The German emergency and disaster medicine and management systemdhistory and present

As well for optimized emergency management in individual cases as for optimized mass medicine in disaster management, the principle of the medical doctors approaching the patient directly and timely, even close to the site of the incident, is a long-standing marker for quality of care and patient survival in Germany. Professional rescue and emergency forces, including medical services, are the “Golden Standard” of emergency management systems. Regulative laws, proper organization of resources, equipment, training and adequate delivery of medical measures are key factors in systematic approaches to manage emergencies and disasters alike and thus save lives. During disasters command, communication, coordination and cooperation are essential to cope with extreme situations, even more so in a globalized world. In this article, we describe the major historical milestones, the current state of the German system in emergency and disaster management and its integration into the broader European approach.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Quality of care and benchmarking

BACKGROUND: Quality control is an important issue in surgery. Therefore, we assessed the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC) performed at our institution specialized in laparoscopic surgery in order to do a benchmarking. METHODS: The perioperative courses of the first 1000 LCs performed in Aarberg hospital were recorded, analyzed, and compared with the results of a recent study including 10, 174 patients published by the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery (SALTS). RESULTS: The following quality indicators were compared with the corresponding SALTS rates: primary conversion rate 1.5% (SALTS 8.2%; p <0.01); conversion rate for intraoperative complications 6.5% (63.8%; p <0.01); intraoperative complication rate 22.2% (34.4%; p <0.01); postoperative morbidity rate 8.1% (10.4%; n.s.); in-hospital mortality rate 0.1% (0.2%; n.s.); and reoperation rate 0.8% (1.7%; n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: LC has reached a high quality level in its widespread use, but in a small specialized center even a higher quality level can be achieved. Favorable results seem to depend on structural advantages of a surveyable unit in association with a continuously motivated surgical team.     

Computed tomography rates in pediatric trauma patients among emergency medicine and pediatric emergency medicine physicians

BackgroundPediatric trauma patients undergo fewer computed tomography (CT) scans when evaluated at pediatric trauma centers (PTC) versus adult trauma centers (ATC) with no change in clinical outcome. Factors contributing to this difference are unclear. We sought to identify whether the training background of physicians, specifically emergency medicine (EM) versus pediatric emergency medicine (PEM), affected the CT rate of pediatric trauma patients within one institution.MethodsA single-center retrospective study of CT utilization based on attending physicians’ training in trauma patients <18 years between November 2018 and November 2020. Attendings were categorized into two groups: EM residency with no PEM fellowship, or pediatrics/EM residency with PEM fellowship. Primary outcomes measured were the proportion of patients receiving a CT and CT positivity rate.ResultsOf 463 study patients, CTs were obtained in 145/228 (64%) patients by EM, and 130/235 (55%) by PEM (p=.07). CT positivity rate was 21% and 19% in EM and PEM, respectively (p=.46). The mean number of CTs per patient in EM was 2.8 compared to 2.1 in PEM (p<.01), and for patients with an injury severity score (ISS) >15, mean number of CTs per patient increased to 4.9 in EM versus 2.4 in PEM (p=.01).ConclusionsThe mean number of CTs ordered per patient was statistically higher for EM attendings. The differences between CT rates highlight future opportunities for ongoing development of pediatric trauma imaging guidelines and radiation exposure reduction.Levels of evidenceRetrospective Study, Level III     

Role of the emergency medicine physician in airway management of the trauma patient.

BACKGROUND: A Level I trauma center recently underwent a policy change wherein airway management of the trauma patient is under the auspices of Emergency Medicine (EM) rather than Anesthesiology. METHODS: We prospectively collected data on 11 months of EM intubations (EMI) since this policy change and compared them to the last year of Anesthesia-managed intubations (ANI) to answer the following questions: (1) Is intubation of trauma patients being accomplished effectively by EM? (2) Has there been a change in complication rates since the policy change? (3) How does the complication rate at our trauma center compare with other institutions? RESULTS: EM residents successfully intubated trauma patients on their first attempt 73.7% of the time compared with 77.2% ANI. The overall success rates, i.e., securing the airway within three attempts, were 97.0% (EMI) and 98.0% (ANI). The airway was successfully secured by EMI 100% of the time while a surgical airway was performed in two ANIs. CONCLUSION: EM residents and staff can safely manage the airway of trauma patients. There is no statistically significant difference in peri-intubation complications. The complication rate for EDI (33%) and ANI (38%) is higher than reported in the literature, although the populations are not entirely comparable.     

Equipment and algorithms in emergency medicine and resuscitation

Management of the airway during cardiopulmonary arrest and major trauma demands decisive and swift thinking. In the former, it is non-physicians who are largely responsible for the early, effective delivery of oxygen to vital organs. Such situations should involve the use of simple airway adjuncts that allow optimum ventilation with the minimum of side-effects. Training should not require the retention of complex motor skills that are often forgotten and infrequently practised. This contrasts with the highly complex approach to managing the airway in victims of trauma. In these circumstances senior anaesthetists should be involved. Adherence to strict guidelines regarding control of the cervical spine, cricoid pressure and the early recognition of potential problems afford these patients the best chance of survival. The effective use of surgical airway techniques is to be encouraged in this group of individuals.     

History of emergency medicine in Germany

The beginnings of organized emergency care can be traced through military history dating back to the Middle Ages. In 1769, the first civilian rescue society was established to look after shipwrecked persons. Sociological and technical requirements of the late 19th century led to the formation of different rescue associations and to writing of regulations for rescue and ambulance services. The development of quality assurance was interrupted by World War I. Around 1930, the rescue service was mostly the responsibility of the Red Cross and fire brigades but included the first actions of emergency physicians. Today the rescue service functions to bring a physician, often an anesthesiologist, to the victim as quickly as possible. Modern rescue laws fix a lead time of 5 to 15 minutes for a professional rescue service to reach the scene. The medical equipment and qualifications of personnel treating life-threatening trauma and diseases have improved, and in this context, the role of the anesthesiologist is important.     

Telemedical support in emergency medicine]

In July 1997 we began support of paramedics who would respond to emergency scenes using a telecommunications system based in the hospital emergency unit. However, since no telecommunications system that could be employed on the actual clinical site was available, we had to develop a new system. Our telecommunications system (TMS-6101, NIHON KOHDEN WELLNES Co., Tokyo, Japan) can transmit vital signs in real time and interactively transmit several types of moving images. Because the current infrastructure for radio communications cannot provide adequate telemedical support for paramedics, we are using the new system for clinical support between our unit and associated hospitals. Based on 57 cases of clinical telemedical intervention, the system has enabled high-quality decision making by specialists without the need for them to travel to the scene or transport X-rays films, ultrasonographic reports, or endoscopic results. If this newly developed telecommunications system is employed for telemedical interventions in medical facilities in remote areas or on remote islands, medical consultations for Japanese individuals overseas, night-time first aid in urban areas, and in disaster situations, the physicians on both side of the line will be able to obtain a wealth of timely information, greatly influencing outcome in both emergency and nonemergency cases.     

Non-invasive ventilation in prehospital emergency medicine

Non-invasive ventilation has not yet been established in prehospital emergency medicine. This most likely due to missing technical prerequisites. Meanwhile emergency ventilators feasible for prehospital NIV are available. Recognizing the pathophysiology of acute respiratory insufficiency, treatment with NIV is superior in comparison to treatment with oxygen and medication only. The advantages of NIV may lead to reduced morbidity and mortality as long as attention is paid to possible contraindications.     

Presence and future of emergency medicine in Germany

Health care policy has changed duties and responsibilities of hospitals in Germany. The transition zone of in- and outpatient care has been recognized as a critical gateway for the success of hospitals, subsequently leading to the appreciation of the value of professionalized emergency departments. Currently, hospital-based emergency medicine in Germany is organized in a very heterogeneous manner. Due to the key function of emergency departments for the medical and economic success of hospitals, professional expertise in clinical emergency medicine has to be strengthened: We discuss possible models of hospital-based emergency care and present first data that professionalisation of hospital-based emergency medicine in Germany improves treatment quality and outcome of patients presenting with chest-pain or community-acquired pneumonia to the emergency department. Furthermore, those strategies are accompanied with the improvement of economic characteristics. Summing up, professionalisation of hospital-based emergency medicine in Germany is urgently needed and may improve medical and economic success of hospital-based patient care.     

The anesthesiologist in prehospital and hospital emergency medicine

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The German emergency medical system is different from the Anglo-American system. Emergency medicine is no distinct specialty in Germany. Physicians are involved in prehospital emergency medicine. This review highlights the historic development of prehospital and hospital emergency medicine in Germany and describes future trends. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies have shown that involvement of specially trained prehospital emergency physicians can result in reduced patient mortality. The in-hospital emergency medicine structure is important for the 'chain of survival' for patients with life-threatening medical conditions. In-hospital emergency medicine has been reorganized in many hospitals during the last few years. New qualification criteria for physicians in emergency departments, therefore, need to be developed. SUMMARY: Economic and quality arguments have initiated the development of departments for emergency medicine in Germany. In the future, this will lead to new qualification criteria for physicians working in these departments.