Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ximelagatran,a novel oral direct thrombin inhibitor,in young healthy male subjects

OBJECTIVES: Ximelagatran is a novel, oral direct thrombin inhibitor designed to overcome the low and variable oral absorption of melagatran, its active form. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ximelagatran following single and repeated oral administration were investigated. The primary objectives were to determine the dose linearity and reproducibility of melagatran exposure and the influence of food intake. METHODS: Two open-label studies were performed in healthy male subjects. Study I was a dose-escalation study, in which subjects received single oral doses of ximelagatran (1-98 mg). Study II was a randomised, two-way crossover study consisting of two 5-day treatment periods, in which subjects received a 20-mg oral dose of ximelagatran twice daily, either before breakfast and with dinner, or with breakfast and after dinner. RESULTS: Ximelagatran was rapidly absorbed and converted to melagatran, which was the predominant compound in plasma. The mean (+/- standard deviation) bioavailability of melagatran was 22.2+/-4.3% and 17.4+/-2.8% after single and repeated dosings, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration of melagatran and the area under the melagatran plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) increased linearly with dose. Inter- and intra-subject variability in melagatran AUC was 8% and 12%, respectively, with no relevant food- or time dependence. Anticoagulation, assessed as activated partial thromboplastin time, was correlated with melagatran plasma concentration. There was virtually no increase in capillary bleeding time over the dose range studied, and ximelagatran was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: After oral administration of ximelagatran to healthy male subjects, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of melagatran is predictable and reproducible.     

No influence of mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ximelagatran,an oral direct thrombin inhibitor

BACKGROUND: The oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran is a new class of anticoagulant currently in clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease. After oral administration, ximelagatran is rapidly absorbed and bioconverted to its active form melagatran.Objective: To investigate the influence of mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of ximelagatran. STUDY DESIGN: Nonblinded, nonrandomised study. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve volunteers with mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment (classified as Child-Pugh A or B) and 12 age-, weight-, and sex-matched control volunteers with normal hepatic function. METHODS: Volunteers received a single oral dose of ximelagatran 24mg. Plasma and urine samples were collected for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses. RESULTS: The absorption and bioconversion of ximelagatran to melagatran were rapid in both groups. The maximum plasma concentration of melagatran (Cmax) was achieved 2-3 hours after administration; the mean elimination half-life (t1/2z) was 3.6 hours for hepatically impaired volunteers and 3.1 hours for the control volunteers. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and Cmax of melagatran in volunteers with hepatic impairment were 11 and 25% lower than in control volunteers, respectively. However, after correcting for the higher renal function (i.e. higher calculated creatinine clearance) in the hepatically impaired volunteers, the ratio of melagatran AUC for hepatically impaired/control volunteers was 0.98 (90% CI 0.80, 1.22), suggesting that mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment had no influence on the pharmacokinetics of ximelagatran. Melagatran was the predominant compound in urine, accounting for 13-14% of the ximelagatran dose. Renal clearance of melagatran was 13% higher in hepatically impaired than in control volunteers. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the concentration-response relationship between plasma melagatran concentration and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). Baseline prothrombin time (PT) was slightly longer in the hepatically impaired patients than in the control volunteers, probably reflecting a slight decrease in the activity of coagulation factors. However, when concentrations of melagatran were at their peak, the increase in PT from baseline values was the same in both groups. Capillary bleeding time was measured in the hepatically impaired patients only, and was not increased by ximelagatran. Ximelagatran was well tolerated in both groups. CONCLUSION: There were no differences in the pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic properties of melagatran following oral administration of ximelagatran between the hepatically impaired and control volunteers. These findings suggest that dose adjustment for patients with mild-to-moderate impairment of hepatic function is not necessary.     

Ximelagatran,an oral direct thrombin inhibitor,has a low potential for cytochrome P450-mediated drug-drug interactions

BACKGROUND: Ximelagatran is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor currently in clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. After oral administration, ximelagatran is rapidly absorbed and extensively bioconverted, via two intermediates (ethyl-melagatran and hydroxy-melagatran), to its active form, melagatran. In vitro studies have shown no evidence for involvement of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes in either the bioactivation or the elimination of melagatran. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential of ximelagatran, the intermediates ethyl-melagatran and hydroxy-melagatran, and melagatran to inhibit the CYP system in vitro and in vivo, and the influence of three CYP substrates on the pharmacokinetics of melagatran in vivo. METHODS: The CYP inhibitory properties of ximelagatran, the intermediates and melagatran were tested in vitro by two different methods, using heterologously expressed enzymes or human liver microsomes. Diclofenac (CYP2C9), diazepam (CYP2C19) and nifedipine (CYP3A4) were chosen for coadministration with ximelagatran in healthy volunteers. Subjects received oral ximelagatran 24mg and/or diclofenac 50mg, a 10-minute intravenous infusion of diazepam 0.1 mg/kg, or nifedipine 60mg. The plasma pharmacokinetics of melagatran, diclofenac, diazepam, N-desmethyl-diazepam and nifedipine were determined when administered alone and in combination with ximelagatran. RESULTS: No inhibition, or only minor inhibition, of CYP enzymes by ximelagatran, the intermediates or melagatran was shown in the in vitro studies, suggesting that ximelagatran would not cause CYP-mediated drug-drug interactions in vivo. This result was confirmed in the clinical studies. There were no statistically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of diclofenac, diazepam and nifedipine on coadministration with ximelagatran. Moreover, there were no statistically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of melagatran when ximelagatran was administered alone or in combination with diclofenac, diazepam or nifedipine. CONCLUSION: As ximelagatran did not exert a significant effect on the hepatic CYP isoenzymes responsible for the metabolism of diclofenac, diazepam and nifedipine, it is reasonable to expect that it would have no effect on the metabolism of other drugs metabolised by these isoenzymes. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetics of melagatran after oral administration of ximelagatran are not expected to be altered by inhibition or induction of CYP2C9, CYP2C19 or CYP3A4. Together, the in vitro and in vivo studies indicate that metabolic drug-drug interactions involving the major human CYP enzymes should not be expected with ximelagatran.     

No influence of ethnic origin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran following oral administration of ximelagatran,a novel oral direct thrombin inhibitor,to healthy male volunteers

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of ethnic origin on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of melagatran after oral administration of ximelagatran, a novel oral direct thrombin inhibitor. STUDY DESIGN: This was an open-label, non-randomised study with a single study session. SUBJECTS: Thirty-six young healthy male subjects living in France were divided equally according to their ethnic origin (African, Asian and Caucasian). METHODS: All subjects received a single 50mg oral dose of ximelagatran in solution. Blood and urine samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were collected up to 12 and 24 hours after administration, respectively. Blood samples were also collected to determine the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), an ex vivo coagulation time measurement used to demonstrate inhibition of thrombin, up to 24 hours after administration. RESULTS: The absorption of ximelagatran, and its bioconversion to melagatran, was rapid in all three ethnic groups. The metabolite pattern in plasma and urine was similar in all groups, with melagatran being the dominant compound. For ximelagatran, the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was similar in the three groups, suggesting that there was no difference in the extent to which ximelagatran was absorbed. Melagatran AUC was higher in the Asian subjects, with a mean Asian/Caucasian ratio (95% CI) of 1.23 (1.04, 1.45). This was presumably because of their lower bodyweight, which is correlated to lower renal function. Following normalisation for bodyweight, there were no statistically significant differences between the three ethnic groups. This finding suggests that renal elimination was lower for Asian subjects, whereas there were no differences in the conversion of ximelagatran to melagatran. The interindividual variability of melagatran AUC was low (coefficient of variation 19-26%), and the mean bioavailability of melagatran, estimated using a mean value for melagatran clearance obtained from Caucasian subjects in a previous study, was approximately 20% in all groups (range of mean values 19-23%). APTT increased nonlinearly with increasing melagatran plasma concentration, and no difference in the concentration-response relationship was observed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: After oral administration of ximelagatran, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of melagatran are independent of ethnic origin. The elimination of melagatran is correlated with renal function.     

Pharmacokinetics of melagatran and the effect on ex vivo coagulation time in orthopaedic surgery patients receiving subcutaneous melagatran and oral ximelagatran: a population model analysis

OBJECTIVE: Ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, is rapidly bioconverted to melagatran, its active form. The objective of this population analysis was to characterise the pharmacokinetics of melagatran and its effect on activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), an ex vivo measure of coagulation time, in orthopaedic surgery patients sequentially receiving subcutaneous melagatran and oral ximelagatran as prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism. To support the design of a pivotal dose-finding study, the impact of individualised dosage based on bodyweight and calculated creatinine clearance was examined. DESIGN AND METHODS: Pooled data obtained in three small dose-guiding studies were analysed. The patients received twice-daily administration, with either subcutaneous melagatran alone or a sequential regimen of subcutaneous melagatran followed by oral ximelagatran, for 8-11 days starting just before initiation of surgery. Nonlinear mixed-effects modelling was used to evaluate rich data of melagatran pharmacokinetics (3326 observations) and the pharmacodynamic effect on APTT (2319 observations) in samples from 216 patients collected in the three dose-guiding trials. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models were validated using sparse data collected in a subgroup of 319 patients enrolled in the pivotal dose-finding trial. The impact of individualised dosage on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability was evaluated by simulations of the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of melagatran were well described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption after both subcutaneous melagatran and oral ximelagatran. Melagatran clearance was correlated with renal function, assessed as calculated creatinine clearance. The median population clearance (creatinine clearance 70 mL/min) was 5.3 and 22.9 L/h for the subcutaneous and oral formulations, respectively. The bioavailability of melagatran after oral ximelagatran relative to subcutaneous melagatran was 23%. The volume of distribution was influenced by bodyweight. For a patient with a bodyweight of 75kg, the median population estimates were 15.5 and 159L for the subcutaneous and oral formulations, respectively. The relationship between APTT and melagatran plasma concentration was well described by a power function, with a steeper slope during and early after surgery but no influence by any covariates. Simulations demonstrated that individualised dosage based on creatinine clearance or bodyweight had no clinically relevant impact on the variability in melagatran pharmacokinetics or on the effect on APTT. CONCLUSIONS: The relatively low impact of individualised dosage on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability of melagatran supported the use of a fixed-dose regimen in the studied population of orthopaedic surgery patients, including those with mild to moderate renal impairment.     

Influence of age on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ximelagatran,an oral direct thrombin inhibitor

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of age on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ximelagatran. STUDY DESIGN: This was an open-label, randomised, 3 x 3 crossover study with 4 study days, separated by washout periods of 7 days. SUBJECTS: Subjects comprised 6 healthy young men (aged 20-27 years) and 12 healthy older men and women (aged 56-70 years). METHODS: All subjects received a 2mg intravenous infusion of melagatran over 10 minutes followed, in randomised sequence, by a 20 mg immediate-release tablet of ximelagatran with breakfast, a 20 mg immediate-release tablet of ximelagatran while fasting, and a 7.5 mg subcutaneous injection of ximelagatran. The primary variables were the plasma concentration of melagatran, the active form of ximelagatran, and the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), an ex vivo coagulation time measurement used to demonstrate inhibition of thrombin. RESULTS: After oral and subcutaneous administration, ximelagatran was rapidly absorbed and biotransformed to melagatran, its active form and the dominant compound in plasma. The metabolite pattern in plasma and urine was similar in young and older subjects after both oral and subcutaneous administration of ximelagatran clearance of melagatran was correlated with renal function, resulting in about 40% (after intravenous melagatran) to 60% (after oral and subcutaneous ximelagatran) higher melagatran exposure in the older than in the young subjects. Renal clearance of melagatran, was 7.7 L/h and 4.9 L/h in the younger and older subjects, respectively. The interindividual variability inn the area under the melagatran plasma concentration-time curve was low following all regimens (coefficient variation 12-25%). The mean bioavailability of melagatran in young and older subjects was approximately 18 and 12% , respectively, following oral administration of ximalagratan, and 38 and 45%, respectively, following subcutaneous administration of ximelagatran. The bioavailability of melagatran following oral administration of ximelagatran was unaffected by whether subjects were fed or fasting, although the plasma concentration of melagatran peaked about 1 hour later under fed than fasting conditions, due to gastric emptying of the immediate-release tablet formulation used. The APTT as prolonged with increasing melagatran plasma concentration-effect relationship was independent of age. CONCLUSIONS: There were no age-dependent differences in the absorption and biotransformation of ximelagatran, and the observed differences in exposure to melagatran can be explained by differences in renal function between the young and older subjects.     

No influence of obesity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran,the active form of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran

BACKGROUND: Ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, is currently in clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease. Following oral administration, ximelagatran undergoes rapid bioconversion to its active form, melagatran, via two minor intermediates. Obesity, defined as body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m(2), is a recognised risk factor for thrombosis. There is potential for differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs administered to obese versus non-obese patients, and some drugs may require alternative administration strategies in obese patients. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of obesity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran after oral administration of ximelagatran. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: This was an open-label, single-dose, group-matched study in which obese subjects (BMI 32-39 kg/m(2); six male and six female; age 21-40 years) were matched by sex and age (+/-2 years) with non-obese subjects (BMI 21-26 kg/m(2); six male and six female; aged 21-39 years). Each subject received a single oral dose of ximelagatran 24mg. Blood samples for determination of plasma concentrations of melagatran and activated partial thromboplastin times (APTT; a marker of melagatran pharmacodynamics) were collected up to 12 hours after administration. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the pharmacokinetic properties of melagatran between obese and non-obese subjects. Values of area under the melagatran plasma concentration-time curve, maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), time at which C(max) occurred and terminal elimination half-life were approximately 1 micromol. h/L, 0.2 micromol/L, 2 hours and 3 hours in both obese and non-obese subjects, respectively. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference between the obese and non-obese subjects in the amount of ximelagatran, melagatran or the minor intermediates ethyl-melagatran and melagatran hydroxyamidine excreted in urine. When relating the prolongation of APTT ratio to the square root of plasma concentration of melagatran and obesity status (no/yes), no statistically significant interaction between plasma concentration and obesity status was observed. Ximelagatran was well tolerated in both obese and non-obese subjects, and no bleeding events or serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of melagatran were detected between obese and non-obese subjects after oral administration of ximelagatran, suggesting that dose adjustment of ximelagatran in obesity (BMI up to 39 kg/m(2)) is not necessary.     

Ximelagatran: an orally active direct thrombin inhibitor.

PURPOSE: The chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, dosage and administration, contraindications, and adverse effects of ximelagatran are reviewed. SUMMARY: Ximelagatran is the first orally active direct thrombin inhibitor to be tested in Phase III clinical trials. After oral administration, ximelagatran is rapidly converted to its active metabolite, melagatran. Melagatran (after oral ximelagatran administration) predictably inhibits thrombin function without need for routine anticoagulation monitoring. Melagatran effectively inhibits both free and clot-bound thrombin-a potential pharmacodynamic advantage over heparin products. Melagatran has a half-life of 2.4-4.6 hours, necessitating twice-daily administration. Melagatran is primarily eliminated by the kidneys and has not been studied clinically in patients with severe renal failure. Ximelagatran has undergone 10 Phase III trials (6 for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism [VTE] due to orthopedic surgery, 1 for initial treatment of VTE, 1 for long-term prevention of VTE recurrence, and 2 for stroke prophylaxis due to atrial fibrillation). Results were generally positive. AstraZeneca applied in December 2003 for marketing approval of ximelagatran for prevention of VTE after total knee replacement surgery, long-term prevention of VTE recurrence after standard therapy, and stroke prevention due to atrial fibrillation. FDA denied approval of ximelagatran for all indications, mainly because of increased rates of coronary artery disease events in ximelagatran recipients in some studies and the possibility of hepatic failure when the medication is used for long-term therapy. CONCLUSION: Ximelagatran has shown promise as a possible alternative to warfarin and other anticoagulants but will require further study to ensure its safety.     

Influence of severe renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral ximelagatran and subcutaneous melagatran

BACKGROUND: Ximelagatran is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor currently in clinical development as an anticoagulant for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease. After oral administration, ximelagatran is rapidly absorbed and bioconverted to its active form, melagatran. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of severe renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran following administration of subcutaneous melagatran and oral ximelagatran. STUDY DESIGN: This was a nonblinded randomised crossover study with 2 study days, separated by a washout period of 1-3 weeks. Twelve volunteers with severe renal impairment and 12 controls with normal renal function were included, with median (range) glomerular filtration rates (GFR) of 13 (5-24) and 86 (70-105) mL/min, respectively. All volunteers received, in a randomised sequence, a 3mg subcutaneous injection of melagatran and a 24mg immediate-release tablet of ximelagatran. Blood samples were collected up to 12 and 14 hours after administration of the subcutaneous and oral doses, respectively, for determination of melagatran plasma concentrations and the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), an ex vivo measurement of coagulation time. Urine was collected for 24 hours after each dose for determination of melagatran concentration. RESULTS: For the volunteers with severe renal impairment, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and the half-life of melagatran were significantly higher than in the control group with normal renal function. Least-squares mean estimates of the ratios of the mean AUC for volunteers with severe renal impairment and controls (95% confidence intervals) were 4.03 (3.29-4.93) after subcutaneous melagatran and 5.33 (3.76-7.56) after oral ximelagatran. This result was related to the decreased renal clearance (CL(R)) of melagatran, which was linearly correlated with GFR. In the severe renal impairment and control groups, respectively, the mean CL(R) of melagatran was 12.5 and 81.3 mL/min after subcutaneous administration of melagatran and 14.3 and 107 mL/min after oral administration of ximelagatran. There was a nonlinear relationship between the APTT ratio (postdose/predose APTT value) and melagatran plasma concentration. A statistically significant higher slope of the concentration-effect relationship, described by linear regression of the APTT ratio versus the square root of melagatran plasma concentrations, was estimated for the group with severe renal impairment compared to the control group; however, the increase in slope was minor and the estimated differences in APTT ratio between the groups in the studied concentration range was less than 10% and not considered clincially relevant. Ximelagatran and melagatran were well tolerated in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: After administration of subcutaneous melagatran and oral ximelagatran, subjects with severe renal impairment had significantly higher melagatran exposure and longer half-life because of lower CL(R) of melagatran compared with the control group with normal renal function, suggesting that a decrease in dose and/or an increase in the administration interval in patients with severe renal impairment would be appropriate.     

Bioequivalence of ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, as whole or crushed tablets or dissolved formulation

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether crushed or dissolved tablets of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran are bioequivalent to whole tablet administration. Ximelagatran is currently under development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was an open-label, randomised, three-period, three-treatment crossover study in which 40 healthy volunteers (aged 20-33 years) received a single 36-mg dose of ximelagatran administered in three different ways: I swallowed whole, II crushed, mixed with applesauce and ingested and III dissolved in water and administered via nasogastric tube. RESULTS: The plasma concentrations of ximelagatran, its intermediates and the active form melagatran were determined. Ximelagatran was rapidly absorbed and the bioavailability of melagatran was similar after the three different administrations, fulfilling the criteria for bioequivalence. The mean area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) of melagatran was 1.6 micromol.h/L (ratio 1.01 for treatment II/I and 0.97 for treatment III/I), the mean peak concentration (C(max)) was 0.3 micromol/L (ratio 1.04 for treatment II/I and 1.02 for treatment III/I) and the mean half-life (t(1/2)) was 2.8 h for all treatments. The time to C(max) (t(max)) was 2.2h for the whole tablet and approximately 0.5 h earlier when the tablet was crushed or dissolved (1.7-1.8 h), due to a more rapid absorption. The study drug was well tolerated as judged from the low incidence and type of adverse events reported. CONCLUSION: The present study showed that the pharmacokinetics (AUC and C(max)) of melagatran were not significantly altered whether ximelagatran was given orally as a crushed tablet mixed with applesauce or dissolved in water and given via nasogastric tube.     

Disposition of radiolabeled ifetroban in rats, dogs, monkeys, and humans.

Ifetroban is a potent and selective thromboxane receptor antagonist. This study was conducted to characterize the pharmacokinetics, absolute bioavailability, and disposition of ifetroban after i.v. and oral administrations of [14C]ifetroban or [3H]ifetroban in rats (3 mg/kg), dogs (1 mg/kg), monkeys (1 mg/kg), and humans (50 mg). The drug was rapidly absorbed after oral administration, with peak plasma concentrations occurring between 5 and 20 min across species. Plasma terminal elimination half-life was approximately 8 h in rats, approximately 20 h in dogs, approximately 27 h in monkeys, and approximately 22 h in humans. Based on the steady-state volume of distribution, the drug was extensively distributed in tissues. Absolute bioavailability was 25, 35, 23, and 48% in rats, dogs, monkeys, and humans, respectively. Renal excretion was a minor route of elimination in all species, with the majority of the dose being excreted into the feces. After a single oral dose, urinary excretion accounted for 3% of the administered dose in rats and dogs, 14% in monkeys, and 27% in humans, with the remainder excreted in the feces. Extensive biliary excretion was observed in rats with the hydroxylated metabolite at the C-14 position being the major metabolite observed in rat bile. Ifetroban was extensively metabolized after oral administration. Approximately 40 to 50% of the radioactivity in rat and dog plasma was accounted for by parent drug whereas, in humans, approximately 60% of the plasma radioactivity was accounted for by ifetroban acylglucuronide.     

Ximelagatran/Melagatran: a review of its use in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in orthopaedic surgery

Ximelagatran (Exanta), the first available oral direct thrombin inhibitor, and its active form, melagatran, have been evaluated in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement.After oral administration ximelagatran is rapidly bioconverted to melagatran. Melagatran inactivates both circulating and clot-bound thrombin by binding to the thrombin active site, thus, inhibiting platelet activation and/or aggregation and reducing fibrinolysis time.The efficacy of subcutaneous melagatran followed by oral ximelagatran has been investigated in four European trials and the efficacy of an all oral ximelagatran regimen has been investigated in five US trials. In a dose-ranging European study, preoperatively initiated subcutaneous melagatran 3 mg twice daily followed by oral ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily was significantly more effective than subcutaneous dalteparin sodium 5000IU once daily in preventing the occurrence of VTE, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement. In one study, there were no significant differences in VTE prevention between subcutaneous melagatran 3 mg administered after surgery followed by ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily and enoxaparin sodium (enoxaparin) 40 mg once daily. Compared with enoxaparin, significantly lower rates of proximal DVT and/or PE (major VTE) and total VTE were observed when melagatran was initiated preoperatively (2mg) then postoperatively (3mg) and followed by ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily. In the US, four studies showed that postoperatively initiated ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily was of similar efficacy to enoxaparin or warfarin in the prevention of VTE in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement. However, ximelagatran 36 mg twice daily was superior to warfarin (target international normalised ratio of 2.5) at preventing the incidence of VTE in patients undergoing total knee replacement in two studies.Ximelagatran alone or after melagatran was generally well tolerated. Overall, the incidence of bleeding events and transfusion rates were not markedly different from those documented for comparator anticoagulants. In a post-hoc analysis of one study, transfusion rates were lower in ximelagatran than enoxaparin recipients.CONCLUSIONS: Oral ximelagatran alone or in conjunction with subcutaneous melagatran has shown good efficacy and was generally well tolerated in the prevention of VTE in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Furthermore, patients receiving ximelagatran/melagatran do not require anticoagulant monitoring. The drug has a low potential for drug interactions and can be administered either by subcutaneous injection or orally. Thus, on the basis of available evidence, ximelagatran/melagatran appears poised to play an important role in the prophylaxis of VTE in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery.     

The disposition, metabolism, and pharmacokinetics of a selective metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist in rats and dogs.

Compound LY354740 [(+)-2-aminobicyclo[3.1.0]hexane-2,6-dicarboxylic acid], an analog of glutamic acid, is a selective group 2 metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist in clinical development for the treatment of anxiety. Studies have been conducted to characterize the absorption, disposition, metabolism, and excretion of LY354740 in rats and dogs after intravenous bolus or oral administration. Plasma concentrations of LY354740 were measured using a validated gas chromatography/mass spectrometry assay. In rats, LY354740 demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics after oral administration from 30 to 1000 mg/kg. The oral bioavailability of LY354740 was approximately 10% in rats and 45% in dogs. In the dog, food decreased the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve value by approximately 34%, hence, decreasing the oral bioavailability of the compound. Excretion studies in both rats and dogs indicate that the absorbed drug is primarily eliminated via renal excretion. In addition, tissue distribution in rats showed that the highest levels of radioactivity were in the kidney and gastrointestinal tract, which is consistent with the excretion studies. Metabolism of LY354740 was evaluated in vitro using rat and dog liver microsomes and rat liver slices. In addition, urine and fecal samples from rat and dog excretion studies were profiled using HPLC with radio-detection. These evaluations indicated that neither rats nor dogs metabolized LY354740. In summary, LY354740 is poorly absorbed in rats, moderately absorbed in dogs, and rapidly excreted as unchanged drug in the urine.     

Absorption,distribution, metabolism and excretion of gemigliptin,a novel dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor,in rats

Abstract

1.?The absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of a novel dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor, gemigliptin, were examined following single oral administration of ¹⁴C-labeled gemigliptin to rats.

2.?The ¹⁴C-labeled gemigliptin was rapidly absorbed after oral administration, and its bioavailability was 95.2% (by total radioactivity). Distribution to specific tissues other than the digestive organs was not observed. Within 7 days after oral administration, 43.6% of the administered dose was excreted via urine and 41.2% was excreted via feces. Biliary excretion of the radioactivity was about 17.7% for the first 24?h. After oral administration of gemigliptin to rats, the in vivo metabolism of gemigliptin was investigated with bile, urine, feces, plasma and liver samples.

3.?The major metabolic pathway was hydroxylation, and the major circulating metabolites were a dehydrated metabolite (LC15-0516) and hydroxylated metabolites (LC15-0635 and LC15-0636).     

Bioequivalence of ximelagatran,an oral direct thrombin inhibitor,as whole or crushed tablets or dissolved formulation

SUMMARY

Objective: To investigate whether crushed or dissolved tablets of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran are bioequivalent to whole tablet administration. Ximelagatran is currently under development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders.

Research design and methods: This was an open-label, randomised, three-period, three-treatment crossover study in which 40 healthy volunteers (aged 20–33 years) received a single 36-mg dose of ximelagatran administered in three different ways: I swallowed whole, II crushed, mixed with applesauce and ingested and III dissolved in water and administered via nasogastric tube.

Results: The plasma concentrations of ximelagatran, its intermediates and the active form melagatran were determined. Ximelagatran was rapidly absorbed and the bioavailability of melagatran was similar after the three different administrations, fulfilling the criteria for bioequivalence. The mean area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) of melagatran was 1.6μmol-h/l_ (ratio 1.01 for treatment II/I and 0.97 for treatment III/I), the mean peak concentration (Cmax) was 0.3μmol/L (ratio 1.04 for treatment II/I and 1.02 for treatment III/I) and the mean half-life (t1/2) was 2.8?h for all treatments. The time to Cmax (tmax) was 2.2?h for the whole tablet and approximately 0.5?h earlier when the tablet was crushed or dissolved (1.7–1.8?h), due to a more rapid absorption. The study drug was well tolerated as judged from the low incidence and type of adverse events reported.

Conclusion: The present study showed that the pharmacokinetics (AUC and Cmax) of melagatran were not significantly altered whether ximelagatran was given orally as a crushed tablet mixed with applesauce or dissolved in water and given via nasogastric tube.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran,the active form of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran,are not influenced by acetylsalicylic acid

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA or aspirin) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of melagatran in healthy volunteers. Melagatran is the active form of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor, ximelagatran. METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomised, two-way, crossover study consisting of two treatment periods separated by a washout period of at least 2 weeks. Twelve subjects received, in a randomised order, either melagatran plus ASA in the first treatment period and melagatran plus placebo in the second treatment period or vice versa. Two single doses of ASA were given, first 450 mg on the day before (day 1) and then 150 mg just before administration of melagatran on day 2. Melagatran 4.12 mg was administered as an intravenous (i.v.) infusion over 4 h on day 2 of both treatment periods. Serial blood samples were collected over the course of the study for the determination of melagatran plasma concentration and coagulation analyses [activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and activated clotting time (ACT)]. Capillary bleeding time was measured before ASA/placebo on day 1 and before and after the start of the melagatran infusion on day 2. RESULTS: The plasma concentration of melagatran during the i.v. infusion was maintained at about 0.2 micro mol/l, and ASA did not influence the PK parameters of melagatran. APTT and ACT increased with increasing melagatran plasma concentration, and the observed increases were similar whether melagatran was administered on top of ASA or placebo. Administration of ASA significantly prolonged the capillary bleeding time (by 41% relative to placebo). Melagatran also prolonged the bleeding time significantly (by 25% relative to placebo alone), but this prolongation was not significantly different from the observed prolongation when melagatran was administered on top of ASA (by 17% relative to ASA alone). CONCLUSION: In young healthy volunteers, ASA had no effect on the PK or PD properties of melagatran at the studied dose. That the combination of ximelagatran with ASA may be used with acceptable safety must be verified in the relevant patient populations.     

Pharmacokinetics of nisoldipine. I. Absorption, concentration in plasma, and excretion after single administration of [14C]nisoldipine in rats, dogs, monkey, and swine

The absorption, disposition and excretion of (+/-) 3-isobutyl-5-methyl 1,4-dihydro-2,6-dimethyl-4-(2-nitrophenyl)-pyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate (nisoldipine, Bay k 5552) have been studied following a single administration of the 14C-labelled compound to rats, dogs, monkey and swine via different routes (intravenous, oral, intraduodenal) in the dose range of 0.05-10 mg.kg-1. [14C]nisoldipine was absorbed rapidly and almost completely. Peak concentrations of radioactivity in plasma were reached 0.9 h (rat), 1.4 h (dog), and 3.6 h (monkey) after oral administration with normalized maximum concentrations being in the same range for all three species (0.49-0.79). The radioactivity was eliminated from plasma with half-lives between 42 h and 54 h within an observation period up to 3 days. The contribution of unchanged [14C]nisoldipine to the concentration of total radioactivity in plasma was low after oral administration (between 0.5% (monkey) and 3.4% (dog) in the peak) indicating an extensive presystemic elimination of this compound. The bioavailability was estimated at 3.4% in rats and 11.7% in dogs. [14C]nisoldipine was highly bound to plasma proteins with free fractions of 0.9-2.9%. The excretion of the radioactivity via urine and feces/bile both after oral and intravenous administration of [14C]nisoldipine occurred rapidly and almost completely within 48 h in all species. Very small residues in the body were recovered at the end of the experiments in rats and dogs (less than 1.6% of the dose). The biliary/fecal route of excretion was preferred in rats, dogs and swine, whereas in monkey 76% of the dose was excreted renally.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Disposition and metabolism of (2S,3S,4R)-N'-cyano-N-(6-amino-3,4-dihydro-3-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-dimethoxy methyl-2H-benzopyran-4-yl)-N'-benzylguanidine, a novel neuroprotective agent for ischemia-reperfusion damage, in rats

The metabolism and disposition of KR31378 (a benzopyran derivative and a novel neuroprotective agent) were investigated following single oral or intravenous administration of [(14)C]-KR31378 to rats. [(14)C]-KR31378 was rapidly absorbed after oral dosing with an oral bioavailability of greater than 71%. The maximum plasma concentration and area under the curve of total radioactivity in rat plasma increased proportionally to the administered dose. KR31378 was distributed over all organs and tissues except for brain, eyeball and testis, and declined by first order kinetics up to 24 h after dosing. Excretion of the radioactivity was 29.5% of the dose in the urine and 58.5% in the feces within 2 days after oral administration. Biliary excretion of the radioactivity in bile duct-cannulated rats was about 66.0% for the first 24 h. KR31378 was extensively metabolized by ring hydroxylation, O-demethylation, oxidation and reduction with subsequent N-acetylation and O-glucuronide conjugation. N-acetylated conjugates (M2, M10, M11, M12, M14, and M15) were identified as the predominant metabolites in rats.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran in young healthy Japanese men

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran, which is rapidly bioconverted to its active form melagatran after oral administration, is being developed for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism. This study assessed the effects of food and repeated dosing on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran after oral administration of ximelagatran to young healthy Japanese males. METHODS: In part one of the two-part study, volunteers (n = 24) were randomised to receive in a crossover fashion a single oral dose of ximelagatran 48mg with or without breakfast on 2 days separated by a 2- to 7-day washout period. In the second part of the study, all volunteers received oral doses of ximelagatran 48mg every 12 hours for 5 days followed by a single dose on the morning of day 6. RESULTS: The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), peak plasma concentration (C(max)) and urinary excretion of melagatran did not differ as a function of whether ximelagatran was taken with or without food. The relationship between the melagatran plasma concentration and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT, which reflects the thrombin inhibitory effect of melagatran) was also independent of concomitant food intake. During repeated dosing, steady-state plasma concentrations of melagatran were achieved after the second dose of ximelagatran on day 1 and remained stable through the rest of the dosing period. The melagatran AUC and C(max) increased slightly (by 18% and 22%, respectively) on day 6 compared with day 1. The interindividual variability in the melagatran AUC and C(max) remained low, as reflected by coefficients of variation of <20% on both day 1 and day 6. The amount of melagatran excreted in urine remained stable over the 6 days of repeated dosing. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of melagatran after oral administration of ximelagatran were not affected by food or repeated dosing in healthy Japanese volunteers.     

Comparable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran in Japanese and caucasian volunteers after oral administration of the direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran

OBJECTIVES: Two studies were conducted to elucidate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran after administration of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran to Caucasian and Japanese volunteers. METHODS: In study 1, with a single-blind, parallel-group design, young Japanese and Caucasian male volunteers were randomised to receive four single escalating oral doses of ximelagatran (12, 24, 36 and 60mg on separate days; n = 27 per ethnic group) or placebo (n = 6 per ethnic group). In study 2, with an open-label design, elderly Japanese male volunteers (n = 12) received three single escalating oral doses of ximelagatran (12, 24 and 36mg on separate days). RESULTS: Regardless of the ethnicity or age of the volunteers, ximelagatran given in single oral doses was rapidly absorbed and bioconverted to melagatran, and the melagatran area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak plasma concentration (C(max)) increased in proportion with the ximelagatran dose, with only small deviations from absolute linearity. Higher melagatran AUC and C(max) were observed in young Japanese volunteers compared with young Caucasian volunteers, and in elderly Japanese volunteers compared with young Japanese volunteers. These results appear to be attributed to weight- and age-related decreases in renal elimination of melagatran rather than to absorption of ximelagatran and formation of melagatran. The pattern of metabolites in plasma and urine was comparable between young Japanese and Caucasian volunteers, and between young and elderly Japanese volunteers. The melagatran plasma concentration-activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT, an ex vivo coagulation time measurement used to demonstrate inhibition of thrombin) relationship did not differ significantly between young Japanese and Caucasian volunteers or between young and elderly Japanese volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: Ethnicity does not affect the absorption of ximelagatran or the formation of melagatran or the melagatran plasma concentration-aPTT relationship. The elimination of melagatran is correlated with renal function.