafts for middle hepatic vein tributaries in living-donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: The availability of a venous graft is limited in the setting of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), and the management of the middle hepatic vein middle hepatic vein tributaries in right lobe LDLT still remains controversial. METHODS: Twenty-three right lobe LDLT grafts, with the reconstruction of middle hepatic vein tributaries using the explanted portal veins from the explanted livers, were evaluated for the patency, postLDLT liver function tests, and graft survival. RESULTS: The methods of outflow reconstruction were classified into three types: the interposition of the graft to the middle/left hepatic vein (n=12), to the vena cava (n=9), and to the vena cava as a co-orifice with the graft right hepatic vein (n=2). The 1- and 3-year patency rates were 76.7% and 76.7% respectively, with the graft occlusion in five cases. The occluded cases (n=5) had significantly higher aspartate aminotransferase and alanine transaminase levels as compared with those of patent cases (n=18) at 4 weeks after transplantation (P<0.01). However, there was no significant difference in the total bilirubin and prothrombin time in either group during the observation periods. The 1- and 3-year graft survival rates were 91.1% and 91.1%, respectively. In addition, there was no graft loss due to occlusion. CONCLUSION: The use of the recipient's explanted full-length hilar portal vein for the reconstruction of the middle hepatic vein tributaries is thus considered to be a feasible and valuable strategy in the setting of a right lobe LDLT, where appropriate vascular grafts are not always available.     

Adult living donor liver transplantation with right lobe graft: the venous outflow management in the Milan-Niguarda experience

In right lobe living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT), reconstruction of middle hepatic vein (MHV) tributaries is often necessary to avoid severe graft congestion. From March 2001, we performed 36 right lobe ALDLT (segments 5, 6, 7, and 8) without MHV and one pediatric transplant (segments 2 and 3). In the presence of MHV tributaries larger than 5 mm, we intraoperatively evaluated the need for reconstruction. At a mean follow-up of 848 days (range=8-2412), 33/37 transplanted patients are alive with overall patient and graft survivals of 89.2% and 83.8%, respectively. Large MHV tributaries (>5 mm) were present in 10 cases, and inferior right hepatic veins (IRHV) draining segment 6 in 11 cases. In 10 cases, we performed an end-to-side anastomosis between the IRHV and the side of the recipient vena cava. In three cases, the MHV tributaries were end-to-end anastomosed to the stump of the recipient MHV. In all other cases, the vein tributaries were not reconstructed. A computed tomography scan performed from 1 to 3 months after surgery did not show any congested area in the liver parenchyma. In our experience, reconstruction of the MHV tributaries was not always necessary when graft-to-recipient weight ratio is >0.8. Pre- and intraoperative evaluation of the segmental branches of the hepatic vein is crucial to decide about reconstructing these collaterals. Anastomosis of V5 or V8 to the stump of the recipient MHV reduces the number of vascular anastomosis and maintains a physiological angle between these collaterals and the caval vein.     

Validity of preoperative volumetric analysis of congestion volume in living donor liver transplantation using three-dimensional computed tomography.

Reconstruction of middle hepatic vein (MHV) tributaries is controversial in right-lobe living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). This study aimed to evaluate the appropriateness of reconstructing MHV tributaries by volumetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). Between November 2003 and January 2005, 42 donor livers (right-lobe graft, n = 25; left-lobe graft, n = 17) were evaluated using this software. The total congestion volume (CV) associated with the MHV tributaries and the inferior right hepatic vein (IRHV), and graft volume (GV) were calculated. In recipients with right-lobe grafts, CV/(right liver volume [RLV]) and (GV - CV)/(standard liver volume [SLV]) were compared between 2 groups: with reconstruction (n = 16) and without reconstruction (n = 9). To evaluate the influence of CV on the remnant right lobe in donors, total bilirubin was compared between 2 groups: high CV (CV > 20%, n = 13) or low CV (CV < or = 20%, n = 4). The mean CV/RLV ratio was 32.3 +/- 17.1% (V5, 15.2 +/- 9.9%; V8, 9.2 +/- 4.1%; and IRHV, 8.5 +/- 11.4%) and the maximum ratio was as high as 80.8%. The mean (GV - CV)/SLV ratio before reconstruction in patients with or without reconstruction resulted in 33.5 +/- 12.8% and 55.4 +/- 12.9%, respectively (P < 0.01). In donors, total bilirubin was significantly high in the high CV group on postoperative day 1 compared with the low CV group (P < 0.05). In conclusion, calculation of CV using 3D-CT software proved to be very useful. We concluded that this evaluation should be an integral part of procedure planning, especially for right-lobe LDLT.