Prophylactic anti-emetic therapy with granisetron, droperidol and metoclopramide in female patients undergoing middle ear surgery

The efficacy of granisetron, droperidol and metoclopramide for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in female patients undergoing middle ear surgery was compared. In a randomised, double-blind study, 180 patients received granisetron 40 micrograms.kg-1, droperidol 20 micrograms.kg-1 or metoclopramide 0.2 mg.kg-1 given intravenously immediately before induction of anaesthesia (n = 60 for each). A standardised general anaesthetic technique was employed throughout. A complete response, defined as no postoperative nausea and vomiting and no need for another rescue anti-emetic, during the first 3 h after anaesthesia was achieved in 83%, 58% and 55% of patients who had received granisetron, droperidol and metoclopramide, respectively. The corresponding incidence during the next 21 h after anaesthesia was 85%, 54% and 47% (p < 0.05). No clinically important adverse effects were observed in any of the groups. We conclude that prophylactic therapy with granisetron is superior to droperidol or metoclopramide in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after middle ear surgery.     

Prophylactic therapy with combined granisetron and dexamethasone for the prevention of post-operative vomiting in children.

This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of granisetron, a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonist, and dexamethasone and each drug alone for the prevention of post-operative vomiting by children, with no history of motion sickness and/or previous post-operative vomiting, undergoing general inhalational anaesthesia for surgery (inguinal hernia and phimosis). In a randomized, double-blind manner, 150 children, ASA physical status 1, aged 4-10 years, were assigned to receive granisetron 40 mg kg-1, dexamethasone 150 mg kg-1, or granisetron 40 mg kg-1 plus dexamethasone 150 mg kg-1 intravenously immediately after inhalation induction of anaesthesia (n = 50 of each). A complete response, defined as no emesis and no need for another rescue anti-emetic during the first 24 h after anaesthesia, was 86% with granisetron, 68% with dexamethasone and 98% with granisetron plus dexamethasone, respectively (P < 0.05; overall Fisher's exact probability test). No clinically serious adverse events were observed in any of the groups. In conclusion, prophylactic therapy with combined granisetron and dexamethasone was more effective than was each anti-emetic alone for the prevention of vomiting after paediatric surgery.     

Combination of granisetron and droperidol for the prevention of vomiting after paediatric strabismus surgery.

This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of granisetron plus droperidol with each antiemetic alone for the prevention of vomiting after paediatric strabismus surgery. In a prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial, 120 ASA physical status I children, aged 4-10 years, received granisetron 40 microg.kg- 1, droperidol 50 microg.kg- 1, granisetron 40 microg.kg- 1 plus droperidol 50 microg.kg- 1 (n=40 of each) intravenously after an inhalation induction of anaesthesia. A complete response, defined as no vomiting, no retching and no need for another rescue antiemetic medication, during 0-3 h after anaesthesia was 80% with granisetron, 45% with droperidol and 98% with granisetron plus droperidol, respectively; the corresponding incidence during 3-24 h after anaesthesia was 78%, 38% and 98% (P< 0.05; overall chi-squared test with Yates continuity correction). No clinically important adverse events were observed in any of the groups. In conclusion, a combination of granisetron and droperidol was more effective than granisetron or droperidol as a sole antiemetic for the prevention of postoperative vomiting in children undergoing strabismus repair.     

Droperidol and dimenhydrinate alone or in combination for the prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting after nasal surgery in male patients

Droperidol and dimenhydrinate are inexpensive antiemetic drugs. Droperidol, especially, has been studied extensively, but there are no studies on the combination of both drugs for prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting. One hundred and forty male hospitalized patients undergoing nasal surgery were randomized to receive one of four anti-emetic regimes: placebo, dimenhydrinate (1 mg kg-1), droperidol (15 micrograms kg-1), or the combination of both drugs (droperidol 15 micrograms kg-1 + dimenhydrinate 1 mg kg-1) administered after induction of anaesthesia. Patients in the dimenhydrinate-group and the combination-group received a second dose of dimenhydrinate 6 h after the first administration to mitigate the short half-life of the drug. For general anaesthesia a standardized technique, including benzodiazepine premedication, propofol, desflurane in N2O/O2, vecuronium, and a continuous infusion of remifentanil, was used. Post-operative analgesia and anti-emetic rescue medication were standardized. Episodes of vomiting, retching, nausea, and the need for additional anti-emetics were recorded for 24 h. The main endpoint of this study was the number of patients who were completely free of post-operative nausea and vomiting (Fisher's Exact Test). Furthermore, the severity of post-operative nausea and vomiting was analysed using a standardized scoring algorithm. The incidence of patients completely free of post-operative nausea and vomiting was 62.9% in the placebo-group, 77.1% in the dimenhydrinate-group (P = 0.21), and 82.9% in the droperidol-group (P = 0.07). This increased to 94.3% in the combination-group (P = 0.0015). In all three treatment groups the severity of post-operative nausea and vomiting was reduced significantly compared with placebo treatment (P = 0.0003). The incidence of side effects was similar in the four groups. Dimenhydrinate was ineffective in reducing the incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting and droperidol only reduced the severity of post-operative nausea and vomiting. However, the combination of both drugs significantly reduces the incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting when compared with placebo treatment.     

Prophylactic antiemetic therapy with granisetron in women undergoing thyroidectomy

We have evaluated the efficacy and safety of granisetron, a selective 5- hydroxytryptamine type-3 receptor antagonist, for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in women undergoing thyroidectomy. In a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double- blind study, 100 ASA I patients, aged 30-57 yr, received placebo or granisetron at three different doses (20, 40 or 100 micrograms kg-1) (n = 25 each), i.v., immediately before induction of anaesthesia. A standard general anaesthetic technique was used. A complete response, defined as no PONV and no need for another rescue antiemetic during the first 3 h after anaesthesia, was seen in 36%, 44%, 92% and 92% of patients who received placebo, granisetron 20 micrograms kg-1, 40 micrograms kg-1 and 100 micrograms kg-1, respectively; corresponding values during the next 21 h after anaesthesia were 40%, 44%, 88%, and 88% (P < 0.05; overall Fisher's exact probability test). There were no clinically important adverse events in any group. We conclude that granisetron 40 micrograms kg-1 was an effective antiemetic for the prevention of PONV after thyroidectomy. Increasing the dose to 100 micrograms kg-1 provided no further benefit.      

Granisetron/dexamethasone combination for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after thyroidectomy

This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of granisetron plus dexamethasone for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after thyroidectomy. In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 130 female patients received either granisetron 40 micrograms/kg or granisetron 40 micrograms/kg plus dexamethasone 8 mg intravenously immediately before the induction of anaesthesia (n = 65 in each group). A standard general anaesthetic technique was used. A complete response (no PONV, no rescue) during the first three hours after anaesthesia occurred in 85% of patients with granisetron alone and 98% with granisetron plus dexamethasone; the corresponding incidence for the period 3 to 24 hours after anaesthesia was 86% and 98% (P < 0.05; Fisher's exact probability test). No clinically serious adverse events were observed in any of the groups. In conclusion, prophylactic use of granisetron/dexamethasone combination is more effective than granisetron alone for preventing PONV in women undergoing thyroidectomy.     

Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in female patients during menstruation: comparison of droperidol, metoclopramide and granisetron

The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is high in women during menstruation. We have compared the efficacy of droperidol, metoclopramide and granisetron in the prevention of PONV in female patients during menstruation undergoing major gynaecological surgery. In a randomized, double-blind study, 120 patients received droperidol 25 micrograms kg-1, metoclopramide 0.2 mg kg-1 or granisetron 40 micrograms kg-1 (n = 40 in each group) i.v. immediately before induction of anaesthesia. A standard general anaesthetic technique and postoperative analgesia were used throughout. There was a complete response, defined as no PONV and no administration of rescue medication, during the 24-h observation period in 45% of patients in the droperidol group, 38% in the metoclopramide group and 70% in the granisetron group (P = 0.021 vs droperidol, P = 0.003 vs metoclopramide). There was no difference in the incidence of adverse events between groups. We conclude that the prophylactic antiemetic efficacy of granisetron was superior to that of droperidol or metoclopramide for prevention of PONV in women during menstruation.      

Granisetron in the prevention of nausea and vomiting after middle-ear surgery: a dose-ranging study

This study was undertaken to determine the minimum effective dose of granisetron, a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonist, for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after middle-ear surgery. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled trial, 120 women (ASA I) received placebo (saline) or granisetron at three different doses (20 micrograms kg-1, 40 micrograms kg-1, 100 micrograms kg-1) i.v. immediately before the induction of anaesthesia (n = 30 for each group). A standard general anaesthetic technique was used throughout. A complete response, defined as no PONV and no need for another rescue antiemetic during 0-3 h after anaesthesia, occurred in 40%, 43%, 83% and 87% of patients who had received placebo, granisetron 20 micrograms kg-1, granisetron 40 micrograms kg-1 or granisetron 100 micrograms kg-1, respectively; the corresponding incidence during 3-21 h after anaesthesia was 47%, 47%, 87% and 87% (P < 0.05; overall Fisher's exact probability test). Granisetron 40 micrograms kg-1 appears to be the minimum effective dose for preventing PONV in women undergoing middle-ear surgery.      

Combination of granisetron and droperidol in the prevention of nausea and vomiting after middle ear surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of granisetron-droperidol combination for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after middle ear surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: 150 ASA physical status I patients (108 females, 42 males) scheduled for elective middle ear surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received granisetron 40 micrograms/kg (n = 50), droperidol 20 micrograms/kg (n = 50), or granisetron 40 micrograms/kg plus droperidol 20 micrograms/kg (n = 50) intravenously immediately before induction of anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A standard general anesthetic technique and postoperative analgesia were used throughout the study. A complete response, defined as no PONV and no need for another rescue antiemetic, from 0 to 3 hours after anesthesia occurred in 78%, 56%, and 94% of patients who had received granisetron, droperidol, and granisetron plus droperidol, respectively. The corresponding incidence between 3 and 24 hours after anesthesia was 80%, 52% and 94%. Thus, a complete response within the first 24-hour postanesthetic period was greater in patients receiving granisetron-droperidol combination than in those receiving granisetron alone or droperidol alone (p < 0.05). No clinically adverse events were observed in any of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of granisetron and droperidol is more effective than droperidol or granisetron alone for the prevention of PONV after middle ear surgery.     

Granisetron reduces post-operative vomiting in children: a dose-ranging study

This study was undertaken to determine the minimum effective dose of granisetron, 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonist, for the prevention of post-operative vomiting in children undergoing general inhalational anaesthesia for surgery (inguinal hernia and phimosis). In a randomized, double-blind manner, 120 children, ASA physical status I, aged 4-10 years, were assigned to receive placebo (saline) or granisetron at three different doses (20 micrograms kg-1, 40 micrograms kg-1, 100 micrograms kg-1) intravenously immediately after inhalation induction of anaesthesia (n = 30 of each). A complete response, defined as no emesis and no need for another rescue antiemetic during the first 24 h after anaesthesia, occurred in 57% with placebo, 67% with granisetron 20 micrograms kg-1, 90% with granisetron 40 micrograms kg-1 and 90% with granisetron 100 micrograms kg-1 respectively (P < 0.05; overall Fisher's exact probability test). No clinically important adverse events were observed in any of the groups. Our results suggest that granisetron 40 micrograms kg-1 is the minimum effective dose for the prevention of emesis after paediatric surgery, and that increasing its dose to 100 micrograms kg-1 provides no demonstrable benefit.     

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting with granisetron: a randomized,double-blind comparison with droperidol

The effects of granisetron for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting were investigated in a randomized, double-blind comparison with droperidol and placebo in 100 patients undergoing general anaesthesia for major gynaecological surgery. The patients received a single dose of either granisetron (40 μg · kg^{? 1}, n = 25), dropéridol (1.25 mg, n = 25; 2.5 mg n = 25) or placebo (saline, n = 25) iv over two to five minutes immediately before induction of anaesthesia. The antiemetic effects of these drugs were evaluated during the first three and the next 21 hr after recovery from anaesthesia. During 0– 3 hr after anaesthesia, the frequency of nausea and vomiting was 60%, 12%, 16% and 12% after administration of placebo, granisetron, droperidol 1.25 mg or droperidol 2.5 mg, respectively. The corresponding frequencies during 3– 24 hr after anaesthesia were 44%, 8%, 36% and 12%. The efficacy of granisetron in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting was almost equal to that of droperidol 2.5 mg. The awakening time in the patients who had received droperidol 2.5 mg was prolonged by approximately three minutes compared with the placebo group (P < 0.05), and postoperative drowsiness/sedation was observed in these patients. In conclusion, preoperative prophylactic administration of granisetron is superior to that of droperidol in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after anaesthesia.     

Droperidol-supplemented anaesthesia decreases post-operative nausea and vomiting but impairs post-operative mood and well-being.

Post-operative nausea and vomiting is distressing for patients and can cause dissatisfaction and impaired well-being in the post-operative period. This study examined the question whether the reduced incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting inevitably translates into improved clinical status and well-being. In this context high doses of droperidol were investigated. On the one hand, droperidol is known to be a powerful anti-emetic, but on the other hand there is concern about psychological effects, both in the pre- and the post-operative period. In this prospective randomized double-blinded study, droperidol (5-7.5 mg) was compared with midazolam (5-7.5 mg) used to supplement fentanyl-N2O based anaesthesia, with respect to post-operative mood and well-being using a psychological questionnaire (Bf-S-test). Furthermore, the incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting was recorded. Out of 160 patients undergoing thyroidectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy, data from 150 patients were analysed. The administration of droperidol significantly lowered the incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting from 77.8% to 55.1% compared with midazolam (P = 0.0059; chi 2-test). Although post-operative nausea and vomiting is an independent risk factor for post-operative discomfort and bad mood, patients receiving droperidol showed impaired well-being 6 h after surgery. Well-being scores returned to pre-operative base-line values and did not differ between the two groups 24 and 48 h post-operatively. The reduced incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting achieved with high dose droperidol does not equate with increased post-operative well-being. It is an important point at issue to decide whether smaller doses of droperidol that are commonly used for anti-emetic therapy are free of these side effects.     

Comparison of anti-emetic effects of ondansetron, metoclopromide or a combination of both in children undergoing surgery for strabismus

This prospective, randomized and double-blinded study was designed to evaluate the anti-emetic efficacy of a combination of ondansetron and metoclopramide in 100 ASA physical status I and II children of either sex and 1-15 years of age undergoing elective surgery for strabismus. A standardized anaesthetic technique and post-operative analgesia were used for all the children. Children were divided into four groups. They received saline, metoclopromide 250 micrograms kg-1, ondansetron 150 micrograms kg-1 or a combination of metoclopramide 150 micrograms kg-1 and ondansetron 100 micrograms kg-1 intravenously immediately after the insertion of an intravenous cannulae. There were no differences between the groups in their age, gender, weight, duration of surgery, number of muscles subjected to surgery or intravenous fluids received. In the first 24 post-operative hours, 18 (72%) patients in the placebo group, 15 (60%) patients in the metoclopramide group, 10 (40%) patients in the ondansetron group and 11 (44%) patients in the combination group had nausea or vomiting. The overall incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting was significantly (P < 0.05) lower in the combination group and in the ondansetron group compared with the placebo group. Nine (36%) patients in both the placebo and the metoclopramide groups and one (4%) patient in the ondansetron group required rescue anti-emetic treatment. None of the patients in the combination group required rescue anti-emetic and this was significantly less (P < 0.01) when compared with the placebo and the metoclopramide groups. Recovery and sedation scores were comparable in all the four groups. A combination of metoclopramide 150 micrograms kg-1 and ondansetron 100 micrograms kg-1 administered prior to surgery was not found to be more effective than ondansetron 150 micrograms kg-1 alone for the prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting following surgical repair of strabismus in paediatric patients.     

Superior anti-emetic efficacy of granisetron-dexamethasone combination in children undergoing middle ear surgery

AIM: To compare the effectiveness of granisetron and a granisetron-dexamethasone combination for the prevention of post-operative vomiting in children undergoing middle ear surgery. METHODS: Ninety ASA physical status I or II children, aged 3-12 years, were randomly assigned to three groups of 30 each to receive a single dose of placebo (normal saline), granisetron 40 microg/kg or a combination of granisetron 40 microg/kg and dexamethasone 150 microg/kg intravenously after the induction of anaesthesia. Peri-operative anaesthetic care was standardized in all children. Post-operatively, during the first 24 h after anaesthesia, the frequencies of retching and vomiting and the incidence of adverse events were recorded. Rescue anti-emetic was administered if two or more episodes of emesis occurred. Post-operative pain was treated with morphine intravenously, followed by acetaminophen orally. RESULTS: There were no differences between the treatment groups with regard to demographic data. A complete response (no retching/vomiting and no need for rescue anti-emetic) was achieved in 50%, 80% and 96.67% of children who received saline, granisetron and granisetron-dexamethasone, respectively (P < 0.05). Six children who received placebo and one who received granisetron alone required another rescue anti-emetic. The incidence of adverse events was comparable in the three groups. CONCLUSION: The prophylactic granisetron-dexamethasone combination was more effective than granisetron alone in the prevention of post-operative emesis during the first 24 h after anaesthesia in children undergoing middle ear surgery.     

Metoclopramide does not decrease the incidence of nausea and vomiting after alfentanil for outpatient anaesthesia

Sixty patients were studied in a randomized, double-blind manner to determine whether metoclopramide added to droperidol decreased further the incidence of emetic symptoms (nausea, retching, vomiting) in outpatients receiving alfentanil anaesthesia for nasal surgery. Group 1 (n = 30) received metoclopramide 0.15 mg.kg-1 and Group 2 (n = 30) received placebo. In addition, both groups received droperidol 0.02 mg.kg-1 immediately before anaesthesia which was supplemented by alfentanil 20 micrograms.kg-1 at induction followed by an infusion of 0.25-1 micrograms.kg-1.min-1. Emetic symptoms were assessed 0-3 hr, 3-6 hr and 6-24 hr after surgery. Both groups received similar doses of alfentanil (mean +/- SD; Group 1 4641 +/- 1894 micrograms, Group 2 4714 +/- 1640 micrograms). The percentage of patients who had either nausea or vomiting at 0-3, 3-6 or 6-24 hr was 23%, 14% and 13% in Group 1; and 20%, 17% and 10% in Group 2. The overall incidence for each group was 8/30 (27%). There was no difference in the incidence of emetic symptoms between the groups at any time interval or throughout the study. Metoclopramide did not improve upon the antiemesis of droperidol during alfentanil anaesthesia for outpatient nasal surgery.     

Granisetron/dexamethasone combination for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Dexamethasone decreases chemotherapy-induced emesis when added to an antiemetic regimen. This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of granisetron/dexamethasone combination for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after lapIaroscopic cholecystectomy (LC). In a prospective, randomized, double-blind manner, 120 patients (83 females), aged 25-65 years, were assigned to receive granisetron 40 microg kg-1 alone or granisetron 40 microg kg-1 plus dexamethasone 8 mg (n=60 of each) intravenously immediately before the induction of anaesthesia. A standardized general anaesthetic procedure and postoperative analgesia were used. A complete response, defined as no PONV and no need for another rescue antiemetic, during 0-3 h after anaesthesia was 83% with granisetron and 98% with granisetron plus dexamethasone, respectively (P=0.008); the corresponding incidence during 3-24 h after anaesthesia was 83% and 98% (P=0.008). No clinically important adverse events were observed in any of the group. In conclusion, prophylactic therapy with granisetron/dexamethasone combination is more effective than granisetron alone for the prevention of PONV after LC.     

Droperidol, alizapride and metoclopramide in the prevention and treatment of post-operative emetic sequelae

Women (182) undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery under general anaesthesia received 100 or 200 mg alizapride, 1.25 mg droperidol, 20 mg metoclopramide or a saline placebo intravenously 5-10 min before the end of anaesthesia in a double-blind random fashion to prevent post-operative nausea and vomiting. Administration of the same anti-emetic was repeated during 24 h post-operatively if the patient complained of nausea or retched or vomited. Significantly fewer patients given any of the anti-emetics prophylactically were nauseated or vomited in comparison with patients given saline. The incidence of nausea and vomiting in the saline group was 83%, while in those patients who received an anti-emetic it was as follows: droperidol 35% (P less than 0.001 vs. saline), alizapride, 100 mg 46% (P less than 0.01), alizapride 200 mg 53% (P less than 0.05) and metoclopramide 58% (P less than 0.05). The number of patients needing an additional dose of the same substance in the post-operative period was significantly higher in the saline group (67%) than in the groups which had received droperidol (32%, P less than 0.01) and alizapride 100 mg (37%, P less than 0.05) or 200 mg (33%, P less than 0.05). The patients who received metoclopramide, however, did not differ statistically from the saline group in the treatment of nausea and vomiting. It is concluded that droperidol was the most effective, and metoclopramide the least effective, anti-emetic in this study.     

Anti-emetic efficacy of prophylactic granisetron compared with perphenazine for the prevention of post-operative vomiting in children.

We have compared the efficacy of granisetron with perphenazine in the prevention of vomiting after tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy in children. In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 90 paediatric patients, ASA I, aged 4-10 years, received granisetron 40 mg kg-1 or perphenazine 70 mg kg-1 (n = 45 each) intravenously immediately after an inhalation induction of anaesthesia. A standard general anaesthetic technique was employed throughout. A complete response, defined as no emesis with no need for another rescue antiemetic, during the first 3 h (0-3 h) after anesthesia was 87% with granisetron and 78% with perphenazine (P = 0.204). The corresponding incidence during the next 21 h (3-24 h) after anaesthesia was 87% and 62% (P = 0.007). No clinically serious adverse events were observed in any of the groups. We conclude that granisetron is a better anti-emetic than perphenazine for the long-term prevention of post-operative vomiting in children undergoing general anaesthesia for tonsillectomy.     

Granisetron reduces the incidence of nausea and vomiting after middle ear surgery

We studied the efficacy of granisetron, a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine type-3 receptor antagonist, in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after middle ear surgery. In a randomized, double- blind, placebo-controlled study, 60 ASA I patients received placebo (saline) or granisetron 40 micrograms kg-1 i.v. immediately before induction of anaesthesia (n = 30 in each group). A standard general anaesthetic technique was used. During the first 24 h after anaesthesia, the incidence of PONV in patients who had received granisetron was lower than in those who had received placebo (17% vs 63%; P < 0.05). There were no clinically important adverse effects in either group. We conclude that granisetron, given before anaesthesia, reduced the incidence of PONV after middle ear surgery.      

Comparison of granisetron and granisetron plus dexamethasone for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomies are associated with an appreciably high rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of granisetron plus dexamethasone with granisetron alone for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind study, 120 patients of both sexes received granisetron 40 micro g kg-1 alone or granisetron 40 micro g kg-1 plus dexamethasone 8 mg (n=60 of each) intravenously immediately before induction of anesthesia. Perioperative anesthetic care was standardized in all patients. Patients were then observed for 24 h after administration of the study drug. RESULTS: A complete response (defined as no PONV and no need for another rescue antiemetic) was achieved in 83% of the patients given granisetron and in 95% of the patients given granisetron plus dexamethasone (P<0.05). The overall cumulative incidences (0-24 h) of PONV were 11 (18.3%) in the granisetron and three (5%) in the combination group. No difference in adverse events were observed in any of the groups. CONCLUSION: The combination (granisetron plus dexamethasone) further increases the chance of complete response than granisetron alone. Therefore, the combination might be considered clinically relevant in a high risk setting.