Hospital variation and outcomes of simultaneous resection of primary colorectal tumour and liver metastases: a population-based study

BackgroundThe optimal treatment sequence for patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess factors associated with the use of simultaneous resections and impact on hospital variation.MethodThis population-based study included all patients who underwent liver surgery for synchronous colorectal liver metastases between 2014 and 2019 in the Netherlands. Factors associated with simultaneous resection were identified. Short-term surgical outcomes of simultaneous resections and factors associated with 30-day major morbidity were evaluated.ResultsOf 2146 patients included, 589 (27%) underwent simultaneous resection in 28 hospitals. Simultaneous resection was associated with age, sex, BMI, number, size and bilobar distribution of CRLM, and administration of preoperative chemotherapy. More minimally invasive and minor resections were performed in the simultaneous group. Hospital variation was present (range 2.4%–83.3%) with several hospitals performing simultaneous procedures more and less frequently than expected. Simultaneous resection resulted in 13% 30-day major morbidity, and 1% mortality. ASA classification ≥3 was independently associated with higher 30-day major morbidity after simultaneous resection (aOR 1.97, CI 1.10–3.42, p = 0.018).ConclusionDistinctive patient and tumour characteristics influence the choice for simultaneous resection. Remarkable hospital variation is present in the Netherlands.     

Repeat hepatectomy for recurrent colorectal liver metastases: A comparative analysis of short- and long-term results

Background: Liver recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases(CRLM) is frequent. Repeat hepatectomy has been shown to have satisfactory perioperative results. However, the long-term outcomes and the benefts for patients with early recurrence have not been clarifed. The aim of this study was to compare the short-and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing single hepatectomy and repeat hepatectomy for CRLM. Additionally, the oncological outcomes of patients with early( ≤ 6 months) ...     

Absence of association between CT-assessed skeletal muscle mass and long-term oncological outcomes after curative therapy for colorectal liver metastasis

BackgroundSarcopenia is associated with impaired short- and long-term outcomes in gastrointestinal cancers. Whether sarcopenia is associated with impaired survival after local therapy of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases (CRLM) remains controversial. This study aimed to determine the influence of sarcopenia on long-term outcomes after curative-intent therapy for CRLM.MethodsPatients undergoing local therapy for CRLM between 2003 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed using the skeletal muscle index at the level of the third lumbar vertebra as an indicator of sarcopenia. Factors associated with overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival were analyzed using univariable and multivariable cox regression.ResultsIn total 213/465 patients (46%) were considered sarcopenic. Sarcopenic patients had no impaired 5-year OS or DFS compared to non-sarcopenic patients, 38% vs 44% (p = 0.153) and 19 vs 23% (p = 0.339) respectively. Sarcopenia was not associated with impaired OS (HR = 1.11, 95%CI = 0.85–1.46, p = 0.43) or DFS (HR = 0.99, 95%CI = 0.77–1.28, p = 0.96) in multivariable analysis. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications (p = 0.47), the incidence (p = 0.65) and treatment (p = 0.37) of recurrent metastases. Five-year OS after resection for recurrences was 14% (sarcopenic) and 22% (non-sarcopenic) p 0.716.ConclusionSarcopenia assessed by computed tomography was not associated with impaired survival outcomes in the group of CRLM patients overall.     

Repeated hepatectomy after ALPPS for recurrence of colorectal liver metastasis: the edge of limits?

BackgroundRepeated liver resections for the recurrence of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) are described as safe and have similar oncological outcomes compared to first hepatectomy. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is performed in patients with conventionally non-resectable CRLM. Repeated resections after ALPPS has not yet been described.MethodsPatients that underwent repeated liver resection in recurrence of CRLM after ALPPS were included in this study. The primary endpoint was morbidity and secondary endpoints were mortality, resection margin and survival.ResultsThirty patients were included in this study. During ALPPS, most of the patients had classical split (60%, n = 18) and clearance of the FLR (77%, n = 23). Hepatic recurrence was treated with non-anatomical resection (57%, n = 17), resection combined with local ablation (13%, n = 4), open ablation (13%, n = 4), segmentectomy (10%, n = 3) or subtotal segmentectomy (7%, n = 2). Six patients (20%) developed complications (10% minor complications). No post-hepatectomy liver failure or perioperative mortality was observed. One-year patient survival was 87%. Five patients received a third hepatectomy.ConclusionRepeated resections after ALPPS for CRLM in selected patients are safe and feasible with low morbidity and no mortality. Survival seems to be comparable with repeated resections after conventional hepatectomy.     

Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic and open resection of benign liver tumours in the Netherlands: a nationwide analysis

BackgroundData on surgical outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) versus open liver resection (OLR) of benign liver tumour (BLT) are scarce. This study aimed to provide a nationwide overview of postoperative outcomes after LLR and OLR of BLT.MethodsThis was a nationwide retrospective study including all patients who underwent liver resection for hepatocellular adenoma, haemangioma and focal nodular hyperplasia in the Netherlands from 2014 to 2019. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to compare 30-day overall and major morbidity and 30-day mortality after OLR and LLR.ResultsIn total, 415 patients underwent BLT resection of whom 230 (55.4%) underwent LLR. PSM for OLR and LLR resulted in 250 matched patients. Median (IQR) length of stay was shorter after LLR than OLR (4 versus 6 days, 5.0–8.0, p < 0.001). Postoperative 30-day overall morbidity was lower after LLR than OLR (12.0% vs. 22.4%, p = 0.043). LLR was associated with reduced 30-day overall morbidity in multivariable analysis (aOR:0.46, CI:0.22–0.95, p = 0.043). Both 30-day major morbidity and 30-day mortality were not different.ConclusionsLLR for BLT is associated with shorter hospital stay and reduced overall morbidity and is preferred if technically feasible.     

Simultaneous or staged resection of synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases: a 13-year institutional follow-up

BackgroundThis study compared postoperative outcomes and survival rates of patients who underwent simultaneous or staged resection for synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases.MethodsBetween 2005 and 2018, 126 patients were registered prospectively at a university hospital in Sweden, 63 patients who underwent simultaneous resection were matched against 63 patients who underwent staged resection.ResultsThe length of hospital stay was shorter for the simultaneous resection group, at 11 vs 16 days, p = <0.001. Fewer patients experienced recurrence in the simultaneous resection group 39 vs 50 patients, p = 0.012. There were no significant differences in disease-free survival and overall survival between the groups. Age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.72; 95% CI 1.01–2.94; p = 0.049) and Clavien-Dindo score (HR 2.22; 95% CI 1.06–4.67; p = 0.035) had impact on survival.ConclusionColorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases can be resected simultaneously, and enables a shorter treatment time without jeopardizing oncological outcomes.     

Chemotherapy and repeat resection abrogate the prognostic value of neutrophil lymphocyte ratio in colorectal liver metastases

BackgroundEvolution in surgical and oncological management of CRLM has called into question the utility of clinical risk scores. We sought to establish if neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has a prognostic role in this patient cohort.MethodsFrom 2005 to 2015,379 hepatectomies were performed for CRLM, 322 underwent index hepatectomy, 57 s hepatectomies were performed. Clinicopathological data were obtained from a prospectively maintained database. Variables associated with longterm survival following index and second hepatectomy were identified by Cox regression analyses and reviewed along with 30-day post-operative morbidity and mortality.ResultsFollowing index hepatectomy 1-,3-and 5-year survival was 90.7%, 68.1% and 48.6%. Major resection, positive margins and >5 tumours were negatively associated with survival. Those with elevated NLR(>5) had a median survival of 55 months, compared to 70 months with lower NLR(p = 0.027). Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, no association between NLR and survival was demonstrated (p = 0.93). Furthermore, NLR >5 had no impact on prognosis following repeat hepatectomy. Tumour diameter >5 cm (p = 0.04) was the sole predictor of poorer survival (p = 0.049).ConclusionDespite elevated NLR correlating with shorter survival following index hepatectomy, this effect is negated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and second hepatectomy for recurrent disease. This data would not support the use of NLR in the preoperative decision algorithm for patients with CRLM.     

Short- and long-term outcomes of hepatectomy combined with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation for patients with multiple primarily unresectable colorectal liver metastases: a propensity matching analysis

BackgroundHepatectomy combined with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation (IORFA) is a strategy to eliminate all tumors in patients with multiple colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This study aimed to evaluate the surgical and oncological outcomes of hepatectomy + IORFA for multiple unresectable CRLM.MethodsWe included patients who underwent combined hepatectomy and IORFA for multiple unresectable CRLM (n = 67) or hepatectomy alone (n = 268) for CRLM. Patients were matched in a 1:1 propensity score analysis to compare the short- and long-term outcomes between groups.ResultsPatients in hepatectomy + IORFA group had a median number of 10 liver lesions. Postoperative morbidity and the rate of major complications was similar between groups (P = 0.362, P = 1.000). The median overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and hepatic recurrence free survival (HRFS) was similar between groups (3-year OS: 54.2% versus 60.9%, P = 0.389; 3-year PFS: 7.9% versus 19.6%, P = 0.148; 3-year HRFS: 16.7% versus 31.5%, P = 0.202). Re-hepatectomy or radiofrequency ablation was used to treat 47.5% of hepatic recurrences, and the median OS was significantly higher than for patients treated with systemic treatment alone (P < 0.001).ConclusionsCombining hepatectomy and IORFA could provide comparable survival rates for patients with multiple unresectable CRLM compared to those with resectable CRLM treated with hepatectomy alone.     

Local tumour control after radiofrequency or microwave ablation for colorectal liver metastases in relation to histopathological growth patterns

BackgroundRegrowth after ablation is common, but predictive factors for local control are scarce. This study investigates whether histopathological growth patterns (HGP) can be used as a predictive biomarker for local control after ablation of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).MethodsPatients who received simultaneous resection and ablation as first treatment for CRLM between 2000 and 2019 were considered eligible. HGPs were determined on resected CRLM according to international guidelines and were classified as desmoplastic or non-desmoplastic. As minimal inter-tumoural heterogeneity has been demonstrated, the HGP of resected and ablated CRLM were presumed to be identical. Local tumour progression (LTP) was assessed on postoperative surveillance imaging. Uni- and multivariable competing risk methods were used to compare LTP.ResultsIn total 221 patients with 443 ablated tumours were analysed. A desmoplastic HGP was found in 60 (27.1%) patients who had a total of 159 (34.7%) ablated lesions. Five-year LTP [95%CI] was significantly higher for ablated CRLM with a presumed non-desmoplastic HGP (37% [30–43] vs 24% [17–32], Gray's-test p = 0.014). On multivariable analysis, a non-desmoplastic HGP (adjusted HR [95%CI]; 1.55 [1.03–2.35]) was independently associated with higher LTP rates after ablation.ConclusionHGP is an independent predictor of local tumour progression following ablation of CRLM.     

Factors associated with failure to rescue after liver resection and impact on hospital variation: a nationwide population-based study

BackgroundFailure to rescue (FTR) is defined as postoperative complications leading to mortality. This nationwide study aimed to assess factors associated with FTR and hospital variation in FTR after liver surgery.MethodsAll patients who underwent liver resection between 2014 and 2017 in the Netherlands were included. FTR was defined as in-hospital or 30-day mortality after complications Dindo grade ≥3a. Variables associated with FTR and nationwide hospital variation were assessed using multivariable logistic regression.ResultsOf 4961 patients included, 3707 (74.4%) underwent liver resection for colorectal liver metastases, 379 (7.6%) for other metastases, 526 (10.6%) for hepatocellular carcinoma and 349 (7.0%) for biliary cancer. Thirty-day major morbidity was 11.5%. Overall mortality was 2.3%. FTR was 19.1%. Age 65–80 (aOR: 2.86, CI:1.01–12.0, p = 0.049), ASA 3+ (aOR:2.59, CI: 1.66–4.02, p < 0.001), liver cirrhosis (aOR:4.15, CI:1.81–9.22, p < 0.001), biliary cancer (aOR:3.47, CI: 1.73–6.96, p < 0.001), and major resection (aOR:6.46, CI: 3.91–10.9, p < 0.001) were associated with FTR. Postoperative liver failure (aOR: 26.9, CI: 14.6–51.2, p < 0.001), cardiac (aOR: 2.62, CI: 1.27–5.29, p = 0.008) and thromboembolic complications (aOR: 2.49, CI: 1.16–5.22, p = 0.017) were associated with FTR. After case-mix correction, no hospital variation in FTR was observed.ConclusionFTR is influenced by patient demographics, disease and procedural burden. Prevention of postoperative liver failure, cardiac and thromboembolic complications could decrease FTR.     

The impact of posthepatectomy liver failure on long-term survival after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis

BackgroundPostoperative complications affect both the short-term and long-term outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify specific prognostic factors among complications after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM).MethodsBetween 2002 and 2014, 427 patients underwent initial hepatectomy for CRLM. The clinicopathological parameters including postoperative complications were evaluated to identify the prognostic factors for the overall (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS).ResultsOne hundred and forty-nine patients (34%) developed postoperative complications, including surgical site infection (n = 49, 11.4%), bile leakage (n = 41, 9.6%), posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) (n = 26, 6.0%), and pulmonary complication (n = 20, 4.6%). The independent predictors of RFS included primary nodal metastasis, abnormal CA19-9 levels, extrahepatic metastasis, bilateral CRLMs, ≥5 CRLMs, preoperative chemotherapy, lack of adjuvant chemotherapy and PHLF. The 5-year RFS rates in patients with and without PHLF were 8% and 32%, respectively (P < 0.001). The independent prognostic factors for OS included primary nodal metastasis, abnormal CA19-9 levels, extrahepatic metastasis, positive surgical margins, preoperative chemotherapy, lack of adjuvant chemotherapy and PHLF. The 5-year OS rates in patients with and without PHLF were 31% and 63%, respectively (P = 0.004).ConclusionsAmong the complications, only PHLF was associated with decreased long-term survival after hepatectomy for CRLM as well as tumor-specific prognostic factors.     

Microwave ablation combined with lipiodol-microsphere mixed or conventional transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases: A retrospective study

PurposeTo investigate the clinical outcomes of microwave ablation (MWA) combined with lipiodol-microsphere mixed transarterial chemoembolization (mTACE) or conventional TACE (cTACE) for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study evaluated the medical records of patients with CRLM who underwent MWA combined with mTACE or cTACE from January 2018 to September 2021. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated during the follow-up. In addition, prognostic factors affecting survival were analyzed by univariate and multivariate methods.ResultsA total of 79 patients with CRLM were enrolled in the study (MWA-mTACE group, n = 38; MWA-cTACE group, n = 41). The patients who underwent MWA-mTACE had higher DCR (86.8% vs. 65.9%, P = 0.029) and better PFS (median, 8.1 vs. 5.5 months, P = 0.018) than those who underwent MWA-cTACE, but no significant difference was found in ORR (34.2% vs. 22.0%, P = 0.225) and OS (median, 15.7 vs. 13.0 months, P = 0.231). Further univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that MWA-mTACE was an independent positive factor for PFS, and abnormal carcinoembryonic antigen level was a hazard factor for OS. The postoperative laboratory tests and complications in patients who underwent MWA-mTACE were similar to those who underwent MWA-cTACE.ConclusionLipiodol-microsphere mixed TACE might be an effective and safe treatment to combine with microwave ablation for patients with colorectal liver metastases.     

Delayed return of gastrointestinal function after hepatectomy in an ERAS program: incidence and risk factors

BackgroundDelayed return of gastrointestinal function (DGIF) after hepatectomy can involve increased morbidity and prolonged hospital stay. Yet, data on incidence and risks factors are lacking.MethodsAll consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy between June 2018 and December 2020 were included. All patients were included in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program. DGIF was defined by the need for nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion after surgery. DGIF risk factors were identified.ResultsOverall, 206 patients underwent hepatectomy. DGIF occurred in 41 patients (19.9%) after a median time of 2 days (range, 1–14). Among them, 6 patients (14.6%) developed aspiration pneumonia, of which one required ICU for mechanical ventilation. DGIF developed along with an intraabdominal complication in 7 patients (biliary fistula, n = 5; anastomotic fistula, n = 1; adhesive small bowel obstruction, n = 1). DGIF was associated with significantly increased severe morbidity rate (p = 0.001), prolonged time to normal food intake (p < 0.001) and hospital stay (p < 0.001) and significantly decreased overall compliance rate (p = 0.001). Independent risk factors of DGIF were age (p < 0.001), vascular reconstruction (p = 0.007), anaesthetic induction using volatiles (p = 0.003) and epidural analgesia (p = 0.004). Using these 4 variables, a simple DGIF risk score has been developed allowing patient stratification in low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups.ConclusionDGIF after hepatectomy was frequently observed and significantly impacted postoperative outcomes. Identifying risk factors remains critical for preventing its occurrence.     

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases revisited

BackgroundRecent reports indicate improved survival in patients undergoing surgical treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) with hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) pump chemotherapy compared to surgery alone.MethodsPatients who underwent resection and/or ablation of CRLM between 1996 and 2016 were included from a single-institution prospectively maintained database. Proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of overall survival (OS) and 3:1 propensity score analysis (PSA).ResultsOf 349 patients included, 36 had HAI pumps placed (HAI group) and 313 did not (no-HAI group). There was no difference in primary tumor grade (p = 0.24), ECOG status (p = 0.44), tumor number (p = 0.1), tumor size (p = 0.56), margin status (p = 0.76) between the two groups.Median overall survival was 44.7months vs 37.1months for the HAI versus no-HAI group (p = 0.01). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated positive margin status (HR:2.47,p < 0.0001), HAI therapy (HR:0.56,p = 0.02), preoperative chemotherapy (HR:0.69,p = 0.02) and tumor diameter (HR:1.07,p = 0.005) as predictors of OS. In 3:1 PSA, 32 HAI subjects were matched with 87 non-HAI subjects balancing all covariates. Median OS was 42.4 months versus 35.6 months for the HAI versus no-HAI group (p = 0.03).ConclusionSurgical treatment of CRLM combined with HAI chemotherapy is associated with improved OS compared to surgery alone. Further study of this treatment approach is indicated.     

Enhanced recovery pathway after open pancreaticoduodenectomy reduces postoperative length of hospital stay without reducing composite length of stay

Background/PurposeThere is no data regarding the impact of enhanced recovery pathways (ERP) on composite length of stay (CLOS) after procedures with increased risk of morbidity and mortality, such as pancreaticoduodenectomy.MethodsPatients undergoing open pancreaticoduodenectomy before and after implementation of ERP were prospectively followed for 90 days after surgery and complications were severity graded using the Modified Accordion Grading System. A retrospective analysis of patient outcomes were compared before and after instituting ERP. 1:1 propensity score matching was used to compare ERP patient outcomes to those of matched pre-ERP patients. CLOS is defined as postoperative length of hospital stay (PLOS) plus readmission length of hospital stay within 90 days after surgery.Results494 patients underwent open pancreaticoduodenectomy – 359 pre-ERP and 135 ERP. In a 1:1 propensity-score-matched analysis of 110 matched pairs, ERP patients had significantly decreased superficial surgical site infections (5.5% vs 15.5% p = 0.015) and significantly increased rates of urinary retention (29.1% vs 7.3% p < 0.0001) compared to matched pre-ERP patients. However, overall complication rate and 90-day readmission rate were not significantly different between matched groups. Propensity score-matched ERP patients had significantly decreased PLOS (7 days vs 8 days p = 0.046) compared to matched pre-ERP patients, but CLOS was not significantly different (9 days vs 9.5 days p = 0.615).ConclusionERP may reduce PLOS but might not impact the total postoperative time spent in the hospital (i.e. CLOS) within 90 days after pancreaticoduodenectomy.     

Sarcopaenia,obesity, sarcopaenic obesity and outcomes following hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundObesity is a risk factor for the development of colorectal cancer. Limited evidence exists about outcomes for obese patients undergoing hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Sarcopaenia is characterised by a decline in muscle function and muscle mass. It is associated with poorer outcomes for patients on chemotherapy, but there are limited data for sarcopaenic patients undergoing hepatic resection for CRLM.MethodsPubmed, Embase, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and CINAHL databases were searched for articles which were selected in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). A random effects meta-analysis was conducted.ResultsThirteen studies were included incorporating 2936 patients. No significant difference was found between obese and non-obese patients in OS (HR 0.81, CI 0.47–1.39, p = 0.44) or DFS (HR 1.0, CI 0.99–1.01, p = 0.98). Sarcopaenia was associated with worse OS (HR 1.65, CI 1.10–2.48, p = 0.01), and increased major post operative complications (OR 1.91, CI 1.16–3.14, p = 0.01). Only one study examined outcomes for sarcopaenic obese patients.ConclusionLimited evidence exists describing the impact of obesity and sarcopenia on outcomes following hepatic resection for CRLM. Obese patients do not have worse oncological outcomes, whereas sarcopaenia is associated with poorer long-term survival.     

Histopathological growth patterns and positive margins after resection of colorectal liver metastases

BackgroundHistopathological growth patterns (HGPs) of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) may be an expression of biological tumour behaviour impacting the risk of positive resection margins. The current study aimed to investigate whether the non-desmoplastic growth pattern (non-dHGP) is associated with a higher risk of positive resection margins after resection of CRLM.MethodsAll patients treated surgically for CRLM between January 2000 and March 2015 at the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute and between January 2000 and December 2012 at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center were considered for inclusion.ResultsOf all patients (n = 1302) included for analysis, 13% (n = 170) had positive resection margins. Factors independently associated with positive resection margins were the non-dHGP (odds ratio (OR): 1.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11–2.87, p = 0.016) and a greater number of CRLM (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.08–1.23 p < 0.001). Both positive resection margins (HR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.13–1.76, p = 0.002) and non-dHGP (HR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.26–1.95, p < 0.001) were independently associated with worse overall survival.ConclusionPatients with non-dHGP are at higher risk of positive resection margins. Despite this association, both positive resection margins and non-dHGP are independent prognostic indicators of worse overall survival.     

Outcomes of liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in octogenarians

BackgroundThere is a dearth of information about operative outcomes in patients ≥80 years for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from Western institutions. We compare the result of HCC resections in patients <80 years vs. patients ≥80 years from our institution in the UK.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of all patients undergoing liver resections for HCC between 2005 and 2015. Demographics, comorbidities, morbidity, mortality and survival were compared between the two age groups.Results200 patients underwent resection for HCC in this time period. Nineteen patients were ≥80 years and 181 were <80 years. Comorbidities measured by the Charlson Comorbidity Index were significantly higher in the ≥80 group (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the extent of resection in the two groups. Morbidity and mortality between the <80 years and the ≥80 years group were not significantly different (morbidity 27% vs.16%; p = 0.29) (mortality 7% vs. 0%; p = 0.11). The one-year (83.4% vs. 88.2%; p = 0.83), five-year (56.3% vs. 55.8%; p = 0.83) and the overall survival rate rates (887 days vs. 1035 days; p = 0.66) were not significantly different between the groups.DiscussionLiver resection should not be precluded based on age alone; with good outcomes in patients ≥80 years justifying surgery.     

Perioperative blood transfusion and resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases: outcomes in routine clinical practice

BackgroundPrior work has shown associations between blood transfusion (BT) and inferior outcomes during resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM). Herein, we describe short and long-term outcomes relating to perioperative BT in routine clinical practice.MethodsAll CRLM resections in Ontario, Canada from 2002 to 2009 were identified using the Ontario Cancer Registry. Log-binomial regression and Cox regression were used to explore factors associated with receipt of BT and the association of BT with 5-year cancer specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS), respectively.ResultsThe study included 1310 patients; 31% (403/1310) had perioperative BT. Transfused patients had longer median length of stay (9 vs. 7 days, p < 0.001), higher 90-day mortality (9% vs. 1%, p < 0.001), greater 90-day readmission (28% vs. 16%, p < 0.001), and inferior 5-year CSS (41% vs. 48%, p = <0.001) and OS (38% vs. 47%, p < 0.001). Transfusion was independently associated with inferior CSS (HR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.11–1.63) and OS (HR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.10–1.53), however, excluding 90-day postoperative deaths showed these associations were no longer significant.ConclusionPerioperative BT is common in patients undergoing resection of CRLM. While transfusion is associated with greater morbidity, mortality, and inferior survival, after excluding early postoperative deaths, BT does not appear to be independently associated with CSS or OS.     

Low health literacy is associated with worse postoperative outcomes following hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer surgery

BackgroundLow health literacy (HL) can lead to worse health outcomes for patients with chronic diseases and could also lead to worse postoperative outcomes. This retrospective cohort study investigates the association between HL and postoperative textbook outcome (TO) after hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) cancer surgery.MethodsPatients that consented and underwent surgery for a premalignant andmalignant HPB tumor were included. Preoperatively, HL was measured by the brief health literacy screen (BHLS). Patients were categorized as having low or adequate HL. Primary outcome was TO (length of hospital stay (LOS) ≤ 75th percentile; and no severe complication; and no readmission and mortality within 30 days after discharge). Secondary outcomes were LOS and emergency department (ED) visits within 30 days after discharge.ResultsIn total, 137 patients were included, of whom thirty-six patients had low HL. In patients with low HL (vs. adequate HL), rate of TO was lower (55.6% vs. 72.3%; p = 0.095), LOS was significantly longer (13.5 vs. 9 days; p = 0.007) and there was only a slight difference in ED visits (14.3% vs. 11.0%; p = 0.560). Patients with low HL had a significant lower chance of achieving TO (OR 0.400, 95%-CI 0.169–0.948; p = 0.037).ConclusionLow HL leads to worse postoperative outcome after HPB cancer surgery. Better preoperative education and guidance of patients with low HL could lead to better postoperative outcomes. Therefore, HL could be the next modifiable risk factor before major surgery.