Completion of adjuvant therapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer

BackgroundAdjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). It is estimated that only 40–80% eligible patients initiate intended adjuvant chemotherapy. Completion rates are largely unknown.MethodsA retrospective analysis of outcomes of patients with resected PDAC over an 8-year period at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) was performed.ResultsFrom a total of 309 patients, 299 were included for further analysis. 242 (81%) initiated adjuvant therapy (AT) and 195 (65%) completed the intended course. The median time-to-initiation of AT was 53 days (7.6 weeks). The most common reasons for early discontinuation of AT (n = 47) were toxicity (n = 29), disease recurrence (n = 9), patient decision (n = 4), unrelated comorbidities (n = 3), and death (n = 1). Completion of AT was an independent predictor of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) on multivariable analysis (OS: HR 0.41, CI 0.27–0.61, p < 0.001; RFS: HR 0.52, CI 0.36–0.76, p < 0.001). Factors associated with early termination of AT were vascular resection (OR 0.29, CI 0.13–0.67, p = 0.004) and administration of AT with local oncologist as opposed to MCC (OR 0.41, CI 0.21–0.82, p = 0.010).ConclusionCompletion of AT is associated with improved survival in patients with resected PDAC. Factors associated with an inability to complete AT include vascular resection and administration of AT with local care team in the patient's community.     

Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected biliary tract cancers

BackgroundThis meta-analysis was performed by analyzing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the potential prognostic value of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for patients with resected biliary tract cancers (BTCs).MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles published. Only RCTs affected by tumors of gallbladder, intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal bile ducts were considered. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival (OS).ResultsThe study identified 1192 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. ACT had nearly reached a significant better OS (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.77–1.01; P = 0.07) and achieved a significant better RFS (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69–0.99; P = 0.04). The effectiveness of ACT for OS was significantly modified by fluorouracil-based ACT (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70–0.99; P = 0.04), but not by gemcitabine-based ACT (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.74–1.12; P = 0.36). The survival benefit was also not modified by primary disease site, resection margin status, and lymph node status.ConclusionsACT is correlated with favorable relapse-free survival compared with non-ACT for resected BTCs patients. Fluorouracil-based ACT could be viewed as a standard practice for resected BTCs patients regardless of the primary cancer site, lymph node or margin status.     

Evaluation of the significance of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage ⅠA pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BackgroundAlthough adjuvant chemotherapy is considered a standard treatment for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), its utility in stage ⅠA patients is unclear. We aimed to investigate the recurrence rate, surgical outcome, prognostic factors, effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy, and determination of groups in whom adjuvant chemotherapy is effective in patients with stage ⅠA PDAC.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 73 patients who underwent pancreatectomy and were pathologically diagnosed with stage ⅠA PDAC between 2000 and 2018. We evaluated the relation between clinicopathological factors, recurrence rates, and outcomes such as the recurrence-free and disease-specific survival rates (RFS and DSS, respectively).ResultsThe 5-year RFS and DSS rates were 52% and 58%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, a platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) ≥ 170, prognostic nutrition index (PNI) < 47.5, and pathological grade 2 or 3 constituted risk factors for a shorter DSS (hazard ratios: 4.7, 4.6, and 4.1, respectively). Patients with 0–1 of these risk factors (low-risk group; n = 47) had significantly higher 5-year DSS rates than those with 2–3 risk factors (high-risk group; n = 26) (80% vs. 23%; P < 0.001). Patients in the low-risk group showed similar 5-year RFS rates regardless of whether they received or not adjuvant chemotherapy (75% vs 70%, respectively; P = 0.49). Contrarily, high-risk patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy had higher 5-year RFS rates than those who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (32% vs 0%; P = 0.045).ConclusionsIn stage IA PDAC, adjuvant chemotherapy seems to be effective only in a subgroup of high-risk patients.     

Early liver metastases after “failure” of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colorectal cancer: is there a role for additional adjuvant therapy?

BackgroundThe utility of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) in patients with rapid recurrence after adjuvant chemotherapy for their primary tumor is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oncologic benefit of adjuvant hepatic arterial plus systemic chemotherapy (HAIC + Sys) in patients with early CLM.MethodsA retrospective analysis of patients with early CLM (≤12 months of adjuvant chemotherapy for primary tumor) who received either HAIC + Sys, adjuvant systemic chemotherapy alone (Sys), or active surveillance (Surgery alone) following resection of CLM was performed. Recurrence and survival were compared between treatment groups using Kaplan–Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsOf 239 patients undergoing resection of early CLM, 79 (33.1%) received HAIC + Sys, 77 (32.2%) received Sys, and 83 (34.7%) had Surgery alone. HAIC + Sys was independently associated with reduced risk of RFS events (adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj]: 0.64, 95%CI:0.44–0.94, p = 0.022) and all-cause mortality (HRadj: 0.54, 95%CI:0.36–0.81, p = 0.003) compared to Surgery alone patients. Largest tumor >5 cm (HRadj: 2.03, 95%CI: 1.41–2.93, p < 0.001) and right-sided colon tumors (HRadj: 1.93, 95%CI: 1.29–2.89, p = 0.002) were independently associated with worse OS.ConclusionAdjuvant HAIC + Sys after resection of early CLM that occur after chemotherapy for node-positive primary is associated with improved outcomes.     

Therapeutic drug monitoring of neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BackgroundDespite a potentially curative treatment, the prognosis after upfront surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is poor. Modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) is a cornerstone in the systemic treatment of PDAC, including the neoadjuvant setting. Pharmacokinetic-guided (PKG) dosing has demonstrated beneficial effects in other tumors, but scarce data is available in pancreatic cancer.MethodsForty-six patients with resected PDAC after mFOLFIRINOX neoadjuvant approach and included in an institutional protocol for anticancer drug monitoring were retrospectively analyzed. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) dosage was adjusted throughout neoadjuvant treatment according to pharmacokinetic parameters and Irinotecan (CPT-11) pharmacokinetic variables were retrospectively estimated.ResultsBy exploratory univariate analyses, a significantly longer progression-free survival was observed for patients with either 5-FU area under the curve (AUC) above 28 mcg·h/mL or CPT-11 AUC values below 10 mcg·h/mL. In the multivariate analyses adjusted by age, gender, performance status and resectability after stratification according to both pharmacokinetic parameters, the risk of progression was significantly reduced in patients with 5-FU AUC ≥28 mcg·h/mL [HR = 0.251, 95% CI 0.096–0.656; p = 0.005] and CPT-11 AUC <10 mcg·h/mL [HR = 0.189, 95% CI 0.073–0.486, p = 0.001].ConclusionsPharmacokinetically-guided dose adjustment of standard chemotherapy treatments might improve survival outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.     

Prognostic and predictive value of tumoral DNA damage repair protein expression in patients with resected pancreatic cancer

ObjectiveDNA damage repair (DDR) gene mutations gained interest in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) patients, but their relevance in adjuvant setting is not well characterized. We assessed the prognostic and predictive potential of tumoral expression of DDR proteins along with clinical and tumor characteristics in patients with resected PC.Patients and MethodsPatients with PC who underwent pancreatic resection in our institution between 2005 and 2017 were retrospectively retrieved. Tumoral expression of a panel of DDR proteins including BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, and p53 with immunohistochemistry was evaluated and association with patient and tumor features as well as prognosis was assessed.Results130 patients were included in the study. The median age was 61 and 66% were males, 57% had lymph node involvement and 17% had a vascular invasion. 25 patients (19%) had thrombosis at the time of diagnosis. Median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 21.6 and 11.8 months, respectively. More advanced disease stage (HR: 3.67 95% CI 1.48–9.12, p = 0.005), presence of thrombosis (HR: 2.01 95% CI 1.04–3.89, p = 0.039), high BRCA1 expression (HR: 2.25, 95% CI 1.13–5.48, p = 0.023) and high post-operative CA 19–9 level (>100 IU/ml) (HR:2.61 95% CI 1.40–4.89, p = 0.003) were associated with shorter DFS. BRCA2, ATM, and p53 expression were not associated with DFS or OS. Adjuvant gemcitabine-cisplatin regimen was not associated with increased DFS or OS in the whole group, neither in low or high expressors of BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM or p53.ConclusionContrary to BRCA2, ATM, and P53, BRCA1 expression may be beneficial for prognosis in resected pancreatic cancer, while no predictive role was observed in terms of adjuvant platinum efficacy.     

The impact of resection margin and microvascular invasion on long-term prognosis after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multi-institutional study

BackgroundThe resection margin (RM) status and microscopic vascular invasion (MVI) are known prognostic factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). An enhanced understanding of their impact on long-term prognosis is required to improve oncological outcomes.MethodsUsing multi-institutional data, the different impact of the RM status (narrow, <1 cm, or wide, ≥1 cm) and MVI (positive or negative) on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after curative liver resection of solitary HCC without macrovascular invasion was analyzed.ResultsIn 801 patients, 306 (38%) had a narrow RM and 352 (44%) had positive MVI. The median OS and RFS were 109.8 and 74.8 months in patients with wide RM & negative MVI, 93.5 and 53.1 months with wide RM & positive MVI, 79.2 and 41.6 months with narrow RM & negative MVI, and 69.2 and 37.5 months with narrow RM & positive MVI (both P < 0.01). On multivariable analyses, narrow RM & positive MVI had the highest hazard ratio with reduced OS and RFS (HR 2.96, 95% CI 2.11–4.17, and HR 3.15, 95% CI, 2.09–4.67, respectively).ConclusionsConcomitant having narrow RM and positive MVI increases the risks of postoperative death and recurrence by about 2-fold in patients with solitary HCC.     

Prognostic impact of tumor vascularity on CT in resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BackgroundWe investigated the vascularity of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) on computed tomography (CT) images and its association with ICC recurrence after surgery and prognosis after recurrence.MethodsIn this retrospective study, the data of patients who underwent resection with curative intent for ICC between March 2001 and July 2017 were reviewed. Clinicopathologic factors including tumor vascularity (hypovascular, rim-enhancement, and hypervascular) on CT that could affect recurrence-free survival (RFS) were assessed. The association between the vascularity of recurrent ICC and survival after recurrence was also analyzed.ResultsOverall, 147 patients were enrolled and followed up for a median of 36.1 months of which, 101 (68.7%) experienced ICC recurrence. Hypervascularity of ICC showed better RFS than other vascularities [rim-enhanced image hazard ratio (HR), 3.893; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.700–8.915, p = 0.001; hypovascular image HR, 6.241; 95% CI, 2.670–14.586, p < 0.001]. The hypervascular recurrent ICC was also significantly associated with better survival after recurrence (log-rank test, p < 0.001).ConclusionHypervascular ICC was associated with a longer RFS and better prognosis after recurrence. The vascularity of ICC on CT may be a noninvasive, accessible, and useful prognostic index, and should be considered while planning treatment.     

Primary tumour resection in metastatic nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine carcinomas

BackgroundThe role of debulking surgery in metastatic nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine carcinomas (M-NF-PECs) with resectable primary tumour and unresectable liver metastases is debated.AimAim of the study is to evaluate whether the resection of the primary tumour in metastatic nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine carcinoma improves survival.Patients and methodsFifty-one metastatic nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine carcinoma patients with unresectable liver metastases were enrolled from 1990 to 2004 at the time of diagnosis. Nineteen patients underwent complete resection of the primary tumour whilst 32 were judged unresectable. All cases were classified according to the WHO 2000 classification. All clinico-pathological parameters, including grade of differentiation and the Ki-67 proliferation index were considered in univariate and multivariate models.ResultsOf the 19 resected patients, 14 (73.7%) underwent left-pancreatectomy and 5 (26.3%) pancreaticoduodenectomy. In the unresected group of 32 patients, 9 (28.1%) underwent surgical biliary and/or gastric by-pass. There was no postoperative mortality and the median survival was 54.3 months (95% CI: 25.7–82.9). No difference in survival was observed between the two groups [resected: median 54.3 months (95% CI: 25–83.6), unresected: median 39.5 months (95% CI: 5.4–73.6); p = 0.74]. Upon multivariate analysis poor differentiation (HR 3.01; 95% CI 1.08–8.4; p = 0.035) and a Ki-67 index ≥10% (HR 4.4; 95% CI 1.2–16.1; p = 0.023) were significant predictors of survival.ConclusionsResection of the primary pancreatic tumour in metastatic nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine carcinoma patients with unresectable liver metastases does not significantly improve survival. Resection can be considered as symptomatic palliative therapy in patients with well-differentiated endocrine carcinomas and a proliferative index lower than 10%.     

The impact of hepatic arterial infusion pump chemotherapy on hepatic recurrences and survival in patients with resected colorectal liver metastases

BackgroundThe objective was to investigate the impact of adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy on the rates and patterns of recurrence and survival in patients with resected colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).MethodsRecurrence rates, patterns, and survival were compared between patients treated with and without adjuvant HAIP using competing risk analyses.Results2128 patients were included, of which 601 patients (28.2%) received adjuvant HAIP and systemic chemotherapy (HAIP + SYS). The overall recurrence rate was similar with HAIP + SYS or SYS (63.5% versus 64.2%,p = 0.74). The 5-year cumulative incidence of initial intrahepatic recurrences was lower with HAIP + SYS (22.9% versus 38.4%,p < 0.001). The 5-year cumulative incidence of initial extrahepatic recurrences was higher with HAIP + SYS (48.5% versus 40.3%,p = 0.005), because patients remained at risk for extrahepatic recurrence in the absence of intrahepatic recurrence, which was largely attributable to more pulmonary recurrences with HAIP + SYS (33.6% versus 23.7%,p < 0.001). HAIP was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (adjusted HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60–0.79, p < 0.001), and OS (adjusted HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.57–0.78,p < 0.001).ConclusionAdjuvant HAIP chemotherapy is associated with lower intrahepatic recurrence rates and better DFS and OS after resection of CRLM.     

Invasive IPMN relapse later and more often in lungs in comparison to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BackgroundThe different oncological outcomes of invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (I-IPMN) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are debated. This study aimed to compare disease recurrence patterns and histopathological characteristics in patients with resected I-IPMN and PDAC.MethodsConsecutive patients undergoing surgical resection for stage I-III I-IPMN or PDAC between 2010 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy or resected for Tis neoplasia were excluded. All surgical specimens were re-staged according to AJCC-8th-edition.ResultsA total of 330 patients were included, of whom 43 had I-IPMN and 287 had PDAC. Median follow-up time was 26.7 (1.3–92.3) months and estimated median disease-free survival (DFS) was 60.3 months (47.2–73.4) for I-IPMN and 23.8 (19.3–28.2) months for PDAC (p < 0.001). During follow-up, 32.6% of I-IPMN and 67.9% of PDAC patients experienced recurrence (p < 0.001). The sites of first recurrence were the lungs (38.5% vs 13.1%, p = 0.027), liver (28.6% vs 45.0%, p = 0.180) and local (15.4% vs 36.6%, p = 0.101) for I-IPMN and PDAC, respectively. At multivariate analysis, I-IPMN histology remained an independent predictive factor for longer DFS (OR 0.528, CI 95% 0.278–1.000, p = 0.050), regardless of stage or adjuvant chemotherapy. I-IPMN and PDAC differed in rates of neuroinvasion (51.2% vs 97.2%) and positive lymph node status (N+) (46.5% vs 82.7%), especially in patients with lower T status.ConclusionI-IPMN showed a different recurrence pattern compared to PDAC, with a higher lung tropism, and longer DFS. This different biological behavior is associated with lower rates of neuroinvasion and nodal involvement, especially in early-stage disease.     

Prognostic significance of preoperative PNI and CA19-9 for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A multi-institutional retrospective study

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the clinical value of nutritional and immunological prognostic scores as predictors of outcomes and to identify the most promising scoring system for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in a multi-institutional study.MethodsData were retrospectively collected for 589 patients who underwent surgical resection for PDAC. Prognostic analyses were performed for overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) using tumor and patient-related factors, namely neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), modified GPS, C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio, Controlling Nutritional Status score, and the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index.ResultsCompared with PDAC patients with high PNI values (≥46), low PNI (<46) patients showed significantly worse overall survival (OS) (multivariate hazard ratio (HR), 1.432; 95% CI, 1.069–1.918; p = 0.0161) and RFS (multivariate HR, 1.339; 95% CI, 1.032–1.736; p = 0.0277). High carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA19-9) values (≥450) were significantly correlated with shorter OS (multivariate HR, 1.520; 95% CI, 1.261–2.080; p = 0.0002) and RFS (multivariate HR, 1.533; 95% CI, 1.199–1.961; p = 0.0007). Stratification according to PNI and CA19-9 was also significantly associated with OS and RFS (log rank, P < 0.0001).ConclusionsOur large cohort study showed that PNI and CA19-9 were associated with poor clinical outcomes in PDAC patients following surgical resection. Additionally, combining PNI with CA19-9 enabled further classification of patients according to their clinical outcomes.     

A phase II,open-label,multicenter study to evaluate the antitumor efficacy of CO-1.01 as second-line therapy for gemcitabine-refractory patients with stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma and negative tumor hENT1 expression

BackgroundNucleotide transporters such as human equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 (hENT1) play a major role in transporting gemcitabine into cells. CO-1.01 (gemcitabine-5′-elaidate) is a novel cytotoxic agent consisting of a fatty acid derivative of gemcitabine, which is transported intracellularly independent of hENT1. CO-1.01 was postulated to have efficacy as a second-line treatment in gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic adenocarcinoma in patients with negative tumor hENT1 expression.MethodsEligibility criteria included patients with either a newly procured or archival biopsy tumor confirming the absence of hENT1 and either gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreas adenocarcinoma or with progression of disease following resection during or within 3 months of adjuvant gemcitabine therapy. Patients were treated with intravenous infusion of CO-1.01 dosed at 1250 mg/m² on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle. The primary end point was disease control rate (DCR).ResultsNineteen patients were enrolled of which 18 patients were evaluable for efficacy assessment. Thirteen patients (68%) had liver metastases, 6 (32%) had lymph node metastases, and 10 (53%) had lung metastases. Two of 18 patients (11%) achieved disease control. The median survival time was 4.3 (95% CI 2.1–8.1) months. All patients experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event with the majority of events being mild or moderate.ConclusionThis study did not meet its primary endpoint and no efficacy signal was identified for CO-1.01 in treating progressive metastatic pancreas adenocarcinoma.     

Adjuvant therapy for margin positive pancreatic cancer: A propensity score matched analysis

BackgroundAdjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation is often recommended for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We sought to examine the impact of these therapies on R1 resected pancreatic cancer.MethodsUtilizing the National Cancer Database we identified patients who underwent pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma. Patients were stratified by resection status and adjuvant therapy.ResultsWe identified 28,440 patients who underwent pancreatic resection. Patients with tumor size >2 cm were more likely to undergo R1 resections, p < 0.001. Adjuvant therapy improved survival in all patients with median and 5-year survival: adjuvant chemotherapy (21.7 months, 17.45%), chemoradiation (23.3 months, 20.9%) vs no adjuvant therapy (19.5 months, 19.1%), p < 0.001. In the R1 resection cohort survival was also improved with adjuvant therapy with chemoradiation demonstrating the most significant improvement: adjuvant chemotherapy (15.9 months, 6.5%), chemoradiation (18.7 months, 11.2%) vs no adjuvant therapy (12.5 months, 8.7%), p < 0.001. Chemoradiation but not adjuvant chemotherapy improved survival in the R1 node negative, p < 0.004, and node positive, p < 0.001. Adjuvant chemotherapy benefited survival in R1 node positive patients, p < 0.001.ConclusionsPatients with pancreatic cancer who undergo R1 resection have significant improvement in survival when treated with adjuvant chemoradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy. However, benefits were greater in those receiving adjuvant chemoradiation.     

Synchronous resection of colorectal cancer primary and liver metastases: an outcomes analysis

BackgroundConcurrent resection of the primary cancer and synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) was evaluated for differences in outcomes following stratification of both the liver and colorectal resection.MethodsConsecutive cases of synchronous resection of both the CRC primary and CRCLM were reviewed retrospectively at a single, high-volume institution over a 17-year period (2000–2017).Results273 patients underwent simultaneous resection of CRCLM. The distribution of the primary lesion was similar between the colon (52.4%) and rectum (47.6%), while 46.9% of patients had bilobar liver disease. Major liver/major colorectal resection (n = 24) were significantly more likely to experience colorectal specific morbidity (OR 3.98, 95% CI 1.56–10.15, p = 0.004), liver specific morbidity (OR 7.4, 95% CI 2.22–24.71, p = 0.001), total morbidity (OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.18–7.18, p = 0.020) and 90-day mortality (OR 5.50, 95% CI 1.27–23.81, p = 0.023). Failure to receive adjuvant chemotherapy secondary to postoperative morbidity was associated with significantly worsened survival (HR for death 5.91, 95% CI 1.59–22.01, p = 0.008).ConclusionsPostoperative morbidity precluding the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with an increase in mortality. Combining a major liver with major colorectal resection is associated with a significant increase in major morbidity and 90-day mortality, and should be avoided.     

Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial of biliary drainage in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Background and aimsThe DRAINAGE trial was a randomized controlled trial comparing preoperative endoscopic (EBD) and percutaneous biliary drainage (PTBD) in patients with potentially resectable, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes.MethodsPatients were randomized in four tertiary referral centers. Follow-up data were available for all included patients. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were readmissions, and re-interventions not including in-trial interventions.ResultsA total of 54 patients were randomized; 27 in both groups. Median follow-up for both groups was 62 months (95% CI 54–70). The median OS was 13 months (95% CI 7.9–18.1) in the EBD and 7 months (95% CI 0.0–17.2) in the PTBD group (P = 0.28). Twenty (37%, n = 8 EBD vs n = 12 PTBD, P = 0.43) of 54 patients were readmitted at least once, mostly due to drainage-related complications (n = 13, 24%). Of note, 14 out of the 54 patients died within the trial. A total of 76 drainage procedures (32 EBD and 44 PTBD) were performed in 28 patients. The median number of stent or drain placements was 2 (2–4) for the EBD group and 2 (1–3) for the PTBD group (P = 0.77).DiscussionAlthough this follow-up study represented a small cohort, no long-term differences in survival, readmissions, and drainage procedures for EBD and PTBD were found, even when comparing the resected and unresected group. However, this study demonstrates the complexity of biliary drainage for patients with potentially resectable pCCA, even in tertiary referral centers.     

Impact of Controlling nutritional status (CONUT) in patients with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer receiving multi-agent chemotherapy: A single center,retrospective cohort study

Controlling nutritional status (CONUT) calculated using the serum albumin concentration, total lymphocyte count, and total cholesterol, was developed as a screening tool for the early detection of undernutrition. In addition, CONUT has been reported to be a prognostic predictor of various malignancies.AimTo investigate the impact of CONUT in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC).MethodsBetween June 2014 and October 2020, 110 consecutive patients with APC who received multi-agent chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified into four categories (normal, 1; light, 2; moderate, 3; severe, 4) based on CONUT. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.ResultsThirty-nine (35.4%), 63 (57.2%), and 8 (7.2%) patients had CONUT 1, 2, and 3, respectively, but no patients for CONUT 4. The baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between CONUT classifications. In the multivariate analyses, the presence of metastasis (hazard ratio [HR], 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22–3.52), CONUT 2 (HR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.32–3.54), and CONUT 3 (HR, 9.18; 95% CI, 2.67–23.50) were independent risk factors for PFS. The presence of metastasis (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.04–3.07), CONUT 2 (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.16–3.24), and CONUT 3 (HR, 10.71; 95% CI, 3.87–27.63) were also independent risk factors for OS. A median OS in CONUT 1, 2, and 3 were 20, 14.5, and 3.5 months (CONUT 1 vs. CONUT 2, p = 0.02; CONUT 1 vs. CONUT 3, p < 0.01; CONUT 2 vs. CONUT 3, p < 0.01), respectively.ConclusionCONUT could be a predictor of prognosis for survival in patients with APC.     

Time course and risk factors of evolution from potential to overt autoimmune gastritis

BackgroundThe natural history of patients with potential autoimmune gastritis (AIG), defined by the presence of serum anti-parietal cell antibody (PCA) positivity and no gastric histopathological alterations, is unknown. We therefore aimed to assess the natural history and clinical correlates of potential autoimmune gastritis (AIG).MethodsIn 2000–2019, we enrolled potential AIG patients by monitoring once a year (±6 months) histopathological evolution into overt AIG, defined as the occurrence of atrophy in the oxyntic mucosa. Factors affecting disease progression were assessed.ResultsFifty-one potential AIG patients (median age 57 years, IQR 43–73, F:M ratio 1.7:1) were monitored for up to 15 years (median 6 years, IQR 3–8). Of them, 24 (47.1%) evolved into overt AIG in a median time of 2 years (IQR 2–4.5). Having a concomitant autoimmune disorder (HR 4.09, 95% CI 1.52–11.00; p = 0.005), but not older age (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.45–2.22; p = 0.992) and female sex (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.51–2.78; p = 0.395), was associated with evolution into overt AIG.ConclusionsRoughly one in two potential AIG patients will evolve into overt AIG over a median time of two years, especially those with a concurrent autoimmune disorder.     

Deficient mismatch repair phenotype is a prognostic factor for colorectal cancer in elderly patients

ObjectiveAbout 15% of colorectal adenocarcinomas have a deficient DNA mismatch repair phenotype. The frequency of deficient DNA mismatch repair tumours increases with age due to the hypermethylation of hMLH1 promoter. The study aimed to determine the prognostic value of deficient DNA mismatch repair phenotype in elderly patients.DesignMismatch repair phenotype was retrospectively determined by molecular analysis in consecutive resected colorectal adenocarcinoma specimens from patients over 75 years of age from 4 Oncology centres.Results231 patients (median age: 81, range: 75–100) were enrolled from 2005 to 2008. Mean prevalence of deficient DNA mismatch repair phenotype was 22.5%, and 36% for patients over 85 years. Deficient DNA mismatch repair status was significantly associated with older age, female sex, proximal colon primary and high grade tumour. For stage II tumours no deficient DNA mismatch repair tumours had a recurrence at end of follow-up compared to 17% for tumours with proficient phenotype. The proficient phenotype status was significantly associated with worse age-adjusted overall survival [HR 2.60; 95% CI 1.05–6.44; p = 0.039]. For stage III tumours a trend for less recurrence was observed for deficient DNA mismatch repair phenotype (16%) compared to proficient phenotype (36%).Conclusiondeficient DNA mismatch repair phenotype is a prognostic factor in stage II colorectal tumour in elderly patients. Our results suggest that mismatch repair phenotype should be taken in consideration for adjuvant chemotherapy decision in elderly patients.