The severity of airways obstruction as a determinant of treatment response in COPD

Guidelines recommend that patients with COPD are stratified arbitrarily by baseline severity (FEV₁) to decide when to initiate combination treatment with a long-acting β₂-agonist and an inhaled corticosteroid. Assessment of baseline FEV₁ as a continuous variable may provide a more reliable prediction of treatment effects. Patients from a 1-year, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial comparing 50 μg salmeterol (Sal), 500 μg fluticasone propionate (FP), the combination (Sal/FP) and placebo, (bid), were categorized post hoc into FEV₁ <50% and FEV₁ ≥50% predicted subgroups (n=949/513 respectively). Treatment effects on clinical outcomes – lung function, exacerbations, health status, diary card symptoms, and adverse events – were investigated. Treatment responses based on a pre-specified analysis explored treatment differences by severity as a continuous variable. Lung function improved with active treatment irrespective of FEV₁; Sal/FP had greatest effect. This improvement appeared additive in milder disease; synergistic in severe disease. Active therapy significantly reduced exacerbation rate in patients with FEV₁ <50% predicted, not in milder disease. Health status and breathlessness improved with Sal/FP irrespective of baseline FEV₁; adverse events were similar across subgroups. The spirometric response to Sal/FP varied with baseline FEV₁, and clinical benefits were not restricted to patients with severe disease. These data have implications for COPD management decisions, suggesting that arbitrary stratifications of baseline severity are not necessarily indicative of treatment efficacy and that the benefits of assessing baseline severity as a continuous variable should be assessed in future trials.     

The role of combination therapy with corticosteroids and long-acting ��2-agonists in the prevention of exacerbations in COPD

Acute exacerbations of COPD can complicate the course of the disease in patients with severe airway obstruction. Reduction of exacerbations is an important clinical outcome in evaluating new therapies in COPD. Combination therapies with long-acting β-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids have now been approved for use. Three 1-year randomized clinical trials, which studied the effect of combining a long-acting β₂-agonist with an inhaled corticosteroid in COPD, documented that exacerbation frequency was lower with therapy than placebo. Combination therapy had a similar effect to its monocomponents in the trial evaluating salmeterol/fluticasone combination. However, when patients with more severe COPD were studied using a combination of budesonide and formoterol, a clear improvement was seen in the overall exacerbation rates compared with the use of a long-acting β₂-agonist alone.     

Budesonide�Cformoterol (inhalation powder) in the treatment of COPD

The budesonide–formoterol dry powder inhaler (Symbicort^® Turbuhaler^® 160/4.5–640/18 μg/day) contains the long-acting β₂-adrenoreceptor agonist formoterol and the inhaled corticosteroid budesonide. Two large, 12-month trials examined the effect of budesonide–formoterol 160/4.5 μg twice daily in COPD patients who met these criteria. The studies were identical, except one in which the patients had received oral prednisolone 30 mg/day and had inhaled formoterol 4.5 μg twice daily for 2 weeks before randomization. In terms of the FEV₁, budesonide–formoterol produced an effect greater than that of both budesonide alone and formoterol alone reported in previous studies. The combination was generally more effective than either of the components in terms of peak expiratory flow, symptoms, and exacerbations. These advantages of the combination over those of either budesonide alone or formoterol alone were quite consistent. Improving lung function and decreasing symptoms significantly, budesonide–formoterol combination therapy provides significant clinical improvements in COPD, despite the limited reversibility of impaired lung function in the disease.     

Effect of add-on therapy of tiotropium in COPD treated with theophylline

Background

Although combination therapy with bronchodilators is recommended for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), there is insufficient evidence for the efficacy of some combinations of long-acting bronchodilators.

Objective

We investigated the effects of a combination therapy with tiotropium and theophylline in COPD patients.

Methods

In a 12-week, open-labeled, parallel-group randomized study, pulmonary functions and dyspnea scores were compared between the combination and theophylline alone therapy at baseline, and 4 and 8 weeks after randomization in COPD.

Results

Sixty-one COPD patients completed the trial (31 combination therapy, 30 theophylline alone; mean age 70 years; 58 males; mean dyspnea score 2.0 and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) 1.5 L [62.5% predicted]). FEV₁ in the combination group, but not in the theophylline alone, was significantly increased at 4 (1.56 ± 0.13 L, p < 0.001) and 8 weeks (1.60 ± 0.13 L, p < 0.001) from the baseline (1.40 ± 0.12 L). In the combination group, but not the theophylline alone group, the dyspnea score was significantly improved after 4 (p < 0.01) and 8 weeks (p < 0.05) compared with baseline. In 17 patients who did not receive theophylline at screening, treatment with 4 or 8 weeks of theophylline alone did not improve dyspnea score or FEV₁.

Conclusion

Addition of tiotropium therapy to theophylline treatment can improve dyspnea and pulmonary function in COPD. Although this study did not assess whether there was any benefit of adding theophylline to patients treated with tiotropium, tiotropium can be a useful addition in COPD already treated with theophylline.     

Modifying the Course of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Looking Beyond the FEV1

Abstract

COPD is defined by airflow limitation that is not fully reversible and is usually progressive. Thus, airflow obstruction (measured as FEV₁) has traditionally been used as the benchmark defining disease modification with therapy. However, COPD exacerbations and extrapulmonary effects are common and burdensome and generally become more prominent as the disease progresses. Therefore, disease progression should be broader than FEV₁ alone. Interventions that reduce the frequency or severity of exacerbations or ameliorate extrapulmonary effects should also be considered disease modifiers. A narrow focus on FEV₁ will fail to capture all the beneficial effects of therapy on disease modification. Although smoking cessation has been unequivocally demonstrated to slow the rate of FEV₁ decline, inhaled corticosteroid–long-acting bronchodilator therapy may also have modest effects according to post hoc analysis. Maintenance pharmacotherapy with inhaled long-acting anti-muscarinic or ®-adrenergic agents or combined ®-adrenergic—inhaled corticosteroid reduces symptoms, improves lung function, reduces the frequency of exacerbations, and improves exercise capacity and HRQL. Pulmonary rehabilitation reduces symptom burden, increases exercise capacity, improves HRQL, and reduces health care utilization, probably through reducing the severity of exacerbations. Smoking cessation, lung volume reduction surgery, inhaled maintenance pharmacotherapy, and pulmonary rehabilitation administered in the post-exacerbation period may reduce mortality in COPD. These improvements over multiple outcome areas and over relatively long durations suggest that disease modification is indeed possible with existing therapies for COPD. Therefore, therapeutic nihilism in COPD is no longer warranted.     

Comparison of three combined pharmacological approaches with tiotropium monotherapy in stable moderate to severe COPD: a systematic review

BackgroundGuidelines recommend the use of inhaled long-acting bronchodilators, inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and their combinations for maintenance treatment of moderate to severe COPD. However, there are limited data supporting combination therapy.MethodsThis systematic review assessed the efficacy of three therapeutic approaches: tiotropium plus long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) (“dual” therapy), LABA/ICS (“combined” therapy), and tiotropium plus LABA/ICS (“triple” therapy), all compared with tiotropium monotherapy. Randomized controlled trials were identified after a search of different databases of published and unpublished trials.ResultsTwenty trials (6803 participants) were included. “Dual” therapy showed significant improvements in forced volume in the first second (FEV₁), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and dyspnea. However, it failed to reduce the risk of COPD exacerbations. Compared with tiotropium, “combined” therapy presented modest but significant effects on FEV₁, HRQoL, and dyspnea. Again, there was no significant difference in exacerbations, but it was associated with a significant increase of serious adverse effects (SAE) (number need to treat for harm [NNTH] = 20; 95% CI: 11–119). Finally, “triple therapy” increased FEV₁, improved HRQoL (both benefits exceeded minimal important differences) and decrease COPD exacerbations in anon-significant way. (Odds ratio [OR] = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.24 to 1.37, p = 0.21).Conclusions“Dual” and “triple” therapy seem like the most promising for patients with moderate to very severe COPD. However, data are still scarce and studies too short to generate a strong recommendation. Future studies should examine long-term efficacy and safety.     

Comparison and optimal use of fixed combinations in the management of COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Indications for the use of long-acting β₂-agonists (LABAs) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in patients with COPD are described in the various international guidelines, but no special recommendations are made concerning the use of combination inhalers containing a LABA as well as an ICS. To determine the place of combination inhalers in the treatment of COPD we reviewed recent literature concerning this subject. On molecular level ICS/LABA combination therapy has anti-inflammatory properties which cannot be attributed to ICS alone. All clinical studies indicate that the two available combinations (salmeterol/fluticasone and formoterol/budesonide) significantly reduce exacerbation rate of moderate/severe exacerbations when compared with placebo. Some studies also showed a significant reduction in exacerbation rate compared with LABA monotherapy, but not compared with ICS monotherapy. From the patient’s perspective, ICS/LABA combination inhalers are the first choice when both need to be prescribed, possibly improving patient compliance for ICS. Currently little evidence is available to predict if flexible treatment with LABA/ICS combination inhalers will improve disease control in COPD. Further studies are needed to elucidate the clinical benefit of combination inhalers versus the individual components in different inhalers, and to investigate the clinical benefit of flexible dosing of combination inhalers in patients with COPD.     

The scientific rationale for combining long-acting β2-agonists and muscarinic antagonists in COPD

Bronchodilators are the cornerstone of pharmacological management of COPD. For patients whose conditions are not sufficiently controlled by monotherapy, combining bronchodilators of different classes, in particular an inhaled muscarinic antagonist with an inhaled β₂-agonist, seems a convenient way of delivering treatment and obtaining superior results. When administered as combination therapy, short-acting bronchodilators provide superior bronchodilation compared with individual agents given alone. More recently, long-acting β₂-agonists (LABAs) and muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) have been introduced, and current guidelines recommend regular use of these agents alone or as concurrent therapy in COPD to maximize bronchodilation. In particular, the combination of a LABA plus LAMA seems to play an important role. This article illustrates the scientific rationale for combining LABAs and LAMAs in COPD, reviews the clinical evidence to support these agents given in combination, and discusses their potential role in the management of patients with COPD.     

Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium Added to Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol in Patients with COPD: Results of Two Randomized, ­Double-Blind Studies

Combinations of drugs with distinct and complementary mechanisms of action may offer improved efficacy in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In two 12-week, double-blind, parallel-group studies, patients with COPD were randomized 1:1:1 to once-daily umeclidinium (UMEC; 62.5 μg and 125 μg) or placebo (PBO), added to twice-daily fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL; 250/50 μg). In both studies, the primary efficacy measure was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) at Day 85. Secondary endpoints were weighted-mean (WM) FEV₁ over 0–6 hours post-dose (Day 84) and rescue albuterol use. Health-related quality of life outcomes (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ] and COPD assessment test [CAT]) were also examined. Safety was assessed throughout. Both UMEC+FP/SAL doses provided statistically significant improvements in trough FEV₁ (Day 85: 0.127–0.148 L) versus PBO+FP/SAL. Similarly, both UMEC+FP/SAL doses provided statistically-significant improvements in 0–6 hours post-dose WM FEV₁ versus PBO+FP/SAL (Day 84: 0.144–0.165 L). Rescue use over Weeks 1–12 decreased with UMEC+FP/SAL in both studies versus PBO+FP/SAL (Study 1, 0.3 puffs/day [both doses]; Study 2, 0.5 puffs/day [UMEC 125+FP/SAL]). Decreases from baseline in CAT score were generally larger for both doses of UMEC+FP/SAL versus PBO+FP/SAL (except for Day 84 Study 2). In Study 1, no differences in SGRQ score were observed between UMEC+FP/SAL and PBO+FP/SAL; however, in Study 2, statistically significant improvements were observed with UMEC 62.5+FP/SAL (Day 28) and UMEC 125+FP/SAL (Days 28 and 84) versus PBO+FP/SAL. The incidence of on-treatment adverse events across all treatment groups was 37–41% in Study 1 and 36–38% in Study 2. Overall, these data indicate that the combination of UMEC+FP/SAL can provide additional benefits over FP/SAL alone in patients with COPD.     

COPD Exacerbation Frequency,Pharmacotherapy and Resource Use: An Observational Study in UK Primary Care

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) management represents a significant health resource use burden. Understanding of current resource use, treatment strategies and outcomes can improve future COPD management, for patient benefit and to aid efficient service delivery. This study aimed to describe exacerbation frequency, pharmacotherapy and health resource use in COPD management in routine UK primary care. A retrospective, observational study using routine clinical records of 511 patients with COPD, was undertaken in 10 General Practices in England. Up to 3 years’ patient data were collected and analysed. 75% (234/314) patients with mild-moderate COPD (≥50% predicted FEV₁) received inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). 11% of patients (54/511) received ICS monotherapy. Mean (standard deviation) annual exacerbation frequency was 1.1 (1.2) in mild-moderate, 1.7 (1.6) in severe (30–49% predicted FEV₁) and 2.2 (2.0) in very severe (<30% predicted FEV₁) COPD. 14% patients (69/511) had a mean exacerbation frequency of ≥3/year (‘frequent-exacerbators’); 9% (27/314) of patients with mild-moderate, 19% (27/145) with severe and 29% (15/52) with very severe COPD. 14% (10/69) of frequent-exacerbators failed to receive inhaled long-acting beta agonists (LABA), 25% (17/69) inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA), and 12% (`/69) ICS. Frequent-exacerbators had a median of 6.67 primary care contacts/year, 1.0 secondary care visits/year and 21% were hospitalised for COPD/year. Inhaled therapy was frequently inappropriate, with over-use of ICS in patients with mild-moderate COPD. COPD exacerbations were associated with high health resource use and occurred at all levels of disease severity. COPD management strategies should encompass risk-stratification for both exacerbation frequency and physiological impairment.     

Emergency Hospital Care for Exacerbation of COPD: Is Inhaled Maintenance Therapy Modified?

Background: The impact of hospital emergency care and inward admission for acute exacerbations of COPD on inhaled maintenance treatment is not well known. Objective: Therefore, we evaluated the impact of short-stay emergency hospital care and inward admission for acute exacerbation of COPD (eCOPD) on inhaled maintenance treatment prescribed at discharge. Design: Prospective observational cohort study of patients presenting with eCOPD at emergency departments in 16 hospitals of the Spanish healthcare system. The ethics committee at each hospital approved the study and patients provided an informed consent before inclusion. We classified the patients according to the severity of COPD: mild/moderate (FEV₁ ≥ 50% predicted) or severe/very severe (FEV₁ < 50% predicted) and need of inward hospitalisation. We analysed changes to maintenance treatment on discharge according to GOLD strategy. Results: 1559 patients, 65% required hospitalisation. The most common maintenance treatment was inhaled corticoids (ICS) (80.9%) followed by long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) (75.4%). The most common combination was triple therapy (LABA+ LAMA+ICS) (56.2%) followed by LABA+ICS dual therapy (18.2%) regardless of the severity of COPD. In more than 60% of patients treatment was not changed at discharge. The most common change in treatment was a reduction when discharge was from emergency care and an increase after hospitalisation (-21.6% and +19.5% in severe/very severe COPD, respectively). Conclusions: Emergency hospital care for eCOPD does not usually induce changes in inhaled maintenance treatment for COPD regardless of the duration of the hospital stay.     

Triple versus LAMA/LABA combination therapy for Japanese patients with COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundIn symptomatic COPD patients with a history of exacerbations, additional treatment with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) to long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) combination therapy is recommended based on the evidence of low incidence of exacerbations but with a caution for pneumonia. However, ethnic differences may affect the response to drugs. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this treatment in the Japanese population (PROSPERO: CRD42020191978).MethodsWe searched relevant randomized control trials and analyzed the exacerbations, quality of life, lung function, and adverse events including pneumonia and mortality as the outcomes of interest.ResultsWe identified a total of three RCTs (N = 632). Treatment with ICS/LAMA/LABA triple therapy significantly decreased the exacerbations (rate ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.85) and improved the trough FEV₁ (mean difference, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.07) compared to LAMA/LABA therapy. However, triple therapy showed a significantly higher incidence of pneumonia compared to LAMA/LABA (odds ratio, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.58 to 7.22). Concerning other adverse events including mortality, there were no significant difference between these therapies.ConclusionsIn the current meta-analysis of the Japanese population, we confirmed that triple therapy causes a higher incidence of pneumonia than LAMA/LABA treatment but is a more preferable treatment since it showed a lower incidence of exacerbations and higher trough FEV₁ in patients with symptomatic moderate to severe COPD. However, since the sample sizes were not statistically large enough, further trials involving Japanese patients are needed.     

Systemic inflammation after inspiratory loading in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Objective

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) present systemic inflammation. Strenuous resistive breathing induces systemic inflammation in healthy subjects. We hypothesized that the increased respiratory load that characterizes COPD can contribute to systemic inflammation in these patients.

Patients and methods

To test this hypothesis, we compared leukocyte numbers and levels of circulating cytokines (tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNFα], interleukin-1β [IL-1β], IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10), before and 1 hour after maximal incremental inspiratory loading in 13 patients with stable COPD (forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV₁] 29 ± 2.5% ref) and in 8 healthy sedentary subjects (FEV₁ 98 ± 5% ref).

Results

We found that: (1) at baseline, patients with COPD showed higher leukocyte counts and IL-8 levels than controls (p < 0.01); and, (2) one hour after maximal inspiratory loading these values were unchanged, except for IL-10, which increased in controls (p < 0.05) but not in patients with COPD.

Conclusions

This study confirms the presence of systemic inflammation in COPD, shows that maximal inspiratory loading does not increase the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-8) in COPD patients or controls, but suggests that the former may be unable to mount an appropriate systemic anti-inflammatory response to exercise.     

Formoterol in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Bronchodilators represent the hallmark of symptomatic treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). There are four categories of bronchodilators: anticholinergics, methylxanthines, short-acting β₂-agonists, and long-acting β₂-agonists such as formoterol. Significant research has been performed to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of formoterol in the therapeutic field of COPD. Formoterol exhibits a rapid onset of bronchodilation similar to that observed with salbutamol, yet its long bronchodilatory duration is comparable to salmeterol. In addition, formoterol presents with a clear superiority in lung function improvement compared with either ipratropium bromide or oral theophylline, while its efficacy improves when administered in combination with ipratropium. Formoterol has been shown to better reduce dynamic hyperinflation, which is responsible for exercise intolerance and dyspnea in COPD patients, compared with other bronchodilators, whereas it exerts synergistic effect with tiotropium. Moreover, formoterol reduces exacerbations, increases days free of use of rescue medication and improves patients’ quality of life and disease symptoms. Formoterol has a favorable safety profile and is better tolerated than theophylline. Collectively, data extracted from multicenter clinical trials support formoterol as a valid therapeutic option in the treatment of COPD.     

Tolerability Profiles of Leukotriene Receptor Antagonists and Long-Acting β2-Adrenoceptor Agonists in Combination with Inhaled Corticosteroids for Treatment of Asthma: A Review

Inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting β₂-adrenoceptor agonists, and leukotriene receptor antagonists are widely used for treatment of asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids are recommended as first-line therapy, whereas long-acting β₂-adrenoceptor agonists and leukotriene receptor antagonists are indicated as add-on therapy in patients not adequately controlled with corticosteroids alone. A number of studies have investigated the efficacy of combinations of these drugs in asthma, but several issues concerning the safety of these treatments are highly debated. This review provides a critical appraisal of the tolerability profiles of long-acting β₂-agonists and leukotriene receptor antagonists used in combination with inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of asthma.     

Combined Therapy with Tiotropium and Formoterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Effect on the 6-Minute Walk Test

Abstract

Combined therapy with tiotropium and long-acting beta 2 agonists confers additional improvement in symptoms, lung function and aspects of health-related quality of life (QOL) compared with each drug alone in patients with COPD. However, the efficacy of combined therapy on walking distance, a surrogate measure of daily functional activity and morbidity remains unclear. The aim was, therefore, to quantify the benefit of this therapy on the six minute walk test. Secondary outcomes included change in lung function, symptoms, the BODE index and QOL. In a double-blind, crossover study, 38 participants with moderate to severe COPD on tiotropium were randomised to receive either formoterol or placebo for 6 weeks. Following a 2-week washout period, participants crossed over to the alternate arm of therapy for a further 6 weeks. Thirty-six participants, with an average age of 64.3 years and FEV₁ predicted of 53%, completed the study. Combined therapy improved walking distance by a mean of 36 metres [95% CI: 2.4, 70.1; p = 0.04] compared with tiotropium. FEV₁ increased in both groups (160 mL combination therapy versus 30 mL tiotropium) with a mean difference of 110 mL (95% CI: ?100, 320; p = 0.07) between groups, These findings further support the emerging advantages of combined therapy in COPD. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials.     

A randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of tiotropium in Canadian patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND:

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who smoke have a greater annual rate of decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) than those patients who have stopped smoking.

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the effect of tiotropium on pre-dose (trough) FEV₁ in patients with COPD followed in Canada.

METHODS:

A total of 913 patients were randomly assigned to receive either tiotropium 18 μg once daily (n=608) or placebo (usual care minus inhaled anticholinergics) (n=305) for 48 weeks in the present randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. The effect of tiotropium on measurements of lung function (FEV₁, FEV₆ and forced vital capacity), symptoms, health-related quality of life (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire) and exacerbations were examined.

RESULTS:

Tiotropium improved trough FEV₁ in both current and ex-smokers compared with placebo. Baseline FEV₁ in smokers and ex-smokers was 1.03 L and 0.93 L, respectively (P<0.001). At week 48, the mean difference between the tiotropium and placebo groups was 0.14±0.04 L (P<0.001) in the smoker group and 0.08±0.02 L (P<0.0001) in the ex-smoker group. Tiotropium also significantly improved trough forced vital capacity and FEV₆ compared with placebo throughout the treatment period (P<0.05, for all). Furthermore, tiotropium significantly improved the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire total score compared with placebo at week 48 (40.9 versus 43.7 units, P<0.005).

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared with the placebo group, tiotropium provides sustained improvements in lung function in patients with COPD, with improvements for smokers and ex-smokers.     

Effects of tiotropium on lung function in severe asthmatics with or without emphysematous changes

The effects of tiotropium, an inhaled long-acting anti-cholinergic agent, on lung function were investigated in obstructed severe asthmatics with and without emphysematous changes despite maximal recommended treatments with high-dose of inhaled glucocorticoids and inhaled long-acting β₂-agonists.We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of an inhaled single-dose of tiotropium in 18 asthmatics with emphysema and 18 without emphysema in a crossover manner. The primary efficacy outcome was the relative change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) from baseline to 60 min, and the secondary outcome was a relative change in FEV₁ from baseline to 12 h. Subsequently, the patients were treated with tiotropium inhaled once daily for 12 weeks in an open label manner, and lung function and symptoms were evaluated.At baseline, patients with or without emphysema had a mean FEV₁ of 55.9% before tiotropium and 56.8% before placebo, or 77.4% before tiotropium and 77.6% before placebo of the predicted value and were taking a mean dose of inhaled glucocorticoids of 1444 or 1422 μg/day. Among patients with emphysema, the increase from baseline FEV₁ was 12.6 percentage points higher at 60 min after tiotropium than after placebo. Among patients without emphysema, the increase from baseline FEV₁ was 5.4 percentage points higher at 60 min after tiotropium than after placebo.Tiotropium resulted in improved lung function and symptoms in asthmatics with and without emphysema. These findings suggest that tiotropium will provide a new strategy for the treatment of bronchial asthma and of overlapping asthma and COPD.