Adjuvant ipilimumab in stage III melanoma: New landscape,new questions

The recently reported significant prolongation of overall survival with ipilimumab as adjuvant in high-risk stage III melanoma patients represents an important event in the adjuvant treatment landscape. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 18071 trial demonstrated a 28% reduction in risk of death in patients treated with ipilimumab at 10 mg/kg (hazard ratio for death, 0.72; 95.1% CI, 0.58−0.88; P = 0.001) compared with placebo. All end-points—recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant-metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS)—showed similar benefits. Survival rates at 5 years in ipilimumab-treated patients were OS 11%, DMFS 9% and RFS 11% higher than in placebo-treated patients. Global Health quality-of-life scores were not significantly different between treatment arms, in spite of significant adverse event rates that resulted in only 42% of patients receiving more than four doses of ipilimumab and only 28.9% of patients going beyond 1 year of treatment. Grades 3–4 immune-related adverse events occurred in 41.6% of ipilimumab-treated patients and in 2.7% of placebo-treated patients. One can speculate on dose and duration of treatment, as well as on the requirement for complete lymph-node dissection in sentinel-node-positive patients. The remaining role of interferons will be discussed regarding differences in sensitivity profiles—such as in ulcerated melanoma versus non-ulcerated melanoma—and access to new drugs. Ongoing trials with targeted agents and with anti programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) agents may bring significant additional results in the next few years that will redefine how we treat stage III patients. Overall, pricing of new treatments will determine access and whether patients will actually benefit from new treatment options.     

Feasibility of high-dose interferon-alpha2b adjuvant therapy for high-risk resected cutaneous melanoma

The Kirkwood high-dose interferon-alpha2b adjuvant therapy in high-risk-of-recurrence melanoma patients (stage IIb-III) demonstrated a benefit in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) (three trials out of three) and overall survival (OS) (two trials out of three). These important and exclusive results match with a grade 3-4 toxicity in about 75% of patients. This problem is the most limiting of this treatment. The aim of the study was to check these results and the feasibility of this treatment using the original Kirkwood schedule of 52 weeks, with appropriate dose modification, until unacceptable toxicity or progression of disease. From 23rd February 1998 until 29th July 2002, 26 patients were treated (mean age 45 years; range 25-70) with high-dose interferon-alpha2b adjuvant therapy. All patients were evaluated for toxicity, whilst 24 out of 26 (92%) were evaluated for OS and DFS. All patients were in stage IIB/III of the new American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification. The sentinel node biopsy was performed in 19 out of 26 (73.1%) patients (clinical N0). At 31st December 2002, 20 out of 26 (77%) were still alive, whilst four (15%) had died and two (8%) were lost to follow-up. Of the patients still alive, 14 (70%) were disease free. The patients lost to follow-up refused to continue therapy for toxicity related treatment: one of them was disease free, whereas one was relapsed. There were 11 observed relapses (44%). The DFS ranged from 2 to 27 months. Among the patients, the maximal DFS is, at the time of writing, 59 months. The DFS mean is 29 months, the median is 19 months. The OS calculation will be performed at the end of 5 years observation. Now our attention is on therapy tolerability. In 18 patients out of 26 (69%) we noted at least one grade 3-4 toxicity, in accordance with literature data. The most common toxicities were haematological, hepatic, fever and asthenia. Overall, only two grade 4 events (one hepatic and one haematological) were reported. Grade 3 toxicity was hepatic in 23% of patients and haematological in 50%. Grade 2 toxicity was hepatic in 19%, haematological in 27% and fever in 50%. Grade 1 toxicities were hepatic, haematological and fever in 15, 15 and 35% of patients, respectively. Asthenia was severe in 54%, mild in 31% and not found in 15%. In 39, 4 and 15%, respectively, we have reported no hepatic, haematological or fever events. Less common toxicities were nausea, diarrhoea, headache, arthralgia, alopecia and one case of hypothyroidism. As a result of these reported toxicities, of 23 patients evaluable with regard to the protocol, 12 underwent dose reductions, six suspended treatment for disease progression, eight delayed treatment for toxicity, two interrupted treatment indefinitely for unacceptable toxicity or refused treatment, two refused to continue, two patients had no delay in treatment and three did not receive any delay or dose reduction. Of three patients still in therapy, just one has so far received a delay in treatment. Overall, only four patients (17%) interrupted therapy for toxicity related events, whereas 83% continued with the expected program: 52 weeks of therapy with appropriate dose modifications.     

Adjuvant high-dose interferon for cutaneous melanoma is most beneficial for patients with early stage III disease

BACKGROUND: Evidence from randomized trials in the pre-sentinel lymph node biopsy era indicate that adjuvant treatment with high-dose interferon-alpha (IFN) increases recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with high-risk melanoma. However, to the authors' knowledge, the role of this treatment in selected patients with early stage III disease has not been well studied. METHODS: The clinical and pathologic characteristics of 486 patients undergoing surgical treatment for stage III melanoma were evaluated and the authors compared outcomes for those given adjuvant treatment with IFN with those patients who had surgery alone. A particular focus was on the effect of IFN therapy on RFS and overall survival (OS) among those patients with stage IIIA disease. RESULTS: The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 5.2 years; the 5-year RFS and OS rates for the entire group were 41% and 53%, respectively. Adjuvant IFN was given to 141 patients (29%). On multivariate analysis, IFN was found to be the only independent predictor for RFS in patients with stage IIIA disease (hazards ratio of 0.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-0.9 [P = .02]). IFN was not found to be associated with increased RFS in patients with more advanced lymph node disease (stage IIIB and stage IIIC). IFN appeared to have no effect on OS in any patient with stage III disease. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant treatment with IFN improves RFS in melanoma patients with early stage III disease. The results of the current study should help guide management when considering adjuvant treatment for these patients.     

Adjuvant vaccination with melanoma antigen-pulsed dendritic cells in stage III melanoma patients

Dendritic cells may be successfully used to induce in vivo-specific anti-tumor responses when combined with the appropriate antigen in the appropriate context. The purpose of this study was to evaluate efficacy of peptide-loaded DC vaccine in high-risk stage III melanoma patients after lymph node dissection (LND). HLA-A2⁺, -A1⁺, or -A3⁺ melanoma patients (N?=?22), stage III, N1b-N3, received 5?C16 (median: 11) DC vaccines loaded with MHC class-I-restricted melanoma peptides respective to the patient??s haplotype, and with autologous tumor lysate, if available. Vaccinated patients were matched to unvaccinated stage III controls (22 of 869) by sex, number of metastatic lymph nodes, extracapsular involvement, LND type, Breslow stage, and ulceration. Vaccination elicited cutaneous delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) or/and IFN-??-producing CD8⁺ cell response to melanoma peptides in 15 of 22 patients. Three-year overall survival (OS) rate was 68.2% in the vaccinated group versus 25.7% in the control group, P value accounting for matching: 0.0290. In a Cox regression model, hazard ratio (HR) for death of vaccinated patients was 0.31 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.10?C0.94]. The corresponding values for 3-year disease-free survival rate were 40.9 versus 14.5%, P?=?0.1083; HR of recurrence for vaccinated, 0.46 (95% CI: 0.18?C1.22). There was no grade >1 toxicity. The DC/peptide vaccine was well tolerated and elicited immune responses to melanoma antigens. Vaccinated patients had significantly longer OS after LND than the matched controls, but a significant improvement in the primary endpoint DFS was not achieved.     

Adjuvant therapy of melanoma patients (stage II, III): a pilot immuno-toxicological study

A pilot study was conducted to assess the tolerability and the effect on host immunity of a post-surgery adjuvant treatment of melanoma patients with an anti-angiogenic agent, Tamoxifen (TAM, 20 mg/die p.o., daily), combined with immunomodulating cytokines, i.e. recombinant interleukin-2 (IL-2, 4 MUI/m2 s.c., day 8,10,12) and alpha-2b-interferon (IFN, 3 MUI/m2 i.m., day 15,17,19), starting a new cycle on day 21, for a total of 12 cycles. Fifty patients (pts) entered into the study, 27 males and 23 females with a median age of 55 years (range 25-75), performance status (ECOG) 0 with melanoma stage IIA (12 patients), stage IIB (28 patients), stage III (10 patients). Preliminary in vitro studies showed that TAM does not interfere with up-regulation of natural immunity induced by IFN, IL-2, or IFN + IL-2 in normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells (MNC). The clinical study indicates that the protocol was well tolerated. Increase of NK and LAK activity of patient MNC was observed on day 15. The mean disease-free interval was 10 months and 40 pts were alive at 5 years of follow-up. Further investigations should be performed to test effectiveness of this protocol in a randomized study.     

Q-TWiST analysis comparing ipilimumab/dacarbazine vs placebo/dacarbazine for patients with stage III/IV melanoma

Background:

Study CA184024 was a multinational, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study comparing ipilimumab/dacarbazine (DTIC) vs placebo/DTIC in patients with untreated stage III/IV melanoma, which showed that ipilimumab significantly improves survival in patients with metastatic melanoma. The objective of this analysis was to compare the quality-adjusted survival experience among patients in this trial.

Methods:

Survival time was partitioned into health states: toxicity, time before progression without toxicity, and relapse until death or end of follow-up. Q-TWiST (quality-adjusted time without symptoms of disease or toxicity of treatment) was calculated as the utility-weighted sum of the mean health state durations. Analyses were repeated over extended follow-up periods.

Results:

Based on a combination of trial-based and external utility scores, the Q-TWiST difference in this trial was 0.50 months (P=0.0326) favoring ipilimumab after 1 year. The Q-TWiST difference was 1.5 months with 2 years of follow-up (P=0.0091), 2.36 months at 3 years (P=0.005) and 3.28 months at 4 years (P=0.0074).

Conclusion:

During the first year of study, there was little difference between groups in quality-adjusted survival. However, after 2, 3 and 4 years follow-up for patients with extended survival, the benefits of IPI+DTIC vs PLA+DTIC for advanced melanoma continue to accrue.     

Adjuvant therapy for patients with high-risk malignant melanoma

The role of adjuvant therapy in the treatment of patients with high-risk malignant melanoma remains an area of intense investigation. The initial enthusiasm for high-dose interferon has been tempered by the results of more recent studies that allow for conflicting interpretations. Vaccine therapy trials have failed to clearly demonstrate a survival benefit, although several trials are currently ongoing. Recent studies of the role of chemotherapy suggest there may be combinations that have a survival benefit which deserve further study. This article will address patient selection and staging workup, and review options for treatment.     

Concurrent adjuvant radiotherapy and interferon-alpha2b for resected high risk stage III melanoma -- a retrospective single centre study

Interferon-alpha2b (IFNalpha2b) is the only form of systemic adjuvant therapy for stage III melanoma with documented survival benefit. Radiotherapy can also be utilized in the adjuvant setting in patients at high risk of nodal basin recurrence. As IFNalpha2b is associated with substantial toxicity, we sought to determine both the systemic and radiation-related toxicities in patients treated with combined adjuvant IFNalpha2b and regional adjuvant radiotherapy delivered in the setting of a single institution. Eighteen consecutive patients who commenced adjuvant IFNalpha2b between November 1997 and August 2002 were analysed retrospectively for toxicities associated with the combination of IFNalpha2b and adjuvant radiotherapy (40-50 Gy in 15-25 fractions) to nodal basins delivered during the maintenance phase of IFNalpha2b therapy (median dose during radiotherapy of 6.5 MU/m three times per week). Seven out of 18 patients who received concurrent radiotherapy and IFNalpha2b displayed grade 3 skin reactions. Severe radiation-induced toxicity was seen in three further patients, one who developed radiation pneumonitis, one who developed severe oral mucositis, and one who developed wound dehiscence that took 10 months to resolve. Non-radiation-related toxicity to IFNalpha2b therapy was typical for this dose and schedule. We conclude that concurrent use of adjuvant radiotherapy and IFNalpha2b may enhance radiation-induced toxicity. However, overall we found concurrent radiation and IFNalpha2b could be safely delivered with appropriate clinical monitoring.     

Circulating tumor DNA predicts survival in patients with resected high-risk stage II/III melanoma

BackgroundPatients with high-risk stage II/III resected melanoma commonly develop distant metastases. At present, we cannot differentiate between patients who will recur or those who are cured by surgery. We investigated if circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can predict relapse and survival in patients with resected melanoma.Patients and methodsWe carried out droplet digital polymerase chain reaction to detect BRAF and NRAS mutations in plasma taken after surgery from 161 stage II/III high-risk melanoma patients enrolled in the AVAST-M adjuvant trial.ResultsMutant BRAF or NRAS ctDNA was detected (≥1 copy of mutant ctDNA) in 15/132 (11%) BRAF mutant patient samples and 4/29 (14%) NRAS mutant patient samples. Patients with detectable ctDNA had a decreased disease-free interval [DFI; hazard ratio (HR) 3.12; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.79–5.47; P < 0.0001] and distant metastasis-free interval (DMFI; HR 3.22; 95% CI 1.80–5.79; P < 0.0001) versus those with undetectable ctDNA. Detectable ctDNA remained a significant predictor after adjustment for performance status and disease stage (DFI: HR 3.26, 95% CI 1.83–5.83, P < 0.0001; DMFI: HR 3.45, 95% CI 1.88–6.34, P < 0.0001). Five-year overall survival rate for patients with detectable ctDNA was 33% (95% CI 14%–55%) versus 65% (95% CI 56%–72%) for those with undetectable ctDNA. Overall survival was significantly worse for patients with detectable ctDNA (HR 2.63; 95% CI 1.40–4.96); P = 0.003) and remained significant after adjustment for performance status (HR 2.50, 95% CI 1.32–4.74, P = 0.005).ConclusionctDNA predicts for relapse and survival in high-risk resected melanoma and could aid selection of patients for adjuvant therapy.Clinical trial numberISRCTN 81261306     

Adjuvant high-dose interferon alfa-2b in patients with high-risk melanoma

We performed an analysis of toxicity and survival in stage III melanoma patients receiving adjuvant interferon alfa-2b (IFN). This was a retrospective single-arm analysis of 40 patients with stage III melanoma who received (IFN) administered at maximum tolerated doses of 20 mU/m2/day intravenously (i.v.) for 1 month and 10 mU/m2 three times per week subcutaneously (s.c.) for 48 weeks. Toxicity in our series is comparable to that experienced in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 1684 trial, except for higher rates of dose-limiting myelosuppression and hepatotoxicity. All 40 patients experienced constitutional symptoms, but only 14/40 (35%) experienced grade 3 to 4 symptoms. Of the 40 patients, 36 (90%) experienced neurologic symptoms, but only seven (17.5%) experienced grade 3 to 4 neurotoxicity. Two patients stopped treatment because of severe psychiatric symptoms; one patient attempted suicide, and a psychosis developed in another. Thirty-nine (97.5%) patients experienced myelosuppression; 31 (77.5%) developing grade 3 to 4 myelosuppression. Hepatotoxicity was evident in 39 (97.5%) patients, and 26 (65%) experienced grade 3 to 4 hepatotoxicity. Three patients (7.5%) experienced mild renal toxicity. At a median follow-up of 27 months from initiation of therapy, there have been 19 relapses (47.5% disease-free survival [DFS]) and 10 deaths (75% OS) resulting from progression of disease. The DFS compares with the treatment arm in ECOG 1684 at 27 months, but overall survival is higher in our series of patients at the same time point. In a single program setting, IFN can be administered with similar side effects and outcome profiles seen in multi-institutional studies. Modifications in the induction regimen resulted in notably higher hematologic and hepatic toxicities but did not preclude administering further therapy and did not result in increased attrition rate among patients: only nine patients (22.5%) had their treatment stopped as a result of IFN-related toxicity. In comparison, 26% of patients had to have their treatment discontinued because of toxicity in ECOG 1684.     

Adjuvant therapy of stage III and IV malignant melanoma using granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.

PURPOSE: To evaluate granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) as surgical adjuvant therapy in patients with malignant melanoma who are at high risk of recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight assessable patients with stage III or IV melanoma were treated in a phase II trial with long-term, chronic, intermittent GM-CSF after surgical resection of disease. Patients with stage III disease were required to have more than four positive nodes or a more than 3-cm mass. All patients were rendered clinically disease-free by surgery before enrollment. The GM-CSF was administered subcutaneously in 28-day cycles, such that a dose of 125 microg/m(2) was delivered daily for 14 days followed by 14 days of rest. Treatment cycles continued for 1 year or until disease recurrence. Patients were evaluated for toxicity and disease-free and overall survival. RESULTS: Overall and disease-free survival were significantly prolonged in patients who received GM-CSF compared with matched historical controls. The median survival duration was 37.5 months in the study patients versus 12.2 months in the matched controls (P <.001). GM-CSF was well tolerated; only one subject discontinued drug due to an adverse event (grade 2 injection site reaction). CONCLUSION: GM-CSF may provide an antitumor effect that prolongs survival and disease-free survival in patients with stage III and IV melanoma who are clinically disease-free. These results support institution of a prospective, randomized clinical trial to definitively determine the value of surgical adjuvant therapy with GM-CSF in such patients.     

Atypical neurological complications of ipilimumab therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma

Background

Ipilimumab is a novel FDA-approved recombinant human monoclonal antibody that blocks cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 and has been used to treat patients with metastatic melanoma. Immune-related neurological adverse effects include inflammatory myopathy, aseptic meningitis, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, Guillain-Barré syndrome, myasthenia gravis–type syndrome, sensorimotor neuropathy, and inflammatory enteric neuropathy. To date, there is no report for ipilimumab-induced chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), transverse myelitis (TM), or concurrent myositis and myasthenia gravis–type syndrome. Our objective is to raise early recognition of atypical neurological adverse events and to share our therapeutic approach.

Methods

We report 3 cases of metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab in which the patients developed CIDP, TM, and concurrent myositis and myasthenia gravis–type syndrome, respectively, at the MD Anderson Cancer Center between July 2012 and June 2013. Patients consented to release of medical information for publication/educational purposes.

Results

Our 3 cases of metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab developed CIDP, TM, and concurrent myositis and myasthenia gravis–type syndrome, respectively. The median time to onset of immune-related adverse events following ipilimumab treatment ranged from 1 to 2 weeks. Ipilimumab was discontinued due to the severe neurological symptoms. Plasmapheresis was initiated in the patients with CIDP and concurrent myositis and myasthenia gravis–type syndrome; high-dose intravenous steroids were given to the patient with TM, and significant clinical response was demonstrated.

Conclusions

Ipilimumab could induce a wide spectrum of neurological adverse effects. Our findings support the standard treatment of withholding or discontinuing ipilimumab. Plasmapheresis or high-dose intravenous steroids may be considered as the initial choice of treatment for severe ipilimumab-related neurological adverse events. Improvement of neurological symptoms may be seen within 2 weeks.     

Phase II study of ipilimumab in adolescents with unresectable stage III or IV malignant melanoma

BackgroundIpilimumab is approved for the treatment of advanced melanoma in adults; however, little information on the efficacy and safety of ipilimumab in younger patients is available.MethodsPatients aged 12 to <18 years with previously treated or untreated, unresectable stage III or IV malignant melanoma received ipilimumab 3 or 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Primary end-points were 1-year overall survival and safety.ResultsOver a period of 3.5 years, 12 patients received ipilimumab at either 3 mg/kg (n = 4) or 10 mg/kg (n = 8). The median number of ipilimumab doses was four for 3 mg/kg and three for 10 mg/kg. At 1 year, three of four patients on 3 mg/kg and five of eight patients on 10 mg/kg were alive. Two patients on 10 mg/kg had partial response, and one on 3 mg/kg had stable disease. One patient had durable partial response at 3 years without further treatment, at time of this report. There was one grade 3/4 immune-mediated adverse reaction with 3 mg/kg and five with 10 mg/kg. There were no treatment-related deaths. The study was stopped due to slow accrual.ConclusionsAt >1 year follow-up, ipilimumab demonstrated activity in melanoma patients aged 12 to <18 years, with a similar safety profile as that seen in adults. Our trial highlights the difficulties of enrolling younger patients with rare diseases in clinical trials for treatments that are approved in adults, suggesting adolescents with cancer types occurring predominantly in adults should be considered for inclusion in adult trials of promising new drugs.Clinical trial registration: NCT01696045.     

Adjuvant therapy with edrecolomab versus observation in stage II colon cancer: a multicenter randomized phase III study

BACKGROUND: In a phase III study recruiting patients with stage II colon cancer the effect of adjuvant therapy with edrecolomab, a murine monoclonal antibody to the cell-surface glycoprotein 17-1A, was compared to observation alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1997 until July 2000 a total of 377 patients were postoperatively stratified according to tumor stage (T3 vs. T4) and center, and randomly allocated to either treatment with edrecolomab (cohort A, n = 183) or observation (cohort B, n = 194). Patients in cohort A received a total of 900 mg edrecolomab. The study was terminated prematurely because of discontinuation of drug supply in Germany. RESULTS: 305 patients were eligible for the primary endpoint of overall survival and 282 patients for disease-free survival. After a median follow-up of 42 months overall survival and disease-free survival were not significantly different. Toxicity was mild. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, postoperative adjuvant treatment with edrecolomab in patients with resected stage II colon cancer did not improve overall or disease-free survival.     

Improved survival and complete response rates in patients with advanced melanoma treated with concurrent ipilimumab and radiotherapy versus ipilimumab alone

There is a growing body of evidence supporting the synergistic roles of radiotherapy and immunotherapy in the treatment of malignancy. Published case studies of the abscopal effect have been reported with the use of ipilimumab and radiotherapy in metastatic melanoma, but evidence supporting the routine use of this combination of therapy is limited. We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate patients treated with ipilimumab for advanced melanoma at a single institution from May 2011 to June 2015. Patients were grouped into those who had received concurrent radiotherapy while on ipilimumab (Ipi-RT), and those who did not. We then evaluated the treatment response following completion of ipilimumab. A total of 101 patients received ipilimumab in the prespecified time frame. 70 received Ipi-RT and 31 received ipilimumab without concurrent radiotherapy. Median overall survival (OS) was significantly increased in the concurrent Ipi-RT arm at 19 months vs. 10 months for ipilimumab alone (p = 0.01). Median progression free survival (PFS) was marginally increased in the Ipi-RT group compare with the ipilimumab alone group (5 months vs. 3 months, p = 0.20). Rates of complete response (CR) were significantly increased in the Ipi-RT group vs. ipilimumab alone (25.7% vs. 6.5%; p = 0.04), and rates of overall response (OR) in the groups were 37.1% vs. 19.4% (p = 0.11). No increase in toxicities was observed in the Ipi-RT group compare with ipilimumab alone. Prospective trials are needed to further clarify the role of radiotherapy with ipilimumab, but these encouraging preliminary observations suggest that this combination can induce more durable responses to immunotherapy.