Wear and acetabular component orientation in third generation alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings: an analysis of 33 retrievals [corrected

We studied 33 third generation, alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings retrieved from cementless total hip replacements after more than six months in situ. Wear volume was measured with a Roundtest machine, and acetabular orientation from the anteroposterior pelvic radiograph. The overall median early wear rate was 0.1 mm(3)/yr for the femoral heads, and 0.04 mm(3)/yr for the acetabular liners. We then excluded hips where the components had migrated. In this stable subgroup of 22 bearings, those with an acetabular anteversion of < 15 degrees (seven femoral heads) had a median femoral head wear rate of 1.2 mm(3)/yr, compared with 0 mm(3)/yr for those with an anteversion of > or =15 degrees (15 femoral heads, p < 0.001). Even under edge loading, wear volumes with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings are small in comparison to other bearing materials. Low acetabular anteversion is associated with greater wear.     

A Mid-Term Analysis Suggests Ceramic on Ceramic Hip Arthroplasty Is Durable with Minimal Wear and Low Risk of Squeak

Background

The incidence of hip replacements in the younger patient is ever increasing. With this in mind, improving the longevity of hip arthroplasties is paramount. Alumina ceramic is a promising bearing surface due to its low wear rate and biological inertness.

Purpose

This study aims to review our experience with ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty, reporting on the need for revision as well as the cause of failure. Our secondary purpose is to review our experience with the phenomenon of squeaking analysing and its effect on clinical outcome with specific emphasis on component positioning. Also reported are the results of our retrieval analysis of explanted components documenting the wear rate and our analysis of strip wear.

Methods

A consecutive series of 301 primary cementless alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasties at a minimum of 10 years follow-up was reviewed. These arthroplasties all had third-generation ceramic-on-ceramic bearings performed through a posterior approach with repair of capsule and external rotators to bone. We analysed hips both clinically and radiographically. Analysis of wear in 62 ceramic bearings was performed using a Roundtest RA300 machine (Mitutoyo; Andover, UK), which has an accuracy of 0.01 μm.

Results

Overall, the survival rate of the implants was 98% at 10 years. No ceramic fractures were encountered in this study. Seventy-four patients reported squeaking hips, and two cases were revised due to squeaking (0.6%). No failures were related to bearing wear.

Conclusions

We believe that ceramic-on-ceramic is a safe bearing coupling with excellent survivorship at 10 years.     

Wear in alumina-on-alumina ceramic total hip replacements: a retrieval analysis of edge loading

We analysed 54 alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings from total hip replacements retrieved at one centre after a mean duration of 3.5 years (0.2 to 10.6) in situ. These implants were obtained from 54 patients (16 men and 38 women) with a mean age of 67 years (33 to 88) who underwent revision for a variety of reasons. Posterior edge loading was found in the majority of these retrievals (32 out of 54). Anterosuperior edge loading occurred less often but produced a higher rate of wear. Stripe wear on the femoral heads had a median volumetric wear rate of 0.2 mm(3)/year (0 to 7.2). The wear volume on the femoral heads corresponded to the width of edge wear on the matching liner. Anteversion of the acetabular component was found to be a more important determinant than inclination for wear in ceramic bearings. Posterior edge loading may be considered to be a normal occurrence in ceramic-on-ceramic bearings, with minimal clinical consequences. Edge loading should be defined as either anterosuperior or posterior, as each edge loading mechanism may result in different clinical implications.     

Can Squeaking With Ceramic-On-Ceramic Hip Articulations In Total Hip Arthroplasty Be Avoided?

Squeaking is a recognized complication of total hip arthroplasty with ceramic on ceramic bearings but the etiology has not been well identified. We evaluated 183 hips in 148 patients who had undergone ceramic-on-ceramic noncemented total hip arthroplasties at one center between 1997–2007 by standardized telephone interviews and radiographic review. Audible squeaking was reported from 22 hips (12% of 183) of 19 patients. Prevalence of squeaking was associated with younger age; obesity; lateralized cup position; use of beta titanium alloy femoral components and shortened head length options; and higher reported activity level, greater pain, and decreased satisfaction at the time of the interview. Squeaking was described as having little personal significance by most patients. Squeaking might be preventable in part through medialization of the acetabular cup and avoidance of the use of shortened femoral necks.     

Squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic hips: the importance of acetabular component orientation

Audible squeaking in total hip replacements with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings is a rare problem. Acetabular component orientation was compared for 17 squeaking hips and 17 matched controls. Ninety-four percent of control hips were in a range of 25 degrees +/- 10 degrees anteversion and 45 degrees +/- 10 degrees inclination, but only 35% of squeaking hips were in this range (P = .0003). Eight hips squeak with bending. Four hips squeak with walking, and 5 hips squeak after prolonged periods of walking. Hips that squeaked with walking had acetabular components that were more anteverted (40 degrees ) than hips that squeaked with bending (19 degrees ) (P = .001) or prolonged walking (18 degrees ) (P = .020). The hips started squeaking after an average of 14 months. Patients with squeaking hips were younger, heavier, and taller than patients with silent hips.     

Mid-term result of ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate our clinical experience with ceramic-on-ceramic cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) and complications after an average follow-up of more than eight years.

Methods

From January 2001 to December 2008, 540 THA with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings were performed in 448 patients (92 bilateral, 54 of which were operated simultaneously) with a mean age 49.9 years (range 18–84) by a senior surgeon. Pre-operative aetiological reasons were developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in 205 hips, degenerative arthritis in 157 hips, avascular necrosis in 51 hips, rheumatoid diseases in 40 hips, posttraumatic arthritis in 40 hips, other reasons in 25 hips and revision surgery in 22 hips. Patients were evaluated with Harris hip score (HSS), and radiological findings of acetabular and femoral component loosening or osteolysis with ceramic bearing related complications like squeaking, liner and head fractures were recorded.

Result

The average duration of follow-up time was 8.2 years (range, five to 13.2). The main Harris hip score increased from 42.4 points preoperatively to 94.9 points at the time of last follow-up. We had one fracture of the ceramic head, 11 clicking and four squeaking; one of them was revised because of terrible squeaking due to acetabular liner fracture, the other three were seldom audible from the outside and followed conservatively. We did not observed loosening or osteolysis due to ceramic bearings at the time of the final follow-up.

Conclusion

Our study has demonstrated that ceramic-on-ceramic bearings can be used safely in different etiological problems. Incidences of noisy hips are becoming less frequent.     

The role of patient factors and implant position in squeaking of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacements

We investigated factors that were thought to be associated with an increased incidence of squeaking of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacements. Between June 1997 and December 2008 the three senior authors implanted 2406 primary total hip replacements with a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surface. The mean follow-up was 10.6 years. The diagnosis was primary osteoarthritis in each case, and no patient had undergone previous surgery to the hip. We identified 74 squeaking hips (73 patients) giving an incidence of 3.1% at a mean follow-up of 9.5 years (4.1 to 13.3). Taller, heavier and younger patients were significantly more likely to have hips that squeaked. Squeaking hips had a significantly higher range of post-operative internal (p = 0.001) and external rotation (p = 0.003) compared with silent hips. Patients with squeaking hips had significantly higher activity levels (p = 0.009). A squeaking hip was not associated with a significant difference in patient satisfaction (p = 0.24) or Harris hip score (p = 0.34). Four implant position factors enabled good prediction of squeaking. These were high acetabular component inclination, high femoral offset, lateralisation of the hip centre and either high or low acetabular component anteversion. This is the largest study to date to examine patient factors and implant position factors that predispose to squeaking of a ceramic-on-ceramic hip. The results suggest that factors which increase the mechanical forces across the hip joint and factors which increase the risk of neck-to-rim impingement, and therefore edge-loading, are those that predispose to squeaking.     

Primary Ceramic-on-ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a 32-mm Ceramic Head With a Titanium-alloy Sleeve

Background

Modern ceramic-on-ceramic bearings have become attractive alternatives to conventional polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty (THA) as a result of their low wear and minimal particle production. However, 28-mm heads in ceramic-on-ceramic bearing couples have been associated with ceramic fracture. To address these issues, 32-mm and larger ceramic heads with a titanium-alloy sleeve have been introduced, although limited data are available on their durability and clinical outcomes.

Questions/purposes

We determined (1) the survivorship of the primary ceramic-on-ceramic THA using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve at a minimum followup of 5 years; (2) Harris hip scores; (3) the incidence of ceramic fracture and noisy hip; and (4) the proportion of hips showing radiographic evidence of osteolysis.

Methods

From November 2005 to August 2009, we performed 301 ceramic-on-ceramic THAs using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve in 270 patients. Of these, 12 patients (12 hips [4%]) died from problems unrelated to surgery and 13 patients (15 hips [5%]) were lost during followup before a minimum of 5 years had been reached, leaving 245 patients who had 274 THAs with a minimum followup of 5 years (mean, 6.5 years; range, 5–9 years) in this retrospective analysis. During the study period, 30% (301 of 997 hips) were performed with this articulation based on the operating surgeon’s discretion. The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 55 years (range, 16–82 years). All operations were performed at a single center. All of the ceramic implants were hot isostatic-pressed, laser-marked, proof-tested third-generation alumina. We determined the implant survival, Harris hip scores, incidence of ceramic fracture or noisy hips (based on a questionnaire), and presence of osteolysis.

Results

The survival rate of ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in primary THA using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve was 98% (95% confidence interval, 96%–100%) at 9 years. The Harris hip score improved from a mean of 47 points preoperatively to 93 points at last followup. One ceramic head fractured at 6 years postoperatively. No ceramic liners fractured. Audible hip clicking and squeaking were identified in four hips and one hip, respectively. Osteolysis was detected in three hips, but none had symptoms.

Conclusions

Primary ceramic-on-ceramic THA using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve has a survivorship of 98% at 9-year followup. Nevertheless, surgeons should be aware of the potential risks of ceramic fracture, noise, and osteolysis associated with the use of a ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study.     

Review on squeaking hips

Squeaking is a well-recognized complication for hard-on-hard bearings. The nature of squeaking is not yet completely understood however it is considered a multifactorial phenomenon. Patient, implant, and surgical factors play a role in squeaking. It is believed that mechanisms damaging the fluid film lubrication in which these bearings function optimally have a critical role. Such mechanisms include edge loading, stripe wear, impingement, third body particles and ceramic fracture. The resonance of metallic parts can produce noise in the human audible range hence the implant metallurgic composition and design may play a role. Implant positioning can facilitate impingement and edge loading enhancing the occurrence of squeaking. The recent introduction of large heads (> 36 mm) 4^th generation ceramic-on-ceramic bearing may accentuate the conditions facilitating noise formation; however the current literature is insufficient. Clinically, squeaking may manifest in extreme hip positions or during normal gait cycle however it is rarely associated with pain. Evaluations of patients with squeaking include clinical and radiographic assessments. Computer tomography is recommended as it can better reveal ceramic breakage and implant malposition. The treatments for most squeaking patients include reassurance and activity modification. However for some, noise can be a problem, requiring further surgical intervention. In the occurrence of ceramic fracture, implant failure, extreme components malposition, instability and impingement, surgery should be advised. This review will aim to discuss the current literature regarding squeaking.     

Edge loading in third generation alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings: stripe wear

Alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings perform exceptionally well under standard hip simulator conditions, but in vivo some retrieved bearings have shown an unusual stripe pattern of wear. We studied 16 bearings retrieved from a series of 1,588 cementless hip arthroplasties with third generation alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings to characterize the mechanism of stripe wear formation. None of these bearings were retrieved for bearing failure. The average wear volume was 0.4 mm(3) per year in the heads and 0.3 mm(3) per year in the liners. Mapping of wear stripes on the heads and liners showed that the majority do not occur with normal walking; instead they probably occur with edge loading when the hip is flexed, such as with rising from a chair or with climbing a high step.     

Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: A new standard—Affirms

Highly cross-linked polyethylene has emerged as an improvement over conventional polyethylene in terms of wear characteristics and osteolysis in total hip replacement; however, decreased material properties could make it unsuitable for use in high-demand patients. Modern ceramic-on-ceramic bearings display extremely low wear and durability that make them an ideal bearing surface. Unfortunately, certain implant designs have been associated with squeaking, which has discouraged widespread use. Proper implant selection, orientation, and surgical technique can lead to optimal results with ceramic bearings, and substantial mid- to long-term data exists to support their use over other bearing surfaces in total hip replacement.     

Squeaking as a cause for revision of a composite ceramic cup

Squeaking in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been observed only in hard-on-hard bearings, such as ceramic-on-ceramic or metal-on-metal. We report the case of a patient with a squeaking THA who had undergone multiple femoral head revisions combined with a composite ceramic cup (polyurethane, ceramic). Squeaking started 6 years postoperatively and acetabular revision was necessary to resolve the issue. Secondary deformation of the inlay resulted in clamping of the femoral head and increased friction. This should be considered when assessing and advising patients with squeaking THA when composite ceramic components are involved.     

Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty: Minimum of Six-Year Follow-up Study

Background

This study examines the clinical and radiologic results of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasties with regard to wear, osteolysis, and fracture of the ceramic after a minimum follow-up of six years.

Methods

We evaluated the results of a consecutive series of 148 primary ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasties that had been performed between May 2001 and October 2005 in 142 patients. The mean age was 57.2 years (range, 23 to 81 years). The mean follow-up period was 7.8 years (range, 6.1 to 10.1 years). Preoperative diagnosis was avascular necrosis in 77 hips (52%), degenerative arthritis in 36 hips (24.3%), femur neck fracture in 18 hips (12.2%), rheumatoid arthritis in 15 hips (10.1%), and septic hip sequelae in 2 hips (1.4%). Clinical results were evaluated with the Harris hip score, and the presence of postoperative groin or thigh pain. Radiologic analysis was done with special attention in terms of wear, periprosthetic osteolysis, and ceramic failures.

Results

The mean Harris hip score improved from 58.3 (range, 10 to 73) to 92.5 (range, 79 to 100) on the latest follow-up evaluation. At final follow-up, groin pain was found in 4 hips (2.7%), and thigh pain was found in 6 hips (4.1%). Radiologically, all femoral stems demonstrated stable fixations without loosening. Radiolucent lines were observed around the stem in 25 hips (16.9%), and around the cup in 4 hips (2.7%). Endosteal new bone formation was observed around the stem in 95 hips (64.2%) and around the cup in 88 hips (59.5%). No osteolysis was observed around the stem and cup. There were 2 hips (1.4%) of inclination changes of acetabular cup, 2 hips (1.4%) of hip dislocation, 1 hip (0.7%) of ceramic head fracture, and 1 hip (0.7%) of squeaking. The Kaplan-Meier survival rate of the prostheses was 98.1% at postoperative 7.8 years.

Conclusions

The ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty produced excellent clinical results and implant survival rates with no detectable osteolysis on a minimum six-year follow-up study. The ceramic-on-ceramic couplings could be a reasonable option of primary total hip arthroplasty for variable indications.     

Wear rates of ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces in total hip implants: a 12-year follow-up study.

A retrospective clinical and radiographic analysis was performed on 58 patients (60 hips; mean age at time of surgery, 45.2 years) at a minimum of 10-year follow-up (mean, 12.7 years) after total hip replacement using a ceramic-on-ceramic hearing total hip implant (Autophor, Smith and Nephew, Memphis, TN). Mean wear rate at final follow-up was 0.21 mim, averaging 0.016 mm/y. There were no cases of periprosthetic osteolysis in the acetabuulum or femur. For the unrevised components, there were 3 (5%) cases of protrusio acetabuli and 4 (7%) cases of acetabular component loosening. On the femoral side, 78.3% had distal pedestal formation, and 83% had greater than 2 mm implant-bone radiolucencies in more than 5 Gruen zones as a result of gross motion of the stem. Despite radiographic evidence of implant loosening, this hard bearing articulation functioned well in vivo for more than 12 years with remarkably low wear--approximately one tenth the rate reported for metal-on-polyethylene total hip bearings.     

The 2009 Frank Stinchfield Award: “Hip Squeaking”: <Emphasis Type="Italic">A Biomechanical Study of Ceramic-on-ceramic Bearing Surfaces</Emphasis>

We designed and implemented an in vitro bench test to simulate and identify potential biomechanical causes for hip squeaking with alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces. All bearings were third-generation alumina ceramic with a 32-mm head coupled with a 56-mm acetabular component with a 32-mm ceramic insert. Conditions for testing were normal gait, high load, stripe wear, stripe wear in extreme load, metal transfer, edge wear with extreme load, and microfracture. Each condition was tested two times in dry conditions and two times in a lubricated condition with 25% bovine serum. Squeaking was reproduced in all dry conditions. It occurred quickly with high load, stripe wear, or metal transfer. Once squeaking occurred, it did not stop. Squeaking disappeared for all conditions when a small amount of lubricant was introduced. In lubricated conditions, squeaking was only reproduced for the material transfer condition. Our observations suggest squeaking is a problem of ceramic-ceramic lubrication and that this noise occurs when the film fluid between two surfaces is disrupted. Material (metal) transfer was the only condition that led to squeaking in a lubricated situation.     

High Incidence of Squeaking in THAs with Alumina Ceramic-on-ceramic Bearings

Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in THA are a popular alternative to overcome wear concerns in traditional metal-polyethylene bearings. However, squeaking is a potentially worrisome phenomenon in ceramic-on-ceramic THAs which we observed in some of our patients. We reviewed all 42 patients who underwent 43 ceramic-on-ceramic noncemented THAs during the time of the study. Squeaking, defined as a reproducible sound of squeaking, clicking, or grating, occurred in nine of 43 implants (20.9%). Standard radiographs were normal. We used CT imaging to determine cup anteversion and inclination angles, comparing the squeaking hips with those of a randomly selected control group, but found no differences. We then hypothesized specific design features (stem size, cup size, head size, and neck length of the head) would be risk factors for squeaking. We found a difference in neck length between squeaking and nonsqueaking implants. A neck length of −4 mm or shorter resulted in a relative risk of 5.56 (95% confidence interval, 1.14–27.01) for squeaking. We found a high incidence of squeaking in our population, and we believe this phenomenon is an underreported side effect of these types of bearings. A short neck length of the femoral implant was a risk factor for squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic THA. Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved or waived approval for the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.     

A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing three alternative bearing surfaces in primary total hip replacement

The ideal bearing surface for young patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) remains controversial. We report the five-year results of a randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes of 102 THRs in 91 patients who were 相似文献   

Reduction of osteolysis with use of Marathon cross-linked polyethylene. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of five years, of a previous report

We previously reported wear data at a minimum of two years following thirty-four total hip replacements with a Marathon cross-linked polyethylene liner and twenty-four replacements with a conventional (gamma-sterilized-in-air) Enduron polyethylene liner. In this current study, with sequential five-year radiographs, wear rates were determined with use of linear regression analysis. The Marathon polyethylene had average wear rates of 15.4 mm(3)/yr and 8.0 mm(3)/million cycles. The Enduron polyethylene had average wear rates of 55.5 mm(3)/yr and 29.9 mm(3)/million cycles. The adjusted volumetric wear rate of the Marathon polyethylene was 73% lower than that of the Enduron polyethylene (p = 0.001). Osteolysis developed in eight of the twenty-four hips with an Enduron liner but was not apparent in any hip with a Marathon liner.