Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE: To evaluate the refractive results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopic astigmatic eyes, and to assess the efficacy, accuracy, stability, and safety of the procedure. METHODS: LASIK was performed on 113 eyes of 73 patients for correction of myopic astigmatism ranging from 1.00 to 5.00 D, as measured by manifest refraction, with a mean baseline refractive astigmatism of 2.09 +/- 1.12 D. The Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper was used to create a corneal flap, and laser ablation was performed using the Chiron-Technolas Keracor 116 excimer laser. Follow-up time was 12 months for all eyes. RESULTS: Refractive astigmatism was stable by 3 months after surgery. At 1 year after LASIK, refractive astigmatism was reduced to a mean of 0.25 +/- 0.31 D (range 0 to 1.00 D). Sixty-one eyes (54%) had no residual astigmatism and 98 eyes (86.7%) had 0 to 0.50 D of refractive astigmatism. The mean percent reduction of preoperative astigmatism was 87.9 +/- 14.9%. The mean axis deviation of the surgically induced astigmatism was 2.1 +/- 3.1 degrees, with 96 eyes (84.9%) within 5 degrees of the desired axis. The percent correction of preoperative astigmatism in the proper axis was 97.1 +/- 15.5%. Spectacle-corrected visual acuity improved by 2 lines in 11 eyes (9.7%), and was reduced by 1 line only in 1 eye. There were no other significant complications. CONCLUSION: LASIK with the Chiron-Technolas Keracor 116 excimer laser was effective for correction of myopic astigmatism, with good stability after 3 months. The results were predictable with an acceptable degree of accuracy. LASIK is a safe procedure with very few complications.     

Two-step laser in situ keratomileusis to correct high astigmatism after corneal autograft

We report a case in which significant anisometropia and astigmatism after an autograft by rotation was treated by a 2-step laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) procedure. Six weeks after the lamellar keratotomy, photoablation was performed using the LADARVision 4000 excimer laser. The ablation depth was 87.2 mum on a 6.0 mm optical zone. One day postoperatively, the uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 7/10 and the refractive error was -0.25 -0.25 x 67. Two months later, the UCVA was 5/10 and the best corrected visual acuity, 8/10 Parinaud 2 with a refractive error of +1.75 -1.25 x 16. The case demonstrates the effectiveness of 2-step LASIK for the correction of astigmatism induced by a corneal autograft. The significant reduction in autograft-induced astigmatism, together with stabilization of the higher-order aberrations, resulted in restoration of satisfactory functional vision.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of hyperopia from +1.25 to +5.00 diopters with the Technolas Keracor 117C laser

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy, predictability, stability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in patients with hyperopia and to evaluate the visual and refractive results of the procedure. METHODS: LASIK was performed on 85 eyes of 53 patients for correction of hyperopia, with a preoperative mean manifest spherical equivalent refraction of +3.31 +/- 0.69 D (range, +1.25 to +5.00 D) and mean refractive astigmatism of +0.91 +/- 1.06 D (range, 0 to +3.00 D). The Carriazo-Barraquer (Moria) manual microkeratome was used to create the corneal flap, and laser ablation was performed using the Technolas Keracor 117C excimer laser with an ablation zone diameter of 6.0 mm and a transition zone diameter to 9.0 mm. Follow-up was 12 months for all patients. RESULTS: Refraction was stable by 3 months after surgery. At 1 year after LASIK, the mean manifest spherical equivalent refraction was +0.43 +/- 0.57 D (range, -1.25 to +2.00 D) and refractive astigmatism was reduced to a mean of 0.36 +/- 0.30 D (range, 0 to 1.00 D). Fifty-two eyes (61.2%) had a manifest spherical equivalent refraction within +/- 0.50 D of emmetropia, and 76 eyes (89.4%) were within +/- 1.00 D. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 in 21 eyes (24.7%) and 20/40 or better in 79 eyes (92.9%). Spectacle-corrected visual acuity was reduced by two lines in one eye (1.2%) and improved by two lines in five eyes (5.9%). There were no significant complications. CONCLUSION: LASIK was an effective, safe, and predictable procedure for the correction of hyperopia up to +5.00 D and hyperopic astigmatism up to +3.00 D with the Technolas Keracor 117C excimer laser. The large size of the corneal flap obtained by the Carriazo-Barraquer (Moria) manual microkeratome facilitated laser ablation entirely in the exposed corneal stromal bed.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis retreatment for residual myopia and astigmatism

PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual and refractive results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) retreatment on eyes with residual myopia with or without astigmatism. METHODS: LASIK retreatment was performed on 35 eyes of 23 patients for correction of residual myopia, with or without astigmatism, with a mean manifest spherical equivalent refraction of -2.17+/-0.82 D (range, -1.00 to -3.87 D) and mean refractive astigmatism of -0.55+/-0.61 D (range, 0 to -1.75 D). Retreatment was performed 3 to 18 months after primary LASIK (mean, 5.1+/-2.6 mo). The corneal flap of the previous LASIK was lifted and laser ablation was performed using the Chiron-Technolas Keracor 116 excimer laser. Follow-up was 12 months for all eyes. RESULTS: At 1 year after retreatment, manifest spherical equivalent refraction was reduced to a mean -0.23+/-0.28 D (range, 0 to -0.87 D), and refractive astigmatism was reduced to a mean -0.16+/-0.25 D (range, 0 to -0.75 D). Thirty-two eyes (91.5%) had a manifest spherical equivalent refraction within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia, and 33 eyes (94.3%) had 0 to 0.50 D of refractive astigmatism. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 11 eyes (31.4%). Spectacle-corrected visual acuity was not reduced in any eye after retreatment. There were no significant complications. CONCLUSION: LASIK retreatment was effective for correction of residual myopia or astigmatism after primary LASIK. Refractive results were predictable with good stability after 3 months. Lifting the flap during LASIK retreatment was relatively easy to perform and did not result in visual morbidity in eyes treated from 3 up to 18 months after primary LASIK.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of high astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correction of high astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty, and to assess the refractive results and predictability of the procedure. METHODS: LASIK was performed on 19 patients (19 eyes) with high astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty, using the Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper and the Chiron-Technolas Keracor 116 excimer laser. The amount of preoperative refractive astigmatism ranged from 6.50 to 14.50 D (mean, 9.21 +/- 1.95 D) and the spherical component of manifest refraction ranged from -7.00 to +1.25 D (mean, -2.14 +/- 2.11 D). All patients completed a minimum follow-up of 12 months. RESULTS: Refraction was stable after 3 months. At 1 year after LASIK, the amount of refractive astigmatism was reduced to a mean of 1.09 +/- 0.33 D (range, 0.50 to 1.75 D), with 57.9% of the eyes within +/- 1.00 D of refractive astigmatism. The mean percent reduction of astigmatism was 87.9 +/- 3.7%. The postoperative spherical component of manifest refraction ranged from -1.00 to +1.75 D with a mean of +0.43 +/- 0.82 D. Vector analysis showed that the mean amount of axis deviation was 1.1 +/- 1.3 degrees and the mean percent correction of preoperative astigmatism was 92.6 +/- 8.4%. There were no intraoperative complications. Spectacle-corrected visual acuity was not reduced in any eye, and improved by 2 or more lines in 42.1% of eyes after LASIK. CONCLUSION: LASIK with the Chiron-Technolas Keracor 116 excimer laser was effective for correction of both astigmatism and myopia after penetrating keratoplasty. The procedure proved to be safe and gave fairly predictable and stable refractive results.     

Bitoric laser in situ keratomileusis for astigmatism

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, predictability, and safety of bitoric laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for the correction of mixed astigmatism. SETTING: Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain. METHODS: This prospective study included 28 eyes of 21 patients with mixed astigmatism who had bitoric LASIK using the Hansatome microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb Surgical) and the Chiron Technolas 217 excimer laser (Bausch & Lomb Surgical). The main outcome measures were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), defocus equivalent, blur strength, and refraction. RESULTS: Six months after bitoric LASIK, the mean UCVA was 0.70 +/- 0.23 (SD). The percentage of eyes with a UCVA of 20/40 or better was 78.6% and of 20/20, 21.4%. There was a statistically significant increase in the mean BCVA from 0.71 +/- 0.19 before surgery to 0.83 +/- 0.15 at 6 months (P =.0004). Three eyes (10.7%) lost 1 line of BCVA; 19 eyes (67.9%) gained 1 or more lines. The mean preoperative astigmatism of -4.04 +/- 1.13 diopters (D) was reduced to -0.67 +/- 0.79 D after surgery. The defocus equivalent was less than 1.00 D in 75.0% of eyes and less than 0.50 D in 64.3%. Vector analysis showed that the mean achieved correction was 97.4% of the intended correction. CONCLUSIONS: Bitoric LASIK was a safe, effective, and predictable procedure in the treatment of mixed astigmatism. It is a means to improving BCVA in a significant percentage of patients.     

Corneal first-surface aberration analysis of the biomechanical effects of astigmatic keratotomy and a microkeratome cut after penetrating keratoplasty

Astigmatic keratotomy (AK) was performed in a patient after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) for keratoconus to reduce high post-PKP astigmatism. The procedure led to a significant decrease in astigmatism, but corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) increased. After PKP, the patient was scheduled for 2-step laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct myopia and astigmatism. One day after the microkeratome cut, a decrease of -2.75 diopters in the spherical equivalent (SE) was noted. Although subjective manifest cylinder and corneal spherical aberrations were marginally affected, a marked decrease in coma and other HOAs could be observed. One month after the cut, the SE was unchanged. Excimer laser ablation was not performed as the patient was satisfied with the result and refused further treatment. This case shows that AK cuts can induce HOAs and a single microkeratome cut performed in corneal grafts can have strong biomechanical effects on lower-order aberrations and HOAs. If LASIK is planned after PKP, a 2-step approach is recommended to anticipate biomechanical effects and avoid overcorrection or undercorrection.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of induced astigmatism from cataract surgery

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, predictability, stability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct residual astigmatism after cataract surgery. METHODS: LASIK was performed on 20 eyes of 20 patients with refractive myopic or mixed astigmatism (3.00 to 6.00 D) at least 1 year after extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation without complication. Each eye received bitoric LASIK with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser and the Automated Corneal Shaper microkeratome. RESULTS: At 6 months after LASIK, mean refractive cylinder decreased from 4.64+/-0.63 D to 0.44+/-0.24 D (P<.001). Mean percent reduction of astigmatism was 90.4+/-5.0% (range 80% to 100%). Mean spherical equivalent refraction decreased from -2.19+/-0.88 D (range -1.00 to -3.88 D) to -0.32+/-0.34 D (range -1.25 to +0.38 D) (P<.001). Vector analysis showed that the mean amount of axis deviation was 0.7+/-1.2 degrees (range 0 degrees to 4.3 degrees) and the mean percent correction of preoperative astigmatism was 92.1+/-5.9% (range 85.6% to 108%). Eighty-five percent of all eyes had a mean spherical equivalent refraction and mean cylinder within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia. Change in spherical equivalent refraction and cylinder from 2 weeks to 6 months was < or = 0.50 D in 90% (18 eyes) and 95% (19 eyes), respectively. Spectacle-corrected visual acuity was not reduced in any eye. Diffuse lamellar keratitis occurred in three eyes (15%) after LASIK, and were treated successfully with eyedrops. CONCLUSION: LASIK was an effective, predictable, stable, and safe procedure for correction of residual myopic or mixed astigmatism ranging from 3.00 to 6.00 D with a low spherical component after cataract surgery.     

Topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (TOPOLINK) to correct irregular astigmatism after previous refractive surgery

PURPOSE: To assess whether topography-driven laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) can correct induced corneal irregular astigmatism. METHODS: A prospective non-comparative case series of 41 eyes (38 patients) with irregular astigmatism following corneal refractive surgery, included two groups: Group 1 (26 eyes) with a defined topographic pattern and Group 2 (15 eyes) with no pattern. Ablation was performed using the Technolas 217C excimer laser with a software ablation program (TOPOLINK) based on corneal topography. Uncorrected and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, manifest and cycloplegic refraction, corneal topography, superficial corneal surface quality, and image distortion were measured. RESULTS: At 6 months follow-up in Group 1 eyes (defined topographic pattern) mean preoperative BSCVA improved from 0.16 +/- 0.11 LogMAR (0.4 to 0) to 0.09 +/- 0.10 LogMAR (0.2 to 0) (P = .001) (safety index of 1.1). In Group 2 eyes (no pattern), mean preoperative BSCVA was 0.18 +/- 0.11 LogMAR (0.4 to 0), similar to the postoperative BSCVA of 0.17 +/- 0.10 LogMAR (0.3 to 0) (safety index of 0.98). Mean postoperative UCVA was > or = 0.3 LogMAR in 25 eyes (96.2%) in Group 1 (efficacy index of 0.8) and 7 eyes (46.6%) in Group 2 (efficacy index of 0.5). Both superficial corneal surface quality and image distortion significantly improved in Group 1; there were no significant changes in Group 2. We reoperated nine eyes (21.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Topographic-assisted LASIK was helpful in selected cases where irregular astigmatism showed a pattern. It was ineffective in undefined irregular astigmatism. Partial correction of the irregularity and regression of the obtained effect was common.     

Toric laser in situ keratomileusis for myopic astigmatism using an ablatable mask

BACKGROUND: To assess the results of toric laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) correction of myopic astigmatism. METHODS: A prospective study was performed over a 20 week period for consecutive patients treated for myopic astigmatism. Spectacle-corrected visual acuity, uncorrected visual acuity, spectacle refraction, videokeratography, and complications were recorded. Vector analysis was performed by the ASSORT program. RESULTS: Sixty-five eyes of 42 patients underwent toric LASIK with a Summit Technologies Apex Plus excimer laser. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction at the spectacle plane was -6.24 +/- 2.42 D (range, -1.63 to -14.63 D) and mean pre-operative refractive cylinder magnitude was 1.99 +/- 1.35 D (range, 0.75 to 7.00 D); mean attempted refractive cylinder correction was 1.90 +/- 1.00 D. Six months after LASIK (43 eyes followed), mean spherical equivalent refraction at the spectacle plane was -0.40 +/- 0.55 D and 31 eyes (72.1%) were within +/- 0.50 D of emmetropia. At 6 months, mean refractive cylinder magnitude was 0.74 +/- 0.70 D, mean surgically induced astigmatism was 1.46 +/- 0.86 D, mean absolute angle of error was 10.33 degrees, mean astigmatic correction index was 0.93 +/- 0.36 D, and mean index of success was 0.46 +/- 0.39. Uncorrected visual acuity was 6/12 or better in 34 eyes (79.1%) and 6/6 in 15 eyes (35%); spectacle- corrected visual acuity was 6/9 or better in 41 eyes (95.35%). Six eyes (14.0%) lost 1 line of spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 6 months and one eye (2.3%) lost 2 lines. Ten eyes (23.3%) gained 1 line at 6 months. CONCLUSION: Toric LASIK with an ablatable mask using the Summit Apex Plus excimer laser is a safe and relatively accurate procedure for the correction of myopic astigmatism.     

Two-stage laser in situ keratomileusis to correct refractive errors after penetrating keratoplasty

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of a two-stage laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) procedure on eyes with high astigmatism and/or anisometropia after penetrating keratoplasty. METHODS: Eleven postoperative penetrating keratoplasty eyes were included in a prospective, non-controlled study. All patients had at least 4.00 D of astigmatism and/or at least 3.00 D of anisometropia and were spectacle and contact lens intolerant. Two-stage LASIK was performed; in the first stage a hinged corneal flap 160 microm in thickness and 9 mm in diameter was created. After stabilization of corneal shape (1 to 3 months after keratotomy), the corneal flap was lifted and laser refractive treatment (second stage) was performed. RESULTS: After the first stage, a statistically significant reduction in refractive astigmatism (P<.01) was recorded. In all eyes but one, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was maintained or improved after the procedure. Three months after the second stage, refractive astigmatism in 8 of 11 eyes (73%) was within +/- 1.00 D, and spherical equivalent refraction in 9 of 11 eyes (82%) was within +/- 1.00 D of intended correction. Preoperative irregular astigmatism persisted in three patients (3 eyes) who could not be corrected within +/- 1.00 D of refractive astigmatism and/or +/- 1.00 D of intended spherical equivalent refraction. In one eye, an interface infiltrate developed shortly after creation of the flap, and resulted in limited melting. CONCLUSIONS: A two-stage LASIK procedure improved visual acuity and refraction in postoperative penetrating keratoplasty eyes with high astigmatism and/or anisometropia. Complications were uncommon but can lead to loss of vision.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism with the Nidek EC-5000 Excimer laser.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy, predictability, stability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed for 92 eyes of 62 consecutive patients to evaluate uncorrected (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and manifest refraction before and 3 and 6 months after LASIK (Moria LSK-ONE microkeratome, Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser). Eyes were divided into groups: Group 1 (low hyperopia) for spherical correction of +1.00 to +3.00 D (22 eyes), Group 2 (low hyperopic astigmatism) for toric correction with spherical equivalent refraction of +1.00 to +3.00 D (18 eyes), Group 3 (moderate hyperopia) for spherical correction of +3.25 to +6.00 D (10 eyes), and Group 4 (moderate hyperopic astigmatism) for toric correction with spherical equivalent refraction between +3.25 and +6.00 D (18 eyes). RESULTS: At 3 and 6 months after LASIK, 68 eyes (73.9%) were available for follow-up examination. Percentage of eyes with a spherical equivalent refraction within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia for Group 1 was 54.5% (12 eyes); Group 2, 50% (9 eyes); Group 3, 40% (4 eyes), and Group 4, 38.8% (7 eyes). UCVA > or =20/20 in Group 1 was 14% and in Groups 2, 3, and 4, 0%. One eye (5.5%) lost two lines of BSCVA. CONCLUSION: LASIK with the Moria LSK-ONE microkeratome and the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser reduced low and moderate hyperopia and was within +/-0.50 D of target outcome in approximately 50% of eyes. Undercorrection was evident in all groups. The procedure was safe.     

Measurement of corneal curvature change after mechanical laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation and femtosecond laser flap creation

PURPOSE: To compare the change in corneal curvature from the predicted surgical radius (sculpted in the corneal stroma) and the measured postoperative radius of the first surface of the cornea after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia correction using 2 methods of flap creation: mechanical microkeratome and femtosecond laser. SETTING: Vissum-Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain. METHODS: This retrospective consecutive nonrandomized comparative interventional case series included 85 eyes with myopia or myopic astigmatism treated using the Esiris excimer laser (Schwind). Patients were divided into 2 groups. One group had LASIK with an M2 microkeratome (Moria) (mechanical LASIK group) and the other, with a femtosecond laser (IntraLase FS, IntraLase Corp.) (femtosecond LASIK group). The relationship between the postsurgical corneal radius and the predicted sculpted radius as well as the mean value of the percentage change in the curvature radius were analyzed to obtain the effect on the refractive defect in each group. RESULTS: There were 44 eyes in the mechanical LASIK group and 41 eyes in the femtosecond LASIK group. A high correlation was found between the final corneal radius and the predicted sculpted radius in both groups (r(2) = 0.85). The mean percentage change in the curvature radius was -3.6% in the mechanical LASIK group and -1.6% in the femtosecond LASIK group (P<.001). The mean estimated refractive change was 1.2 diopters (D) and 0.8 D, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The refractive change in corneal curvature, which related to the biomechanical response of the corneal surface after the flap cut and repositioning, was lower after femtosecond laser LASIK than after LASIK performed using a mechanical microkeratome. Estimations of refractive change induced by this response should be taken into account in surgery design.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for primary and secondary mixed astigmatism

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the efficacy, predictability, and safety of LASIK in the correction of primary and secondary mixed astigmatism after previous LASIK surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative case series. METHODS: The retrospective study included 118 eyes having LASIK with the LADARVison 4000 excimer laser (Alcon Surgical, Orlando, Florida) to correct mixed astigmatism. The eyes were divided into two groups: in group A (n = 64), LASIK was for primary mixed astigmatism and in group B (n = 54), LASIK was for secondary mixed astigmatism. Mean follow-up was 10.6 +/- 5.90 months. RESULTS: Overall, the postoperative UCVA was 20/20 in 51% of eyes and 20/40 or better in 97% of eyes at the last visit. The mean refractive cylinder was -2.18 +/- 0.94 D preoperatively and -0.56 +/- 0.56 D postoperatively. Sixty-one percent of eyes had a refractive cylinder of 0.50 D or less. One eye lost 2 lines of BSCVA (0.8%). None of the eyes had postoperative BSCVA worse than 20/25. The difference of preoperative cylinder was significant between group A and group B (P = .000). However, there was no statistical difference of postoperative refraction and UCVA between these two groups. At 12 months, the mean vector magnitude achieved was 93% of intended cylinder correction with a mean angle of error of -3.0 +/- 16 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK is a safe, effective, and predictable procedure to treat both primary and secondary mixed astigmatism. Nomogram adjustment with spherical and astigmatism components individually may improve refractive outcomes.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis after penetrating keratoplasty

PURPOSE: To assess the outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). SETTING: Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. METHODS: Fourteen eyes of 13 patients who had LASIK after PKP were retrospectively reviewed. The interval between LASIK and PKP was at least 1 year, and the follow-up after LASIK was also at least 1 year. All patients had a stable refractive error for a minimum of 6 months after all sutures were removed, regular and symmetric topographic astigmatism, and a minimal ultrasonic central corneal pachymetry of 500 microm. The Chiron Automatic Corneal Shaper and the Meditec Aesculap MEL 60 excimer laser were used. RESULTS: At 12 months, mean myopia decreased from -5.33 diopters (D) +/- 4.22 (SD) to 0.19 +/- 1.71 D, mean hyperopia decreased from +5.04 +/- 3.32 D to + 0.42 +/- 0.46 D, and mean astigmatism decreased from 5.37 +/- 2.12 D to 2.82 +/- 2.42 D (47.5% of mean percentage reduction). Retreatment was necessary in 42.9% of eyes because of cylindrical undercorrection. Uncorrected visual acuity improved in 11 eyes (78.6%). Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity improved in 6 eyes (42.8%) and was maintained in 4 eyes (28.6%); 5 eyes (35.7%) lost 1 Snellen line. Intraoperative complications included 1 buttonhole flap. Postoperative complications included interface epithelial ingrowth at the periphery (2 eyes) and pseudophakic retinal detachment 2 years after LASIK (1 eye). CONCLUSION: Laser in situ keratomileusis after PKP safely and predictably corrected the spherical component of the refraction. However, the predictability of LASIK in correcting post-PKP astigmatism was poor.     

Flap-induced refraction change in LASIK after penetrating keratoplasty

PURPOSE: To further analyze the refractive and topographic changes occurring with microkeratome lamellar keratotomy and to investigate possible factors associated in eyes with previous penetrating keratoplasty (PK). METHODS: The Hansatome microkeratome was used to create a lamellar corneal flap in 21 eyes of 19 patients after PK. The laser ablation was not performed in the first stage. Pre- and postoperative refractions and corneal topographies were compared to evaluate possible changes induced by the keratotomy. RESULTS: Twenty-one eyes were analyzed in this study. Mean time between PK and lamellar keratotomy was 36.63 +/- 28.23 months (range: 12 to 120 months). No microkeratome-related flap complications occurred. Previous to the keratotomy, the mean spherical equivalent refraction was -4.26 +/- 3.41 diopters (D), mean refractive astigmatism was -4.71 +/- 2.27 D, and mean topographic astigmatism was 5.28 +/- 2.94 D. After keratotomy, eyes showed statistically significant changes in spherical equivalent refraction from preoperative values (P = .025), with 3 eyes showing changes > 2.00 D. Average refractive and topographic astigmatism did not change significantly from before to after keratotomy. However, surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) calculated through vector analysis was > 1.01 in 11 (52.4%) eyes. A statistically significant correlation was found between the SIA values and preoperative refractive astigmatism (P = .025). CONCLUSIONS: Lamellar keratotomy as part of two-stage LASIK in eyes with prior PK led to refractive changes that justify the use of this technique, especially in eyes with high degrees of preoperative astigmatism.     

虹膜识别技术在准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视性散光中的临床研究

目的评价虹膜识别技术应用于准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术（LASIK）治疗近视性散光的准确性、稳定性及可预测性。方法采用虹膜识别引导的LASIK治疗近视散光患者97例（183只眼）,按术前柱镜度数分为3组：1组（-0．50～-1．00D）79只眼,2组（-1．25～-2．00D）70只眼,3组（-2．25～4．00D）34只眼;按术前柱镜轴向分为组A（循规散光）106只眼、组B（逆规散光）43只眼、组C（斜轴散光）34只眼。术前采集散瞳前后的虹膜数据和波阵面像差数据,经过虹膜识别后形成ate文件,将该数据同Orbsesn角膜地形图系统产生的ore文件相结合设计手术方案形成tls文件,导入准分子激光系统,激光器对平卧位时术眼再次进行虹膜识别,确定瞳孔中心偏移量和眼球旋转角度,在治疗时加以补偿,术中三维眼球自动跟踪系统监测眼球运动。观察手术前后不同时期的视力、散光度及轴向变化。结果术中检测出瞳孔中心总体的偏移量为X轴方向（0．41±98．90）μm、Y轴方向（109．15±141．35）μm、眼球旋转偏移角度0．83°±3．40°,术中对其加以补偿。术后6个月裸眼视力≥0．5者183只眼（100．0％）,≥1．0者169只眼（92．3％）,散光度由术前（-1．54±0．65）D减少为术后6个月的（-0．26±0．25）D,对术后各时间点的样本总体散光度进行单因素方差分析,差异有统计学意义（F=5．74,P〈0．01）。各组间两两比较采用SNK检验,术后1周与1、3、6个月比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）;术后1、3、6个月之间差异无统计学意义（P=0．88）。术后6个月顺规散光下降为45只眼（24．6％）,逆规散光下降为31只眼（16．6％）,斜轴散光上升为38只眼（21．0％）,术后6个月有69只眼（37．8％）成为无散光眼。结论虹膜识别引导的LASIK治疗近视散光效果良好,准确性及可预测性较高,是目前精确、先进、有效的散光治疗方法之一。     

Surgically-induced astigmatism after laser in situ keratomileusis for spherical myopia

PURPOSE: To characterize the surgically-induced-astigmatism (SIA) associated with spherical LASIK. METHODS: Refractive outcomes in 70 eyes that underwent primary myopic LASIK with purely spherical ablation were analyzed. The Summit Apex Plus excimer laser was used. The Bausch & Lomb Hansatome with the 180-microm plate was used to produce superiorly hinged flaps. The relationship between refractive astigmatism and corneal topographic astigmatism was analyzed using linear regression and vector analysis. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant negative correlation (slope = -0.21) between refractive surgically-induced astigmatism and preoperative topographic cylinder. A 0.24-D with-the-rule shift was also found. Surgically-induced astigmatism was not correlated with the magnitude of laser ablation. CONCLUSION: The lamellar keratotomy portion of LASIK reduces pre-existing corneal astigmatism and produces a relative steepening of the hinge meridian.     

Wavefront-guided ablation with Bausch and Lomb Zyoptix for retreatments after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of wavefront-guided ablation for treatment of residual refractive error and higher order aberrations after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia. METHODS: Twenty-one eyes of 13 patients with residual refractive error after myopic LASIK were treated with a wavefront-guided ablation with the Zyoptix technique. In 13 eyes of 8 patients (Group A) we lifted the flap with an epitheliorhexis technique; in 8 eyes of 5 patients (Group B) we cut a new flap with a Hansatome microkeratome. RESULTS: Preoperative root mean square (RMS) values were 1.370 for second order aberrations, 0.382 for total higher order aberrations, 0.273 for third order, 0.243 for fourth order, and 0.052 for fifth order aberrations. Three months postoperatively, RMS values decreased significantly to 0.278 (second order), 0.189 (total higher order), 0.138 (third order), 0.107 (fourth order), and 0.038 (fifth order). Ablation depth was two times greater than needed with a standard Planoscan treatment. Patients in the microkeratome recut group showed a trend toward overcorrection, and residual astigmatism was higher (-0.75 +/- 0.58 D) than in the flap lift group (-0.25 +/- 0.29 D). CONCLUSIONS: Wavefront-guided ablation was an effective method to correct residual refractive error and higher order aberrations after myopic LASIK. Functional and refractive outcomes were better when we lifted the flap than when we recut the flap.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia and hyperopic and mixed astigmatism with LADARVision using 7 to 10-mm ablation diameters

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) performed to correct hyperopia, and hyperopic and mixed astigmatism using wider ablation diameters (optical zone diameter and overall ablation diameter) than those commonly used with the same and other lasers. METHODS: After flap creation using an Alcon SKBM microkeratome set for a 10-mm flap diameter, 53 eyes (33 patients) with a mean spheroequivalent attempted correction of +2.34 +/- 2.09 D underwent LASIK (Alcon LADARVision 4000) using a 7-mm optical zone diameter and a 3-mm transition zone for an overall 10-mm total ablation diameter. The nasal hinge was prevented from undesired ablation by the use of proprietary hinge protector software. Eyes were followed for 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Six months after surgery, mean spheical equivalent refractive error was -0.22 +/- 0.41 D. There were 79.2% of eyes within +/- 0.50 D, and 98.1% within +/- 1.00 D of intended correction. Uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better was achieved by 28 eyes (53%) and 20/40 or better by 50 eyes (94.3%). No meaningful visual complaints during nighttime hours, such as haloes or glare, were subjectively reported by patients. CONCLUSION: The use of larger ablation diameters in LASIK for hyperopia, and hyperopic and mixed astigmatism produced accurate results, early refractive stability, and good visual performance.