Improved safety with equivalent asthma control in adults with chronic severe asthma on high-dose fluticasone propionate

OBJECTIVE: High-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have been associated with the same side-effects as oral corticosteroids. Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and budesonide (BUD) in doses greater than 2000 microg/day are used regularly in severe asthma, despite the fact that safety and efficacy data at such high doses are limited. Fluticasone propionate (FP) has been promoted as being twice as potent clinically as BDP or BUD at doses of 2000 microg/day or less with a similar safety profile. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of FP with BDP and BUD in 133 symptomatic adult asthmatics requiring at least 1750 microg/day of BDP or BUD. METHODOLOGY: Patients fulfilling the entry criteria were randomized to receive either their regular ICS medication or FP at approximately half the microgram dose for 6 months in an open, parallel group study. The primary efficacy measure was based on morning peak expiratory flow measurements recorded by patients on daily record cards, while determination of safety was based on a number of endpoints including changes in bone turnover indices, the incidence of topical side-effects and assessments of quality of life. RESULTS: It was shown that patients who were switched to FP, but not those continuing with BDP or BUD, had significant increases in levels of morning serum cortisol and the urine cortisol:creatinine ratio while maintaining asthma control. Serum osteocalcin and the pyridinoline:creatinine ratio, as well as the deoxypyridinoline:creatinine ratio, were also shown to increase only in the FP group. Subjective assessments such as quality of life score, the incidence and ease of bruising, and reports of hoarseness also favoured the FP group. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that, at the doses studied and with the delivery devices used clinically, FP is at least as effective as BDP/BUD in the management of severe asthma and may offer clinical advantages with respect to steroid-related adverse effects.     

Formoterol added to low-dose budesonide has no additional antiinflammatory effect in asthmatic patients

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Adding inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists to a low dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) results in better asthma control than increasing the dose of ICSs. An important, but as yet unresolved, question is whether this is due to an additional reduction of airway inflammation. DESIGN: Double-blind, parallel-group trial. PATIENTS: Forty asthma patients (FEV1, 50 to 90% predicted; provocative concentration of a substance [methacholine] causing a 20% fall in FEV1 of < 8 mg/mL; no ICSs in the last 4 weeks). INTERVENTIONS: Randomization to 8 weeks of treatment with 100 microg of budesonide bid plus placebo (BUD200) or 100 microg of budesonide bid plus 12 microg of formoterol (BUD200 + F). Then the dose of budesonide (BUD) was increased to 400 microg bid in both groups for another 8 weeks. Bronchial biopsy specimens were collected before, and after 8 and 16 weeks of treatment. Eosinophils (major basic protein [MBP]) and mast cells (tryptase) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: BUD200 reduced the MBP staining (p = 0.008) and tryptase staining (p = 0.048) in the epithelium compared to baseline levels. There were no significant differences between the BUD200 and BUD200 + F groups. In both groups, increasing the dosage of BUD to 800 microg had no significant additional antiinflammatory effect. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that BUD administered at a low dose has significant antiinflammatory effects in patients with mild asthma. No significant additional antiinflammatory effects could be demonstrated either by adding formoterol or by increasing the dose of BUD.     

Initial improvements in lung function and bronchial hyperresponsiveness are maintained during 5 years of treatment with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate and terbutaline.

OBJECTIVES: Treatment with inhaled corticosteroids reduces bronchial hyperresponsiveness and relieves airways obstruction in patients with asthma. Up to now, it is unknown whether initial improvements are maintained over a long period of time. Therefore, we assessed whether initial improvements in FEV(1), provocative concentration of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PC(20)), and peak expiratory flow (PEF) persist with a constant dose of inhaled corticosteroids. Furthermore, we investigated whether FEV(1), PC(20), PEF indexes, and symptom scores improve after increasing the dose of inhaled corticosteroids in patients who did not respond sufficiently to treatment with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), 800 microg/d. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with bronchial hyperresponsiveness and airways obstruction completed a previous study on 3 years of treatment with terbutaline, 500 microg qid, and BDP, 200 microg qid. Fifty-eight of these patients participated in the current extension of another 2.5 years of follow-up. Every 6 months, FEV(1) and PC(20) were measured. Five patients dropped out of the study, one for pulmonary reasons. Forty-four patients continued treatment with BDP, 800 microg/d (BDP-800 group), and 9 patients received a higher dose of BDP (500 microg tid; BDP-1,500 group) after the first 3 years because of a rapid decline in FEV(1) (> 50 mL/yr) despite BDP treatment during the previous study period. RESULTS: After the initial improvement, the mean slope of individual regression lines for FEV(1), PC(20), and morning PEF were - 28 mL/yr, - 0.01 doubling concentrations per year, and 0.6 L/min/yr, respectively, in the BDP-800 group. In the BDP-1,500 group, there were no statistically significant improvements in FEV(1), PC(20), PEF indexes, and symptom scores after increasing the dose of BDP. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that initial improvements in FEV(1), PC(20), and PEF are well preserved over 5 years in patients with obstructive airways diseases who are treated with terbutaline and BDP. In the patients who responded sufficiently to 800 microg/d of BDP, there was no accelerated decline in FEV(1) compared with the general population. Increasing the dose of BDP in a small group of patients with an accelerated fall in FEV(1) (initially treated with a moderate dose of BDP) resulted in no significant improvement in FEV(1), PC(20), PEF indexes, and symptom scores.     

Comparable effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide on the HPA-axis in adult asthmatic patients

This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre cross-over study compared the effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis of fluticasone propionate (750 microg twice daily given via the Diskus) and budesonide (800 microg twice daily given via the Turbuhaler). Two treatment periods of 2 weeks each were preceded by a 2-week run-in period and separated by a 2-week washout period. During run-in and washout, patients received beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) or budesonide at a constant dose of 1500-1600 microg day(-1). Sixty patients aged 18-75 years with moderate to severe asthma not fully controlled by treatment with 1500-1600 microg day(-1) budesonide or BDP entered run-in and 45 completed the study. HPA axis suppression was assessed by morning serum cortisol (area under the curve from 08.00 to 10.30 hours) and 12-h nocturnal urinary cortisol excretion, measured at the end of run-in (baseline 1), at the end of washout (baseline 2), and at the end of each treatment period. Neither budesonide nor fluticasone produced significant suppression of either parameter compared to baselines. Only a few patients had serum-cortisol and urinary cortisol values below the normal range, before and after treatment. This shows that the patients did not have adrenal suppression before entering the study. The ratio between the AUC serum cortisol measured after fluticasone treatment and after budesonide treatment was 0.99 (95% CI 0.92-1.06), indicating equivalent effects on the HPA axis. This result was achieved after having omitted two patients' results, due to their very sensitive reaction to budesonide, but not to fluticasone. Two exacerbations of acute asthma occurred during budesonide treatment and none during fluticasone treatment. Both treatments were well tolerated. In conclusion, budesonide 1600 microg day(-1) via Turbuhaler and fluticasone propionate 1500 microg day(-1) via Diskus had no clinical effects on the HPA axis in patients with moderate to severe asthma.     

Effects of once-daily formoterol and budesonide given alone or in combination on surrogate inflammatory markers in asthmatic adults

OBJECTIVES: We wished to evaluate the effects of once-daily combination therapy on surrogate inflammatory markers. METHODS: Fifteen patients with atopic persistent asthma were evaluated (mean age, 32.4 years; FEV(1), 75.2% predicted) in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled crossover study with a 1-week placebo washout period, comparing the following once-daily nighttime treatments: (1) formoterol (FM), 12 microg, for 2 weeks and FM, 24 microg, for 2 weeks; or (2) budesonide (BUD), 400 microg, for 2 weeks and BUD, 800 microg, for 2 weeks; or (3) FM, 12 microg, plus BUD, 400 microg, for 2 weeks and FM, 24 microg, plus BUD, 800 microg, for 2 weeks. Adenosine monophosphate (AMP) bronchial challenge, exhaled nitric oxide (NO), and serum eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) were evaluated at 12 h postdosing after administration of each placebo and after 2 and 4 weeks of each treatment. RESULTS: The results of AMP challenge (provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV(1)) at 4 weeks showed significant (p<0.05) improvements after patients had received all active treatments compared to placebo (20 mg/mL), with FM plus BUD, 261 mg/mL, being superior (p<0.05) to FM alone, 82 mg/mL, but not to BUD, 201 mg/mL. NO and ECP showed significant (p<0.05) reductions compared to placebo with FM plus BUD or BUD alone but not with FM alone. Combination therapy was associated with optimal patient preference (rank order, FM plus BUD > FM > BUD; p<0.0005), highest domiciliary peak expiratory flow, and lowest rescue inhaler usage. All three treatments produced equivalent improvements in spirometry. CONCLUSIONS: Patients preferred once-daily combination therapy, but this had no greater effect on inflammatory markers than therapy with BUD alone. FM alone had no anti-inflammatory activity but exhibited bronchoprotection. This emphasizes the importance of first optimizing anti-inflammatory control with inhaled corticosteroids before considering adding a regular long-acting beta(2)-agonist.     

The effect of high-dose fluticasone propionate and budesonide on lung function and asthma exacerbations in patients with severe asthma.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the comparative efficacy and safety of equal doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) and inhaled budesonide (BUD) using their respective dry powder inhalers in a population of severe asthmatics requiring high doses of inhaled corticosteroid. This double-blind double-dummy parallel-group study compared the effects of 24 weeks of treatment with FP (2000 micrograms daily via a Diskhaler inhaler; Glaxo Wellcome, Evreux, France) and BUD (2000 micrograms daily via a Turbuhaler inhaler; Astra Pharmaceuticals, Rijswijka, Netherlands) on lung function and asthma exacerbations in 395 patients with asthma. FP was statistically significantly superior to BUD with respect to the percentage of symptom-free days (P = 0.02), the incidence of days free from rescue bronchodilator usage (P = 0.02) and the distribution of change in peak expiratory flow (PEF) expressed as a percentage of the predicted PEF (P = 0.04). During the treatment period FP was statistically significantly superior to BUD for change in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) at 8, 16 and 24 weeks, change in the median daytime symptom score during weeks 5-16, for incidence of symptom-free days and incidence of days free from rescue bronchodilator usage during weeks 17-24. There was no significant difference between FP and BUD with respect to the number of patients experiencing one or more asthma exacerbation (33.8 and 28.4% of patients, respectively). There was, however, evidence that the exacerbations were clinically less severe in patients treated with FP, in that the time to resolution was quicker (11.0 vs. 14.7 days; P = 0.035), mean duration of all exacerbations (for an individual patient) tended to be shorter (18.5 vs. 23.6 days; P = 0.12), the time off work was reduced (4.2 vs. 7.6 days; P = 0.012) and the lowest PEF recorded during the exacerbation was higher (301 vs. 263 l min-1; P = 0.07). There were no clinically relevant differences in the safety (serum cortisol levels, markers of bone turnover, adverse events) of FP and BUD at these microgram equivalent doses. The patients recruited into this study, in retrospect, probably had no need for such high doses of inhaled corticosteroid but, irrespective of this, FP at microgram equivalent doses showed evidence of superior efficacy to BUD with respect to lung function and severity of asthma exacerbations without producing any greater adverse systemic effect.     

Chronic treatment with inhaled corticosteroids does not modify leptin serum levels.

AIM: To assess the influence of a short-term treatment with low-dose inhaled corticosteroids on leptin serum levels. PATIENTS: 14 prepubertal children, mean age 5.1 +/- 2.4 years, treated with inhaled fluticasone propionate 100 microg b.d. and 16 prepubertal children, mean age 8.3 +/- 1.3 years, treated with inhaled budesonide 200 microg b.d. METHODS: All children underwent a CRH test with evaluation of leptin, cortisol and ACTH levels before and after 3 months of treatment. RESULTS: Fluticasone group: no difference was found between basal cortisol level, delta and area under the curve (AUC) before and after treatment, though cortisol peak was significantly lower following treatment. Basal ACTH level, peak and AUC were significantly lower after treatment. Budesonide group: no statistically significant difference in any of the parameters regarding cortisol and ACTH secretion was observed before and after treatment. No significant changes in basal serum leptin levels and AUC were observed following treatment in both groups. Furthermore no significant variation in leptin level was observed during both CRH tests. DISCUSSION: Leptin secretion does not seem to be affected by low-dose inhaled corticosteroids; moreover leptin does not seem to be involved in the response of the HPA axis to stress.     

Hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression in asthmatics inhaling high dose corticosteroids

The frequency of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis suppression in asthmatics taking high dose (greater than 1000 micrograms daily) inhaled corticosteroids is unknown. HPA function was studied in 78 adult asthmatics taking long-term inhaled corticosteroids (median dose 1600 micrograms, range 1200-2650 micrograms daily). All patients except one were using metered dose aerosols; 15 were using large volume spacer devices. Median duration of high dose therapy was 13 months (range 1-54). Sixty-nine patients were taking beclomethasone dipropionate (1500 micrograms, n = 36; 2000 micrograms, n = 26, greater than 2000 micrograms, n = 7) and nine budesonide (1200 micrograms, n = 2; 1600 micrograms, n = 6; 1800 micrograms, n = 1). Four patients, all of whom were taking greater than 2000 micrograms beclomethasone dipropionate, were taking 200-400 micrograms of their total dose intranasally. Twenty-six patients had discontinued long term systemic corticosteroid treatment (at least 5 mg prednisolone daily, or equivalent, for a minimum of 6 months) between 7 months and 22 years prior to assessment. All patients had measurements of 9 am serum cortisol and 24-h urine free cortisol excretion and a short tetracosactrin test. Subnormal results were: 9 am cortisol less than 190 nmol l-1; rise in serum cortisol in response to tetracosactrin less than 200 nmol l-1 and/or achieved cortisol less than 500 nmol l-1; urine free cortisol less than 80 nmol 24 h-1. Hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal suppression was defined as subnormal results in at least two of the three tests. Tests were performed at least 2 weeks after completion of any short course prednisolone treatments. Suppression was found in 16 (20.5%) patients (1500 micrograms, n = 6; 1600 micrograms, n = 1; 2000 micrograms, n = 7; 2400 micrograms, n = 2). Risk factors identified for this suppression were: (a) previous requirement for long-term systemic corticosteroids (10/26, chi 2 = 6.1, P less than 0.02); and (b) increasing duration of high dose inhaled therapy (median 28.5 months in suppressed vs. 12 months in normal, P less than 0.05). No clear relationship was identified between HPA function and dose, even when corrected for body surface area and there was no relationship between suppression and number of short courses of prednisolone in the preceding 12 months. Screening tests of HPA function should be performed in all asthmatics taking greater than or equal to 1500 micrograms inhaled corticosteroid daily. Unless function has been shown to be normal, all patients taking these doses should carry steroid cards.     

Adrenal suppression with dry powder formulations of fluticasone propionate and mometasone furoate

Mometasone furoate (MF) and fluticasone propionate (FP) are high potency inhaled corticosteroids. The systemic bioavailability of MF is claimed to be negligible, leading to a minimal potential for systemic adverse effects. We assessed the overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine as the primary outcome of adrenal suppression in 21 patients with persistent asthma (mean FEV1 = 91%). Patients were randomized in a crossover fashion to receive 2 weekly consecutive doubling incremental doses of either FP Accuhaler (500, 1,000, and 2,000 microg/day) or MF Twisthaler (400, 800, and 1,600 microg/day). For the 21 per protocol completed patients, there was significant suppression of overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine with high and medium doses of both drugs-as geometric mean fold suppression (95% confidence interval) from baseline: FP 2,000 microg, 1.85 (1.21-2.82, p = 0.002); FP 1,000 microg, 1.45 (1.07-1.96, p = 0.02); MF 1,600 microg, 1.92 (1.26-2.93, p = 0.001); and MF 800 microg, 1.39 (1.04-1.88, p = 0.02). For secondary outcomes of 8:00 A.M. plasma cortisol, serum osteocalcin, and early morning urinary cortisol/creatinine, there was significant suppression with MF and FP at the highest dose. Our data refute the assertion that MF has negligible systemic bioavailability and a lower potential for systemic adverse effects compared with FP.     

A randomized controlled trial on the effect of inhaled corticosteroids on airways inflammation in adult cigarette smokers.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether inhaled corticosteroid treatment can reduce airways inflammation in adult cigarette smokers. DESIGN: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded clinical trial. SETTING: The subjects were recruited from the community by advertising. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-one adults with a > or = 5 pack-year history who were current smokers, had a normal FEV1, and produced sputum daily. INTERVENTION: Sixty subjects were randomized to receive four puffs of placebo or beclomethasone dipropionate ([BDP]; total dosage, 1,000 microg/d) using a metered-dose aerosol inhaler with a valved holding chamber (AeroChamber; Trudell Medical; London, Ontario, Canada) for 28 days. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Eleven subjects were not randomized because of poor compliance. The primary outcome was fractional airway neutrophilia, as assessed by a differential cell count of sputum. Additional outcome measures were spirometry, measurement of airway responsiveness by methacholine challenge, and lung epithelial permeability measured by the clearance of radiolabeled diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid. There were no significant differences between the two groups in any outcome measurement after 4 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: With normal spirometry, we found no benefit of treatment with inhaled BDP, 1,000 microg/d, on noninvasive measures of airways inflammation in adult smokers. This indicates that cigarette smoke-induced inflammation in its early stages (before a demonstrable airflow obstruction) is not steroid sensitive. This may occur because the site of involvement is not accessible to inhaled medications or because the inflammatory process is resistant to moderate doses of inhaled corticosteroids.     

Integrated plasma cortisol concentration in children with asthma receiving long-term inhaled corticosteroids.

We assessed the effect of long-term therapy with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) on the pituitary-adrenal axis, by measuring the integrated concentration (IC) of plasma cortisol in eight children with asthma (age, 6-16 years) who regularly used inhaled BDP in doses ranging from 8 to 26.5 micrograms/kg (200-450 micrograms/day) for 6 months to 4 years. The control group included six children (age, 6-16 years) who had the IC of plasma cortisol measured as part of an endocrinological evaluation and were found to be healthy. Cortisol concentration was measured in blood samples collected continuously over a 24-hr period. Mean IC of plasma cortisol in the study group was significantly lower than in the healthy controls (mean +/- SD, 4.9 +/- 3.3 vs 9.1 +/- 1.9 micrograms/mL; P less than 0.02). Cortisol response to 0.25 mg ACTH (iv) was abnormal in one of the eight BDP-treated patients. No correlation was found between IC of plasma cortisol and the BDP dose, severity of asthma, height percentile, or the Tanner stage. We conclude that long-term therapy, even with relatively conventional doses of inhaled BDP may cause reduction in the normal physiological secretion of cortisol. The clinical relevance of low IC of plasma cortisol is not clear, but it may reflect partial suppression of the pituitary-adrenal axis.     

Comparison of inhaled corticosteroid combined with theophylline and double-dose inhaled corticosteroid in moderate to severe asthma

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have found that theophylline exerts anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. This study was performed to compare the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) combined with slow-release theophylline (SRT) with that of double-dose ICS in asthma control, anti-inflammatory activity and safety. METHODOLOGY: In a randomized, open, parallel, control trial, 41 patients with asthma were randomly treated with either beclomethasone dipropionate 500 microg b.i.d. (BDP group) or a combination of BDP 250 microg b.i.d and SRT 0.2 g b.i.d. (SRT/BDP group) for 6 weeks. At the start and at the end of treatment, lung function testing and sputum induction were performed, and plasma cortisol levels were measured. Sputum was analyzed for cell differential counts and the interleukin (IL)-5 level. Patients kept a record of peak expiratory flow (PEF), symptom score, and beta2-agonist use. RESULTS: Significant increases in the morning and the evening PEF and FEV1 were observed (P < 0.05), together with an obvious reduction in symptom score and beta2-agonist use (P < 0.01). Significant decreases in the percentage eosinophils and IL-5 level in induced sputum also occurred (P < 0.05). However, there was no difference between the two groups for all these parameters. There was no significant change in the plasma cortisol level for either group. CONCLUSIONS: Both ICS combined with SRT and double-dose ICS had the same effect on asthma control, improving symptoms and ameliorating lung function. Both therapies had similar anti-airway inflammatory effects and therapeutic safety. Combining SRT with ICS may allow a reduction in ICS dose when treating asthma.     

Inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate acutely stimulates dose-dependent growth hormone secretion in healthy subjects

STUDY OBJECTIVES: It is well known that systemic administration of corticosteroids has a dual effect on growth hormone (GH) secretion in man: acute systemic administration stimulates GH release, whereas chronic administration consistently blocks it. In this study, we evaluate whether administration of inhaled corticosteroids could acutely stimulate GH secretion, and whether this effect could be dose related. DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. PARTICIPANTS: Eight normal male volunteers all recruited at our institution. INTERVENTIONS: Administration of increasing doses of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP; range, 50 to 1,500 mug) or placebo. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Blood samples for GH determinations were collected at - 15, 0, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 min in relation to BDP or placebo administration. The results of this study show a peak GH secretion at 240 min after the administration of BDP at doses > 100 microg. The comparisons among the peaks obtained with increasing doses showed a dose-response effect on GH secretion, starting from 100 to 1,000 microg. BDP 1,500 microg did not induce a peak significantly different from that obtained with 1,000 microg. When we calculated the GH response to BDP as an area under the curve (micrograms per liter x 6 h), the data confirmed that GH secretion was elicited in a dose-related manner. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that inhaled BDP at dose > 100 microg acutely stimulates GH secretion in a strictly dose-dependent manner. We propose this test as a surrogate for systemic absorption and as a valuable test to compare systemic effects among different inhaled steroids.     

Addition of montelukast versus double dose of inhaled budesonide in moderate persistent asthma

BACKGROUND: Although current guidelines suggest the use of inhaled corticosteroids as the first line therapy in persistent asthma, the concerns about high-dose corticosteroids may limit their usage. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of inhaled budesonide plus oral montelukast versus a double dose of inhaled budesonide. METHODOLOGY: Thirty patients with moderate asthma took part in the study. Following a 2-week run in period, the patients were randomized into two groups to receive 400 microg/day of inhaled budesonide plus 10 mg/day of montelukast (BUD + M group) or 800 microg/day of inhaled budesonide (high BUD group). The patients were evaluated at 2-week intervals (during a total treatment period of 6 weeks) for symptom scores, asthma exacerbations, lung function, use of short-acting beta2 agonist, blood eosinophil counts and adverse events. RESULTS: At the end of the study, morning and daytime symptom scores were significantly reduced within the groups. Although there was a significant decrease in the frequency of short-acting beta2 agonist use in the BUD + M group, the decrease in the high BUD group was not significant. During the study period, no patient in either group experienced an asthma exacerbation. Blood eosinophil levels significantly declined in both the BUD + M (0.87 +/- 0.31%) and high BUD groups (0.67 +/- 0.29%) as compared with baseline levels (BUD + M = 2.60 +/- 0.65%, high BUD group = 2.60 +/- 0.47%; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the addition of montelukast to low-dose inhaled budesonide is as effective as a double dose of inhaled budesonide in asthma control.     

Improvement in health-related quality of life with fluticasone propionate compared with budesonide or beclomethasone dipropionate in adults with severe asthma

OBJECTIVE: Changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were evaluated in adults with severe asthma following inhaled corticosteroid treatment with high-dose beclomethasone dipropionate or budesonide (BDP/BUD) and compared with fluticasone propionate taken at approximately half the dose of BDP/BUD. METHODOLOGY: HRQoL was assessed as part of an open, multicentre, randomized, parallel-group study in Australia evaluating the safety and efficacy of switching to fluticasone propionate (FP) 1000-2000 micro g/day (n = 67) compared with remaining on BDP/BUD >/=1750 micro g/day (n = 66) for 6 months. Patients completed two HRQoL questionnaires, the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36), at baseline and at weeks 12 and 24. A change in AQLQ score of >/=0.5 was considered to be clinically meaningful. RESULTS: There were significant improvements in HRQoL with FP on four of the eight dimensions on the SF-36 (i.e. physical functioning, general health, role-emotional, and mental health), while there were no significant improvements in HRQoL in the BDP/BUD group. Overall, patients in the FP group experienced significantly greater improvement (P < 0.001) in AQLQ scores at weeks 12 and 24 compared with the BDP/BUD group. On the individual domains of the AQLQ, there were significant treatment differences (P < 0.01) in favour of FP in three of the four domains (activity limitations [0.92], symptoms [0.73], and emotional function [1.02]). Mean differences between groups for overall score and these three domains were also clinically meaningful. CONCLUSION: Patients with severe asthma who received FP (at approximately half the dose of BDP/BUD) experienced statistically significant, as well as clinically meaningful, improvements in their HRQoL.     

Children with mild asthma: do they benefit from inhaled corticosteroids?

In children with mild asthma, who show hardly any abnormalities in pulmonary function, objective measurement of the effect of inhaled corticosteroids is difficult. The short term effect of fluticasone propionate (FP) in these children was evaluated, using both subjective and objective parameters. A total of 68 children (5-10 yrs old) were randomly assigned to either FP 250 microg or placebo twice daily as metered-dose inhaler via spacer during 12 weeks. Symptom scores, use of rescue medication, wheezing, parent global evaluation and pulmonary function tests including forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF) and bronchial responsiveness (provocation dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20)) were evaluated. FP-treated versus placebo-treated children showed significant changes in percentage symptom-free days, use of beta2-mimetics, morning and evening PEF, FEV1 % pred and wheezing. No significant improvements were found in parent global evaluation, absolute values of FEV1 nor PD20. These findings show that inhaled corticosteroids are effective in children with mild asthma. This effect can be assessed by both objective and subjective parameters. Early start of inhaled corticosteroids should be considered even when pulmonary function is normal.     

A randomized, double-blind study comparing the effects of beclomethasone and fluticasone on bone density over two years.

Cross-sectional studies have suggested that asthmatic patients receiving high dose inhaled corticosteroids and intermittent courses of oral corticosteroids have reduced bone mass. This prospective 2-yr study was undertaken to evaluate changes in bone density of patients receiving high doses of inhaled corticosteroids. Patients (n = 33) (males aged 18-50 yrs, females aged 18-40 yrs) on inhaled corticosteroids 1,000-2,000 microg x day(-1), were randomized in a double-blind fashion to either fluticasone propionate (FP) 1,000 microg x day(-1) or beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 2,000 microg x day(-1). In parallel, three open control groups of the same age range were studied: asthmatics (n = 8) receiving low dose inhaled corticosteroids (< or =400 microg x day(-1)) (group A); chronic, severe asthmatics (n = 8) receiving oral corticosteroids (> or =10 mg x day(-1) (group B); and healthy untreated volunteers (n = 7) (group C). Bone densitometry scans (quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of spine; dual X-ray absorptiometry of spine, femoral neck, and single photon absorptiometry of forearm) were performed at baseline and after 6, 12 and 24 months of treatment. Biochemical bone marker measurements (serum osteocalcin, bone alkaline phosphatase, pro-collagen type 1 carboxy terminal propeptide, deoxypyridinoline and C-telopeptide of type 1 collagen) were collected every 3 months. Fifteen FP (mean age 36 yrs, six male) and 9 BDP patients (mean age 33 yrs, five male); completed the study. At 0 months, mean bone mineral density (BMD) was lower in patients receiving inhaled corticosteroids (both low dose and high dose) than in normal volunteers. In the FP-treated group, mean vertebral trabecular BMD quantitative computed tomography remained stable with no evidence of decline, whereas there was some decline in the BDP-treated group. The treatment difference between FP and BDP was statistically significant in favour of FP for quantitative computed tomography measurements after 12 months (p = 0.006) and 24 months (p = 0.004). This study suggests that over 24 months, changes in bone density are minimal in patients on high-dose inhaled corticosteroids.     

Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function after inhaled corticosteroids: unreliability of urinary free cortisol estimation

Free cortisol in the urine (UFC) is frequently measured in clinical research to assess whether inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) cause suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Thirteen healthy male subjects received single inhaled doses (of molar equivalence) of fluticasone propionate (FP), triamcinolone acetonide (TAA), budesonide (BUD), and placebo in this single blind, randomized, cross-over study. UFC output was measured using four commercial immunoassays in samples collected in 12-h aliquots over 24 h. The cortisol production rate was assessed from the outputs of cortisol metabolites. UFC showed a 100% increase over placebo levels in the Abbott TDX assay after the administration of BUD. The other assays detected variable suppression (ranging from 29-61% suppression for FP, 30-62% suppression for TAA, and 25% suppression to 100% stimulation for BUD). Suppression was more pronounced in the first 12 h after TAA and in the second 12 h after FP. Similar suppression was found in each 12-h period after BUD. UFC estimation based on immunoassays after ICS may be an unreliable surrogate marker of adrenal suppression. Many of the published studies describing or comparing the safety of different ICS should be reevaluated, and some should be interpreted with caution.     

Adrenal suppression, evaluated by a low dose adrenocorticotropin test, and growth in asthmatic children treated with inhaled steroids

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence of adrenal suppression and growth retardation in children using moderate doses of budesonide or fluticasone propionate. Seventy-five asthmatic children were randomly divided into three treatment groups: 30 to the fluticasone propionate (FP), 30 to the budesonide (BUD), and 15 to the cromone (CROM) group. FP doses were 500 microg/day during the first 2 months and 200 microg/day thereafter. The respective BUD doses were 800 and 400 microg/day. A low dose ACTH (0.5 microg/1.73 m2) test was performed before treatment and 2, 4, and 6 months later. The test was considered abnormal if the stimulated serum cortisol concentration was more than 2 SD lower than the pretreatment mean (<330 nmol/L). The low dose ACTH test was abnormal after both the high and low steroid doses in 23% of the children. At the 4 month measurement there were more abnormal tests in the BUD (n = 9) than in the FP (n = 5) group (P < 0.05). At that time also the stimulated concentration of serum cortisol was lower in the BUD than in the CROM group (P < 0.01), whereas the difference between the FP and CROM groups was not significant. During the study year the mean decrease in height SD score was 0.23 in the children treated with BUD, 0.03 in the children treated with FP, and 0.09 in the children treated with CROM; the difference between the BUD and FP groups was significant (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the low dose ACTH test revealed mild adrenal suppression in a quarter of the children using moderate doses of inhaled steroids. A FP dose of 200 microg/day caused less adrenal and growth suppression than did a BUD dose of 400 microg/day.     

First-time treatment with steroids in bronchial asthma: comparison of the effects of inhaled beclomethasone and of oral prednisone on airway function, bronchial reactivity and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis

In a double-blind cross-over study of 12 asthmatic patients the effects of 1,000 micrograms.day-1 beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) on airway function, bronchial reactivity and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis have been compared to those of 15 mg.day-1 oral prednisone (PRD). None of the patients had ever received corticosteroids before. Fourteen days treatment with either of both steroids improved airway function, both subjectively and objectively. Both steroids slightly reduced the responsiveness to histamine. PRD suppressed the corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF) stimulated cortisol release more than BDP did, whereas there was no significant change in adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) release. The results indicate that short-term treatment with 1,000 micrograms.day-1 BDP reduces bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) in asthmatic patients, whilst having subtle effects on HPA axis.