Effects of heparin, haemodilution and aprotinin on kaolin-based activated clotting time: in vitro comparison of two different point of care devices

BACKGROUND: During cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), measurement of kaolin-based activated clotting time (kACT) is a standard practice in monitoring heparin-induced anticoagulation. Despite the fact that the kACT test from the Sonoclot Analyzer (SkACT) has been commercially available for several years, no published data on the performance of SkACT are available. Thus, the aim of this in vitro study was to compare SkACT with an established kACT from Hemochron (HkACT). METHODS: Blood was withdrawn from 25 patients before elective cardiac surgery. SkACT and HkACT were measured in duplicate after in vitro administration of heparin (0, 1, 2 and 3 U/ml), calcium-free lactated Ringer's solution (25% and 50% haemodilution) and aprotinin (200 kIU/ml). RESULTS: A total of 600 duplicate kACT measurements were obtained from 25 cardiac surgery patients. Overall, mean bias +/- SD between SkACT and HkACT was 7 +/- 70 s (1.3% +/- 14.1%). Administration of heparin, haemodilution and aprotinin induced a comparable effect on both activated clotting time (ACT) tests. Mean bias ranged from -4 +/- 39 s (-1.7% +/- 12.9%) to 4 +/- 78 s (3.2% +/- 15.6%) for heparinzed blood samples after haemodilution or aprotinin application and increased after combined aprotinin administration and haemodilution. After haemodilution and administration of aprotinin, both ACT tests were less reliable for values >480 s in heparinized blood samples. CONCLUSION: Accuracy and performance of SkACT and HkACT were comparable after in vitro administration of heparin, aprotinin and haemodilution. Both ACT tests were considerably affected by aprotinin and haemodilution.     

Monitoring activated clotting time for combined heparin and aprotinin application: in vivo evaluation of a new aprotinin-insensitive test using Sonoclot.

OBJECTIVE: Kaolin-based activated clotting time assessed by HEMOCHRON (HkACT) is a clinical standard for heparin monitoring alone and combined with aprotinin during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). However, aprotinin is known to prolong not only celite-based but also kaolin-based activated clotting time. Overestimation of activated clotting times implies a potential hazardous risk of subtherapeutic heparin anticoagulation. Recently, a novel 'aprotinin-insensitive' activated clotting time test has been developed for the SONOCLOT analyzer (SaiACT). The aim of our study was to evaluate SaiACT in patients undergoing CPB in presence of heparin and aprotinin. METHODS: Blood samples were taken from 44 elective cardiac surgery patients at the following measurement time points: baseline (T0); before CPB after heparinization (T1 and T2); on CPB, before administration of aprotinin (T3); 15, 30, and 60 min on CPB after administration of aprotinin (T4, T5, and T6); after protamine infusion (T7). On each measurement time point, activated clotting time was assessed with HkACT and SaiACT, both in duplicate. Furthermore, the rate of factor Xa inhibition and antithrombin concentration were measured. Statistical analysis was done using Bland and Altman analysis, Pearson's correlation, and ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni-Dunn correction. RESULTS: Monitoring anticoagulation with SaiACT showed reliable readings. Compared to the established HkACT, SaiACT values were lower at all measurement time points. On CPB but before administration of aprotinin (T3), SaiACT values (mean+/-SD) were 44+/-118 s lower compared to HkACT. However, the difference between the two measurement techniques increased significantly on CPB after aprotinin administration (T4-T6; 89+/-152 s, P=0.032). Correlation of ACT measurements with anti-Xa activity was unchanged for SaiACT before and after aprotinin administration (r2=0.473 and 0.487, respectively; P=0.794), but was lower for HkACT after aprotinin administration (r2=0.481 and 0.361, respectively; P=0.041). On CPB after administration of aprotinin, 96% of all ACT values were classified as therapeutic by HkACT, but only 86% of all values were classified therapeutic if ACT was determined by SaiACT. Test variability was comparable for SaiACT and HkACT. CONCLUSIONS: The use of SaiACT may result in more consistent heparin management that is less affected by aprotinin and a corresponding increase in heparin administration for patients receiving aprotinin.     

Monitoring activated clotting time for combined heparin and aprotinin application: an in vitro evaluation of a new aprotinin-insensitive test using SONOCLOT

The kaolin-based activated clotting time (ACT) is commonly used for monitoring heparin-induced anticoagulation alone and combined with aprotinin during cardiopulmonary bypass. However, aprotinin prolongs ACT measurements. Recently, a new so-called 'aprotinin-insensitive' ACT test (SaiACT) has been developed for the SONOCLOT analyzer. In this study we evaluated and compared this new test for the SONOCLOT analyzer in vitro with an established kaolin-based ACT from HEMOCHRON (HkACT). Twenty-five patients undergoing elective valve surgery donated 80 mL of blood after induction of anesthesia. The blood was withdrawn in citrated tubes and processed to analyze effects of heparin (0, 1, 2, and 3 U x mL(-1)), aprotinin (0, 200 kIU x mL(-1)), and 25% hemodilution with calcium-free lactated Ringer's solution on ACT measurements. A total of 400 blood samples were analyzed and ACT was measured in a wide, clinically relevant range in duplicate with SaiACT and HkACT. Addition of aprotinin to heparinized blood samples induced no significant changes of SaiACT measurements. By contrast, HkACT readings increased significantly: aprotinin prolonged HkACT in heparinized blood samples by 20% +/- 37% (2 U x mL(-1)) and 24% +/- 18% (3 U x mL(-1)), respectively, and in vitro hemodilution increased this effect. IMPLICATIONS: Current standard techniques to measure heparin-induced anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass are affected by aprotinin, a drug widely used in this setting. The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro a new, so-called 'aprotinin-insensitive' test from SONOCLOT to measure heparin-induced anticoagulation more reliably in combination with aprotinin.     

在体外及体外循环中抑肽酶对ACT的影响

选择健康献血员及心内直视手术病，观察抑肽酶对全血活化凝血时间的影响。结果：在体外肝素剂量与ＡＣＴ有显著线性相关。抑肽酶单狡应用并不使ＡＣＴ延，但与肝素合用可协同性延长ＡＣＴ值；在体外循环中抑肽酶延长ＡＣＴ的值更为显著，一般超过８００ｓ。结论：抑肽酶可与肝素协同性延长ＡＣＴ，体外循环中应用抑肽酶时应以ＡＣＴ大于８００ｓ作为肝素抗凝标准。     

Heparin monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery using the one-step point-of-care whole blood anti-factor-Xa clotting assay heptest-POC-Hi

The activated clotting time (ACT) generally used for monitoring heparinization during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery does not specifically measure heparin anticoagulant activities. This may result in heparin over- or under-dose and subsequent severe adverse events. A new point-of-care whole blood clotting assay (Heptest POC-Hi [HPOCH]) for quantifying heparin anticoagulant activity specifically was compared with ACT and anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) heparin plasma levels (Coatest heparin) in 125 patients undergoing CPB surgery. The analytical reliability of the HPOCH and the influence of preanalytical variables on assay results were also examined. The ACT and HPOCH clotting times determined throughout the entire observation period correlated closely (n=683; r = 0.80; p < .0001). Similarly, there was a significant linear correlation between HPOCH and Coatest anti-Xa levels (n=352; r = 0.87; p < .0001). Pre- and post-CBP values of HPOCH, ACT, and anti-Xa plasma levels correlated closely with each other (correlation coefficients between r = 0.90 and r = 0.99; p < .0001). During CPB, there was no significant relationship between ACT and whole blood or plasma heparin levels determined by HPOCH (n=157; r = 0.19) and the chromogenic anti-Xa assay (n=157; r = 0.04), respectively. In contrast, HPOCH and anti-Xa plasma levels correlated strongly during CPB (n=157; r = 0.57; p < .0001). However, bias analysis showed that the HPOCH and Coatest heparin could not be used interchangeably. The HPOCH was well reproducible and not influenced by aprotinin, hemodilution, or other factors affecting ACT. The HPOCH seems to be a promising new tool for specific on-site measurement of heparin activities in whole blood during CPB.     

In vitro effect of fresh frozen plasma on the activated coagulation time in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass

The in vitro effect of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) on the whole blood activated coagulation time (ACT) was examined in 18 patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) during coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The addition of FFP to whole blood in vitro, after systemic heparinization, significantly prolonged the ACT from 451 +/- 21 seconds (mean +/- SE) to 572 +/- 41 seconds (P less than 0.05). There was no significant correlation between the plasma antithrombin III activity and the prolongation in ACT after systemic heparinization, with or without addition of FFP. The addition of FFP to whole blood in three of the six patients who exhibited heparin resistance (ACT less than 400 seconds after administration of 350 unit/kg heparin) did not prolong the ACT to greater than 400 seconds. These observations suggest that infusion of FFP will further prolong the ACT after heparin administration in most patients including some with initial heparin resistance.     

High dose thrombin time versus the activated clotting time during cardiopulmonary bypass

In this study we compared the High Dose Thrombin Time (HiTT) with the Activated Clotting Time (ACT) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in non-aprotinin treated patients. On the advice of the HiTT test manufacturer each institution should perform comparative ACT/HiTT assays in the cardiac surgery population. In previous tests our target ACT value of 480 seconds corresponds with a mean HiTT value of 190 seconds. Our results showed that after heparinization (300-400 IU/kg body weight) 8 out of 20 patients did not reach the target ACT of 480 seconds, while the HiTT results in those 8 patients were higher than our target time of 190 seconds. Four heparin pretreated patients who received 400 IU/kg heparin, had relatively low ACT values (467 +/- 14 sec.) and high HiTT values (324 +/- 47 sec.). Before and during CPB there was a poor correlation between the HiTT and ACT (r = 0.38). The results of this study show that for the individual patient the target HiTT of 190 seconds is no guarantee for reaching an adequate ACT of 480 seconds. Although the HiTT may be a very useful assay for monitoring heparin effects during CPB, the determination of the target time can be a point of discussion. In contrast of the advice of the manufacturer we therefore suggest that comparative ACT/HiTT assay should be done in every individual patient to determine a safe target HiTT time, instead of the whole group of patients.     

Safety and efficacy of a heparin removal device: a prospective randomized preclinical outcomes study

BACKGROUND: Systemic protamine sulfate for heparin reversal after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with uncommon, but life-threatening adverse reactions. METHODS: In a prospective randomized 3-day outcomes study, a heparin removal device (HRD) group (n = 12; 60-, 80-, 100-kg subgroups) was compared with a matched systemic Protamine group (Protamine; n = 6) for safety and efficacy using an adult swine model of CPB (60 minutes, 28 degrees C). RESULTS: HRD run time was 25 to 38 minutes depending on weight without complications. After HRD, heparin concentration decreased from 4.77 +/- 0.17 to 0.45 +/- 0.06 U/mL (activated clotting time [ACT] 776 +/- 83 to 180 +/- 12 seconds), and in Protamine, 3.94 +/- 0.63 to 0.13 +/- 0.02 U/mL (ACT 694 +/- 132 to 101 +/- 5 seconds) (p = 0.01 between groups, but no significant differences 60 minutes later). No significant difference between HRD and Protamine to 72 hours was seen in plasma-free hemoglobin C3a, heparin concentration, thromboelastogram index, platelet count, activated partial thromboplastin time, anti-thrombin III, fibrinogen, ACT, and tissue histology. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective randomized outcomes study, HRD achieved predictable reversal of systemic heparinization after CPB with no difference in safety or outcomes compared with protamine.     

The plasma supplemented modified activated clotting time for monitoring of heparinization during cardiopulmonary bypass: a pilot investigation

The standard celite or kaolin activated clotting time (ACT) correlates poorly with heparin levels during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We compared a modified kaolin ACT, in which plasma was supplemented, to a standard undiluted kaolin ACT for monitoring heparin levels during CPB. Fifteen patients undergoing normothermic CPB were enrolled in this prospective study. Heparin management was performed according to the Hepcon HMS results (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN). The ACTs were performed with the ACT II device (Medtronic). Hepcon HMS calculations, standard kaolin ACTs, and plasma supplemented modified ACTs (mACTs), prepared by diluting blood samples 1:1 with human plasma (Behring, Marburg, Germany), were measured every 30 min during CPB. The data obtained were correlated to the plasma chromogenic anti-Xa activity as a reference assay for heparin levels. A total of 64 samples were evaluated. The chromogenic anti-Xa activity ranged from 0.2 to 5.5 IU/mL. The Hepcon HMS calculations ranged from 2.7-8.2 IU/mL of heparin, the standard ACT ranged from 424 to >999 s, and the mACT ranged from 210 to 801 s. The correlation to the chromogenic anti-Xa method was r = 0.43 for the standard kaolin ACT and r = 0.69 for the plasma mACT. The plasma mACT provided an improved correlation to chromogenically measured levels of anti-Xa activity during CPB. The improved correlation most likely results from a correction of the effects of the impairment of the coagulation system caused by hemodilution and consumption of procoagulants on extracorporeal surfaces. IMPLICATIONS: During cardiopulmonary bypass, the plasma modified kaolin activated clotting time (ACT) provides a better correlation with heparin levels than the standard kaolin ACT.     

Reduced inotropic support after aprotinin therapy during pediatric cardiac operations

BACKGROUND: Several reports indicate that aprotinin treatment before and during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) might have a protective effect on the myocardium. We evaluated the hemodynamic effects of perioperative aprotinin treatment. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 34 infants (mean age, 2.5 years) who had cardiac operations. Half of the patients received high-dose aprotinin therapy. There were no significant differences between the aprotinin and placebo groups with respect to age, weight, sex, aortic cross-clamp time, and CPB time. The following data were recorded at arrival in the intensive care unit 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after termination of CPB: heart rate, blood pressure, left atrial pressure, central-peripheral temperature difference, arterial-central venous oxygen saturation difference, urine output, serum creatinine, lactate and neutrophil elastase levels, the Doppler echocardiographic factors shortening fraction and preejection period/left-ventricular ejection time, and cumulative doses of catecholamines (epinephrine), enoximone, and furosemide. RESULTS: No hemodynamic variable showed any significant difference between aprotinin and placebo groups. Urine output, creatinine, lactate, and elastase levels, as well as the cumulative doses of furosemide and epinephrine were not significantly different. Twelve hours after CPB 10 patients in the placebo group and 4 in the aprotinin group had received enoximone (p<0.05). The placebo group had received significantly larger doses of enoximone than the aprotinin group at arrival in the intensive care unit (0.13+/-0.05 versus 0 mg/kg), 12 hours after CPB (0.58+/-0.14 versus 0.18+/-0.09 mg/kg), 24 hours after CPB (1.11+/-0.24 versus 0.42+/-0.16 mg/kg), and 48 hours after CPB (1.61+/-0.40 versus 0.86+/-0.28). At 6 hours the difference did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and hemodynamic status of the aprotinin-treated patients was similar to that of the placebo-treated patients in the first 48 hours after CPB. The placebo group, however, required significantly more inotropic support by enoximone than the aprotinin group to achieve this goal.     

The effect of temperature and aprotinin during cardiopulmonary bypass on three different methods of activated clotting time measurement

The activated clotting time (ACT) is used frequently for monitoring blood anticoagulant response with heparin before, during, and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Many cardiac procedures involving CPB require reduction of the patient's blood temperature and use of the serine protease inhibitor, aprotinin. Three different methods of ACT measurement were compared to show the effects of different CPB temperatures and the presence of aprotinin. A total of 42 patients were included in the study: 14 received CPB at 28 degrees C, 14 received CPB at 32 degrees C, and 14 normothermic (37 degrees C) CPB. Within each temperature group, seven received aprotinin. The ACT in each group of patients was measured by a celite activator (C-ACT), a kaolin activator (K-ACT), and a celite, kaolin and glass activator (MAX-ACT). All three methods of ACT measurement showed significant increases (p < .05) in clotting times at hypothermic CPB compared with normothermic groups. During heparinization the C-ACT was significantly increased (p < .05) in the presence of aprotinin. Comparability between the 3 ACT measurement methods showed a very high correlation between C-ACT and K-ACT clotting times (R2 = .8962), and slightly lower correlation between MAX-ACT and C-ACT (R2 = .7780), and MAX-ACT and K-ACT (R2 = .7827). All ACT measurements are affected by changes in blood temperature. The C-ACT measurement is prolonged with aprotinin, whereas the MAX-ACT and K-ACT method of measurement in the presence of aprotinin are not significantly altered. It appears that the MAX-ACT produces lower values and may necessitate additional heparin therapy for ACT target values considered safe during CPB. Further study is required from these additional findings.     

Evaluation of Point-of-Care ACT Coagulometers and Anti-Xa Activity During Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Objective: The activated clotting time (ACT) is used worldwide to confirm safe heparin anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass. For the present study, the performances of 2 commonly used ACT devices were compared with each other and with anti-Xa levels throughout the surgical procedure in order to understand whether they can be used interchangeably.Design: Prospective study.Setting: Tertiary care center.Participants: The study comprised 33 elective adult cardiac surgical patients.Interventions: Blood samples were taken at standard times throughout the surgery (after induction, after heparin bolus, 4 samples at 30-minute intervals during cardiopulmonary bypass, after protamine), and ACTs and anti-Xa levels were analyzed. Data were compared using receiver operating characteristics and LOESS regression.Measurements and Main Results: The correlation between anti-Xa levels and the Hemochron ACT (Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA) was acceptable (r = 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.757-0.868; p < 0.0001), as was the correlation between anti-Xa levels and the i-STAT (Abbott Point of Care, Abbott Park, IL) (r = 0.81, 95% CI 0.738-0.858; p < 0.0001). The correlation between the 2 ACT methods was poorer (r = 0.77, 95% CI 0.707-0.828; p < 0.0001) than their correlation to anti-Xa levels. When compared with anti-Xa levels, the sensitivity and specificity were mediocre for both devices, although the i-STAT performed better than the Hemochron ACT. The Hemochron ACT read higher values than the i-STAT ACT throughout the course of the surgery.Conclusion: The correlation between the Hemochron ACT and i-STAT ACT is moderate, and they have different sensitivity and specificity when compared with anti-Xa levels. This suggests that ACT devices should not be used interchangeably, but cut-off values for safe anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass should be determined for each type of device, particularly when switching supplier.     

Hemostatic Activation and Inflammatory Response during Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Impact of Heparin Management

Background: Cardiac surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) leads to fulminant activation of the hemostatic-inflammatory system. The authors hypothesized that heparin concentration-based anticoagulation management compared with activated clotting time-based heparin management during CPB leads to more effective attenuation of hemostatic activation and inflammatory response. In a randomized prospective study, the authors compared the influence of anticoagulation with a heparin concentration-based system (Hepcon HMS; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) to that of activated clotting time-based management on the activation of the hemostatic-inflammatory system during CPB.

Methods: Two hundred elective patients (100 in each group) undergoing standard cardiac surgery in normothermia were enrolled. No antifibrinolytic agents or aprotinin and no heparin-coated CPB systems were used. Samples were collected after administration of the heparin bolus before initiation of CPB and after conclusion of CPB before protamine infusion.

Results: There were no differences in the pre-CPB values between both groups. After CPB there were significantly higher concentrations (P < 0.05) for heparin and a significant reduction in thrombin generation (25.2 +/- 21.0 SD vs. 34.6 +/- 25.1), d-dimers (1.94 +/- 1.74 SD vs. 2.58 +/- 2.1 SD), and neutrophil elastase (715.5 +/- 412 SD vs. 856.8 +/- 428 SD), and a trend toward lower [beta]-thromboglobulin, C5b-9, and soluble P-selectin in the Hepcon HMS group. There were no differences in the post-CPB values for platelet count, adenosine diphosphate-stimulated platelet aggregation, antithrombin III, soluble fibrin, Factor XIIa, or postoperative blood loss.     

Does high-dose methylprednisolone in aprotinin-treated patients attenuate the systemic inflammatory response during coronary artery bypass grafting procedures?

OBJECTIVE: To discover the possible effects of methylprednisolone on the systemic inflammatory response during aprotinin treatment. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blinded study. SETTING: University-affiliated heart center. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-two patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting. INTERVENTIONS: In the methylprednisolone group (n = 26), 1 g of methylprednisolone was administered 30 minutes before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The 26 control patients received a placebo instead. High-dose aprotinin was administered to all participants. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After CPB, the concentration of the proinflammatory cytokines, interleukin-6 and interleukin-8, was significantly less in the methylprednisolone group. The anti-inflammatory interleukin-10 concentration was, in contrast, greater. After CPB, PaO2 was greater in the methylprednisolone group (245+/-17 v 195+/-16 mmHg). Dynamic pulmonary compliance was also greater, whereas the alveolar-arterial oxygen difference was less (376+/-17 v 428+/-16 mmHg). On arrival in the intensive care unit, the oxygen delivery index was greater in the methylprednisolone group (62+/-2.7 v 54+/-2.3 mL/min/m2) and the oxygen extraction rate was less (25%+/-0.02% v 30%+/-0.02%). After CPB, the cardiac index was significantly greater in the methylprednisolone group (4.1+/-0.2 v 3.6+/-0.2 L/min/m2). These patients had less blood loss postoperatively (616+/-52 v 833+/-71 mL; p = 0.017) and a greater urine output (8,015+/-542 v 6,417+/-423 mL/24 h; p = 0.024). CONCLUSION: The use of methylprednisolone attenuates the systemic inflammatory response during aprotinin treatment and improves clinical outcome parameters.     

The impact of renal dysfunction on aprotinin pharmacokinetics during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor that undergoes metabolism in the kidney. Because elimination is almost entirely renal, the clearance of aprotinin may be reduced in patients with renal insufficiency. Unfortunately, there are no data regarding aprotinin pharmacokinetics in cardiac surgical patients with renal insufficiency or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We, therefore, determined the clearance (ApCl) and elimination half-life (T1/2) of aprotinin in 26 cardiac surgical patients with normal and abnormal renal function (creatinine clearance [CrCl] 0-122 mL/min) undergoing CPB. Subjects were given a 2 million kallikrein inhibiting unit (KIU) initial dose of aprotinin, followed by a 0.25 million KIU/h infusion. No aprotinin was added to the pump prime. Plasma aprotinin concentrations were sampled at 30 min after completion of the loading dose, 30 and 60 min after the onset of CPB, at the end of CPB, and at 8, 24, and 32 h after completion of the loading dose. ApCl was directly related and the elimination T1/2 inversely related to CrCl (r = 0.75 and 0.42, respectively). In patients with a CrCl >50 mL/min, the T1/2 and ApCl were 7.8 h and 53 mL/min, respectively, compared with 19.9 h and 25 mL/min (P < 0.05, P < 0.002, respectively) for patients with ESRD. In conclusion, ApCl is reduced, and T1/2 is prolonged in patients with renal insufficiency or ESRD undergoing CPB. Dosing modifications may be necessary for patients with abnormal renal function undergoing cardiac surgery. IMPLICATIONS: Because aprotinin is metabolized and eliminated in the kidney, its clearance may be reduced in patients with renal insufficiency. Our data suggest that aprotinin clearance is reduced, and aprotinin half-lives are prolonged in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing CPB. Dosing modification may therefore be indicated when aprotinin is administered to these patients for cardiac surgery.     

Dose requirements of infusions of cisatracurium or rocuronium during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass

We investigated the influence of mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on the dose requirements of cisatracurium or rocuronium used as a continuous infusion. We studied eight patients given cisatracurium and nine given rocuronium. They were ASA class III and IV and scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting. Neuromuscular transmission was monitored electromyographically. After recovery of T1/T0 to 10%, a cisatracurium infusion or a rocuronium infusion was started at a rate of 1.5 or 10 micrograms kg-1 min-1, respectively, and adjusted to maintain T1/T0 at 15%. Infusion rate and duration were recorded before, during and after CPB in each patient and the mean infusion rates were calculated. One-way ANOVA showed a statistically significant difference between the cisatracurium infusion rates before, during and after CPB: A T1/T0 of 15% could be achieved with a mean infusion rate of 1.1, 0.75 and 0.98 micrograms kg-1 min-1 before, during and after CPB, respectively. There was no significant difference between the rocuronium infusion rates before, during and after CPB. The mean rocuronium infusion rate required to maintain T1/T0 at 15% throughout the procedure was 4.1 micrograms kg-1 min-1. Cisatracurium infusion rates should be halved during CPB. Even after CPB, requirements are reduced. The same tendency occurs with rocuronium, but the changes in infusion rate were not statistically significant.     

The relationship between hirudin and activated clotting time: implications for patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia undergoing cardiac surgery.

Anticoagulation with recombinant hirudin (r-hirudin) (Refludan) has been suggested as an alternative to heparin for patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia requiring cardiac surgery. We sought to develop a modified activated coagulation time (ACT) that would allow quantification of the levels of r-hirudin required during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Twenty-one patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgical procedures requiring CPB were enrolled in this IRB-approved study. R-hirudin was added to blood specimens obtained before heparin administration (before CPB) and 30 min after heparin neutralization with protamine (after CPB) to result in concentrations of 0, 2, 4, 6, 7, or 8 microg/mL. Kaolin/ACT and complete blood count measurements were assayed in native specimens (first 10 patients, Phase I) or in specimens mixed with equal volumes of commercial normal plasma (second 11 patients, Phase II). In Phase I, good (r(2) = 0.83) linear relationships between ACT values and r-hirudin concentrations (< or =4 microg/mL) were observed in specimens obtained before CPB. However, ACT values were markedly prolonged (P < 0.0001) by r-hirudin in specimens obtained after CPB, with ACT values generally exceeding the ACT's detection limit (>999 s) at hirudin concentrations >2 microg/mL. In patient specimens mixed with normal plasma (Phase II), ACT/hirudin relationships (i.e., hirudin/ACT slope values obtained with hirudin concentration < or =4 microg/mL) in the post-CPB period (0.022 +/- 0.004 microg. mL(-1). s(-1)) were similar (P = 0.47) to those (0.019 +/- 0.004 microg. mL(-1). s(-1)) obtained in the pre-CPB period. Accordingly, a significant relationship between normal plasma-supplemented ACT values and predilution hirudin concentration was obtained in the post-CPB (hirudin = 0.039ACT - 4.34, r(2) = 0.91) period. Although our data demonstrate that the ACT test cannot be used to monitor hirudin during CPB, the addition of 50% normal plasma to post-CPB hemodiluted blood specimens yields a consistent linear relationship between hirudin concentration and ACT values up to a predilution concentration of 8 microg/mL. Plasma-modified ACT may be useful in monitoring hirudin anticoagulation during CPB. Implications: A modified activated clotting time test system that may be helpful in monitoring hirudin anticoagulation in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass is described.     

Uncalibrated arterial pulse contour analysis versus continuous thermodilution technique: effects of alterations in arterial waveform

OBJECTIVE: To compare an arterial pressure-derived cardiac output (APCO) (Vigileo software version 1.07; Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) and a thermodilution cardiac output (CCO) as methods for measuring cardiac output under different pathologic and experimental conditions that induce changes in arterial waveform morphology. DESIGN: A prospective study. SETTING: A university hospital, single institutional. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-two patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Simultaneous APCO and CCO were compared in low-risk patients undergoing elective coronary artery surgery (without valvular disease) (control, n = 20), patients with aortic stenosis (AS, n = 10), aortic insufficiency (AI, n = 10), and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP, n = 12). In the control group, additional data were registered before and after median sternotomy and phenylephrine administration. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In the control group, Bland-Altman showed a bias of -3% (95% limits of agreement: -59% to +53%) before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and of -1% (95% limits of agreement: -51% to +50%) after CPB. In the AS group, the bias was -5% (95% limits of agreement: -34% to +24%) before CPB and 1% (95% limits of agreement: -28 to +30%) after CPB. In the AI group bias was +32% (95% limits of agreement: -4% to +68%) before CPB and -2% (95% limits of agreement: -35% to +32%) after CPB. Median sternotomy decreased CCO by 10% +/- 10%, whereas it increased APCO by 56% +/- 28%. Phenylephrine administration decreased CCO by 11% +/- 16%, whereas it increased APCO by 55% +/- 34%. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac output measurement based on uncalibrated pulse contour analysis is able to reflect cardiac output measured with the continuous thermodilution method in patients undergoing uncomplicated coronary artery surgery. However, in situations in which the arterial pressure waveform is changed, agreement between techniques may be altered and data obtained with uncalibrated pulse contour analysis may become less reliable.     

The in vitro effects of aprotinin on twelve different ACT tests

Aprotinin is frequently used during CPB to reduce post-operative bleeding and attenuate the inflammatory response. The level of anticoagulation in these patients is monitored by using various activated clotting time (ACT) tests, which are generally accepted as being altered by the presence of aprotinin in blood. Therefore, we have investigated the effect of aprotinin on several ACT tests using whole blood from CPB patients. With IRB approval, blood samples were collected from patients undergoing CPB before and after full heparinization (300 u/kg). Each blood sample was divided into two aliquots, and aprotinin was added to one of them to yield a final calculated concentration of 300 KIU/mL. Both aliquots were used simultaneously to perform the 12 ACT tests. A paired Student's t-test was performed on the data. Overall, test results from 9 of 12 devices were significantly increased by aprotinin. Of these, four were increased only when the sample was heparinized, three were elevated by both heparinized and unheparinized blood, and two were elevated only when the sample was unheparinized. Each affected test responded uniquely to aprotinin, producing ACT test results ranging from 12 to 51% above nonaprotinized values. Several tests that were affected by aprotinin using heparinized blood samples were unaffected using unheparinized blood samples. These data emphasizes the unique manner in which individual ACT tests respond to aprotinized blood samples and should be considered when developing institutional policy for anticoagulation of aprotinized patients.     

Aprotinin reduces the IL-8 after coronary artery bypass grafting.

The effect of aprotinin, a protease inhibitor, on myocardial interleukin-8 (IL-8) production after ischemia-reperfusion injury was investigated. Twenty patients who had elective coronary artery bypass grafting were included in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (n = 10 in each). Group A patients received high dose aprotinin (20,000 IU/kg as pretreatment followed by 7500 IU/kg for 6 h) and Group B patients received normal saline as a control. Serum IL-8 levels after the termination of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) showed a significant improvement in aprotinin treated group compared to control group (70 +/- 42.6 vs 360.71 +/- 87.9 ng/ml) (P < 0.005). Levels were also significantly higher at post-operative 24th hour in patients who did not received aprotinin (340.16 +/- 92.10 vs 96.13 +/- 34.33 ng/ml). However at post-operative 48th hour levels were again higher in control (untreated) group, but the difference was not statistically significant (78.8 +/- 34.4 vs 42.8 +/- 9.29 ng/ml).Aprotinin prevented the IL-8 release from myocytes in ischemia-reperfusion injury. The mechanism is highly dependent on anti-protease activity of aprotinin.