Role of ultrasound shear wave elastography in preoperative prediction of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BackgroundMajority of predictors of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) use intraoperative variables. We aimed to study the role of preoperative ultrasound shear wave elastography (USWE) to predict POPF.MethodsThe consecutive patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) between January 2019 to March 2020 were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent USWE assessment at the pancreatic neck level. Intraoperative variables including pancreatic texture, pancreatic duct diameter, blood loss and histological grading of fibrosis were also recorded. Associations between USWE and intraoperative variables and histological grading with the development of POPF were analyzed.ResultsOf the 62 patients assessed, 50 patients (mean age: 53 ± 14 years; 31 males) were included. POPF and clinically relevant POPF (CRPOPF) were observed in 22 (44%) and 7 (14%) patients respectively. Soft pancreas was an independent predictor of CRPOPF (p = 0.04). The mean USWE valve was significantly lower in patients with CRPOPF as compared to no CRPOPF (9.7 Kpa vs. 12.8Kpa, p = 0.016). At receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, USWE value of 12.65Kpa yielded sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 47%, respectively, for prediction of CRPOPF. USWE showed significant correlation with intraoperative pancreatic texture (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ) = 0.565, p = 0.001).ConclusionUSWE helps in preoperative prediction of CRPOPF. This may further help to customize management strategy in high risk patients.     

Preoperative fecal elastase-1 (FE-1) adds value in predicting post-operative pancreatic fistula: not all soft pancreas share the same risk – A prospective analysis on 105 patients

BackgroundScores predicting postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) mainly use intraoperative predictors. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of pancreatic exocrine function expressed by fecal elastase (FE-1) as preoperative predictor of POPF.MethodsPatients scheduled for PD at the Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital, from April 2017 to July 2018 were prospectively enrolled. FE-1 was measured in a preoperative stool sample through an ELISA test.ResultsThe study population consisted of 105 patients. The POPF rate was 17.1%. Patients developing POPF showed high values of FE-1 (454 vs 155 mcg/g; p < 0.01), and FE-1 was an independent predictor of POPF (OR 1.008, CI 95% 1.003–1.014; p < 0.01), even considering only patients with a “soft” texture. A cut-off value of 260 mcg/g presented 100% sensitivity and 64.3% specificity (AUC 0.83) in predicting POPF. Approximately 30% of patients with a “soft” pancreatic texture presented with FE-1 < 260 mcg/g and did not develop POPF.ConclusionFE-1 is a promising tool to preoperatively assess the risk of POPF after PD. Further studies with larger populations are needed to potentially incorporate FE-1 into risk scores for PD with better stratification.     

Somatostatin analogues and the risk of post-operative pancreatic fistulas after pancreatic resection - A systematic review & meta-analysis

BackgroundPost-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a common complication of pancreatic resection. Somatostatin analogues (SA) have been used as prophylaxis to reduce its incidence. The aim of this study is to appraise the current literature on the effects of SA prophylaxis on the prevention of POPF following pancreatic resection.MethodsThe review of the literature was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data from studies that reported the effects of SA prophylaxis on POPF following pancreatic resection were extracted, to determine the effect of SA on POPF morbidity and mortality.ResultsA total of 15 studies, involving 2221 patients, were included. Meta-analysis revealed significant reductions in overall POPF (Odds ratio: 0.65 (95% CI 0.53–0.81, p < 0.01)), clinically significant POPF (Odds ratio: 0.53 (95% CI 0.34–0.83, p < 0.01)) and overall morbidity (OR: 0.69 (95% CI: 0.50–0.95, p = 0.02)) following SA prophylaxis. There is no evidence that SA prophylaxis reduces mortality (OR: 1.10 (95%CI: 0.68–1.79, p = 0.68)).ConclusionSA prophylaxis following pancreatic resection reduces the incidence of POPF. However, mortality is unaffected.     

Multifactorial mitigation strategy to reduce clinically relevant pancreatic fistula in high-risk pancreatojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy

IntroductionPostoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most dreadful complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and previous literature focused on technical modifications of pancreatic remnant reconstruction. We developed a multifactorial mitigation strategy (MS) and the aim of the study is to assess its clinical impact in patients at high-risk of POPF.MethodsAll patients candidate to PD between 2012 and 2018 were considered. Only patients with a high Fistula Risk Score (FRS 7–10) were included. Patients undergoing MS were compared to patients receiving Standard Strategy (SS). Clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Multivariate hierarchical logistic regression analyses were performed to detect independent predictors of POPF.ResultsOut of 212 patients, 33 were finally included in MS Group and 29 in SS Group. POPF rate was significantly lower in MS Group (12.1% vs 44.8%, p = 0.005). Delayed gastric emptying, postoperative pancreatitis, complications and hospital stay were also significantly lower in MS Group. Hierarchical logistic regression analyses showed that Body Mass Index (OR = 1.196, p = 0.036) and MS (OR = 0.187, p = 0.032) were independently associated with POPF.ConclusionA multifactorial MS can be helpful to reduce POPF rate in patients with high FRS following PD. Personalized approach for vulnerable patients should be investigated in the future.     

Nomogram for predicting postoperative pancreatic fistula

BackgroundPrevious studies analyzed risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and developed risk prediction tool using scoring system. However, no study has built a nomogram based on individual risk factors. This study aimed to evaluate individual risks of POPF and propose a nomogram for predicting POPF.MethodsFrom 2007 to 2016, medical records of 1771 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenctomy were reviewed retrospectively. Variables with p < 0.05 in multivariate logistic regression analysis were included in the nomogram. Internal performance validation was executed using a repeated cross validation method.ResultsOf 1771 patients, 222 (12.5%) experienced POPF. In multivariable analysis, sex (p = 0.004), body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.001), ASA score (p = 0.039), preoperative albumin (p = 0.035), pancreatic duct diameter (p = 0.002), and location of tumor (p < 0.001) were identified as independent predictors for POPF. Based on these six variables, a POPF nomogram was developed. The area under the curve (AUC) estimated from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) graph was 0.709 in the train set and 0.652 in the test set.ConclusionsA POPF nomogram was developed. This nomogram may be useful for selecting patients who need more intensified therapy and establishing customized treatment strategy.     

Risk scoring system and predictor for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy

AIM: To establish a scoring system to predict clinicallyrelevant postoperative pancreatic fistula(CR-POPF)after pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD).METHODS: The clinical records of 921 consecutive patients who underwent PD between 2008 and 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. Postoperative pancreatic fistula(POPF) was defined and classified by the international study group of pancreatic fistula(ISGPF).We used a logistic regression model to determine the independent risk factors of CR-POPF and developed a scoring system based on the regression coefficient of the logistic regression model. The optimal cut-off value to divide the risk strata was determined by the Youden index. The patients were divided into two groups(low risk and high risk). The independent sample t test was used to detect differences in the means of drain amylase on postoperative day(POD) 1, 2 and 3. The optimal cut-off level of the drain amylase to distinguish CR-POPF from non-clinical POPF in the two risk strata groups was determined using the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curves.RESULTS: Grade A POPF occurred in 106(11.5%)patients, grade B occurred in 57(6.2%) patients,and grade C occurred in 32(3.5%) patients. A predictive scoring system for CR-POPF(0-6 points) was constructed using the following four factors: 1 point for each body mass index ≥ 28 [odds ratio(OR) = 3.86;95% confidence interval(CI): 1.92-7.75, P = 0.00],soft gland texture(OR = 4.50; 95%CI, 2.53-7.98, P =0.00), and the difference between the blood loss and transfusion in operation ≥ 800 mL(OR = 3.45; 95%CI,1.92-7.75, P = 0.00); and from 0 points for a 5 mm or greater duct diameter to 3 points for a less than 2 mm duct(OR = 8.97; 95%CI: 3.70-21.77, P = 0.00). The ROC curve showed that the area under the curve of this score was 0.812. A score of 3 points was suggested to be the best cut-off value(Youden index = 0.485). In the low risk group, a drain amylase level ≥ 3600 U/L on POD3 could distinguish CR-POPF from non-clinicalPOPF(the sensitivity and specificity were 75% and85%, respectively). In the high risk group, the best cutoff was a drain amylase level of 1600(the sensitivity and specificity were 77 and 63%, respectively).CONCLUSION: A 6-point scoring system accurately predicted the occurrence of CR-POPF. In addition, a drain amylase level on POD3 might be a predictor of this complication.     

Rapid postoperative reduction in prognostic nutrition index is associated with the development of pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy

BackgroundsDespite recent advances in surgical techniques and devices for pancreatic remnant closure, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) still remains one of the common complications after distal pancreatectomy (DP). Identification of risk factors for POPF may lead to the development of new strategies to prevent this ominous complication.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed data on 44 patients undergoing DP with the use of a stapler to identify risk factors for POPF. Study variables included preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and reduction rate of PNI on postoperative day (POD) 7.ResultsPOPF occurred in 23 patients (52%), of which 13 (56%) were grade B or C. Univariate analyses comparing patients with POPF and those without POPF showed significant differences in body mass index (P = 0.0102), pancreatic thickness (P = 0.0134), white blood cell count on POD7 (P = 0.0432), C-reactive protein level on POD7 (P = 0.0123), and PNI reduction rate (P = 0.0471). A multivariate analysis revealed pancreatic thickness (P = 0.0121) and PNI reduction rate (P = 0.0165) to be significant factors for POPF. Furthermore, the PNI reduction rate was significantly higher in patients with clinically relevant (grade B/C) POPF than in those with no or grade A POPF (P = 0.0257). In most patients, the massive postoperative PNI reduction preceded the diagnosis of clinically relevant POPF.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that rapid postoperative reduction in PNI is associated with the development of POPF.     

Pure biliary leak vs. pancreatic fistula associated: non-identical twins following pancreatoduodenectomy

BackgroundBiliary leak (BL) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) may have diffrent severity depending on its association with postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF).MethodsData of 2715 patients undergoing PD between 2011 and 2020 at two European third-level referral Centers for pancreatic surgery were retrospectively reviewed. These included BL incidences, grading, outcomes, specific treatments, and association with POPF.ResultsBL occurred in 6% of patients undergoing PD. Among 143 BL patients, 47% had an associated POPF and 53% a pure BL. Major morbidity (64% vs 36%) and mortality (19% vs 4%) were higher in POPF-associated BL group (all P< 0.01). Day of BL onset was similar between groups (POD 2 vs 3; P = 0.2), while BL closure occurred earlier in pure BL (POD 12 vs 23; P < 0.01). Conservative treatment was more frequent (55% vs 15%; P < 0.01), and the rate of percutaneous and/or trans-hepatic drain placement was lower (30% vs 16%; P = 0.04) in pure BL group. Relaparotomy was more common in POPF-associated BL group (42% VS 17%; P < 0.01) but was performed earlier in pure BL (POD 2 vs 10; P = 0.02).ConclusionsPure BL represents a more benign entity, managed conservatively in half of the cases.     

Continuous suture of the pancreatic stump and Braun enteroenterostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy

AIM:To investigate a new modification of pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD)-a mesh-like running suturing of the pancreatic remnant and Braun’s enteroenterostomy.METHODS:Two hundred and three patients underwent PD from 2009 to 2014 and were classified into two groups:Group A(98 patients),who received PD with a mesh-like running suturing for the pancreatic remnant,and Braun’s enteroenterostomy; and Group B(105 patients),who received standard PD.Demographic data,intraoperative findings,postoperative morbidity and perioperative mortality between the two groups were compared by univariate and multivariate analysis.RESULTS:Demographic characteristics between Group A and Group B were comparable.There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning perioperative mortality,and operative blood loss,as well as the incidence of the postoperative morbidity,including reoperation,bile leakage,intraabdominal fluid collection or infection,and postoperative bleeding.Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula(POPF) and delayed gastric emptying(DGE) were identified more frequently in Group B than in Group A.Technique A(PD with a mesh-like running suturing of the pancreatic remnant and Braun’s enteroenterostomy) was independently associated with decreased clinicallyrelevant POPF and DGE,with an odds ratio of 0.266(95%CI:0.109-0.654,P =0.004) for clinically relevant POPF and 0.073(95%CI:0.010-0.578,P =0.013) for clinically relevant DGE.CONCLUSION:An additional mesh-like running suturing of the pancreatic remnant and Braun’s enteroenterostomy during PD decreases the incidence of postoperative complications and is beneficial for patients.     

Histological pancreatic findings correlate with computed tomography attenuation and predict postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy

BackgroundAlthough a soft pancreas is a widely-accepted reliable risk factor for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), there is no established preoperative evaluation of pancreatic texture.MethodsTwo hundred thirty-seven patients who underwent PD with histological pancreatic assessment were retrospectively enrolled. The degree of fibrosis and fatty infiltration was scored histologically as seven grades and five grades, respectively. Computed tomography (CT) attenuation of the pancreas was measured on preoperative unenhanced CT images. Correlations between the CT attenuation of the pancreas and the histological pancreatic findings, and the development of POPF were analyzed.ResultsThe fibrosis grade was significantly higher for hard pancreas than for soft pancreas (p < 0.001), whereas the fatty infiltration grade was similar between the two types (p = 0.161). CT attenuation of the pancreas was inversely correlated with both fibrosis grade (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient ([r] = ?0.609, p < 0.001) and fatty infiltration grade (r = ?0.382, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that body mass index ≥25 kg/m² (odds ratio [OR]: 5.64, p < 0.001) and fibrosis grade ≤2 (OR: 18.0, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for clinically significant POPF.ConclusionHistological pancreatic texture can be evaluated with CT attenuation and might be helpful in preoperatively predicting the development of POPF after PD.     

Serum amylase on the night of surgery predicts clinically significant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Objectives

Drainage after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains controversial because the risk for uncontrolled postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) must be balanced against the potential morbidity associated with prolonged and possibly unnecessary drainage. This study investigated the utility of the level of serum amylase on the night of surgery [postoperative day (PoD) 0 serum amylase] to predict POPF.

Methods

A total of 185 patients who underwent PD were studied. Occurrences of POPF were graded using the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified a threshold value of PoD 0 serum amylase associated with clinically significant POPF (ISGPF Grades B and C) in a test cohort (n = 45). The accuracy of this threshold value was then tested in a validation cohort (n = 140).

Results

Overall, 43 (23.2%) patients developed clinically significant POPF. The threshold value of PoD 0 serum amylase for the identification of clinically significant POPF was ≥130 IU/l (P = 0.003). Serum amylase of <130 IU/l had a negative predictive value of 88.8% for clinically significant POPF (P < 0.001). Serum amylase of ≥130 IU/l on PoD 0 and a soft pancreatic parenchyma were independent risk factors for clinically significant POPF.

Conclusions

Postoperative day 0 serum amylase of <130 IU/l allows for the early and accurate categorization of patients at least risk for clinically significant POPF and may identify patients suitable for early drain removal.     

Division of the pancreas at the neck reduces postoperative pancreatic fistula in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: Comparison of pancreatic division at the body

Backgroundobjectives: During laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), the optimal site for pancreatic division with consideration of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is unclear. We evaluate which site of pancreatic division, neck or body, has better outcomes after LDP.MethodsThis was a retrospective, observational study. LDP was performed in 102 consecutive patients between December 2009 and May 2020. After excluding 14 patients with pancreatic division at tail, 88 patients (pancreatic division at neck n = 46, at body n = 42) were included in this study. Short- and long-term outcomes after LDP were compared between pancreatic division at neck and body.ResultsThe pancreatic transection site was thicker at body than at neck (17.5 vs. 11.9 mm, P < 0.001), although there were no significant differences of pancreatic texture and pancreatic duct size. The Grade B/C POPF rate was significantly higher when the pancreas was divided at body than when divided at neck (21.4 vs. 6.5%, P = 0.042). We found no significant differences between pancreatic division at neck and body in residual pancreatic volume (34.0 vs. 34.8 ml, P = 0.855), incidence of new-onset or worsening diabetes mellitus more than six months after LDP (P = 0.218), or body weight change (six-month: P = 0.116, one-year: P = 0.108, two-year: P = 0.195, tree-year: P = 0.131, four-year: P = 0.608, five-year: P = 0.408).ConclusionThis study suggests that the pancreatic division at neck might reduce the Grade B/C POPF incidence after LDP, compared to division at body. A potential reason is that the pancreas at body is thicker than that at neck. However, further large-scale studies are necessary to confirm our results.     

Density and enhancement of the pancreatic tail on computer tomography predicts acinar score and pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy

BackgroundAcinar score calculated at the pancreatic resection margin is associated with postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). The present study evaluates the association between (i) computed tomography (CT) density of the pancreas and the acinar score of the pancreatic resection margin, and (ii) CT density of the pancreas and POPF after PD.MethodsConsecutive patients who underwent PD were included for analysis. CT densities of the pancreatic head, neck, body and tail were measured in non-contrast (NC), arterial (ART) and portal venous (PV) phases. Histologic slides of the pancreatic resection margin were scored for acinar cell density.ResultsNinety patients were included for analysis. Non-contrast density of the pancreatic tail was a good predictor of POPF (AUROC 0.704, p = 0.036), and a cut-off value of >40 Hounsfield units predicted POPF with 70.0% sensitivity and 73.4% specificity. The ratio of densities between PV and NC phases in the pancreatic tail was also a good predictor of POPF (AUROC 0.712, p = 0.030), and a cut-off value of <2.29 predicted POPF with 70.9% sensitivity and 80% specificity.ConclusionNon-contrast CT density of the pancreatic tail correlates with acinar cell density of the pancreatic resection margin and predicts the development of POPF after PD.     

Analysis of risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy

AIM: To explore the morbidity and risk factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) following pancreaticoduodenectomy.METHODS: The data from 196 consecutive patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, performed by different surgeons, in the General Hospital of the People’s Liberation Army between January 1^st, 2013 and December 31^st, 2013 were retrospectively collected for analysis. The diagnoses of POPF and clinically relevant (CR)-POPF following pancreaticoduodenectomy were judged strictly by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition. Univariate analysis was performed to analyze the following factors: patient age, sex, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, diabetes mellitus, serum CA19-9 level, history of jaundice, serum albumin level, blood loss volume, pancreatic duct diameter, pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreatic drainage and pancreaticojejunostomy. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the main independent risk factors for POPF.RESULTS: POPF occurred in 126 (64.3%) of the patients, and the incidence of CR-POPF was 32.7% (64/196). Patient characteristics of age, sex, BMI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, serum CA19-9 level, history of jaundice, serum albumin level, blood loss volume, pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy and pancreaticojejunostomy showed no statistical difference related to the morbidity of POPF or CR-POPF. Pancreatic duct diameter was found to be significantly correlated with POPF rates by univariate analysis and multivariate regression analysis, with a pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm being an independent risk factor for POPF (OR = 0.291; P = 0.000) and CR-POPF (OR = 0.399; P = 0.004). The CR-POPF rate was higher in patients without external pancreatic stenting, which was found to be an independent risk factor for CR-POPF (OR = 0.394; P = 0.012). Among the entire patient series, there were three postoperative deaths, giving a total mortality rate of 1.5% (3/196), and the mortality associated with pancreatic fistula was 2.4% (3/126).CONCLUSION: A pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm is an independent risk factor for POPF. External stent drainage of pancreatic secretion may reduce CR-POPF mortality and POPF severity.     

Prediction of post-operative pancreatic fistula in pancreaticoduodenectomy patients using pre-operative MRI: a pilot study

Background:

Post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is one of the most fearful complications which may occur after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The methods used to predict POPF pre-operatively have not been studied in great detail. We analyzed correlation between various parameters related to PD including pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal intensity (SI), pathology of pancreatic fibrosis and occurrence rates of POPF, and verified that MRI SI results could be the determining values for pre-operative prediction of POPF.

Methods:

From January 2005 to August 2006, we retrospectively examined 43 cases of PDs by reviewing abdominal MRI findings, degree of fibrosis of remnant pancreatic stump, and other surgery-related parameters.

Results:

POPF encountered in PD were 11 cases (25.6%). Operation time and degree of fibrosis of remnant pancreatic cut surface were related to POPF (P= 0.030, P= 0.010). The pancreas–liver SI ratio (PLSI) between fistula group and no fistula group was −0.0009 ± 0.2 and −0.1297 ± 0.2, respectively (P= 0.0004). The pancreas–spleen SI ratio (PSSI) in each group was 0.423 ± 0.25 and 0.288 ± 0.32, respectively (P= 0.014). Using quantitative analysis, the SI ratios were 1.27 and 0.66 in each group (P= 0.013).

Conclusions:

When analyzing the results of POPF in 43 patients who underwent PD, PLSI, PSSI and qualitative analysis, fistula group differed significantly from no fistula group. Using these results, it will be helpful for us to predict the occurrence of POPF pre-operatively using MRI in PD patients.     

The impact of intra- and postoperative fluid balance in pancreatic surgery - A retrospective cohort study

Background/objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of perioperative fluid administration in pancreatic surgery.MethodsPatients who underwent pancreatic resections were identified from our institution's prospectively maintained database. Fluid balances were recorded intraoperatively and at 24hr postoperatively. Patients were stratified into tertiles of fluid administration (low, medium, high). Adjusted multivariable analysis was performed and outcome measures were postoperative complications.ResultsA total of 211 patients were included from 2012 to 2017. Complication rates were POPF(B/C) 19.4%, DGE(B/C) 14.7%, PPH(C) 10.0% and CDC ≥ IIIb 26.1%. In multivariable analysis, high perioperative fluid balance was an independent risk factor associated with POPF (OR = 10.5, 95%CI 2.7–40.7, p = .001), CDC (OR = 2.5, 95%CI 1.2–5.3, p < .002), DGE (OR = 2.3, 95%CI 1.0–5.2, p = .017), PPH (OR = 6.7 95%CI 2.2–20.0, p = .038) and reoperation (OR = 3.1, 95%CI 1.6–6.2, p = .006). In multivariable analysis with intraoperative and postoperative fluid balances as separate predictors, intraoperative (OR = 2,5, 95%CI 1.2–5.5, p = .04) and postoperative fluid balance (OR = 2.5, 95%CI 1.2–5.5, p = .02) were predictors of POPF. Postoperative fluid balance was the only predictor for mortality (OR = 4.5, 95%CI 1.0–18.9, p = .041) and predictor for CDC (OR = 2.0, 95%CI 1.0–4.0, p = .043) and OHS days (OR = 6.9, 95%CI 0.03–13.7, p = .038).ConclusionsHigh postoperative fluid balance in particular is associated with postoperative morbidity. Maintaining a fluid-restrictive strategy postoperatively should be recommended for patients undergoing pancreatic surgery.     

Drainage fluid and serum amylase levels accurately predict development of postoperative pancreatic fistula

AIM To investigate potential biomarkers for predicting postoperative pancreatic fistula( POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD).METHODS We prospectively recruited 83 patients to this study. All patients underwent PD(Child's procedure) at the Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery at the First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University between June 2011 and April 2015. Data pertaining to demographic variables, clinical characteristics, texture of pancreas, surgical approach, histopathological results, white blood cell count, amylase and choline levels in the serum, pancreatic/gastric drainage fluid, and choline and amylase levels in abdominal drainage fluid were included in the analysis. Potential correlations between these parameters and postoperative complications such as, POPF, acute pancreatitis, hemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying, and biliary fistula, were assessed. RESULTS Twenty-eight out of the 83(33.7%) patients developed POPF. The severity of POPF was classified as Grade A in 8(28%) patients, grade B in 16(58%), and grade C in4(14%), according to the pancreatic fistula criteria. On univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, higher amylase level in the abdominal drainage fluid on postoperative day(POD)1 and higher serum amylase levels on POD4 showed a significant correlation with POPF(P 0.05). On receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, amylase cut-off level of 2365.5 U/L in the abdominal drainage fluid was associated with a 78.6% sensitivity and 80% specificity [area under the curve(AUC): 0.844; P = 0.009]. A cut-off serum amylase level of 44.2 U/L was associated with a 78.6% sensitivity and 70.9% specificity(AUC: 0.784; P = 0.05).CONCLUSION Amylase level in the abdominal drainage fluid on POD1 and serum amylase level on POD4 represent novel biomarkers associated with POPF development.     

Lower phosphate levels following pancreatectomy is associated with postoperative pancreatic fistula formation

BackgroundWhereas hypophosphatemia following hepatectomy is associated with decreased morbidity, hypophosphatemia following pancreatectomy may be associated with increased morbidity, including the development of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between postoperative hypophosphatemia and POPF formation.MethodsPatients from our institutional Research Patient Data Registry who underwent pancreatectomy from 2001 to 2017 were included. POPF was defined according to the International Study Group for Pancreatic Fistulas (ISGPF) criteria and according to internal criteria for drain removal. Postoperative serum phosphate levels, demographics, and comorbidities were evaluated. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were performed.Results2342 patients underwent pancreatic resection. Mean age was 63.0 years (SD 14.3), 51.2% were male, and 58.7% had pancreatic cancer. Of all resections, 67.7% were pancreaticoduodenectomies. In unadjusted analysis, phosphate levels were significantly and persistently lower on POD 0 and POD 2–5 in patients who developed POPF's. In adjusted analysis, POD 2 phosphate <1.75 predicted an additional 46% increased odds of POPF (OR 1.46 95% CI 1.06–2.01; p = 0.02). Distal pancreatectomy was independently associated with POPF formation when compared to pancreaticoduodenectomy (OR 1.72 95% CI 1.18–2.51; p = 0.005).ConclusionLower phosphate levels in the early post-operative period following both proximal and distal pancreatectomies is associated with increased risk of POPF.     

Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the significance of the ratio of the main pancreatic duct to the pancreas body as a predictor of leakage

Objective

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a severe and frequent complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The aim of this study was to identify an independent predictor of POPF and to assess the efficacy of preoperative multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) images as an indicator for POPF.

Methods

A total of 122 patients who underwent PD with an end-to-side, duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy between January 2005 and May 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. The diameter of the main pancreatic duct (MPD), the diameter of the short axis of the pancreas body, and the ratio of the MPD to the pancreas body (MPD index) were digitally measured based on the curved reformatted images of preoperative MDCT.

Results

Postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred in 33 patients (27%). The operative mortality rate was 3.3% (4 patients). All four patients had grade C POPF. Three died because of hemorrhage from a pseudoaneurysm of the gastroduodenal artery stump, and one died because of sepsis due to major leakage from the pancreaticojejunostomy. In a multivariate analysis, the intraoperative blood loss (/100 ml) [odds ratio (OR), 1.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05–1.17] and MPD index (<0.2) (OR 50; 95% CI 6–41) proved to be independent predictors of POPF. In patients with an MPD index of <0.2, the incidence of POPF was 45%, and the mortality rate was 7.5%.

Conclusion

The MPD index obtained from preoperative MDCT can be a reliable predictor of POPF after PD.     

Three-dimensional remnant pancreatic volume ratio indicates postoperative pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in pancreatic cancer patients after distal pancreatectomy

BackgroundPancreatectomy may cause serious pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI), which can lead to some nutritional problems, including new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM) or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Recent studies have reported that remnant pancreatic volume (RPV) significantly influences postoperative PEI. However, the specific correlation between RPV and postoperative PEI remains unclear. Here, we compare various pre-, peri-, and postoperative risk factors in a retrospective cohort to address whether preoperatively measured RPV is a predictor of postoperative PEI in pancreatic cancer patients after distal pancreatectomy (DP).MethodsSixty-one pancreatic cancer patients who underwent DP were retrospectively enrolled. Pancreatic volume was measured using preoperative 3D images, which simulated the actual intraoperative pancreatic parenchymal volume. We obtained the 3D-measured RPV and resected pancreatic volume. We calculated the ratio of the RPV to the total pancreatic volume and then divided the cohort into high- and low-RPV ratio groups based on a cut-off value (>0.35, n = 37 and ≤ 0.35, n = 24). Using multivariate analysis, the RPV ratio as well as pre-, peri- and postoperative PEI risk factors were independently assessed.ResultsThe multivariate analysis revealed that a low RPV ratio (odds ratio [OR], 5.911; p = 0.001), a hard pancreatic texture (OR, 3.313; p = 0.023) and TNM stage III/IV (OR, 3.515; p = 0.031) were strong predictors of the incidence of PEI.ConclusionsThe present study indicates that the RPV ratio is an additional useful predictor of postoperative nutrition status in pancreatic cancer patients.