Effects of postoperative continuous epidural analgesia after laparoscopy-assisted colectomy

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of continuous epidural analgesia on the postoperative pain and the early recovery after laparoscopy-assisted colectomy (LAC). METHODS: A total of 50 patients undergoing elective LAC were investigated for postoperative pain score and other variables retrospectively. RESULTS: Thirty patients who had received epidural analgesia (E group) showed significantly lower pain scores for 2 and 24 hours after surgery, compared with twenty patients who had received analgesics intramuscularly or transrectally (C group). The patients in the E group needed significantly less supplemental analgesics than those in C group for 12 to 24 hours after the operation. The incidence of postoperative complications and the early recovery were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that postoperative continuous epidural analgesia is effective for postoperative pain relief in patients after laparoscopy-assisted colectomy.     

Epidural anesthesia during upper abdominal surgery provides better postoperative analgesia

Since repeated noxious stimuli may sensitize neuropathic pain receptors of the spinal cord, we tested the hypothesis that the appropriate blockade of surgical stimuli with epidural anesthesia during upper abdominal surgery would be beneficial for postoperative analgesia. Thirty-six adult patients undergoing either elective gastrectomy or open cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to receive either inhalational general anesthesia alone (group G) or epidural anesthesia along with light general anesthesia (group E) throughout the surgery. Postoperative pain management consisted of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with bupivacaine accompanied by the continuous infusion of buprenorphine. To assess postoperative pain, a visual analogue scale (VAS) was employed at 2, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. While there was no significant difference in the bupivacaine dose, more patients undergoing gastrectomy in group G required supplemental analgesics than those in group E, and the VAS scores in group E demonstrated significantly better postoperative analgesia compared to group G after both types of surgery. Thus, an appropriate epidural blockade during upper abdominal surgery likely provides better postoperative pain relief.     

Effect of continuous epidural infusion of morphine for postoperative analgesia on pituitary-adrenocortical function

Plasma levels of cortisol, ACTH and beta-endorphin like immunoreactivity (beta-ELI) were measured to evaluate postoperative pain relief with epidural morphine and systemic analgesics in conjunction with endocrine functions in 16 patients who underwent gastrectomy. Eight of these patients (epidural morphine group) obtained postoperative analgesia with continuous epidural infusion of morphine with a pump as in our previous report. A bolus of epidural morphine was administered through an indwelling thoracic (Th8,9) catheter at 3 hrs prior to the proposed end of the surgery, which was followed with continuous epidural infusion of morphine at a rate of 0.167-0.042 mg.hr-1 with a pump (CADD-PCA, Model 5200P, Pharmacia) during and after anesthesia and surgery with gradual decrease in dose until the third postoperative day. The remaining eight patients (systemic analgesics group) repeatedly received systemic pentazocine and buprenorphine when needed. Plasma cortisol levels increased significantly at the end of surgery and after in both groups. However plasma concentrations of cortisol in the epidural morphine group were significantly lower than those in the systemic analgesics group on the first and second postoperative days. Plasma levels of ACTH and beta-ELI increased significantly at the end of surgery but returned to levels of the previous day in both groups postoperatively. Our study suggests that continuous epidural infusion of morphine is adequate for postoperative pain relief and has suppressing effect on plasma cortisol levels as compared with systemic analgesics regimen.     

Plasma catecholamine levels following continuous epidural infusion of morphine for postoperative analgesia in surgical patients

Plasma catecholamine levels were measured to evaluate postoperative pain relief either with epidural morphine or systemic analgesics in sixteen patients who underwent gastrectomy. Eight patients (epidural morphine group) obtained postoperative analgesia with continuous epidural morphine with a pump (CADD-PCA, Model 5200P, Pharmacia). A bolus of morphine was administered through an indwelling thoracic (Th8 X 9) epidural catheter 3 hrs prior to the proposed end of the surgery, which was followed with continuous epidural infusion of morphine at a rate of 0.167-0.042mg.hr-1 by the pump during and after anesthesia and surgery with gradual decrease in dose until the third postoperative day. The remaining eight patients (systemic analgesics group) received repeatedly intravenous or intramuscular pentazocine and buprenorphine when needed. Plasma epinephrine levels increased significantly at the end of surgery in both groups, and were higher in the systemic analgesics group than those in the epidural morphine group. In the epidural morphine group, the catecholamine levels decreased to the previous day's levels on the first postoperative day and afterward, but remained high during three postoperative days in the systemic analgesics group. Plasma norepinephrine levels increased significantly at the end of surgery and afterward in both groups. However, they were significantly higher in the systemic analgesics group than in the epidural morphine group. Plasma dopamine levels were unchanged in the epidural morphine group during the surgical procedures, but they increased significantly on the first postoperative day and thereafter in the systemic analgesics group. Our study suggests that continuous epidural infusion of morphine is adequate for postoperative pain relief and exerts a suppressing effect on plasma catecholamine levels as compared with systemic analgesics regimen.     

Continuous epidural administration of midazolam and bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia

BACKGROUND: Midazolam has been reported to have a spinally mediated analgesic effect. Clinically, single-shot epidural or spinal administration of midazolam has been shown to have an analgesic effect on perioperative pain. In this study, we investigated the analgesic effect of continuous epidural administration of midazolam with bupivacaine on postoperative pain. METHODS: Four groups of 20 patients who underwent gastrectomy or cholecystectomy were studied. Continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine 100 mg (Group C), bupivacaine 100 mg + midazolam 10 mg (Group M10), or bupivacaine 100 mg + midazolam 20 mg (Group M20) in 40 ml per 12 h was started after surgery using the balloon infuser. Group I received intermittent epidural bupivacaine (2.5 mg.ml-1) 6 ml every 2 h. When necessary, an indomethacin suppository and then a single epidural shot of bupivacaine (2.5 mg.ml-1) 6 ml was administered. Blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, analgesic area, analgesia score, and sedation score were monitored for 12 h postoperatively. Memory and frequencies of supplemental analgesia (indomethacin suppositories and epidural bupivacaine) were also checked. RESULTS: Group M20 showed a significantly wider area of pinprick analgesia and better analgesia scores than other groups. The need for rescue analgesics were significantly less in Group M20. Sedation and amnesia were more pronounced in Group M20 than the other groups. CONCLUSION: Adding midazolam (10 to 20 mg per 12 h) to continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine for postoperative pain can provide a better analgesia, amnesia and sedation than bupivacaine alone.     

Significance of patient-controlled analgesia in combination with continuous epidural block for patients who underwent posterior lumbar surgery

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) combined with continuous epidural block in patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery. In group 1 (postoperative PCA group), 23 patients were administered postoperative continuous epidural block in combination with analgesics, which was self-regulated by the patient using a device. In contrast, the 22 patients in group 2 (control group) received suppositories or intramuscular injections of analgesics on request. The following factors were compared between the two groups: pain relief according to the visual analog scale for pain assessment, the frequency of administration of analgesics, and side effects of the postoperative analgesia. The patients in group 1 had more satisfactory relief of pain according to the visual analog scale for pain assessment and needed suppositories and intramuscular injection of analgesics less frequently on the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd postoperative day. The time spent by nurses on pain management in group 1 was less than that in group 2. No patient had any serious complications in either group. In conclusion, the present patient-controlled method combined with postoperative continuous epidural block could decrease the intensity of postoperative pain and the amount of time spent by nurses on the administration of postoperative analgesics after lumbar spine surgery. Received: 17 July 1997 Revised: 30 September 1997 Accepted: 14 October 1997     

Continuous intravenous infusion of pethidine or buprenorphine for postoperative analgesia

Efficacy of continuous intravenous infusion for postoperative analgesia was evaluated in 20 patients who had undergone abdominal surgery for 72 hours postoperatively. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups: one group received continuous intravenous infusion of buprenorphine at 0.2 mg.24 hr-1 using a non-electronic, portable infusor 0.5 ml.hr-1 type (Baxter), while the other received infusion of pethidine at 50 mg.hr-1. During the first 12 postoperative hours, the frequency of "Fair" rating which indicated need of supplemental analgetics was significantly higher than the later 12-hour period until 72 hours in both groups. However, although during the first 12 hours continuous intravenous infusion was inadequate to alleviate postoperative pain compared with other 12-hour period, no patient received supplemental analgesics more than 2 times. During the 24 to 72 postoperative hours, 70% of cases needed no supplemental analgesics to alleviate postoperative pain. Continuous intravenous infusion of 0.2 mg.hr-1 buprenorphine or 50 mg.hr-1 pethidine was inadequate for postoperative analgesia during immediately after the operation to 36 hours postoperatively, especially during the first 12-hour period. However, this infusion was effective during 36 to 72 postoperative hours. There was no significant difference between buprenorphine group and pethidine group.     

Postoperative nausea and vomiting caused by epidural infusion following gynecological laparoscopic surgery: fentanyl and ropivacaine versus ropivacaine alone

BACKGROUND:Patients who undergo gynecological laparoscopic surgery often begin to eat and ambulate soon after surgery. However, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) can postpone recovery. METHODS: We prospectively investigated the incidence of PONV, along with oral intake and ambulation in patients who received an epidural infusion following gynecological laparoscopic surgery with combined epidural and general anesthesia. Forty patients were randomly and equally divided into 2 groups: group R, who received patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with 0.2% ropivacaine, and group FR, who received a continuous epidural infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine with fentanyl (CEA). PONV and pain were scored during the early (0-6 hours) and late (6-24 hours) postoperative periods. RESULTS: PONV incidence and scores were significantly lower in group R (5.3%) than group FR (70.6%) during the late period. Further, patients in group R ate significantly more than group FR at both lunch and dinner, and 2 patients could not ambulate the day after surgery in the FR group. There was no significant difference in analgesia requested between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found that PCEA with ropivacaine alone resulted in a significantly lower incidence of PONV and did not disturb eating and ambulation following gynecological laparoscopic surgery, as compared to patients who received CEA.     

Double epidural catheter with ropivacaine versus intravenous morphine: a comparison for postoperative analgesia after scoliosis correction surgery

BACKGROUND: Major spine surgery with a dorsal or ventrodorsal approach causes severe postoperative pain. The use of continuous epidural analgesia through one or two epidural catheters placed intraoperatively by the surgeon has been shown to provide efficient postoperative pain control. In this prospective unblinded study, the authors compared the efficacy of continuous intravenous morphine with a continuous double epidural catheter technique with ropivacaine after scoliosis correction. METHODS: Thirty patients with American Society of Anesthesiology physical status I-III were prospectively randomized to either the morphine group or the epidural group. At the end of surgery, patients in the epidural group received two epidural catheters placed by the surgeon, one directed cephalad and one caudally. Correct placement was checked radiographically. Postoperative analgesia until the first postoperative morning was performed with remifentanil target-control infusion for all patients. From that time remifentanil was stopped and continuous intravenous analgesia with morphine or double epidural analgesia with ropivacaine 0.3% was initiated (T0 = beginning of study). Pain at rest and pain in motion (using a visual analog scale from 0-100), the amount of rescue analgesics, sensory level, motor blockade, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and pruritus were assessed every 6 h and bowel function was assessed every 12 h until T72 (end of study). Two days later, patient satisfaction was assessed. RESULTS: Pain scores at rest were significantly decreased in the epidural group at all time points except at T12, T60, and T72. Pain scores in motion were significantly decreased in the epidural group at T24, T48, and T72. Bowel activity was significantly better in the epidural group at T24, T36, T48, and T60. Postoperative nausea and vomiting and pruritus occurred significantly less frequently in the epidural group. No complications related to the epidural catheter occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Both methods provide efficient postoperative analgesia. However, double epidural catheter technique provides better postoperative analgesia, earlier recovery of bowel function, fewer side effects, and a higher patient satisfaction.     

Evaluation of postoperative pain relief by infiltration of bupivacaine or epidural block after laparoscopic cholecystectomy]

We compared the analgesic effect of bupivacaine infiltration into surgical wounds with that of epidural block after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Forty-five patients (ASA physical status I-II) for LC were randomized into three groups (n = 15 in each group). Patients received only general anesthesia (Group C), received infiltration of 0.5% bupivacaine into the surgical wound before surgery combined with general anesthesia (Group L), or received epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia (Group E). Postoperative pain was assessed using visual analogue scale (scale: 0-10) at 1, 2, 6 and 12 hours after the operation, the need for additional supplemental analgesics, and the cost of anesthesia. Visual analogue scale in Group C at 1, 2, or 6 hours was significantly greater than that of Group L and E. The number of patients who needed supplemental analgesics was 9 in Group C, 5 in Group L, and 2 in Group E. The cost of pharmaceutical and anesthetic practice of Group E was more expensive than Group L and C. In conclusion, infiltration of bupivacaine combined with general anesthesia is an effective and economical method of postoperative pain relief.     

腹腔镜下近端胃切除术治疗近端早期胃癌

目的:探讨腹腔镜下近端胃切除术治疗近端早期胃癌的可行性与安全性。方法:回顾性分析2007年6月—2010年12月间手术治疗的72例近端早期胃癌患者资料,其中38例行腹腔镜下近端胃切除术(LAPG组),34例行腹腔镜下胃大部切除术(LAG组)。比较两组患者的一般情况、术中与术后各项指标,并用Visick评分比较两组患者术后胃食管反流症状。结果:两组患者年龄、性别、体质量指数、并存疾病、手术时间及术后住院天数差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05),但LAPG组术中出血量明显少于LAG组(P<0.05)。两组患者术后肛门排气时间、开始进食时间及早、晚期并发症发生率差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05),但LAPG组术后Visick评分明显高于LAG组(P<0.05)。两组患者术后病理指标、手术前后的营养学指标变化、术后生存率差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论:腹腔镜下近端胃切除术能够安全的应用于近端早期胃癌的治疗,但应警惕术后胃食管反流症状的发生。     

Double Epidural Catheter with Ropivacaine versus Intravenous Morphine: A Comparison for Postoperative Analgesia after Scoliosis Correction Surgery

Background: Major spine surgery with a dorsal or ventrodorsal approach causes severe postoperative pain. The use of continuous epidural analgesia through one or two epidural catheters placed intraoperatively by the surgeon has been shown to provide efficient postoperative pain control. In this prospective unblinded study, the authors compared the efficacy of continuous intravenous morphine with a continuous double epidural catheter technique with ropivacaine after scoliosis correction.

Methods: Thirty patients with American Society of Anesthesiology physical status I-III were prospectively randomized to either the morphine group or the epidural group. At the end of surgery, patients in the epidural group received two epidural catheters placed by the surgeon, one directed cephalad and one caudally. Correct placement was checked radiographically. Postoperative analgesia until the first postoperative morning was performed with remifentanil target-control infusion for all patients. From that time remifentanil was stopped and continuous intravenous analgesia with morphine or double epidural analgesia with ropivacaine 0.3% was initiated (T0 = beginning of study). Pain at rest and pain in motion (using a visual analog scale from 0-100), the amount of rescue analgesics, sensory level, motor blockade, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and pruritus were assessed every 6 h and bowel function was assessed every 12 h until T72 (end of study). Two days later, patient satisfaction was assessed.

Results: Pain scores at rest were significantly decreased in the epidural group at all time points except at T12, T60, and T72. Pain scores in motion were significantly decreased in the epidural group at T24, T48, and T72. Bowel activity was significantly better in the epidural group at T24, T36, T48, and T60. Postoperative nausea and vomiting and pruritus occurred significantly less frequently in the epidural group. No complications related to the epidural catheter occurred.     

Epidural analgesia with bupivacaine reduces postoperative paralytic ileus after hysterectomy

This study was undertaken to compare the effects of postoperative bupivacaine epidural analgesia with those of intermittent injections of ketobemidone (a synthetic opioid) on postoperative bowel motility in patients who had had hysterectomies. The epidural group (N = 20) received continuous epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine postoperatively for 26-30 hours and the control group (N = 20) received intermittent injections of ketobemidone for postoperative pain relief. Postoperative bowel movements and propulsive colonic motility were estimated from the first passage of flatus and feces and by following radiopaque markers by serial abdominal radiographs. In the epidural group, the times for first passing of flatus (31 +/- 22 hours; mean +/- SD) and feces (70 +/- 44 hours) were significantly shorter than in the control group (flatus 58 +/- 14 hours and feces 103 +/- 26 hours). The average position of the markers was significantly more distally in the epidural group immediately after operation and the markers continued to move forward during the first postoperative day. In the control group, the markers did not move during this period. The results demonstrate that postoperative bowel peristalsis returned earlier in the patients given epidural analgesia with bupivacaine for pain relief than in patients given a narcotic.     

腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术在老年人胃癌中的应用

目的 探讨腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术在老年胃癌患者中应用的可行性及临床疗效.方法 2007年1月至2009年12月期间,福建医科大学附属协和医院胃外科对255例年龄在65岁以上的老年胃癌患者施行D2根治术,其中行腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术患者（腹腔镜组）116例,行常规开腹手术患者（开腹组）139例.比较两组患者术中、术后恢复、并发症发生及术后生存情况,并对术后并发症的危险因素进行分析.结果 腹腔镜组术中出血量和术中输血例数均少于开腹组,术后排气时间、进食流质时间和住院时间均短于开腹组,差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.01）;而两组患者手术时间和淋巴结清扫数目的差异无统计学意义（均P＞0.05）.腹腔镜组术后并发症发生率为15.5％（18/116）,明显低于开腹组的28.1％（39/139）（P＜0.05）.是否行腹腔镜手术（P＜0.05）、手术时间（P＜0.01）和术前合并症（P＜0.01）是老年人胃癌术后并发症的独立危险因素;手术时间（P＜0.05）和术前合并症（P＜0.01）是老年人腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术后并发症的独立危险因素.腹腔镜组和开腹组患者术后平均生存时间分别为23.0和22.5个月,差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）.结论 老年人腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术能够达到与开腹手术相同的根治效果,且具有明显的微创优势.手术时间和术前合并症是老年人腹腔镜胃癌根治术后并发症的独立危险因素.     

Postoperative enteroparesis by patient-controlled analgesia combined with continuous epidural block for patients after posterior lumbar surgery

This study evaluated postoperative enteroparesis influenced by patient-controlled analgesia combined with continuous epidural block in patients who underwent posterior lumbar surgery. One hundred nine patients were divided into three groups at random (group 1, controls (18 patients); group 2, postoperative patient-controlled analgesia and continuous epidural block (45 patients); group 3, one-shot epidural analgesia, postoperative patient-controlled analgesia, and continuous epidural block (46 patients). The patients in groups 2 and 3 had more satisfactory pain relief and needed analgesics less frequently. However, their clinical abdominal findings the morning after surgery were worse than those in control patients. The times when patients could take any nourishment and eat solid food (rice) were delayed by patient-controlled analgesia with continuous epidural block.     

A comparison of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with epidural anesthesia for postoperative pain relief after transurethral resection of the prostate

BACKGROUND: We compared combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (S group) and epidural anesthesia (E group) in terms of pain control after transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P). METHODS: All 32 patients received 0.2% ropivacaine at a rate of 2 ml x hr(-1) by a portable disposable pump postoperatively. RESULTS: S group was superior to E group in urethral pain control within three hours after operation. E group was superior to S group in decrease of back pain over six hours after operation. Fifteen patients (47%) suffered from irritability or low back pain and needed rescue analgesics. CONCLUSIONS: Our result indicates that 0.2% ropivacaine at a rate of 2 ml x hr(-1) is not satisfactory to relieve the postoperative pain. Long acting local anesthetics for spinal anesthesia are not suitable for TUR-P. Supplemental administration of opioid to epidural space or higher rate of continuous epidural infusor after operation might be better analgesic choice for TUR-P.     

Intraoperative Epidural Analgesia Combined with Ketamine Provides Effective Preventive Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Major Digestive Surgery

Background: As a broader definition of preemptive analgesia, preventive analgesia aims to prevent the sensitization of central nervous system, hence the development of pathologic pain after tissular injury. To demonstrate benefits from preventive treatment, objective measurement of postoperative pain such as wound hyperalgesia and persistent pain should be evaluated. The current study assessed the role and timing of epidural analgesia in this context.

Methods: In a randomized, double-blinded trial, 85 patients scheduled to undergo neoplastic colonic resection were included. All the patients received a thoracic epidural catheter, systemic ketamine at a antihyperalgesic dose, and general anesthesia. Continuous infusion of analgesics belonging to the same class was administered by either intravenous or epidural route before incision until 72 h after surgery. Patients were allocated to four groups to receive intraoperative intravenous lidocaine-sufentanil-clonidine or epidural bupivacaine-sufentanil-clonidine followed postoperatively by either intravenous (lidocaine-morphine-clonidine) or epidural (bupivacaine-sufentanil-clonidine) patient-controlled analgesia. Postoperative pain scores (visual analog scale), analgesic consumption, wound area of punctuate hyperalgesia, residual pain, and analgesics needed from 2 weeks until 12 months were recorded.

Results: Analgesic requirements, visual analog scale scores, and area of hyperalgesia were significantly higher in the intravenous treatment group (intravenous-intravenous), and more patients reported residual pain from 2 weeks until 1 yr (28%). Although postoperative pain measurements did not differ, postoperative epidural treatment (intravenous-epidural) was less effective to prevent residual pain at 1 yr (11%; P = 0.2 with intravenous-intravenous group) than intraoperative one (epidural-epidural and epidural-intravenous groups) (0%; P = 0.01 with intravenous-intravenous group).     

Epidural morphine: a clinical double-blind study of dosage

The purpose of this randomized double-blind study was to determine the optimal dose of epidural morphine by establishing a dose-effect relationship. The 139 patients, who had orthopedic operations on the lower extremities, received continuous lumbar epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine, 0.75%, with or without the addition of 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 mg of morphine hydrochloride. Analgesia and side effects were determined during the first 24 hr postoperatively. In the 12-hr period after epidural anesthesia, arterial blood gas tensions were compared between those patients who received 5 mg morphine (n = 13) and those who received no morphine (n = 14). Patients who received 2 or more mg of morphine were less likely to require the administration of postoperative systemic analgesics (P less than 0.05). The addition of 2 or more mg of morphine to bupivacaine, 0.75%, reduced postoperative pain intensity (P less than 0.05); 5 mg of morphine reduced pain intensity for the longest time. Frequency of catheterization and pruritus increased dose-dependently. The mean PaCO2 after 5 mg of epidural morphine averaged 5 mm Hg higher than in the control group, indicating minor respiratory depression, better analgesia, or both. The dose of 3 mg of epidural morphine added to the local anesthetic is recommended for postoperative analgesia after surgery of the lower extremity; it is a compromise that provides adequate analgesia with an acceptably low frequency and intensity of side effects.     

Intraoperative epidural analgesia combined with ketamine provides effective preventive analgesia in patients undergoing major digestive surgery

BACKGROUND: As a broader definition of preemptive analgesia, preventive analgesia aims to prevent the sensitization of central nervous system, hence the development of pathologic pain after tissular injury. To demonstrate benefits from preventive treatment, objective measurement of postoperative pain such as wound hyperalgesia and persistent pain should be evaluated. The current study assessed the role and timing of epidural analgesia in this context. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blinded trial, 85 patients scheduled to undergo neoplastic colonic resection were included. All the patients received a thoracic epidural catheter, systemic ketamine at a antihyperalgesic dose, and general anesthesia. Continuous infusion of analgesics belonging to the same class was administered by either intravenous or epidural route before incision until 72 h after surgery. Patients were allocated to four groups to receive intraoperative intravenous lidocaine-sufentanil-clonidine or epidural bupivacaine-sufentanil-clonidine followed postoperatively by either intravenous (lidocaine-morphine-clonidine) or epidural (bupivacaine-sufentanil-clonidine) patient-controlled analgesia. Postoperative pain scores (visual analog scale), analgesic consumption, wound area of punctuate hyperalgesia, residual pain, and analgesics needed from 2 weeks until 12 months were recorded. RESULTS: Analgesic requirements, visual analog scale scores, and area of hyperalgesia were significantly higher in the intravenous treatment group (intravenous-intravenous), and more patients reported residual pain from 2 weeks until 1 yr (28%). Although postoperative pain measurements did not differ, postoperative epidural treatment (intravenous-epidural) was less effective to prevent residual pain at 1 yr (11%; P = 0.2 with intravenous-intravenous group) than intraoperative one (epidural-epidural and epidural-intravenous groups) (0%; P = 0.01 with intravenous-intravenous group). CONCLUSION: Combined with an antihyperalgesic dose of ketamine, intraoperative epidural analgesia provides effective preventive analgesia after major digestive surgery.     

Effects of epidural administration of local anaesthetics or morphine on postoperative nitrogen loss and catabolic hormones

To examine the effects of postoperative epidural analgesia with local anaesthetics or morphine on the excess nitrogen loss after upper abdominal surgery and to assess the roles of catabolic hormones in the nitrogen loss, urinary excretion of nitrogen and catecholamines and plasma concentrations of cortisol and glucagon were measured in three groups of patients undergoing elective gastrectomy. Group G patients received the operation under general anaesthesia, and their postoperative pain was relieved by intermittent injections of analgesics. Group PE received prolonged epidural analgesia with local anaesthetics during and after surgery. Group EM received epidural analgesia intra-operatively and epidural morphine postoperatively. Urinary nitrogen excretion during the first three postoperative days was significantly less in the PE and EM groups than in the G group, and the PE group excreted slightly less nitrogen than the EM group. In the G group, urinary excretion of adrenaline increased mainly on the day of operation, and noradrenaline chiefly on postoperative days. These catecholamine responses were almost completely abolished in the PE group, and significantly inhibited in the EM group. Plasma cortisol response was most remarkable shortly after the operation and then decreased in all groups, but was significantly lower in the two epidural groups than in the G group throughout the study. Plasma glucagon increased postoperatively in all groups, and the increase was less pronounced in both epidural groups than in the G group. These results suggested that an elevated sympathetic activity, represented by increased noradrenaline excretion and elicited by painful nociceptive and sympathetic nervous afferents, is responsible for the postoperative nitrogen loss which is mediated by glucagon and cortisol.